Indirana Leithii Summaries), an of Published Conservationreview 47: 107–108.Research Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indirana Leithii Summaries), an of Published Conservationreview 47: 107–108.Research Reports HTTPS://JOURNALS.KU.EDU/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSREPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 28(1):161–162189 • APR 2021 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS A CarabidFEATURE ARTICLES Beetle Larva (Epomis sp.) Preying . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: on a OnLeith’s the Road to Understanding Leaping the Ecology and Conservation ofFrog the Midwest’s Giant ( SerpentIndirana ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer leithii 190 ) . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 Omkar Yadav, Neha Junghare, Madhavi Sapkal, and Priya Kadam RESEARCH ARTICLES Department of Zoology, Amdar Shashikant Shinde Mahavidyalaya, Medha, Satara, Maharashtra, India ([email protected] [corresponding author], . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central [email protected], Western Texas ....................... Emily [email protected]) Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT arious arthropod taxa, including arachnids, aquatic as the first instar of a beetle in the genus . The frog . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 Epomis Vhemipterans, .beetles,More Than and Mammals ants, ............................................................................................................................... are known predators of appeared healthy and....................................... behaved normally. 223 The frog most likely both juvenile and .adultThe “Dow amphibians Jones Index” of Biodiversity(e.g., McCormick ............................................................................................................................... and encountered the Epomis larva on............ the ground 225 and the position Polis 1982; HinshawHUSBANDRY and Sullivan 1990; Haddad and Bastos of the larva on the frog suggests that the frog was lured by the 1997; Freed and Neitman.. Captive Care 1998; of the CentralJung Nettedet al. Dragon2000; ....................................................................................................... Zuffi 2001; larva, which subsequently Shannon attached Plummer itself 226 to the frog’s throat Toledo 2005; Dehling 2007; Ward-Fear et al. 2009). Carabid (Wizen and Gasith 2011). beetles frequentlyPROFILE feed on live or dead amphibians (Littlejohn . Kraig Adler: A Lifetime Promoting Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234 and Wainer 1978; Ovaska and Smith 1988; Robertson 1989) Literature Cited and carabid beetleCOMMENTARY larvae in the genus Epomis feed entirely Barve, V.V. and C.S. Chaboo. 2011. Duttaphrynus scaber (Ferguson’s Toad). on amphibians and. The use Turtles a unique Have Been luring Watching behaviorMe ........................................................................................................................ to attract Predation by beetles. Herpetological Eric Review Gangloff 42: 23883–84. Brandmayr, P., T. Bonacci, and T.Z. Brandmayr. 2010. Larval morphology of their prey (BarveBOOK and Chaboo REVIEW 2011; Wizen and Gasith 2011; Epomis circumscriptus (Duftschmid 1812) and of first instar E. dejeani, Wizen et al. 2017).. Threatened These larvaeAmphibians have of the mandibles World edited by with S.N. Stuart,two M. Hoffmann,Dejean, J.S. Chanson,1831, (Coleoptera, N.A. Cox, Carabidae, Chlaeniini) with morphofunctional curved hooks that areR. adapted Berridge, P. forRamani, grabbing and B.E. Young amphibian .............................................................................................................. skin remarks. Zootaxa 2388: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2388.1.4. Robert Powell 243 Crossland, M., T. Haramura, and R. Shine. 2016. Fejervarya sakishimensis (Brandmayr et al. 2010). Herein, we report predation by an (Sakishima Rice Frog). Predation by terrestrial beetle larva. Herpetological CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Epomis larva on a Leith’s Leaping Frog (Indirana leithii Summaries), an of Published ConservationReview 47: 107–108.Research Reports ................................. 