Major Barbara STUDY GUIDE RESPONSE SHEET

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Major Barbara STUDY GUIDE RESPONSE SHEET STUDY GUIDE 2005 CONTAINS ONTARIO CURRICULUM SUPPORT MATERIAL MAJOR BARBARA BY BERNARD SHAW Education Partner PRESENTS Major Barbara By Bernard Shaw This study guide for Major Barbara contains back- ground information for the play, suggested themes TABLE OF CONTENTS and topics for discussion, and curriculum-based lessons that are designed by educators and theatre professionals. The Players .............................................................3 The lessons and themes for discussion are organ- The Story ................................................................4 ized in modules that can be used independently or interdependently according to your class’s level and The Playwright .......................................................5 time availability. Director’s Notes ....................................................6 THIS GUIDE WAS WRITTEN AND COMPILED BY Production History................................................7 BARBARA WORTHY, DEBRA MCLAUCHLAN, AND DENIS JOHNSTON. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS Background: The Salvation Army .......................8 WERE PROVIDED BY JOSEPH ZIEGLER. Background: The Uniform ..................................9 COVER: DIANA DONNELLY AND BENEDICT CAMPBELL PHOTO BY SHIN SUGINO Background: Poverty in London ...................... 10 Classroom Application MAJOR BARBARA Before Attending the Play ............................11-17 Running time: 3 hrs 20 mins approx. After Attending the Play……………… 18-24 including two intermissions Glossary of Theatre Terms………………….25 Previews June 10 Response Sheet……………………………...26 Opens June 24 Closes October 29 For a calendar of performances visit: www.shawfest.com 2 The Players Lady Britomart Undershaft..................................................................Mary Haney Stephen Undershaft........................................................................ David Leyshon Morrison/Bilton..............................................................................Micheal Querin Barbara Undershaft........................................................................ Diana Donnelly Sarah Undershaft..........................................................................Charlotte Gowdy Charles Lomax.................................................................................... Evan Buliung Adolphus Cusins...................................................................................Ben Carlson Andrew Undershaft ..................................................................Benedict Campbell Rummy Mitchens...................................................................................Sharry Flett Snobby Price................................................................................... Andrew Bunker Jenny Hill ........................................................................................ Jenny L. Wright Peter Shirley............................................................................................. Jay Turvey Bill Walker....................................................................................... Patrick Galligan Mrs. Baines ....................................................................................... Patty Jamieson Army Members...................... Cathy Current, Evert Houston, Chilina Kennedy Directed by Joseph Ziegler Designed by Christina Poddubiuk Lighting Designed by Kevin Lamotte Musical Direction and Original Music by Allen Cole Stage Manager: Allan Teichman Assistant Stage Manager: Beatrice Campbell Technical Director: Jeff Scollon Production Stage Manager: Judy Farthing Costume Sketches of Adolphus Cusins and Barbara Undershaft by Christina Poddubiuk 3 The Story Bernard Shaw's Major Barbara has been called the the challenge. However, Undershaft believes that most controversial of Shaw's works, while also be- two things are necessary to salvation: money and ing recognized as a major work in the history of gunpowder. Love, truth, and mercy are the graces modern drama. of a "rich, strong, and safe life." And so Under- shaft plans to demonstrate his power over the As the play begins it is an evening in January 1906, Army in his effort to win Barbara over to his cause. in the library of Lady Britomart Undershaft. When her son Stephen enters, Britomart announces that Many of his plays are known for their involved ar- as a grown man, Stephen must now take charge of guments and Major Barbara is no exception. Shaw the family affairs, as neither of his two sisters are himself called the play "a discussion in three long capable, or in a position to do so. Sarah has be- acts," and much of the play's action consists, in come engaged, but cannot guarantee any money fact, of words. When the play was published in for years, and Barbara, the most promising mem- 1907 Shaw added, as with many of his works, a ber of the household, has joined the Salvation lengthy preface, contributing