FILE COPY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DECEMBER 9, 1999 8:30 A.M.
CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS 500 SOUTH GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89155
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER 600 SOUTH GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY, SUITE 300 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106 455-3 139
This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:
City of North Las Vegas Clark County Government Center 2200 Civic Center Drive 500 South Grand Central Parkway North Las Vegas, NV 89030 Las Vegas, NV 89155 City of Las Vegas Regional Flood Control District 400 East Stewart 600 South Grand Central Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 AGENDA CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECEMBER 9,1999 8:30 A.M.
I Call to Order / Agenda / Minutes
1. Action to call the meeting to order and approve the agenda
2. Action to approve the minutes of the rescheduled meeting of November 10, 1999
II Consent Agenda - Items #3 through #lO are considered by the Regional Flood Control District Board ofDirectors to be routine and may be acted upon in one motion. However, the Board may discuss any consent item individually if requested by a Board member or a citizen when the consent agenda is considered for approval. Items considered for approval include the staff recommendation.
- Administration
-- 3. Action to accept the project status reports
4. Action to accept the financial reports
5. Action to adopt the amendments to the District’s Operations and Maintenance Manual - 1999 Update -
Design and Construction - 6. Action to approve the request to redistribute funding in the interlocal contract for design of the Tropicana Wash, Paradise Road to Koval Lane - Clark County - 7. Receive a report on the award of bid for construction of the Washington Avenue Channel from Veteran’s Memorial Drive to Union Pacific Railroad - City of Las Vegas
8. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the ninth supplemental interlocal contract for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project - Clark County - 9. Receive a report on the award of bid for construction of the Flamingo Diversion Channel at Decatur, Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project - Clark County Agenda Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 2
10. Action to approve the transfer of $1,706,000 from Fund 286 to Fund 443 to be placed in the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers escrow account for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project
III Discussion Items
11. Action to authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate a professional services contract to prepare a Master Plan Update for the Muddy River Watershed
12. Action to approve a Master Plan Change for the Windmill Wash Outfall System, Phase II Facilities in Bunkerville - Clark County - THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING
13. Freeway Channel Project - Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass Facility from Wall Street to Sahara Avenue - City of Las Vegas
A. Action to accept the project presentation -- B. Action to approve the request to amend the Ten Year Construction program
- C. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the interlocal contract for construction
- 14. Receive a report from the consultant on the 1999 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign; results of a Flood Awareness survey; receive and discuss a proposal for the 2000 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign; and take action as deemed appropriate - 15. Citizens Participation No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter - itself has been specifically included on an agenda as an item upon which action may be taken - Gale Wm. Fraser, II, l?E. General Manager/ChiefEngineer MEMORANDUM BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECEMBER 9,1999 MEETING - Larry Brown Chairman my Of Las Vegas
Cresent Hardy TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ike-Chairman City of Mesquite FROM: GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF Dario Herrera Clark county ENGINEER - Mayor Oscar Goodman city of Las Vegas DATE: DECEMBER 3,1999 Btyan A. Nix - City of Boulder Cky John K. Rhodes City of North Las Vegas I Call to Order / Agenda / Minutes Mayor James Gibson - city of Henderson 1. Action to call the meeting to order and approve the agenda Bruce L. Woodbury Clark County The agenda is in order for approval.
2. Action to approve the minutes of the rescheduled meeting of November lo,1999 - i The minutes are in order for approval.
II Consent Agenda - Items #3 through #lO are considered by the Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors to be routine and may be acted upon in one motion. However, the Board may discuss any consent item individually if requested by a Board member or a citizen when the consent agenda is consideredfor approval. Items consideredfor approval include the staff recommendation.
Administration
3. Action to accept the project status reports The project status reports are in order for approval.
4. Action to accept the financial reports The financial reports are in order for approval.
5. Action to adopt the amendments to the District’s Operations and Maintenance Manual - 1999 Update The District’s Operation and Maintenance Manual was last amended 2 July 13, 1995. It has been necessary since the 1995 revision to clarify
\ some definitions, include new policies, revise the Annual Work Plan d
600 S. Grand Central Parkway, Suite 300 l Las Vegas, Nevada 891064511
(702) 455-3139 l FAX: (702) 455-3870 Website: http://www.cctfcd.org Y -
Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 2 -
submission schedule, and address emergency funding procedures. Changes were made throughout the entire manual to address changes adopted in the Policies and Procedures Manual, Section 16.2 Catastrophic Damage to Flood Control Facilities (Board approved: -. 10/14/99). Staff has updated Forms and Charts to reflect what is currently in use and to standardize the usage of the MWP Facility Number, Facility Name, and Master Plan Facility ID. Sample forms - were added to support the existing requirements of the Annual Maintenance Work Plan submission. Staff has proposed changesto the following sections: -
Section 2.50 - Definitions Section 3.20 - Policies ,- Section 4.11 - Purpose Section 4.22 - Annual Work Plans Section 4.25 - Certification of Compliance - Section 4.34 - Scheduling
Staffhas also proposed the addition of Chapter 5, Emergency Funding - Procedures and corresponding sections. The changes are included in the backup for review and approval. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval. -
Design and Construction - 6. Action to approve the request to redistribute funding in the interlocal contract for design of the Tropicana Wash, Paradise - Road to Koval Lane - Clark County Clark County has submitted a request to reallocate funds within the current interlocal contract. No additional funds are being requested. - Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
7. Receive a report on the award of bid for construction of the Washington Avenue Channel from Veteran’s Memorial Drive to Union Pacific Railroad - City of Las Vegas On October 12, 1999, the City of Las Vegas opened bids for - L
Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 3
construction of the Washington Avenue Channel from Veteran’s Memorial Drive to UPRR. Three bids were received, ranging from an - apparent low bid of $5,590,92 1 to $7,13 1,000. The City evaluated bids, and awarded a contract to Wells Cargo in the amount of $5,590,921. Sufficient fimds are identified in the interlocal contract for the project. - Bid tabulations are included in the backup. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
- 8. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the ninth supplemental interlocal contract for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project - Clark County .- Clark County has submitted a request for a ninth supplemental interlocal contract to reallocate funds for betterments to the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project. At this time the County would like to -- i reallocate and make additional funds available for utility relocations in Decatur Boulevard to match the best bid for the work. Other project costs were reduced to accommodate these increases. No additional funds are being requested at this time. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
9. Receive a report on the award of bid for construction of the Flamingo Diversion Channel at Decatur, Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project - Clark County -- On November 4, 1999, Clark County opened bids for relocation of a 42-inch waterline at Decatur Boulevard associated with the Flamingo - Diversion Channel. This project is a part of the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes project. Six bids were received, ranging from $749,409.12 to $1,15 1,500.21. The County evaluated bids, and - awarded a contract to Darby Neagle Enterprises in the amount of $749,409.12. Sufficient funds are identified in the interlocal contract for this project. Bid tabulations are included in the backup. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
10. Action to approve the transfer of $1,706,000 from Fund 286 to Fund 443 to be placed in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers escrow account for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 4
On January 12, 1995, the Board authorized the Chairman to sign a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Clark County and the U.S. Corps of Engineers for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project. The PCA identifies the District as the agency responsible for the non- federal share of funding for the project, and Clark County as the agency responsible for the acquisition of project rights-of-way. Under the Agreement, the District shall deposit cash contributions to the U.S. Government in an escrow account, with interest accruing to the District.
On September 9, 1999, in conformance with the PCA, the Board _ approved the transfer of $2,534,000 into the Corps Escrow account for the District’s contribution to fund the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project. The amount transferred for this project was based on ,- $15,100,000 of Federal funds budgeted in Fiscal Year 2000. However, Congress has appropriated additional funds for Fiscal Year 2000. The total amount of Federal funds allocated to this project for this fiscal - year is $24,870,000 thus increasing the non-Federal cash requirement to $4,240,000. -- In conformance with the PCA, an additional contribution of $1,706,000 is required by the District in Fiscal Year 2000 for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project. Staff recommends that the Board approve the transfer of that amount from Fund 286 to the Capital Projects Fund 443 to be placed in the Corps escrow account. A copy of the letter from the Corps of Engineers with additional background information is included in the backup. - III Discussion Items
11. Action to authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate a professional services contract to prepare a Master Plan Update for the Muddy River Watershed Funding for preparation of the Master Plan Update was included in the Fiscal Year 1998-99 budget. Those funds have been rolled forward to Fiscal Year 1999-00 to complete the project. It is expected that a Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 5
professional services contract will be before the Board in early 2000. Completion of the Master Plan Update should be finalized and presented to the Board for adoption in early 2001. Staff recommends - the Board authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate a professional services contract with G.C. Wallace, Inc.
12. Action to approve a Master Plan Change for the Windmill Wash Outfall System, Phase II Facilities in Bunkerville - Clark County - THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING Clark County has requested a Master Plan Change to the Windmill Wash Outfall in the Town of Bunkerville. The 1995 Master Plan for the Town of Bunkerville identifies two phases for the Windmill Wash flood control system. Phase I has been completed and includes the Windmill Wash Detention Basin and Jess Waite Wash Diversion. Clark County restudied the Phase II outfall system in response to property owner concerns over expected flood impacts from the extended detention basin outflow. Approval of this change will realign the outfall along a more direct northern route at an estimated 18% cost savings. Furthermore, facilities identified as Phase IIa can be built with unexpended funds from the detention basin project and alleviate the concerns ofthe arearesidents. Staffhas reviewed the technical analysis supporting this request and concurs with its findings and recommendations. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
13. Freeway Channel Project - Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass Facility from Wall Street to Sahara Avenue - City of Las Vegas - A. Action to accept the project presentation A representative of the City of Las Vegas will make a project presentation on the Freeway Channel from Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass facility. This presentation was made at the Citizen’s Advisory Committee on November 29, 1999, Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval. Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 6
B. Action to approve the request to amend the Ten Year Construction program The City of Las Vegas has requested an amendment to the Ten Year Construction Program and current year project list to increase construction funding in the current year for the Freeway Channel Project from Alta Drive to Sahara Boulevard. This will allow for District reimbursement of City funds provided to facilitate construction contract award. To compensate, funds programmed for the Gowan North - Buffalo Branch and Las Vegas Wash - Ranch0 projects have been moved back. The backup includes the affected portion of the Ten Year Plan. - C. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the inter-local contract for construction The City of Las Vegas has requested an interlocal contract in the amount of $30,800,000 to fund the construction and construction engineering for the Freeway Channel, Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass Facility. On April 8, 1999 the Board took action to earmark $28,013,000 of the 1998 Bond proceeds for this project. The City of Las Vegas intends to provide $2,787,000 to facilitate a timely award of a construction contract. This interlocal contract includes language that will allow for reimbursement of funds provided by the City of Las Vegas in excess of the $28,013,000 dependent upon revenue availability. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract. Additional information submitted by City staff after the TAC meeting revealed that right-of-entry condemnation proceedings have commenced. Staff, TAC and CAC recommend approval.
14. Receive a report from the consultant on the 1999 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign; results of a Flood Awareness survey; receive and discuss a proposal for the 2000 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign; and take action as deemed appropriate The Merica Agency, the consultant for the 1999 Flood Safety Campaign, will report on the highlights of the 1999 campaign. In -
1 Memorandum Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Page 7
September 1999, the District contracted with a commercial survey firm to conduct a flood awareness survey of 500 Clark County residents., The results will be discussed at the meeting. A proposal for the 2000 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign will be presented by the Merica Agency. The contract in the amount of $225,000 and scope of services for the 2000 Advertising Campaign is attached for the Board’s consideration. The contract has been reviewed by the District Attorney. On November 29, 1999, the CAC reviewed the contract and recommended approval, subject to CAC review of the public relations portion of the campaign. Staff is requesting that the Board discuss the proposal and take action as deemed appropriate.
15. Citizens Participation No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been specifically included on an agenda as an item upon which action may be taken
Respectfully submitted,
- Gale Wm. Fraser, II, P.E. - General Manager/Chief Engineer -
-7 MINUTES CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS - NOVEMBER 10, 1999
MEETING NOTICES: Public Notices ofthe meeting were posted by Deanna Gardner of the Regional Flood Control District at the following locations: Las Vegas City Hall, North Las Vegas City Hall, - Clark County Government Center, and the Clark County Regional Flood Control offices.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Cresent Hardy, Vice-Chair, City of Mesquite Bruce Woodbury, Clark County John K. Rhodes, City of North Las Vegas - Bryan Nix, City of Boulder City Dario Hen-era, Clark County Oscar B. Goodman, City of Las Vegas .e MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Brown, Chairman, City of Las Vegas James B. Gibson, City of Henderson
STAFF: Gale Wm. Fraser, II, General Manager/Chief Engineer -- Jeanine Pitts-Dilworth, Director of Administrative Services Robert Warhola, Deputy District Attorney Carolyn Frazier, Office Services Manager -- Tim Sutko, Sr. Hydrologist-Environmental Mitigation Mgr. Jill Reilly, Senior Civil Engineer Judy Or-r,Principal Management Analyst Deanna Gardner, Senior Management Analyst Joseph Grippaldi, Management Analyst I Deanna Hughes, Financial Office Specialist
INTERESTED PARTIES: Steve Ford, City of Las Vegas Charlie Kajkowski, City of Las Vegas Bob Will, Will & Carlson \ Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Minutes November lo,1999 Page 2
I Call to Order / Agenda / Minutes
1. Action to call the meeting to order and approve the agenda
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Hardy at 9:07 a.m. in the Clark County Commission Chambers, 500 S. Grand Central Parkway.
- Mr. Fraser stated that the agenda was in order for approval, with the deletion of Item Number 26.
- Councilman Rhodes then moved for approval of the agenda.
VOTES: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
2. Action to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1999 meeting
- Councilman Rhodes moved for approval of the minutes.
--’ VOTES: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
II Consent Agenda - Items #3 through #21
Administration
3. Action to accept the project status reports
4. Action to accept the financial reports
5. Action to accept the first quarter status reports for the Fiscal Year 1999-00 Maintenance Work Program
6. Action to authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to issue a request for proposals, select a consultant, and negotiate a professional services contract to prepare Emergency Action Plans for the Windmill Wash (Bunkerville), Trailhead (Boulder City), Lower Las Vegas Wash, and Upper Flamingo Detention Basins
Design and Construction
7. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the interlocal agreement between Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Minutes November 10, 1999 Page 3
NDOT, RTC and the District for use of office space in the RTURFCD Administration Center
8. Action to receive a report on the award of bid for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project - Red Rock Channel, Section 1OA of the Beltway - Corps of Engineers
9. Action to receive a report on the award of bid for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project, Lower Red Rock Complex - Corps of Engineers
10. Action to receive a report on the award of bid for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes - Project, Blue Diamond Detention Basin - Corps of Engineers
11. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the third supplemental inter-local contract for the Freeway Channel, Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass Facility from Wall Street to Sahara Avenue - City of Las Vegas - 12. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental interlocal contract for the Las Vegas Wash Ranch0 Drive System, Peak Drive to Lake Mead Drive - City of -- Las Vegas
13. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the third supplemental interlocal - contract for the Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion - City of Las Vegas
14. Acton to approve a request for authorization to proceed with the right-of-way acquisition - for Phase I of the Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash, Camino Al Norte to Ann Road - City of North Las Vegas
15. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental inter-local contract for construction of the Vandenberg Detention Basin - City of North Las Vegas
16. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental interlocal contract for design of the Durango Collector - Clark County
17. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental interlocal contract for construction of the Durango Collector - Clark County
18. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the second supplemental interlocal contract for the Duck Creek, Hollywood Boulevard to Stephanie Street project - Clark County Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Minutes November lo,1999 - Page 4
19. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the supplemental inter-local contract for construction of the Tropicana Wash, Paradise Road to Koval Lane - Clark County
20. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the second supplemental inter-local contract for design of the Tropicana Wash, Paradise Road to Koval Lane - Clark County
2 1. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign a request to reallocate the funding - in the interlocal contract for the Red Rock Channel Naples Branch - Clark County
Councilman Nix moved for approval of the consent agenda. - VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
- III Discussion Items
Design and Construction
22. Gowan North System - Buffalo Branch, Buffalo Drive and Craig Road - City of Las Vegas -- a. Action to accept the project presentation
Steve Ford, City of Las Vegas, Department of Public Works made a project presentation.
Councilman Hardy moved to accept the project presentation.
VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
b. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the interlocal contract for construction - Councilman Nix moved for approval.
-- VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
- 23. Ranch0 Road System, Centennial Parkway to Ranch0 Detention Basin - City of Las Vegas
--l a. Action to approve a request to amend the Ten Year Construction Program i Councilman Nix moved for approval. - Clark County Regional Flood Control District b Board of Directors Minutes November lo,1999 - Page 5
VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
b. Action to accept the project presentation
Charlie Kajkowski, City of Las Vegas, Department of Public Works made a project presentation.
- Commissioner Woodbury moved to accept the project presentation.
VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
C. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the interlocal contract between the City and the District for construction management
d. Action to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the participation contract between the City, the Developer and the District
Commissioner Herrera moved to approve Item 23, c and d, together. - vi VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays
-- Administration
24. Receive a report on federal legislation - Bob Will of Will and Carlson gave a report on federal legislation.
25. Action to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Project Cooperation Agreement with Clark County, the Corps of Engineers and the District for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project
Mr. Fraser distributed to Board members “Amendment Number One to the Project Cooperation Agreement among the Department of the Army, Clark County and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District for the Construction of the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, Nevada Flood Control Project”.
Commissioner Woodbury moved for approval.
VOTE: 6 Ayes - 0 Nays Clark County Regional Flood Control District Board of Directors Minutes November lo,1999 Page 6
26. Action to authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate a professional services contract to prepare a Master Plan Update for the Muddy River Watershed
This item was deleted from the agenda.
27. Citizens Participation
Mr. Fraser reminded the Board that the Citizens’ Advisory Committee Flood Control Facilities Tour will take place this coming Saturday, November 13, 1999 at 8:30 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 9:23 a.m.
Respectfully submitted, Attest ) 1999
Cresent Hardy Vice-Chairman
P:\pccommon\STAFF\Admin Sec\ll1099BDMINS.wpd CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
PROJECT STATUS REPORTS - NOVEMBER1999
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Accept the reports.
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #03 DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONkL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
PROJECTSTATUS REPORTS PETITIONER:
GALE WM. FRASER. II. P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
ACCEPT THE REPORTS -
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND: -
The following Project StatusReports for the month of November 1999 are submittedfor your --7_ review:
CURRENT PROJECTS(PROJECT LIST AND BOND PROJECTS) - Pa&rg
1 - 3 Project Charts - 4 - 23 Clark County 24 - 36 City of Las Vegas 37 - 44 Henderson 45 - 56 North Las Vegas 57 Boulder City
OTHER PROJECTSOF INTEREST Page
58 - 69 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 70 - 76 RegionalFlood Control District
Respectfullysubmitted, I I I TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM # ITEM # 03 Date: 12/16/99 Date: 12/09/99 CAC AGENDA ITEM # ManagementAnalyst I Date: 12/16/99 P:\wpinbox\agendas\psritm.wpd I I I I I ii ” ” ’ I ‘:.I
PROJECT STATUS CHART CLARK COUNTY 1998 1999 2000 AS OF 11/30/99 Dea Jan Feb Mw Apr May Jun Jd Aug 8ap Ott NW !Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jd I DESERT INN DB & OUTFALL I I LAKES DB & OUTFALL i PH I-Peace to Tropioansn i PH IL8uffdo Outfdl/DI to Peace :.:..‘7.... . :. PH Ill- Det Baain, D.I., & Durango Gyetems .:..:::i...... - .,.,.,.,.,...,\.,, 1-1 PH IV- Buffalo Cdlactor: 8ahsr.a to D.I. .. .., : LOWER DUCK CREEK DB .. . . :. ;:I’: ” - ’ TROPICANA WASH/Paradise - Koval :.::;,.: .::. .;: ... :. DURANGO COLLECTOR/Twain - Hacienda I- COLORADO AVE STORM DRAIN SYS .:.::.::..:.:.:.:.:..:.:::::.:~:’~:...... _...... I r”’ ‘.’“““.’ DUCK CREEK/Hollywood - Stephanie i UP DUCK, CTL DUCK, L BLUE, BD SP DB’S
RAWHIDE CHANNLE @ SAGE BRUSH - DUCK CREEK/Sunset - Eastern
WASHINGTON COLLECTION SYS
RED ROCK CHNL, NAPLES BRANCH
FLAMINGO WASHlMcLeod - Maryland PKWY
DUCK CREEK/Stephanie - Green Valley CLARK COUNTY - OUTLYING 1998 1999 i 2000 Dee Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 8ep Ott Nov ;Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jd GOODSPRINGS
MUDDY RIVER WEST LEVEE
HIKO SPRINGS OUTFALL CHANNEL
NELSON FLOOD CONTROL
INDIAN SP FLOOD CTL CHNL-PH 1
DEGIQN BID PERIOD CONSTRUCTION / 2000 Jut Aug Sep- Ott Nov ‘Dee Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
WASHINGTON CHANNEL: Sagman - Las Vegas Creek ,..,y.:):;~ ...... ,,.,:.5.:... ..y . .. :: ., Upper Washington Ave. Channel _l..... :. ... :.: .:. ...I ::. Up Wash Ave ChlFreeway Channel iI Alta Dr - UPRR 1 I E Alta Dr - Sahara Ave I ...... :.:.: ... I ,_ :j1::. .:..,:.:. Washington Ave, MLK - l-15 t .:3: ...... ,. r- Angel Park Detention Basin I Gowan North Channel i + Phase 1 .\ :.: Phase 2 : ,. :j:j:.:...:.::.:..: - , y Phase 3 4 Oakey Storm Drain/l-l5 to Decatur I 1 Up Washington Ave Conveyance i Sagman - Bonanza !I Gowan Outfall/Ferril to Kenny I Gowan N Buffalo BrlAtwood to Lone Mtw i Gowan South DB Expansion I Las Vegas Wash: Smoke Ranch System I Ranch0 Rd System (Peak to Lake Mead) I
DESIGN BID PERIOD CONSTRUCTlON PROJECT STATUS CHART 1999 1999 2000
,~~b:z~ 1”’ Jan Feb Mar APT May Jun Jul Aw Sep Ott Nov r Jan Feb Mar Apr May J”,, ~“1
C-l CHANNEL @ LAKE MEAD BLVD I
PITTMAN PARK DB I RAILROAD EAST DB
BLACK MOUNTAIN DB
PIONEER DB
PIONEER DBlOUTFALL
C-l CHNLlMlDDEL & UPPER
PITTMAN EAST DB - : -:,’ A:.:... m SOUTH PITTMAN DB - ” 1998 1999 2000 Dee Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Ott Nov i,Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul I I NORTH LAS VEGAS 8
RANGE WASH CHANNEL Y WEST TRIBUTARY y “A” CHANNEL: LAKE MEAD TO I I LAS VEGAS WASH, W. TRIBITARY I I WTLVW: CAMINO AL NORTE to ANN I I Ph I - Ann to Clayton I I Ph II- Ann to Centennial u Ph III - Dst Basin to Camin Al Norte ::ai
TAIB to the W TRIB 8 CRAIG 1-A” Channel Craig Confl)
VANDENBERG DET BASIN , BOULDER CITY 1I I I NORTH RAILROAD WATERSHED . .. i
DESIGN BID PERIOD CONSTRUCTION REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT , - PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLAI 2A97 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 Project: Desert Inn Detention Basin and Outfall
Description: Construct Detention Basin and Outfall
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $250,000 (Design: $250,000; ROW; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: 4127199 BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: 9121I99 CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: 1 o/25/99 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 6/21/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E.. LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: VTN Nevada
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Began basin excavation. Began placement of embankment material.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Continue basin excavation and placement of embankment material. Begin installation of inlet pipe structure.
Project Manager: Kingston Phone: 455-6080
,-
-4- L REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT - Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999 - RFCD Project Number Design: CLAI 3A97 RFCD Project Number Construction: CLAI 3C98 Review Period: November 1999
Project: Lakes Detention (2) - Buffalo Outfall - D.I. to Peace Description: Construct Storm Drain within Buffalo Drive.
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction: 34% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $300,000 - (Design: $300,000; ROW; Construction Management; Construction)
- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: 2/l 9199 BIDS OPENED: 3/l 8199 - BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: 819199 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 4/5/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): --
Consultant/Project Manager: PBS & J - Delays or Problem Areas: - Work Completed During Current Month: Placed RC boxes in Buffalo from Rosanna to south of Flamingo. Paved Buffalo from Peace Way to Rosanna.
- I Work to be Completed During Next Month: Continue installation of RC boxes in Buffalo south of il Flamingo and Flamingo to Viking. Pave Flamingo to Rosanna. - I(
Project Manager: Lecker Phone: 455-l 590 -
-
/
-5- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLAI 3A97 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 - Project: Lakes Detention (3) - Detention Basin, D.I. & Durango Systems
Description: Construct Detention Basin and Storm Drain in D.1. and Durango -
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $300,000 (Design: $300,000; ROW; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: 12/28/99 CONSTRUCTION START: 2/2/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 4/ouo 1 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: PBS 8 J
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Deleted Durango storm drain and landscaping from project (these items to be constructed with other projects).
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Advertise project and open bids.
Project Manager: Kingston Phone: 4556080
-6- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLA13A97 RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period: November 1999
Project: Lakes Detention (4) - Buffalo Collector - Sahara to D.I.
Description: Construct Storm Drain in Buffalo Drive
Percent Complete: Design: 85% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $300,000 (Design: $300,000; ROW; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: ‘WL5-/w DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: 5 /Li/Li~ BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: 9 /L5-/4;4 CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: b /3c,/oo CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: PBS & J
Delays or Problem Areas: Coordination with future roadway project.
Work Completed During Current Month: Project on hold for possible coordination with future - roadway project.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: I
- Project Manager: Kingston Phone: 455-6080
-7- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLA08B93 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin
Description: Construct Detention Basin
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $9,000,000 Construction: 11% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $6,000,000 (Design; ROW: $5,956,000; Construction Management; Construction Other: $44,000)
Consultant/Project Manager: Montgomery Watson
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Excavated west part of basin. Excavated for inlet structure. Crushing of native rock on site by Las Vegas Paving to generate Type II.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Place concrete for inlet structure and continue basin excavation.
- Project Manager: Lecker Phone: 455-l 590
-8- -
- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
L-l PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLAlOA97 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Tropicana Wash - Paradise to Koval
Description: Flood Control Channels and related facilities
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction: 27% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $240,000 (Design: $230,000; ROW: $10,000; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: 6/I 6199 BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: 7/l I99 CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: 9115199 - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 4/l o/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: Louis Berger & Associates
Delays or Problem Areas: Awaiting approval for CM contract funding.
Work Completed During Current Month: Completed 80 percent of concrete invert. Placed 570 linear feet of concrete walls and deck along Harmon. Excavated for RCP under Harmon.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Complete 60” RCP in Harmon, east of Koval. Comolete 600 linear feet of RC box wall and deck. Comolete Harmon Bridae north.
Project Manager: Lecker Phone: 4556050
-
-9- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLAO9A97 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Durango Collector - Twain to Hacienda
Description: Flood Control Channels and related facilities
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $388,000 (Design: $373,000; ROW: $15,000; Construction Management; Construction) - SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: l/03/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 2/06/01 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: Black & Veatch
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Prepared for construction.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Hold pre-con on 12/3/99. Prepare for l/3/00 NTP issuance. -
Project Manager: Kilmer Phone: 4556074
-lO- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period: November 1999
Project: Colorado Avenue Storm Drain System
Description: Design of Storm Drain System - Colorado and Olive Avenues
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $11 ,OOO,OOO Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design; ROW; - Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: 9130199 BIDS OPENED: 1I1 4100 BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: G. C. Wallace
Delays or Problem Areas: Added Lamb storm drain to project.
- Work Completed During Current Month: Finalized plans and specifications, including the addition to the Lamb Blvd. Storm drain lateral design. Completed signatures from the utilities and agencies. Prepared to advertise project.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Advertise project and hold pre-bid. Open bids.
Project Manager: Catanese Phone: 455-6050
-
-ll- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLA14A97ID RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie
Description: Flood Control Channel
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction) - SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: - BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: .- OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: G. C. Wallace
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Continued work on pre-design.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Continue pre-design.
Project Manager: Kilmer Phone: 4556074
-
-12- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - PROJECT STATUS REPORT L
- Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: CLA16A98 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 Project: Up. Duck, CTL Duck, LWR Blue Diamond, Bird Springs Detention Basins
Description: Location Studies for flood control detention basins
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE - DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
-- Consultant/Project Manager: Montgomery Watson
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Prepared final draft report.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Finalize report.
Project Manager: Davis Phone: 4556075
-
-13- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT - Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: CLA02G99ID RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period: November 1999 Project: Rawhide Channel at Sagebrush
Description: Remove undersize pipes, construct box culverts.
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction)
Consultant/Project Manager: - Delays or Problem Areas: - Work Completed During Current Month: Held pre-con.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Begin construction. -
Project Manager: Torrey Phone: 4556046
-
-
-.
-
-14- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLA14C99ID RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Duck Creek - Sunset to Eastern
Description: Flood Control Channel
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE I ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): --
Consultant/Project Manager: - Delays or Problem Areas:
- Work Completed During Current Month: Worked on survey.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Receive survey and continue pre-design.
- Project Manager: Pennington Phone: 4556069
-
-15- -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ? PROJECT STATUS REPORT _ - Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLAZOA99 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Washington Collection System
Description: Construct storm drain
Percent Complete: Design: 70% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction)
- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 12/30/99 BIDS OPENED: Ill 5100 - CONSTRUCTION START: 2/I IO0 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 8/30/00 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): ,--
Consultant/Project Manager:
r Delays or Problem Areas: UNLV designing linear park which could affect project schedule.
Work Completed During Current Month: Worked on design of profile and hydraulic gradient.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Prepare plans, profile, and special details.
- Project Manager: Judd Phone: 455-6070
-
-16- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: CLA19A99 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Red Rock Channel - Naples Branch
Description: Flood Control Conveyance facility
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 11/3/00 DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: 12/l 5/00 BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: 2/I cd00 CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 12/l 5101 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: VTN I~--Delays or Problem Areas: Work Completed During Current Month: Submitted alternative alignment and hydrology memo. -
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Draft pre-design report.
Project Manager: Davis Phone: 455-6075
-
-17- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999 - RFCD Project Number Design: CLA04E99/D RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Flamingo Wash - McLeod Drive to Maryland Parkway
Description:
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction:; Other:) -
-
,--
Consultant/Project Manager: Montgomery Watson
Delays or Problem Areas: -
Work Completed During Current Month: Completed contract negotiations. - Work to be Completed During Next Month: Begin project.
Project Manager: Kingston Phone: 4556080
-18- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: GSPOlA88 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Goodsprings - Flood Control
Description: Design & Construct Berm & Channel along south side of town and widen Channel along Pacific Street on North side of town.
Percent Complete: Design: 98% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $525,000 Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $99,000 (Design: $40,400; ROW: $39,000; Construction Management; Construction: $18,600; Other: $1,000)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 12/30/99 DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: -- OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
- Consultant/Project Manager: G. C. Wallace
Delays or Problem Areas: Determine if sufficient funding for ROW acquisition. - Work Completed During Current Month: Continued design work.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Obtain survey information from consultants. Update cost estimate and quantities. -
Project Manager: Gallt Phone: 4556094
-
-19- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999
Project: Duck Creek - Stephanie to Green Valley
Description: Flood Control Channel
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW:; Construction Management; Construction) -
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E.. LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E.. LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: IIDelays or Problem Areas: Work Completed During Current Month: Received topographic survey and began researching parcels and deeds.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Determine ROW take parcels and begin layout drawings.
Project Manager: Ainsworth Phone: 4556071
-2o- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: MOAOI B89 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 Project: Moapa Valley - Muddy River (West) Levee
Description: Design Channel/Levee Combination
Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,259,000 Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $1,850,000 (Design: $330,000; ROW: $1520,000; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
Consultant/Project Manager: G. C. Wallace
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: TAB adopted floodproofing option.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: -
Project Manager: Catanese Phone: 455-6050
-21- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: LAU03A96 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 Project: Laughlin - Hiko Springs Wash Outfall Channel
Description: Outfall Channel for Detention Basin - Percent Complete: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $7,700,000 Construction: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $525,000 (Design: $495,000; ROW: $30,000; Construction Management; Construction) - ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 7120198 BIDS OPENED: 9/17/98 _ CONSTRUCTION START: 2/l I99 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 9/l 3/99 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): - --
Consultant/Project Manager: Black & Veatch - Delays or Problem Areas: Rain caused flood damage at El Mirage slab structure. - Work Completed During Current Month: Completed all items.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Complete close out paperwork.
Project Manager: Wondra Phone: 455-6330
-22- - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT L
Entity: Clark County Date Prepared: November 30, 1999
RFCD Project Number Design: lNDOlA98/D RFC Project Number Construction: Review Period: November 1999 Project: Indian Springs Flood Control - Phase 1
Description: Construct Flood Control Facilities.
Percent Complete: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Construction INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Design:; ROW; Construction Management; Construction)
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 6/30/00 DESIGN: BIDS OPENED: 7/l 5100 BIDS OPENED: CONSTRUCTION START: 8/l 5100 CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 3/30/o 1 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
-- Consultant/Project Manager:
Delays or Problem Areas:
Work Completed During Current Month: Received Town Board acceptance of Master Plan Update.
Work to be Completed During Next Month: Prepare Master Plan amendment document.
Project Manager: Gallt Phone: 455-6094
-
-
,
/
- -23- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTiON #: LAS09N99
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
PROJECT: UPPER WASHINGTON AVENUE CHANNEL - VETERAN’S MEMORIAL TO UPRR _
DESCRIPTION: Construct 12’ X 8’ RCB from Veteran’s Memorial to UPRR
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $6,590,000 Constr: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $6,590,000
(Predesign $ ;Design $ ; ROW ; Const Management $ ,* Construction $ 6,590,OOO 1 . -
.. -
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Carter-Burgess, Inc.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Phase II - Bids opened lO/ 12/99. Low bidder was Wells Cargo, Inc. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Phase II - Begin construction.
PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-22 12
-24- . .
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - PROJECT STATUS REPORT
L- ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LASO9L98 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LASO9L98 - REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
PROJECT: FREEWAY CHANNEL SYSTEM / ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE
DESCRIPTION: Design of triple 12 X 9’ RCB drains from Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and a - single 10’ X 8’ RCB along Western Avenue from Wall to Sahara for the Freeway Channel Facilities.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 90% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3 1 ,ooo,ooo Con&r: % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $3 1 ,ooo,ooo
(Predesign $ ; Design $1,549.000; ROW $ 2,000; Const Management $ *, Construction $29.449.000 )
I SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE I
DESIGN: 09/ 15/99
BIDS OPEN: 1 01/01/00 BIDS OPEN:
I CONSTRUCTION START:
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
OTHER (Define):
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Parsons’Brinckerhoff
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Submitted revised Interlocal Contracts for CCRFCD Board approval to extend the system in Charleston Blvd. to Tonopah Drive and increase construction amount to $30.8 million.
- WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Submit 99% plans on 12/01/99. City to file right-of-entry -
PROJECT MANAGER: Marvin D. Stine, P.E. PHONE #: 229-6730
-
‘d
-25- . ..
-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT n PROJECT STATUS REPORT - ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LAS14A95 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LAS14A95 -- REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 11/23/99
PROJECT: WASHINGTON AVENUE/I-l5 TO MLK AND FREEWAY CHANNEL NORTH -
DESCRIPTION: Roadway and flood control, improvements on Washington Avenue between MLK Boulevard 8, I-15 and Freeway Channel North from Washington to Owens. (RFCD/RTC proj) - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 70% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $217,00O(RFC/RTC) Constr: % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $70,000 (RFC)
(Predesign $ ., Design $70,00O;ROW $ ; Const Management $ ; Construction $ ) - I
-
.-
CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
-
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Pentacore Engineering
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
70% plans were submitted for review.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Revise hydrology study to include segment between Washington and Owens.
PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-22 12
-26- _-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT --
kl ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LAS0 lB95
- REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
- PROJECT: ANGEL PARK DETENTION BASIN EXPANSION
DESCRIPTION: Phase I - Excavation of 218,000 cubic yards by NDOT is complete. Phase II - Excavation of 60,000 CY by the Las Vegas Sports at no cost to the District. - Phase III - Excavation of 160,000 CY to fill washes immediately downstream of the Basin.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 9O%PH3 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,215,000 Ph3 Cons: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:
(Redesign $ ;Design$ ;ROW$ ;
- Const Management $ ; Const $ 1,215,OOO; Other 1
- SCHEDULED PHASE PHASE ACTUAL PHASE PHASE COMPLETION II III COMPLETION II III DESIGN: 10/99 DESIGN: - BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN:
- .-.l CONSTR. START: Ol/OO CONSTR. START: .- CONSTR. COMPLETE: 07/00 CONSTR. COMPLETE:
- OTHER: OTHER:
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Project Engineers of Nevada
- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
- WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Phase 3 - Worked on design drawings for filling area below spillway. -
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - Prepare bid package for Purchasing and Contracts.
PROJECT MANAGER: Randy Fultz, P.E. PHONE #: 229-654 1
-27- -
- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT -?
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LAS10198 CfUQ - REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
PROJECT: DURANGO DRIVE - CHEYENNE TO LONE MOUNTAIN - DESCRIPTION: Design full width roadway improvements and storm drain facilities on Durango Drive from Cheyenne Avenue to Lone Mountain Road. -
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,200,000 Constr: 50% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ -~
(Predesign $ ,*Design$ ;ROW$ ; Const Management $ ,* Construction $ 1 _
SCHEDULED PHASE ACTUAL PHASE COMPLETION I COMPLETION ‘:I - ,l l/ 13/98 12/01/98 IDESIGN: I I DESIGN: l/28/99 5118199 A IBIDS OPEN: I I BIDS OPEN: I 8/01/99 7126199 - ICONSTRUCTION START: I I CONSTRUCTION START: g/03/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I I I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: - IOTHER (Define): OTHER (Define): - CONSULTANT/ PROJECT MANAGER: VTN Nevada
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Construction proceeding on schedule. . -
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue construction.
PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-2122 -
-28- -. REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LASlOD95 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LAS 10198
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
PROJECT: GOWAN NORTH CHANNEL PHASE II BUFFALO TO DURANGO (CONSTRUCTION)
DESCRIPTION: Phase II - Construction from Buffalo to Durango
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5,181,000 Constr: 60 % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $6,692,000
(Predesign $ ; Design $370,000 ; ROW $728.000; Const Management $ 100.000; Construction $ 6,592,OOO )
PHASE ACTUAL PHASE II COMPLETION II ‘. 08/08/97 08/08/97 1 DESIGN: DESIGN: 12/ 17/98 l/05/99 1 BIDS OPEN: I BIDS OPEN: 4/l/99 4/05/99 ICONSTRUCTION START: 8/29/99 ICONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
- OTHER (Define):
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J Engineering/Wayne Horlacher, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Project on schedule.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: _- Continue construction or the channel.
PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Ford, P.E. PHONE #: 229-2324
-29- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LASlOD95 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: -
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 11/23/99 -- PROJECT: GOWAN NORTH C HANNEL PHASE III BUFFALO TO DURANGO (DESIGN)
DESCRIPTION: Phase III - Construction from Durango to Lone Mountain -
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 90% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $580,000 - Con&r: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT:
(Predesign $ -, Design $ ; ROW $ Const Management $ ,- Construction $ i -
SCHEDULED PHASE ACTUAL : PHASE COMPLETION II COMPLETION ‘1.’ II - 12/01/99 DESIGN: 02/01/00 BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: - CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: S/23/01 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: ICONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I OTHER (Define): IOTHER (Define): -
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J Engineering/Wayne Horlacher, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
The 90% plans were received on November 11, 1999.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Review meeting for 90% plans.
PROJECT MANAGER: Marvin Stine, P.E. PHONE #: 229-6730 -
-3o- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: August 30. 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LAS15A95 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #:
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 11/23/99
PROJECT: OAKEY STORM DRAIN - I-15 TO DECATUR BOULEVARD (PRE-DESIGN)
DESCRIPTION: Storm drain in or adjacent to Oakey Boulevard from I-15 to Decatur Boulevard.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Pre -Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $430,000 Design: % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $430,000
(Predesign $ ;Design $425,000; ROW $5,000; Const Management $ *, Construction $ )
. SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
PREDESIGN: 11/23/99 PREDESIGN:
BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: - - CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START:
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
OTHER (Define): OTHER (Define): -
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Carter-Burgess, Inc. -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Consultant submitted addendum to the design report and an archeological impact study for the Meadows Detention Basin.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Continue to meet with the LWWD and coordinate CLV’s work plan in the Meadows Detention Basin with LWWD’s work plan for the Mojave Desert Preserve.
\J PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-22 12
- -31- . . e
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LAS lOF97 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: LASlOF97 -~~
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99 - PROJECT: GOWAN OUTFALL LONE MOUNTAIN BRANCH - FERRIL TO KENNY
DESCRIPTION: Design of a collection system including pipes and an inlet system to the - Gowan OutfaIl System in Lone Mountain from FerriI Street to Kenny Way.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 60% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $150,000 Constr: % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $150,000 -
(Predesign $ : Design $ 147,000; ROW $3,000; Const Management $ ; Construction $ ) _
- ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
;
1 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 1 I I- OTHER (Define): I OTHER (Define): I I
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Kennedy Jenks Chilton / Von Larsen, P.E.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Submitted 60% plans and Design report. Project is behind schedule, consultant is asking for a revised schedule.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Address comments to the drainage study. PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-654 1 1 -32- 1 .
-
-- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT ‘l/
- ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LASlOH98 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #:
- REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99
PROJECT: GOWAN NORTH BUFFALO BRANCH - DESCRIPTION: Storm drain improvements in conjunction with an RTC road project in Buffalo Drive from Atwood Avenue to Lone Mountain Road.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $100,000 Constr: % INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $100,000
(Predesign $ ; Design $100,000 ; ROW $ ; Const Management $ ; Construction $ 1
- , :. .’ ’ SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
- DESIGN: 02/26/99 . DESIGN: 3/ 16/99
BIDS OPEN: s/o1 /oo BIDS OPEN: -d CONSTRUCTION START: 7/01/00 CONSTRUCTION START:
- CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: lO/ 15/01 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
OTHER (Define): OTHER (Define) : - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. Wallace/Carter Burgess
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Clark County SID was canceled.
- WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Revise cost estimates for City of Las Vegas and Regional Transportation Commission participation. -
PROJECT MANAGER: Denis Atwood, P.E. PHONE #: 229-6740
‘J
‘II -33- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT *?
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LAS03D98 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #: - REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 11/23/99
PROJECT: GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION BASIN SPORTS COMPLEX -
DESCRIPTION: Excavation of Detention Basin from 400 acre-ft to 600 acre-feet. Basin will have eight baseball fields that will be elevated above the lo-year storage volume. - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design:S% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Con&r: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $150,000 - (Predesign $ ;Design$ ;ROW$ ; Const Management $ I. Construction $ 1 -
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE ~. ,: I DESIGN’: I A- I BIDS OPEN: I BIDS OPEN: I
CONSTRUCTION START: OS/ 12/00 CONSTRUCTION START:
I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I 1 I22101 I IOTHER (Defme):
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. Wallace - Calvin Black
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREA&
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
CLV Parks requested that ballfield dimensions be revised.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Begin Design. PROJECT MANAGER: Joe Christensen, P.E. PHONE #: 229-22 12 I- -34- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: LAS18A98 RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #:
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 1 l/23/99 - PROJECT: PEAK STORM DRAIN (TORREY PINES TO JONES)
DESCRIPTION: Storm drain system from Torrey Pines to Jones Blvd to connect into existing RFCD system in Jones Blvd.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 60% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,160,550 Con&-: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $
(Predesign $ .Design$, ;ROW$ ; Const Management $ z* Construction $ )
- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETIONDATE ’ I I DESIGN:
I BIDS OPEN: I I BIDS OPEN: I I
I CONSTRUCTION START: I I CONSTRUCTION START: I I
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 10/23/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
OTHER (Define): OTHER (Define):
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Project Engineering Consultants/ACEP
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Final predesign meeting was held 1 1 / 18/99.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Submit 70% design drawings.
PROJECT MANAGER: Denis Atwood, P.E. PHONE #: 229-22 12 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CITY OF LAS VEGAS DATE PREPARED: November 23, 1999 RFCD PROJECT DESIGN #: NEW PROJECT RFCD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION #:
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 10/27/99 TO: 11/23/99
PROJECT: RANCH0 ROAD SYSTEM (PEAK DRIVE TO LAKE MEAD
DESCRIPTION: Storm drain system along Ranch0 Drive from Peak Drive to Lake Mead Dr. Present conceptual design for the expansion of the Carey/Lake Mead Detention Basin
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 10% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 2,303,500 Con&r: INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $
(Predesign $ ;Design$ ;ROW$ ; Const Management $ *L Construction $ )
I 1 I ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE .: I-’ : I DESIGN: t-- 1 BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: I
CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: - 8/24/01 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
IOTHER (Define): OTHER (Define):
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Montgomery Watson/ACEP
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Final predesign meeting was held 1 l/ 17/99
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Submit predesign report.
PROJECT MANAGER: Denis Atwood, P.E./ACEP PHONE #: 229-22 12 ‘-
-36- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: November 22, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction:
Review Period From: 1l/1/99 -J-o: 11/30/99 PROJECT: C-l CHANNEL SYSTEM DESIGN (MISSION HILLS) DESCRIPTION: MISSION HILLS DETENTION BASIN AND OUTLET WORKS PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $7,150.00 Const: 99% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ Design $ ROW $ Construction Management $300,000 Construction $6,000,000
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: COMPLETE DESIGN: COMPLETE BIDS OPEN: COMPLETE BIDS OPEN: COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION START: COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION START: - 99% COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: --J OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: KEN GAILE ?ETH, VTN-NEVADA
-
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
- Bonding company took over the project.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - City Attorney working with bonding company (legal council) to complete the project.
- WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue work with bonding company.
-
-
’ ;j PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P.E. PHONE#: 5652140
F:\HOME\SHRDPWiWP\E_LANDUIMADWXFCDnewfonnl.doc
-37- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: November 22,1999 I--\ RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period From: 1l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: RAILROAD EAST DETENTION BASIN - DESCRIPTION: PERCENT COMPLETE: Pre-design:100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $9,600,000 - Design:90% Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ - Design $ ROW $ Construction Management $ Construction $ -~
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: KEN GAILBRETH, VTN-NEVADA
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Right of way.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Met with Parks & Recreationto explore possibilities of joint use. Received 90% plans. Met with property owners and City Attorney to resolve right of way issues.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Begin plan check of 90% plans.
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P.E. PHONE #: 5652140
FAHOME\SHRDPWWP\E_LAND iAHMAD\CCRFCDnewforml .doc
-38- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: November 22, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: BLACK MOUNTAIN DETENTION BASIN DESCRIPTION: PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5,600,000.00 Const:32% 60% INTERLOCALCONTRACT AMOUNT: $ Design $ ROW. $ Construction Management $ Construction $
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: 02198 DESIGN: 3/99 BIDS OPEN: 4/99 BIDS OPEN: 4129199 CONSTRUCTION START: 6/99 CONSTRUCTION START: 6199 I I I I - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 1 3/00 1 1 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: KEN GAILBRETH, VTN-NEVADA
- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: NONE
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Placementof outfall pipe spillway 100% complete. Excavationand construction of levee.
- WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue construction. -
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P.E. PHONE#: 565-2140
- F:WOME\SHFUlPW\WP\E_LAND UHMAD\CCRFCDnewforrnl
-39- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 ‘- RFCD Project Number Design: HEN.05.A.92 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 11/01/99 To: 11/22/99 PROJECT: PIONEER DETENTION BASIN DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PIONEER DETENTION BASIN PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 90% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5,622,880 - Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $3,749,485 Design $335,000 ROW $3,414,485 F ConstructionManagement $0 Construction $0 -
SCHEDULED COM@LETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE I - DESIGN: I-12/99 I BIDS OPEN: 1-Ffee 7/OO BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: I 37w 9/00 CONSTRUCTION START: 1 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: piwo/o1 1 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: L OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: k Design to be modified to remove embankment from NDOT ROW. New appraisalsrequired to start condemnation.Rezoning to begin after basin ROW acquired.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: ADesign , modifications m under way.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: m Complete design modifications, submit to District for review. Obtain new appraisals.
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, PI. PHONE #: 5652036 file: p:tinbox\agendas\project status c-l
-4o- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: November 22, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number ‘Construction:
Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: PIONEER DETENTION BASIN/OUTFALL Phase 1 DESCRIPTION: Construction 12’x6’ Reinforced Concrete Box Warm Springs Road north of Cornucopia Avenue PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5,000,000 Const: 2% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ Design $4,800,000 ROW $ Construction Management $50,000 Construction $
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: 12198 DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: 8199 BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: 9/99 CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 2/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): -d CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: KEN GAILBRETH, VTN-NEVADA
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: NDOT permits - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Begin excavation and placement of R.C.B at the north end.
-
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue placement of R.C.B.
-
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P.E. PHONE #: 565-2 140
F:\HOME\SHRDPWlWP\E~LAND\AHMAD\CCRFCDnewforrnl.doc -41-
- / REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: HEN.04.K.99 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 11/l/99 To: 11/22/99 PROJECT: C-l CHANNEL MIDDLE AND UPPER REACHES DESCRIPTION: DESIGN OF THE MIDDLE AND UPPER REACHES OF THE C-l CHANNEL PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: l-Q-15% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $6366,000 - Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $505,000 Design $500,000 ROW $5,000 -
Construction Management $0 Construction $0 -
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SYNDI DUDLEY - LOUIS BERGER -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - None
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - . . . L 1 , Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling begun.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Continue design, submit 30 percentplans.
PROJECT MANAGER: Ed McGuire, P.E. PHONE #: 5652036 file: p:\inbox\agendas\project status c-l -42- - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: NOVEMBER 22. 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: HEN.090A.99 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 11/l/99 To 11/22/99 PROJECT: PIllMAN EASTERN DETENTION BASIN DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PIllMAN EASTERN DETENTION BASIN - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 90% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $11,385,000 Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $55,000 Design $5,000 ROW $50,000 Construction Management $0 Construction $0
-
I- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: VI+99 12/99 DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: 2$88-3/m BIDS OPEN:
- CONSTRUCTION START: +-a 5100 CONSTRUCTION START:
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: W 6/01 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: -.-l OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: w . . Developer agreementhas not beenfinalized. WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
I3eH%bk Receivedmodified right-of-way grant from BLM. All right-of-way now in place.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: -- Execute funding agreementwith developers. Continue proceedings to clear mining claims. Obtain Army Corps of Engineerspermit, and state dam safety permitr Complete 100 percentdesign drawings.
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P.E. PHONE #: 565-2036 file: p:tinboxbgendas\project status c-l -43- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT .“x Entity: CITY OF HENDERSON Date Prepared: NOVEMBER 22, 1999 RFCD Project Number Design: HEN. 1O-B.99 RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 11/01/99 To 11/22/99
PROJECT: SOUTH PITTMAN DETENTION BASIN DESCRLPTJON: CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH PITTMAN DETENTION BASIN PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 90% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,227,000 Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $3,000,000 _ Design $0 ROW $0 ConstructionManagement $400,000 Construction $2,600,000 _
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: FI-W 12199 DESIGN:
BIDS OPEN: 3fee WOO BIDS OPEN: - CONSTRUCTION START: 4fee-1 o/o0 CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 6+6+ ll/Ol CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: - I OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Calvin Black, G.C. Wallace -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None RCC spillway cannot be constructedin the summer.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: . . 2 , Complete specifications.
PROJECT MANAGER: Curt Chandler, P,E. PHONE #: 5652036 file: p:\inbox\agendas\project status c-l - - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11I23199 RFCD Project Number Design: NLV.OS.A.94 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A Review Period From: 11/l/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Lower Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin DESCRIPTION: Design and right-of-way engineering/acquisitionof the Lower Las Vegas Wash .- Detention Basin. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ -- INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $2,650,000 Design $550,000 ROW $2,050,000 - ConstructionManagement $ Construction $
- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: - DESIGN: 08197 BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: 09197
- CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: 10/97 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 03199 -d OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): N/A CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: VTN Nevada/Ken Gilbreth, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: . Right-of-way acquisition settlements.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
- PROJECT MANAGER: JamesA. Bell, P.E. PHONE #: 399-l 100 -45-
51212.rfc.wpd b
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity : City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1 l/23/99 RFCD Project Number Design: NLV.09.A.94 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A A Review Period From: 1l/1/99 To: 1l/30/99 - PROJECT: Western Tributary of the Range Wash Channel DESCRIPTION: Design and right-of-way engineering/acquisitionof the Range Wash Channel, from Confluence Detention Basin to Craig Road, including the VandenbergDetention Basin. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ Const: 1% ’ INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $2,800,000
Design $700,000 ROW $2,100,000 -
ConstructionManagement $ Construction $ -
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J/KenMacDonald, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: . None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
0 Continuation of the project during construction can be found under the VandenbergDetention Basin Project StatusReport.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas Brady, P.E. PHONE #: 633-1227
-46- -
10031.rfc.vi@ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11/23/99 RFCD Project Number Design: NLV. lO.A.97 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A u Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 - PROJECT: Las Vegas Wash Western Tributary (“A” Channel), PhaseI DESCRIPTION: Preliminary design of approximately 2 miles of channel lining and culvert improvements between Alexander Road and Lake Mead Boulevard at Pecos Road. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 30% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ N/A Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $1,400,000 Design $590,000 ROW $ N/A ConstructionManagement $ Pending Construction $ N/A
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: 07199 DESIGN: 07199 BIDS OPEN: TBD BIDS OPEN: TBD
- CONSTRUCTION START: TBD CONSTRUCTION START: TBD CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD
-4 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): TBD OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): TBD CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Black & Veatch/Dana Reel, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - . None.
- WORK COMPLETEa DURING CURRENT MONTH:
l Project Closeout continued.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - l Anticipate completion of final report to be placed on District’s Agenda in December.
PROJECT MANAGER: Dennis Fritz, P.E. PHONE #: 399-l 100
-47-
51229.rfc.wp-J , REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1l/23/99 - RFCD Project Number Design: NLV. lO.A.97 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A /--Y Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 1l/30/99 - PROJECT: Las Vegas Wash Facilities Study DESCRIPTION: The study will provide preliminary engineering and development parametersfor approximately twelve (12) miles of the Las Vegas Wash, from Interstate-15south, to the Monson Channel Confluence. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 0% , ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 700,000 Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $1,400,000 - Design $610,000 ROW $0 ConstructionManagement $0 Construction $ 0 -
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. Wallace/Calvin Black, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: . ProfessionalEngineering ServicesAgreement, scopeof services,and fee schedulewere finalized with the design consultant.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
. Anticipate City Council approval of the Professional Services Agreement and authorization to issue Notice to Proceed for preliminary design tasks to the design consultant in December.
PROJECT MANAGER: Jodi E. McMillin, PHONE #: 399-l 100 -a- 51229.rfc.wpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11I23199 RFCD Project Number Design: NLV.lO.A.97 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A Review Period From: 11/l/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: CheyennePeaking Basin, Phase 3 DESCRIPTION: Preliminary design and right-of-way engineering for the CheyeMe Peaking Basin. Final design for a reach of the “A” Channel, boundedby CheyenneAvenue to the south and Alexander Road to the north. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,900,000 Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $1,400,000 Design $350,000 ROW $ N/A ConstructionManagement $ Pending Construction $ N/A
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: TBD DESIGN: TBD BIDS OPEN: TBD BIDS OPEN: TBD CONSTRUCTION START: TBD CONSTRUCTION START: TBD CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): TBD OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): TBD CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: VTN,Nevada/Ken Gilbreth, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 0 Completednegotiations and reviews of a ProfessionalEngineering Services Agreement with the design consultant, VTN, Nevada, for a fee not-to-exceed$483,624. l Continued preparation of a contract with an appraiserto appraisethe proposed site of the Peaking Basin.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: 0 Anticipate City Council approval of the Professional Engineering Services Agreement with VTN, Nevada. . Anticipate issuanceof a Notice to Proceedto VTN-Nevada to commence design. . Commence aerial photography. l Commence contact with potentially-affectedproperty owners.
PROJECT MANAGER: Marge Brake, P.E. PHONE #: 399-l 100 - -
3 51270.rfc.wp.i REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11I23199 - RFCD Project Number Design: NLV.lO.A.97 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A n Review Period From: 1l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 - PROJECT: Las Vegas Wash (“A” Channel) Bridges (3), Phase4 DESCRIPTION: Final design and construction of “A” Channel culvert improvementsat Cheyenne Avenue, Las Vegas Boulevard and Carey Avenue. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 0% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,700,000 -- Const: 0% ’ INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $1,400,000
Design $220,000 ROW $ N/A - ConstructionManagement $ Pending Construction $ N/A -
- CONSTRUCTION START: -
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Louis Berger/Syndi Dudley, Ph.D., P.E. -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 0 Continued to draft the Professional Engineering Services Agreement, scope of services, and fee schedulewith the design consultant.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
0 Complete preparationof the Professional Engineering ServicesAgreement.
PROJECT MANAGER: Darren L. Schulz, PHONE #: 633-1253 -5o- _-
51269.rfc.wpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1l/23/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: NLV.ll.C98 Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 11/30/99
PROJECT: Western Tributary Las Vegas Wash, Phase 1, (AM Road to Clayton Street), the Clayton Street Channel Confluence, and the Simmons Channel Confluence. DESCRIPTION: Construction of approximately 3,500 1.f. of lined channel, and box culverts at various street crossings. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,328,044 Const: 99% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, CONST. : $8,328,044 Design ROW ConstructionManagement $441,300 Construction $7,501,200
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: 11198 BIDS OPEN: 1 l/98 CONSTRUCTION START: 01/99 CONSTRUCTION START: 01/99 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 1 l/99 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: lo/99 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. Wallace/Don Hotchkiss, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: l Additional safety/security fencing, which was requestedduring a final inspection by Regional Flood Control District Staff, utilizing funds remaining in the contract, has not yet arrived for installation.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
0 The contractor, MK-Heavy Civil, continuedworking on final punch list items.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
. Additional safety/security fencing to be installed by the contractor immediately upon arrival of material. . Completion of punch list items. . Commence Project closeoutdocumentation.
PROJECT MANAGER: William Marshall, PHONE #: 633-1245 -51-
10026 and 10028A.rfc.wpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1l/23/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: NLV.lI.EO. Review Period From: 11/l/99 To: 11/30/99 - PROJECT: Western Tributary Las Vegas Wash, Phase2, (Ann Road to Centennial Parkway) - DESCRIPTION: Construction of approximately l-1/3 miles of lined channel, and six (6) box culverts at various street crossings. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,241,250 - Const: 15% ’ INTERLOCAL CONTRACT CONST. : $8,241,250 - Design $ ROW $
ConstructionManagement $550,659 Construction $7,135,038 -
- CONSTRUCTION CTION START: --
- CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PentacoreEngineering/Keith Ferguson, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
l Excavation was completed in all reaches,by the contractor, M-K Heavy Civil, except for Reaches20. 22. b Installation of a water main and casingswas completed in Reach 8. 0 Geogrid in subgradefor Reaches16-19 has been installed.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
. Complete installation of water main and casings in Reach 21. l Continue pouring of concrete inverts in Reaches8, 19,23, and 24. l Complete subgradepreparation in Reaches7-19. l Continue pouring walls in Reaches23 and 24.
PROJECT MANAGER: William Marshall, PHONE #: 633-1245 -52-
10029.rfc.wpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11I23199 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: NLV.ll.D99 Review Period From: 1l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Western Tributary Las Vegas Wash, Phase3, (Lower Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin to Camino Al Norte). DESCRIPTION: Construction of approximately % mile of concrete lined channel. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3,059,254 Const: 92% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, CONST: $3,059,254 Design ROW ConstructionManagement Construction $2,416,906
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: 03199 BIDS OPEN: 03199 CONSTRUCTION START: 05199 CONSTRUCTION START: 05199 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 12199 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: City of North Las Vegas/William Marshall, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
. Backfill was completed in all reachesby the contractor, American Asphalt & Grading.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
a Form and pour walls remaining for the accessramp. 0 Complete fencing. l Anticipate issuing Notification of SubstantialCompletion, and preparing the project punchlist.
PROJECT MANAGER: William Marshall, PHONE #: 633-1245 -53-
10028B.rfc.wpd I REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1 l/23/99 I RFCD Project Number Design: NLV.ll.A.97 RFCD Project Number Construction: .- Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 1 l/30/99 - PROJECT: Western Tributary Las Vegas Wash, Phase4, (Lower Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin to Clayton Street). DESCRIPTION: Design and ROW engineering/acquisitionof approximately 1,460 If. of lined channel. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 5% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, DESIGN: $2,200,000 Design $345,000 ROW $700,ooo - ConstructionManagement Construction -
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE
CONSTRUCTION START: N/A CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: N/A CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: & OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): 1 II OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I I CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: VTN, Nevada/Dan Bender, P.E. -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - . None. - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: -I- 0 Collection of data was completed by the consultant, VTN, Nevada.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: l-- l Commence hydraulic studies.
- PROJECT MANAGER: William Marshall, P.E. PHONE #: 633-1245 -54- -
10028B.rfc.wpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 11I23199 RFCD Project Number Design: NLV. 13.A .98 RFCD Project Number Construction: N/A Review Period From: 1l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: “A” Channel Craig Confluence DESCRIPTION: Design and right-of-way engineering/acquisitionfor box culverts at street crossings and approximately l-3/4 miles of concrete-linedchannel between Craig Road/North 5* Street and Martin Luther King Boulevard/Alexander Road. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 25 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,247,000 Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACTAMOUNT: $ 565,000 Design $267,000 ROW $298,000 ConstructionManagement $ N/A Construction $ N/A
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: 05/00 DESIGN: TBD BIDS OPEN: 06/00 BIDS OPEN: TBD CONSTRUCTION START: 07/00 CONSTRUCTION START: TBD CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: Ol/Ol CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: TBD
OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): 1 TBD 1 1 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): 1 TBD I CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Montgomery Watson/Edwin Paulson, P.E.
- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None. - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 0 The third ProgressMeeting was held in November. . Montgomery Watson continued with preliminary engineering studies including evaluation of the existing facilities, surveying, geotechnicalinvestigation, and alignment evaluations. - . A draft technical Memorandum regarding hydrology for the project was submitted by the consultant for review.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - 0 Montgomery Watsonwill submit alternativesfor drainagefacilities throughthe existing GoldcrestPark which will be evaluatedby the City. 0 Consultant to also complete and submit the draft Preliminary Design Report for review. --’
-55- PROJECT MANAGER: Ali Zenhari, P.E. PHONE #: 399-l 100
- 5126l.rfc.wpd ,
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity : City of North Las Vegas Date Prepared: 1l/23/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: NLV.09.B -\ Review Period From: 1 l/1/99 To: 11/30/99 ~. PROJECT: VandenbergDetention Basin _- DESCRIPTION: Construction of a 350 acre-foot detention basin with reinforced concrete inlet and outlet structures, 4,400 1.f. of 30” diameter low flow outlet pipe, 1,385 1.f. of 8’X6’ reinforced concrete box culvert and associatedappurtenances. - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% 1 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $6523,100 Const: 1% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, CONST. : $6,523,100 - Design $ ROW $ ConstructionManagement $600,000 Construction $5,900,000 -
-
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J/Ben Cass
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: 0 None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: , l Final Notice to Proceedfor Constructionwas issuedto the contractor, Frehner Construction, effective November 15, 1999. 0 A joint Pre-ConstructionMeeting/Partnering Session was held with the contractor in early November. . The construction trailer offices have been installed. . All remaining, environmentally sensitive, Las Vegas Bearpoppy plants have been relocated. l The contractor has commencedsubmitting various technical shop drawing submittals for approval.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
0 Contractor to continue mobilization at the site and begin clearing, excavation, and grading of the new Detention Basin.
-56- PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas Brady, P.E. PHONE #: 633-1227 -
10031.rfc.wpd - PROJECT STATUS REPORT L Ir-.? r;?:! ‘: :i f;: “: pz i;7; i;*; *-i Entity: CITY OF BOULDER CITY Date Prepared: 11 ,23,991
RFCD Project Number Design: NRIN 002 1 RFCD Project No. Construction NRIN 0032, 0039,0040,0065,0064,0067, 0087 0039, 0040, 0065, 0064, 0067,0087 Review Period From: lo/31 /99 to: 11/23/99 PROJECT: North Railroad Watershed
DESCRIPTION: Design of Detention Basin and related items.
PERCENT COMPLETE: -Design: 70% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $80,000
Design $80,000 ROW N/A Construction Mgmt. Construction
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 12/ 15/99 DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: l/1/00 BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: l/15/00 CONSTRUCl-ION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 4/15/00 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: RBF Nevada/Scott Hansen
- IELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None.
-
‘ORE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Preparing plans & specifications for Industrial Road facilities.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Prepare pIa.ns & specifications for Industrial Road facilities.
-
PROJECT MANAGER: Scott Hansen, P.E. PHONE#: (702) 293-9200 City Engineer
CCRFCD Proj Stat Rpt NRR Watershed 11/99 -57- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT - Entity: U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS)/CLARK Date COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Prepared: 1 l/19/9$3-.. RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Red Rock Detention Basin Expansion - DESCRIPTION: Modifications to existing basin, including excavation of impoundment area, adding orifice plate to outlet works, and adding supplementalreinforced concrete emergency spillway. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $7,096,570 - Const: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $NA - Design $1,342,500 ROW $
Construction Management $671,300 Construction $5,082,770 -
I ~SCHEDULED COMPLETION ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DATE I DESIGN: !
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 12196 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehm -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Corps will turn over dam to local sponsorswhen permanent scour protection is completed. The temporary remedy was completed on July 24, 1998. The permanent remedy may cost $1 million. Work to provide the permanentfix won’t begin until January pending resolving environmental conditions imposed by BLM, which affect the design of the work.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Corps contractor continued work on Final P&S for scour protection.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Corps will push design/environmental process so construction of permanent remedy can begin by January.
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139
-58- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS)/CLARK Date COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Prepared: 1l/19/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99 PROJECT: Flamingo Diversion Channel - Flamingo Diversion Channel: approximately 19,400 I?. of concretelined chamrel, mostly trapezoidal, running from the existing Flamingo Detention Basin to the proposed Tropicana DESCRIPTION: Detention Basin. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 75% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $34.09 million Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $2,1oo,ooo ROW $6,000,000 Construction Management $2,02O,oOo Construction $23,970,000
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 10199 BIDS OPEN: Ol/OO CONSTRUCTION START: 102/00 CONSTRUCTION START: ! ~~~~~1 I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 1 ll/Ol CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I I I - OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I I 1OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I I CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehm - DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Potential conflicts between the flood control channel and existing utilities continue to arise. - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Corps continuedwork on Final Design Memorandum for both phases and completed the draft P&S for PhaseI. Local sponsorsare continuing acquisition of parcels on Phase I, and appraisal of parcels on Phase II. Utility coordination for both reachesof channel continues. CCPW has determined that traffic detours will be required during construction at Jones, Lindell and Decatur Blvds.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - Sponsorswill review the PhaseI draft P&S and provide comments. CCPW will continue design of utility relocations at Rainbow and Dewey. Local sponsors’will continue acquisition on PhaseI and appraisal of parcels for PhaseII. Local sponsorsto continue utility coordination for both phasesof the channel. Corps will continue writing Design - Memorandum.
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 4553139
-J
-59- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (COR.PS)/CLARK Date ‘-\ COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Prepared: 1 l/19/99 - -- -s RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction:
Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 - PROJECT: Lower Blue Diamond Channel DESCRIPTION: Lower Blue Diamond Channel: Reach of the Blue Diamond Channel, approximately 7,526 ft. in length, downstream of the proposedBeltway to the proposed Tropicana - Detention Basin. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $5.4 million - Const: 99% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $300,000 ROW $5 19,570 Construction Management $350,000 Construction $4,223,806 -
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE _ DESIGN: 09197 DESIGN: 09197
BIDS OPEN: 08198 BIDS OPEN: 09198 - CONSTRUCTION START: 09198 CONSTRUCTION START: 1l/98
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 08199 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: - OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehrn
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: The July 8 storm causeddamage, consisting of longitudinal cracking, along approx 800 meters near the upstream end of the channel. Remedial work by Corps contractor hasbegun. Culvert at Sunsetmay need redesignto conform with future SunsetRd. design.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: The main channel concretework was completed,but remedial work due to storm damagecontinues. Asphalt paving for the maintenanceroad and chain link fencing were completed. The galvanized hand rails have been fabricated and installation has begun. All channel concrete work and backfill have been completed.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: The installation of the handrails should be completed and the final inspection conductedfor all contract work.