245 NATURAL HISTORY RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 endemic species foundNEWBRIEFS in only ............................................................................................................................... a few localities in the northern Dehling, D.M. 2007........................................................ Smilisca sordida (Drab Tree Frog). 248 Predation. Herpetological 38: 444. Western Ghats of EDITORIALMaharashtra INFORMATION and Gujarat, ............................................................................................................................... India (Parmar Review ...................... 251 FOCUS ON CONSERVATION: A Project You Can Support ...............................................................................................Freed, P.S. and K. Neitman. 1998. Notes on predation 252 on the endangered Houston 2018). toad, Bufo houstonensis. Texas Journal of Science 40: 454–456. At 2049 h on 23 September 2020, near a forest guest Haddad, C.F.B. and R.P. Bastos. 1997. Predation on the toad Bufo crucifer during house at Lingmala, Mahabaleshwar, Satara, Maharashtra, reproduction (Anura: Bufonidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 18: 295–298. India (17.9233°N, 73.68944°E; WGS 84; elev. 1,263 m Hinshaw, S.H. and B.K. Sullivan. 1990. Predation on Hyla versicolor and Pseudacris Front Cover. Shannon Plummer. cruciferBack Cover. during Michael reproduction. Kern Journal of Herpetology 24: 196–197. asl), we encountered a Leith’s Leaping Frog with a small Totat et velleseque audant mo Jung,Totat R.E., et velleseque W.L. Ward, audant C.O. mo King, and L.A. Weir. 2000. Plethodon cinereus beetle larva attached to its throat estibus(Fig. inveliquo1). Based velique on rerchil features estibus(Eedback inveliquo Salamander). velique rerchil Predation. Herpetological Review 31: 98–99. described by Brandmayr et al. (2010),erspienimus, we identified quos accullabo. the Ilibus larva erspienimus,Littlejohn, M.quos J. accullabo.and J.W. Wainer. Ilibus 1978. Carabid beetle preying on frogs. Victorian aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque fugiatis maionsequat eumque moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia- ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as accullabo. Fig. 1. A Leith’s Leaping Frog (Indirana leithii) with the first instar of an Epomis beetle larva (Carabidae) attached to its throat. Photographs by Omkar Yadav. Copyright is held by the authors. Articles in R&A are made available under a 161 Reptiles & Amphibians ISSN 2332-4961 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license. YADAV ET AL. REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 28(1):161–162 • APR 2021 Naturalist 95: 251–252. Current knowledge and perspectives. Herpetological Review 36: 395–399. McCormick, S. and G.A. Polis. 1982. Invertebrates that prey on vertebrates. Ward-Fear, G., G.P. Brown, M.J. Greenlees, and R. Shine. 2009. Maladaptive Biological Review 57: 29–58. traits in invasive species: in Australia, cane toads are more vulnerable to preda- Ovaska, K. and M.A. Smith. 1988. Predatory behavior of two species of ground beetles tory ants than are native frogs. Functional Ecology 23:559-568. https://doi. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) towards juvenile salamanders (Plethodon vehiculum). org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01556.x. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1139/z88-089. Wizen, G. and A. Gasith. 2011. An unprecedented role reversal: Ground beetle Parmar, D. 2018. A New Locality Record for Leith’s Leaping Frog, Indirana leithii larvae (Coleoptera: Carabidae) lure amphibians and prey upon them. PloS (Boulenger 1888), from Dhulda Village, The Dangs District, Gujarat, India. ONE 6: e25161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025161. Reptiles & Amphibians 25: 57–59. Wizen, G., A. Pardeshi, and K. Bhise. 2017. Pseudophilautus amboli (Amboli Bush Robertson, J.G.M. 1989. Predation by a carabid beetle on Australian frogs. Frog). Predation by terrestrial beetle larvae. Herpetological Review 48: 612. Herpetological Review 20: 7–8. Zuffi, M.A. 2001. Bufo bufo (European Common Toad). Red ant predation. Toledo, L.F. 2005. Predation of juvenile and adult anurans by invertebrates: Herpetological Review 32: 100–101. 162.
