DOCSLIB.ORG

Macedon Energy Futures Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macedon Energy Futures Survey Macedon Energy Futures Survey Acknowledgments Report authors: Leigh Ewbank (Yes 2 Renewables coordinator) and Marie Lakey (Yes 2 Renewables) Editor: Ben Courtice Thanks: Cam Walker (Friends of the Earth Australia), Macedon Ranges Sustainability Group, Riddells Creek Sustainability Group and supporters. Yes 2 Renewables is a project of Friends of the Earth (Melbourne). Please support our work with a donation: www.givenow.com.au/foeyes2renewables Introduction In 2011, the Victorian government introduced the world’s toughest wind farm restrictions. Its amendments to the Victoria Planning Provisions effectively banned wind farms in large swathes of the state, thwarting both community-initiated and commercial projects. The Coalition government’s justification for the restrictions on wind farms was to empower communities in the decision-making process and protect areas with high tourism value. On face value these explanations seem reasonable, yet importantly, the government introduced anti-wind farm laws without conducting any community consultation, investigating the views of tourists or economic impact assessment. There is another dimension to policymaking to consider alongside the preferences of community and economy. Worsening climate change science forms the backdrop to the Coalition government’s anti-wind farm policies. Indicators of climatic stability are still heading in the wrong direction. In May 2013, global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide passed the 400 parts per million threshold - the highest level in three million years. Fires, floods, storms and heatwaves exacerbated by climate change have already cost Victoria $19.9 billion dollars over the last decade.i Victoria is among the most polluting states in the developed world. The state’s high greenhouse gas contributions are principally due to the use of heavily polluting brown coal-fired plants to generate electricity. Clean and safe, wind power is the most mature and affordable renewable energy technology. Installing more wind energy capacity is the most cost-effective way to quickly reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels. This approach offers Victoria the most ‘bang-for-its-buck’ when it comes to decarbonising the economy. The Macedon Ranges region was one of the areas hit hardest by the restrictions for wind energy development. The seat of Macedon was cut in half by a blanket ban on wind farms that killed off two commercial projects and a proposed community-owned wind farm near Woodend. The government’s lack of public consultation has forced community members to take action into their own hands. If the government won’t engage with the community about their preferred energy sources and appropriate development, then the community will undertake its own research. Over four months, volunteers surveyed over 600 residents and visitors to the seat of Macedon. Those surveyed were asked to identify their preferred energy sources, as well as their views toward community- owned wind farms and the government’s restrictions on wind energy. The Macedon Energy Futures Survey demonstrates a strong preference for renewable energy among residents and visitors. The survey documents high support for community-owned wind farms and a strong appetite for the Coalition government’s anti-wind farm laws to be repealed. What are the anti-wind farm laws? In 2011, the Baillieu government made four key changes to the Victoria Planning Provisions that have had material impacts on the wind energy sector. The VC82 amendments: • Established an unprecedented right of veto for householders. Proposed wind turbines can be blocked up to 2 kilometres away. Householders are not beholden to the objectives of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. There is no avenue of appeal for proponents. • Created large ‘no-go’ zones for wind farms. These include: The Macedon-McHarg Ranges, the Great Ocean Road, the South Gippsland Coast, the Yarra Ranges, and the Mornington and Ballarine Peninsulas. • Created large exclusion zones of 5kms around 21 Victorian regional towns. • Made it difficult to extend or make changes to approved projects.ii The VC78 amendment: • Made local councils the responsible authority for assessing wind farm projects—transferred from the minister and the Department of Planning. Community wind farms blocked by anti-wind farm laws Community-owned wind farms give locals a stake in their own energy future, and create jobs and income for communities. However, the Coaltion’s anti-wind farm laws effectively killed off all the existing community wind farm projects in Victoria. Community-owned energy delivers significant benefit to regional economies. The Hepburn Wind farm, which operates in the west of the seat of Macedon, procured more than $7 million worth of local content—more than half of which was sourced from regional Victorian towns. The WISE Wind Farm Proposal The Woodend Integrated Sustainable Energy (WISE) is a project of the Macedon Ranges Sustainability Group. The MRSG set out to follow in the footsteps of the successful Hepburn Wind farm by building a community-owned wind farm nearby Woodend in a pine plantation that will soon be harvested. The project would generate enough clean electricity to power 3,300 households. The Macedon Ranges Sustainability Groups proposal was killed off by the arbitrary blanket ban on wind farms in the Macedon Ranges. The proposed community wind farm in Woodend would have created: • 30 construction jobs • 6 on going jobs for the 30-year life of the project • $151,000 worth of flow-on economic benefits to the region • Up to $45,000 worth of community grant funds • $24,000 worth of drought-proof income for wind farm hosts • Enough clean electricity to power all the homes and businesses in Woodend, Macedon, Mt Macedon and Newham. Hepburn Wind: A case study in community wind farms In 2010, Australia’s first community wind farm was built on farmland at Leonards Hill, near Daylesford, started generating clean, renewable electricity. Despite many challenges, the community’s overwhelming support for renewable energy helped the project become a reality. The success story that is Hepburn Wind has inspired other to follow in their footsteps.iii Project overview The Hepburn Community Wind Park Co-operative (Hepburn Wind) comprises two turbines with a combined capacity of 4.1 MW. It generates enough electricity to power 2,300 homes. The local community owns the wind farm through Hepburn Wind. The co-operative manages the wind farm, provides financial returns to its members and funds community projects through a community fund. The co-operative structure allows for wide-scale community involvement. Hepburn Wind’s 2,000 co-operative members contributed $9.8 million to the construction of the wind farm. The Victorian state government has provided grants totaling $1.725 million and the Bendigo Bank a $3.1 million loan. Raising such a large sum has been a significant achievement, particularly for a project that was an Australian first. It shows other communities a new way of funding and developing wind energy resources, through direct investment from small investors and local communities who want to support local renewable energy. Quick Facts • Since 2011 Hepburn Wind have funded 37 local projects with grants totaling $72,000. • The host farmer receives $10,000 per year in drought-proof income. • Hepburn Wind farm produces enough electricity to power 2,300 homes—equal to all the homes in Daylesford and Hepburn. Awards and Recognition • 2010 Innovator of the Year Award • 2011 Clean Energy Future national • 2011 Victorian Premier’s Sustainability advertising campaign Award • 2012 World Wind Energy Award • 2011 Banksia Environmental Award • 2012 UN International Year of Co- • 2011 Australian Sustainability Award operative (Australian flagship project) Methodology Volunteers from Yes 2 Renewables, Macedon Ranges Sustainability Group and Riddells Creek Sustainability Group surveyed residents and visitors to the shire at markets situated in the electorate of Macedon. Surveying was conducted in Lancefield, Woodend, Kyneton, Riddells Creek, and Gisborne. The survey focused on capturing the preferred energy sources of participants, as well as gauging their support for community wind farms, awareness of the government’s restrictions on wind farms, and their views on the restrictions. The survey results where digitised to allow data to be divided into locals and tourists categories to isolate the views of each group. The survey collected 608 responses, 80 of which were visitors to the shire. The survey captured the views from across the electorate. Macedon Energy Futures Survey: Community Views Q1: Please rank the following energy sources in order of preference (1 to 5): Those living in the seat of Macedon significantly prefer renewable energy sources to fossil fuels. Solar (74 per cent) and wind (20 per cent) accounted for 94 per cent of the first ranking. With the addition of hydropower, 97 per cent of respondents selected renewable energy sources as their first preference. The survey found weak support for fossil fuels in Macedon. Brown coal was the least preferred energy source with 87 per cent of local respondents raking it last. Gas power was the second least preferred option with 78 per cent raking is last. When combined, 96 per cent of respondents ranked coal and gas last. Q2: Do you support more renewaBle energy in Victoria? There is a strong among Macedon residents for more renewable energy. An overwhelming majority of people want more renewable energy generation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bioenergy Industrial Development Feasibility Study – Contract No
    Southern Grampians Shire Council: Bioenergy industrial development feasibility study – Contract No. 44-17 Study report by Enecon Pty Ltd Rev 1 – final report Enecon Pty Ltd ABN 34 006 087 494 Suite 5, 651 Canterbury Rd, Surrey Hills Victoria, 3127 Australia Tel: (61 3) 9895 1250 Fax: (61 3) 9895 1299 www.enecon.com.au Southern Grampians Shire Council Bioenergy industrial development Feasibility study report Table of contents 1 Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................5 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................7 2.1 Background to study......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Structure of report ........................................................................................................................7 3 Markets for energy ............................................................................................................................9 3.1 Heat ...............................................................................................................................................9 3.2 Cooling ...........................................................................................................................................9 3.3 Electricity .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Local Power Agency Bill 2021 and Australian Local Power Agency (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021 Submission 50