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. ~ PHONE #: 455-3139 -
-6O- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTR3CT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS)/ CLARK COUNTY/ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL Date DISTRICT Prepared: 1 l/19/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Tropicana Detention Basin DESCRIPTION: A 711 acre ft. detention basin with a 172 sq. mile drainage. The 100-yeardesign flow is 6230 cfs with a discharge outflow rate of 508 cfs. The crest of the dam will serve as the emergency spillway with a capacity of 19,000 cfs. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $15.1 million Const: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $1,36O,OOO ROW $5,637,000 Construction Managen :nt $350,000 Construction S7~845628 I I I I 1SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 05198 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I I OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Army Cores of Engineers. Stuart Brehm - rl DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Corps submitted draft Operating Instructions to sponsor for review. Draft EAP is under review by RFCD.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Corps will continue design of several minor modifications to improve basin performance. PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 4553139
-
-61- ,
I
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT ,- Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 1 l/19/99 CONTROL DISTRICT RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 w PROJECT: Tropicana Outfall Channel DESCRIPTION: Approximately 2400 meters of concrete lined channel, maximum capacity of 1,280 cfs. e With an alignment from the Tropicana Detention Basin to I-15 just south of Tropicana Avenue. - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $7.2 million Const: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA --- Design $561,000 ROW $1,249,300 Construction $250,000 Construction Management $5156,801 -
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE I DESIGN: 07198 DESIGN: 07198 BIDS OPEN: 09198 BIDS OPEN: 09198 -- CONSTRUCTION START: 09198 CONSTRUCTION START: 1l/98 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 10/99 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: - OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehm DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None 3 WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: 4 All channel work, including backfill, has been completed. Contractor completed grading and placement of access/maintenanceroads, and fences. A misaligned portion of the channel located beneaththe HaciendaBridge has been removed and replaced. Final inspection for the entire contract, with the exception of cable hand rail II system, will be held on 19 November. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Install cable hand rail system. - J[
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139 -
-62- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS)/CLARK Date COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Prepared: 1l/19/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 11/01/99 To: 1 l/30/99 PROJECT: Blue Diamond Detention Basin DESCRIPTION: A 2,280 acre ft. detention basin with a total drainage area of 68 square miles. The lOO- year design flow id 13,800 cfs with a discharge outflow rate of 214 cfs. The emergency spillway will have the capacity to handle 145,000 cfs. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $26.02 million Const: 2% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $1,43O,ooo ROW $2,800,000 Construction Management $1,390,000 Construction $8,300,000 - SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 05199 DESIGN: 07199 - BIDS OPEN: 07199 BIDS OPEN: 8/99 CONSTRUCTION START: 08199 CONSTRUCTION START: g/99 -d CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: ll/oo CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): ’ - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehm
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Off-road recreationist have been destroying portions of the tortoise fence.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Contractor began clearing and grubbing operationsfor embankmentfoundation and have erectedthe tortoise fence. Contractor beganinstallation of water line for construction water. The contract was modified to allow time lapse photography of the dam construction. WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Contractor to complete water line, and continue excavation for the embankmentfoundation.
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139
-63- - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT f-l Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date - (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 1l/19/99 CONTROL DISTRICT - RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Lower Red Rock Complex DESCRIPTION: Portions of three separatechannels: Red Rock Channel, F-l/F-2 Channel, and F-4 Channel, that are located downstream (east) of the proposed Beltway and terminate in the - Flamingo Detention Basin. The total length of the three channels is 5,500 ft. Included in the project are two channel confluencesand bridges for Russell Road and Durango Road. Design flows range from 5,400 cfs to 9,600 cfs. - PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $6.29 million Const: 1% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA - Design $525,000 ROW $2,000,000 Construction Manas:ement $265.000 Construction $10.000.00 - - ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE 1DESIGN: 102/99 /J--
I CONSTRUCTION START: I 04199 I ICONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I 03100 I OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U. S. Armv Corns of Engineers. Stuart Brehm
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Contractor completed clearing and grubbing, and has received approval from CCPW for the traffic control plan (detour) at Durango.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Contractor will set up a concrete batch plant on-site, and we plan to hold a partnering conference in early December. PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139
,-
-64- -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT L, Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 1 l/19/99 CONTROL DISTRICT
RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99
- PROJECT: Blue Diamond Channel - Beltway Section 7A DESCRIPTION: Reach of concrete-lined channel along the south side of the Beltway from Rainbow. Blvd. to Road to Lindell Drive (approximately 9,250 feet in length.) Peak loo-year design flows range from 2500 to 4600 cfs. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: 14.8 million Const: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $NA Design $1,6OO,ooO ROW $2,000,000 Construction Management $l,ooO,OOO Construction $10,211,769 SCHEDULED COMPLETION ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DATE DESIGN: 07197 DESIGN: 12197 -- BIDS OPEN: 11/97 BIDS OPEN: 12/97 CONSTRUCTION START: 1 l/97 CONSTRUCTION START: 2198 _- CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 10198 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 12198 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Contractor (D. H. Blattner) completedfinal work 18 December 1998 . Final payment was resolvedand paid. User requestedchanges to double the number of accessladders, coordinate accesswith the County east of JonesRoad, add two water depth indicators and the addition of fence gates have been approved by Corps. Design of these modifications is complete and has been reviewed and approval by local sponsors.
- WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
User requestedchanges must be constructed. -
4
- PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139 -65-
1 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT -
Entity: U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS)/CLARK Date -.. COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Prepared: 11/19/. _ RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: CLAl8A98 Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99 _ PROJECT: Red Rock Channel Reach 8 & 9 DESCRIPTION: Two sectionsof the Red Rock Channel. Concrete lined channel sections running from SunsetRoad to Tropicana Avenue (Section 8) and Tropicana Avenue to Hualpai - (Section 9). These channel sections are being built in conjunction with the County’s Beltway Project. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $23,140,000 - Const: 80% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA A- Design $3,046,000 ROW $
-
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Clark County Public Works, Harold Elliott
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None ] WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Contractor focusedmainly on constructingdrainage facilities in Sections 8 and 9, and Ft. Apache bridge in Section 9. Section 8: Completed “F-1’ CM RCB walls and top deck (Sta. 14+00 to 12+46) also channel walls (Sta. 12+46 to 11+41); Completed Red Rock CM RRC concretewalls and backfill (Sta. 8+65 to 45 +45), and Red Rock CM RCB concrete walls and top deck (Sta. 45 +45 to 52 +90). Section 9: Completed Red Rock Chnl RRC concreteinvert between PeaceWay and Flamingo; Completed Red Rock CM RRC concrete walls (Sta. 99+00 to 105+50). Backfilled previous work on Red Rock CM (Sta 63+00 to 80+00). Completed Ft. Apache Lateral concrete invert (&a. 11+05 to 14+00), and Naples Lateral concrete invert (Sta. 94+75 to 97+40). Complete excavation of Hualapai Lateral (Sta. 21+45 to 27+00).
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Embankment preparation and undergroundutility work will continue on Section 8 and Ft. Apache Bridge preparationwill continue for Section 9 and excavationand concreteplacement for the Red Rock Channel will continue. -\1 PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 4553139 -, -66- - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
- Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 1 l/19/99 L- CONTROL DISTRICT
- RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: CLA 17A98 Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99 - PROJECT: Blue Diamond Channel - Beltway Section 7B DESCRIPTION: Reach of concrete-linedchannel along the south side of the Beltway from Rainbow Road to .- Durango (approximately 6,500 feet in length.) Peak lOO-yeardesign flows range from 2500 to 4600 cfs. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8.9 million Const: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $1,242,000 ROW $1,015,ooo - Construction Management $450,000 Construction $6,211,000 SCHEDULED COMPLETION ACTUAL COMPLETION - DATE DATE DESIGN: 8198 DESIGN: 7198
- BIDS OPEN: 8198 BIDS OPEN: 8198 CONSTRUCTION START: 9198 CONSTRUCTION START: 1 l/98
-- CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: Ol/OO CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Clark County Public Works, Harold Elliott
\L- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Contractor missed completion of the Segment 7B milestone by approx. 51 days and was assessed$380K in liquidated damages. RCB for CH2 (Sta. 271+44) apparently does not meet contract specificationsand has been found deficient. Corps has informally statedthat this work is not acceptable
, for reimbursement. Crops expect to send a formal letter to CCPW by the end of November. i WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: None , i WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: None
I L PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139
d
-67- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 11/19/99 - CONTROL DISTRICT RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/01/99 - PROJECT: Red Rock Reach- Section 1OA DESCRIPTION: Reach of concrete-lined channel along the west side of the Beltway from Hualpai Way to - SaharaAve. (approximately~13,000 feet in length.) Peak loo-year design flows range from 2500 to 4600 cfs. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $12.9 million Const: 2% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA Design $1,242,000 ROW $1,015,000 - Construction Management $450,000 Construction $8,500,000 b - SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: 04/99 DESIGN: 5199 BIDS OPEN: 0999 BIDS OPEN: 8199 - 07199 CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: - CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 10100 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Stuart Brehm
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Contractor cleared and grubbed the downstream portion of Town Center Drive, and has begun excavation at Hualapai, heading upstream. Subgradepreparation of the Hualapai RCB extension has begun. -
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: The channel project will proceed simultaneously with construction of the Section 10A roadway project.- I Coordination will be required to prevent conflict between the two contracts. I
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139
-68- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT Entity: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Date (CORPS)/CLARK COUNTY/REGIONAL FLOOD Prepared: 1l/19/99 CONTROL DISTRICT L’
RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction:
Review Period From: 1l/01/99 11/30/99 PROJECT: R4 Debris Basin and Channel The R-4 Debris Basin is designed to capture sediment from the upstream watershed DESCRIPTION: before it can enter the R-4 Channel. The R-4 Channel consists of a 2.6-kilometer reinforced concrete channel that will connect the R-4 Debris Basin to the Red Rock Channel near the future Las Vegas Beltway. The channel will be constructed of reinforced concrete and will include trapezoidal, rectangular, box, and transitional sections.
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: 60 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $10,359,660
Const: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA
Design: $1,068,000 ROW $713,768 - Construction Management: $391,660 Construction $8,900,000
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE I -- I DESIGN: l/O0 DESIGN: BIDS OPEN: 6/OO BIDS OPEN: - CONSTRUCTION START: lO/oo CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: 4102 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR):
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: U.S. An-m Cores of Engineers. Stuart Brehm - DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Design will be delayed approximately two months to incorporatesignificant increasesin basin size. Basin was enlargedto accommodateaccumulation of sedimentfrom severalsmaller flood - eventswithout the needto remove material immediately after eachevent. An additional Environmental Assessment may be required to secureadditional BLM lands for a Maintenance Disposal Area.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: Corps, local sponsors,and HHP have agreedon R-4 channel alignment and road. Corps A/E have begun incorporating comments into Final Design Memorandum. Coordination meeting among Corps, RFCD, CCPW and Howard Hughes Corp was held November 16, 1999. Severalissues regarding road width and location, accessramps, road crossingsand construction coordinationwere discussedand resolved.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - Corps will continue to prepare final DM with completion date expectedin December 1999. Coordination with -c/l G.C. Wallace and HHP will continue to resolve issue pertaining to storm water confluence points, maintenance accessroads and Loop Road crossings.
PROJECT MANAGER: STEPHEN ROBERTS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139 -69- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - PROJECT STATUS REPORT -< - Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 1 l/18/99
RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99 PROJECT: Pittman Wash Area Flood Insurance Study DESCRIPTION: Flood InsuranceRate Map preparation for the Pittman Wash Study Area north of Lake Mead Drive, east of Eastern Avenue, and upstream of the confluence with the Duck Creek. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: NA ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $132,000 FIS: 98% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA -
Design $ ROW $ - Construction Management $ Construction $
- SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE
DESIGN: DESIGN: ,-- BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE:
OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): FIS - 07/98 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: NIMBUS ENGINEERS/MONTGOMERY WATSON
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
No further delay sincethe completionof the aerial work for topographicmapping.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Additional data submitted in March 1999. FEMA acknowledgereceipt of additional data by letter dated 3/22/99. Additional data requestedby letter dated April 29, 1999. Contract negotiatedwith Montgomery Watson to prepare additional data. Additional data submitted.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONT&
Submit additional data. Wait for FEMA review.
PROJECT MANAGER: KEVIN L. EUBANKS, PHONE #: 455-3 139 - file: P:\donebox\agendas\l20999pithpsr.wpd -7o- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 11/18/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: City of Mesquite Flood Insurance Restudy DESCRIPTION: A restudy of Flood Insurance Study for the Abbott and Pulsipher Washes. The restudy - will be submitted to FEMA with a requestto amend the Flood InsuranceRate Maps accordingly. PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: NA ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $143,000 - FIS: 98% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA
Design $ ROW $ - Construction Management $ Construction $
I SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE I ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE DESIGN: DESIGN: - BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: --’ CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): FIS - 7/98 1 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): - I CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. Wallace, Noel Laughlin
- IIDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Additional data submitted October 6, 1999. FEMA acknowledgedreceipt of data by letter dated October
IIWORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: II Wait for FEMA review.
r- PROJECTMANAGER: KEVIN L. EUBANKS, P. E. PHONE #: 445-3139
4 ftie: P:\donebox\120!%3MESQFISPSR.w-pd -71-
P REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ‘PROJECT STATUS REPORT e Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 1l/18/99 RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 1l/30/99 _ PROJECT: Ranch0 and US95 FIS DESCRIPTION: Flood InsuranceRate Map Preparation for Ranch0 and US95 from Ann Road to Gowan. -
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: NA ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $175,000 -- FIS: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA - Design $ ROW $ Construction Management $ Construction $
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE - DESIGN: DESIGN: I BIDS OPEN: I I BIDS OPEN: A.- CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: I 1 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): 1 FIS - lo/98 1 1 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): I
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PBS&J -
IIDELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: - No quorum for August 14, Board meeting. - WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
LOMR received.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: - Project completed. -
PROJECTMANAGER: KEVIN L. EUBANKS PHONE #: 455-3139 P file: P:\donebox\AGENDAS\120999Rancho95FIS.PSRAUG.wpd -72- - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ‘PROJECT STATUS REPORT
- Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 1 l/18/99 u RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: - Review Period From: 1l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 PROJECT: Hydraulic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual Review DESCRIPTION: Review and update as necessary.
- PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: NA ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $165,000 - Manual: 100% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA
Design $ ROW $ Construction Management $ Construction $
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE 1 DESIGN: DESIGN: - BIDS OPEN: BIDS OPEN: CONSTRUCTION START: I CONSTRUCTION START: -2-J CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE: OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): Manual - lo/98 OTHER (DEFINE I.E., LOMR): - CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Montgomery Watson, John Clark
- DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
- None.
- WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: ASCE seminar presentedchanges to manual. Adopted by the Board on August 12, 1999.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Project completed.
PROJECT MANAGER: KEVIN L. EUBANKS, P. E. PHONE #: 455-3139 d NC: P:\doneboe\agendas\l20999HC&DDMRevu.w-pd -73- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ‘t PROJECT STATUS REPORT I? Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 11/18/99 - RFCD Project Number Design: RFCD Project Number Construction: Review Period From: 1 l/01/99 To: 11/30/99 I PROJECT: BunkervillelMesquite Master Plan Update DESCRIPTION: A Master Plan Update
PERCENT COMPLETE: Design: NA ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: TBD - FIS: 0% INTERLOCAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: $ NA - Design $ ROW $ Construction Management $ Construction $ -
-
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: To be determined -
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Requestfor proposal issued October 15, 1999. Proposalsreceived October 29, 1999.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: Review proposals, select consultant, negotiatecontract.
PROJECTMANAGER: KEVIN L. EUBANKS, P. E. PHONE #: 4453139 - fde: P:\donebox\agendas\1209bumnesqmpu.wpd
-74- -. 1q-1S-S9;10:32AM;The MerICe Agency ;702 386 9231 f: z/ 2
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT i, Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: November 18.1999
Review Period From: October 27. 1999 TO: November 18.1999
PROJECT: 1999 Flood Awareness and Safetv Proaram
DESCRIPTION: ImDlement a flood awareness and safety groaram to inform the wblic reaardina fhe dangers of floodina. - PERCENT COMPLETE: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $700.000 @OnSUltantl
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) The term of the consultant contract is a one year period from 2/3/9Q,
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: The Merica AaencyNoe 1 A DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
l No delays or problem areas.
1 -.-/ WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT M3NTl-l: *Agency submitted 2000 flood awareness campaign/plan to client for review/approval.
- 2 WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
- *Agency to submit and present 2000 flood awareness campaign/plan to the CAC for approval. *Once approved by the CAC, agency to present plan to the Board of Directors-
- 3
-
- PROJECT MANAGER: Gale Fraser Phone #: 455-3139 -75- -
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS AND INTERVIEWS -~ NOVEMBER 1999 -
District staff distributed600 brochuresentitled “FlashFloods: Hidden Dangersof the Desert” to Realtors,Insurance Agents and citizens. -
On November 10, 1999,Kevin Eubanksaddressed 145 adults at the ASCE seminarregarding changesto the Hydrologic Criteria DrainageDesign Manual. -
On November 16, 1999,Tim Sutko and Jill Reilly gave a presentationto the SalvationArmy regardingthe dangersof flooding. -
-
-
-
-
-76- CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: - FINANCIAL REPORTS - OCTOBER 1999
-
- RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Accept the reports.
- TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Accept the reports.
- CITIZENS ADVISORY: Accept the reports.
- -’
-
-
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #04 DATE: 12/09/99 -
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT .J- AGENDA ITEM - , SUBJECT: - FINANCIAL REPORTS - OCTOBER 1999
PETITIONER: - GALE WM. FRASER. II. P.E.. GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: -
THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS - FISCAL IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND: The following Financial Reports for the month of October 1999, are submitted for your review: -
Section Description Page(s) A - Fund 286 Fund Balance Report ...... 1 - Sales Tax Revenue Report ...... 2 ILA Approved Report ...... 3 Monthly Expenditure Summary Report ...... 4 - B - Fund 287 Fund Balance Report...... 5 MaintenanceWork Program Status Report (FY 1999/00)...... 6-8 MaintenanceWork Program Monthly Expenditures...... N/A - C - Fund 330 Fund Balance Report...... 9 D - Fund 443 Fund Balance Report...... 10 ILA Approved Report ...... 11 - Monthly Expenditure Report ...... 12-13 Current Project Expense Summary ...... 14-38 CIP - Cumulative Reporting ...... 39-42 -- FY1999/00 Project List - Funding RequestSummary...... 4344 Funding RequestsReport (FY 1999/00) ...... 45 E-Fund444 Fund Balance Report ...... 46 - Monthly Expenditure Report ...... 47 1998 Bond List ...... 48-50 Current Project ExpenseSummary ...... 51-58 - CIP - Cumulative Reporting ...... 59-60
Respectfully submitted, -
-
Administrative Services Director
p:\wpinbox\AGENDAS\111899TAC AGENDAS\120!B9fml.itm REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DlSTRlCT FUND 288 - FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1999 - BEGINNING FUND BALANCE c Unused Tax Revenues 12,801,599.50 TOTAL BALANCE $12.801,599.50 REVENUES: Sales Tax - October 1999 4,132,113.79 interest Earnings 47.393.16 - Interest Earnings Transferred from Fund 443 0.00 Real Property Tax Receivable - Delinquent 0.04 Sale of Materials 310.00 Miscellaneous Other Revenue 0.00 - TOTAL REVENUES $4,179,816.99 EXPENDITURES: Salaries & Benefits (119.262.13) - Supplies & Services (19.27134) Professional Services (124.033.60) Capital Expenditures . (5256.20) Prior Period Accrual/Adjustment 478.525.09 - Transferred to Fund 330 (1,647,050&I) Transfer (to)/from Fund 443 (2,544,029.45) TOTAL EXPENSES ($3,980,378.47)
ENDING CASH BALANCE (FUND 286) $13,001,038.02
OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: - P.O. Balances - Prof. Services and Operating Costs (1,292,835.25) 286 Contracts Awarded - Funds not yet encumbered 0.00 Corps of Engineers Project (5,833,OOO.OO) - u Corps of Engineers Project - Payable 0.00 Funds not yet transferred to Fund 330 - 1991 Bonds 0.00 Funds not yet transferred to Fund 330 - 1998 Bonds 0.00 Funds not yet transferred to Fund 443 (3,247,333.00) - Accounts Payable (88,075.15)
TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS ($10,461,243.40) - FUNDS AVAilABLE FOR COMMITMENT $2,539,794.62
CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS PROJECT FISCAL NUMBER SCOPE IMPACT
TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDS $0.00 - TOTAL RESERVE FOR CIP $2,539,794.62
1 l/s/99 4Pd SALES TAX REVENUE REPORT ,- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 199912000 CASH BASIS
MONTH SALES l/4 CENT SALES SALES TAX TAX RECEIVED TAX ESTIMATE REVENUES I
JULY 3,943,311.52 4,141,389.16 198,077X4 5.0% 4,141,389.16
AUGUST 4,148,358.38 4,604,598.55 456,240.18 11.0% 8,745,987.71
SEPTEMBER 3,878,99i.68 3,949,285.15 70,290.47 1.8% 12,695,272.86 -
OCTOBER 3,889,677.49 4,132,113.79 242,436.30 6.2% 16,827,386.65 - NOVEMBER 4,201,364.00
DECEMBER 4,231,514.27 - JANUARY 4,340,426.78
FEBRUARY 4,863,845.71
MARCH 3,738,001.22
APRIL 3,841,697.43 -
MAY 4,503,377.96
JUNE 4,133,034.38
TOTAL: $ 49,713,603.82 $ 16,827,386.65 $ 967,044.59 6.1% $ 16,827,386.65 -
11/a/1999 43 2 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED L FUND 286 - OCTOBER 1999
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD FISCAL NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE SCOPE IMPACT -1--__------w-m-- -_-_------_---______I-- --I------_I_ -
ILA’S APPROVED-FUNDS TRANSFERRED/RETURNED
- MWP-99 9 10/14/99 FY 98-99 Maintenance Work Program Closeout 1,564,970.55 NLVI OB99 18 10/14/99 Cheyenne Peaking Basin - ROW Engineering/Acquisition (3,974,000.00) BOU06A99 20 10/14/99 Ville Drive Flood Control Improvements - Design (50,000.00) HEN12A99 25 1 O/14/99 Gibson Channel at Sunset Road - Design (105,000.00)
TRANSFERS (TO)! FROM FUND 443 TOTAL (2,544,029.45) -_ ILA’S APPROVED-FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERRED/RETURNED
IAS 17A98 12 1 l/10/99 Las Vegas Wash Ranch0 Drive System - Peak to Lake Mead (45,000.00) LAS01 B95 13 1 l/l 0199 Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion (729,500.OO) LAS1 OL99 22B 1 l/l O/99 Gowan North System Buffalo Branch (185,903.OO) IA.3 6C99 23C 1 l/10/99 Ranch0 Road System - Centenial to Ranch0 Detention Basin (30,000.00) LAS1 6899 23D 1 l/10/99 Ranch0 Road System - Centenial to Ranch0 Detention Basin (1,956,930.00) NLVl 1 A97 14 1 l/10/99 Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash - Camino Al Notte to A (500.000.00) CLA14A97 18 1 l/10/99 Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie (Reduction in Funding) 200.000.00 - TO BE TRANSFERED (TO) I FROM FUND 443 TOTAL (3,247,333.00)
- FUND 286 CONTRACTS AWARDED AND NOT YET ENCUMBERED/EXPENDED
TO BE ENCUMBERED/EXPENDED FROM FUND 286 TOTAL 0.00 -
-
-
-
1 l/8/1999 WJ /
\ Schedule of Monthly Expenditures - Summary Fund 286
October
Account # Account Name Amount 5000 Salaries and Wages 91,241.45 6000 Employee Benefits 28,020.68 7010 Oftice Supplies 3,536.Ol 7060 Small Equipment 4,200.15 7110 Vehicle Maintenance and Operation 589.29 7120 Rental of Equipment, Land and Buildings 2,260.47 7130 Information Systems Services 361.69 7140 Telephone Expenditures 1,013.07 7210 Professional Services 123,033.60 7212 Professional Services - Legal 1 ,ooo.oo 7230 Facilities Maintenance 100.00 7240 Equipment Maintenance 860.91 7250 Postage 158.75 7260 Conventions, Seminars and Lectures 449.00 7270 Travel and Transportation 940.48 7280 Printing and Advertisements 327.57 7310 Dues, Subscriptions and Publications 4,473.95 8020 Capital Expenditures - Building 3,688.63 - 8040 Capital Expenditures - Equipment 1,567.57 $267,823.27 ----
-
-
1110811999 4 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 287 -FUND BALANCE REPORT u OCTOBER 1999
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $0.00
REVENUES: - Interest Income 14,074.93 Transfer Appropriations from Fund 443 for MWP 5,049,863.00 Accrued Interest 0.00 - TOTAL MONTHLY REVENUES !§5,063,937.93
EXPENDITURES: Professional Services (227.50) Maintenance Work Program Expenditures 0.00 Prior Period Accrual/Adjustment (42,273.34)
TOTAL MONTHLY EXPENSES ($42,500&I)
ENDING CASH BALANCE (FUND 287) $5,021,437.09 - d
- OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: Purchase Order Balances (1,969,340.39) Accounts Payable (99,710.49) - Unencumbered Approved Maintenance Funds (2,938,539.61)
TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS ($5,007,590.49)
UNOBLIGATED FUNDS (FUND 287) $13,846.60
.-
5 Regional Flood Control District Maintenance Work Program Status Report 2000 Boulder Citv ,Y--. Amount Amc Facilitv Name Budqet sJ& Remainha - BCOI Hemenway Wash 449,000 0 449,000 BC02 Airport Channel 66,000 0 66,000 BC03 Georgia Channel 12,000 0 12,000 BC04 Buchannan Channel 17,000 0 17,000 - BC05 Bootleg Canyon 29,000 0 29,000 BC06 Gingerwood Wash 16,000 0 16,000 BC07 Cemetery Wash 7,000 0 7,000 -
$596,000 $0 $596,000 - Clark County
Amount _ Facility Name Budslet Am& Remaininq CC01 Flamingo Wash 329,500 1,200 328,300 CC02 Las Vegas Wash 631,900 32,949 598,950 CC03 Duck Creek 586,500 5,850 580,650 - CC05 LV Range Wash 328,000 1,300 326,700 CC06 Tropicana Wash 36,300 0 36,300 CC07 Airport Channel 18,500 200 18,300 - CC08 Monson Channel 30,500 200 30,300 CC09 Rawhide Channel 39,500 200 39,300 CC1 0 Van Buskirk Channel 16,200 200 16,00< CC1 1 Flamingo Wash North Fork 22,200 0 22,2 CC14 Laughlin Washes 19,000 0 19,oou CC1 5 Moapa Valley 17,000 0 17,000 CC1 6 Blue Diamond Wash 3,500 0 3,500 - CC1 7 Searchlight 1,000 0 1,000 CC1 8 Bunkerville 5,000 0 5,000 CC1 9 Pittman 4,500 0 4,500 --
$2,089,100 $42,099 $2,047,000
Henderson
Amount Facility Name Budqet Remaining - HNOl C-l Channel 29,416 19,121 10,294 HN02 Greenway 10,528 1,697 8,830 HN03 Van Wagenen 5,911 280 5,630 - HN04 Gibson 3,965 0 3,965 HN05 Lower Pittman 32,744 8,376 24,367 HN06 Upper Pittman Wash 349,833 929 348,903 _ HN07 UPRR 5,062 0 5,062 HN08 Sandwedge 263,294 532 262,761 HN09 Whitney Ranch 6,855 0 6,855 HNI 0 Duck Creek 33,273 41,046 -7,773 - HNI 1 Mission Hills Det Basin 17,354 0 17,35- HN12 Railroad East Channel 9,837 0 9,81 HN13 McDonald Ranch Channel 5,476 0 5,476 - HN14 Drake Channel 6,881 0 6,881 HNl5 l-515 Channel 1,889 0 1,889 HN16 Eastern Channel 6,717 0 6,717 -
1 l/08/1 999 6 Regional Flood Control District - Maintenance Work Program Status Report 2000 Henderson
r^ Amount L‘J Facilitv Name Budqet Amg Remaining HN17 Western Interceptor 7,061 0 7,061 HNI 8 Equestrian Detention Basin 20,985 0 20,985 HN19 Sunridge Channel 224 0 224 HN20 Pittman Wash Railroad Channel 9,443 0 9,443 HN21 C-l Channel/Boulder Hwy. 8,811 0 8,811 - HN22 Pittman Wash Bums Channel 2,541 0 2,541 HN23 Pittman Wash Black Mountain 2,857 0 2,857 HN24 Pittman Pecos Channel 6,023 0 6,023 - $846,980 $71,985 $774,995
- Las Vegas
Amount Facilitv Name Budget Am& Remaining - LV51 Cedar Ave ChannelINellis System 600,000 0 600,000 LV52 GowanIAngel PWLone Mtn System 300,000 0 300,000 LV53 Lake Mead/Smoke Ranch System 20,000 0 20,000 LV54 Las Vegas Wash System 290,600 0 290,600 LV55 MeadowslOakey System 1,000 0 1,000 LV56 Washington AvelLV Creek System 1,000 0 1,000 - $1,212,600 $0 $1,212,600
Mesquite - - Amount Amount Facilitv Name Budnet Spent Remaining ME01 Mesquite Town Wash 15,000 7,465 7,534 -- ME02 Abbott Wash Channel 35,000 7,213 27,786 ME03 Mesquite Blvd Bridge 1,000 0 1,000 ME04 Town Wash Det Basin 20,000 1,537 18,462 ME05 Mesquite Blvd Storm Sewer 1,000 0 1,000 ME06 Hillside Storm Drain 1,000 0 1,000 ME07 Pulsipher Wash 4,000 3,075 924
$77,000 $19,291 - $57,708
North Las Vegas
Amount Facility Name Budclet Am&t Remaining NLOI LV Wash North Reach 8,680 0 8,680 NL02 Las Vegas Wash-Middle 107,789 1,327 106,461 NL03 LV Wash-King Charles Channel 5,535 0 5,535 - NL04 LV Range Wash West Branch 7,160 0 7,160 NL05 No LV Detention Basin 17,575 7,280 10,294 NL06 Upper Wash Det Basin 18,635 0 18,635 NL07 Carey AveMl Lake Mead Det Basin 15,805 0 15,805 NL08 Gowan Outfall Channel 10,380 0 10,380 L-J NL09 Kyle Canyon Det Basin 14,805 0 14,805 NLI 0 Upper Las Vegas Wash 1,595 0 1,595 NLI 1 Clayton Street Channel 1,800 0 1,800 NL12 Lower Las Vegas Det. Basin 15,805 0 15.805 11/08/1999 7 - Regional Flood Control District Maintenance Work Program Status Report 2000 North Las Vegas
Amount Amo Facility Name Budaet SPent Remaimr,, “i NL13 Western Trib-Ann to Lower LV Basin 1,310 0 1,310 NL14 Vandenberg Detention Basin 1,310 0 1,310
$228,184 $8,607 $219,576 -
Amount Amount Bucket Spent Remaining _ Program Totals $5,049,864 $141,983 $4,907,880
-
11 lO8ll999 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 330 - FUND BALANCE REPORT L-H OCTOBER 1999
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $14,889,469.69
- REVENUES: Interest Income 53,179.oo Transfers In 1,647,050.84 Accrued Interest 0.00 Proceeds from Bonds & Loans 0.00
- TOTAL MONTHLY REVENUES $1,700,229.84
