As Defined by Electoral Wards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ANNEX 1 THE PUBLIC CONSTITUENCY Local Authority Area of the Public Constituency Minimum Number of (as defined by electoral wards) Number Governors of to be Members elected Elmbridge Claygate 150 3 (all wards) Cobham and Downside Esher Hersham Village Hinchley Wood and Weston Green Long Ditton Molesey East Molesey West Oatlands and Burwood Park Oxshott and Stoke D’Abernon Walton Central Walton North Walton South Weybridge Riverside Weybridge St George’s Hill Thames Ditton Hounslow and Richmond upon Bedfont 100 2 Thames and Kingston upon Brentford Thames Chiswick Homefields (all wards) Chiswick Riverside Cranford East Sheen Feltham North Feltham West Hanworth Hanworth Park Heston Central Heston East Heston West Hounslow Central Hounslow Heath Hounslow South Hounslow West Isleworth Osterley and Spring Grove Syon Turnham Green Barnes East Sheen Fulwell and Hampton Hill Ham Petersham and Richmond Riverside Hampton Hampton North Hampton Wick Heathfield Kew Mortlake and Barnes Common North Richmond South Richmond South Twickenham St Margarets and North Twickenham, Teddington Twickenham Riverside West Twickenham Whitton Alexandra Berrylands Beverley Canbury Chessington North and Hook Chessington South Coombe Hill Coombe Vale Grove Norbiton Old Malden St Marks St James Surbiton Hill Tolworth and Hook Rise Tudor Runnymede and Addlestone Bourneside 150 3 Windsor & Maidenhead Addlestone North (all wards) Chertsey Meads Chertsey South and Row Town Chertsey St. Ann's Egham Hythe Egham Town Englefield Green East Englefield Green West Foxhills New Haw Thorpe Virginia Water Woodham Ascot and Cheapside Belmont Bisham and Cookham Boyn Hill Bray Castle Without Clewer East Clewer North Clewer South Cox Green Datchet Eton and Castle Eton Wick Furze Platt Horton and Wraysbury Hurley and Walthams Maidenhead Riverside Old Windsor Oldfield, Park Pinkneys Green Sunningdale Sunninghill and South Ascot Spelthorne Ashford Common 150 3 (all wards) Ashford East Ashford North and Stanwell South Ashford Town Halliford and Sunbury West Laleham and Shepperton Green Riverside and Laleham Shepperton Town Staines South Staines Stanwell North Sunbury Common Sunbury East Surrey Heath Bagshot 50 1 (all wards) Bisley Chobham Frimley Frimley Green Heatherside Lightwater Mytchett and Deepcut Old Dean, Parkside St Michaels St Pauls Town Watchetts West End Windlesham Woking and Guildford Byfleet and West Byfleet 150 3 (all wards) Canalside Goldsworth Park Heathlands Hoe Valley Horsell Knaphill Mount Hermon Pyrford St John’s Ash South and Tongham Ash Vale Ash Wharf Burpham Christchurch Clandon and Horsley Effingham Friary and St Nicolas Holy Trinity Lovelace Merrow Normandy Onslow Pilgrims Pirbright Send Shalford Stoke Stoughton Tillingbourne Westborough Worplesdon Rest of Surrey All other areas of Surrey not included above.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

PER WG 260601.Doc AGENDA
N O T I C E O F M E E T I N G PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP will meet on TUESDAY 26 JUNE 2001 At 8.00 pm in MEETING ROOM 'A', TOWN HALL, ST. IVES ROAD, MAIDENHEAD TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW WORKING GROUP (For action) COUNCILLORS LAWRENCE (CHAIRMAN), MRS BATESON (VICE-CHAIRMAN), BURBAGE, MRS ENDACOTT, MRS GLIKSTEN, MRS KEMP, OLNEY, MRS QUICK, WERNER AND WILES. c.c. Chief Executive, Borough Secretary, Andrew Scott, Rob Curtis and Sue Goddard. Barry Morfett Head of Corporate Administration Issued: Tuesday 26th June 2001 BJM/ag mins reps/PER WG 260601.doc AGENDA PART I ITEM SUBJECT WARD PAGE NO 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE To receive any apologies for absence. 2. AREAS FOR RECONSIDERATION To look further at certain areas as requested by Members at the last meeting viz:- Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Cookham/Bisham Cox Green/Woodlands Park and Hurley Windsor Urban Area Maidenhead Urban Area NB. The proposals submitted by the Liberal Democrat Group have been summarised in the above report. Details of their proposals have been attched as an Appendix. BJM/ag mins reps/PER WG 260601.doc 2. AREAS FOR RECONSIDERATION At the Working Group meeting on 21 June, it was agreed that further consideration should be given to detailed options provided by Members of the Working Group in relation to the following areas:- Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Cookham and Bisham Cox Green, Woodlands Park and Hurley Windsor Urban Area Maidenhead Urban Area Members will recall that at the meeting on 21 June, the officers provided proposals for each of the areas in question and the following report provides details not only of the proposals originally but also the options supplied by individual Members.
