Surgical Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-Analyses
REVIEWS Surgical Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-Analyses Rajat Kalra, MBChB,* Navkaranbir S. Bajaj, MD, MPH,* Pankaj Arora, MD, Garima Arora, MD, William A. Crosland, MD, David C. McGiffin, MD, and Mustafa I. Ahmed, MD Department of Medicine and Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; and Division of Cardiology, Baptist Princeton, Birmingham, Alabama Surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) is a viable treat- inhospital all-cause mortality rate was 26.3% (95% confi- ment approach for subsets of patients with acute pulmo- dence interval: 22.5% to 30.5%). Surgical site complications nary embolism. However, outcomes data are limited. We occurred in 7.0% of operations (95% confidence interval: sought to characterize mortality and safety outcomes for 4.9% to 9.8%). More investigation is required to define the this population. Studies reporting inhospital mortality for patient population that would benefit the most from SPE. patients undergoing SPE for acute pulmonary embolism were included. In 56 eligible studies, we found 1,579 (Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:982–90) patients who underwent 1,590 SPE operations. The pooled Ó 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons cute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a disease that Despite the consensus guidelines, SPE has historically Acarries significant morbidity and mortality risk [1–4].
[Show full text]