Download Hints Http :// 1 6/I3 2 1-3 0.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Hints Http :// 1 6/I3 2 1-3 0.Pdf AN ABSTRACT OF THE PROJECT REPORT OF Kurt Schultz for the degree of Master of Science in Marine Resource Management presented on March 15, 2006. A Survey of Aquatic Nonindigenous Species (ANS) in the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers and an Investigation into Pathways of Introduction. Noimative invasive species pose a growing threat to living aquatic resources in the United States. Shippingparticularly use of ballast water represents a major pathway of introduction for these species and in 1996, Congress established a program of baseline surveys to measure the effectiveness of ballast water management. This report describes a three part project: a literature survey conducted to help identify native and non-native species present in the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers; an investigation of ship and barge ballasting practices on the rivers; and an evaluation of whether baseline surveys are appropriate measures of successful ballast water control. The first part of the project entailed a comprehensive literature review for the Middle ColumbialLower Snake Rivers Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Survey (MCRANS) which will be used to help establish a baseline for the presence of both native and non-native species in the main stems of the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers, and to assist in the development of a field sampling plan to monitor for potential introductions of nonindigenous species to these waters. Technical project reports, collection records, databases, and "gray literature" from various federal, state, and local agencies, academic institutions, and industries were researched to compile the lists of species present in the system. A listing of 781 organisms was tabulated from these resources, of which approximately 377 distinct organisms were identified to at least genus level, and of these 377, 44 were identified as nonnative to the system. During the MCRANS literature review, several papers were discovered in which appearances or discoveries of new species in various stretches of the rivers were attributed to introductions via ballast waters from tug and barge traffic. The second part of this project entailed an investigation of ballasting procedures by commercial tug and barge companies, governmental shipping contractors, and commercial cruise line companies. However, interviews revealed that river tugs and barges do not routinely take on or discharge ballast waters during shipping operations as was widely believed outside of the shipping industry. The one exception involves Navy barges which carry spent nuclear reactors (and possibly ballast water) from the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard up the Columbia River to the Port of Benton, in Richland Washington, where they undertake limited ballasting operations while unloading their cargo. Review of other baseline surveys revealed ambiguities that make pathway assignments for ANS difficult, including inconsistent methods and terminology used for monitoring, sampling and identification, uneven temporal and spatial distribution of surveys, and apparent spikes in vectors that may simply reflect increases in strengths of sampling efforts. ly, this project resulted in the recognition that creation of a group or focused on ANS issues in the Columbia River basin, is needed to gional coordination and collaboration for ANS monitoring and nd for management of ANS pathways related to Columbia River shipping activities. © Copywright by Kurt Schultz March 15, 2006 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many here at OSU who have played an important role in my graduate education. I would especially like to thank my major advisor Paul Heimowitz for the wealth of knowledge regarding invasive species he has imparted to me. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Jim Good and Michael Harte, for their contribution to my knowledge of matters in the area of Marine Resource Management and for their guidance in shaping my project. I would like to thank the College of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences staff, including Irma Delson, Joy Burke, Laurie Jodice, Ken Hall, Bob Duncan, Lori Hartline, and Robert Allan for their guidance in helping me navigate through graduate school at OSU, and I would like to thank Robyn Draheim and Mark Sytsma at the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for the opportunity and funding to work on the first part of this project. Thanks also go to Steve Parker and Brett Weidoff of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and Tim Cowles of OSU for providing emergency summer employment when my funding fell through, in positions that increased my knowledge of marine fisheries management and biological oceanography. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family and Keni for the love and support that helped make this part of my life possible. Thank you all. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction.! Nonindigenous Species ......................................................... 1 Introductions and successful establishments of ANS ....................... 4 Chapter 2. Objectives ................................................................ 6 1). Carry out a literature search to identifj all nonnative aquatic species documented in the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers to support a baseline Survey by Portland State University ................. 