Recommended publications
  • 612 Natural History Notes
    612 NATURAL HISTORY NOTES ruber and Rhinella crucifer (Souza-Júnior et al. 1991. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 51:585–588). The specimens of G. chabaudi (males) identi- fied herein possess the diagnostic characters of this species, es- pecially three pairs of genital papillae: one preanal pair, another postanal, laterally projecting and a third ventral pair located in a short, subulated and coiled tail. In this note, the distribution of G. chabaudi is expanded and P. platensis is a new host record. We are grateful to Marissa Fabrezi (Instituto de Biología y Geociencias del NOA-Salta) for identifying the tadpoles. GABRIEL CASTILLO, Universidad Nacional de San Juan Argentina. Di- versidad y Biología de Vertebrados del Árido, Departamento de Biología, San Juan, Argentina (e-mail: [email protected]); GERALDINE RA- MALLO, Instituto de Invertebrados, Fundación Miguel Lillo, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina (e-mail: [email protected]); CHARLES R. BURSEY, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Biology, Shenango Campus, Sharon, Pennsylvania 16146, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); STE- PHEN R. GOLDBERG, Whittier College, Department of Biology, Whittier, California 90608, USA (e-mail: [email protected]); JUAN CARLOS ACOSTA, Universidad Nacional de San Juan Argentina. Diversidad y Bi- ología de Vertebrados del Árido, Departamento de Biología, San Juan, Ar- gentina (e-mail: [email protected]). PSEUDOPHILAUTUS AMBOLI (Amboli Bush Frog). PREDA- TION BY TERRESTRIAL BEETLE LARVAE. Amphibians are im- portant prey for numerous arthropod taxa, including ground beetles (Toledo 2005. Herpetol. Rev. 36:395–399; Bernard and Samolg 2014. Entomol. Fennica 25:157–160). Previous studies have shown that Epomis larvae feed exclusively on amphibians and display a unique luring behavior in order to attract their prey FIG.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptilia: Viperidae) Found in Western Ghats, Goa, India
    JoTT COMMUNICATION 2(11): 1261-1267 Habitat suitability, threats and conservation strategies of Hump-nosed Pit Viper Hypnale hypnale Merrem (Reptilia: Viperidae) found in Western Ghats, Goa, India Nitin S. Sawant 1, Trupti D. Jadhav 2 & S.K. Shyama 3 1 Research Scholar, 3 Reader, Department of Zoology, Goa University, Goa 403206, India 2 H.No. 359-A, St.Inez, Altinho, Panaji, Goa 403001, India Email: 1 [email protected] Date of publication (online): 26 October 2010 Abstract: Recent studies indicate that most species are best conserved in their Date of publication (print): 26 October 2010 natural community, which results in niche conservation. Depletion of any species is an ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print) irreversible change. In the present study the habitat ecology, threats and conservation strategies for the Hump-nosed Pit Viper Hypnale hypnale are suggested. The present Editor: Gernot Vogel study was undertaken in some protected areas (PAs) of Goa and the cashew plantations Manuscript details: adjoining these PAs. H. hypnale prefers cool and moist places; most of the females Ms # o2490 of this species are found to spend the period from post monsoon to late summer in Received 22 June 2010 the cashew plantations adjoining and within the PAs, making them more susceptible to Final received 29 September 2010 anthropogenic threats. We conclude that this pattern of seasonal changes in habitat use Finally accepted 03 October 2010 is mostly a consequence of niche conservation. However, this preference for a particular micro-habitat emphasizes the importance for the conservation of this snake population Citation: Sawant, N.S., T.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Indirana Frogs of the Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 49: 257–286 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 30 November 2012 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2012 Endemic Indirana frogs of the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot Abhilash Nair1,*, Sujith V. Gopalan2, Sanil George2, K. Santhosh Kumar2, Amber G. F. Teacher1,3 & Juha Merilä1 1) Ecological Genetics Research Unit, Department of Biosciences, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland (*corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Chemical Biology, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, PO Thycaud, Poojappura, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 014, Kerala, India 3) current address: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Tremough, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK Received 25 Mar. 2012, final version received 24 July 2012, accepted 21 Sep. 2012 Nair, A., Gopalan, S. V., George, S., Kumar, K. S., Teacher, A. G. F. & Merilä, J. 2012: Endemic Indirana frogs of the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 49: 257–286. Frogs of the genus Indirana belong to the endemic family Ranixalidae and are found exclusively in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot. Since taxonomy, biology and distribution of these frogs are still poorly understood, we conducted a comprehensive literature review of what is known on the taxonomy, morphology, life history characteris- tics and breeding biology of these species. Furthermore, we collected information on the geographical locations mentioned in the literature, and combined this with information from our own field surveys in order to generate detailed distribution maps for each spe- cies. Apart from serving as a useful resource for future research and conservation efforts, this review also highlights the areas where future research efforts should be focussed.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Endemic West African Vertebrate Family – a New Anuran Family Highlighting the Uniqueness of the Upper Guinean Biodiversity Hotspot Barej Et Al