    Inquiry into the Australian Local Power Agency Bill 2021 and Australian Local Power Agency (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021 Submission 50 The Australian Local Power Agency Bill 2021 Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on the Environment and Energy Alia Armistead Dan Cass July 2021 Inquiry into the Australian Local Power Agency Bill 2021 and Australian Local Power Agency (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2021 Submission 50 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding the Transition to a Clean Energy Economy
    FUNDING THE TRANSITION TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY More than 85% of the total investments needed to meet the climate challenge will likely have to come from private capital…Without government actions, however, private- “ sector investment will not reach the scale required to address climate change effectively. ” An Australian Conservation Foundation report ABOUT ACF The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) is a national, community-based environmental organisation that has been a strong voice for the environment for over 40 years, promoting solutions through research, consultation, education and partnerships. We work with the community, business and government to protect, restore and sustain our environment. As an independent environment focused NGO that does not compete for investment or advisory mandates, ACF believes it can play a constructive role in lifting the profile of climate finance constraints and opportunities, advocating policy and regulatory settings and facilitating cross-sectoral collaboration in order to rapidly catalyse the required transition to a low carbon economy. ACF has undertaken significant work with the finance community to promote responsible investment and a closer alignment of investment mandates with environmental outcomes. For more information see: www.acfonline.org.au AUTHORS Simon O’Connor Julian Chenoweth Economic Adviser General Counsel Y Australian Conservation Foundation Australian Conservation Foundation M Contact at 03 9345 1106 or [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS The authors would like to thank all those in the finance, energy, professional advisory and other sectors who have contributed their insights and knowledge to this report. We would also like to thank the many ACF staff, volunteers and interns who have contributed their time and research skills.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 October 2011 (Extract from Book 14)
    EXTRACT FROM BOOK PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Wednesday, 12 October 2011 (Extract from book 14) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AO, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier and Minister for the Arts................................... The Hon. E. N. Baillieu, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for Bushfire Response, and Minister for Regional and Rural Development.................................................. The Hon. P. J. Ryan, MP Treasurer........................................................ The Hon. K. A. Wells, MP Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business, and Minister for Tourism and Major Events...................................... The Hon. Louise Asher, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Finance........................... The Hon. R. W. Clark, MP Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations, and Minister for Manufacturing, Exports and Trade ............................... The Hon. R. A. G. Dalla-Riva, MLC Minister for Health and Minister for Ageing.......................... The Hon. D. M. Davis, MLC Minister for Sport and Recreation, and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs . The Hon. H. F. Delahunty, MP Minister for Education............................................ The Hon. M. F. Dixon, MP Minister for Planning............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cefc-Expert-Review-2012.Pdf
    CLEAN ENERGY FINANCE CORPORATION EXPERT REVIEW CLEAN ENERGY FINANCE CORPORATION EXPERT REVIEW REPORT TO GOVERNMENT Report to Government March 2012 MARCH 2012 THE CLEAN ENERGY FINANCE CORPORATION REPORT OF THE EXPERT REVIEW PANEL © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN 978-0-642-74795-2 This publication is available for your use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence, with the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the Treasury logo, photographs, images, signatures and where otherwise stated. The full licence terms are available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Use of Treasury material under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence requires you to attribute the work (but not in any way that suggests that the Treasury endorses you or your use of the work). Treasury material used 'as supplied' Provided you have not modified or transformed Treasury material in any way including, for example, by changing the Treasury text; calculating percentage changes; graphing or charting data; or deriving new statistics from published Treasury statistics – then Treasury prefers the following attribution: Source: The Australian Government the Treasury Derivative material If you have modified or transformed Treasury material, or derived new material from those of the Treasury in any way, then Treasury prefers the following attribution: Based on The Australian Government the Treasury data Use of the Coat of Arms The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are set out on the It’s an Honour website (see www.itsanhonour.gov.au) Other Uses Inquiries regarding this licence and any other use of this document are welcome at: Manager Communications The Treasury Langton Crescent Parkes ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] THE EXPERT REVIEW PANEL The Government appointed an Expert Review Panel on 12 October 2011 to advise on the design of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC).