6 2). Investigate tug and barge ballasting operations on the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers ........................................ 8 3). Evaluate the ability to use baseline ANS surveys as a measure of effectiveness of managing ballast water (or other ANS pathways). ...9 Chapter 3. Background .............................................................. 10 Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species .......................................... 10 Effects and Potential Risks of Aquatic Nonindigenous Species in the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers .................................. 11 BallastWater......................................................................18 Ballast Water Exchange.........................................................20 International Ballast Water Management Regulations......................24 United States Ballast Water Management Regulations ..................... 26 West Coast (U.S.) Ballast Water Management Regulations ................ 29 Chapter 4. Methods..................................................................31 1. Literature search for the Middle Columbia/Lower Snake Rivers Aquatic Nonindigenous Species Survey (MCRANS)....................31 2. Investigation of Ballasting Operations on the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers..........................................................35 3. Evaluation of Pathway and Vector Assignments ......................... 37 Chapter 5. Results and Discussion ................................................. 38 1. Results of Literature Search and MCRANS Baseline Data ............. 38 MCRANS System Description ....................................... 38 Summary of Past Biological Surveys ................................ 40 2. Investigation of Commercial River Traffic and Ballasting Operations ..................................................................... 47 lJpriver Cargo Movements............................................50 Downriver Cargo Movements........................................51 Investigation of Ballasting Records and Regulations .............. 52 3. Evaluation of Pathway Assignments ....................................... 63 Introductions to the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake Rivers....................................................................70 Determination of Timing of Introductions ......................... 72 Clarity of ANS Status.................................................74 Vectors and Pathways ................................................. 75 Changes in Recipient Regions: Dams, Flow Regimes, and Habitat Changes........................................................79 Disturbances and Invasions..........................................79 Stochastic Inoculation Events and Propagule Supply Hypotheses .............................................................. 84 Dispersal Vector Changes: Increased Inoculation Frequencies due to Increased Barge (and other vessel) Traffic.................86 Chapter 6. Conclusions.............................................................88 1. General Conclusions.........................................................88 Distribution of ANS in the Middle Columbia and Lower SnakeRivers............................................................88 Transport of ANS Related to Tug and Barge Ballasting Operations...............................................................89 Use of Baseline Surveys to Evaluate and Assign Introduction Pathways................................................................90 2. Management Implications of ANS Introductions into the Middle Columbia and Lower Snake River Systems and Recommendations for Future Management Activities ........................................ 93 3. Recommendations for Further Research .................................. 95 NOBOB Research: Navy Barges and Fish Barges ................. 96 Downstream Transport of River Water by Truck .................. 97 Cruise Ship Ballasting Investigation ................................. 97 Bilges and Live Wells of Commercial and Recreational Vessels...................................................................97 Hull Fouling Studies...................................................98
Recommended publications
  • Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plan
    DOE/RL-96-32 Revision 2 Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plan Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited This page intentionally left blank. DOE/RL-96-32 Revision 2 Hanford Site Biological Resources Management Plan Date Published February 2017 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 By Janis Aardal at 12:39 pm, Feb 21, 2017 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America DOE/RL 96-32 Revision 2 Executive Summary Resource stewardship is an integral part of consistent approach to protect and manage U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) biological resources on the site. Essential responsibilities at the Hanford Site. aspects of Hanford biological resource Appropriate management strategies and management include resource monitoring, actions, based on the best scientific information impact assessment, mitigation, and restoration. available, are important components of The BRMP’s overarching goals are to: stewardship and land-use planning at the site. • Foster preservation of important The Hanford Site Biological Resources biological resources. Management Plan (BRMP) is DOE’s primary implementation plan for managing natural • Minimize adverse impacts to biological resources under the Hanford Comprehensive resources from site development and Land-Use Plan (CLUP).
