DOCSLIB.ORG

Rio Salado Oeste Final Environmental Impact Statement Salt River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rio Salado Oeste Final Environmental Impact Statement Salt River Los Angeles District South Pacific Division Rio Salado Oeste Final Environmental Impact Statement Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Arizona Nevada Area Office 3636 North Central Avenue, Suite 740 Phoenix, AZ 85012-1936 September 2006 Proposed Action: Ecosystem restoration along an eight mile reach of the Salt River Type of Statement: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Lead Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Cooperating Agency: City of Phoenix For Further Information: Scott K. Estergard U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District Arizona-Nevada Area Office, Planning Section C 3636 N. Central Ave., Suite 900, Phoenix, AZ. 85012-1939 (602)640-2003, X-242, [email protected] Abstract: This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Rio Salado Oeste project on the Salt River in Maricopa County, Arizona. The primary purpose of the proposed action is ecosystem restoration. The responsible federal lead agency is the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. The City of Phoenix is the non-federal sponsor. The study area for the project consists of an eight mile reach of the Salt River and adjacent lands in and near southwestern Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona. More specifically, the study area consists of the Salt River corridor from 19th Avenue downstream (west) to 83rd Avenue, between Lower Buckeye Road and Baseline Road. This study area is three miles wide and encompasses approximately 23.5 square miles. This document addresses the No-Action Alternative, the Recommended Plan, and four additional alternative plans developed to restore and improve native vegetation and wildlife habitat values in the project area. The recommended plan would entail earth moving, planting of vegetation and irrigation installation to facilitate restoration of 1,466 acres of riparian habitats along the Salt River. Restored habitats would consist of 170 acres of river channel (including 34 acres of in-channel wetland), 375 acres of cottonwood/willow forest, 417 acres of mesquite, 156 acres of other wetlands, 296 acres of riparian scrub and 52 acres of scrub shrub. Additional benefits would include recreational opportunities, general improvements in aesthetic quality, and a slight reduction in the potential for flood damage. Each alternative has been designed to minimize adverse impacts to the maximum extent practicable. The anticipated cumulative effects of implementation of the proposed action have been considered and addressed. Analyses and documentation are consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable laws, regulations, and policies, and have been conducted in coordination with the City of Phoenix, the Gila River Indian Community, concerned resource agencies, and members of the public. Information referred to in this document, as well as in the accompanying feasibility report and appendices, is incorporated by reference. A 45-day comment period on the Rio Salado Oeste, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) began with the publication of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on May 12, 2006. A public hearing to discuss and receive comments on the Draft EIS was held at the Travis L Williams Family Services Community Center in Phoenix, Arizona on the evening of May 18, 2006. All comments received during the comment period were considered in the preparation of the Final EIS. Comments received during the public hearing or in writing, along with responses, may be found in Appendix E of the Final EIS. Unless otherwise requested, copies of the Final EIS will be provided on CD-ROM. Rio Salado Oeste September 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES. 1 INTRODUCTION This Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Los Angeles District, to analyze potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of alternatives for the Rio Salado Oeste ecosystem restoration project. The study area is geographically located in the City of Phoenix, which lies within Maricopa County, Arizona. The study area is approximately eight miles long extending from 19th Avenue on the east downstream to 83rd Avenue on the west, and from Lower Buckeye Road on the north to Baseline Road on the south. The study area is approximately three miles wide and comprises approximately 23.5 square miles. While this is a large study area extending beyond the riverbanks, any implementation of project features would be associated with the river floodplain in an area referred to as the project implementation area. The project implementation area extends from 19th Avenue on the east to 83rd Avenue on the west, and is the area within the 100-year floodplain of the Salt River. The project implementation area averages two-thirds of a mile in width, and consists of approximately 3,315 acres. The study area lies between two other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ecosystem restoration projects; Rio Salado Phoenix upstream and Tres Rios downstream. Information referred to in this FEIS, as well as in the accompanying Feasibility Report titled Rio Salado Oeste Interim Feasibility Report, Salt River – Phoenix, Arizona (hereafter variously referred to as main report, feasibility report and main feasibility report) and its appendices, is incorporated by reference. The FEIS provides a description of restoration alternatives and the No-Action Alternative; provides an analysis of the existing and future conditions of the area without the project, and; analyzes the impacts associated with five action alternatives that have been determined to be the most feasible. Alternative 5A has been identified as the recommended plan based on its achievement of project objectives and for its level of attainment of completeness, efficiency, effectiveness, and preliminary public acceptability criteria. ES.2 MAJOR CONCLUSIONS ES.2.1 FORMULATION AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES The purpose of the proposed action is to restore degraded riparian ecosystem