[Show full text]
Report Title: Horton and Wraysbury Neighbourhood Plan Decision To
Report Title: Horton and Wraysbury Neighbourhood Plan decision to proceed to referendum Contains Confidential or No - Part I Exempt Information? Member reporting: Councillor Coppinger, Lead Member for Planning & Maidenhead Meeting and Date: Cabinet - 31 October 2019 Responsible Officer(s): Russell O'Keefe, Executive Director Wards affected: Horton and Wraysbury REPORT SUMMARY 1. This report seeks approval from Cabinet for the Horton and Wraysbury Neighbourhood Plan to proceed to referendum at the earliest practicable opportunity. 2. The Neighbourhood Plan has been formally examined by an independent examiner, and a number of changes have been recommended by the examiner to ensure that the plan meets the basic conditions. 3. The cost of the referendum can be claimed back from the government up to a cap of £20,000. 1. DETAILS OF RECOMMENDATION(S) RECOMMENDATION: That Cabinet notes the report and: i) Confirms that the plan meets the Basic Conditions tests and an SEA is not required. ii) Accepts the proposed changes to the Neighbourhood Plan set out in Appendix B. a. Gives delegated authority to the Head of Planning (or person acting as Interim Head of Planning) to issue a decision statement; and b. agrees to put the modified Neighbourhood Plan to referendum. The date of the referendum to be set in accordance with the legal requirements; and iii) Delegates authority to the Head of Planning (or Interim Head of Planning), in consultation with the Lead Member for Planning, to make minor, non material, amendments to the Neighbourhood Plan prior to the referendum being announced. iv) The LPA will provide advance funding up to £20,000, if required, for the referendum; this will then be claimed back from Government.
[Show full text]
12B High Street Brochure
YEW COTTAGE SUNNINGDALE • SL5 YEW COTTAGE SUNNINGDALE • SL5 4 bedroom detached family home in Sunningdale Entrance hall • Sitting room Dining room • Conservatory • Kitchen/breakfast room Bedroom 4 with en suite shower room • Cloakroom Master bedroom • Bedrooms 2 & 3 with Jack and Jill bathroom • Family bathroom Garden • Summer house Sunningdale station 1.3 miles providing regular services to London ﴾Waterloo﴿ in approximately 50 minutes • Ascot High Street 2.6 miles • Windsor 7.7 miles • Heathrow Airport 14 miles • Central London 26 miles ﴿All distances and times are approximate﴾ These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the text. ADDRESS Yew Cottage, 12B High Street, Sunningdale, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 0LU. Situation Yew Cottage is located close to Sunningdale High Street with its Waitrose, further range of shops and local amenities. Schools: We are very fortunate to have a fantastic selection of schooling in the local area including Charters School and many renowned private schools including Eton College, Papplewick, Sunningdale, St. Mary's, Heathfield, Hurst Lodge, St George's, St. John's Beaumont. In addition there is the American .Community School ﴾ACS﴿ and TASIS Entertainment: Golf courses at Sunningdale, Swinley Forest, The Berkshire and Wentworth. Polo at Smiths Lawn and The Royal Berkshire. Health clubs at Berystede, Coworth Park and Pennyhill Park. Cinemas and theatres at Camberley and Windsor. Restaurants: There is a good selection of restaurants in the area including Coworth Park, Ascot Grill, Bluebells and Pennyhill Park. Walking & Riding: Many walks in the area including Windsor Great Park, Chobham Common, Virginia Water Park and riding facilities.