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I
    Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I November 4 - 7, 2002 Richland, WA FINAL REPORT A Collaborative Workshop: United States Fish & Wildlife Service The Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (SSC/IUCN) Hanford Reach National Monument 1 Planning Workshop I, November 2002 A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group in collaboration with the United States Fish & Wildlife Service. CBSG. 2002. Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I. FINAL REPORT. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. 2 Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I, November 2002 Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I November 4-7, 2002 Richland, WA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. Executive Summary 1 A. Introduction and Workshop Process B. Draft Vision C. Draft Goals 2. Understanding the Past 11 A. Personal, Local and National Timelines B. Timeline Summary Reports 3. Focus on the Present 31 A. Prouds and Sorries 4. Exploring the Future 39 A. An Ideal Future for Hanford Reach National Monument B. Goals Appendix I: Plenary Notes 67 Appendix II: Participant Introduction questions 79 Appendix III: List of Participants 87 Appendix IV: Workshop Invitation and Invitation List 93 Appendix V: About CBSG 103 Hanford Reach National Monument 3 Planning Workshop I, November 2002 4 Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I, November 2002 Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I November 4-7, 2002 Richland, WA Section 1 Executive Summary Hanford Reach National Monument 5 Planning Workshop I, November 2002 6 Hanford Reach National Monument Planning Workshop I, November 2002 Executive Summary A. Introduction and Workshop Process Introduction to Comprehensive Conservation Planning This workshop is the first of three designed to contribute to the Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) of Hanford Reach National Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • 612 Natural History Notes
    612 NATURAL HISTORY NOTES ruber and Rhinella crucifer (Souza-Júnior et al. 1991. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 51:585–588). The specimens of G. chabaudi (males) identi- fied herein possess the diagnostic characters of this species, es- pecially three pairs of genital papillae: one preanal pair, another postanal, laterally projecting and a third ventral pair located in a short, subulated and coiled tail. In this note, the distribution of G. chabaudi is expanded and P. platensis is a new host record. We are grateful to Marissa Fabrezi (Instituto de Biología y Geociencias del NOA-Salta) for identifying the tadpoles. GABRIEL CASTILLO, Universidad Nacional de San Juan Argentina. Di- versidad y Biología de Vertebrados del Árido, Departamento de Biología, San Juan, Argentina (e-mail: [email protected]); GERALDINE RA- MALLO, Instituto de Invertebrados, Fundación Miguel Lillo, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina (e-mail: [email protected]); CHARLES R. BURSEY, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Biology, Shenango Campus, Sharon, Pennsylvania 16146, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); STE- PHEN R. GOLDBERG, Whittier College, Department of Biology, Whittier, California 90608, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); JUAN CARLOS ACOSTA, Universidad Nacional de San Juan Argentina. Diversidad y Bi- ología de Vertebrados del Árido, Departamento de Biología, San Juan, Ar- gentina (e-mail: [email protected]). PSEUDOPHILAUTUS AMBOLI (Amboli Bush Frog). PREDA- TION BY TERRESTRIAL BEETLE LARVAE. Amphibians are im- portant prey for numerous arthropod taxa, including ground beetles (Toledo 2005. Herpetol. Rev. 36:395–399; Bernard and Samolg 2014. Entomol. Fennica 25:157–160). Previous studies have shown that Epomis larvae feed exclusively on amphibians and display a unique luring behavior in order to attract their prey FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford, the River &
    Hanford, the river & you • River Corridor • Central Plateau • Hanford Reach National Monument Preserve Get involved! Your voice is important to ensure safe, continued, and timely cleanup of the Hanford Site and keeping the Columbia River safe. Protect How? Try: • Attending public meetings • Commenting during public comment periods • Watching our website for information • Inviting us to speak to your organization Restore Questions? Ecology.wa.gov/Hanford Nuclear Waste Program EcologyWAHanford 3100 Port of Benton Blvd. I] Richland, WA 99354 @ecyHanford a DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY State of Washington To request ADA accommodation including materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at 509-372-7950 or visit https://ecology.wa.gov/ accessibility. People with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. People with speech disability may call TTY at 877-833-6341. Ecology Publication Number 05-05-005, Rev. 4, March 2019 The Columbia River The 1,243-long-mile Columbia starts in British Columbia, Canada, flows through Washington forming the border between Washington and Oregon, and empties into the Pacific ocean. Through the centuries it has played an important part in the economy and culture of the region. The Hanford Reach is the last non-tidal, free-flowing section of the Columbia River in the United States. This portion of the river borders the Hanford site and supports over 40 species of fish and other wildlife. It was made into a national monument in 2000. Because of the security requirements of the Hanford site, much of this area has not been developed since 1943. The Columbia has a rich history of supporting the people who lived along its banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project—FERC Project No