-_- EXPENDITURES/ACCRUALS: Professional Services (1,359.55) Debt Service Payment 0.00 Prior Period Accrual/Adjustment 0.00
TOTAL MONTHLY EXPENSES ($1.35955)
ENDING CASH BALANCE (FUND 330) $16,588,339.98
-
-
- 11/8/1999 /jpd REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 - FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1999
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE: Cash in Custody of Treasurer 50,867,568.53 Escrow Cash Balance 3,880,016.66 -
TOTAL BEGINNING CASH $54,747,585.19
REVENUES: Fund 286 / ILA’s Transfer In/(Out) 2,544,029.45 Fund 286 I Transfer In - Escrow 0.00 Escrow Interest 57492.84 Interest Earnings 158540.80 - Other 0.00
TOTAL MONTHLY REVENUES $2,708,063.09 -
EXPENDITURES: 9999 - Capital Improvement Program (967,385.42) - 9999 - Escrow Account Draw 0.00 3550 - Professional Services (2.761.07) 3560 - Maintenance Work Program Adjustment 42,273.34 9990 - Transfer Interest Earnings to Fund 286 0.00 - 9990 - Transfer Appropriations to Fund 287 for MWP (5,049,863.00) Prior Period Accrual/Adjustment (475617.66)
TOTAL MONTHLY EXPENSES ($6,453,353.81) --
ENDING CASH BALANCE: Cash in Custody of Treasurer 47,116,610.32 Escrow Cash Balance 3,885,684.15 -
TOTAL ENDING CASH BALANCE (FUND 443) $51,002,294.47
COMMITTED IMPACTS TO FUND BALANCE: Accounts Payable - Capital Improvement Program (269,516.81) Accounts Payable - Maintenance Work Program 0.00 Escrow Account Obligation (3,695,OOO.OO) Unrealized Interest (190,684.15)
TOTAL COMMITMENTS ($4,155,200.96)
FUND BALANCE (FUND 443) $46.847.093.51 -
10 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED FUND 443 - OCTOBER 1999
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD FISCAL NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE SCOPE IMPACT -~-_--_------1-1- -1-11---- l_------___---_-___------~---- ILA’S APPROVED-FUNDS TRANSFERRED/RETURNED
MWP-99 9 10/14/99 FY 98-99 Maintenance Work Program Closeout (1,584,970.55) NLVI OB99 18 10/14/99 Cheyenne Peaking Basin - ROW Engineering/Acquisition 3,974,ooo.oo BOUO6A99 20 10114/99 Ville Drive Flood Control Improvements - Design 50,000.00 HEN12A99 25 10114/99 Gibson Channel at Sunset Road - Design 105,000.00
TRANSFERS (TO) / FROM FUND 286 TOTAL 2,544,029.45
ILA’S APPROVED-FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERRED/RETURNED
IAS 17A98 12 1 l/10/99 Las Vegas Wash Ranch0 Drive System - Peak to Lake Mead 45,ooo.oo LAS01 895 13 1 l/l O/99 Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion 729,500.oo IASI OL99 22B 1 l/10/99 Gowan North System Buffalo Branch 185,903.OO LAS1 6C99 23C 1111 O/99 Ranch0 Road System - Centenial to Ranch0 Detention Basin 30,000.00 LAS16B99 23D 1 l/10/99 Ranch0 Road System - Centenial to Ranch0 Detention Basin 1,956,930.00 NLVl IA97 14 II/IO/99 Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash - Camino Al Norte to Ann 500,000.00 CLA14A97 18 1 l/10/99 Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie (Reduction in Funding) (200,000.00)
TO BE TRANSFERED (TO) I FROM FUND 286 TOTAL 3,247,333.00
-
-
-
11/8/1999 W 11 Regional Flood Control District Monthly Expenditures Fund 443 PO Invoice Invoice Proiect Number Vendor Number Date Amos LAUO3A96 126778 01 A-N West inc., Consulting 7323-04-09 09/l 011999 2,513.70 - HEN05A92 140819 01 Appraisal Sciences, Ltd. 5034.UPD 09/20/1999 1,500.00 COEG294 128406 02 Baker & Hostetler, LLP 618347 09/27/l 999 5,390.67 INV EXP INVEXP CC Treasurer 00 04 1013111999 2,761.07 - tAUO3A96 126088 01 CH2M Hill, Inc. 3181837 08/27/l 999 63,142.40 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of Las Vegas AR 400286 09/I 7/I 999 510.96 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/l 999 48.80 - lASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/l 6/l 999 432.08 lASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/I 6/l 999 486.09 LASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/I 6/l 999 378.07 tASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/l 6/l 999 2,021.37 - lASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/I 6/l 999 432.08 LASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/l 6/l 999 379.75 - LASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/I 6/l 999 3,600.OO - lASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/I 6/l 999 188,210.OO lASO9F93 55252 01 City of Las Vegas 24511 08/l 6/l 999 1,450.oo iASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/l 6/l 999 -201.20 _ LASO9J97 113736 01 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/16/l 999 -100.11 LASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/16/l 999 -101.06 LASO9J97 11373601 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/l 6/l 999 -52.71 tASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/I 6/l 999 4.143.30 - tASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/l 6/l 999 3,303.16 LASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/I 6/l 999 3,296.72 LASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/I 6/l 999 2,055 ,--- - lASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/l 6/l 999 2,797. lASO9J97 113736 03 City of Las Vegas 24507 08/I 6/l 999 2,204.39 IASI 5A95 80131 05 City of Las Vegas 24481 08/I 4/l 999 1,079.96 _ LAS1 5A95 80131 05 City of Las Vegas 24481 08/14/l 999 341.04 LAS 15A95 80131 05 City of Las Vegas 24481 08/14/l 999 520.36 IA.3 5A95 80131 05 City of Las Vegas 24481 08/I 4/l 999 72,439.29 LAS 15A95 80131 05 City of Las Vegas 24481 08/14/l 999 18,742.69 - NLV08B97 109211 02 City of North Las Vegas AR 400028 07/l 6/l 999 232.26 NLVI IA97 109488 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400281 09/I 7/l 999 482.58 NLVI IA97 109488 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400285 09/l 7/l 999 1,080.20 - NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/l 999 9,653.91 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/1999 1,773.28 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/l 999 14.49 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/I 999 533.39 - NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/l 7/l 999 365.16 NLV09A94 74113 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400286 09/I 7/l 999 305.04 NLV08A94 74114 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400264 09/l 6/l 999 596.36 - NLV08A94 74114 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400264 09/l 6/l 999 233.57 NLVI 1897 109489 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400262 09/I 6/l 999 1,738.10 NLVI 1897 109489 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400262 09/l 6/l 999 540.58 _ NLVl 1 B97 109489 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400262 09/16/l 999 1,932.72 NLVI 1897 109489 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400262 09/l 6/l 999 808.41 NLV09A94 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400263 09/I 6/l 999 108.16 NLV09A94 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400263 09/l 6/l 999 109.21 - NLVI IA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/l 6/l 999 162.w. NLVI IA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/l 6/l 999 8,131 NLVl IA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/I 6/l 999 35,934.oa - - NLVI IA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/l 6/l 999 152.57 NLVl lA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/l 6/l 999 233.82 NLVI IA97 none City of North Las Vegas AR 400261 09/l 6/l 999 244.87 _ _
1110811999 12 Regional Flood Control District - Monthly Expenditures Fund 443 PO Invoice Invoice Vendor b Proiect Number Number j&i Amount LAU03A96 126967 01 Contri Construction Co. 07 09/I 011999 364,161&l - LAUO3A96 126967 01 Contri Construction Co. 08 09/30/l 999 52,559.74 HEN05A92 131626 01 Cutler & Stanfield, LLP 09981 09/03/1999 1,492.15 HEN05A92 131626 01 Cutler 8 Stanfield, LLP 10137 1 O/08/1 999 2.228.72 MOAOI B89 96911 02 G.C. Wallace, Inc. 14640 08/20/l 999 IO,21 1.43 - HEN05A92 139088 01 Geotechnical & Environmen 4330 09/0111999 11,531.33 MOAOlB89 126969 01 Jason Associates Corp. 2127 09/08/l 999 2,033.26 NLV08A94 99020 02 Land Title of Nevada 12433601008 09/27/l 999 5750.00 - CLAI 3A97 115859 01 Mercury1L.D. 0. Limited 357961-3 09/30/l 999 6.12 CLAI 3A97 115859 01 MercuryIL.D.0. 355776-3 09/07/l 999 5.71 CIA1 3A97 115859 01 MercuryIL.D.0. 355541-3 09/03/l 999 12.24 CLAO8A92 none Mercury/L.D.O. 355199-3 - 08131 II 999 528.24 cLA12A97 140288 01 MercurylL.D.0. Limited 350523-3 07/08/l 999 168.49 cLA12A97 140288 01 MercurylL.D.0. Limited 351240-3 07/l 6/l 999 46.80 CLAI 3A97 115859 01 MercurylL.D.0. Limited 357556-3 09/27/l 999 15.71 - CIA1 OA97 133561 01 MercurylL.D.0. Limited 355777-3 09/07/l 999 0.61 CLAI OA97 133561 01 MercuryIL.D.0. Limited 355830-3 09/08/l 999 55.87 CIA1 OA97 133561 02 MercuryIL.D.0. Limited 355830-3 09/08/l 999 107.33 -_- COEG294 none Michael K. Mansfield 118H 08/31/l 999 540.13 BUN01 898 125674 01 Montgomery Watson 242997 09/I 5/l 999 156.56 CLAI 6A98 128980 01 Montgomery Watson America 242992 09122l1999 7,636.72 LAUO3A96 none National Flood Insurance 9809099R 10105/l 999 5,ooo.oo -- CIA1 3A97 108618 02 PBS&J 90296 09/20/1999 14,653.29 COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08/31/l 999 600.00 COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08/31/l 999 600.00 4 - COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08131 II 999 600.00 COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08131 I1 999 600.00 COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08/31/l 999 800.00 132861 01 -- COEG294 Property Specialists, Inc 1285 08i3ll1999 200.00 COEG294 132861 01 Property Specialists, Inc 1288 1 o/04/1 999 600.00 COEG294 136193 01 Timothy Morse & Associate 99-l 91 09/13/l 999 1,600.OO NLVl lA97 109486 03 VTN of Nevada 23 09/16/l 999 8,409.21 - NLVI IA97 109486 03 VTN of Nevada 073099 08/06/l 999 8,240.OO COEG294 88124 02 VTN of Nevada 33 02/11/1999 2,659.40 COEG294 88124 02 VTN of Nevada 33 02/i l/1999 186.92 COEG294 88124 02 VTN of Nevada 33 02/l 111999 850.00 COEG294 88124 02 VTN of Nevada 33 02/l 1 II 999 6,265.80 NLVI 1897 110562 03 VTN of Nevada 21 1 OlOBll999 5,064.06 NLVI IA97 109486 03 VTN of Nevada 24 1 O/08/1 999 4,876.OO $970,146.49
13 1110811999 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 Fund 443 - K-Y Boulder City - BOU05A98 North Railroad Watershed Expiration Date 01/01/2000 I nterlocal Amount 100,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 1 oo,ooo.oo
BOU06A99 Ville Drive Flood Control Facilities Expiration Date 01/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 50,000 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other _ 0 0 50,000 0 0 0
I‘-- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 50,000.00 -
-
-
14 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 Clark County
--J BUNOIASO Bunkerville Channel Windmill Wash Expiration Date 07/01/l 999 Interlocal Amount 819,384 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 17,147 0 565,685 0 0 236,551
Amount Spent by Category Design 209,875.86 Design Eng 355,809.14 Other 236,551 .OO ROW 9,603.26 Total Spent on Project 811,839.26 Total Remaining 7,544.74
BUN01 B98 Bunkerville Flood Control Improvements/Cons Expiration Date 07/01/1999 Interlocal Amount 6,554.OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 5,974,ooo 580,000 0
-..-- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 5,168,757.80 Construction Eng 531,637.53 - Total Spent on Project 5,700,395.33 Total Remaining 853,604.67
15 - i Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 CLA02G99 Rawhide Channel at Sagebrush Street Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 500,000 /? Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 427,350 72,650 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 500,000.00
CLA03D91 Van Buskirk System Expiration Date 03/01/1993 - Interlocal Amount 850,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way P&design Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
30,000 0 820,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 788,991.19 ROW 15,600.08 A. Total Spent on Project 804,591.27 Total Remaining 45,408.73 ,--
CLA04E99 Flamingo Wash-McLeod to Maryland Expiration Date 07/01/2003 - Interlocal Amount 500,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 10,000 0 490,000 0 0 0
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 500,000.00
.-
16 Current Project Expense Summary
.- 11/08/1999 CLAO4F99 Flamingo Wash-Bdulder to McLeod Expiration Date 07/01/2004 Interlocal Amount 500,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation u Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 10,000 0 490,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 500,000.00 -
CLA08A92 Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 950,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 300,000 645,891 0 0 4,109
- Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 417,298.60 Other 4,109.oo Predesign 184,826.17 - Total Spent on Project 606,233.77 Total Remaining 343,766.23
-. - CLA09A97 Durango Collector Expiration Date 07/01/1999
- Interlocal Amount 388,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 15,000 0 373,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Design Eng 210,351.15 Total Spent on Project 210,351.15 - Total Remaining 177,648.85
.-
.-
Li
-
17 - Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 CIA1 OA97 Tropicana Wash/Paradise-Koval Expiration Date 07/01/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 240,000 n Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other -~ 10,000 0 220,000 0 0 10,000 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 159,523.58 ROW 231.05 Total Spent on Project 159,754.63 Total Remaining 80,245.37
CLA12A97 Desert Inn Detention Basin & Collection Sys Expiration Date 07/01/2002 _ Interlocal Amount 370,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 5,000 0 365,000 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 232,672.27 Total Spent on Project 232,672.27 ,-- Total Remaining 137,327.73
CLA12B98 Desert Inn Detention Basin & Collection Sy Expiration Date 07/O l/2000 - Interlocal Amount 43,197 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 43,197 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 43,197.oo Total Spent on Project 43,197.oo Total Remaining 0.00
-
18 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 CLA13A97 Lakes Det Basin/Collection Sys/OutfaII Expiration Date 07/01/l 999 Interlocal Amount 450,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 450,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Design Eng 342,941.16 Total Spent on Project 342,941 .I6 Total Remaining 107,058.84
- CL41 3B98 Lakes Det Basin/Co11 Sys/Outfall Phase I Expiration Date 07/01/1999 Interlocal Amount 1,120,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation -- Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 1 ,ooo,ooo 120,000 0 -. Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 718,035.66 - Construction Eng 70,596.08 Total Spent on Project 788,631.74 - d Total Remaining 331,368.26
CLA14A97 Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie _._ Expiration Date 07/01/1999 Interlocal Amount 400,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 400,000 0 0 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 ROW 8lJ582.59 - Total Spent on Project 81,582.59 Total Remaining 318,417.41
19 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/l 999 cLA14c99 Duck Creek Channel-Sunset to Eastern Expiration Date 07/01/2003 - Inter-local Amount 200,000 /-- Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 200,000.00
CLA14D99 Duck Creek Channel-Hollywood to Stephanie Expiration Date 07/01/2002 - Interlocal Amount 900,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 900,000 0 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 - Total Remaining 900,000.00 -- CLA14E99 Duck Creek-Stephanie to Green Valley Parkway Expiration Date 07/01/2Oc Interlocal Amount 488,000 - Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 20,000 0 468,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 488,OOO.OO -
-
-
20 Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 CLAI 6A98 Up Duck (DK), Ctrl DK,Lwr BD & Bird SP DB’s Expiration Date 07/O l/2003 - Interlocal Amount 200,000 b Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 200,000 0 0 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - ROW 80,748.56 ROWE 22,090.98 Total Spent on Project 102,839.54 Total Remaining 97,160.46
CLA19A99 Red Rock Channel-Naples Branch Expiration Date 07/O 112003 Interlocal Amount 400,000 - Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 40,000 0 360,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 400,000.00 - u CLA20A99 Washington Collection System Expiration Date 07/o l/2002 - Interlocal Amount 49,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Desig? Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 49,000 0 0 0
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 49,ooo.oo -
21 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/l 999 COEGI 94 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project Expiration Date 07/o 1/I 997 -. p,’ Interlocal Amount 100,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Amount Spent by Category Other 19,427.06 ROW 26,042.52 - Total Spent on Project 45,469.58 Total Remaining 54,530.42 -
COEG294 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Flood Control Expiration Date 10/02/2001 interlocal Amount 16,500,OOO - lnterlccal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 16,500,OOO 0 0 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category Construction 616,929.36 - Design Eng 560,182.86 Other 2,312.78 ROW 9,237,571.26 - ROWA 4,ooo.oo Total Spent on Project 10,420,996.26 - Total Remaining 6,079,003.74
GSPOlA88 Goodsprings Flood Control Improvements Expiration Date 06/30/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 99,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 39,000 0 40,400 18,600 0 1,000
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 39,209.30 Other 972.00 ROW 8.488.57 Total Spent on Project 48,669.87 - Total Remaining 50,330.13
-. -
22 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/l 999 lNDOlA98 Indian Springs Flood Control Improvements Expiration Date 07/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 100,000 i- Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 100,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 -- Design Eng 9,414.64 Total Spent on Project 9,414.64 Total Remaining 90,585.36
- LAU03A96 Hiko Springs Detention Basin Outiall Channel Expiration Date 07/01/2000 Interlocal Amount 8,375,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 65,000 0 620,000 6,880,OOO 810,000 0
Amount Spent by Category Construction 6,077,386.41 Construction Eng 619,647.50 Design Eng ,472,440.98 ROW 46.910.26 - d Total Spent on Project 7,216,385.15 Total Remaining 1,158,614.85
MOAOI 889 Moapa Valley Muddy River West Levee Expiration Date 01/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 1,850,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 1,490,000 0 330,000 0 0 30,000
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 237,240.75 ROW 271,425.93 Total Spent on Project 508,666.68 - Total Remaining 1,341,333.32
23 3 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999
SEA01 B99 Searchlight Flood Control Improvements Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 7,500 f--Y , Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 7,500 0 0 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 ROWA 5,500.oo - Total Spent on Project 5,500.oo Total Remaining 2,ooo.oo
TROPFLAM Tropicana/Flamingo Washes Project Expiration Date 07/01/2002 Interlocal Amount 2,588,234 _ Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 2,588,234 _ 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category Construction 280,550.OO - Total Spent on Project 280,550.OO Total Remaining 2,307,684.41 -
-
24 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 Henderson
L HEN04A91 C-l Channel System Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - Inter-local Amount 1,050,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 306,020 0 743,979 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 743,979.90 - ROW 248,418.23 Total Spent on Project 992,398.13 - Total Remaining 57,601.87
HEN04E96 Mission Hills Western Interceptor (443) Expiration Date 12/31/1998 Interlocal Amount 3,358,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 2,933,ooo 375,000 50,000 - Amount Spent by Category Construction 2,335,996.50 Construction Eng 291,252.52 - - Other 9,350.oo Total Spent on Project 2,636,599.02 - Total Remaining 721,400.98
HEN04F97 Black Mountain Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000 Interlocal Amount 325,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 100,000 0 225,000 0 0 0
- Amount Spent by Category Construction Eng 303.75 Design Eng 222,865.30 - ROW 47,923.61 Total Spent on Project 271,092.66 Total Remaining 53,907.34
25 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 HEN04198 C-l Channel Culvert @ Lake Mead Drive Expiration Date 12/31/1999 - Interlocal Amount 905,960 .rl Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 865,960 40,000 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 780,070.OO - Total Spent on Project 780,070.OO Total Remaining 125,890.OO -
HEN04K99 C-l Channel-Upper & Middle Reaches Expiration Date 12/31/2000 Interlocal Amount 505,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 5,000 0 500,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 505,000.00 JY
HEN05A92 Pioneer Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 3,749,485 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 3,354,485 0 335,000 0 0 60,000
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 313,117.80 Other 26J26.83 ROW 6,233.53 - Total Spent on Project 345,478.16 Total Remaining 3,404,006.84
26 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 HEN06B95 Equestrian Detention Basin Construction Expiration Date 12/31/2000 Interlocal Amount 6,400,OOO L Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 10,000 5,890,OOO 400,000 100,000
Amount Spent by Category Construction 5,642,418.26 Construction Eng 328,047.Ol Other 96,900.OO Total Spent on Project 6,067,365.27 Total Remaining 332,634.73
HEN07A96 Pittman Park Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/1999 Interlocal Amount - 2,295,ooo Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 150,000 2,145,OOO 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Construction 1,373,468.37 Design Eng 147,781.22 Total Spent on Project 1,521,249.59 - - Total Remaining 773,750.41
- HEN08A96 Railroad East Detention Basin Expiration Date 12131 /I 999 Interlocal Amount 2,200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 1,520,000 180,000 500,000 0 0 0
- Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 263,370.19 PreDesign 172,916.OO ROW 3,167.38 Total Spent on Project 439,453.57 Total Remaining 1,760,546.43
-
27 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 HEN09A99 Pittman Wash Eastern Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - interlocal Amount 132,000 - Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 75,000 0 10,000 0 0 47,000 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 4,996.72 Other 46,960.OO - ROW 259.46 Total Spent on Project 52,216.18 - Total Remaining 79,783.82
HENlOB South Pittman Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 3,000,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
0 0 0 2,600,OOO 400,000 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 -i. Total Remaining 3,000,000.00 - HEN12A99 Gibson Channel Expiration Date 12/31/2000 Interlocal Amount 105,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 5,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 105,000.00
28 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 Las Vegas
LAS01 B95 Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion Expiration Date 03/03/2001 Interlocal Amount 793,500 lnterlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 696,000 70,000 27,500
Amount Spent by Category Construction 187J33.73 Construction Eng 23,567.88 Total Spent on Project 211,401.61 Total Remaining 582,098.39
LAS03D98 Gowan South Detention Basin Expansion Expiration Date 04/30/2000 Interlocal Amount 150,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 150,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 335.88 Total Spent on Project 335.88 Total Remaining 149,664.12 - LASO9F93 Washington Avenue System Sagman to LV Expiration Date 03/03/2000 - Interlocal Amount 270,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 270,000 0 0 0 0 0
- Amount Spent by Category ROW 245,428.78 Total Spent on Project 245,428.78 Total Remaining 24,571.22 -
- 29 3 - Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 LAS09H94 Upper Washington Avenue Channel Expiration Date 03/03/2000 - Interlocal Amount 1,250,000 n Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 50,000 19,098 1,180,902 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 1,147,849.02 ROWPredesign 12,055.451,662.33 -
Total Spent on Project 1,161,566.80 Total Remaining 88,433.20 -
LASO9J97 Freeway Channel System/Alta - UPRR Expiration Date 12/30/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 13,469,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 13,369,OOO 100,000 0
Amount Spent by Category Construction 8,648,438.45 Construction Eng 49,392.57 ROW 0.00 --- Total Spent on Project 8,697,831.02 Total Remaining 4,771 J68.98 -
LAS09K97 Upper Washington/Sagman-Bonanza Expiration Date 12/30/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 4,359,562 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 4,109,562 250,000 0
Amount Spent by Category Construction 4,108,903.05 Construction Eng 148,200.13 Total Spent on Project 4,257,103.18 - Total Remaining 102,458.82
30 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 LASO9L98 Freeway Channel/Alta-Sahara Expiration Date 12/31/1999 Interlocal Amount 3,827,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 2,326,OOO 0 1,501,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 473,353.97 Total Spent on Project 473,353.97 Total Remaining 3,353,646.03
LAS09M98 Freeway Channel North- Washington to Vegas Expiration Date 04/30/2000 Interlocal Amount 200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
2,000 0 198,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 200,000.00
-- LAS1 OD95 Gowan North Channel/Det. Basin to Duran Expiration Date 12/31/1999 Interlocal Amount 1,098,OOO - Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 728,000 0 370,000 - 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 363,766.44 - ROW 193,964.OO Total Spent on Project 557,730.44 Total Remaining 540,269.56
-
31 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 LAS1 OE97 Gowan North ChanneVDB-Buffalo Cons Expiration Date 03/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 3,387,926 r\ Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 3,166,286 221,640 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 3,019,189.42 - Construction Eng 103,723X Total Spent on Project 3,122,912.57 Total Remaining 265013.43 -
LAS10F97 Gowan Outfall/Lone Mtn Branch/Ferrell-Kenny Expiration Date 12/31/1999 - Interlocal Amount 150,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 3,000 0 147,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 41,178.40 Total Spent on Project 41,178.40 ,A- Total Remaining 108,821.60 -~ LASlOH98 Gowan North Buffalo Branch/Gowan No-Lone Expiration Date 12/31/1999 Interlocal Amount 303,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 303,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 90,997.75 Total Spent on Project 90,997.75 Total Remaining 212,002.25
32 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 LASlOJ98 Gowan North Channel - Alexander to Lone Mtn Expiration Date 04/30/2000 Interlocal Amount 580,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 1,000 0 579,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 142535.21 Total Spent on Project 142,535.21 Total Remaining 437,464.79
LASlOK99 CAM 10 Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000 Interlocal Amount 200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 1,000 0 151,000 0 0 48,000
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 200,000.00
LAS14A95 Washington Ave/l-15 to Martin Luther King Expiration Date 03/03/2001 Interlocal Amount 70,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
- 0 0 70,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 66,094.04 - Total Spent on Project 66,094.04 Total Remaining 3,905.96
-
-
-
‘-1
- 33 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 LAS1 5A95 Oakey Storm Drain - l-15 to Decatur Blvd. Expiration Date 03/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 430,000 ,-. Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 5,000 425,000 0 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category PreDesign 355,860.61 Total Spent ,on Project 355,860.61 - Total Remaining 74,139.39
LAS1 6A98 Ann Rd Channel West System/Ranch0 - Allen Ln Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 950,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 5,000 0 945,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 - Total Remaining 950,000.00
A- LAS17A98 Las Vegas Wash Ranch0 Dr System Expiration Date 12/31/2OC Interlocal Amount 300,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 2,000 0 298,000 0 0 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 300,000.00
34 Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 LAS1 8A98 Las Vegas Wash-Smoke Ranch System Expiration Date 04/30/2000 Interlocal Amount 137,000 \- Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
1,000 0 136,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 137,ooo.oo
LAS1 9A99 Owens Avenue System - Ranch0 to l-15 Expiration Date 04/30/2001 Interlocal Amount 200,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 200,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 200,000.00
-
-
35 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 North Las Vegas f---. N LV08A94 Western Tributary of the Lower Las Vegas Was Expiration Date 06/30/l 95, -- interlocal Amount 2,650,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other ~ 2,142,OOO 0 508,000 0 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 507,868.69 ROW 2,125,131.29 Total Spent on Project 2,632,999.98 Total Remaining 17,000.02
NLV08B97 Lower Las Vegas Wash Det Basin Construction Expiration Date 12/31/2000 _ Interlocal Amount 4,126,759 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other -~ 0 0 0 3,803,132 285,126 38,500 -- Amount Spent by Category Construction 2,998,894.86 Construction Eng 278,827.49 Other 38,500.OO Total Spent on Project 3,316,222.35 Total Remaining 810,536.67
-
36 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 NLV09A94 Western Tributary of the Range Wash Channel Expiration Date 12/31/1999 interlocal Amount 2,800,OOO c interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 2,100,000 0 700,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 523,674.15 ROW 1,662,780.12 Total Spent on Project 2,186,454.27 Total Remaining 613,545.73
NLVI OA97 “A” Channel/Lake Mead Blvd-Las Vegas Wash Expiration Date 07/O l/2000 Interlocal Amount 1,400,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 100,000 400,000 900,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 559,624.91 Total Spent on Project 559,624.91 Total Remaining 840,375.09
NLVI OB99 Cheyenne Peaking Basin Expiration Date 06/30/2001 Interlocal Amount 3,974,ooo - Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 3,474,ooo 0 500,000 0 - 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 - Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 3,974,ooo.oo -
-
-
37 L Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 NLVI IA97 West Trib LV WashKamino-Ann Expiration Date 12/01/1999 - Inter-local Amount 1,200,000 P Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other ‘- 750,000 0 450,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 447,858.38 ROW 746,554.42 - Total Spent on Project 1,194,412.80 Total Remaining 5587.20 -
NLVI 1 B97 West Trib LV Wash/Ann-Centennial Expiration Date 12/01/1999 Interlocal Amount 2,400,OOO -~ Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 1,900,000 0 500,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category Design Eng 379,718.84 ROW 1 ,I 33,964.30 Total Spent on Project 1,513,683.14 --- Total Remaining 886,316.86
NLVI 3A98 Trib to W Trib at Craig Rd Expiration Date 06/30/2000 - Interlocal Amount 565,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 298,000 0 267,000 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Design Eng 40,298.83 Total Spent on Project 40,298.83 Total Remaining 524,701 .I7
38 Regional Flood Control District 11/08/1999 Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Reporting Pay As You Go Funds (Fund 443)
Boulder City ‘L Project Name Status Total BOUOlA87 Hemenway Wash (443) Closed 4,649,ooo.oo BOU02A88 Georgia Avenue Channel Closed 613,590.23 BOU03A88 Buchannan Blvd. Channel Closed 412,720.OO BOU03B98 Buchanan Watershed Facilities Closed 420,240.41 - BOUO4A96 West Airport Watershed Closed 128,138.69 BOUO4B97 West Airport Watershed Construction Closed 1,839,686.60 BOUO5A98 North Railroad Watershed Open 100,000.00 BOUO6A99 Ville Drive Flood Control Facilities Open 50,000.00 $8,213,375.93
Clark County Project Name Status Total BUNOIASO Bunkerville Channel Windmill Wash Open 819,384.OO BUN01 B98 Bunkerville Flood Control Improvements/Cons Open 6,554,OOO.OO CL03H93 Van Buskirk Channel Improvements (443) Closed 6,112,843.32 - CLAOlA87 Upper Flamingo Wash Det. Basin & Outfall Closed 6,932,932.63 CLAO2A88 Rawhide Channel Closed 69,932.30 ClAO2890 Rawhide Channel Eastern Ave Closed 155,540.oo cLAo2c90 Rawhide Channel Eastern Ave Outfall Closed 115,000.00 - CLA02D90 Rawhide Channel Eastern to Toapz Closed I ,069,252.07 CLA02E91 Rawhide Channel Mcleod to Mtn. Vista Closed 166,990.74 ClA02G99 Rawhide Channel at Sagebrush Street Open 500,000.00 -d ClAO3A88 Van Buskirk Channel Predesign Closed 118,463.30 ClAO3B90 Van Buskirk Channel Outfall Closed 3,332,227.08 cLAo3c90 Van Buskirk Channel Right-of-Way Closed 3,158,610.37 CLA03D91 Van Buskirk System Open 850,OOO.OO - ClAO4A89 Flamingo Wash Bridge at Eastern Avenue Closed 61,900.OO CLAO4B89 Flamingo Wash Bridge at Arville Closed 294,818.61 cLAo4c90 Flamingo Wash Brdgs. Paradise, Palos Verde Closed 1,711,276.60 - ClA04D93 Flamingo Wash Winnick Ave Closed 3,000,000.00 ClA04E99 Flamingo Wash-McLeod to Maryland Open 500,000.00 CLAO4F99 Flamingo Wash-Boulder to McLeod Open 500,000.00 CLA05A91 Duck Creek Channel Pachuca & Tomiyasu Closed 814,243.47 CLAO6A91 Range Wash Detention Basin Facilities Closed 479,952.25 ClA07A92 Sloan Channel Closed 4,820,788.11 CLAO8A92 Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin Open 950,000.00 - CLA08B93 Lower Duck Creek Det. Basin Closed 5,921,764.42 CLAO9A97 Durango Collector Open 388,OOO.OO CIA1 OA97 Tropicana Wash/Paradise-Koval Open 240,OOO.OO - CIA1 2A97 Desert Inn Detention Basin 8 Collection Sys Open 370,000.00 CiA12B98 Desert Inn Detention Basin & Collection Sy Open 43,i 97.00 CLA13A97 Lakes Det Basin/Collection Sys/Outfall Open 450,000.00 Lakes Det Basin/Co11 SyslOutfall Phase I Open I .120,000.00 - CLAl3B98 CLA14A97 Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie Open 400,000.00 clA14c99 Duck Creek Channel-Sunset to Eastern Open 200,000.00 ‘z CIA1 4D99 Duck Creek Channel-Hollywood to Stephanie Open 900,000.00 - CLA14E99 Duck Creek-Stephanie to Green Valley Parkway Open 488.000.00 CLA16A98 Up Duck (DK), Ctrl DK,Lwr BD & Bird SP DB’s Open 200,000.00 u CIA1 9A99 Red Rock Channel-Naples Branch Open 400,000.00 CLA2OA99 Washington Collection System Open 49,ooo.oo COEG194 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project Open 1 oo,ooo.oo COEG294 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Flood Control Open 16,500,000.00 GSPOlA88 Goodsprings Flood Control improvements 99.000.00 39 ‘.