    The first endemic West African vertebrate family – a new anuran family highlighting the uniqueness of the Upper Guinean biodiversity hotspot Barej et al. Barej et al. Frontiers in Zoology 2014, 11:8 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/11/1/8 Barej et al. Frontiers in Zoology 2014, 11:8 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/11/1/8 RESEARCH Open Access The first endemic West African vertebrate family – a new anuran family highlighting the uniqueness of the Upper Guinean biodiversity hotspot Michael F Barej1*, Andreas Schmitz2, Rainer Günther1, Simon P Loader3, Kristin Mahlow1 and Mark-Oliver Rödel1 Abstract Background: Higher-level systematics in amphibians is relatively stable. However, recent phylogenetic studies of African torrent-frogs have uncovered high divergence in these phenotypically and ecologically similar frogs, in particular between West African torrent-frogs versus Central (Petropedetes) and East African (Arthroleptides and Ericabatrachus) lineages. Because of the considerable molecular divergence, and external morphology of the single West African torrent-frog species a new genus was erected (Odontobatrachus). In this study we aim to clarify the systematic position of West African torrent-frogs (Odontobatrachus). We determine the relationships of torrent-frogs using a multi-locus, nuclear and mitochondrial, dataset and include genera of all African and Asian ranoid families. Using micro-tomographic scanning we examine osteology and external morphological features of West African torrent-frogs to compare them with other ranoids. Results: Our analyses reveal Petropedetidae (Arthroleptides, Ericabatrachus, Petropedetes) as the sister taxon of the Pyxicephalidae. The phylogenetic position of Odontobatrachus is clearly outside Petropedetidae, and not closely related to any other ranoid family.
    [Show full text]
  • 78355381012.Pdf
    Revista de Bioética y Derecho ISSN: 1886-5887 Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética Villamor Iglesias, Alejandro The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature Revista de Bioética y Derecho, no. 42, 2018, January-April, pp. 181-195 Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78355381012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature - Alejandro Villamor Iglesias Rev Bio y Der. 2018; 42: 181-195 Revista de Bioética y Derecho Perspectivas Bioéticas www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu - ISSN 1886-5887 BIOÉTICA ANIMAL The overwhelming prevalence of suffering in Nature La abrumadora prevalencia del sufrimiento en la naturaleza L'aclaparant prevalença del patiment a la naturalesa ALEJANDRO VILLAMOR IGLESIAS * OBSERVATORI DE BIOÈTICA I DRET DE LA UNIVERSITAT DE BARCELONA La Revista de Bioética y Derecho se creó en 2004 a iniciativa del Observatorio de Bioética y Derecho (OBD), con el soporte del Máster en Bioética y Derecho de la Universidad de Barcelona: www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu/master. En 2016 la revista Perspectivas Bioéticas del Programa de Bioética de la Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) se ha incorporado a la Revista de Bioética y Derecho. Esta es una revista electrónica de acceso abierto, lo que significa que todo el contenido es de libre acceso sin coste alguno para el usuario o su institución.
    [Show full text]
  • New Distribution Records for the Critically Endangered Frog Indirana Gundia (Dubois, 1986) from Kerala Part of Western Ghats, India
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5825 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e5825 Taxonomic Paper New distribution records for the critically endangered frog Indirana gundia (Dubois, 1986) from Kerala part of Western Ghats, India Abdulrasheed Safia Jesmina‡‡, Sanil George ‡ Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India Corresponding author: Sanil George ([email protected]) Academic editor: Diogo Provete Received: 05 Aug 2015 | Accepted: 10 Aug 2015 | Published: 11 Aug 2015 Citation: Jesmina A, George S (2015) New distribution records for the critically endangered frog Indirana gundia (Dubois, 1986) from Kerala part of Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5825. doi: 10.3897/ BDJ.3.e5825 Abstract Background Indirana gundia is one of the critically endangered frog species of Western Ghats, India, and known only from the type locality (Gundya in Karnataka State, India) at an elevation of 200 m Mean Sea Level. We provide data on the geographical distribution of this species using molecular tools. New information Our results expand the geographical distribution range of this species about 111 km south up to the northern part of Kerala State and recorded at an elevation ranging from 115 m to 200 m asl. © Jesmina A, George S. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Jesmina A, George S Keywords Western Ghats, Distribution, Indirana gundia, 16S ribosomal RNA Introduction The genus Indirana is the only representative of the endemic amphibian family Ranixalidae in the Western Ghats, India with twelve valid species (Modak et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Distribution and Status of the Amphibian Fauna of Sangli District, Maharashtra, India