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AMENDING LICENSE TO MODIFY RIGHT EMBANKMENT OF THE PRIEST RAPIDS DAM Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project—FERC Project No. 2114-303 Washington Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 AMENDMENT REQUEST AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................... 7 A. Amendment Request .................................................................................................. 7 B. Need for Action .......................................................................................................... 8 1.3 PRE-FILING CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC NOTICE ....................................... 8 1.4. STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS...................................... 10 1.4.1 Section 18 Fishway Prescription ...................................................................... 10 1.4.2 Endangered Species Act ................................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act .................... 11 1.4.4 National Historic
    [Show full text]
  • District 4 Hunting Prospects 2019
    2019 JASON FIDORRA, District Wildlife Biologist DISTRICT 4 HUNTING PROSPECTS Benton and Franklin counties TABLE OF CONTENTS DISTRICT 4 GENERAL OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 1 ELK ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 DEER ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 UPLAND BIRD ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 PHEASANT .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 QUAIL ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 DOVE .......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 WATERFOWL ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 MAJOR PUBLIC LANDS .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE), Mcgee Ranch/Riverlands, and North Slope Units
    PNNL-13989 Historical Site Assessment: Select Hanford Reach National Monument Lands — Fitzner/Eberhardt Arid Lands Ecology Reserve (ALE), McGee Ranch/Riverlands, and North Slope Units B. G. Fritz R. L. Dirkes T. M. Poston R. W. Hanf July 2003 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 78355381012.Pdf
    Revista de Bioética y Derecho ISSN: 1886-5887 Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética Villamor Iglesias, Alejandro The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature Revista de Bioética y Derecho, no. 42, 2018, January-April, pp. 181-195 Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78355381012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature - Alejandro Villamor Iglesias Rev Bio y Der. 2018; 42: 181-195 Revista de Bioética y Derecho Perspectivas Bioéticas www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu - ISSN 1886-5887 BIOÉTICA ANIMAL The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature La abrumadora prevalencia del sufrimiento en la naturaleza L'aclaparant prevalença del patiment a la naturalesa ALEJANDRO VILLAMOR IGLESIAS * OBSERVATORI DE BIOÈTICA I DRET DE LA UNIVERSITAT DE BARCELONA La Revista de Bioética y Derecho se creó en 2004 a iniciativa del Observatorio de Bioética y Derecho (OBD), con el soporte del Máster en Bioética y Derecho de la Universidad de Barcelona: www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu/master. En 2016 la revista Perspectivas Bioéticas del Programa de Bioética de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) se ha incorporado a la Revista de Bioética y Derecho. Esta es una revista electrónica de acceso abierto, lo que significa que todo el contenido es de libre acceso sin coste alguno para el usuario o su institución.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Optic, 04-08-1914 the Optic Publishing Co
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 4-8-1914 Las Vegas Optic, 04-08-1914 The Optic Publishing Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news Recommended Citation The Optic Publishing Co.. "Las Vegas Optic, 04-08-1914." (1914). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/lvdo_news/2271 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Las Vegas Daily Optic, 1896-1907 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTCRICALSOCITEY COLD tonight and THOSE .Illinois' women Thursday, with possib- jj a mean trick Sj ility of more snow. on the men who gave i Fair llate tomorrow. 'em f ho vote. ( EXCLUSIVE ASSOCIATED PRESS LEASED WIRE TELEGRAPH SERVICE VOL. XXXV. NO. 124. LAS VEGAS DAILY OPTICf WEDNESDAY, APRIL &, 1914. City edition He declared the government was do candidates for the upper house of the ad- 'i : '' ing everything in its power , to. council. '.'" DEFENDS CITY FOB .,-'- A JONES vance the interests of the west. OF TAMPICO C0L01IATOBE WEN VOTE SITU RECEIVES . "The secretary of the interior Is a Socialist is toser ; ' western man," he "and 8. With continued, ANTI-SALOO- Milwaukee, Wis., April THE LEASE western He THREATENS TO PAID A LARGE N EVERY VOTE understands conditions. two precincts missing, the unofficial , is exerting Jiimself to bring about the vote for' mayor In yesterday's election substantial development of,, your gives Gerhard Bading, SYSTEM states." FALL CAUSE for mayor, 36,184 i Emil Seldel, so- CAST ivir.
