Oocytes, Larvae, and Cleptoparasitic Behavior of Biastes Emarginatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae: Biastini)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oocytes, Larvae, and Cleptoparasitic Behavior of Biastes Emarginatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae: Biastini) PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 3667, 15 pp., 30 figures, 1 table November 30, 2009 Oocytes, Larvae, and Cleptoparasitic Behavior of Biastes emarginatus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae: Biastini) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.,1 JAKUB STRAKA,2 AND KATERINA REZKOVA2 ABSTRACT We present information on the nest-searching and parasitic behavior of the European cleptoparasitic bee Biastes emarginatus (Schenck), found attacking nests of Rophites quinquespi- nosus Spinola in the Czech Republic. Its mature oocyte, first instar, and last larval instar are described and illustrated by SEM micrographs, microphotographs, and diagrams. These stages are compared with those of other members of the Biastini. Because the first instar of the related Neopasites cressoni had not been described before, its description is appended, so that comparisons can be made with B. emarginatus. In most respects, the biology and immature stages of B. emarginatus closely resemble what is known concerning other tribal members, but we note that the mature larva, though agreeing morphologically with those of close relatives, has an anatomy that invites investigation into adaptive function. INTRODUCTION genera totalling12 named species is restricted to the Holarctic region, with Neopasites and This study reports on the biology and imma- Rhopalolemma in North America and Biastes ture stages of the cleptoparasitic bee Biastes in the Palearctic (Michener, 2007). Known emarginatus (Schenck) and compares the infor- hosts of all biastines belong to the Rophitinae mation with existing knowledge concerning (Halictidae), as follows (host names in parenthe- other members of the Biastini, one of the ses): Neopasites (Dufourea), Rhopalolemma numerous tribes of the Nomadinae, all of which (Protodufourea), Biastes (Systropha, Rophites, are cleptoparasites. This small tribe of three and Dufourea) (Michener, 2007; Westrich, 1989). 1 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]). 2 Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Department of Zoology, Vinicˇna´ 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic ([email protected]). Copyright E American Museum of Natural History 2009 ISSN 0003-0082 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3667 Beyond host associations, biological infor- Miller), but much of the area received consid- mation concerning these cleptoparasitic gen- erable sunlight during a large part of sunny era is limited. Torchio et al. (1967) described days.Groundcover,mostlytallgrasses(ca host-searching behavior of adults, the eggs, 30 cm high), obscured much of the surface, so egg-laying habits, and larval behavior of that many nest entrances were partly or Neopasites cressoni Crawford. Rozen et al. completely hidden. Nest entrances, surrounded (1997) reported on various aspects of the by tumuli when fresh, were left opened during biology of Rhopalolemma rotundiceps Roig- foraging. The main burrows of host nests Alsina. However, details concerning the biol- descended vertically with sharp turns to avoid ogy of Biastes have been lacking. rocks. Cells in a nest were arranged singly (i.e., The immature stages of these three genera not in linear series). Scattered nests were found have been examined on a number of occasions. a few meters away from the main site, but Egg/mature oocytes of exemplars of all genera activity of B. emarginatus was low there. At have been described. Most of these descriptions least 10 Biastes females flew over the main part were accompanied by information concerning of the nest aggregation during the peak of the number of ovarioles per ovary found in activity on sunny days. dissections because among the Nomadinae there The aggregation was studied during 3–18 is extensive variation in ovariole counts from August 2008. Rophites females were active one species to the next. Egg/oocyte descriptions from early morning to late afternoon, flying are as follows: Neopasites cressoni (Torchio et even when the sky was overcast. In contrast, al., 1967; Rozen et al., 1997); Rhopalolemma flight activity of Biastes depended on weather rotundiceps (Rozen et. al., 1997); Biastes brevi- conditions. They flew only during warm, cornis (Panzer) (Rozen and O¨ zbek, 2003). sunny, windless days (temperatures 25–30uC), Information concerning ovary statistics is sum- and on such days they preferred host nests marized in Rozen (2003). Descriptions of first situated in sunny places. In addition, search- instars of the Biastini have been lacking until ing Biastes females moved with the sunny now. Because we describe here the first instar of areas as these areas shifted during the day. Biastes emarginatus, we append a comparative Only during the warmest days, when the account of the first instar of N. cressoni.Mature temperature rose over 30uC, did Biastes biastine larvae have been described, as