    Int. J. of Life Sciences, 2017, Vol. 5 (3): 409-419 ISSN: 2320-7817| eISSN: 2320-964X RESEARCH ARTICLE Diversity, Distribution and Status of the Amphibian fauna of Sangli district, Maharashtra, India Sajjan MB1*, Jadhav BV2 and Patil RN1 1Department of Zoology, Sadguru Gadage Maharaj College, Karad - 415124, (M.S.), India 2Department of Zoology, Balasaheb Desai College, Patan - 415206, (M.S.), India *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript details: ABSTRACT Received: 26.07.2017 30 species of amphibians were reported during a survey belonging to 19 Accepted: 20.08.2017 genera of 9 families and 2 orders from Sangli district, Maharashtra, India, Published : 23.09.2017 during June 2013 to May 2017. Out of 30 species recorded, 19 species are endemic to Western Ghats. All of the tehsils in this district except Shirala fall Editor: under semi arid zone having rich amphibian diversity. Shirala tehsil is Dr. Arvind Chavhan flanked by Western Ghats with high rainfall and humidity harbouring Cite this article as: highest number of species, while Atpadi tehsils is a drought prone zone Sajjan MB, Jadhav BV and Patil RN with the lowest number of species. The highest numbers of species are (2017) Diversity, Distribution and reported at 1100m asl and the lowest number of species in the area below Status of the Amphibian fauna of 600m asl. Along with checklist, information about the habitat, rainfall, Sangli district, Maharashtra, India, temperature, distribution and status of amphibians in the district are given. International J.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Adaptive Radiations in Madagascan and Asian Ranid Frogs Reveal Covariation Between Larval and Adult Traits
    Convergent adaptive radiations in Madagascan and Asian ranid frogs reveal covariation between larval and adult traits Franky Bossuyt†‡ and Michel C. Milinkovitch†§ †Unit of Evolutionary Genetics, Free University of Brussels (ULB), cp 300, Institute of Molecular Biology and Medicine, rue Jeener and Brachet 12, B-6041 Gosselies, Belgium; and ‡Biology Department, Unit of Ecology and Systematics, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Edited by John C. Avise, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, and approved March 27, 2000 (received for review December 23, 1999) Recent studies have reported that independent adaptive radiations and torrential or semiterrestrial larvae), Mantellinae (a di- can lead to identical ecomorphs. Our phylogenetic analyses of verse group of arboreal and torrential Madagascan frogs), nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences here indicate that a Rhacophorinae (tree frogs), and Tomopterninae (burrowing major radiation of ranid frogs on Madagascar produced morpho- frogs). logical, physiological, and developmental characters that are re- Given the low dispersal abilities of amphibians over salty markably similar to those that independently evolved on the environments, tectonic movements, as well as sea-level changes, Indian subcontinent. We demonstrate further that, in several cases, might have been of major importance in shaping the distribution adult and larval stages each evolved sets of characters which are of lineages within ranid frogs. After the Madagascar–Seychelles– not only convergent between independent lineages, but also Indian plate drifted from the rest of Gondwana [starting around allowed both developmental stages to invade the same adaptive 130 mya (14)], first Madagascar, then Seychelles disconnected zone. It is likely that such covariations are produced by similar about 88 mya (15) and 65 mya (16), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Anura: Ranidae)
    Hamadryad Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 75 – 82 , 2000 Copyright 2000 Centre for Herpetology, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust MOLECULAR AND KARYOLOGICAL DATA ON THE SOUTH ASIAN RANID GENERA INDIRANA, NYCTIBATRACHUS AND NANNOPHRYS (ANURA: RANIDAE) Miguel Vences1,4, Stefan Wanke1, Gaetano Odierna2, Joachim Kosuch3 and Michael Veith3 1Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. Email: [email protected] 2Dipartimento Biologia Evolutiva e Comparata, Universitá di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Mezzocannone 8, 80134 Napoli, Italy. Email: [email protected] 3Zoologisches Institut der Universität Mainz, Abteilung Ökologie, Saarstrasse 21, D55099 Mainz, Germany. Email: [email protected] 4Present address: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire des Reptiles et Amphibiens, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France. (with four text-figures) ABSTRACT.– Phylogenetic relationships of the endemic south Asian frogs of the genera Indirana, Nyctibatrachus and Nannophrys were studied using DNA sequences (a total of 880 bp) of the mitochondrial 16S and 12S rRNA genes. The topology of the obtained cladograms was largely unresolved, indicating a star-like radiation of the main ranid lineages. No molecular affinities were found between the south Asian taxa and Malagasy ranids. Nannophrys was positioned as sister group of Euphlyctis in all analyses. This grouping, which was supported by moderate to high bootstrap values, indicates that Nannophrys is an offshoot of Asian ranids, and not related to the South African cacosternines. Karyotypes were obtained for Nannophrys ceylonensis (2n = 26), N. marmorata (2n = 26), Indirana sp. (2n = 30) and I. cf. leptodactyla (2n = 24). The 2n = 30 karyotype of Indirana sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetles Fauna of Scrub Forests of Chakwal Division, Punjab