Clark County Project Name Status Total - INDOlA98 Indian Springs Flood Control Improvements Open 1 oo,ooo.oo LAUOlA89 Laughlin Unnamed Wash Closed 349,995.99 f-==. LAUO2A89 Laughlin Hiko Springs Closed 369,974.40 - LAUO2B92 Laughlin Hike Springs Remap Closed 8,OOO.OO LAUO3A96 Hiko Springs Detention Basin Outfall Channel Open 8,375,OOO.OO MOAOlA89 Moapa Cooper Ave Crossing Closed 185,OOO.OO MOAOI B89 Moapa Valley Muddy River West Levee Open 1,850,OOO.OO MOA02A89 Moapa Valley Logan 8 Benson Wash Closed 235,040.74 MOA02B92 Moapa Valley Logan Wash Construction Closed 3,510,528.60 NELOlA88 Nelson Flood Control Improvements Closed 2.961.95 SEAOlA88 Searchlight Flood Control Improvements Closed 861,099.97 SEA01 B99 Searchlight Flood Control Improvements Open 7,500.oo TROPFLAM Tropicana/Flamingo Washes Project Open 2,588,234.41 - $69,400,452.33
Henderson Project Name Status Total HENOlA87 Pittman Wash Channel Closed 533,554.14 HEN01 B87 Warm Springs Stephanie Bridges Closed 1,666,309.54 HENOlC90 Pittman Wash Chnl Phase I Construction Closed 2,744,110.10 HEN02A89 Green Valley Parkway Bridge Closed 1,128,513.78 HEN03A91 UPRR Channel (443) Closed 117,073.57 HENO4A91 C-l Channel System Open 1,050,000.00 HENO4B93 Cl Burkholder to Lake Mead Drive Closed 173,333.98 HEN04E96 Mission Hills Western Interceptor (443) Open 3,358,OOO.OO HEN04F97 Black Mountain Detention Basin Open 325,OOO.OO HEN04198 C-l Channel Culvert @ Lake Mead Drive Open 905,960.OO HEN04K99 C-l Channel-Upper 8 Middle Reaches Open 505,000.00 HEN05A92 Pioneer Detention Basin Open 3,749,485.00 HEN06A93 Equestrian Drive Detention Basin Closed 3889624.49 HEN06B95 Equestrian Detention Basin Construction Open 6,400,OOO.OO HEN07A96 Pittman Park Detention Basin Open 2,295,ooo.oo HEN08A96 Railroad East Detention Basin Open 2,200,000.00 HEN09A99 Pittman Wash Eastern Detention Basin Open 132,OOO.OO HEN1 OB99 South Pittman Detention Basin Open 3,000,000.00 HEN12A99 Gibson Channel Open 105,000.00 $30,776,964.60
Las Vegas Project Name Status Total LASOlA87 Angel Park Detention Basin Structure Closed 397,978.73 LAS01 895 Angel Park Detention Basin Expansion Open 793,500.oo LASO2A87 Buffalo Channel Angel Park Detention Basin Closed 4,167,183.73 LASO2B91 Buffalo Channel Summerlin to Vegas Drive Closed 126,491.20 LAso2c91 Buffalo Channel Westcliff Summerlin Closed 471,594.88 lAS02D92 Buffalo Channel Design Doe Westcliff Closed 84,175.72 LASO2F93 Buffalo Channel Doe to Westcliff Closed 1,685,430.55 lASO3A89 Gowan Rd. Detention System Closed 195,685.OO LASO3B89 Gowan Detention Basin and Outfall Closed 4,813,519.80 lAS03D98 Gowan South Detention Basin Expansion Open 150,000.00 LASO4A87 Oakey System Predesign Closed 111,106.72 LAS04B90 Oakey Blvd. System Closed 631,418.63 lAso4c91 Oakey Blvd Det 8 Convey at Decatur Closed 35,ooo.oo LAS04E94 Oakey Detention Basin and Collection System Closed 1.083848.86 LASO5A87 Meadows Detention Basin Design Closed 120,000.00 40 - Las Vegas Project Name Status Total lASO5B87 Meadows Detention Basin Construction Closed 3,445,946.32 LAS06A87 Major Conveyance West of 115 Closed 232,793.47 LAS06B87 Major Conveyance East of I1 5 Closed 29,500.25 - lASO6C93 NDOT Freeway Channel Sahara to Ivanhoe Closed 670,067.29 LASO7A89 Durango Storm Drain Closed 596,059.OO LASO8A89 Carey Avenue Lake Mead Detention Basin Closed 6,148,651.98 LASO9A89 Washington Ave. Convey System Closed 313,726.91 lASO9B91 Washington Avenue System Sandhill to Bruce Closed 497,ooo.oo - LAS09D92 Washington Ave System Construction Closed 1,594,925.69 LASO9F93 Washington Avenue System Sagman to LV Creek Open 270,OOO.OO tAS09G94 Washington Ave. Conveyance - Lena to Easter Closed 4,643,824.92 - lAS09H94 Upper Washington Avenue Channel Open 1,250,000.00 LAS09196 Washington Ave. System - Eastern to Sagman Closed 3,078,027.28 LASO9J97 Freeway Channel System/Alta - UPRR Open 13,469,OOO.OO LAS09K97 Upper WashingtonlSagman-Bonanza Open 4,359,562.00 LAS09L98 Freeway Channel/Alta-Sahara Open 3,827,OOO.OO LAS09M98 Freeway Channel North- Washington to Vegas Open 200,000.00 lASlOA91 Gowan North Channel Closed 110,000.00 lASlOB93 CAM 10 8 Lone Mt Detention Basin Closed 212,800.OO LAS1 oc94 Lone Mt. Detention Basin (443) Closed 905,972.72 LAS1 OD95 Gowan North ChanneVDet. Basin to Duran Open 1,098,000.00 LAS1 OE97 Gowan North ChannellDB-Buffalo Cons Open 3,387,926.00 LAS1 OF97 Gowan Outfall/Lone Mtn Branch/Ferrell-Kenny Open 150,000.00 LAS1 OH98 Gowan North Buffalo BranchlGowan No-Lone Mtn Open 303,000.00 LAS1 OJ98 Gowan North Channel - Alexander to Lone Mtn Open 580.000.00 - LAS1 OK99 CAM IO Detention Basin Open 200,000.00 LAS1 IA92 Angel Park Peccole 1 Rampart Strom Drain Closed 44,809.03 LAS1 1 B93 Rampart Storm Drain Closed 185,842.34 -u lAs12A92 Alta Storm Drain Closed 851,465.76 LAS13A92 Cheyenne Channel Buffalo Gowan Detention Bas Closed 86,475.85 IASI 3894 Cheyenne Channel Crossings Closed 709,000.00 LAS1 3c93 Cheyenne Channel - Buffalo to Gowan South Closed 1,107,787.47 - LAS 14A95 Washington Ave/l-15 to Martin Luther King Open 70,000.00 LAS1 5A95 Oakey Storm Drain - l-15 to Decatur Blvd. Open 430,000.00 LAS1 6A98 Ann Rd Channel West System/Ranch0 - Allen Ln Open 950,000.00 - LAS1 7A98 Las Vegas Wash Ranch0 Dr System Open 300,000.00 LAS1 8A98 Las Vegas Wash-Smoke Ranch System Open 137,000.00 IASI 9A99 , Owens Avenue System - Ranch0 to l-15 200,000.00 - $71,513,098.10
Mesquite Project Name Status Total MESOlA88 Town Wash ROW Engineering Closed 9,600.OO - MESOl 889 Town Wash Detention Basin (443) Closed 660,000.00 $669,600.00
41 North Las Vegas Project Name Status Total NLVOlA87 LV Wash “A” Channel Improvements Closed 304,000.00 NLVOl B87 LV Wash Craig Civic Center *(King Charles) Closed 2,415,411.73 -. NLV02A87 West Trib LV Wash Craig Alex Closed 1,268,170.85 NLVOZB88 West Trib LV Wash Upper Mendenhall Closed 1,057,430.33 NLV03A88 East Range Wash Detention Basin Closed 273,068.12 NLV03B88 East Range Wash Detention Basin Predesign Closed 30,000.00 NLV03C91 West Range Wash Diversion Dike Closed 339,338.71 - NLV04A89 Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure Closed 13,373,572.56 NLV05A89 Upper LV Wash Detention Basin Closed 1,595,142.36 NLV06A91 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Design and ROW Closed 601,126.71 - NLV06B93 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Construction Closed 8,452,713.96 NLV07A92 Camino Al None Closed 86,191.OO NLV08A94 Western Tributary of the Lower Las Vegas Was Open 2,650,OOO.OO NLV08B97 Lower Las Vegas Wash Det Basin Construction Open 4,126,759.02 NLV09A94 Western Tributary of the Range Wash Channel Open 2,800,OOO.OO NLVlOA97 “A” Channel/Lake Mead Blvd-Las Vegas Wash Open 1,400,000.00 NLVlOB99 Cheyenne Peaking Basin Open 3,974,ooo.oo NLVI lA97 West Trib LV Wash/Camino-Ann Open 1,200,000.00 NLVI 1897 West Trib LV Wash/Ann-Centennial Open 2,400,OOO.OO NLV12A97 Clayton Channel Closed 40,408.90 NLVI 3A98 Trib to W Trib at Craig Rd Open 565,OOO.OO
$48,952,334.25 - Total Funded $249,525,825.21
,--
-
42 FY 1999IOO PROJECT LIST _ FUNDING Ri%lESTSUMMARY
Improvements (HMVL 0026.0032,
Duck Creek-Hollywood to Stephanie
II (LXWA-1216 & DCWA-1169) -
- in Funding) (TRWA-OOOO
ao.ocj 1 $7.500.00 ($7.500.00) Clark Counly (Outlying Areas) Total1 51,267,WO.OO~ 1 ($792,500.00~ $f059,500.00
-
‘-1
43 FY lSSS/OO PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY -
r-Y
_ 1st Supplemental
don- 3rd Supplemental (APNO-
ntion Basin (RCH04000 -.-
-
N 1680) (Cheyenne Peaking FUNDING REQUESTS REPORT (FY 1999/00)
. I 12 I l&Aug-99 Supplemental 77.000.00 I HEN : 00-12 i 9-Sep-99 13 10Aug-99 North Railroad Watershed - 2nd Supplemental 20.000.00 1 BOU 00-13 I 9-Sep-99 1 Desert Inn Detention Basin and Collection System - 2nd I 14 I lO-Aug-99 ‘Supplemental 100.000.00 / cc ( 00-14 ~ 9-Sep-99 I I I Western Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash, Phase 3 - 15 ! lO-Aug-99 Decrease in funding per 1st Supplemental (i.975.490.00)/ NLV / 00-15 i 12~ 9-Sep-99 Cheyenne Peaking Basin - Design/ROW Engineering/ I / 16 ! 15Sep99 ‘ROWAcquisition 3.974.000.00 i NLV I 00-16 i 14-act-99 17 I 15Sep-99 Yille Drive Flood Control Improvements - Design 50.000.00 I BOU / 00-17 ; 14-0~~99 16 1 21-Sep-99 ,Gibson Channel at Sunset Road - Design 105000.00 1 HEN ~ 00-18 ! woct-99 ‘Las Vegas Wash Rancho Drive System - Peak to Lake I 19 ~ 11-Ott-99 /Mead 45.000.w / LAS I 00-19 ; 1 O-Now99 20 ~ II-M-99 iAngel Park Detention Basin Expansion 729.5oo.w I LAS / 00-20 1 O-Now99 21 ! 1 l-O&99 IGowan North System I Buffalo Branch 185.903.W I LAS / 00-21 i 1 O-Now99 1 ~Rancho Road System - Centenial to Rancho Detention I ’ 22 i ll-O&99 IBasin 30.0w.w ; LAS 00-22 / ’ 10Nov-99 1Rancho Road System - Centenial to Ranch0 Detention 23 I 11-Ott-99 /Basin 1.956.93o.w ~ LAS O&23 i 1 lO-Now99 I / 24 , 12-O&99 IVandenberg Detention Basin (Reduction in Funding) (5W.OOO.O0)/ NLV ~ 00-24 i 18A lO-Nov-99 IWestern Tributary of the Las Vegas Wash - Camino Al I -d 25 : 12-O&99 iNorte to Am Road 500.000.00 1 NLV ~ 00-25 i’ : IO-Now99 I .Tropicana Wash - Paradise to Koval (Reduction in 26 14-Od-99 iFunding) (900.000.W); CC ~ 00-26 ~ 17A I lO-Now99 27 14-Ott-99 j Durango Collector (Reduction in Funding) (1.000.000.00)! CC I 00-27 , 12A lO-Now99 i Duck Creek - Hollywood to Stephanie (Reduction in / 26 , M-06-99 ‘Funding) i (200.000.W) ; CC i 00-28 / IO-Now99 Freeway Channel - Alta to Sahara and Bypass Facility - ~ / 29 i 28Ott-99 ~Wall to Sahara 2.787.000.W / I 00-29 15A I I I I I ~ Total1 $11.229343 1 I
1 I I I ! . I I
I I I
,
I
I I I I ! 0 / t
.
5 11/8/1999 OOPRIORIlY.XI * w 45 S-1 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444 - FUND BALANCE REPORT OCTOBER 1999
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $144,826.880.46
REVENUES: Interest 517,635.78 Due from Other Funds 0.00 Project Close-Out Adjustment 0.00 Accrued Interest 0.00 Other . 0.00
TOTAL MONTHLY REVENUES $517,635.78
EXPENDITURES: Capital Improvement Project Expenditures (3,545,802.31) Professional Services (8.366.68) CIP Transfer for NLV08B97 to Close 1991 Bond 0.00 Prior Period Accrual/Adjustment (1.078,215.04)
TOTAL MONTHLY EXPENSES ($4.632.384.03)
ENDING CASH BALANCE (FUND 444) $140,712,132.21
CURRENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST BOND FUNDS: Accounts Payable (1 t735.936.20) Remaining Obligated ILC Funding - 1998 Bond (104.793.256.00) -- LAS09099 Funds Earmarked for the Construction of the Freeway Channel (28.013.000.00)
TOTAL CURRENT OBLIGATIONS ($134,542.192.20)
UNOBLIGATED BOND FUNDS $6,169,940.01
CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS PROJECT FISCAL NUMBER SCOPE IMPACT
LAS09099 Freeway Channel - Additional funding request (See above) (2,787,OOO.OO)
TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDING ($2,787,000.00)
AVAILABLE BALANCE $3,382.940.01
11/a/1999 /jpd 46 Regional Flood Control District - Monthly Expenditures Fund 444 PO Invoice invoice Proiect Number Vendor Number p& Amount L- NLVI 1 D99 132856 01 American Asphalt & Grad. 5 09/30/l 999 649,283.21 INV EXP INVEXP CC Treasurer 00 04 10131l1999 8.366.68 LAS1 0198 139111 02 City of Las Vegas 24558 09/l 311999 723,685.OO LAS1 0198 13911102 City of Las Vegas 24773 1 o/07/1 999 398,162.81 NLVl 1 D99 132860 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400284 09/l 7/l 999 23,954.43 NLVI 1 E99 138112 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400282 09/I 7/I 999 7,626.61 NLVI 1 C98 126894 01 City of North Las Vegas AR 400283 09/l 7/1999 9,017.82 CLAI OB99 139855 01 French Consulting Service 0001692 08/23/l 999 2,850.OO CL41 OB99 139855 01 French Consulting Service 0001705 09/20/l 999 950.00 CLAI OB99 139855 02 French Consulting Service 0001705 09/20/l 999 1,150.00 NLVI 1 C98 126895 01 G C Wallace, Inc. 15293 09/24/l 999 42,271 .OO NLV09B99 none Habitat Conservation/CC T 093099 09/30/l 999 23,100.OO NLVI 1 E99 none Habitat Conservation/CC T 093099 09/30/l 999 41,250.OO CIA1 2099 137415 01 Las Vegas Valley Water Di 1062 08/03/l 999 21,228.OO HEN04J99 137427 01 Morrison Knudsen 3 09/27/l 999 948,944.89 NLVI 1 E99 138109 01 Morrison Knudsen 1 1010111999 206,988.03 NLVI 1 E99 138110 01 Pentacore Engineering 0014311 09/20/l 999 23,378.OO CLAI 3C98 136194 01 Poggemeyer Design Group 13698 08/I 511999 25,330.94 CLAI 3C98 136194 01 Poggemeyer Design Group 13803 08/30/l 999 54,689.82 CLA14B99 none United Title Company 99118477-036 09/27/l 999 56,639.50 CIA1 3C98 138001 01 Wells Cargo, Inc. 01 09/l 711999 285,302.25 $3,554,168.99
-
-
-
-
47 1110811999 Regional Flood Control District 1998 Bond List $150,000,000 issue
! ,,,w--- ) / ) ’ UP I I I I I ! I I I I I I
Project Description Estimated Costs Regional Flood Control District 1998 Bond List $150,000,000 issue
Notes: 1 Project CLAl7A98. Blue Diamond Channel, Approved 10/8/98. Item #II, $2,061.000 8 Project CLAi8A98. Red Rock Channel, Approved 10/E/98, Item #lo, $3.617,000 2 $8,026.044 original contract approved 1018/98. Item #08 & $302.000 1st supplemental for construction approved 1 l/12/98, Item #09B 3 Includes S2,500.000 supplemental. approved E/12/99, #8A 4 Includes ($1.975,490) supplemental to reduce funding, approved g/9/99. #21. 5 Includes ($l.OOO.O@O) supplemental lo reduce funding. approved 1 l/10/99, #17. 6 Includes ($900,000) supplemental to reduce funding, approved 11/10/99, #lg. 7 Includes ($500.000) supplemental lo reduce funding, approved 11/10/99. #I5 8 $28.013,000 was earmarked for the Freeway Channel, Alta to Sahara 8 Bypass Facility from Wall to Sahara. Approved 418199. #24. Additional 2.787.000 is pending approval 12/09/99.
Bond Issue Information:
October 2, 1998 Bond Proceeds: $ 150,885,OlO Interest Earned to date: $ 7,147,263 Gross amount available for funding CIP: $ 156,032,273
Total CIP funded: $ 154,651,025 * Net amount available for funding CIP: $ 3,381,247
l l Includes pending requests on this agenda.
I I Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 Fund 444 C/ark County i/
CLAO8C98 Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin Expiration Date 07/01/2001 interlocal Amount 13,700,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 12,125,200 1,574,800 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 13,700,000.00
CLA09B99 Durango Collector Expiration Date 07/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 11,826,500 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 10,850,OOO 976,500 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00
-4 Construction Eng 5,642.OO Total Spent on Project 5,642.OO Total Remaining 11,820,858.00 -
CLAI OB99 Tropicana Wash Channel - Paradise to Koval Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 3,270,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Construction Con. Eng. Other - Right of Way Predesign Design 0 0 0 3,000,000 270,000 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 661,361 .OO Construction Eng 31,703.25 Total Spent on Project 693,064.25 Total Remaining 2,576,935.75 -
-
‘4
51 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 cLA12c99 Desert Inn Detention Basin & Collection Sys. Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 5,570,ooo ./--‘\ Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 4,910,000 660,000 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 21,228.OO Construction Eng 1,272.37 Total Spent on Project 22500.37 Total Remaining 5,547,499.63
CLAI 3C98 Lakes Detention Basin Collection System Expiration Date 07/01/2000 - Interlocal Amount 18,470,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 16,500,OOO 1,970,000 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 1,147,049.13 Construction Eng 80,020.76 Total Spent on Project 1,227,069.89 Total Remaining 17,242,930.11
CLA14B99 Duck Creek, Hollywood to Stephanie Expiration Date 07/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 2,500,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other _ 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 ROW 821,407.50 Total Spent on Project 821,407.50 Total Remaining 1,678,592.50
-
52 Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 CLAI 5B99 Colorado Avenue Storm Drain Expiration Date 07/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 12,880,OOO u Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 11,500,000 1,380,OOO 0
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 12,880,000.00 -
CLAI 7A98 Blue Diamond Channel, Durango to Rainbow Blv Expiration Date 07/01/2001 - Interlocal Amount 2,061,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 2,061,OOO 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining 2,061 ,OOO.OO
--.-l CLAI 8A98 Red Rock Ch, Russell Rd to Hualapai Way Expiration Date 07/01/2001 Interlocal Amount 3,617,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 3,617,OOO 0 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 - Total Remaining 3,617,OOO.OO
-
-
-
53 , Current Project Expense Summary 1 l/08/1999 - Henderson ./f--l HEN04C93 Cl Channel Mission Hills Expiration Date 12/31/19S” - inter-local Amount 6,135,402 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 5,568,495 500,500 66,407
Amount Spent by Category Construction 4,867,132.17 Construction Eng 425,952.40 - Other 85367.70 Total Spent on Project 5,378,452.27 Total Remaining 756,949.73
HEN04J99 Black Mountain Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000 _~ Interlocal Amount 6,875,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 6,325,OOO 500,000 50,000 -,-- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 2,133,635.00 Construction Eng 182,912.14 Other 26,877.OO Total Spent on Project 2,343,424.14 Total Remaining 4,531,575.86
54 Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 HEN05B98 Pioneer Detention Basin Outfall - Phase I Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 5,000,000 u Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 4,650,OOO 350,000 0
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 Total Remaining - 5,000,000.00
HN04E96 Mission Hills Western Interceptor (444) Expiration Date 12/31/1998 Interlocal Amount 2,100,000 Interlocal Funding Allocation -- Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 2,100,000 0 0
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 2,l oo,ooo.oo Total Spent on Project 2,l oo,ooo.oo Total Remaining 0.00
--
-
55 Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 Las Vegas n LAS09N99 Upper Washington Ave. Conveyance System Expiration Date 12/30/2OL . - interlocal Amount 6,880,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 6,590,OOO 290,000 0 - Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Total Spent on Project 0.00 - Total Remaining 6,880,000.00
LAS1 0198 Durango Dr/Gowan N Channel - Phase II Expiration Date 08/31/2000 -- Interlocal Amount 6,692,OOO Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other
0 0 0 6,492,OOO 200,000 0 -
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 4,291 ,I 14.76 ,I- Construction Eng 34,003.81 Total Spent on Project 4,325, I 18.57 - Total Remaining 2,366,881.43
56 Current Project Expense Summary - 11/08/1999 North Las Vegas - C’ NLV09B99 Vandenberg Detention Basin Expiration Date 12/31/2000
- interlocal Amount 6523,100 Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 5,900,000 600,000 23,100
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 OTHER 23,100.OO Total Spent on Project 23,100.OO - Total Remaining 6,500,OOO.OO
- NLVI lC98 West Trib LV Wash - Ph l/Ann Rd to Clayton Expiration Date 12/31/l 999 Interlocal Amount 8,328,044 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 7,502,ooo 816,000 10,044
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 6,975,892.32 -L-l’ Construction Eng 490,662.34 Total Spent on Project 7,466,554.66 Total Remaining - , 861,489.34
NLVI 1 D99 Western Tributary, Las Vegas Wash, Phase 3 Expiration Date 06/30/2000 - Interlocal Amount 3,059,254 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 2,800,OOO 252,000 7,254
- Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 1,688,336.47
- Construction Eng 125,165.83 Total Spent on Project I,81 3,502.30 Total Remaining 1,245,751.70 -
‘-J
57 - Current Project Expense Summary 11/08/1999 NLVI 1 E99 Western Trib to the Las Vegas Wash-Phase II Expiration Date 12/31/2000 - Interlocal Amount 8,241,250 n Interlocal Funding Allocation Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other - 0 0 0 7,300,000 900,000 41,250
Amount Spent by Category 0.00 Construction 207,788.03 - Construction Eng 67,219.84 OTHER 41,250.oo Total Spent on Project 316,257.87 - Total Remaining 7,924,992.13
NV08B97 Lower Las Vegas Wash Det Basin Construction Expiration Date 05/01/l 999 - Interlocal Amount 4,433,240 Interlocal Funding Allocation - Right of Way Predesign Design Construction Con. Eng. Other 0 0 0 4,091,867 341,373 0 -
Amount Spent by Category Construction 4,091,867.17 Construction Eng 341,373.81 -- Total Spent on Project 4,433,240.98 Total Remaining 0.00 -
-
-
58 Regional Flood Control District 11108/1999 Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Repotting Bond Fund (Fund 444) - Project Status L-’ Boulder City - BOUOlA87 Hemenway Wash (444) Closed 867,OOO.OO $867,000.00
Clark County
- CLAO2F92 Rawhide Channel McLeod to Mt Vista Closed 2,678,784.24 CLA03E92 Van Buskirk System, Rochelle to Closed 884,145.27 CLAO3F92 Van Buskirk Channel Phase V Closed 1,318,316.18 CLA03G92 Van Buskirk Channel Phase IV Closed 949,302.79 CLA03H93 Van Buskirk Channel Phase IIA and Closed 7,076,269.80 CLAOGA East Range Wash Detention Basin Closed 0.00 CLAO6B93 Range Wash Confluence Detention Closed 9,575,705.90 CLAO8C98 Lower Duck Creek Detention Basin Open 13,700,000.00 CLAO9B99 Durango Collector Open 11,826,500.00 -- CLAlOB99 Tropicana Wash Channel - Paradise to Open 3,270,OOO.OO CIA1 2c99 Desert Inn Detention Basin & Collection Open 5,570,000.00 CLA13C98 Lakes Detention Basin Collection Open 18,470,800.00 CLA14B99 Duck Creek, Hollywood to Stephanie Open 2,500,OOO.OO - CLA15B99 Colorado Avenue Storm Drain Open 12,880,000.00 CIA1 7A98 Blue Diamond Channel, Durango to Open 2,061 ,OOO.OO CLAI 8A98 Red Rock Ch, Russell Rd to Hualapai Open 3,617,OOO.OO -d LAUOI 892 Unnamed Wash Closed 2,577,722.08 LAuo2c94 Hiko Springs Wash Detention Basin Closed 1,200,000.00 100,155,546.26 -
Henderson - HEN01 D91 Pittman Wash Channel Phase II Closed 2,071,148.80 HEN01 E93 Pittman Wash Phase III Closed 776,682.83 HEN03B92 UPRR Channel (444) Closed 2,149,477.47 HEN04C93 Cl Channel Mission Hills Open 6,135,402.00 HEN04D94 C-l Channel/Lk Mead Dr-Drake Chnl Closed 3,398,432.50 HEN04J99 Black Mountain Detention Basin Open 6,875,OOO.OO - HEN05B98 Pioneer Detention Basin Outfall - Phase Open 5,000,000.00 HN04E96 Mission Hills Western Interceptor (444) Open 2,l oo,ooo.oo $28,506,143.60
Las Vegas
LAS02E92 Buffalo Channel Summerlin Vegas Closed I,91 1,377.65 LAso3c91 Gowan Detention Basin Closed 7,184,517.75 LASO4D92 Oakey Blvd Detention Basin Closed 6,887,121.59 LAso9c91 Washington Ave System Sandhill Outfall Closed 1,496,312.93 ’ d LAS09E93 Washington Ave Virgil Lena Closed 2,862,675.33 LAS09N99 Upper Washington Ave. Conveyance Open 6,880,000.00 LAS10198 Durango Dr/Gowan N Channel - Phase Open 6,692,OOO.OO LSI oc94 Lone Mt. Detention Basin (444) Closed 315482.25
59 Regional Flood Control District 11/08/1999' Capital Improvement Projects - Cumulative Reporting Bond Fund (Fund 444)
f---l Proiect Status Total - $34,229,487.50
Mesquite
MESOI 889 Town Wash Detention Basin (444) Closed 3,692,545.65 $3,692,545.65
Notih Las Vegas
NLV03D93 West Range Wash Dike Closed 2,251,608.79 NLV05B92 Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin Closed 8,163,818.87 NLV09B99 Vandenberg Detention Basin Open 6,523,100.00 NLVI 1 C98 West Trib LV Wash - Ph l/Ann Rd to Open 8,328,044.00 NLVI 1 D99 Western Tributary, Las Vegas Wash, Open 3,059,254.00 NLVI 1 E99 Western Trib to the Las Vegas Open 8,241,250.00 NV06B93 Kyle Canyon Detention Basin Closed 5,037,000.00 NV08B97 Lower Las Vegas Wash Det Basin Open 4,433,240.98 $46,037,316.64
Total Funded $213,488,039.65
-
60 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
RFCD OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL - 1999 UPDATE
- RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF (November 18,1999): Adopt the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual for 1999.
-- TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Approve. (November 18,1999)
- CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve. (November 29, 1999)
STAFF (October 20, 1999): Adopt the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual for 1999.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Hold for further study. (October 28, 1999)
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Hold for further study. (November 2,1999) -
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #05 DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY r? REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
RFCD OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL - 1999 UPDATE PETITIONER:
GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: - ADOPT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE RFCD OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
FISCAL IMPACT: None. - BACKGROUND: The District’s Operationand MaintenanceManual was last amendedJuly 13, 1995. It has been necessary since the 1995 revision to clarify some definitions, include new policies, revise the Annual Work Plan submissionschedule, and address emergency funding procedures.Changes were madethroughout the entire -- manual to addresschanges adopted in the Policies and ProceduresManual, Section 16.2 Catastrophic Damageto Flood Control Facilities (Board approved: 10/14/99). Staff has updatedForms and Charts to - reflect what is currently in use and to standardizethe usageof the MWP Facility Number, Facility Name, and Master Plan Facility ID. Sample forms were addedto support the existing requirementsof the Annual MaintenanceWork Plan submission. Staff has proposedchanges to the following sections: - Section 2.50 - Definitions Section 3.20 - Policies Section 4.11 - Purpose Section 4.22 - Annual Work Plans Section 4.25 - Certification of Compliance Section 4.34 - Scheduling -
Staff has also proposed the addition of Chapter 5, Emergency Funding Proceduresand corresponding sections. The changesare included in the backup for review and approval. -
Respectfully submitted,
Gale Wm. Fraser, II, P.E. Date: GeneralManager/Chief Engineer 1 o’2 8’??X399 OpemtionsManuaLitm - Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
-
L.. Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/29/99
.- RFCD OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL - 1999 Updates The proposed changes to the Operations and Maintenance are included in the backup as follows: - Section 2.50 - Definitions: Expanded the definition of Maintenance Program to reflect the overall program Also, moved the explanation of projects eligible for maintenance program funding to this section fron Section 4.11. Expanded the definition of Maintenance Program Exclusions to be consistent with change! - adopted in the Policies and Procedures Section 16.2 Catastrophic Damage to Flood Control Facilities (Boars approved: 10/14/99). Section 3.20 - Policies: Expanded the policies of Maintenance Program to be consistent with change: - adopted in the Policies and Procedures Section 16.2 Catastrophic Damage to Flood Control Facilities (Boars approved: 10/14/99). Added policy that stated, generally speaking, bridge structures are not eligible fol District funding unless the flood carrying aspects cause a safety or maintenance problem. - Section 4.11 - Purpose: Also, moved the explanation of projects eligible for maintenance program funding from this section to Section 2.50. -- Section 4.22 - Annual Work Plans: Changed tentative and final budget submittal dates to provide the Distric with information to assist the District’s Fiscal Year Budget submittal and request/approval process ant prioritization of maintenance funding. -- Section 4.25 - Certification of Compliance: Revised the reporting of the certification of the Maintenance Program to be included on the Final Accounting Report. _- 4 Section 4.34 - Scheduling: Expanded the objectives of work scheduling. Also, revised the Sample Work Calendar chart with Flood Control Activity numbers and descriptions.
- Chapter 5 - Emergency Funding Procedures: Added new Chapter to address changes adopted in the Policies and Procedures Section 16.2 Catastrophic Damage to Flood Control Facilities (Board approved: 10/14/99). Also, provided guidelines to process emergency purchase orders to the maximum limit of unexpended funds upon written request of the Entity. - Forms and Charts - Forms and Charts have been updated to reflect what is currently in use and to standardize the usage of MWP Facility Number, Facility Name, and Master Plan Facility ID. Added sample forms tc - support the existing requirements of the Annual Maintenance Work Plan submission. Staff Recommendation: Adopt the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual for 1999. - Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA #05 Date: 10/28/99 - The TAC held the item for further study. Recommendation: Hold for November 18,l999 meeting. .- Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #05 Date: 1 l/02/99 The CAC held the item for further study. Recommendation: Hold for November 29, 1999 meeting.
120999operationsmaint.aid Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT n
- Staff Discussion: 1 Date: 1 l/18/99 RFCD OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL - 1999 Updates - On October 28, 1999, the TACCAC held the item for further study. Comments submitted by the City ol Las Vegas were reviewed and discussed by TAC and CAC at their November monthly meetings. Staft modified the City’s comments and incorporated the changes into the proposed Operations and Maintenance Manual. - Staff Recommendation:
- Adopt the revised Operations and Maintenance Manual for 1999.
I - Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
-
.-
Recommendation: -
Approve. -
- Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:
-
-
Recommendation:
Approve.
120999operationsmaint pg2aid Page 2 Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual
2.50 DEFINITIONS
In addition to the definitions of terms and phrasesset forth in other District documents,the following apply to operationand maintenance:
Acceptancefor Maintenance: “Acceptancefor Maintenance”means that a project fundedby the District, Entity, or other public/privatefunds is a part of the Master Planand has been constructed in accordancewith District standardsand therefore eligible for maintenancefunding by the District.
Annual Budget: “Annual Budget”means the anticipatedcosts associated with completionof each activity outlined within the annualwork plan submittedby each of the Entities, and ultimately approvedby the District Board of Directors prior to the start of eachfiscal year.
Annual Work Plan: “Annual work Plan” meansa plan submittedby eachof the Entities setting forth the type and quantity of maintenanceto be performed during the ensuingbudget year in a . form prescribedby the District specificallyrequesting funds for budgetingpurposes.
Certification: “Certification” means the documentation which evidences that required maintenanceby an Entity has beencompleted in accordancewith establishedstandards.
-u Maintenance Program: The ‘Maintenance Program” has been establishedby the Board to provide funding of, and establishperformance standardsand guidelinesfor, the maintenance - of flood control facilities located throughout Clark County and the incorporatedareas. The Program providesfunding to entities to perform maintenanceof eligibleflood controlfacilities. Projects eligiblefor District maintenancefunding are those identified in the Regional Flood - Control District’s Master Plan and any revisions, amendments,and/or changessubsequently approved. Only those facilities that exist as Master Plan Facilities or exist in the same alignment as a proposed Master Plan facility, and appurtenant facilities are eligible. Subsequently,the District works with the entitiesannually to developMaintenance Work Plans.
the work plans x&vi&s undertakenthrough the - MaintenanceProgram and budgets are fundedm through the annualinterlocal contractsbetween each Entity and the District. No matchingfunds are required, exceptin those caseswhere an arrangementhas been made to cooperativelyfund a particular field activity. Work is performed using a combination of private contractors and entity maintenance staff. The MaintenanceProgram containsthree broad categoriesof work:
1. Routine and/orPreventive Maintenance: “Routine and/or Preventive Maintenance” meanswork on existing facilities to keep them in proper working conditions, includingbut not limited to, debris/sedimentationremoval, vegetativecontrol, and reshaping. ‘-d
e Amended: November 10, 1999 2-3 Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual f--l
2. Restoration: “Restoration”means the repair to existingfacilities after a storm event includingerosion repair, fencereplacement, repairing/replacing trash racks,inlets, storm sewersystems, major debrisremoval and similar “one time” work activity.
3. Rehabilitation: “Rehabilitation” meansrebuilding a facility and/or conveyance systemafter it is destroyedby an event or has beendetermined it is not operating according to the intent of the designdocuments on file at the LXstrict causinga safety or maintenanceproblem or has deterioratedto the extent that it must be replaced “in kind” including replacing or modifying drop structures, reshaping channels,bank protection restoration, inlets etc. In general, the rehabilitative
projects are designedby consultantsand the construction contractsare awarded e through a bid process.
MaintenanceProgram Exclusions: “Exclusions” typicallyinclude local drainagewaymaintenance suchas curb and gutter work, inlet maintenance,and repairsto smallpiped storm sewersystems, - unlessotherwise constructed as part of a regionalfacility. Maintenance work exclusionsalso include repair or replacementof existing flood control Master Plan facilities which undergo catastrophicdamage of more than one-half (%) mile. Thesetypes of catastrophicdamages will - generally be classified as capital improvements,and requestsfor capital improvementfunds must bereprogrammed as a capital improvementprojectin accordancewith District Policiesand Procedures. --
-
_-
v Amended: November 10, 1999 2-4 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
CHAPTER 3 POLICY STATEMENT
It is importantthat a maintenancepolicy statementbe adoptedwhich reflectsthe objectivesof both the electedofficials and the operationsstaff chargedwith its implementation. The initial policy document was prepared and reviewed by District staff and the Maintenance Committee. Following input from the group, it was reviewedby the respectivePublic Works Directors of all Entities and further revised to reflect their input. The documentwas then reviewed by the TechnicalAdvisory Committee(TAC) and the CitizensAdvisory Committee (CAC) before final adoptionby the Board on November 8, 1990. The final adoptedpolicy statementis as follows:
3.10 GOAL
Comply with the provisionsof NRS 543.340 (4) and assurethat facilities in the Master Plan are maintainedin a mannerthat maximizestheir useful life and ensurestheir operationat design capacityduring a storm event.
.-u 3.20 POLICIES 1. Floodcontrol facilities identified in the Master Plan are eligible for District maintenance funding.
2. As specified in the Uniform Regulationsfor the Control of Drainage Section 12.050, - facilities fundedthrough the District shallbe inspectedon an annualbasis to assureproper maintenancehas beenprovided.
- 3. In caseswhere fundedmaintenance by the lead Entity is not performed to the standards specified,the District shallperform or causeto be performed the maintenancenecessary to assureproper operationsof the facility. Costs incurredby the District shallbe deducted - from the amountauthorized in the maintenanceagreement between the leadEntity andthe District.
4. Flood control facilities improved or constructedafter adoption of this policy, must be designedin accordancewith District criteria and standardsto be eligiblefor maintenance funding.
-
Amended: November 10, 1999 3-l Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual
5. Accessto the facility must be guaranteedto the leadEntity and the District in order to be eligible for maintenancefunding. 6. The maintenancerequirements applied to thesefacilities shall be basedon the standards containedin the District’s Onerationsand MaintenanceManual.
7. The lead Entity must developan annualwork plan to be eligible for maintenancefunds. Upon completion of the work, the Entity must certify that the work was completedin accordancewith the standardscontained in the District’s Onerationsand Maintenance Manual.
8. Maintenance funding is available only for repair, restoration, rehabilitation, or maintenanceof existing facilities and is not intendedto supplementthe District’s capital improvement program. For example, if the intent of the field activity is to increasethe designedcapacity of a facility or conveyance,then that function is capital in nature. -
9. Expendituresfor repair and replacementof existingflood control Master Plan facilities which undergo catastrophic damageof one-half (%) mile or less will be classified as _ maintenance. Theseexpenditures will be madefrom funds budgetedin the Facilities MaintenanceFund.
10. Expendituresfor repair and replacementof existingflood control Master Plan facilities which undergo catastrophic damageof more than one-half (%) mile will generally be classified as capital improvements. Requestsfor capital improvementfunds must be - reprogrammedas a capital improvementproject in accordancewith District Policiesand Procedures.
11. Expendituresfor removalof debrisand sedimentcaptured or depositedin a debrisbasin, detention basin or a linear flood control facility will be classified as maintenance. - Necessaryrepairs to a debris or detentionbasin will also be classifiedas maintenance. Theseexpenditures will be madefrom funds budgetedin the Facilities Maintenance Fund.
12. Expendituresfor repair and replacementof non-improvedor “earth 1ined”flood control facilities and features will be classified as maintenance. Theseexpenditures will be madefrom funds budgetedin the Facilities MaintenanceFund.
13. An entity may consideranother option in lieu of repairing or rehabilitatingfacilities that have not been improved to Master Plan design specifications. This option is to build/implement the long-term solution for the damagedfacility. Expediting the implementationof the Master Plan may be a viable alternative that maximizes the use of available resources. This should be consideredas an alternative if the long-term
V Amended: November 10, 1999 3-2 Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual
solution can be implementedin a timely manner. Requestsfor capital improvement funds to implement a Master Plan project must be reprogrammed as a capital improvementproject in accordancewith District Policiesand Procedures.
14. All facilities eligible for maintenancefunding must be publicly owned.
15. Fundsmay be providedby the District for maintenanceof Master Planfacilities by outside contractors under conditions where the use of such an approachis deemedthe most efficient and cost effective by the lead Entity.
14. Bridge structures, generally speaking,are not eligiblefor District funding unlessit can be shown that the flood carrying aspectsof the regional facility causesa safety or maintenanceproblem.
-
-
-
-
‘-d v Amended: November 10. 1999 3-3 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
CHAPTER 4 PROCEDURES
4.10 FUNDING PROCEDURES
4.11 Purpose
This element of the Onerations and Maintenance Manual provides the Entities with procedures for the appropriation, expenditure and reimbursement of funds to perform maintenance activities. A principle role of the District shall be to manage and disburse payments to the Entities for maintenance that is performed in compliance with the approved plans. A diagram of the funding flow is shown on Figure 4-1.