follows: females prefer shaded parts of the nesting site. N. cressoni (Rozen, 1966, 1996a; McGinley, When the temperature fell below 25uC, the 1981) and R. rotundiceps (Rozen et al., 1997). bees flew strictly in shafts of sunlight or were An intermediate stage larva of Biastes emargi- inactive, behaving similarly to the thermoph- natus was treated by Rozen (1993), as was the ilous behavior of another cleptoparasitic bee pupa of N. cressoni (Rozen, 1997). Epeoloides coecutiens (Fabricius) (Straka and Bogusch, 2007a). Because the site was com- BIOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS pletely shaded in the morning and late afternoon, Biastes females were active only J.S. and K.R. made the following observa- from 10:30 A.M. to 4:00–5:00 P.M. (CEST). tions on Biastes emarginatus at a dense nest- While searching Biastes females usually flew ing aggregation of Rophites quinquespinosus slowly close to the vegetation, scanning the Spinola in a large, unattended garden in ground surface for host nests. Because nests Praha-Misˇkovice, a district of Prague, Czech were often well hidden in the grass, Biastes Republic. This nesting site was discovered in would usually land when they spotted suspi- 2006 and checked yearly since then. The cious places and finish their inspections by Rophites nest aggregation occupied about a 3 crawling through the vegetation. The efficien- 3 3 m section of a 40–45u sloping surface on the cy of finding nests seemed rather low, in that sunny edge of a deciduous forest. More than 40 cleptoparasites usually spent a long time nests were observed there at a single time during searching before finding active host nests. the course of our observations. The site was Females of Biastes always immediately enter partly shielded by the forest canopy from rain, a newly discovered nest and probably check its particularly by one old linden tree (Tilia cordata contents. Of 21 visits, most took only a very 2009 ROZEN ET AL.: BEHAVIOR OF BIASTES EMARGINATUS 3 short time (5–47 sec, on average 29 sec), probably indicating that the cell conditions were inadequate for successful egg laying. Seven attempts were probably successful as they took on average 1 min, 48 sec (the longest took 2 min, 30 sec). Interestingly, in about half these cases, the cleptoparasite waited 3–8 sec at the nest entrance before flying away, probably checking the conditions outside but risking confrontation with the host. If the entrance became shaded during the inspection, the parasite waited at the entrance several more seconds. Parasitic behavior at the aggregation often resulted in conflict. Owners of active nests visit their nests many times a day, in that a female of Rophites quinquespinosus spends approxi- mately 15 min inside her nest and 45 min foraging for every hour of daily activity. This means that the nest is protected at least one quarter of the time. Females of Biastes emarginatus fly away immediately when they encounter host females at the nests. A conflict situation happens when a host female returns while a Biastes female is inside the nest. The host grabs the parasite with her mandibles and throws her from the nest entrance. No egg was found even when cell walls were carefully checked. The eggs could be well hidden or possibly laid on/in the spherical provision mass. We encountered six first instars of Biastes emarginatus in four cells; two first instars were Figs. 1, 2. Microphotographs of Biastes emar- found on the surface of the food sphere in ginatus. 1. Mature oocyte, lateral view, showing each of two cells and a single first instar was transparent, glassy chorion. 2. First instar appar- found in each of the other two cells. In one ently attacking another first instar. case of dual occupancy one larva appeared to be attacking the other (fig. 2). This discovery obtain mature oocytes and data concerning demonstrates that in two cases two eggs had the number of ovarioles and mature oocytes been deposited in the chamber, but whether by (summarized in table 1). The number of a single female or separate females remains ovarioles is expressed by a notation that unknown. It almost certainly indicates that on provides the number of ovarioles in each of hatching, this species, like most cleptopara- a female’s two ovaries. For example, the sites, immediately rids the host cell of all but ovarian formula 4:4 refers to four ovarioles one individual, as is necessary if there is stored in each of the female’s two ovaries; this food adequate for only one individual. number is the plesiomorphic number for the Apidae (Michener, 2007). One female of B. OVARIAN STATISTICS AND emarginatus possessed an ovarian formula of MATURE OOCYTE 7:6 (or 7) and the other female was 8:8. Although these counts are uncertain because We dissected and later examined the ovaries of difficulty interpreting the maze of ovarioles of two adult females of Biastes emarginatus to on such small specimens, they confirm that 4 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3667 TABLE 1 Egg Indices, Number of Mature Oocytes, and Number Ovarioles of Biastes emarginatus Compared with Other Biastini Figures in first three columns are averages; data for other Biastini from Rozen (2003: table 1).