[Show full text]
Bbartletts House
Bartletts House Holyport,B Berkshire Bartletts House Bartletts Lane, Holyport,B Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 2JD A fine Georgian residence which offers extensive accommodation alongside superb equestrian facilities, set within private gardens and grounds of about 17 acres Maidenhead ~ 2.5 miles, Windsor ~ 5.5 miles, Ascot ~ 8 miles, Henley ~ 11 miles, M4 (J8/9) ~ 2 miles, Heathrow ~ 12.5 miles, Central London ~ 30 miles (All mileages are approximate) Main House Reception Hall, Drawing Room, Dining Room, Games Room, Family Room, Study, Library, Kitchen/ Breakfast Room, Larder, Boot Room, Laundry Room, Master Bedroom Suite with Dressing Room, Vanity Room and En Suite Bathroom, 7 Further Bedrooms 2 of which have en suite facilities, 2 further Bathrooms Ancillary Accommodation Cottage comprising: Reception Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms (1 with En Suite Bathroom), Shower Room Gardens & Grounds Lime Tree Driveway, Extensive Lawns, Formal Garden, Kitchen Garden, Outdoor Swimming Pool, Pergola, Garaging & Boiler Room Equestrian Facilities Stabling, Tack Room, Feed Store, Machinery Store/Workshop, Groom’s Accommodation, Stick and Ball Field, Exercise Track, Paddocks and Meadow Freehold 10,630 sq ft Description Bartletts House is an imposing country In addition the library with double aspect residence of the Georgian era with garden views and open fire makes for a later skilful and sympathetic additions ‘cosy’ place to retreat. The family room with combining to create a substantial and attractive Chesneys limestone fireplace and elegant family home. Electronically study provide additional reception space. operated wooden gates open onto a lime tree driveway, providing a leafy canopy The superb kitchen/breakfast room has and drawing the line of vision to the a lovely feel and is a real feature of this house, thereby creating a striking and wonderful home.
[Show full text]
Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
[Show full text]
Windsor Neighbourhood Area and Forum Application
Tel: 01753 855106 14a Bolton Crescent Windsor Berkshire SL4 3JQ 15th May 2014 Planning Policy Manager Planning & Property Services Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead St Ives Road Maidenhead Berkshire SL6 1LF Dear Sir, Application for Windsor to be designated as a Neighbourhood Area and the Windsor Neighbourhood Plan Forum to be considered as the relevant body to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan Under the terms of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (“the Act”) Part 2& 3, we submit this application to the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead (RBWM) for a Neighbourhood Area designation and a Neighbourhood Forum. Name The name of the proposed neighbourhood forum will be the Windsor Neighbourhood Plan (WNP) Forum. Constitution A copy of the draft constitution of the proposed forum is attached. This document was submitted to those present at an inaugural meeting held on Thursday 8th May 2014, together with a request for comments which will be reviewed at our next scheduled meeting in June. Map The name of the neighbourhood area to which the application relates is Windsor and a map which identifies the area is attached as [1 of 2]. The application relates to the unparished wards of Castle Without, Clewer East, Clewer North & Clewer South (excluding parished areas covered by Bray Parish), Eton and Castle (excluding the parished area covered by Eton Town Council) and Park but excluding an area which is the subject of a separate application which will be submitted by the Central Windsor Neighbourhood Plan (CWNP) for Business group. A second map [2 of 2] is enclosed which shows the proposed separate Business Area submission.
[Show full text]
Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan
Designed by Jaijo Design. Maps 1 – 3, 6 – 12, 14 – 25 © Crown copyright and database right RBWM100018817 2014 & Ordnance Survey Open-Data. Maps 4 & 5 RBWM © 100018817. Maps 13 from The Prince’s Foundation Enquiry by Design. Photographs by kind permission of Peter Deason, Martin Baker and other members of the Neighbourhood Plan team. Introduction from the Co-Chairs of the Steering Group Welcome on behalf of the Steering Group for the Ascot, Sunninghill and Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan. In early 2010, the two Parishes of Sunninghill & Ascot and Sunningdale were offered a great opportunity by the Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead to come together and become a Front Runner Neighbourhood Plan, as enabled by the government’s Localism proposals. It’s been a long journey of 3 years, with full-scale consultation leading to the delivery of this Plan. The Ascot, Sunninghill & Sunningdale Neighbourhood Plan (NP) Steering Group has been led by local residents (volunteers), with the aim of preparing a Plan that will deliver the long term goals of a balanced and vibrant neighbourhood. Since September 2010 we have held many public meetings, online and paper consultations, to seek the views of local residents and other stakeholders, groups and businesses who share an interest in our neighbourhood area. An active website has allowed everyone to keep up to date with our progress and to make contact with us. All involved in developing the Neighbourhood Plan have listened very carefully to all the feedback received through all these consultations and have worked hard to ensure that the Plan incorporates and reflects the views of the community.