structure, function and dynamic processes to a more self-sustaining, diverse, and functional condition. Flood damage reduction was evaluated as an additional project purpose, but could not be economically justified. However, incidental flood damage reduction benefits would likely be obtained from an ecosystem restoration project. Potential additional benefits in the project area would include the following: passive recreation; improved water quality, air quality and aesthetics, and; noise reduction. Rio Salado Oeste September 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement ES-1 Specific planning objectives reflect the problems and opportunities for desired positive changes along the Rio Salado Oeste reach of the Salt River. The established objectives were: to restore native riparian, wetland, and floodplain habitats and manage undesirable plant, fish, and wildlife species; to reduce flood damages to infrastructure and structures, and; to improve passive recreation and environmental-education opportunities. Alternative plans were developed during the feasibility study to meet the specified problems and opportunities and planning objective and constraints. The alternatives were then ranked based on completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, and acceptability and twelve were selected for further review. To narrow the array further, the study team determined the most significant criteria to use in comparing alternatives. These were: • Cottonwood/willow is an important and scarce cover type in Arizona and the Southwest. The study team, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD), decided that cottonwood/willow cover type was the highest priority for restoration, followed by mesquite and wetlands. Due to the significance and scarcity of cottonwood/willow, alternatives not including this cover type were eliminated from further consideration. • Since the watershed is developed, tributaries to the river have been replaced by stormwater outfalls. These stormwater outfalls provide opportunities for restoration and for potential water harvesting. These outfalls also provide an inexpensive opportunity to direct additional water to the project area and associated restoration features. The stormwater measure is a necessary component of any alternative because of the restoration opportunities and potential water source. Therefore, alternatives not including that individual component were eliminated from further consideration. • Channel restoration is an important project component for various reasons. It provides a connection to other projects, is a potential means of water distribution, is important for the ecosystem, and contributes to reducing flooding potential. Therefore, alternatives not including that component were not considered. Applying these criteria to the array of alternatives narrowed the list to five alternatives, plus the No-action Alternative. The remaining five alternatives all include channel modification to maximize stormwater retention for habitat use. Alternative 4 includes active restoration of cottonwood and mesquite and emergent habitat, as well as active management to control invasives. Alternative 5 includes all of the above, plus the development of two existing gravel pits into lakes. Alternative 5A, the Recommended Plan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Arizona Project
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short 1982 Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10) 6-9-1982 The Central Arizona Project Jon Kyl Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy- development-and-growth-interbasin-transfers Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Contracts Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Hydrology Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Transportation Law Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Kyl, Jon, "The Central Arizona Project" (1982). New Sources of Water for Energy Development and Growth: Interbasin Transfers: A Short Course (Summer Conference, June 7-10). https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/new-sources-of-water-for-energy-development-and-growth-interbasin- transfers/21 Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. Jon Kyl, The Central Arizona Project, in NEW SOURCES OF WATER FOR ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH: INTERBASIN TRANSFERS (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 1982). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Arizona Water Control Study
    SUMMARY OF ELEMENTS UNDER STUDY How will flood waters be controlled gestions made by citizens at public along the Salt and Gila Rivers? How meetings or through correspondence will Central Arizona Project (CAP) with the two agencies. waters be stored for distribution in central Arizona? Solutions to these To date, the Bureau and Corps have terns will be evaluated using techni­ two critical water problems are being identified a number of structural and cal and environmental criteria. The sought by the Central Arizona Water nonstructural actions that singly or in systems that are determined to be Control Study (formerly known as the combination could provide for flood most acceptable will be studied at an Study of Alternatives for Salt-Gila control and CAP storage. These "ele­ increased !eve! of detail until a pre­ Flood Control and Regulation of CAP ments" were studied in Phase I of the ferred plan or plans can be recom­ Waters) . The U.S. Bbrnau- of Recla­ study and will be studied further in mended. Plans are combinations of mation, with assistance from the U.S. Phase II, along with additional ele systems with the addition of neces­ Army Corps of Engineers, is con­ ments that were added as a result of sary financial, institutional and oper­ ducting the study, with considerable public comment. ational arrangements. At each deci­ involvement of the public in helping sion point the public will be actively develop solutions to the problems. During Phase II, the elements will be involved. The following diagram Many of the ideas discussed in this combined into sys1ems that achieve shows the sequence of the planning summary are a direct result of sug- the goals of the study, and the sys- process.