Recommended publications
  • Xhaie'ican%Mllsllm
    XhAie'ican1ox4tate%Mllsllm PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2 244 MAY I9, I 966 The Larvae of the Anthophoridae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) Part 2. The Nomadinae BY JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.1 The present paper is the second of a series that treats the phylogeny and taxonomy of the larvae belonging to the bee family Anthophoridae. The first (Rozen, 1965a) dealt with the pollen-collecting tribes Eucerini and Centridini of the Anthophorinae. The present study encompasses the following tribes, all of which consist solely of cuckoo bees: Protepeolini, Epeolini, Nomadini, Ammobatini, Holcopasitini, Biastini, and Neolarrini. For reasons presented below, these tribes are believed to represent a monophyletic group, and consequently all are placed in the Nomadinae. It seems likely that the cleptoparasitic tribes Caenoprosopini, Ammoba- toidini, Townsendiellini, Epeoloidini, and Osirini are also members of the subfamily, although their larvae have not as yet been collected. Although the interrelationships of the numerous taxa within the Nomadinae need to be re-evaluated, the tribal concepts used by Michener (1944) are employed here. Adjustments in the classifications will certainly have to be made in the future, however, for Michener (1954) has already indicated, for example, that characters of the adults in the Osirini, the Epeolini, and the Nomadini intergrade. The affinities of the Nomadinae with the other subfamilies of the Antho- phoridae will be discussed in the last paper of the series. Because of char- 1 Curator, Department of Entomology, the American Museum of Natural History. 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Suctorial Proboscis in Pollen Wasps (Masarinae, Vespidae)
    Arthropod Structure & Development 31 (2002) 103–120 www.elsevier.com/locate/asd Evolution of the suctorial proboscis in pollen wasps (Masarinae, Vespidae) Harald W. Krenna,*, Volker Maussb, John Planta aInstitut fu¨r Zoologie, Universita¨t Wien, Althanstraße 14, A-1090, Vienna, Austria bStaatliches Museum fu¨r Naturkunde, Abt. Entomologie, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany Received 7 May 2002; accepted 17 July 2002 Abstract The morphology and functional anatomy of the mouthparts of pollen wasps (Masarinae, Hymenoptera) are examined by dissection, light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, supplemented by field observations of flower visiting behavior. This paper focuses on the evolution of the long suctorial proboscis in pollen wasps, which is formed by the glossa, in context with nectar feeding from narrow and deep corolla of flowers. Morphological innovations are described for flower visiting insects, in particular for Masarinae, that are crucial for the production of a long proboscis such as the formation of a closed, air-tight food tube, specializations in the apical intake region, modification of the basal articulation of the glossa, and novel means of retraction, extension and storage of the elongated parts. A cladistic analysis provides a framework to reconstruct the general pathways of proboscis evolution in pollen wasps. The elongation of the proboscis in context with nectar and pollen feeding is discussed for aculeate Hymenoptera. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mouthparts; Flower visiting; Functional anatomy; Morphological innovation; Evolution; Cladistics; Hymenoptera 1. Introduction Some have very long proboscides; however, in contrast to bees, the proboscis is formed only by the glossa and, in Evolution of elongate suctorial mouthparts have some species, it is looped back into the prementum when in occurred separately in several lineages of Hymenoptera in repose (Bradley, 1922; Schremmer, 1961; Richards, 1962; association with uptake of floral nectar.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini)
    JHR 69: 23–37 (2019)Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia... 23 doi: 10.3897/jhr.69.32966 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini) Silas Bossert1,2 1 Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 2 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA Corresponding author: Silas Bossert ([email protected]) Academic editor: Michael Ohl | Received 10 January 2019 | Accepted 21 March 2019 | Published 30 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/F30BBBB6-7C9C-44F0-A1C6-531C1521D3EC Citation: Bossert S (2019) Monotypic no more – a new species of the unusual genus Schwarzia (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Biastini). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 69: 23–37. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.69.32966 Abstract Schwarzia elizabethae Bossert, sp. n., a previously unknown species of the enigmatic cleptoparasitic genus Schwarzia Eardley, 2009 is described. Both sexes are illustrated and compared to the type species of the genus, Schwarzia emmae Eardley, 2009. The male habitus of S. emmae is illustrated and potential hosts of Schwarzia are discussed. Unusual morphological features of Schwarzia are examined in light of the pre- sumably close phylogenetic relationship to other Biastini. The new species represents the second species of Biastini outside the Holarctic region. Keywords Bees, cleptoparasitism, East Africa Introduction Biastini (Apidae, Nomadinae) is a small tribe of cleptoparasitic bees with just 13 de- scribed species in four genera (Ascher and Pickering 2019). Their distribution is pri- marily Holarctic. Biastes Panzer, 1806 is Palearctic and has five described species.