The District has authorized funding to assist the Entities with major drainageway maintenance in accordance with the priorities listed below: -
1. First priority - District owned facilities. 2. Secondpriority - Facilities owned by other public agencies, but totally or partly ,--.- financed by District funds. (Capital Improvement and Maintenance Project) 3. Third priority - Facilities owned by others and constructed by others without - District assistance. 4. Fourth priority- Unimproved drainageways.
4.12 Payment Procedures
Payment for work performed will be made in accordance with the annual interlocal contract - executed as part of the approved work plan and the payment procedures outlined herein. The primary mechanism for reimbursements shall occur through a purchase order established between the District and each Entity. In cases where the Entity directs the District to make payments to a contractor or supplier directly, the purchase orders will be established between the District and the contractor, consultant, or supplier, at the Entity’s request. Unless otherwise contained within this manual, all District Policies and Procedures relating to disbursement of funds and reimbursement to Entities apply.
m 9 Amended: No-amber 10.1999 4-l Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual
4.20 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
4.21 Purpose
The purpose of this element of the Onerations and Maintenance Manual is to provide specific procedures for establishing standards and levels of service, preparing the annual work plan, administrating the planning, approval and enforcement elements, and updating the manual over time. The principal role of the District shall be to review and approve annual maintenance work plans and monitor the performance of work activities. The principal role of the Entities shall be development of annual work plans that are consistent with the District’s approved maintenance activity list; performance of the maintenance work set forth in the approved work plans; and the submittal of quarterly reports that summarize work performance while certifying compliance with maintenance activity performance standards as set forth in the Operations and Maintenance Manual.
4.22 Annual Work Plans
In accordance with the schedule on the following page, each Entity shall submit a proposed annual maintenance work plan containing the following components:
Section 1 Program Summary by Maintenance Project Including Cost for Each Project Section 2 Summary by Maintenance Activity Section 3 Individual Maintenance Projects Showing Narrative, Location Map, Work Activities, Results, Costs
District staff shall review the proposed plans and work with the Entities to resolve any discrepancies found with District maintenance standards and policy objectives. After the initial staff review, the plans shall be forwarded to the Technical Advisory Committee. Lastly, the plans will be incorporated in the annual District budget and submitted to the Board for final approval.
The activities in the work plan shall be consistent with the District’s approved activity list for maintenance of flood control and drainage facilities. Work plans should also describe locally funded work activities that may be linked to the District maintenance work activities to show overlapping areas of responsibility for personnel and equipment. Where local personnel and equipment are going to be used to perform both District funded activities and locally funded activities, the Entity will describe how these resources are to be managed and the procedures for tracking costs related to both sets of activities.
% d w 3 Amended: November 10. 1999 4-5 Clark County Regional Flood Control District - Operations and Maintenance Manual
Entities may contract for the performance of maintenance work activities. The proposed work plan must specify that a contractor is to be utilized and the time frame for selection of a contractor. In the event that maintenance work is performed under contract, the contract must specify that the District has the authority to inspect all work performed under the contract and approve or deny payments to contractors based on inspection findings. - All work performed must comply with District approved maintenance activity performance standards as set forth in subsequent sections of this Manual. The Entity is required to inspect Master Plan facilities annually, including any maintenance work performed by Entities on Master Plan - Facilities, and shall notify the District prior to the annual inspection of completed maintenance work. Entities shall facilitate the inspection of maintenance work by the District. The District may withhold funding, require additional maintenance work, or seek repayment of disbursed funds when an inspection reveals that work activities were not performed in conformance with activity performance standards.
Schedule - February 1 - Submittal of preliminary work plan proposal and tentative budget to District staff for review, recommendations, and coordination with entities. This is important for the following reasons: 1) Fiscal Year Budget Authority submittal and approval. 2) Prioritization of maintenance funding activities. April1 - Submittal of tentative annual work plans, budgets and interlocal contracts to District staff for review, recommendations, and coordination with entities.
May - Submittal of the Entities’ final annual work plans, budgets, and (TAC deadline) interlocal contracts to the TAC, and CAC for approval. June - Afier receiving approval from the TAC and CAC, entities’final annual workplans, budgets, and interlocal contracts are submitted to the Board for approval. July 1 - Beginning of maintenance plan contract period, which ends June 30.
Reporting
Each Entity will submit quarterly reports indicating the status of the work completed under the current fiscal year’s program (Figure 4-3). The reports are due 30 days after the close of the - -. w Amended: November 10.1999 4-6 Clark County Regional Flood Contrd District Operations and Maintenance Manual quarter, and will be submitted to the Board for review. Also, each Entity shall submit an annual certification to the District stating that all work contained in the work plan and reimbursed through the interlocal contract has been performed to the specifications established in this manual.
v Amended: November 10.1999 4-7 Clark County Regional Flcmd Control District - Operations and Maintenance Manual
Reporting
Annual certification of results will include addressing all amendments made to the annual work plan.
4.25 Certification of Compliance
It is the intent of the District to rely to the maximum extent possible on the Entities to carry out the maintenance activities and comply “voluntarily” with the procedures and standards set forth in this manual. The District shall from time to time inspect facilities funded by the District or those on the Master Plan to assure compliance with the interlocal contract. Each Entity shall submit an annual certification to the District stating that all work contained in the work plan and reimbursed through the interlocal contract has been performed to the specifications established in this manual. This certification shall be signed by the person executing the interlocal contract or designee. The certification should summarize proposed and actual plan accomplishments. It should also describe any major maintenance problems that have implications for the District as a whole, such as significant deterioration of major conveyance system components, or the failure of system components to perform as intended, and suggest revisions to the activity list provisions.
Schedule -- The certification and final payment requests shall be submitted to the District within 30 calendar days of the termination of the annual interlocal contract for maintenance funding. -
Reporting
The certification shall be t attested to on the Final Accounting Report (Figure 4-4) and attachment may be used to describe additional inform&ion.
m 1 Amended: November 10. 1999 4-10 Clark County Regional Flood Control District Operations and Maintenance Manual
Use of Performance Standards
Maintenance supervisory personnel should become thoroughly familiar with these performance standards. It is important that the performance standards be used when making assignments and performing work. Some situations will require deviation from the performance standards--such as more or less flagmen or additional haul trucks. These situations are recognized, and crew leaders are expected to consider such situations when organizing and managing their activities.
Haul truck needs should be determined using factors such as haul distance and time estimates (spot, dump, load, and cycle times.)
The performance standards also provide guidance and a measure for supervisors to use when evaluating work in progress and completed.
Field personnel are in the best position to identify new or better work methods or difficulties with the current performance standards. These suggestions for improvements or questions should be directed to the crew leader or supervisor.
The performance standards should be reviewed and updated annually. If other changes occur that require more frequent review and update or development, the performance standardscan be changed to suit these needs.
4.34 Scheduling
The objectives of work scheduling are:
0 To do the planned amount of work. 0 To perform the work when it should be done. 0 To do the work where it should be done. . l To use the proper people, equipment and supplies to do the work. - 0 To ensureto the extentpossible that all flood controlfacilities arefunctioning at design capacity during a storm event, noting that Flash Flood Seasonis July through September. -
Three tools are available to help supervisors meet these objectives. The WORK PROGRAM defines the estimated amount of work and the estimated labor-days required for each activity to provide the desired levels of service; a WORK CALENDAR helps to establish when the various activities should be done; and the PERFORMANCE STANDARDS provide information about quantity standards, personnel requirements and how much work can be done in a given time.
- .> m , Amended: November 10.1999 4-17 Clark County Regional Flood Control District ,- Operations and Maintenance Manual
The annual work program establishes the kinds and amount of work to be done during the year and the resources that will be required to do that work. This annual plan needs to be broken into a monthly plan for effective scheduling of work and to permit timely evaluations of work program performance.
The process of “distributing” the annual work load throughout the year is done by allocating a part _ of the work (in labor-hours, by activity) to specific months. Some types of work -- emergency or service activities -- must be done throughout the year as the need arises. Other types of work must be done on a regularly scheduled basis -- such as preventive maintenance work. Finally, some types of work can be done during certain periods but can be shifted from one month to the other, and still other work can be done almost any time during the year.
These factors must be -considered when distributing the different types of work. Preventive maintenance and other types of work which must be performed on a regularly scheduled basis are distributed so as to level labor power needs as much as possible. Finally, work which can be performed any time is distributed to those months with the fewest labor-days. In this way, staffing needs are kept as uniform as possible resulting in more efficient use of available labor power. -. A work calendar lists -- activity by activity -- the labor-hours for each month. These labor-hours are used in conjunction with the work program annual work quantities for work scheduling and the preparation of periodic Activity Status Reports. A sample work calendar is included on Figure 4-5. --
Once the work program and staffing levels have been set, the work load distribution can be finalized and the calendar prepared to summarize/communicate the planned monthly distribution of the work program.
Work scheduling is the process of using the Work Calendar and specific scheduling procedures to plan ahead, establish work priorities and accomplish the work.
The performance standards outlined in the previous sections apply to corrective and preventive maintenance activities. These procedures are not as rigid or foolproof as implied by the description. Equipment breakdowns, emergencies, or bad weather will disrupt a schedule -- but part of the scheduling process is to be aware that these situations will occur and to be prepared to respond with little or no difficulty. Because of these situations, supervisors should not expect to accomplish all of the work as scheduled. Generally, a supervisor can consider his scheduling efforts to be successful if 75 to 80 percent of the scheduled work is completed as planned.
4-18 m 3 Amended: November 10.1999 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL
CHAPTER 5 EMERGENCY FUNDING PROCEDURES
5.10 EMERGENCY FUNDING PROCEDURES
5.11 Purpose
This element of the Operations and Maintenance Manual provides the Entities with procedures to perform emergency restoration and rehabilitation immediately following a flood event. A principal role of the District shall be to support the Entities’ efforts to: (I) secure funding from state, federal, entity reserves andprivate sources; and (2) facilitate required immediate repairs to regional flood control facilities without delay.
Projects eligible for District emergency restoration and rehabilitation funding are those included in the Entity’s approved or amended Maintenance Work Program.
5.12 Procedures
If the governing body elects to declare an emergency, then the District, in accordance with NRS 332.055 (Emergency Contracts: Competitive bidding not required; “emergency” defined.), will authorize and process emergency purchase orders to the maximum limit of unexpended funds upon written request of the Entity.
Adopted: November 10, 1999 5-l - CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT f---X OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL -
LIST OF FIGURES -
Figure No. Description :’ - 4-l Funding Flow Diagram (No Changes - Not Included)
4-2 Disbursement / Amended Budget Request -
4-3 Quarterly Status Report - 4-4 Final Accounting Report - 4-5 Sample Work Calendar
4-6 Daily Work Activity Report - C-l Maintenance Work Plan Summary .n- c-2 Maintenance Work Program Annual Budget
-
.. . -Amended: . November 10,1999 .lu I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RE&( 41 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT EAGtHMS i ENTITY: MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 20Xx-Xx ( ) Disbursement Request ( ) Amended Annual Budget Request Vendor Name: Invoice Number: Approved: Amount Requested: General Manager/Chief Engineer Date RFCD Purchase Order #: Clark County Regional Flood Control District
MWP Facility #:
Facility Name: Master Plan ACTIVITY TOTAL Facility ID: 05-Chnl lnsp 0.00 1 O-Reshape Chnl 0.00 15-Chnl Repair 0.00
55-Clean In/Outlet
85-Engr 0.00 FaciMy Total 0.00 I certify that the above described maintenance was/ w///be performed In accordance with the criteria/standards contained In the District’s Operations and Maintenance Manual. Further, the information contained in this m Request accurately reflects those costs incurred/ to be incuned during the performance of this work.
Project Manager Date REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT - FY 20Xx-xX
MWP Facility #: Entity: Fbcdi~ Name: Date Prepared: MP Facilify ID: Quarfec
Force Approved Amended Schedule, Expended Percent Account/ Activity Work Plan Work Plan Completior To Date ($) Complete Contract Amount ($) Amount ($) Date -
5 Inspect Channels 10 Clean and Reshape Channels 15 Repair Lined Channel 20 Provide/Maintain Erosion Control 25 Clean & Inspect DetentionDebris Basir 30 Erosion Repair 35 Fence Repair 40 Vegetation Control - Chemical 45 Vegetation Control - Mechanical 50 Maintain Access Road 55 Clean & Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures 60 Repair Inlet/Outlet Structures 65 Clean Storm Sewer Lines 70 Storm Sewer Repair 75 Clean/Ftush Culverts & Bridges 80 Miscellaneous Work Activities - 85 Engineering TOTAL! so belays 01 roblem Areas:
lark Completed During Current Quarter:
Vork to be Completed during Next Quarter: I
Consultant/ Contractor: Project Manager: Phone Number:
Figure 4-3 Quarterly StatusReport - (Entity) FY 20xX-XX MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM FINAL ACCOUNTING REPORT - As of (Current Date) L- P.O. P.O. TOTAL P.O. -- VENDOR NUMBER AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE
- Sample Vendor 1 123456 01 1 ,ooo.oo 1 ,ooo.oo 0.00 Sample Vendor 2 123456 02 1 ,ooo.oo 500.00 500.00 Sample Vendor 3 123456 03 1 ,ooo.oo 200.00 800.00
Total $3,000 $1,700 $1,300
-
FY XX-XX INTERLOCAL AMOUNT/BUDGET 4,ooo.oo Total Encumbered 3,ooo.oo Total Encumbered 3,ooo.oo Total Expended 1,700.00
- Total Unencumbered $1 ,ooo.oo Total Unexpended $1,300.00
I 4
- Total Authorized $4,000.00 Expended $1,700.00 - RETURN TO FUND 288 $2,300.00
-
Clark County Regional Flood Control District (Entity)
RFCD Date Project Manager Date - I certify that the above described maintenance was performed in accordance with the criteria/standards contained in the Districts Operations and Maintenance Manual. Further, the information contained in this Final Accounting Report accurately reflects those costs incurred during the performance of this work. If there are any maintenance problems that have implications for the District as - a whole, such as significant deterioration of major conveyence system components or failure of system components to perform as intended, a detailed description will accompany this report as an attachment.
mwpclose.xls Date Figure 4-4 Final Accounting Report REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM WORK CALENDAR
MWP Facility #: Entity: Facility Name: Fiscal Year: MP Facility ID: Date Prepared:
L AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
if z r e g
; tr & 70 Storm Sewer Repair g 75 Clean/Flush Culverts & Bridges 80 Miscellaneous Work Activities 85 Engineering Total Per Month I certiv that the above described maintenance will be performed in accordance with the criteria/standards contained in the District’s Operations and Maintenance Manual. Further the information contained in this Work Calendar accurately reflects the time expected to be incurred during the performance of this work.
Project Manager Date \
I I I I I I ! I I I I I
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ENTITY: DAILY WORK ACTIVITY REPORT
Date Work Performed: 20- Employee Name: No.
Supervisor Name: Employee Name: No.
Employee Name: No.
Employee Name: No.
Employee Name: No.
Hours Accomplishment Worked Equip. MWP Master Plan Facility Activity Empl. Work Performance Facility Number Number ID Number by (Location, Brief Description, Materials Used, Etc.) Amount Unit of Number Worked Activity Used Measure
NOTES/COMMENTS:
The undersigned hereby certifies that the above described maintenance was performed in accordance with the criteria/standards contained in the District’s Operations and Maintenance Manual. further, the information contained herein accurately reflects the time and accomplishments reported during the performance of this work. Page- of - Supervisor’s Signature Date Title L
(Entity) r- Clark County Regional Flood Control District - Fiscal Year 20xX-Xx Maintenance Work Plan Summary -
-
-
-
--
-
Figure C-l Maintenance Work Plan Summary REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM ANNUAL BUDGET - FY POXX-XX
-- MWP Facility #: Entity: Facility Name: Date Prepared: MP Facilitv ID:
Force Approved Amended Scheduled Percent Account/ Activity Work Plan Work Plan Completion Complete Contract Amount (S) Amount ($) Date
5 Inspect Channels 10 Clean and Reshape Channels 15 Repair Lined Channel 20 Provide/Maintain Erosion Control 25 Clean & Inspect DetentionDebris Basins 30 Erosion Repair 35 Fence Repair 40 Vegetation Control - Chemical 45 Vegetation Control - Mechanical 50 Maintain Access Road 55 Clean & Inspect Inlet/Outlet Structures 60 Repair Inlet/Outlet Structures - 65 Clean Storm Sewer Lines 70 Storm Sewer Repair 75 Clean/Flush Culverts & Bridges - 80 Miscellaneous Work Activities 85 Engineering
Delays roblem Areas:
work Completed During Current Quarter:
lNork to be Completed during Next Quarter:
-
Consultant/ - Contractor: b IT--!-rrojecr -I Manager: Phone Number:
Figure C-2 Maintenance Work Program Annual Budget CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT c
.- AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: - TROPICANA WASH, PARADISE ROAD TO KOVAL LANE - REALLOCATION
- (CLA. 10.A.97)
- RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
- STAFF: Approve.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Approve.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve.
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #06 DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
TROPICANA WASH, PARADISE ROAD TO KOVAL LANE PETITIONER:
M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: -
THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE REQUESTTO REDISTRIBUTE FUNDING IN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR TROPICANA - WASH, PARADISE ROAD TO KOVAL LANE.
FISCAL IMPACT: -
None. -.- BACKGROUND:
On August 21, 1997, the District enteredinto an interlocal contract with Clark County in the - amount of $240,000.00to provide for designand right-of-way engineeringfor the Tropicana Wash, ParadiseRoad to Koval Lane project. -
This requestwill allow for the redistribution of funds in the interlocalcontract as follows: CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDING FUNDING CLOMR andLOMR $ 1o,ooo.oo $ 10,000.00 Right-of-Way Other $ 1o,ooo.oo $ 1,ooo.oo DesignEngineering $220.000.00 $229.000.00 Total InterlocalContract Value $240,000.00 $240,000.00 Theredistribution of funds is necessaryto increasethe cost of designengineering and decrease the costof right-of-way other. Right-of-way engineeringis completeand the County desiressufficient designfunding while the project is underconstruction.
Respectfully submitted,
‘f
MJM:CB:mcc - Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: 1 Date: 1 l/08/99 TROPICANA WASH, PARADISE ROAD TO KOVAL LANE - REALLOCATION (CLA. lO.A.97)
Clark County has submitted a request to reallocate funds within the current interlocal contract. N additional funds are being requested. Funding will be provided as follows:
Proposed Funding Current Funding
Design Engineering $229,000 $220,000 Right-of-way Engineering 1,000 10,000 LOMR 10,000 10,000 Total ILC Value $240,000 $240,000 IStaff Recommendation: I Approve. Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA I #08 Date: 1l/18/99 IRecommendation: I Approve.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I 1 #08 :?%99 IRecommendation: I Approve. 120999clalOa97.aid CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE AWARD OF BID FOR THE WASHINGTON AVENUE CHANNEL - VETERANS MEMORIAL DRIVE TO UPRR (LAS.09.N.99)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Receive the report.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Receive the report.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Receive the report.
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #07 DATE: 12/09/99 --
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT c? AGENDA ITEM
AWARD OF BID - WASHINGTON AVENUE CHANNEL FROM VETERAN’S -
-
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AWARD OF BID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WASHINGTON AVENUE CHANNEL FROM VETERAN’S MEMORIAL TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD (WAPR 0000) TO THE BEST BIDDER, WELLS CARGO, INC.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None by this action.
BACKGROUND:
On October 12, 1999 at 3:30 p.m., bids for the construction of improvements for the Washington Avenue Channel from Veteran’s Memorial to Union Pacific Railroad were opened in the City of Las Vegas office of Purchasing and Contracts. Three bids were received ranging from $5590,921 to $7,131,000. The best bidder, in the amount of $5,590,921 was Wells Cargo, Inc. In addition to the best bid amount, about $999,000 is needed for work to be done at the crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad. The Interlocal contract dated April 8, 1999, between the District and the City of Las Vegas, allocates $6,590,000 for construction of this project which would - allow this extra work to be done. A bid abstract is attached.
. Department of Public Works * Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 1l/08/99 RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE AWARD OF BID FOR THE WASHINGTON AVENUE CHANNEL VETERANS MEMORIAL DRIVE TO UPRR (LAS.09.N.99)
On October 12,1999the City of Las Vegasopened bids for constructionof WashingtonAvenue Charm from Veteran’s Memorial Drive to UPRR. Three bids were received,ranging from an apparentlow bi of $5,590,921to $7,131,000. The City evaluatedbids, and awarded a contract to Wells Cargo in tb amount of $5,590,921. Bid tabulationsare included in the backup.
Staff Recommendation: IReceive the report. Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: j ##09;::%h99 -
Recommendation:
Receivethe report.
Recommendation:
Receivethe report.
/ 120999&09n99-bid-aid BID NUMBER 00.1730.11-RC UPPER WASHINGTON AVENUE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM PHASE 2 Wells t 5rgo Inc. Las Veg asPaving i- Kiewitt Western Co. DESCRIPTION - EXTENDED EXTENDED ITEM # QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMT UNIT PRICE EiXTENDED AMT UNIT PRICE AMT 200.01 Mobilization and Demobilization ‘- L-S- p-1 $ 122.000.00 $ 122,d00.66 s 130.000.00 s 130,000.00 5 291,335.oo 5 291,335.oo 202.01 Removal of Curb & Gutter LF 368 s 2.30 5 846.40 5~ 3.00 § 1,~04.00 5 4.00 5 1,472.OO 202.02 Removal of Asphaltic Pavement SY 12326 5 2.15 $ 26.500.90 5 3.00 b 36,978.OO $ 4.00 $ 49,304.oo 202.03 Removal of Pork Chop Median Island SF 3531 s 2.70 5 9,533.70 5 2.00 k 7 ~062100 5 2.00 5 7,062.OO 202.04 Removal of Storm Drain Pipe LF 290 s 5.55 5 1,609.50 5 -15.69 5. 4,350.oo 5 30.00 5 8.700.00 IRemoval and Salvage Streetlight I I 5 550.00 5 550.00 5 1 ,ooo.oo 5 1 ,ooo.oo 5 3,ooo.oo 5 3,ooo.oo $ 7.60 5 836.00. s 3.00 5 330.00 5~ 25.00 .I 5 2,750.OO A 5 390.00 $ ‘360.~ 5 500.00 5 2,ooo.oo 5 2,2”0.00 5 8,8oo.o0 20 5 27.00 5 540.00 5 50.00 5 .- 1,ooo.oo 5 150.00 I-5 3,ooo.oo 809 5 2.50 $ I,52260 5 3.00 5 1,827.OO $ 5.00 5 3,045.oo 109 5 56.00 5 6104.00 5 10.00 5 1,090.00 5 30.00 5 3.270.00
5 43,315.06 $ 43,315.oo 5 15,ooo.oo 5 15.000.00 $ ?~,pJ?O $ 20,000.00 $ 4,614.OO 5 4614.00 s.-....--!!!4?00lo0 5 10,000.00- $- 20,000.00 5 20,000.00 5 323.00 $ 20,026.99 5 200.00 5 12,400.OO 5 300.00 $ 18.600.00 5. 3.15 5 5,421.15 5- 4.00 5 6,884.OO 5-0.30 5 516.30 5 O.SO $ 1,132.OO 5 2.00 5 2,830.OO $ 1.50 $ 2,122.50 5 190.00 5 5,700.oo $ 20.00 $ 600.00 5 50.00 $ 1,500.00 5 610.00 5 610.00 5 500.00 5 500.00 5 1,200.00 5 1,200.00 5 11.00 5 220.00 5 50.00 5 1.0b0.0d 5 100.00 5 2.000.00 5 2.70 $ 2,068.20 5 2.00 $ 1.532.00 5 6.00 $ 4,596.OO~~ Remove Concrete Lined Channel & Cutoff 202.20 walls (sta 129+94 to 130+29) LS 1 $ 1,405.oo 5 1,405.oo 5 10.000.00 5 10,000.00 $ 2.500.00 --.-...?~?!O.OO5 202.21 Removal offFon%teP&ement SF 4500 5 1.20 5 5,400.oo 5 2.00 5 9,ooo.oo 5 2.00 5 9,ooo.oo 202.22 Rotomill4-Inches of Asphaltic Pavement SY 12300 5 2.45 $ 30,135.oo 5 4.00 5 49,200.oo $ 3.00 5 36,900.OO 202.23 Removal of Sidewalk &mp EA 29 $ 131.00 5 -“,7cJ9.00 5 50.00 s 1,450.oo 5~ -- 450.00 $ 13.059.00 206.01 OverexcavationlBacktill CY 4500 5 31.30 $ 140.850.00 5 10.00 $ 45,ooo.oo 5 45.06 5 202.500.00 Removal and Restoration of Landscaping -t- 212.01 (Bonanza and Main) LS 1 $ 16.500.00 $ 16.500.00 5 7,ooo.oo $ 7.000.00 $ 12.000.00 5 12,ooo.oo Removal and Restoration of Landscaping 212.02 (Veterans Memorial to Bonanza) LS 1 $ 11 ,ooo.oo $ !yPO 5 5.000.00 5 5.000.00 5 6,000.20 5-_ 6.000.20 302.01 Type II Aggregage Base CY 3457 5 33.25 5, 1!4,945.25~ g+ : , .-, ,-- 15.00~8.00 5 51,85560 5 22.00 5 76,054.OO 402.01 4-Inch Plantmix Bituminous Surfa~~~~ ------SY-- 25463 5 6.30 $ 160,416.99- $ 203,704.OO 5 10.00 5 254.630.00 3.534.60 5 20.60 402.02 8-Inch Plantmix Bituminous Surface SY 258 5 13.70 5 5-----~!!!!!!!~ 5 30.00 1 5 7,740.oo Plantmix MiscellanousAreas(Median~~~~~~(~~~~n 402.03 Surfaces) SF 3621 5 2.50 5 9.‘.. 952.50 - ~~ 5 2.00 5 7,242.OO 5 1 .oo 5 3,621 .OO 3/4-inch Plantmix Bituminous Surface ------I.- -- -I ------403.01 Open-Grade SY 21349 5 1.75 $ 37,360.75 $ 2.00 5 42,698.OO 5 3.00 $ 64,047.OO Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (Single 502.01 12’~ 8’) LF 190 $ 1,755.oo 5 333.450.00 5 1.820.00 5 345.800.00 --5 3300.00 $ 380.000.00 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (Single -I- 502.02 14’ x F) LF 2204 $ 1,200.00 5 2,644,800.00 5 1,425.OO 5 3,140,700.00 5 . . . ..!!350!!? 5 2.975.400.00 ReinforcedConcrete-~~tCulveR(Single -t 502.03 16’ x 8’) LF 115 $ I,97500 $ 227,125.OO 5 2,330.OO 5 267,950.OO $ 2,500.OO 5 287,500.OO Reinrorced-Concr~-~~i~~~ (Do;;bje .. -- ---. 502.04 9’ x 8’) LF 122 $ 1,225.OO 5 149,450.oo 5 1.230.00 $ 150.060.00 5 2,ooo.oo 5 244,690.OO 502.05 Reinforced Concrete Tran~ionS%t&~~ LF 157 $ 1,500.00 $ 235.500.00 $ ;,460.09 $-. 229,220.oo.~. 5 2,800.OO 5 439,800.OO 502.08 Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall LF 2c 5 230.00 5 4.600.00 5 ~200.00 5 ..- .!J!!?!?!!. 5 200.00 5 4,ooo.oo 502.07 Reinforced.Concrete Outi~tstructurs----. -- Em-- 1 $ 55,ooo.oo 5 55,ooo.oo 5 54.000.00 $ 54,ooo.oo $ 150,000.00 5 150,000.00 592.68 Reinfo;cedConcretesplitterStructure---~~~ LS. .- 1 $ 390.000.00 5 390,000.0d- 5 333,ooo.oo 5 333,ooo.oo 5 -~613,009.00 $ 613,900.OO Reinforced Concrete 8-foot Connection -.- $ 10.0’ $ 10,000.00 5 10,000.00 5 10,000.00 5 25,OOO.OO j I 17 P I nn I 1 m i I on lnnn r I 6nr II I UPPER WASHINGTON AVENt JVEYANCE SYSTEM PHASE 2
I rgo Inc. Las Veg: 1S Paving l- Kiewitt VI stern Co. DESCRIPTION EXTENDED EXTENDED lTEM# 1 ]uNII AMT UNIT PRICE E:XTENDED AMT UNIT PRICE AMT 603.01 118” RCP (Class Ill) or equivalent 125 $ 162.00 $ 20,250.OO $ 200.00 I $ 25,OOO.OO $ 300.00 $ 37,500.oo 603.02 24” RCP (Class Ill) or equivalent LF 25 $ 72.00 $ 1,800.OO $ 225.00 I.s 5,625.OO s 200.00 $ 5,ooo.oo 603.03 36” RCP (Class III) or equivalent LF 336 $ 230.00 $ 77,280.OO $ 237.00 $ 79,632.OO $ 150.00 $ 50.400.00 603.04 42” RCP (Class Ill) or equivalent LF 86 $ 236.00 $ 23296.00 $ 250.00 $ 21,500.00 $ 300.00 $ 25,800.OO 609.01 RCB Manhole- EA -- 5 $ 2,835.OO $ 14,175.oo $ 2.000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 2,ooo.oo $ 10,000.00 609.02 Reconstruct Manhole Base EA 1 $ 2,020.oo $ 2,020.oo $ 3,ooo.oo i- $ 3.000.00 3 750.00 $ 750.00 609.03 NDOT Pipe Riser Inlet EA 2 $ 2,800.OO $ 5,600.OO $ 1.900.00 $ 3.800.00 $ 2.500.00 $ 5.000.00 609.04 NDOT Tvoe.r- 3 Droo-r inlet-- EA 2 $ 4,880.OO $- 9,760.OO $ 4,250.OO $ 8,500.OO $-~ 5.000.00 $ 10,000.00 609.d5 /7-Foot bJDOT TVDe 11 Droo Inlet 2 $ 7,300.oo $ 14,600.OO $ 7,ooo.oo $ 1~,000.00 $ 8,6CIJJ~ $ 16,99!9. 2 $ 29,2oo.o~~ By 58.4OO.Oq$ 34,ooo.oo $ 68.000.00 $ 28,000.00~ $ 56,OOO.OO 5$ 970.00 $ 4,850.OO $ 750.00 $ 3,750.oo $ 500.00 $ 2,500.OO 2 $ 1,890.OO .-$ 3.780.00 $ 2 000.00 $ 4.000.00 % 500.00 s 1 ,ooo.oo 1 $ 7,125.OO $ 7.125.00 s ~‘--~14.000.00, $ 14.000.00 $ 7,ooo.oo $ 7,ooo.oo 643 $ 16.00 $ 10,288.OO $ 16.00 $ 10,288.OO $ 15.00 _~~$ --E.00 4374 $ 3.00 $ 13.122.00 $ 3.00 $ 13.122.00 $ 3.00 $ 13.122.00 168 $ 6.00 $ 1.008.00 .~$ ~~~ ~~~ 10.00..--. $ 1,680.OO $ 6.00 $ 1,008.OO 2960 $ 4.50 $ 13,320.06 $ 3.00 $ 8.880.00~ $ 5.06 $ 14,800.OO Remove and Replace Existing Commercial 220 $ 7.25 $ 1,595.oo $ 8.00 $ 1,760.~. $ 10.00 $ 2.200.00 33 $ ‘?75:!! $ 45.37560 s 20.00 $ 660.00 $ 1 ,ooo.oo 3 33,ooo.oo 652 $ 7.15 $ 46”: .80 $ 5.00 $ 3,260.OO s 5.00 $ 3,260:OO 18 S 4.90 $ 88:20 $ 40.00 $ 726.00 $ 20.00 $ 360.00 726 $ 6.30 $ 4,573.80 8 8.00 t-s 5,808.OO s 6.00 $ 4.356.00 375 $ 21.00 s 7.87500 $ 21 .oo t $ 7,875.60 $ 17.00 $ 6!375.00 616.02 W.C-Posts _ LF 340 $ 24.00 $ 8.160.00 $ 24.00 $ 8,160.OO $ 17.00 $ 5,780.OO 2 .s.- ! !E!?O $ 2,970.oo $ 11500.0~ $ 3,ooo.oo $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.OO Removal and Reconstruction of Existing 616.04 CMU UPRR Property Wall LF 60 $ 87.00 $ 5,220.OO $ 135.00 $ 8,lOO.OO $ 220.00 $ 13,200.OO Removal and Restoration of Existing 616.05 Chain-Link Fence Main St. Station LF 160 $ 52.00 __.S -!.??Ei! $ 52.00 t 8,320.OO $ 35.00 $ 5,600.OO 616.06 Restoration of Existing Iron Fence LF 109 $ 23.00 $ 2,507.OO $ 25.00 1. $ 2,725.OO $ 25.00 $ 2,725.OO Removal and Replacement of CMU Wall 616.07 near Bonanza Road LF 36 $ -. ~. 150.00-. $ 5.400.00 $ 4,860.OO $ 135.00 $ 4,860.oo Removal and Replacement of 4’ High 616.08 Fence and Gate LF 20 $ 93.00 $ 1,860.OO $ 2,ooo.oo $ 50.00 $ 1,000.00 621.01 Monuments EA 7 s.-_. 38?E $ 2~~00 $ 3,500.oo $ 500.00 $ 3,500.oo 622.01 Construction Survey by Contractor LS -- I $ 16,475.OO 3 16,475.OO $ 20,000.96 $ 25,OOO.OO $ 25,OOO.OO Replacement of Existing Streetlight 623.01 Assembly EA 1 $ 4,650.OO $ 4,650.OO $ 4,700.oo $ 5,ooo.oo $ 5,000.06 Traffic Modifications @ Main 623.02 Street/Bonanza Road Intersection LS 1 $ 86,520.OO $ 86,520.OO $ 86,600.OO $ 80,OOO.OO $ 80,OOO.OO Maintain and Restore Streetlights/Main 623.03 Street Station Parking Lot LS I $ 6,500.OO $ 6,500.OO $ 6,500.OO I$ 6,500.OO $ 6.500.00 $ 6.500.00 623.04 Replacement of 6’ X 6’ Induction loops EA 43 $ 275.00 $ Ii,82500 $ 275.00 s I! /g..~ $ 300.00 $ 12.900.00 Remove and Replace Existing Traffic 2 $ 1,430.oo $ 2,860.OC $ 1,450.oo $ 2,900.oo $ 1.400.00 $ 2.800.00 Replace Pedestrian Push Button Assembly with ADA Push Button 623 06 EA 88 276.00 $ 2,208.OC $ 300.00 $ 2,400.OO $ 300.00 $ 2,400.OO 1 $ 1.760.00 s J,‘~O.OC $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 1.700.00 $ . ..-x!vJ 1 $ 72,880.OO $ 72.88O.OC $ 73,ooo.oo 5 7pp0.00 $ 125.000.00 $ 125,OOO.bO 260 $ 138.00 $ 35.88O.OC $ 140.00 $ 36,406.Oo $ 125.06 $ 32,500.OO $ 7,150.oc $ 30.00 $ 7.800.06 $ 30.00 $ 7,800.OO $ 968.OC $ 125.00 $ 1.000.00 $ 600.00 s 4,800.OO BID NUMBER 00.1730.11-RC UPPER WASHINGTON AVENUE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM PHASE 2
ergo Inc. Kiewitt VI stern Co. DESCRIPTION EXTENDED EXTENDED ITEM # AMT UNIT PRICE AMT Remove and Replace Existing 627.02 Advertisement Sign 2 5 6,121.OO $ 16,242.OO $ 3,ooo.oo 5 6.000.00 628.01 Type 1 Film for Crosswalks and Stop Bars 1166 $ --5.66 5 6,641.60 $ 6.00 ?,I 16.66 . . 6?8.02 TypelFilm~o~o~i~--~~~ -~~--. .-. I 5 65 150.00~ 5- 900.00 $ 230.00 5 1.380.00 628.03 Type 1 Film for “ARROW is $ 156.00 s 2,250.OO $ 230.00 5 3.450.00 628.04 Paint Median l&nd 256. 5 1.10 $ 275.00 $ 5.00 s 1.250.00 Maintain and Restore Pavement 628.05 Markings/Main Street Station Parking 5 750.00 - 5 2,ooo.oo 5 2,ooo.oo 5 4,320.OO c 5 300.00 $ 2,700.OO 629.02 36” Steel Pipe (35000 psi Yield) 3 26600.00 5 1.200.00 5 67,200.OO 629.03 Remove and Replace 8-Inch Water Main $ 10,750.00 5 105.00 5 5,250.OO 629.04 Vertically Adjust Water Meter Box $ 260.00 5 250.00 ---____$ 250.00 630.01 6-inch PVC Sanitary Sewer Main 5 5,500.oo a 150.00 $ 16,500.OO 630.02 4-foot Diameter Sewer Manhole 5 7,100.00 5 1,500.00 5 3,ooo.oo Replace Ex Sewer M.H. W/S-Foot 630.03 Diameter Sewer Manhole 1 8 2,910.OO 5 2,910.OO $ 20.000.00 Relocate Existing 8” Sewer ( Main Street 630.04 Station Casino) 50 $ 29.00 5 1,450.oo $ ~. 100.00 $ poo.00 $ 100.00 $ 5,ooo.oo 633.01 Pavement Marker Non-Reflective 1625 $ 1.30 5 2,.1 Ii.56 5 2.00 $ 3,25O.C% $ 5.00 5 8.125.00 485 $ 2.40 % 1,164.60 s 3.00 $ 1.455.00 .-.5 5.00 5 2,425.OO Total Amount f 5,590,920.85 .-I- $ 5,934,827.00 $7,131,002.00 Corr total $5,590,908.25
STATE OF NV CONTdACTOR’S I 273 5507 20755 ’ AIB AB AB UNLIMITED UNLIMITED UNLIMITED
YES YES
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES_.. YES YES YES YES YES YES YES r ~~-----~ 1.. .I.---- I I J.-._ -- _.~ _ TO: Richard D. Goecke, Public Works D- xtor. Please review and furnish recommendation for award prior tC ~~~~award on 1 l-l 7-99 .