further discussion Army and taken up with a tempestuous Greek about the play itself. scholar, Adolphus Cusins.. Lady Britomart cannot In addition, the play is noted for its unconven- avoid the topic any longer— she must speak of tional attitudes toward morality as well as its irony the children’s father, the great military industrialist and humour. Issues of wealth and poverty, busi- Andrew Undershaft. ness and religion, cynicism and idealism are seri- Some time ago, perhaps 20 years, Undershaft and ously examined within the play, but it is sometimes his wife had separated. The cause of this was that easy to overlook the fact that Major Barbara is also a he made it clear that he would never pass on the comedy, albeit a very practical one. Shaw uses the business to his (then-infant) son, Stephen. The rea- play to entertain his audience, to make people son was the Undershaft family tradition: through laugh, while focusing on issues that are as impor- generations of armourers and now artillery manu- tant today as they were when the play was first facturers, the business had always been deeded to written. a “foundling” - that is, an orphan, one who was Shaw's seeming criticism of Christianity caused perhaps abandoned (“found”), and likely born out some to accuse him of blasphemy, while others of wedlock. To Lady Britomart, legitimacy was up- defended what they saw as Shaw's realistic presen- permost, and so was “primogeniture”, the system tation of religion. Critics complained about the vio- of passing on an estate to the eldest son. And so lence of the play, particularly in the second act, say- they separated. But now she is in financial need, ing it was so excessive as to be beyond realism. and so she has invited Andrew to visit with the in- Others disagreed, saying the depiction of violence tention of asking him for a substantial contribu- was perhaps unrealistic only in the fact that it was tion. The family is summoned to the library and subdued. informed of her plans. Barbara is amused and ex- pectant; she decides that her father, after all, has a Despite the opinions of critics the play was an soul to be saved like everyone else, and, as a Major overwhelming success with the public, and remains in the Salvation Army, she determines to take up so today. 4 The Playwright: George Bernard Shaw 1856 -1950 George Bernard Shaw, born in Dublin in 1856, drama critic and to make his living solely as a play- began his writing career as a novelist and journalist, wright. but gained his great fame as a playwright. Most In 1898 he married Charlotte Payne-Townshend, people consider Shaw the second-greatest play- an Irish heiress whom he had met through his Fa- wright in the English language, after only Shake- bian friends Beatrice and Sidney Webb. speare. Although Shaw’s plays were not popular initially, in Growing up in Dublin, Shaw developed a wide the period 1904-07 he began to reach a larger audi- knowledge of music, art and ence through an influential series literature under the influence of of productions at London’s Royal his mother, a singer and vocal Court Theatre. His plays became music teacher. At age 20 he known for their brilliant argu- moved to London, where he ments, their wit, and their unre- spent his afternoons in the Brit- lenting challenges to the conven- ish Museum and his evenings tional morality of his time. Among pursuing his informal education his plays presented there were the by attending lectures and de- premieres of John Bull’s Other Island bates. He declared himself a (1904), Man and Superman (1905), socialist in 1882 and joined the Major Barbara (1905) and The Doc- new “Fabian Society” in 1884. tor’s Dilemma (1906). His best- Soon he distinguished himself known play, Pygmalion, was first as an effective public speaker, performed in 1913. Two genera- and an incisive and irreverent tions later, it attained even greater critic of music, art and drama. fame as the musical My Fair Lady. Shaw’s first play, Widowers’ During World War I, Shaw’s anti- Houses, was produced at a pri- Bernard Shaw: 1905 war speeches and a controversial vate theatre club in 1892. It was followed by The pamphlet entitled Common Sense About the War Philanderer and Mrs Warren’s Profession. These three made him very unpopular as a public figure. In plays were published as Plays Unpleasant (1898). Heartbreak House (performed 1920) Shaw exposed, More palatable, though still rich with challenges to in a country-house setting, the spiritual bankruptcy conventional middle-class values, were his Plays of the generation responsible for the carnage. Next Pleasant published the same year: this volume in- came Back to Methuselah (1922)
Recommended publications
  • A Chronology of Works by and About Bernard Shaw