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Renewable Energy Target 2017-18 Progress Report
    Victorian Renewable Energy Target 2017-18 Progress Report Tabled by the Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change, pursuant to Section 8 of the Renewable Energy (Jobs and Investment) Act 2017 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Contents Minister’s foreword ........................................................................................................... 2 1. Background ................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 About this report ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 The Victorian Renewable Energy Target and market development in the renewable energy sector ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Progress towards the VRET targets ............................................................................ 5 2.1 Victoria’s current electricity generation profile ...................................................................................... 5 2.2 Renewable energy development .............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Investment and employment
    [Show full text]
  • Regions and Marginal Loss Factors: FY 2020-21
    Regions and Marginal Loss Factors: FY 2020-21 July 2021 A report for the National Electricity Market Important notice PURPOSE This document has been prepared by AEMO as the ‘Regions Publication’ under clause 2A.1.3 of the National Electricity Rules (Rules), and to inform Registered Participants of the 2020-21 inter-regional loss equations under clause 3.6.1 of the Rules and 2020-21 intra-regional loss factors under clause 3.6.2 of the Rules. This document has effect only for the purposes set out in the Rules. The National Electricity Law (Law) and the Rules prevail over this document to the extent of any inconsistency. DISCLAIMER The calculation of the loss factors presented in this document incorporates information and forecasts from third parties. AEMO has made every reasonable effort to ensure the quality of the information in this publication but cannot guarantee that any information, forecasts and assumptions are accurate, complete or appropriate for your circumstances. Explanatory information in this document does not constitute legal or business advice, and should not be relied on as a substitute for obtaining detailed and specific advice about the Law, the Rules, any other applicable laws, procedures or policies or the future development of the National Electricity Market power system. Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, AEMO and its officers, employees and consultants involved in the preparation of this document: • make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the currency, accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this document; and • are not liable (whether by reason of negligence or otherwise) for any statements or representations in this document, or any omissions from it, or for any use or reliance on the information in it.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Real Cost of Ted Baillieu's Wind Energy
    What is the real cost of Ted Baillieu’s wind energy policy? yes2renewables.org In August 2011 the Baillieu government implemented new planning rules that placed large sections of Victoria off- limits to wind farm developments. These rules (planning law amendment VC82) created large exclusion zones banning wind developments from some of the best wind areas in the state, in the ranges and on the coast. The result is that they will have to re-apply under the new restrictive planning regulations They also include a 2km setback, so that a if they wish to proceed. In this case they may single household can block any proposed be unable to meet the new conditions, in turbines within two kilometres. And particular receiving written approval from designated regional towns have a 5km every resident within 2 kilometres. exclusion zone around them. Between February and August 2013, another 8 Planning Minister Matthew Guy said he did approved wind farms face the expiration of not believe the policy would stop developers their planning approval. These projects total investing in wind energy in Victoria. Premier 458 turbines, and over 1000MW of capacity, Ted Baillieu has also rejected suggestions the and any or all of them may face the same fate as changes would harm the industry. Naroghid and Devon North. However, the facts suggest otherwise. Already we have seen several projects blocked or abandoned, including four potential Since August 2011 this ill- community-owned projects. A number of considered policy has cost others are put at grave risk. Victoria up to: The Clean Energy Council has estimated the laws will eventually drive up to $3.6 billion of w$887 million in lost or stalled investment away from Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure Builds in the Wind Project Pipeline
    ISSUE 122 | FEBRUARY 2021 OFFICIALLY ENDORSED BY THE CLEAN ENERGY COUNCIL Gale Pressure builds force in the wind project pipeline FREE WIND MAP DARWIN LEGEND Place name 88 Under construction 88 Project 88 Operating Capacity (MW) Capacity (MW) completion completion expected expected Year opened, Year Year opened, Year Main owner Main owner Asset Asset WESTERN AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES 5km wind map Mean wind speed at 80m 1 Collgar REST 2011 206 107 Sapphire Partners Group 2018 270 ALL-ENERGY 2020 108 Silverton Powering Australian 2020 200 11 21 32km/h 2 Badgingarra APA Group 2019 130 Renewables 3 Walkaway 1 Infigen Energy 2006 89 109 White Rock Wind Farm Stage 1 CECWPC 2018 175 4 Emu Downs Wind APA Group 2006 80 110 Gullen Range Beijing Jingneng Clean 2014 166 5 Mumbida Infrastructure Capital Group 2013 55 Energy Australia 6 Albany Bright Energy 2001 21 111 Capital Infigen Energy 2009 141 7 Agnew Mine Hybrid EDL 2020 18 112 Crudine Ridge Partners Group 2020 135 Wind Map of 3 6 9m /s 8 Grasmere Bright Energy 2012 14 113 Bodangora Infigen Energy 2019 113 9 Karakin Wind Farm Blair Fox 2013 5 114 Boco Rock EGCO 2014 113 10 West Hills Wind Farm Blair Fox 2012 5 115 Taralga Pacific Hydro 2015 107 11 Nine Mile Synergy 2003 4 116 Crookwell 2 Naturgy 2018 91 12 Port Gregory Advanced Energy Resources 2019 3 117 Woodlawn Infigen Energy 2011 48 13 Mt Barker Mt Barker Power 2011 2 118 Gunning Wind Acciona 2011 47 Australia 2021 14 Ten Mile Lagoon Synergy 1993 2 119 Cullerin Range Energy Developments 2009 30 15 Denmark Community Denmark Community 2010 2 120 Blayney Tilt Renewables 2001 10 The Wind Map of Australia 2021 shows approximate locations of major wind projects that are operating, under construction or in the planning 16 Kalbarri Synergy 2008 2 121 Crookwell Tilt Renewables 1998 5 process as of December 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind's Growing Role in Regional Australia