WE RECOMMEND Wells Cargo Inc. FOR AWARD OF BID # 00.1730.1 I-RC
Department/Division Signature Date
\ _-
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT - NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT - TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT (COE.G2.94)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Receive the report.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Receive the report.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Receive the report. CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT PETITIONER:
M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 9 WITH CLARK COUNTY ON THE TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
- Clark County and the Regional Flood Control District entered into a Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) with the Army Corps of Engineers(COE) for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washesproject which specifiesthe types of improvementsthat are eligible for cost participation by the COE and thosetypes of constructionthat are consideredcreditable as participationby the local sponsors.Clark County hasreceived bids for the relocationof utilities in DecaturBoulevard for the FlamingoDiversion Channel. The bestbid receivedexceeds the amountprovided in the - interlocalcontract for this item of work.
This interlocal contract provides additional funding for the COUNTY for construction and - constructionengineering of such improvements.
-
Respectfully submitted,
.- J. MANNING -
MJM:CB:mcc - Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/08/99 TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT - NINTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (COE.G2.94)
Clark County has submitted a request for a ninth supplemental interlocal contract to reallocate funds for betterments to the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project. At this time the County would like to reallocate and make additional funds available for utility relocations in Decatur Boulevard to match the best bid for the work. Other project costs were reduced to accommodate these increases. No additional funds are being requested at this time. Funding will be provided as follows:
Contract Current Funding Proposed Funding
Project Costs Set 11(2&3) $14,524,198.64 $14,326,602.64 LERRDS Trop Outfall Set 11(9)(A) 361,527.OO 361,527.OO LERRDS Lower Red Rock Complex Set 11(9)(B) 406,073.03 406,073.03 LERRDS Lower Blue Diamond Complex Set 11(9)(C) 94,800.OO 94,800.OO LERRDS Flamingo Diversion Channel T Set 11(9)(D) 663,655.OO 861,251.OO
-v WRDA ‘96 Set 211 Costs Set 11(7) 449.746.33 449.746.33 Total ILC Value $16,500,000.00 $16,500,000.00
- The District Attorney has reviewed the contract.
- I Staff Recommendation: Approve.
- Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
- I Recommendation: Approve. - Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:
I Recommendation: Approve. s
SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT NO. 9 FOR /c-+ ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT
THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT made and entered into this day of 1999,by andbetween County of Clark, a political subdivisionof the Stateof Nevada, hereinafterdeferred to as “COUNTY’ and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafterreferred to as “DISTRICT”.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuantto Chapter543 of the NevadaRevised Statutes, the DISTRICT may approvea project to designand constructflood control improvements;and,
WHEREAS, the flood controlimprovements proposed by Army Corpsof Engineersfor the Tropicanaand Flamingo Washes are identified in the MasterPlan Update as StructureNos. RRWA, _ RRR4; FLFl; FLF2; FLF4; FLWA 1367-1554;FLTR; TRWA - 0256 - 1144; TRRW, and hereinafterreferred to as “Project,” and, - WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT have enteredinto a Project Cooperation Agreement(PCA) with the Army Corps of Engineers;and, --- WHEREAS, the Projectis locatedin the unincorporatedarea of the COUNTY; and,
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is responsiblefor lands,easements, right-of-way, relocations and disposalsites; and,
WHEREAS, on January12,1995, the Clark County Board of Commissioners(BOARD), and the DISTRICT enteredinto an Interlocal Contract, SupplementalNo. 1 datedNovember 9, 1995; SupplementalNo. 2 dated June 12, 1997; SupplementalNo. 3 dated April 9, 1998by the DISTRICT and datedMay 5,1998 by the BOARD; SupplementalNo. 4 datedSeptember lo,1998 by the DISTRICT and datedOctober 6,1998 by the BOARD; SupplementalNo. 5 datedJanuary 14,1999by the DISTRICT anddated January 19,1999 by the BOARD; SupplementalNo. 6 dated April 8,1999 by the DISTRICT and datedApril 6,1999 by the BOARD; SupplementalNo. 7 dated May 13,1999 by the DISTRICT and datedJune 1,1999 by the BOARD, and, SupplementalNO. 8 datedSeptember 9,1999 by the DISTRICT anddated September 7,199 by the BOARD, for Army Corpsof EngineersTropicana and FlamingoWashes Project; and,
WHEREAS, the InterlocalContract provided for supplementalcontracts to increasefunding - levels; and,
WHEREAS, it is desirable to provide funding to the COUNTY for flood control - improvementsnot includedin the Army Corps of EngineersPCA.
Tropicana/Flamingo Washes, COE, Supp 9 F940712 CB:mcc PageIof3 - NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationof the covenants,conditions, agreementsand promisesof the partieshereto, the DISTRICT andthe COUNTY agreeto supplementthe Interlocal Contract dated January 12, 1995 SupplementalContract No. 1, SupplementalContract No. 2, SupplementalContract No. 3, SupplementalInterlocal Contract No. 4, SupplementalNo. 5, SupplementalNo. 6, SupplementalNo. 7, SupplementalNo. 8, as follows:
SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS - paragraph 4 is changed to read as follows:
4. It is understoodthat the COUNTY is hereby authorizedto spendan initial sum of up to $14,326,602.64to provide the servicesdescribed in paragraphs2 and 3 of this section.
SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS - paragraph 9 is changed to read as follows:
9. TheDISTRICT agreesto provideProject costs for the design,construction and construction engineeringfor LERRDS, which includesimprovements to: A. TheTropicana Outfall Channelconsisting of the following improvementsat a cost not to exceed$361,527.00. 1) The street drain inlet at Wynn Road; 2) The storm sewerconnector and manholeat Station 18+03of the channel; 3) The additional work required to maintain and replace the SouthPolaris Avenuetemporary crossing, including adjusting manholes and watervalves andrepaving and restriping the street. 4) The Industrial Road crossingincludes the detour during constructionand replacingthe streetpavement. 5) IndustrialRoad confluencechannel transition and Nevada Power Company .- undergroundutility relocation. B. TheLower Red Rock Complex,consisting of the following improvementsat a cost not to exceed$406,073.03. - 1) RussellRoad Crossinginstallation of a 0.61 meter ductile iron pipe, to be imbeddedin the concretetop slabof the box culvert structureand bulkhead for future use. - 2) RussellRoad Crossing construction of a singlereinforced box culvert in lieu of a rectangularconcrete channel. RussellRoad Crossing removal and replacementof the existing roadway - 3) pavement,curb, gutter, street lighting and conduit. 4) DurangoDrive Crossingconstruction of a singlereinforced concrete box in lieu of a rectangularconcrete channel. 5) DurangoDrive Crossingand Detour Road removal and replacementof the existingDurango Drive roadway,including traffic control onto the existing detourroad, traffic control signsand barricades, and the subsequentremoval of the existing detour road. Costs incurred after December 1, 1998, are eligiblefor reimbursement. - TropieanaFlamingo Washes, COE, Supp 9 F940712 ‘- CB:mcc PageZof3 C. The Lower Blue Diamond Channel,consisting of the crossingat SunsetRoad, at a cost not to exceed$94,800.00. D. FlamingoDiversion Channel- PhaseI at a cost not to exceed$861,25 1 .OO. 1) Relocate 42-inch waterline within Decatur Boulevard includesreplacing pavementand traffic control.
The remainderof the Interlocal Contractand SupplementalInterlocal Contracts No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, and No. 8 remainunchanged.
Dateof CommissionAction: CLARKCOUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
By: BRUCE L. WOODBURY Chairman Attest:
SHIRLEY B. PARRAGUIRRE County Clerk Date of District Action: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By: LAWRENCE L. BROWN, III, Chairman Attest:
CAROLYNFRAZIER Secretaryto the Board Approvedas to Form:
CHRISTOPHERFIGGINS Deputy District Attorney
Tropicana/Flamingo Washes, COE, Supp 9 F940712 cB:mcc Page 3 of 3 -
- CLARK COUNTY
c REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAMINGO DIVERSION CHANNEL, TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT (COE.G2.94)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Approve.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve.
-
-
-
--
- RFCD AGENDA ITEM #09 DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
FLAMINGO DIVERSION CHANNEL AT DECATUR BOULEVARD, 42-INCH WATER LINE RELOCATION PETITIONER:
- M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE - RECOMMENDATION OF THE AWARD OF BID FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLAMINGO DIVERSION CHANNEL AT DECATUR BOULEVARD, 42-INCH WATER LINE RELOCATION, TO THE BEST BIDDER, DARBY NEAGLE ENTERPRISES. -
FISCAL IMPACT: -- None
BACKGROUND: -
On November4, 1999, at 2: 15 p.m., bids for the constructionof improvementsto the Flamingo I. Diversion Channelat DecaturBoulevard, 42-inch water line relocation,were openedin the office of the Director of General Services. Six bids were received ranging from $749,409.02to
$1,151,500.21. The best bidder, in the amountof $749,409.02,was Darby NeagleEnterprises. -- Sufficient funding is allocatedfor constructionon this project. A tabulation of bids is attached.
-
- Respectfully submitted,
F.
J. MANNING - 9. Director of Public Works MJM:JJC:mcc - Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/08/99 RECEIVE A REPORT ON THE AWARD OF BID FOR THE FLAMINGO DIVERSION CHANNEL, WATERLINE RELOCATION - TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT (COE.G2.94)
On November 4, 1999 Clark County opened bids for relocation of a 42- inch waterline at Decatur Boulevard associated with the Flamingo Diversion Channel. This project is a part of the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes project funded jointly with the US Army Corps of Engineers. Six bids were received, ranging from $749,409.12 to $1,15 1,500.2 1. The County evaluated bids, and awarded the contract to Darby Neagle Enterprises in the amount of $749,409.12. Sufficient funds are identified in the interlocal contract for this project. Bid tabulations are included in the backup
Staff Recommendation:
Receive the report.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
Receive the report. - I - Discus&on by Citizens Advisory Committee: I#12 DzE99
-
Recommendation:
Receive the report.
I120999COEG294-bid aid BID NO. 4544.99 PROJECT NO: F950916 BID OPENING: 11-14-99 PROJECT NAME: FLAMINGO DIVERSION CHANNEL @ DECATUR BOULEVARD, K&INCH WATERLINE RELOCATION PWP-CL-2000.115
i ! i I I CLARK COUNTY L- REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES PROJECT - ESCROW ACCOUNT
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve.
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #lO DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM F-- - SUBJECT:
TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT -ESCROW PAYMENT - I -1 PETITIONER
GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER
I J -
I 1 RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER I - ITHAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF $1,706,000FROM FUND 286 TO FUND 443 TO BE PLACED INTO THE CORPS ESCROW ACCOUNT - FISCAL IMPACT:
$1,706,000 .- BACKGROUND:
On January12,1995, the Board authorizedthe Chairmanto sign a ProjectCooperation Agreement (PCA) with -- Clark County and the U.S. Corps of Engineersfor the Tropicanaand Flamingo WashesFlood Control Project. The PCA identifiesthe District as the agencyresponsible for the non-federalshare of fundingfor theproject, and Clark County as the agencyresponsible for the acquisitionof project rights-of-way.Under the Agreement,the - District shall depositcash contributions to the U.S. Governmentin an escrowaccount, with interestaccruing to the District.
On September9,1999, in conl?ormancewith the PCA, the Board approvedthe transferof $2,534,000into the Corps Escrow accountfor the District’s contributionto fimd the Tropicanaand Flamingo WashesFlood Control Project. The amounttransferred for this projectwas basedon $15,100,000of Federalfunds budgeted in Fiscal Year 2000. However, Congresshas appropriatedadditional funds for Fiscal Year 2000. The total amountof Federalfunds allocatedto this project for this fiscal year is $24,870,000thus increasingthe non-Federalcash requirementto $4,240,000. -
In conformancewith the PCA, an additionalcontribution of $1,706,000is requiredby the District in FiscalYear 2000 for the Tropicanaand Flamingo Washes Project. Staff recommendsthat the Board approvethe transferof __ that amountfrom Fund 286 to the CapitalProjects Fund 443 to be placedin the Corpsescrow account. A copyof the letter from the Corps of engineerswith additionalbackground information is includedin the backup. - Respectfullysubmitted
I I I TAC AGENDA RFCDAGENDA - ITEM # ITEM# 10 Date: 12116199 Date: 12109199 LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CyR?S~~,!Eff~N~S~: $5 P.O. BOX 532711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325
November 18,1999 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF:
Office of the Chief Civil Projects Branch
Mr. Gale Wm. Fraser, II, P.E. General Manager/Chief Engineer Clark County Regional Flood Control District 600 S. Grand Central Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89106-45 11
Dear Mr. Fraser:
This is in reference to the required cash contribution payment for the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project, NV. The calculated cash contribution for Fiscal Year 2000 is based on ARTICLE VI, Method of Payment, of the Project Cooperation Agreement signed on February 7,1995. .-- In my July 28,1999 letter to you, we requested the amount of $2,534,000 of non-Federal funds, based on our expectation of receiving Federal funds in the amount of $15,100,000. You have deposited these non-Federal funds into your escrow account in accordance with our Project Cooperation Agreement. However, Congress has appropriated additional funds for FY 2000. The total amount of Federal funds allocated to this project for FY 2000 is $24,870,000. Based on the additional $9,770,000 of Federal funds received this fiscal year, an additional $1,706,000 of non-Federal funds are required.
Please deposit this amount into the escrow account established for the project no later than March 3 1,200O.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
- Stuart H. Brehm III Project Manager, Tropicana and Flamingo Washes Project, NV -
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT i-
- AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
MASTER PLAN UPDATE FOR THE MUDDY RIVER WATERSHED (MOAPA VALLEY, MOAPA AND GLENDALE)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate a professional services contract with G.C. Wallace, Inc., to prepare a Master Plan Update for the Muddy River Watershed.
-
-
-
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #II DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
PREPARE A MASTER PLAN UPDATE FOR THE MUDDY RIVER WATERSHED (MOAPA VALLEY, MOAPA AND GLENDALE) PETITIONER:
GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER TO DEVELOP A SCOPE OF WORK AND NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH G.C. WALLACE, INC., TO PREPARE A MASTER PLAN UPDATE FOR THE MUDDY RIVER WATERSHED (MOAPA VALLEY, MOAPA AND GLENDALE)
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
BACKGROUND: The District is required by statute (NRS 543.596) to update the Master Plan at least once every five years. The Master Plan for Moapa valley was last updated and adopted by the Board as an amendment to the Master Plan on January 12, 1995.
Since the last Master Plan Update was adopted, Clark County and their consultant, G.C. Wallace, Inc., have been pursuing a master plan project on the Muddy River in Moapa Valley. This project was presented to the Moapa Valley Town Advisory Board (TAB) and the community in the Spring of 1998. The project was met with considerable opposition by the community. In an effort to pursue a flood control solution for the Muddy River, a Moapa Valley Flood Control Advisory Committee was formed and the District hired a facilitator to work with the group on reaching a consensus of flood control needs for the area. It was agreed that a Master Plan Update would not commence until clear direction was given to the District on a preferred flood control solution.
The Advisory Committee first met in November 1998 with the facilitator, District and County staff, and the engineering firm of G.C. Wallace, Inc. Considerable time and effort was spent on exploring alternatives. The majority of investigating and presenting alternatives was performed by G.C. Wallace, Inc. The Advisory Committee was unable to reach a consensus and
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #li. DATE: 12/09h99 - - consequently, a survey of property owners impacted by the structural solutions to the Muddy River was taken. The results of the survey likewise did not provide clear direction for a flood control solution along the Muddy River.
An abridged presentation of alternatives reviewed by the Advisory Committee along with the survey results was made at a special TAB workshop in September 1999. The TAB spent extensive time reviewing alternatives and attending community meetings to better educate themselves on flooding solutions. At the TAB meeting of October 27, 1999, recommendations were made to:
Obtain easements from all the property owners along the Muddy River Maintain the entire channel Pursue legislation to offer the flood proofing program to impacted property owners Utilize the remaining funds that would have been spent on the structural solution for additional flood control projects along the west washes and the Overton Wash
At this time, the District would like to proceed with direction given by the TAB to complete the Master Plan Update of the Muddy River. The area includes the Moapa Valley, Moapa, and Glendale. Based upon knowledge and expertise of the flooding problems, solutions explored, community needs, and overall understanding of the process; involvement with the Advisory Committee, TAB, Clark County and the District over past years, staff recommends that the consulting firm of G.C. Wallace, Inc. prepare the Master Plan Update. Further, staff proposes to hold meetings with the impacted TABS throughout the preparation of the Master Plan Update and to initially obtain their concurrence in the scope of work for the project.
Funding for preparation of the Master Plan Update was included in the Fiscal Year 1998-99 budget. Those funds have been rolled forward to Fiscal Year 1999-00 to complete the project. It is expected - that a professional services contract will be before the Board in early 2000. Completion of the Master Plan Update should be presented to the Board for adoption in early 2001. Staff recommends the Board authorize the General Manager/Chief Engineer to develop a scope of work and negotiate - a professional services contract with G.C. Wallace, Inc.
- Respectfully submitted,
- RFCD AGENDA ITEM #26 Date: 1 l/10/99
Gale Wm Fraser, II, P.E. General Manager/Chief Engineer 111099moapaMPUitm -
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT L
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: -
MASTER PLAN CHANGE - WINDMILL WASH OUTFALL SYSTEM PHASE II, TOWN
- OF BUNKERVILLE - THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING
- RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve and recommend that the Board finds the Master Plan Change: 1) Is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; 2) Is the most cost-effective structural or regulatory means of controlling flood waters; and 3) Does not adversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Follow the staff recommendation.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Follow the staff recommendation.
-
-
r I RFCD AGENDA ITEM #12 .- DATE: 12/09/99
d CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT /? AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
BUNKERVILLE FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN - WINDMILL WASH OUTFALL SYSTEM, PHASE II FACILITIES PETITIONER:
M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE A MASTER PLAN CHANGE FOR THE WINDMILL WASH OUTFALL SYSTEM, PHASE II FACILITIES, IN BUNKERVILLE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
In the 1995 Bunkerville Flood Control Master Plan Update (MPU), the Windmill Wash outfall facilities (1SST 0000) was proposedto convey flows westerly to the Virgin River through the reinforcedconcrete box storm drain alongFirst SouthStreet. Theproposed MPU change,detailed in the attachedstudy, would move the proposedlocation of the outfall systemto the farm fields to conveythe flows northerly to the Virgin River through the reinforcedconcrete pipe storm drain and channel. The proposedrelocation is estimatedto cost 18% less than the current outfall alignment.
Respectfully submitted,
Director of PublicWorks MJM:FS:mcc Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/08/99 MASTER PLAN CHANGE - WINDMILL WASH OUTFALL SYSTEM, TOWN OF BUNKERVILLE - THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING
Clark County has requested a Master Plan Change to the Windmill Wash Outfall in the Town of Bunkerville. The 1995 Master Plan for the Town of Bunkerville identifies two phases for the Windmill Wash flood control system. Phase I has been completed and includes the Windmill Wash Detention Basin and Jess Waite Wash Diversion. Clark County restudied the Phase II outfall system in response to property owner concerns over expected flood impacts from the extended detention basin outflow. Approval of this change will realign the outfall along a more direct northern route at an estimated 18% cost savings. Furthermore, facilities identified as Phase IIa can be built with unexpended funds from the detention basin project and alleviate the concerns of the area residents. Staff has reviewed the technical analysis supporting this request and concurs with its findings and recommendations.
For this Master Plan Change to become effective it must be adopted and made a part of the comprehensive plans of Clark County pursuant to NRS 278. I
Staff Recommendation:
Approve and recommend that the Board finds the Master Plan Change:
1. Is hydraulically similar to the facility proposed in the Master Plan; 2. Is the most cost-effective structural or regulatory means of controlling flood waters; and 3. Does not adversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
- ~ Recommendation:
Follow the staff recommendation.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
Follow the staff recommendation. Bunkerville Flood Control r Master Plan Change for Windmill Wash Outfall System (Phase II Facilities)
Clark County is requesting a change to the Windmill Wash outfall system which is identified as the Phase II facilities of the Flood Control Master Plan Update approved by the Regional Flood Control District on September 14, 1995 for the Town of Bunkerville.
The 1995 Master Plan Update identified two phases, Phase I and Phase II, of recommended flood control facilities as shown in Figure ES1 and its data sheet (Appendix A). The Phase I facilities have already been constructed with the Windmill Wash Detention Basin project (Bid No. 4146-98). They include the Windmill Wash detention basin, outfall pipe from the detention basin to Riverside Drive, and the Jess Waite Wash diversion dike. Construction of the Phase II facilities are not in the Ten-Year program list, and these facilities consist of the Windmill Wash outfall box from the energy dissipator, constructed near Riverside Drive, to the Virgin River via First South Street, the Jess Waite Wash collector channel, sediment basin and other associated facilities.
Clark County restudied the Phase II facilities in response to an urgent request from property owners who claimed their lands are in danger of getting flooded by the storm water discharged directly from the Windmill Wash detention basin. Although the property owners understand that the rate of loo-year runoff has been significantly reduced from 4,500 cfs to 135 cfs by the construction of the detention basin, they feel very unsafe to know that a majority of the runoff (500 ac-ft) concentrated in the detention basin will flow down to their lands for 3 days when a loo-year storm occurs.
As a result of the restudy, Clark County identified the Windmill Wash outfall facilities (Phase IIa) which could be built mainly utilizing funds unencumbered on the detention basin project. The concept of these facilities are shown in the attached Amended Figure ES1 and its data sheet (Appendix B) along with the cost estimate shown in the attached Table 1 (Appendix B).
The proposed Master Plan Change would meet the requirements of subsection 2 of NRS 543.597 as follows:
1. The change is consistent with the general principles set forth in subsection 3 of NRS 543.590. The change proposes flood control outfall facilities which would effectively correct problems of flooding within concerned area of Bunkerville. Outfall facilities, which could be - immediately constructed (Phase IIa) on the basis of availability of funds, are identified as well as future flood control facilities (Phase IIb) for a complete and functional flood control system. The concept of the change was presented to and accepted by the Bunkerville Town - Advisory Board on July 22, 1999. The meeting minutes are attached herewith for reference (Appendix C).
2. The proposed change is to be hydraulically similar to the outfall facilities of the 1995 Master ,- Plan Update as the Windmill Wash outfall facilities would be designed to convey the same flows controlled by the Windmill Wash detention basin and future Jess Waite Wash flood control facilities as determined with the 1995 Master Plan Update.
3. The change is cost-effective. The estimated cost for the phase II facilities proposed by the change would be approximately $400,000 less than the cost for those of the 1995 Master Plan Update as indicated in the attached Table 1 (Appendix B).
4. The change does not adversely affect the continued implementation of the Master Plan as the facilities proposed by the change would function similar to those of the 1995 Master Plan Update. The change would provide a shorter distance to an outlet at Virgin River on a slightly flatter grade than the alignment of the 1995 Mater Plan Update. The change would follow the natural direction of the storm runoff more closely than the alignment of the 1995 Master Plan Update.
In conclusion, Clark County recommends adoption of this Master Plan Change as it is in conformance with the requirements of NRS 543.597.
-
-
-
- -- ADpendix A
Figure ES1 -Recommended Flood Control Plan
Figure ES1 Data Sheet
Table A - Project Cost
Note: Information provided in this Appendix is the reproduction of the 1995 Bunkerville Flood Control Master Plan Update. r
I I
. I
I LEOEND DAMEMBANKMENT
I DlVERSlON LEVEE
- PHASEIa I - PHASEIb I - PHASE11 I
I I
I I o-mn SCALE APPROXIMATE I DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY VW?4
I I I FIGURE ES1 ~&iEc~~MEl[, FLOOD CONTROL PLAN
I FLOOD CONTROL MASTER PLAN UPDATE I I ObWHIll I C
Figure ES1 Data Sheet - Recommended Flood Control Plan
River Phase Facility Capacity - Facility ID Mile= No. Description of Facility Length (cfs) PhaseI
-
36” buried reinforced concrete -
460 ac-ft detention basin - 45,000-cfsPMF spillwayb l-36” lowflow outlet - USBR Type III stilling basin 520 ac-ft detention basin
-
--
Collector channel(12’ bottom width, 4’ depth, 3H: 1V side
Sediment basin Rehabilitated 300’-wide existing
ISST (First South 0000 6’ x 6’ buried reinforced concrete 5,000’+ Street) box culvert 6’ x 6’ flow combining box at me
Riverside Drive - aRiver Mile indicates distanceabove confluence,in hundrethsof a mile.
bPMF is probable maximum flood. -
-
-
- iv RDD10014DlB.DOC Table A Project Cost Phase Total Cost ($1 Phase Ia 4.5 million l 490 ac-ft detention basin l 36” lowflow outlet a 45,000 cfs spillway Phase Ib 0.5 million l Detention basin excavation to 520 ac-ft 0 1,500’levee Phase I Total 5.0 million Phase II 2.2 million 0 Collector channel/sedimentbasin l Rehabilitate existing gabion dams 0 Remove energy dissipator and replacewith 6’ x 6’ inflow junction box 0 6’ x 6’ reinforced concrete box outfall . Total Project Cost 7.2 million
- Phase I The site selected for the Windmill Wash detention basin is on U.S. Phase I involves design and con- Bureau of Land Management pro- -- struction of a detention basin on perty, as close to town as possible to Windmill Wash that would detain increase effectiveness. Because of peak storm volume from Basins 7 the steep topography of the site, the and 8. PhaseI may be constructedin project would require a relatively two stagesif funding for all PhaseI deep reservoir and a significant facilities cannot be obtained. Con- amount of excavation. In addition, - struction may be sequenced to the feasibility of the dam site would complete PhaseIa first and PhaseI’b need to be carefully evaluatedduring when feasible. conceptual or preliminary design, - including geologic mapping, test Phase Ia Facilities. The detention boring and test pits, and laboratory basin includes a dam constructed of soils testing. Concerns‘about suit- an earthfill embankment, which ability of the site and the embank- would use the material excavated ment-type dam need to be resolved onsite for the. detention basin. The early in the project process. dam concept includes a chute-type spillway and a USBR Type III stilling basin. Cutlet works for the detention basin would convey low- flows to Riverside Drive via a buried 36-inch-diameterreinforced concrete pipe.
. . . 111 ADpendix B
Amended Figure ES1 - Recommended Flood Control Plan
Amended Figure ES1 Data Sheet - Table l- Project Cost for Phase II Facilities
Note: Information provided in this Appendix is the result of restudy on the Phase II facilities of the 1995 Bunkerville Flood Control Master Plan Update.
-
- Amended Figure ES1 Data Sheet
i/ Recommended Flood Control Plan River Phase Description of Facility Facility Capacity - Facility ID Mile” No. Length (cfs) Phase I’ - WIWA (Windmill 0000 la Energy dissipator 40’+ Wash) la 36” reinforced concrete pipe 2,500+ 125 - 038 la 460 ac-ft detention basin -
- - la 45,000-cfs PMF spillwayb 45,000
la l-36” lowflow outlet 135
- la USBR Type III stilling basin 45,000
0038 lb 520 ac-ft detention basin -- -. (additional excavation)
JEWA (Jess Waite 0165 lb 1 O’-high diversion levee 1,500’+ -. Wash)
Phase II
WIJE (Windmill Wash 0000 Ila Earth channel (16’ bottom width, 2,800’k 330 and Jess Waite Wash) 4’ depth, 3H:lV side slopes)
0053 Ila Transition basin (existing pond) 250’5
0058 Ila 66” reinforced concrete pipe 1 ,OOO’+ 33c
Ila 60” reinforced concrete pipe 500’+ 33c
Ila 54” reinforced concrete pipe 400’+ 33c
JEWA (Jess Waite 0000 Ilb 48” reinforced concrete pipe 500’+ 29c - Wash) 0009 Ilb Collector channel (12’ bottom 500’+ 26C width, 4’ depth, 3H:lV side slopes)
Ilb Sediment basin 40’
- 0044 Ilb Rehabilitated 300’-wide existing gabion dam
- 0061 Ilb Rehabilitated 70’-wide existing - _. gabion dam
aRiver Mile indicates distance above confluence, in hundreths of a mile.
bPMF is probable maximum flood.
CConstruction of Phase I facilities are completed with the Windmill Wash Detention Basin project, Bid No. 4146-98. C
Table 1 .-. Project Cost for Phase II Facilities - Change to 1995 Bunkerville Master Plan Update
Phase IIa - Immediate Imnrovement: - l Earth channel $200,000 l Maintenance access through existing pond (transition basin) $ 10,000 l 53” x 83” HE reinforced concrete pipe (66” equivalent) $340,000 l 48” x 76” HE reinforced concrete pipe (60” equivalent) $160,000 l 43” x 68” HE reinforced concrete pipe (54” equivalent) $130,000
R/W acquisition $ 60,000
Total Phase IIa Cost $900,000 _
Phase IIb - Future Imnrovement: --I-- l Collector channel/sediment basin/connection pipe $230,000 l Rehabilitate existing gabion dams $ 70,000 - l Modify existing energy dissipator to an junction structure $20,000 - Total Phase IIb Cost $320,000
Additional Future Improvement on Phase IIa Facilities: l Remove existing 5-36” CMP culverts crossing and $ 80,000 - replace with a 43” x 68” horizontal elliptical RCP l Riprap lining along earth channel and pond $500.000
Total Additional Future Improvement Cost $580,000 - Total Phase II Cost $1,800,000 -
Notes: ----I 1. In situation where project funds are insufficient, it is recommended that the Phase IIa facilities - - listed above be constructed from Virgin River to an upstream location wherever the available funds could cover. L
2. It is recommended that the earth channel be constructed within a 70’ wide R/W purchased from the property owners and the outfall pipes be installed within a 20’ wide drainage easement dedicated by the property owners. It is also recommended a 70’ wide easement for maintenance of existing pond and access to the channel. Existing pond is being used to control mosquito problems, and the property owner wants to keep the pond for now. The pond will be considered as a transition basin between the outfall pipe and channel. The - pond may be modified to a complete flood control facility in the future.
3. Portion of Phase II facilities, identified in the 1995 mater plan update, for improvement along Jess Waite Wash such as a collector channel, sediment basin, connection pipe, etc, are not proposed to be immediately constructed due to limited funding, but shall remain as integral parts of the flood control facilities for future construction.
4. Existing 5-36” CMP culverts at Riverside Drive will remain as is, but may be replaced with a 54” RCP or equivalent pipe in conjunction with construction of Phase II facilities along Jess Waite Wash in the future.
5. Earth channel will include grade control structures for integrity of the channel. Lining of the channel would be considered as a future construction item.
6. Total cost for the Phase II facilities of the 1995 Master Plan Update was estimated to be $2.2 million as shown in the attached Table A (Appendix A) of the 1995 Master Plan Update, which is roughly $400,000 higher than the Phase II facilities evaluated herein.