    A Chronology of Works By and About Bernard Shaw CONTENTS A. Shaw’s Novels, Plays and Commentary 2 B. Shaw’s Reviews and Criticism 5 C. Shaw’s Collected Writings and Letters 5 D. Biographies and Biographical Studies 8 E. Books and Essay Collections 9 F. Reference Books 15 G. Scholarly Editions of Shaw’s Plays 15 H. Bibliographies 16 I. Miscellanea 17 2 A. Shaw’s Novels, Plays and Commentary First date: year(s) written Second date: year of first performance Third date(s): year(s) of publication [in brackets] 1878 My Dear Dorothea: A Practical System of Moral Education for Females Embodied in a Letter to a Young Person of that Sex (ed. S. Winsten) [1906; 1956] 1878 Passion Play (fragment) [1971] 1879 Immaturity (novel) [1930] 1880 The Irrational Knot (novel) [ser. 1885-7; 1905] 1881 Love Among the Artists (novel) [ser. 1887-8; 1900] 1882 Cashel Byron’s Profession (novel) [ser. 1885-6; 1886; rev 1889, 1901] 1883 An Unsocial Socialist (novel) [ser. 1884; 1887] 1884 Un Petit Drame (playlet) [1959] 1884/92 Widowers’ Houses 1893 [1893; rev. 1898] 1887-88 An Unfinished Novel (novel fragment) [1958] 1889 Fabian Essays in Socialism (ed. Shaw) [1889; rev. 1908, 1931, 1948] 1890 Ibsen Lecture before the Fabian Society [1970] 1891 The Quintessence of Ibsenism (criticism) [1891; rev. 1913] 1893 The Philanderer 1905 [1898] 1893 Mrs Warren’s Profession 1902 [1898; rev. 1930] 1893-94 Arms and The Man 1894 [1898; rev. 1930] 1894 Candida 1897 [1898; rev. 1930] 1895 The Man of Destiny 1897 [1898; rev. 1930] 1895 The Sanity of Art (art criticism) [1895; rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Misalliance the Articles in This Study Guide Are Not Meant to Mirror Or Interpret Any Productions at the Utah Shakespeare Festival
    Insights A Study Guide to the Utah Shakespeare Festival Misalliance The articles in this study guide are not meant to mirror or interpret any productions at the Utah Shakespeare Festival. They are meant, instead, to be an educational jumping-off point to understanding and enjoying the plays (in any production at any theatre) a bit more thoroughly. Therefore the stories of the plays and the interpretative articles (and even characters, at times) may differ dramatically from what is ultimately produced on the Festival’s stages. Insights is published by the Utah Shakespeare Festival, 351 West Center Street; Cedar City, UT 84720. Bruce C. Lee, communications director and editor; Phil Hermansen, art director. Copyright © 2011, Utah Shakespeare Festival. Please feel free to download and print Insights, as long as you do not remove any identifying mark of the Utah Shakespeare Festival. For more information about Festival education programs: Utah Shakespeare Festival 351 West Center Street Cedar City, Utah 84720 435-586-7880 www.bard.org. Cover photo: William Leach (left) and Jody Barrett in Misalliance, 1991. Contents Information on the Play Synopsis 4 CharactersMisalliance 5 About the Playwrights 6 Scholarly Articles on the Play Misalliance and Shaw: Extraordinary 8 A “Discussion” Play 9 The Entertaining Gospel 12 Utah Shakespeare Festival 3 351 West Center Street • Cedar City, Utah 84720 • 435-586-7880 Synopsis: Misalliance In the garden pavilion of his father’s house, Johnny Tarleton is lounging comfortably, when his sister Hypatia’s fiance, Bentley Summerhays, arrives with an offensive air of superiority. Threatened with a beating, Bentley throws himself on the floor and screams, bringing Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • MISALLIANCE : Know-The-Show Guide
    The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey MISALLIANCE: Know-the-Show Guide Misalliance by George Bernard Shaw Know-the-Show Audience Guide researched and written by the Education Department of The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey Artwork: Scott McKowen The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey MISALLIANCE: Know-the-Show Guide In This Guide – MISALLIANCE: From the Director ............................................................................................. 2 – About George Bernard Shaw ..................................................................................................... 3 – MISALLIANCE: A Short Synopsis ............................................................................................... 4 – What is a Shavian Play? ............................................................................................................ 5 – Who’s Who in MISALLIANCE? .................................................................................................. 6 – Shaw on — .............................................................................................................................. 7 – Commentary and Criticism ....................................................................................................... 8 – In This Production .................................................................................................................... 9 – Explore Online ...................................................................................................................... 10 – Shaw: Selected
    [Show full text]
  • How Ovid's “Pygmalion”