    [Show full text]
  • Noqvitatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    NoqvitatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3066, 28 pp., 45 figures June 11, 1993 Nesting Biologies and Immature Stages of the Rophitine Bees (Halictidae) with Notes on the Cleptoparasite Biastes (Anthophoridae) (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.' CONTENTS Abstract .......................... 2 Introduction .......................... 2 Nesting Biology of the Rophitinae .......................... 3 Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 3 Conanthalictus conanthi .......................... 11 Rophites trispinosus .......................... 15 Profile of the Biology of the Rophitinae .......................... 16 Mature Larvae of the Rophitinae .......................... 17 Key to the Mature Larvae .......................... 18 Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 18 Conanthalictus conanthi .......................... 21 Rophites trispinosus .......................... 23 Pupa of Sphecodosoma dicksoni .......................... 24 Discussion .......................... 24 References .......................... 26 lCurator, Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History. Copyright C American Museum of Natural History 1993 ISSN 0003-0082 / Price $2.90 2 AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES NO. 3066 ABSTRACT Information on the nesting biology ofthe ground- The mature larvae of the Rophitinae are char- nesting Sphecodosoma dicksoni (Timberlake) and acterized on the basis of six genera, and a key to Conanthalictus conanthi
    [Show full text]
  • Specialization in Plant–Pollinator Networks
    Villalobos et al. BMC Ecol (2019) 19:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0250-z BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Specialization in plant–pollinator networks: insights from local-scale interactions in Glenbow Ranch Provincial Park in Alberta, Canada Soraya Villalobos1* , José Manuel Sevenello‑Montagner2 and Jana C. Vamosi1 Abstract Background: The occurrence and frequency of plant–pollinator interactions are acknowledged to be a function of multiple factors, including the spatio‑temporal distribution of species. The study of pollination specialization by exam‑ ining network properties and more recently incorporating predictors of pairwise interactions is emerging as a useful framework, yet integrated datasets combining network structure, habitat disturbance, and phylogenetic information are still scarce. Results: We found that plant–pollinator interactions in a grassland ecosystem in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains are not randomly distributed and that high levels of reciprocal specialization are generated by biological constraints, such as foral symmetry, pollinator size and pollinator sociality, because these traits lead to morphological or pheno‑ logical mismatching between interacting species. We also detected that landscape degradation was associated with diferences in the network topology, but the interaction webs still maintained a consistently higher number of recip‑ rocal specialization cases than expected. Evidence for the reciprocal evolutionary dependence in visitors (e.g., related pollinators visiting related plants) were weak in this study system, however we identifed key species joining clustered units. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the conserved links with keystone species may provide the foundation for generating local reciprocal specialization. From the general topology of the networks, plant–pollinators interactions in sites with disturbance consisted of generalized nodes connecting modules (i.e., hub and numerous connectors).