    [Show full text]
  • A Storypath Exploring the Lasting Legacy of Celilo Falls by Shana Brown
    Living in Celilo A Storypath Exploring the Lasting Legacy of Celilo Falls by Shana Brown Office of Native Education Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Washington State Trillium Publishing, Inc. Acknowledgements Contents Shana Brown would like to thank: Carol Craig, Yakama Elder, writer, and historian, for her photos of Celilo as well as her Introduction to Storypath ..................... 2 expertise and her children’s story “I Wish I Had Seen the Falls.” Chucky is really her first grandson (and my cousin!). Episode 1: Creating the Setting ...............22 The Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission for providing information about their organization and granting permission to use articles, including a piece from their Episode 2: Creating the Characters............42 magazine Wana Chinook Tymoo. Episode 3: Building Context ..................54 HistoryLink.org for granting permission to use the article “Dorothea Nordstrand Recalls Old Celilo Falls.” Episode 4: Authorizing the Dam ..............68 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council for granting permission to use an excerpt from the article “Celilo Falls.” Episode 5: Negotiations .....................86 Ritchie Graves, Chief of the NW Region Hydropower Division’s FCRPS Branch, NOAA Fisheries, for providing information on survival rates of salmon through the Episode 6: Broken Promises ................118 dams on the Columbia River system. Episode 7: Inundation .....................142 Sally Thompson, PhD., for granting permission to use her articles. Se-Ah-Dom Edmo, Shoshone-Bannock/Nez Perce/ Yakama, Coordinator of the Classroom-Based Assessment ...............154 Indigenous Ways of Knowing Program at Lewis & Clark College, Columbia River Board Member, and Vice President of the Oregon Indian Education Association, for providing invaluable feedback and guidance as well as copies of the actual notes and letters from the Celilo Falls Community Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific American 177
    August 31, 1912 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 177 Celilo falls. Completed section of canal in foreground. The head of the Celilo canal. The Celilo Canal road stations and river landings awaiting shipment to the Portland market. Great By W. H. Ballou economies in transportation will be effected l'ENING O of the Columbia River to if this great tonnage of wheat can be placed navigation from its mouth to British on board steamers and floated down Columbia is a project that has been taken stream all the way to Portland. This is up energetically and may be realized with­ ideal transportation, effected at the least in a very few years. Steamers now tiring possible cost. At present a portage rail­ freight to Portland from Lewiston, on the road at Celilo transports freight, both up Snake River, one of the Columbia's chief and down the river, past the places in the tributaries, but an impassible barrier is stream impossible of navigation. This ad­ presented at Celilo Falls and the nearby ditional hauling of freight is exvensi\'c rapids, where reshipment of freight is and causes delay. necessary. The canal work is expected to be fill­ The most important work in opening ished not 1ater than 1!)16, and when thi:: the Columbia River to traffic is now going is accomplished the wheat, hay, fruit, awl forward at Celilo, where a canal, on the much of the livestock, which comprise .thc Oregon shore of the Columbia River, 8% chief staple products of the Inland Em­ miles long, with 5 locks, is being built.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parma Herald (Parma, Idaho), 1903-12-05, [P ]
    “a- . j DROP» VAI p*.an. mm HERALD. LOOK TO OBfiOON. WILL RATIFY TRBATV. OaMfal »tjM FMi tech Talk Dw l NEWS OF IDAHO (WORLD'S CANALS DUEL TO DEATH 1 Affect America. Vi«w •! Bnc'aasrs on Tbo Dalles-CcMIo I Canal Right of Way. Oovcromtnt of Panama Taka* Immedi­ Weahinton, I>ec. 2.—Dr, Herren, f¥>. PAUMA Items of General Interest Gathered Washington, Dec. 1.—Engineer offi­ ate Action on Canal. IDAHO. Colombian minister, ha« silenced cer# in Washington are inclined to be­ Department of Commerce and Panama, Nov. 28.- -The junta, com­ Chicago Police and Boy Bandit, all the members of the Reyes party From All Over the State. lieve The Dallei-Celilo canal situati ..ii Labor Issues Statistics. posed of Jose Augustin Aranago, Toms« Engage in Fierce Battle. and the Bolivar con..«,!—loa. 1» very much. «impUfled by the fact that Tb« Aria« and Manuel Espinoza, held a — Fv Colombians arc now bolding COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL DOtNdS there la to be an extra session ol the WEEK'S DOINGS warm con- ENORMOUS SUM OF MONEY USED meeting this morning, all the ministers STEAL ENGINE TO HELP lerenccs, in which they are attempt­ Oregon legislature. These officers say ESCAPE auch a session presents an opportunity of state and councillors being present, ing to And out just what steps should A Brief k.vkw of Improve mo ml«, Qrowtk for an early and a thoroughly satisfact­ •» ‘ko Pml Week fat Brief aad Interest Therein Is Particularly Keen at and unanimously decided to ratify tbs. Captured la an Exhausted Condition fie taken to bring the South American and Development Along All Uno« ory solution of the problem raised by AI.
    [Show full text]