    The Complex Relationship of Ars and Natura: How Ovid’s “Pygmalion” Employs the Power of the Artist Kelsey Littlefield ‘17 ublius Ovidius Naso, commonly known as Ovid, was a Roman poet and author who lived during the reign of P Augustus Caesar. He is renowned as poet of great variety and skill, and no work so wonderfully displays his talent as his Metamorphoses, a massive volume of mythological stories of transformation. Throughout the Metamorphoses, art and nature serve as unifying themes and are present in some capacity in each myth Ovid recounts. In particular, art and nature are prevalent in the myth of Pygmalion, a sculptor who falls in love with his ivory creation. An important contrast develops between art and nature in this story, and that contrast speaks to how the senses are woven into both. Roman literature is fond of treating the subjects of art and nature, and their contrasting figures appear again and again in the best works of the Ancient World. These two didactic terms are often used in elegiac poetry as a means of deciphering the interwoven relationships among the poet, lover, and girl (poeta, amator, and puella).1 The poet and the lover are one in the same, as the poet attempts to express the love and the experience of the beloved (i.e., the puella) to his reader. There is also, however, a sense of lament, as in all elegiac poetry, as the beloved has an unattainable quality that eventually leaves the poet/lover in despair. The girl, more specifically Pygmalion’s own beloved,2 exemplifies the erotic nature displayed in Ovid’s version of elegiac poetry and the grappling of the role that the artist plays in shaping his own art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hell Scene and Theatricality in Man and Superman
    233 The Amphitheatre and Ann’s Theatre: The Hell Scene and Theatricality in Man and Superman Yumiko Isobe Synopsis: Although George Bernard Shaw’s Man and Superman (1903) is one of his most important dramatic works, it has seldom been staged. This is because, in terms of content and direction, there are technical issues that make it difficult to stage. In particular, Act Three features a dream in Hell, where four dead characters hold a lengthy philosophical symposium, has been considered independent of the main plot of John Tanner and Ann Whitefield. Tanner’s dream emphatically asserts its theatricality by the scenery, the amphitheatre in the Spanish desert where Tanner dozes off. The scene’s geography, which has not received adequate attention, indicates the significance of the dream as a theatre for the protagonist’s destiny with Ann. At the same time, it suggests that the whole plot stands out as a play by Ann, to which Tanner is a “subject.” The comedy thus succeeds in expressing the playwright’s philosophy of the Superman through the play-within-a- play and metatheatre. Introduction Hell in the third act of Man and Superman: A Comedy and a Philosophy (1903) by George Bernard Shaw turns into a philosophical symposium, as the subtitle of the play suggests, and this intermediate part is responsible for the difficulties associated with the staging of the play. The scene, called “the Hell scene” or “Don Juan in Hell,” has been cut out of performances of the whole play, and even performed separately; however, the interlude by itself has attracted considerable attention, not only from stage managers and actors, but also from critics, provoking a range of multi-layered examinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shavian Shakespeare: Shaw's Use and Transformation of Shakespearean Materials in His Dramas
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1971 Shavian Shakespeare: Shaw's Use and Transformation of Shakespearean Materials in His Dramas. Lise Brandt Pedersen Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Pedersen, Lise Brandt, "Shavian Shakespeare: Shaw's Use and Transformation of Shakespearean Materials in His Dramas." (1971). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2159. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2159 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I I 72- 17,797 PEDERSEN, Lise Brandt, 1926- SHAVIAN .SHAKESPEARE:' SHAW'S USE AND TRANSFORMATION OF SHAKESPEAREAN MATERIALS IN HIS DRAMAS. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1971 Language and Literature, modern University Microfilms, XEROXA Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan tT,TITn ^TnoT.r.a.A'TTAItf U4C PPPM MT PROPTT.MF'n FVAOTT.V AR RECEI VE D SHAVIAN SHAKESPEARE: SHAW'S USE AND TRANSFORMATION OF SHAKESPEAREAN MATERIALS IN HIS DRAMAS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Lise Brandt Pedersen B.A., Tulane University, 1952 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1963 December, 1971 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Shaw: Profiling His Own ‘New Women’ in ‘Plays