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Groundwater Flow Model of the Salt River Valley - Phase I
    SDMS DOCID#1142207 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES A REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL OF THE SALT RIVER VALLEY - PHASE I PBOEN~ AC~ MANAGEMENT AREA HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK AND BASIC DATA REPORT BY EDWIN F. CORKHILL, STEVE CORELL, BRADLEY M. HILL. and DAVID A. CARR HYDROLOGY DIVISION MODELING REPORT NO. 6 Phoenix, Arizona April, 1993 ARIZO~A DEPARTMENT OF \'1ATER RESOURCES A REGIONAL GROUND\VATER FLOW MODEL OF THE SALT RIVER VALLEY ~ PHASE I PHOENIX ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK AND BASIC DATA REPORT Final Report by Edwin Corkhilt Steve CorelL Bradley M. HilL and David A. Modeling Report No. 6 Hydrology Division - Groundwater Modeling April 1, 1 Abstract The Phoenix Active :Management Area groundwater flow model focuses on the hydrologic system of the Salt River Valley, the most intensive water use area of the state. The goal of the hydrologic study and modeling effort was to develop a quantitative tool to test various groundwater management scenarios. The predevelopment hydrologic system (circa 1900) of the Salt River Valley is analyzed. Various components of groundwater inflow and outflov,/ are identified. A predevelopment groundviater budget is presented. The total inflows and outflows were in approximate balance and equaled approximately 139J~OO acre-feet per year. The modern hydrologic system (1978-198:-1) is analyzed. The vari.ous components of groundv,:rner inflow and outflov<' are identified. Detailed descriptions of the methodologies used to analyze the components of flow are provided. A groundwater budget for the period 19/X-1 Y88 is presented. The total inflows were approximately 13.5 million acre-feet and the total outflow-, were approximately 14.0 million acre-feet The estimated decrease in the volume of groundwater in storage \\'US 0.5 rnillion acre-feet Various recommendations are provided to improve future data collection and analysis efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region's
    FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 FINAL Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region’s Facilities Historic Context Edited by Lisa M. Meyer September 2014 DSW Region’s Facilities Historic Context Statement CONTENTS Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................. 1-1 Data Sources Consulted ......................................................................................................... 1-5 Current Document ................................................................................................................. 1-8 2. Statement of Context Part 1: DSW Region’s Transmission Power Systems………………………………………… ...................................................................................... 2-1 Temporal Context .................................................................................................................. 2-1 Geographic Context ............................................................................................................... 2-1 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ed Hallenbeck's Oral History Transcript
    Ed Hallenbeck_Transcript.docx Page 1 of 46 CAP Oral History Pam Stevenson (Q): Let’s start off by identifying on the tape that today is Thursday, July 8th of 2004, and I’m Pam Stevenson and we’re here in Mesa to do an interview for the Central Arizona Project and I’ll let you introduce yourself. So go ahead and give me your full name and when you were born. Ed Hallenbeck (A): My name is Ed Hallenbeck and I was born October 10, 1932 in Madison, South Dakota. Q: Can you tell me a little a bit Madison, South Dakota, growing up, was it a farm family? A: No, we had a furniture and undertaking business in a town of about 5,000 which served a large agricultural area. It was a great place to grow up and it was kind of typical Midwest at that time, small town, an innocent place. It had a four-year college in it so we were exposed to some opportunities for higher education right at the beginning. It was a great, great town. Q: Did you go to college there? A: No, I didn’t. I took a few courses there, but I went to South Dakota State University and got a degree in Electrical Engineering. Q: Why did you decide to go into that field? A: Oh, I sort of liked electricity, liked electronics, and that sort of thing - although I didn’t do much of it. Professionally, it’s a great background in engineering. You need engineering in a lot, a lot of areas, construction and design and that sort of thing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Salado Oeste Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona
    Volume 1 of 2 Final Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement Rio Salado Oeste Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona Prepared by: Los Angeles District South Pacific Division September 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes technical and feasibility study planning efforts undertaken to date to establish existing, future without-project, and future with-project conditions within the Rio Salado Oeste, Salt River study area in Phoenix, Arizona, to examine the measures and alternatives developed, and to present a recommended plan. This Feasibility Report serves to document plan formulation efforts in the development of potential alternatives for ecosystem restoration. These efforts will culminate in a complete feasibility report that identifies and recommends an implementable solution to improve the overall ecological health of the river and reestablish a more stable, less degraded, and sustainable condition. The primary problem and focus of much of the efforts discussed in the report relates to the severe degradation and loss of riparian habitat along the Salt River. Historically, the study area supported significant biological resources including extensive riparian and marsh habitats. Urban development, diversion of water to support agriculture, and domestic livestock grazing have eliminated or altered most of the natural vegetation communities that occupied the study area leaving only scattered remnants of the original vegetation communities. Modifications of the river system, such as damming and flow diversion, currently do not allow flows through the study area except during flood events. In addition, sand and gravel mining operations have induced additional changes to the river channel and hydrology. As diversions of water increased, the perennial flows in the river ceased, causing the groundwater table to drop.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 4: Arizona Water Story Video
    LESSON 4: ARIZONA WATER STORY VIDEO Estimated Time for Lesson 1 hour State Standards Addressed Segment 1: Arizona History • Social Studies – S1C2PO1: Describe the legacy and cultures of prehistoric people in the Americas (development of agriculture). • Social Studies – S1C2PO2: Describe the cultures and contributions of the Hohokam people (e.g., location, agriculture, housing, arts and trade networks). • Social Studies – S1C5PO2: Describe the influence of American explorers and trappers on the development of the Southwest. • Social Studies – S1C5PO3: Describe events that led to Arizona becoming a possession of the United States: the Mexican-American War, the Mexican Cession (Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo) and the Gadsden Purchase. • Social Studies – S4C4PO1: Describe the factors that have contributed to the settlement, economic development and growth of major Arizona cities. • Social Studies – S4C4PO2: Describe how Mexico and Arizona are connected by the movement of people, goods and ideas. • Social Studies – S1C7PO1: Describe the economic development of Arizona: mining, ranching, farming and dams. • Social Studies – S4C4PO5: Describe the major economic activities and land-use patterns (e.g., harvesting of natural resources) of regions studied. Segments 2 and 3: SRP and Central Arizona Project (CAP) • Social Studies – S4C2PO1: Describe how the Southwest has distinct physical and cultural characteristics. • Social Studies – S4C2PO3: Locate the landform regions of Arizona (plateau, mountain and desert). • Social Studies – S4C2PO4: Compare the landform regions of Arizona according to their physical features, plants and animals. • Social Studies – S4C2PO5: Describe how regions and places (e.g., the Grand Canyon and the Colorado River) have distinct characteristics. • Science – S3C1: Describe how natural events and human activities impact environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Waddell Dam Breached (In 1992)
    Water Operation and Maintenance Bulletin 11 HISTORIC WADDELL DAM BREACHED (IN 1992) On the cold, rainy morning of December 4, 1992, Waddell Dam was breached, and a large part of this historic structure sunk below the waves of Lake Pleasant. Although the weather proved to be a deterrent (probably a frigid 50 degrees) for many less hardy souls, representa- tives from the Phoenix Area Office, Maricopa Water District, Central Arizona Water Conservation District, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department, and even the Coast Guard, braved the elements to witness the breaching of the original dam. Members of the local news media documented this historical event. Why would anyone, especially the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), want to breach a dam as beautiful as Waddell Dam? Reclamation completed construction of New Waddell Dam, located about 1/2 mile down- stream of Waddell Dam, in October 1992. The historic Waddell Dam, constructed in 1927 by private interests, was the largest multiple arch dam in the world. New Waddell Dam was constructed to store Colorado River water delivered by the Hayden-Rhodes Aqueduct (formerly the Granite Reef Aqueduct) under the Central Arizona Project. With New Waddell Dam, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District could perform scheduled maintenance on the canal between Lake Havasu on the Colorado River to the turnout for the reversible Waddell Canal to the new dam while deliveries continued to downstream customers of the district. The dam could also provide flood protection by controlling riverflows into the Phoenix metropolitan area from the Agua Fria. The new reservoir added 6,300 surface acres to Lake Pleasant, tripling the size of the lake and greatly increasing the recreational value of Lake Pleasant Regional Park.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Environmental Effects of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Pumped Storage Hydropower April 2020