    [Show full text]
  • Novltatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    NovltatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3180, 39 pp., 17 figures, 8 tables August 23, 1996 Phylogenetic Analysis of the Cleptoparasitic Bees Belonging to the Nomadinae Based on Mature Larvae (Apoidea: Apidae) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.' CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .............................................................. 3 Historical Background ............................................................ 4 Methodology ...................................................................5 Evaluation of Characters ....................... .................................. 6 Monophyly of the Nomadinae ................ ................................... 10 Phylogeny of the Nomadinae ................ .................................... 12 Analysis 1. Based on larval features alone ...................................... 13 Analysis 2. Based on larval characters from current study and adult characters from Alexander (1990) ................. .................................... 13 Analysis 3. Based on larval characters from current study and adult characters from Roig-Alsina (1991) ................................................... 16 Analysis 4. Based on larval characters from current study and adult characters from Roig-Alsina and Michener (1993) .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Supermatrix Approach to Apoid Phylogeny and Biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1
    Hedtke et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:138 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/138 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The bee tree of life: a supermatrix approach to apoid phylogeny and biogeography Shannon M Hedtke1*, Sébastien Patiny2 and Bryan N Danforth1 Abstract Background: Bees are the primary pollinators of angiosperms throughout the world. There are more than 16,000 described species, with broad variation in life history traits such as nesting habitat, diet, and social behavior. Despite their importance as pollinators, the evolution of bee biodiversity is understudied: relationships among the seven families of bees remain controversial, and no empirical global-level reconstruction of historical biogeography has been attempted. Morphological studies have generally suggested that the phylogeny of bees is rooted near the family Colletidae, whereas many molecular studies have suggested a root node near (or within) Melittidae. Previous molecular studies have focused on a relatively small sample of taxa (~150 species) and genes (seven at most). Public databases contain an enormous amount of DNA sequence data that has not been comprehensively analysed in the context of bee evolution. Results: We downloaded, aligned, concatenated, and analysed all available protein-coding nuclear gene DNA sequence data in GenBank as of October, 2011. Our matrix consists of 20 genes, with over 17,000 aligned nucleotide sites, for over 1,300 bee and apoid wasp species, representing over two-thirds of bee genera. Whereas the matrix is large in terms of number of genes and taxa, there is a significant amount of missing data: only ~15% of the matrix is populated with data.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics the Latest Buzz in Bee Biology No
    Journal of Melittology Bee Biology, Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics The latest buzz in bee biology No. 67, pp. 1–9 20 April 2017 Description of the previously unknown male of Systropha (Austrosystropha) macronasuta (Hymenoptera: Halictidae: Rophitinae) from Kenya Silas Bossert1 & Sébastien Patiny2 Abstract. We describe and illustrate for the first time the previously unknown male ofSystropha (Austrosystropha) macronasuta Strand. We provide a species diagnosis and modified couplets of the recent identification key to allow for easy identification of this sex. Based on the first record of S. macronasuta from the African mainland, we discuss the distribution of the species. INTRODUCTION The genus Systropha Illiger consists of a small but conspicuous group of Old- World halictid bees in the subfamily Rophitinae, a monophyletic group (Patiny et al., 2008). After Dufourea Lepeletier, it is the second most species-rich rophitine genus with a total of 29 species, seven of which have been described in the last two decades (Baker, 1996; de Silva & Packer, 2016; Patiny, 2004; Patiny et al., 2013; Patiny & Michez, 2007). The most recent reviews of the genus were conducted by Ebmer (1994) and Baker (1996). Subsequent studies by Patiny & Michez (2006, 2007) and Patiny et al. (2013) improved our understanding of the phylogeny and biology of the genus by implementing an illustrated subgeneric classification, cladistic analyses, and synoptic keys including all taxa described at that time. Systropha has a wide distribution in the Old World, ranging from South Africa to northern Europe, and reaching western China in its eastward range (Ascher & Pick- ering, 2016; Baker, 1996). They are most abundant in the xeric areas of the Mediter- ranean Region (Michener, 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of the Parasitic Bee Tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)^