    © April 2021| IJIRT | Volume 7 Issue 11 | ISSN: 2349-6002 Bernard Shaw: Profiling his own ‘New Women’ in ‘Plays Pleasant’ and ‘Plays Unpleasant’ Shakuntala Mukherjee Department of English Literature, AMITY University Kolkata, Hooghly, India Abstract - Shaw was successful to shake men’s beliefs to lecture on Ibsen. Shaw was already familiar with the the foundation in all branches of life- be it science, Norwegian dramatist, having seen the London philosophy, economics, theology, drama, music, art, performance of ‘A Doll’s House’. The lecture became novel, politics, criticism, health, education, and what not. ‘The Quintessence of Ibsenism’. Shaw’s brilliant and George Bernard Shaw, who was regarded as a writer promising answers formed the contents of the without a moral purpose at the beginning of his career in literary circles, is today looked upon as a profound Saturday Review. It turned ‘Shaw’s attention to the thinker who saw the truth and revealed it through art. drama as a means of expression on the ideas crowding The brilliance of his dramatic technique and philosophy his mind’. His plays were the truth of life. Shaw’s aim is aptly illuminated by his unconventional art and as a dramatist was to understand everything around dramatic technique. him and through his plays he tried to convey what he Shaw through his drama brought things like realism and understood. He made efforts to enable the public to idealism, individualism and socialism, together. The understand his vision. Regarding this aspect of Shaw; ‘New Woman’ introduced by Shaw; was treated with Purdom writes: contempt or fear as it discussed on the age-old ‘He wrote plays to delight his audiences and to change assumptions on how a man or woman should be.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygmalion Study Guide April 16
    STUDY GUIDE 2004 CONTAINS ONTARIO CURRICULUM SUPPORT MATERIAL PYGMALION by Bernard Shaw Education Partner PRESENTS Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw This study guide for Pygmalion contains background informa- tion for the play, suggested themes and topics for discussion, and curriculum-based lessons that are designed by educators and theatre professionals. TABLE OF CONTENTS The lessons and themes for discussion are organized in mod- ules that can be used independently or interdependently ac- cording to your class’s level and time availability. The Players ..............................................................................3 The general information is on white paper and the lessons are on green. Running Time .........................................................................3 The Author..............................................................................4 THIS GUIDE WAS WRITTEN AND COMPILED BY DENIS The Characters ........................................................................5 JOHNSTON, DEBRA MCLAUCHLAN, AND JOHN SWEENEY. The Story .............................................................................6-7 ADDITIONAL MATERIALS WERE PROVIDED BY BARBARA WORTHY, JACKIE MAXWELL, AND SUE LEPAGE West End Gossip Sheet.........................................................8 Director’s Notes .....................................................................9 Classroom Application Before Attending the Play .............................................10-17 Pygmalion After Attending the Play................................................18-24
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Life Force in Shaw‟S „Widower's House‟ and „Man and Superman' Niraja Saraswat ABSTRACT Literature Can Be
    Lapis Lazuli -An International Literary Journal (LLILJ) Vol.3/ NO.1/Spring 2013 Women and Life Force in Shaw‟s „Widower’s House‟ and „Man and Superman’ Niraja Saraswat ABSTRACT Literature can be seen as a barometer of the time, it holds the views and opinions dear to each author. George Bernard Shaw was a writer who did not care what waves he made because he wanted that turbulence. In his classic work „Man and Superman‟ Shaw used character interactions to voice his objections to common institutions. There is more to this play than a love story and a son‟s struggle for his father‟s approval. The present paper discusses the women in his two plays viz. Ann in „Man and Superman‟ and Blanche in „Widower‟s House‟ who pursue their heartthrobs to ensure the continuance of the race and its improvement through evolution. Since centuries, women have been looked down upon as the 'Object' and men the „Subject‟; selecting women for marriage and love without any conscious approach of knowing women's wish and will. Shaw has turned the table by giving his women characters an open platform to put their own choice of their mates. Romance in the plays of Thomas Robertson, Lapis Lazuli -An International Literary Journal (LLILJ) ISSN 2249-4529, Vol.3/ NO.1/Spring2013 URL of the Issue: http://pintersociety.com/vol-3-no-1spring-2013/ URL of the article: http://pintersociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Niraja-Saraswat-11.pdf © www.pintersociety.com 1 Women and Life Force in Shaw‟s „Widower’s House‟ and „Man and Superman’ Arnold Bennett, Edward Knoblock, Edward Bulwer Lytton and James Sheridan Knowles etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Influence of Satire Introduction