    A Comparison of the Environmental Effects of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Pumped Storage Hydropower April 2020 PNNL-29157 Acknowledgments This work was authored by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), operated by Battelle and supported by the HydroWIRES Initiative of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO), under award or contract number DE-AC05-76RL01830. HydroWIRES Initiative The electricity system in the United States is changing rapidly with the large-scale addition of variable renewables. The flexible capabilities of hydropower, including pumped storage hydropower (PSH), make it well-positioned to aid in integrating these variable resources while supporting grid reliability and resilience. Recognizing these challenges and opportunities, WPTO has launched a new initiative known as HydroWIRES: Water Innovation for a Resilient Electricity System.1 HydroWIRES is focused on understanding and supporting the changing role of hydropower in the evolving electricity system in the United States. Through the HydroWIRES initiative, WPTO seeks to understand and drive utilization of the full potential of hydropower resources to help reduce system-wide costs and contribute to electricity system reliability and resilience, now and into the future. HydroWIRES is distinguished in its close engagement with the DOE National Laboratories. Five National Laboratories—Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and PNNL—work as a team to provide strategic insight and develop connections across the DOE portfolio that add significant value to the HydroWIRES initiative. HydroWIRES operates in conjunction with the DOE Grid Modernization Initiative,2 which focuses on the development of new architectural concepts, tools, and technologies that measure, analyze, predict, protect, and control the grid of the future, and on enabling the institutional conditions that allow for quicker development and widespread adoption of these tools and technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding of No Significant Impact
    INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) to disclose the potential environmental impacts resulting from the proposed construction and operation of Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department’s (MCPRD) proposed Scorpion Bay Marina & Yacht Club (Marina). The Marina would be located along the western shore of Lake Pleasant within Lake Pleasant Regional Park (LPRP). LPRP encompasses 23,361 acres of federally-owned land, including Lake Pleasant itself, which are managed for recreation by MCPRD pursuant to a recreational management agreement between Reclamation and Maricopa County (Contract No. 9-07- 30-L0298, executed June 29, 1990 [1990 Contract]). Lake Pleasant, the reservoir formed by New Waddell Dam, occupies approximately 9,970 surface acres when the reservoir is at its maximum conservation storage elevation of 1,702 feet. New Waddell Dam and Lake Pleasant are part of the Central Arizona Project, a Federal project authorized by the Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-537). The general project area falls within northern Maricopa and southern Yavapai counties. The Marina would be located in Section 8, Township 6 North, Range 1 East, of the Gila and Salt River Baseline and Meridian. The Marina complex encompasses 164 acres, 93 acres of which are below elevation 1,702 feet. As the recreation land management agency for LPRP, MCPRD has determined there is a need for a marina and its associated amenities at LPRP. A marina was included in the LPRP 1995 Master Recreation Plan (MRP), which was the culmination of a comprehensive multi-year planning effort led by MCPRD in its role as Park manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona-Water-Story-Teachers-Guide
    1 Author Alison Smith, SRP Original text by Judy Wheatley, Water Education Foundation Editorial Assistance Catherine May, SRP Crystal Thompson, Central Arizona Project Greg Kornrumph, SRP Karen Collins, SRP Rebecca Davidson, SRP Robert Pane, SRP Shelly Dudley, SRP Steve Westwood, SRP Teacher Review Panel Angela Conklin Carla Hedge Dawn Koberstein Deborah Patton James Cassidy Jean White Joanne Toms Joshua Briese Julia Goucher Kim Wallis-Lindvig Leslie Zraick Sarah Sleasman Photos Arizona Game and Fish Department Central Arizona Project SRP Water Education Foundation Program Sponsors Central Arizona Project and SRP The Arizona Water Story: An Upper Elementary School Unit of Study Unit Overview Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Lesson 1: What We Know About Water ................................................................................................. 8 Activity 1.1: Building Background for the Unit .................................................................................. 9 Students list things they already know about water in an informal pre-assessment of their knowledge level. Activity 1.2: Globe Toss – Water Sources on Earth .......................................................................... 10 Students explore the global water budget through a hands-on game in which the ratio of water to land on Earth is analyzed. Activity 1.3: Global Water Budget ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]