    Ac Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 06 October 2004 Number 33:1-51 Phylogeny and classification of the parasitic bee tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)^ By Molly G. Rightmyer y\CZ Division of E)itoiiiologi/, Nntuinl History Museiiui mid Biodizvrsity Rcsenrch Center, jV^Ar^^ and Eiitomology Progrniii, Department of Ecology nnd Evolutionary Biology, The Unii>ersity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66045-7523 CONTENTS ^AB'"^^?Sy ABSTRACT 2 lJHIVE^^^ ' INTRODUCTION 2 Acknowledgments 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 3 METHODS AND MATERIALS 5 MORPHOLOGY 7 PsEUDOPYGiDiAL Area 7 Sting Apparatus 7 Male Internal Sclerites 11 PHYLOGENETIC RESULTS 11 SYSTEMATICS 13 Tribe Epeolini Robertson 13 Subtribe Odyneropsina Handlirsch new status 14 Genus Odyneropsis Schrottky 14 Subgenus Odyneropsis Schrottky new status 15 Subgenus Parammobates Friese new status 15 Rhogepeolina new subtribe 15 Genus Rhogepeolus Moure 15 Rhogepeolina + (Epeolina + Thalestriina) 16 Epeolina + Thalestriina 16 Subtribe Epeolina Robertson new status 16 Genus Epeolus Latreille 16 'Contribution No. 3397 of the Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas. Natural ISSN No. 1094-0782 © History Museum, The University of Kansas _ . «i„,, I <*»ro»V Ernst K'ayr Li^^rary Zoology Museum of Comparawe Harvard University Ac Scientific Papers Natural History Museum The University of Kansas 06 October 2004 NumLx-r 33:1-51 Phylogeny and classification of the parasitic bee tribe Epeolini (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Nomadinae)'
    [Show full text]
  • Melissa 6, January 1993
    The Melittologist's Newsletter Ronald J. McGinley. Bryon N. Danforth. Maureen J. Mello Deportment of Entomology • Smithsonian Institution. NHB-105 • Washington. DC 20560 NUMBER-6 January, 1993 CONTENTS COLLECTING NEWS COLLECTING NEWS .:....:Repo=.:..:..rt=on~Th.:..:.=ird=-=-PC=A..::.;M:.:...E=xp=ed=it=io:..o..n-------=-1 Report on Third PCAM Expedition Update on NSF Mexican Bee Inventory 4 Robert W. Brooks ..;::.LC~;.,;;;....;;...:...:...;....;...;;;..o,__;_;.c..="-'-'-;.;..;....;;;~.....:.;..;.""""""_,;;...;....________,;. Snow Entomological Museum .:...P.:...roposo.a:...::..;:;..,:=..ed;::....;...P_:;C"'-AM~,;::S,;::u.;...;rvc...;;e.L.y-'-A"'"-rea.:o..=s'------------'-4 University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045 Collecting on Guana Island, British Virgin Islands & Puerto Rico 5 The third NSF funded PCAM (Programa Cooperativo so- RESEARCH NEWS bre Ia Apifauna Mexicana) expedition took place from March 23 to April3, 1992. The major goals of this trip were ...:..T.o..:he;::....;...P.:::a::.::ra::.::s;:;;it:..::ic;....;;B::...:e:..:e:....::L=.:e:.:.ia;:;L'{XJd:..::..::..::u;,;;:.s....:::s.:..:.in.:..o~gc::u.:.::/a:o.:n;,;;:.s_____~7 to do springtime collecting in the Chihuahuan Desert and Decline in Bombus terrestris Populations in Turkey 7 Coahuilan Inland Chaparral habitats of northern Mexico. We =:...:::=.:.::....:::..:...==.:.:..:::::..:::.::...:.=.:..:..:=~:....=..~==~..:.:.:.....:..=.:=L-.--=- also did some collecting in coniferous forest (pinyon-juni- NASA Sponsored Solitary Bee Research 8 per), mixed oak-pine forest, and riparian habitats in the Si- ;:...;N:..::.o=tes;.,;;;....;o;,;,n:....:Nc..:.e.::..;st;:.;,i;,:,;n_g....:::b""-y....:.M=-'-e.;;,agil,;;a.;_:;c=h:..:..:ili=d-=B;....;;e....:::e..::.s______.....:::.8 erra Madre Oriental. Hymenoptera Database System Update 9 Participants in this expedition were Ricardo Ayala (Insti- '-'M:.Liss.:..:..:..;;;in..:....:g..;:JB<:..;ee:..::.::.::;.:..,;Pa:::..rt=s=?=::...;:_"'-L..;=c.:.:...c::.....::....::=:..,_----__;:_9 tuto de Biologia, Chamela, Jalisco); John L.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Habitat in Agroecosystems Morgan Mackert Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2019 Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems Morgan Mackert Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Mackert, Morgan, "Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 17255. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17255 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Strategies to improve native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) habitat in agroecosystems by Morgan Marie Mackert A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Mary A. Harris, Co-major Professor John D. Nason, Co-major Professor Robert W. Klaver The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2019 Copyright © Morgan Marie Mackert, 2019. All rights reserved ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... vi CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]