    Ground Beetles Fauna of Scrub Forests of Chakwal Division, Punjab BASELINE ESTABLISHMENT FOR PRERAH, DILJABBA AND ARA RESERVE FORESTS Mishkat Ullah PAKISTAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | GERDEN AVENUE, SHKARPARIAN, ISLAMABAD Table of Contents ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 FIELD COLLECTION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 1: Pitfall trap ................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 2: Ultra Violet Light Trap ................................................................................................................ 6 LABORATORY WORK & DATA PRESENTATION ............................................................................................ 6 Table 1: Sampling sites visited for Carabid collection ............................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Map of sampling sites at Scrub Forest Chakwal ........................................................................ 9 RESULTS & DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................... 10 Table 2: Checklist
    [Show full text]
  • Predation of Amphibians by Carabid Beetles of the Genus Epomis 181 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.100.1526 Research Article
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 100: 181–191 (2011)Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis 181 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.100.1526 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis found in the central coastal plain of Israel Gil Wizen, Avital Gasith Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel Corresponding author: Gil Wizen ([email protected]) Academic editor: Th. Assmann | Received 10 November 2009 | Accepted 10 March 2010 | Published 20 May 2011 Citation: Wizen G, Gasith A (2011) Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis found in the central coastal plain of Israel. In: Kotze DJ, Assmann T, Noordijk J, Turin H, Vermeulen R (Eds) Carabid Beetles as Bioindicators: Biogeographical, Ecological and Environmental Studies. ZooKeys 100: 181–191. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.100.1526 Abstract The genus Epomis is represented in Israel by two species: E. dejeani and E. circumscriptus. In the central coastal plain these species are sympatric but do not occur in the same sites. The objective of this study was to record and describe trophic interactions between the adult beetles and amphibian species occurring in the central coastal plain of Israel. Day and night surveys at three sites, as well as controlled laboratory ex- periments were conducted for studying beetle-amphibian trophic interaction. In the field we recorded three cases of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirana Salelkari, a New Species of Leaping Frog (Anura
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 July 2015 | 7(9): 7493–7509 Indirana salelkari, a new species of leaping frog (Anura: Ranixalidae) from Western Ghats of Goa, India Communication Nikhil Modak 1, Neelesh Dahanukar 2, Ninad Gosavi 3 & Anand D. Padhye 4 ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 1,4 Department of Biodiversity, MES Abasahab Garware College, Karve Road, Pune, Maharashtra 411004, India 2 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), G1 Block, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, OPEN ACCESS Maharashtra 411008, India 2 Systematics, Ecology and Conservation Laboratory, Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), 96 Kumudham Nagar, Vilankurichi Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India 3 Department of Zoology, Willingdon College, Sangli, Maharashtra 416416, India 4 Department of Zoology, MES Abasahab Garware College, Karve Road, Pune, Maharashtra 411004, India 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected], 4 [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: Indirana salelkari, a new species of leaping frog, is described from Netravali, Goa, India. The species can be distinguished from its congeners by a combination of morphological characters, viz., head longer than wide, narrow and deep buccal cavity, vomerine teeth large and acutely placed close to each other, oval choanae, distinct canthus rostralis, first finger longer than or equal to second, presence of double outer palmer tubercles, elongated inner metatarsal tubercle, moderate webbing, discs of fingers and toes with crescentic deep marginal grooves restricted only to the anterior side of the discs, dorsal skin with glandular folds but without warts, ventral skin granular with some mottling on throat and, palms and soles dark brown.
    [Show full text]