[Show full text]
Overview of Bridge Maintenance and Strengthening Works for 11-12
Overview of Bridge Maintenance and Strengthening Works for 11-12 General Management of Bridges/Structures The Royal Borough undertakes regular inspections of bridges and other highway structures to ensure public safety under the Highways Act section 41 in accordance with bridge code of practice 2005. These inspections identify works related to the condition of the structure and make recommendations for refurbishment, replacement or maintenance. Regular works include assessments that feed into the strengthening works programme; asset management activities to improve the processes for management of the structures’ stock and any temporary weight limits required prior to strengthening. These assessments may also consider the suitability of a structure to carry an abnormal load (e.g. mobile cranes). The Code of Practice for Highway Structures has also identified the need to complete detailed structural reviews of bridges every 12 years, to ensure that the load assessment remains to current standards, and is based on the current condition of the bridge. The following five structures assessments are overdue and have been identified as requiring an updated assessment in 2011/12 to comply with the National Requirements, and ensure they remain safe and serviceable. B418 Broomhall Lane – Sunningdale B422 Charters road – Sunningdale B425 Howe lane - Holyport B879 Plough Inn, B376 Horton road – Datchet B896 Fifteen Arch B3022 Slough Road - Eton. The assessment of these bridges would include determining both the safe load capacity of the bridges and any recommended repairs. Total costs for assessments to these 5 structures are £50,000 Specific Priority Works 2011/12 CG10 Blacknest Bridge, A329 London Road, Ascot. Blacknest Bridge carries the A329 London Road over a stream.
[Show full text]
Horton and Wraysbury Character Assessment
Horton and Wraysbury Character Assessment June 2015 Horton and Wraysbury Parish Councils Contents 1. Introduction 2. Landscape Setting 3. Townscape Character Appendix 1: RBWM Landscape Character Assessment, 2004 - Extracts Relevant to Horton and Wraysbury 1 INTRODUCTION About this document This document, prepared by Horton and Wraysbury Parish Councils, provides an overview of the character and key qualities that define the built up areas of the parishes of Horton and Wraysbury. It has been produced as one part of a larger project – the Horton and Wraysbury Neighbourhood Development Plan. Once adopted, the Neighbourhood Development Plan will be used by the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead when considering planning applications which are submitted within the designated area. This Character Assessment supports the design and character policies progressed within the Neighbourhood Development Plan, and will help to ensure that development proposals are designed in a manner which is complimentary to and reinforces the distinct and special character of Horton and Wraysbury. 2 LANDSCAPE SETTING An aquatic landscape The Parishes of Horton and Wraysbury lie in a landscape which is largely shaped and characterised by water features. These water features take a variety of forms, and include: The River Thames; Wraysbury Reservoir and the Queen Mother Reservoir; and ‘Man-made’ lakes formed from disused gravel pits. The River Thames lies to west of Wraysbury, and in this area diverges into the New Cut, the Colne Brook and some unnamed tributaries. Lakes of varying sizes, originating from former gravel workings are a particular feature (during the 1930’s, due to the presence of huge quantities of gravel in this area, farming started to give way to the minerals extraction industry).