    BUILDING STRONGER COMMUNITIES Wind’s Growing Role in Regional Australia 1 This report has been compiled from research and interviews in respect of select wind farm projects in Australia. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Estimates where given are based on evidence available procured through research and interviews.To the best of our knowledge, the information contained herein is accurate and reliable as of the date PHOTO (COVER): of publication; however, we do not assume any liability whatsoever for Pouring a concrete turbine the accuracy and completeness of the above information. footing. © Sapphire Wind Farm. This report does not purport to give nor contain any advice, including PHOTO (ABOVE): Local farmers discuss wind legal or financial advice and is not a substitute for advice, and no person farm projects in NSW Southern may rely on this report without the express consent of the author. Tablelands. © AWA. 2 BUILDING STRONGER COMMUNITIES Wind’s Growing Role in Regional Australia CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Wind Delivers New Benefits for Regional Australia 4 Sharing Community Benefits 6 Community Enhancement Funds 8 Addressing Community Needs Through Community Enhancement Funds 11 Additional Benefits Beyond Community Enhancement Funds 15 Community Initiated Wind Farms 16 Community Co-ownership and Co-investment Models 19 Payments to Host Landholders 20 Payments to Neighbours 23 Doing Business 24 Local Jobs and Investment 25 Contributions to Councils 26 Appendix A – Community Enhancement Funds 29 Appendix B – Methodology 31
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Leading Co-Operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2016
    Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation 1 Australia’s Leading Co-operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2016 Australia’s Leading Co-operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2016 Paper prepared by the UWA Co-operative Enterprise Research Unit C o ns u l ti n g R e se a r ch CEMI Discussion Paper 1601 T r a i n i ng Tim Mazzarol S u pp o r t s a le s Elena Mamouni Limnios s t a f f in g Geoffrey N. Soutar s u pp o r t Johannes Kresling Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation | www.cemi.com.au Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation 2 Australia’s Leading Co-operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2016 Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation Phone: +618 6488-3981 Fax: +618 6488-1072 Email: [email protected] General Inquiries: Email: [email protected] Website: www.cemi.com.au CEMI Discussion Paper Series ISSN 1448-2541 Discussion Paper 1601 © Copyright Tim Mazzarol, Elena Mamouni Limnios, Geoffrey N. Soutar & Johannes Kresling 2016 Discussion Papers should not be reproduced without attribution to the author(s) as the source of the material. Attribution for this paper should be: Mazzarol, T., Mamouni Limnios, E., Soutar, G.N., & Kresling, J. (2016) “Australia’s Leading Co-operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2015” CEMI Discussion Paper Series, DP 1601, Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation, www.cemi.com.au NOTE: This paper has been prepared in conjunction with the UWA Co-operative Enterprise Research Unit (CERU) http://www.business.uwa.edu.au/research/co-operative-enterprise-research-unit for the Business Council of Co-operatives and Mutuals (BCCM) http://bccm.coop Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation | www.cemi.com.au Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation 3 Australia’s Leading Co-operative and Mutual Enterprises in 2016 CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Options for Delivering Ownership and Benefit Sharing Models for Wind Farms in NSW
    Strategic options for delivering ownership and benefit sharing models for wind farms in NSW September 2014 Version 2.0 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by Ernst & Young in good faith exercising all due care and attention, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the relevance, accuracy, completeness or fitness for purpose of this document in respect of any particular user’s circumstances. Users of this document should satisfy themselves concerning its application to, and where necessary seek expert advice in respect of, their situation. The views expressed within are not necessarily the views of the Office of Environment and Heritage and may not represent OEH policy. © Copyright State of NSW and the Office of Environment and Heritage This report was prepared at the request the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (hereafter “the Client”) solely for the purposes of reporting the findings of Shared Benefit Mechanisms and it is not appropriate for use for other purposes. The Client and any other party other than the Client who access this report shall only do so for their general information only and this report should not be taken as providing specific advice to those parties on any issue, nor may this report be relied upon in any way by any party other than the Clients. A party other than the Clients accessing this report should exercise its own skill and care with respect to use of this report, and obtain independent advice on any specific issues concerning it. In carrying out our work and preparing this report, Ernst & Young has worked solely on the instructions of the Client, and has not taken into account the interests of any party other than the Clients.
    [Show full text]