    DeMattio 1 Under the Influence of Satire By: Ashley DeMattio Introduction This thesis compares and contrasts the two plays, Lysistrata by Aristophanes and Mrs. Warren’s Profession by George Bernard Shaw, based on their political agendas through the literary form of satire; they are greatly influenced by the time period in which they lived, and express themselves through the female characters in their plays. Insight and further understanding of each play will be provided, and it will be demonstrated how the authors had a goal of starting specific conversations amongst their audiences. Though these conversations differ, Aristophanes and Shaw demonstrate the ability to politically and intellectually enlighten their audiences through pleasure. Aristophanes was a native of Greece during the first century B.C.E., and witnessed the cruel occurrences of the Peloponnesian War and the challenge to Greece’s political stability. In his play Lysistrata he took the idea of war and molded it into a battle of the sexes. The main idea of the play is that the women of Greece, both Athenians and Spartans, are seeking to end the war, and in order to do so they hold a sex strike. The sex strike is used as a way to intrigue the audience through humor and risqué references; the use of satire is amplified when he uses women as the dominant characters. The women hold the power in the play, and this makes the Athenian audience uneasy. This uneasiness is what Aristophanes wants to accomplish, and he puts the audience in a vulnerable state. Lysistrata is meant to warn the people of Greece; what he is warning against and how he goes about it will be further understood when the play is examined.
    [Show full text]
  • 2395-1885 ISSN -2395-1877 Research Paper Impact Factor
    IJMDRR Research Paper E- ISSN –2395-1885 Impact Factor - 2.262 Peer Reviewed Journal ISSN -2395-1877 THE UNCONVENTIONAL WOMEN IN THE PLAYS OF GEORGE BERNARD SHAW S.Jeyalakshmi Assistant Professor of English, PG Department of English (UA),Kongunadu Arts & Science College, Coimbatore . George Bernard Shaw was a committed socialist, a successful, controversial dramatist, an inspired theatre director of his own work and an influential commentator on contemporary music, drama and fine art. In all his endeavors he demonstrated an indefatigable zeal to reform existing social conditions, sterile theatrical conventions and outworn artistic orthodoxies. Shaw’s opinions on art and artists are scattered throughout his works, in his critical and journalistic writing, in letters and notebooks, as well as in his plays and the prefaces to them. He wrote essays of very high quality which are still read and praised. More than half a century after they were first printed. Shaw had moved to London because he felt that London was the literary centre of the English language. He occupied a central position from the opening of the modern period to his last play in 1950. Shaw dominates the theatre from 1890 right through to the Second World War. In play after play, in preface after preface, he has presented his analysis of the evils and errors of the time and has indicated his own solutions. He has constantly infused into his ideas. The stage-platform has given him the opportunity of shattering numerous false idols and also of awakening minds to thoughts beyond the superficial conventions. Feminist ideas spread among the educated female middle classes and the women's suffrage movements gained momentum of the Victorian Era.
    [Show full text]
  • Heartbreak House
    Heartbreak House George Bernard Shaw Heartbreak House Table of Contents Heartbreak House.....................................................................................................................................................1 George Bernard Shaw....................................................................................................................................1 HEARTBREAK HOUSE: A FANTASIA IN THE RUSSIAN MANNER ON ENGLISH THEMES........1 HEARTBREAK HOUSE AND HORSEBACK HALL................................................................................1 HEARTBREAK HOUSE..........................................................................................................................................18 ACT I...........................................................................................................................................................18 ACT II.......................................................................................................................................................................46 ACT III......................................................................................................................................................................77 i Heartbreak House George Bernard Shaw This page copyright © 2001 Blackmask Online. http://www.blackmask.com • HEARTBREAK HOUSE AND HORSEBACK HALL • HEARTBREAK HOUSE • ACT I • ACT II • ACT III This Etext was produced by Eve Sobol, South Bend, Indiana, USA HEARTBREAK HOUSE: A FANTASIA IN THE RUSSIAN MANNER
    [Show full text]