[Show full text]
Eton Community Association
Dear Sir/Madam, At a recent meeting of representatives from Eton Community Association, we talked about commenting on the proposed Ward Boundaries as they affect Eton Town Council, which includes the current wards of Eton and Castle, and Eton Wick. Option D is of significant concern. This is not aligned with the Eton Community nor indeed the Eton & Eton Wick Neighbourhood Plan, which is currently out for consultation with the submission version (Regulation 16). We are aware that the Eton & Eton Wick Town Council is opposed to option D too. These are reasons that give cause for concern: 1 The proposal seems to be based on only one of the 3 criteria to be considered, namely numbers of voters. The criteria of relevance to the community seens to have been disregarded. 2 Eton with Eton Wick is a self-contained community with absolutely no relationship with Datchet and Horton. 3 The community has just completed a Neighbourhood Plan for Eton and Eton Wick combined, and a huge amount of time, hard work and money will go to waste by attaching two new whole communities to it. Having attended the adjoining Neighbourhood Plan local consultations, my colleagues and I have good knowledge of various NPs, including Windsor 2030, Outer Windsor, Horton & Wraysbury. It is clear that our alignment with and inter-relationship with Windsor is strong. We have no such relationship with Wraysbury or Datchet. 4 Our two existing Ward Councillors have worked tirelessly for Eton and Eton Wick, each being responsible for one of the Wards. This system has served the community well and to change into a multi-dimensional system with several councillors looking after a conglomerate of diverse communities gives cause for concern.
[Show full text]
Minutes Template
COUNCIL - 23.07.19 AT A MEETING OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL held in the Grey Room, York House, Windsor on Tuesday, 23rd July, 2019 PRESENT: Councillors Luxton (The Mayor), Muir (Deputy Mayor) and Baldwin, Baskerville, Bateson, Bhangra, Bond, Bowden, Brar, Cannon, Carroll, Clark, Coppinger, C. Da Costa, W. Da Costa, Davey, Davies, Del Campo, Dudley, Haseler, Hilton, Hunt, Johnson, Jones, Knowles, Larcombe, McWilliams, Price, Rayner, Reynolds, Sharpe, Shelim, Singh, Stimson, Story, Targowski, Taylor, Tisi, Walters and Werner Officers: Duncan Sharkey, Mary Severin, Russell O'Keefe, Karen Shepherd, Barbara Richardson, Chris Pearse and Maddie Pinkham. 22. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Hill. 23. COUNCIL MINUTES RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY: That the Part I minutes of the meeting held on 25 June 2019 be approved, subject to the following amendment: Page 29 , paragraph 2 to read: ‘…..The Director of Adult Social Care and the Assistant Director of Statutory Care had advised him of the unavoidable issues relating to safeguarding and health and safety in relation to the motion…..’ 24. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Councillor McWilliams declared a personal interest on Item 7 as he owned a property in Kings Walk. He had taken legal advice and was able to take part in the debate and voting on the item. Councillor Hunt declared a personal interest in Item 7 as she owned a property in the town centre. She had taken legal advice and was able to take part in the debate and voting on the item. Councillor Dudley placed on record his thanks, on behalf of the council, to the Maidenhead constituency MP Theresa May for her just over three years as Prime Minister.
[Show full text]
Anonymous Submissions to the Elmbridge Borough Council Electoral Review
Anonymous submissions to the Elmbridge Borough Council electoral review This PDF document contains 21 submissions from all Anonymous submissions. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. From: Sent: 17 July 2015 14:58 To: reviews Cc: Subject: Hersham Ward Boundary Changes - Objection Letter. The Review Officer (Elmbridge) Local Government Boundary Commission for England 14th Floor, Millbank Tower London SW1P 4QP Hersham Ward Boundary Changes - Objection Letter. Dear Sir or Madam, We object to the merging of Burwood park into Oatlands Park Ward for the reasons stated below. 1. The proposed boundary changes move Burwood Park from an orientation to Hersham Village, to which it shares a postcode, to Oatlands, from which it is physically separated by a railway line. 2. Burwood Park has an affinity with Hersham Village due to the rural nature of the community compared to Oatlands, which is a residential area with no natural centre. Residents of Burwood Park use the facilities of Hersham Village for shopping, the library, the doctor’s surgery and the Park lies within the parish of St Peter’s Church. The proposed new Wards are therefore not orientated correctly. 3. There is a risk that future Burwood Park planning issues will be considered in a residential context rather than the rural environment, which exists today. The current Hersham orientated local councillors understand and fully support the interests of Burwood Park residents. 4. The proposed boundary change to move Burwood Park into the Oatlands Ward, results in a change in parliamentary boundary - from Esher and Walton to Weybridge and Runnymede.
[Show full text]