-
-- Appendix C
Bunkerville Town Advisory Board Meeting
Minutes
-- - Ml-NUTES BUNKERVILLE TOWN ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 7:00 P.M. - JULY 22,1999 BUNKERVILLE T.A.B. ROOM CLARK COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY - BUNKERVILLE, NV
Those board members in attendance: Kenyon Leavitt Nick Bartlett Junior Dalton Brent Leavitt
I. Opening Ceremonies A. Call to order B. Invocation C. Pledge of allegiance D. Introduction of board and county representatives E. Approval of minutes from June 24,1999 Motion to approve as amended: Brent Leavitt Sue wanted to clarify her statement concerning the cemetary. She is confident the county commissioners would give the non-profit organization anything with in reason. Second: Nick Bartlett Unanimously approved F. Approval of Agenda Motion to approve as amended add E. Parks and Rec. master plan and F.Horses to the discussions and Delete C on the action items: Nick Bartlett Second: Junior Dalton Unanimously approved G. Approval of Secretary Activity Log Motion to approve: Nick Bartlett Second: Junior - II. Discussion A. Chuck Pulsipher - Kenyon asked Mr. Pulsipher how that board should go about allowing horses. Mr. Pulsipher indicated that there were already in place standards that would allow horses. If the town board wanted to adopt those standards, Several in town have received citation for having hoses. Sue indicated that if they minutes indicated they would support a rural standard public response would hold off any further action until the standard was put in place. The town board is looking at adopting the by right standard with a % lot and manure control. B. Sue Baker - Sue asked if any one had received a postcard asking people to verify their P.O. Box number. No one had received them. Junior asked how we could get is street addresses. There are several boys who would like to do any eagle project to get street addresses and let people know what they are. Colleen Reber indicated that the county doesn’t’ have the right addresses. Kenyon indicated the tire dept. would also like to have that information. -Training for town board members Monday July 26 at 6-8pm and Saturday July 3 1 at g-1130 am in the government center. -A member of another town board asked advanced planning if they have to approve L
--
conforming zone changes. It’s not zoned that now but it complies with the master plan. n You can deny a conforming and a nonconforming. You should always give your reason for - approval and denial. -Variances allowing a second home on a lot - usually the reason for the second home is a elder parent, then the situation changes and it becomes a rental. Ifthis happens public response can take action right away because code wouldn’t allow it to be a rental. The town board should clarity at the time of the variance that if the elderly parent is no long in the home they must come back to the board for a new variance. The USPS has selected the property where they would like to purse building the post offtce. It is located on in the Northeast comer of Main and Second Street. The public may offer comments about the property selected for the next thirty days. C. Change by laws to accommodate the second meeting a month for zoning items. This will effect the meeting dates every month. Our meetings will be on a two-week cycle. Our primary meeting date will not always fall on the forth Thursday of the month. The town board will have staff recommendations and a full history and neighbors will be informed to come here to comment on zoning changes. J D. Out fall for flood control - The County presented a plan for draining the water from the - flood basin. Eventually the plan is to construct drainage from the detention basin site through the town North to the Virgin River. That ditTers from the original master plan which was to drain the water West along First South Street all the way to the Virgin River. - This was the plan because the property owners wouldn’t allow access. However it appears that situation has changes and they will allow access North from the detention basin site all the way to the river. The proposal includes an earthen channel with in 60 feet of the purchased right of way from the river to the existing pond. That land belongs to Roger Bunker and Bob Draskovich. They may also ask for a construction essment to provide appropriate transition between the channel and the existing grade. Typically the size of the channel is 16 feet at the bottom, 4 feet deep, along with 3 to 1 side slope. From the pond to the Riverside Drive is proposed underground storm drain system with in 20 feet of dedicated ---- essment. The size will very from 66 inches at the pond to 54 inches at Riverside Drive. This facility will handle a 100 years storm run off. We have about $700,000 that can be used for this project. However that is not enough for what is being proposed. The - suggestion is that we start at the river and move towards the flood basin and go as far as we can with the money. E. Parks and Recreation master plan -Kenyon read the master plan concerning Bunkerville. They listed the items Town board had indicated as needs. The needs are as follows: Lighted soccer field, expanded tennis/ basketball courts to accommodate 2 full size tennis courts with finished surface, a walk/jogging trail around the park, play ground equipment renovation and replacements, natural trail located northwest of the soccer field. Kenyon asked if there was anything that needed to be added to the list. Kenyon also wanted to see a communitee pool. Sue said she would see that it was added to list. Junior would like some one for the county to explain to the board why the lights on the soccer field aren’t acceptable. There are 6-8 poles with 2 lights on each pole that need lights. F. Horses - Discussed on item A. III. Action Item A. R-U to R-A Zoning Motion to request R-U zoning to R-A zoning: Brent Leavitt Second: Junior Dalton Approved B. Motion to approve John Even Waite’s eagle project to build a case to house a copy of the plot map at the cemetery : Nick Bartlett Second: Brent Leavitt Approved C. Variance for Thomas and Melissa Navarro Deleted from the agenda D. Redo Cemetery committee Dixie has property adjoining the cemetery and he is proposing a land swap to enable the county to enlarge the cemetery. Dixie would get the Canal street and a new access to Canal street would be but in from Riverside road. The cemetery would get Canal Street in front of the cemetery to Riverside road. Cecil lefl the map with town board. Kenyon would like the committee to determine whether or not it was feasible for a non-profit organization to take over the cemetery and make a proposal to the county and if the county accepts our proposal get the non-profit organization set up. Motion to redo the cemetery committee with Nick Bartlett as the chair, Cecil Leavitt, Mike Waite, and Marianne Leavitt as members: Brent Leavitt Amend motion to include Liz Leavitt and Junior Dalton: Junior Dalton Second: Brent Leavitt Approved E. Motion to approve proposal by the public works: Brent Leavitt Second: Junior Dalton Approved
IV. Comments by General Public l Jay Hardy was very upset about comments he heard about, that the town board made about the cemetery not being cared for adequately. The town board apologized for any comments made about the maintenance of the cemetery. Those comments do not reflect the feeling of the town board. . V. Schedule of Next meeting for August 26,1999 VI. Adjournment
.-
-
-
- AGENDA BUNKERVILLE TOWN ADVISORY BOARD MEETING 7:00 P. M. AUGUST 26,1999 BUNKERVILLE T. A. B. ROOM LOCATED IN THE CLARK COUNTY JUSTICE COURT FACILITY - BUNKERVILLE, NV -
Town boards members: Kenyon Leavitt Junior Dalton David Leavitt Nick Bartlett Brent Leavitt
This meeting has been posted in the following locations: Bu&erville Post Oflice Btmkerville Community Center
I. Opening Ceremonies A. Call to order B. Invocation C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Introduction of Board and County Representatives J E. Approval of Minutes from July 22,1999 meeting F. Approval of Agenda G. Approval of Secretary activity log
II. Discussion items A. Sue Baker - Northeast Coordinator B. Discuss fiscal year 2000-2001 proposed budget requests and seek community input. C. Discuss names for the representative for the CDBG committee.
III. Action items A. Change by -laws to accommodate the second meeting a month for zoning items. B. “By -Right” Design standard, % lot with design standard, manure control
IV. Comments by General Public V. Scheduling of Next meeting for September 16,1999 VI. Adjournment - CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT iv - AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: - FREEWAY CHANNEL, ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY - FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA AVENUE - PROJECT PRESENTATION (LAS.09.L.98)
L I -
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY -
STAFF: Accept the presentation.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Accept the presentation. -
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Accept the presentation. -4
-
-
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #13A DATE: 12/09/99 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT n AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
PROJECT PRESENTATION - FREEWAY CHANNEL - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA - PETITIONER:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS -
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE PROJECT PRESENTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE FREEWAY CHANNEL - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None by this action.
BACKGROUND:
The Freeway Channel system lies adjacent to I-15 between Alta Drive and Sahara Avenue. Additional MPU facilities connect to the main system at Western Avenue, Charleston Boulevard, and Oakey Boulevard, collectively these facilities are the Freeway Channel Project. The project - will collect flows that have historically flooded the Charleston Underpass. This project will provide protection to many downstream properties which currently suffer severe flooding even - during minor storm events. Randy Fultz with the City of Las Vegas Public Works will be available for the presentation and will be able to respond to any questions. - Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/29/99 FREEWAY CHANNEL, ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA AVENUE - PROJECT PRESENTATION (LAS.09.L.98)
A representative ofthe City ofLas Vegas will make a project presentation on the Freeway Channel from Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and Bypass Facility. This presentation was made at the Citizen’s Advisory Committee meeting on November 29, 1999.
Additional information submitted by City staff after the TAC meeting revealed that right-of-entry condemnation proceedings have commenced.
Staff Recommendation:
Accept the presentation.
Disksion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA #lOA Date: 1 l/18/99
Recommendation:
Accept the presentation.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: AGENDA #lOA Date: 1l/29/99
Recommendation:
Accept the presentation.
20999las09L98presaid DEVfLOfMfNT SfRVlCfS October 27, 1999 CENTER Gale Fraser,P.E. General Manager/Chief Engineer Clark County Regional Flood Control District 600 South Grand Central Parkway Suite 300 fublicWorks Department Las Vegas, NV 89 106 Engineering flanning Dear Mr. Fraser:
731 S. Fourth Street SUBJECT: FREEWAY CI$ANNEL - ALTA TO SAHARA Las Vegas, NV 89101
Voice 702-229-6541 The design plans for the Freeway Channel - Alta to Saharaare now 90% complete and FAX 702-382-8551 have been reviewed by the City of Las Vegas. We are pleasedto be able to presentthe TDD 702-386-9108 project for construction to the Technical Advisory Committees and the District Board. The following information is being submitted in order to comply with the requirementsof NRS 543.580. Project Costs Design $ 1,901,000 Right-of-Way (Design & Acquistion) $ 1,926,OOO Construction Engineering & Management $ 1,600,OOO Construction $29,200,000 ----- Total = $34,627,000 Right-of-Way - This project will be constructed within dedicated rights-of-way and easementsthat are being obtained from the Union Pacific RailRoad (UPRR). City has begun the necessary _ requirementsfor right of entry on the UPRR property. Project Economic Benefit The same project economic benefit used for the UPRR to Alta segmentwas usedfor this project since it was part of the same system. It is estimated that this project will provide an economic benefit to the City of approximately $62.8 million. This figure was derived by calculating the valuation of property that would be protected in this fully-developed
Mayor area, assuming flooding would occur 2 blocks either side of Charleston Boulevard Osccv 8. Goodman between the UPRR and Boulder Highway. This area which comprises approximately
City Council 721 acreswould be protected. This property is consideredby local real estateappraisers Michael J. McDonald to be worth $20/sf which is believed to conservative.We have assumed 10% of the value Mayor Pro-Tern) of the land would be threatened by flood damage. This value does not consider the Gory Reese safety aspectof a State arterial being flooded during even a minor event. Lorry Brawn Lynette Boggs McDonald As recently as July 8, 1999 a flood event filled the CharlestonUnderpass spilling flows City Monoger to the east and splitting off to side streets,flooding local businessesalong Commerce Virginio Valentine Street,Main Street and Las Vegas Boulevard. This project will protect the properties - immediately downstream from any future storm events. ---A Page 2 Freeway Channel - Alta to Sahara Gale Fraser, P.E.
Project Enhancements Project enhancements are not applicable to this project.
If we can be of additional assistance please call at your convenience.
Randy F%, P.E. Flood Control Project Manager Department of Public Works
cc: Charles Kajkowski, PE- CLV
F:\Depot\RTC-WCD\Freeway Channel\Freeway Channel Proj Present Lttr.doc
-
- _- ..__...._. .--. -- L LEGEND L t * s 8 Future Regional Facilities L /\R Existing Regional Facilities A/ ProposedRegional Facilities L . . xi’ ‘\,,,/ Street Centerlines I L GOLDRZNG ._ .___ 8 --.- ..- $ _. ._ . . . .---._- L 1 -._- ___.....-- 1 1 \1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! fc chaxmel.apr \ CITY OF LAS VEGAS 1 ExHIBlT A - FREE WAY CHANNEL (ALTA TO SXHARA) I 11 I i
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L I r:
I I
I I
I I$ 3 I I
I I
Ii il 1
t I
I I
1-l :_ i i j ! j j I i TjI-‘-c-i- 1-l 5 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN ’ Date 10/27lQ9_ BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JP’ ’ Date 101271~ :
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY u UNIT PRICE UNIT 1 AMOUNT - 200.00.01 Mobilization 1 LS $ 1,900,000.00 $ 1,900,00(
201 .OO.Ol Clearing and Grubbing 1 Is $ 50,000.00 $ 50,OOQ
202.00.01 Remove Curb and Gutter 1720 MI’, $ 13.00 $ 22,36G
202.00.02 Remove Sidewalk 520 SM $ 6.00 $ 3,12C
202.00.03 Remove Driveway 260 SM $ 9.00 $ 2,346
202.00.04 Remove AC Pavement 50200 SM $ 3.00 $ 150.60(
202.00.05 Remove Median Island 800 SM $ 6.00 $ 4,80(-
202.00.06 Remove Slope Paving 100 SM $ 6.00 $ 600
202.00.07 Remove Access Ramp 30 SM $ 17.00 $ 5lC
202.00.08 Remove Guardrail 70 LM $ 20.00 $ 1.w
202.00.09 Remove Shoulder Dike 340 LM $ 10.00 $ 3.400
202.00.10 Remove Cross Drain 260 SM $ 9.00 $ 2.34(
202.00.11 Remove Storm Drain Pipe 820 LM $ 75.00 $ 61,500
202.00.12 Remove Manhole 49 EA $ 1 ,ooo.oo $ 49,OM
202.00.13 Remove Drop inlet 20 13 $ 800.00 $ 16.00(-
202.00.14 Remove Concrete Channel 670 SM $ 15.00 $ 10,052)
202.00.15 Remove Headwall 2 EA$ 600.00 $ 1.20(
202.00.16 Remove Concrete Apron 1 SM $ 500.00 $ 5or
202.00.17 Remove RCB Plug 2 EA $ 1 ,ooo.oo $ 2.000 - 202.00.18 Remove Chain Link Fence 1480 Lb.4 $ 9.00 $ 13.32(
202.00-l 9 Remove Retaining Wall 1 LS $ 5,ooo.oo $ 5.000-
202.00.20 Remove Billboard 5 EA $ 25,OOO.OO $ 125-n
202.00.21 Remove Box Culvert 41 LM $ 400.00 $ 16,40(
1 OF7 I-15 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN Date 10/27/99 BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JPC Date I Of27199
-_ BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY &JNJ UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT 202.00.22 Plug Storm Drain Pipe 4 EA $ 350.00 $ 1,400 - 202.00.23 Plug and Abandon Sanitary Sewer Pipe 1250 LM $ 25.00 $ 31,250
- 209.00.01 Drain Backfill 18220 CUM $ 9.00 $ 163,980
212.00.01 Landscape Restoration I FA $ 25000.00 $ 25,000
216.00.01 Groundwater Dewatering I Is $ 600,OOO.OO $ 600,000
302.00.00 Type II Aggregate Base 13180 CUM $ 21 .oo $ 276,780
402.00.01 50mm Plantmix Bituminous Surface 350 SM $ 3.45 $ 1,208
402.00.02 75mm Plantmix Bituminous Surface 40760 SM $ 5.50 $ 224,180
402.00.03 175mm Plantmix Bituminous Surface 3020 SM $ 12.60 $ 38.052 - 402.00.04 300mm Plantmix Bituminous Surface 6440 SM $ 21.60 $ 139,104
-u 402.00.05 Plantmix Bituminous Shoulder Dike 100 LM $ 15.00 $ 1,500
403.00.01 Plantmix Bituminous Open-Graded Surface 77500 SM $ 1.70 $ 131,750 - 502.00.01 Triple 3.7 m x 2.7 m Reinforced Concrete Box 390 LM $ 4,700.oo $ I ,833.OOO (3.0 m Cover) - 502.00.02 Triple 3.7 m x 3.0 m Reinforced Concrete Box 680 LM $ 5,300.oo $ 3,604,OOO (3.0 m Cover) 502.00.03 Triple 3.7 m x 3.0 m Reinforced Concrete Box 260 LM $ 6,400.OO $ I ,664.OOO (6.0 m Cover) 502.00.04 Triple 3.7 m x 3.0 m Reinforced Concrete Box 80 LM $ 9,500.oo $ 760,000 (9.0 m Cover) 502.00.05 Triple 3.7 m x 3.0 m Reinforced Concrete Box 110 LM $ 9,200.oo $ I ,OI 2.000 (I 2.0 m Cover) 502.00.06 Triple 3.7 m x 3.0 m Reinforced Concrete Box 140 LM $ 10,500.00 $ I ,470,ooo (I 5.0 m Cover) 502.00.07 I .8 m x 0.9 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 40 LM $ 540.00 $ 21,600
502.00.08 I .8 m x 1.2 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 100 LM $ 550.00 $ 55,000
502.00.09 I .8 m x I .8 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 230 LM $ 600.00 $ 138,000
502.00.10 I .2 m x 2.1 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 340 LM $ 630.00 $ 214,200
- 502.00.1 I 2.4 m x I .2 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 390 LM $ 750.00 $ 292,500
2OF7
- I-1 5 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN - Date 10/27m ._. BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JF’ s Date 10/27/d =
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY gNJ UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT- 502.00.12 2.4 m x 1.8 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 110 LM $ 670.00 $ 73,70
502.00.13 3.0 m x 1.8 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 900 LM $ 1,060.OO $ 954.0011
502.00.14 3.0 m x 2.1 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 530 LM $ 1,100.00 $ 583,001~
502.00.15 3.0 m x 2.4 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 500 LM $ 1 ,100.00 $ 550.00-
502.00.16 3.0 m x 2.7 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 120 LM $ 1,200.00 $ 144,000 -
502.00.17 3.7 m x 2.7 m Precast Reinforced Concrete Box 140 LM 8 1,400.00 $ 196.00-
502.00.18 Double 3.0m x 2.4m Precast Reinforced 420 LM $ 2,ooo.oo $ 840,00- Concrete Box 502.00.19 Triple 3.7 m x 2.7 m Precast Reinforced 60 LM $ 3,320.OO $ 199.200 - Concrete Box 502.00.20 Junction Structure No.1 1 LS $ 26,300.OO !§ 26.30
502.00.21 Junction Structure No.2 1 LS $ 505,000.00 $ 5054P
502.00.22 Junction Structure No.3 1 LS $ 451 ,ooo.oo $ 451,uoo - 502.00.23 Junction Structure No.4 1 LS $ 46,200.OO $ 46.20
502.00.24 Connection Structure No.1 1 LS $ 27,200.OO $ 27,200
502.00.25 Connection Structure No.2 1 Is $ 37,200.OO $ 37.20,
502.00.26 Precast RCB Wye 1 EA $ 1 o,ooo.oo !I 10.00
52,OOO.OO $ 156,000 502.00.27 Access/Ventilation Structure 3 EA $ -
502.00.28 Concrete Headwall 3 EA $ 3,800.OO $ 11.40~~
502.00.29 1.5 m x 1.5 m Concrete Channel 70 LM $ 620.00 $ 43,40-~
502.00.30 RCB Plug 4 EA $ 7,500.oo $ 30,000 - 502.00.31 Concrete Retaining Wall 1 Is $ 25,OOO.OO $ 25.00
502.00.32 150mm Concrete Channel Lining 310 SM $ 45.00 $ 13.95a
603.00.01 1200mm Reinforced Concrete Pipe (Class III) 290 LM $ 400.00 $ 1lP’l
605.00.01 450mm PVC Pipe 380 LM $ 165.00 $ 62.70
- 3OF7 145 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN Date 1 O/27/99 - BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JPC Date 1 o/27/99
- BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY &lNJ UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT 60500.02 600mm PVC Pipe 750 LM $ 200.00 $ 150,000
60500.03 750mm PVC Pipe 230 LM $ 230.00 $ 52,900
- 60500.04 900mm PVC Pipe 220 LM $ 295.00 $ 64,900
60500.05 1050mm PVC Pipe 50 LM $ 360.00 $ 18.000
609.00.01 3.0m Drop Inlet Type D Modified 52 EA $ 7,500.oo $ 390,000
-- 609.00.02 6.0m Drop Inlet Type D Modified 103 13 $ 1 o,ooo.oo $ 1.030,000
609.00.03 Type I Manhole 73 EA$ 3,ooo.oo $ 219,000
609.00.04 Type II Manhole 2 EA $ 5,ooo.oo $ 10,000
609.00.05 Special Shallow Manhole 1 13 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500 - 609.00.06 RCB Access Manhole 41 EA $ 4,ooo.oo $ 164,000
-d 609.00.07 Adjust Manhole Cover 18 EA$ 800.00 $ 14,400
609.00.08 Type 2 Drop Inlet 1 I=$ 2,500.OO $ 2,500 - 609.00.09 Type 2A Drop Inlet 4 EA$ 2,500.OO $ 10,000
- 610.00.01 Riprap 20 CUM $ 70.00 $ 1,400
611.00.01 Class A Concrete Slope Pavement 100 SM $ 30.00 $ 3,000 - 613.00.01 Type L Curb and Gutter 1550 LM $ 15.00 $ 23,250
613.00.02 Type L Island Curb and Gutter 150 LM $ 30.00 $ 4.500
613.00.03 Tack on Island Curb 250 LM $ 30.00 $ 7,500
613.00.04 Type 1 Curb and Gutter (NDOT) 280 LM $ 30.00 $ 8,400
613.00.05 Type 8 Curb and Gutter (NDOT) 450 LM $ 30.00 $ 13.500 - 613.00.06 Concrete Driveway 320 SM $ 45.00 $ 14.400
613.00.07 Concrete Sidewalk 630 SM $ 35.00 $ 22.050 ‘d 613.00.08 Valley Gutter 230 SM $ 45.00 $ 10.350
4OF7 1-15 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE
BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JP( Date 10/27/% 1
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY w UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT - 616.00.01 Chain Link Fence 1480 LM $ 30.00 $ 44,400
618.00.01 Galvanized Guardrail (Triple Corrugation) 70 LM $ 150.00 $ 10,500-
618.00.02 Modified Eccentric Loader Terminal (MELT) 1 EA $ 2,ooo.oo $ 2,000
621 .OO.Ol Type III Survey Monument 50 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 75,000
622.00.01 Construction Surveying 1 LS $ 500,000.00 $ 500.000~
623.00.01 Remove and Reset Street Light 21 EA $ 1,500.oo $ 31,500
623.00.02 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at Oakey 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000- and Western 623.00.03 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000 - Charleston and Shadow 623.00.04 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 LS $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000 Charleston and MLK 623.00.05 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 Is $ 30,000.00 $ 30,~- Charleston and Grand Central 623.00.06 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 L-s $ 1 o,ooo.oo $ 10.000 Charleston and Commerce - 623.00.07 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 Is $ 1 o,ooo.oo $ 10,000 Charleston and Main 623.00.08 Maintain and Restore Traffic Signal at 1 LS $ 1 o,ooo.oo $ 1 o.ooo~- Charleston and Casino Center 623.00.09 Remove and Restore Traffic Signal at Oakey 1 LS $ 75,ooo.oo $ 75.000 and MLK 624.00.01 Accommodations for Public Traffic 1 LS $ 750,000.00 $ 750,000-
627.00.01 Remove and Reset Signs 59 EA $ 500.00 $ 29.500
627.00.02 Remove and Reset Sign Bridge 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15.000
628.00.01 Permanent Pavement Marking Film “Only” 13 EA$ 210.00 $ 2.730- Legend 628.00.02 Permanent Pavement Marking Film “Arrow” 28 EA $ 210.00 $ 5,880 Legend - 628.00.03 Permanent Pavement Marking Film “Stop” 5 EA $ 210.00 $ 1.050 Legend 628.00.04 Permanent Pavement Marking Film “Crosswalks 450 SM $ 120.00 $ 54.000-- and Stopbars” Legend 628.00.05 Permanent Pavement Marking Film (Yellow) 70 SM $ 120.00 $ 8” - 628.00.06 Permanent Pavement Marking Film (White) 20 SM $ 120.00 $ 2.400
-. 5OF7 I=1 5 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN Date 1 o/27/99 BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JPC 1, Date 10127199
- BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY yNJ UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT 628.00.07 Painted Pavement Striping (150 mm Solid White) 3140 LM $ 3.00 $ 9,420 - 628.00.08 Painted Pavement Striping (150 mm Solid 550 LM $ 3.00 $ 1,650 Yellow) .- 629.00.01 150 mm Water Pipe 490 LM $ 120.00 $ 58,800
629.00.02 200 mm Water Pipe 520 LM $ 120.00 $ 62,400
629.00.03 400 mm Water Pipe 150 LM $ 550.00 $ 82,500
629.00.04 750 mm Water Pipe 70 LM $ 700.00 $ 49,000
629.00.05 900 mm Water Pipe 60 LM $ 800.00 $ 48,000 - 629.00.06 750 mm Steel Casing 20 LM $ 500.00 $ 10,000
629.00.07 400 mm Line Stop Assembly 2 EA $ 15,000.00 $ 30,000 -._ 629.00.08 900 mm Line Stop Assembly 4 EA $ 50,000.00 $ 200,000
-- 629.00.09 900 mm x 750 mm Wet Tap Assembly 4 EA $ 56,OOO.OO $ 224,000
629.00.10 900 mm x 200 mm Wet Tap Assembly 1 EA$ 40,000.00 $ 40,000 - 629.00.11 150 mm Gate Valve 9 EA $ 2,500.OO $ 22,500
- 629.00.12 200 mm Gate Valve 3 EA $ 3,ooo.oo $ 9,000
629.00.13 Reconnect Existing Water Service 51 EA $ 2,ooo.oo $ 102,000
629.00.14 Reconnect Existing Fire Hydrant 4 EA $ 2,ooo.oo $ 8,000
629.00-l 5 Adjust Value 7 EA $ 500.00 $ 3.500
630.00.01 200 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 1730 LM $ 115.00 $ 198.950
630.00.02 250 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 480 LM $ 125.00 $ 60,000
630.00.03 300 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 170 LM $ 145.00 $ 24,650 - 630.00.04 375 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 400 LM $ 155.00 $ 62.000
- 630.00.05 450 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 20 LM $ 165.00 $ 3.300 \d 630.00.06 750 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 330 LM $ 650.00 $ 214,500
6OF7
- I-1 5 FREEWAY CHANNEL ENGINEER’S COST ESTIMATE Made by KFN - Date 1 O/27& BID NO. 00.1730.03 Checked by JF’ 1 Date 10/27/tia -
BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY w UNIT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT - 630.00.07 750 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe (Mircotunnel) 480 LM $ 3,300.oo $ 1 S84.006
630.00.08 1350 mm Sanitary Sewer Pipe 10 LM $ 600.00 $ 6.000
630.00.09 Reconnect Existing Sanitary Sewer Lateral 70 EA $ 2,500.OO $ 175,OOL
630.00.10 Connection to 1350mm Sanitary Sewer 3 EA $ 1 ,ooo.oo $ 3.001-
12,ooo.oo 36,000 630.00.11 Concrete Encasement (1350 mm Pipe) 3 EA $ $ -
633.00.01 Non-reflective Pavement Markers 5593 EA $ 2.00 $ 11.181
633.00.02 Reflective Pavement Markers 1996 EA $ 3.00 $ 5,98i-
680.00.01 Cellular Concrete Mat (Closed Cell) 236 SM $ 45.00 $ 10.602 -
SUBTOTAL $27,56Q -aga_
CONSTRUCTION CONFLICTS AND ADDITIONAL WORK (7.5%) $ 1,500,ul)cr
CONSTRUCTION COST SUBTOTAL $29,060,051-
INCENTIVES $ 100,000
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $29,160,051-
SUBTOTAL $29,160,051--
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $ 1,600,OOO - ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $30,760,051
SAY $ 30,770,OOO --
7OF7 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: - AMEND THE TEN YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM / FREEWAY CHANNEL - SYSTEM (LAS.09.L.98)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
- STAFF: Approve.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Approve.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve. CLARK COUNTY I REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE CITY’S 10 YEAR PLAN SO ADDITIONAL FUNDS CAN BE SECURED FOR THE FREEWAY CHANNEL PROJECT - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA - AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA.
FISCAL IMPACT: -
None by this action. -,-- BACKGROUND:
The City is requesting an additional $2,800,000 to fund the Freeway Channel Project. This cost - increase is a result of the revised cost estimates between the 30% level, when $28,000,000 in bond money was set aside, and the 90% plans. Please note that we have moved the Gowan North - Buffalo Branch Project from Year 1 to Year 3 and the Las Vegas Wash - Ranch0 Project -- (LVRA 0000 - 0091) from Year 3 to Year 6. -
Respecffully Submitted, TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA -- ITEM# 1OB ITEM# 13B DATE: 11/18/99 DA-I-E: 12/09/99 -f--l - / &fi Department of Pdblic Works Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
‘\/ Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/08/99
7. AMEND THE TEN YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM / FREEWAY CHANNEL SYSTEM (LAS.09.L.98)
The City of Las Vegas has requested an amendment to the Ten Year Construction Program and current yeaI project list to increase construction funding in the current year for the Freeway Channel Project from Alts Drive to Sahara Boulevard. This will allow for District reimbursement of City funds provided to facilitate construction contract award. To compensate, funds programmed for the Gowan North - Buffalo Branch ant Las Vegas Wash - Ranch0 projects have been moved back. The backup includes the affected portion of the Ten Year Plan.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve.
- Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
Approve. .- I Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
Approve.
!0999las09198-lOyr.aid 1 O-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Adopted June 10, 1999 Revised to show amendments awwroveo
Faclllty Description Area Per MPU Notes LAS VEGAS (Central Las Vegas Valley) : Freeway Channel - Alta to Desert inn Central $24.452.100 (FW15 0000 thru 0301) 116.5 Gowan North - Buffalo & Teneya Branches & Upper Gowan Outfall Gowan $5.360.000 50/50 WIRTC
LCME OOOU - 0019 101.5 0.3ot Owens Avenue System Central $6.126,COO Funded (LVOW CC00 thru 0146) 1 99.5jWith RTC 1 I I 2.913 I Gowan N. Channel - N. Det. Basin to 1 Gowan 1 S12.lll.OOOI I I ILone Mtn. (GONO - 0009 thru 0205) I I ~’ ...--- I w.51 I I 1 O-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Adopted June 10, 1999 SECOND FIVE YEARS 7/2004 THRlJ 7/2005 Revised to show amendments approve0 FVO4/05 FVO5lO6 FVO6f 07 FVO7/08 woafo9 8/12/99, 9/9/99, 10/14/99, 1 l/10/99,12/9/99
LAS VEGAS (Central Las Vegas Valley) : Freeway Channel - Alto to Desert inn Central $24.452.100 (FW15 0000 thru 0301) 116.5 0.641 4.27’ Gowan North - Buffalo & Teneya Branches & Upper Gowan Outfall Gowon $5,360.000 (GOBU. GOTE. GOOF-0775) 106.5 Washington Ave. System - 115 to Mortln Central $754,000 Luther Klng (LVl5-0229 thru 0339) 105.5 Gowan North - El Capltan Branch Gowan $4,177,000 (GOEC-0000 thru 0176) 103.5 3.777 Las Vegas Wash - Roncho Central S2,655.000 (LVRA-OOOO thru 0091) ’ 103.0 2.355 Meadows Detention Basin & Outfall Central $1,343,2OO LCME 0000 - 0019 101.5 1.343 Owens Avenue System Central $6.126.000 Funded (LVOW OfXl thru 0146) 99.5 With RTC Gowan N. Channel - N. Det. Basin to Gowan $12,111,000 4lexander to Lone Mtn. Lone Mtn. (GONO - 0009 thru 0205) 99.5 3.816 Gowan Outfall Lone Mtn. Branch Gowan $3,9oO,OM) (GOLO-OOUO thru 0076) 97.5 0.400 3.000 0.400 3.000 Gowan North Channel - Lone Mtn. To Gowan $11.978,900 CAM-10 (GONO- thru 0589) 97.0 1.000 9.048 0.450 2.930 Gowan Outfall Craig to Channel Gowan $752,300 GOOF - 0198 96.0 Lone Mtn. System - Outfall to Durango Gowan S1.767000 (GOLM - 0000 thru 0101) 94.0 Las Vegas Wash - Smoke Ranch Central $917,100 LVSR - 0552 93.0 Los Vegas Creek Channel - Parallel System Gowan $9,421,700 LCCP 0000 - 0286 93.0 3.000 Gowan South Det. Basin Gowan $1.675.000 Expansion (GOSO-0051) 90.5 1.525 Totals per Fiscal Year ( x S 1,OOO.OOO) 6.171 6.777 4.260 12.048 11.699 Las Vegas IO-Year Total : 55,843,OOO
2 of 2 99-00-l OYR-PLAN.xls, IO-YR, 1 l/16/1 999, 8:30 AM CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: - FREEWAY CHANNEL, ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY - INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS:i)9.0.99)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve.
TECHNICAL ADVISORY: Approve. Vote: 7 Ayes - 1 Nay (City of Mesquite TAC Representative).
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve.
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #13C DATE: 12/09/99 L CLARK COUNTY - REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ./1 AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
INTERLOCAL CONTRACT - FREEWAY CHANNEL - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA PETITIONER:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE FREEWAY CHANNEL - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA.
. FISCAL IMPACT:
Construction: $29,200,000 Construction Engineering and Administration: $ 1,600,OOO Total $30,800,000
BACKGROUND:
The City is requesting funding for construction of the Freeway Channel drainage facilities as shown in the CCRFCD Master Plan Update by FWCH 0000, FW15 0038, FW15 0089, FW15 0150, FWOK 0000, FWUP 0000, and FWUP 0059. The main system of the freeway channel - project lies adjacent to I-15 between Alta Drive and Sahara Avenue. Additional MPU facilities connect to the main system at Western Avenue, Charleston Boulevard, and Oakey Boulevard, _ collectively these facilities are the Freeway Channel Project. The project will collect flows that have historically drained into and flooded the Charleston Underpass. This project will provide protection to many downstream properties which currently suffer severe flooding even during - minor storm events.
- Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT -
ii Staff Discussion: Date: 1 l/29/99 FREEWAY CHANNEL, ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVENUE AND BYPASS FACILITY INTERLOCAL CONTRACT (LAS.09.0.99)
The City of Las Vegas has requested an interlocal contract in the amount of $30800,000 to fund the construction and construction engineering for the Freeway Channel, Alta Drive to SaharaAvenue and Bypass Facility. Funding will be provided as follows:
Pronosed Funding
Construction $29,200,000 Construction Engineering 1.600,OOO Total ILC Value $ 30,800,OOO
On April 81999 the Board took action to earmark $280 13,000 of the 1998 Bond proceeds for this project. The City of Las Vegas intends to provide $2,787,000 to facilitate a timely award of a construction contract. This interlocal contract includes language that will allow for reimbursement of funds provided by the City of Las Vegas in excess of the $28,013,000 dependent upon revenue availability. The District Attorney has reviewed the contract. Additional information submitted by City staff after the TAC meeting revealed that right-of-entry condemnation proceedings have commenced.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
Vote: 7 Ayes - 1 Nay (City of Mesquite TAC representative).
Recommendation:
Approve.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: ----liizEq
Recommendation: - -\d Approve.
!09991as09o99ilcaid INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE FREEWAY CHANNEL - ALTA DRIVE TO SAHARA AVFXUE AND BYPASS FACILITY .--Y FROM WALL STREET TO SAHARA AVENUE -
THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT, made and entered into as of the day of - , 1999 by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT" and the City of Las Vegas, - hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
WITNESSETH - WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the DISTRICT may approve a project to design and construct flood control improvements; and -
WHEREAS, the flood control improvements proposed herein are the same as those identified in the Master Plan No. 1997 , Structure No. FW15 0038, 0089, - 0150, FWUP 0000 and 0059, FWCH 0000 and FWOK 0000 hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and - WHEREAS, the PROJECT is identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A"; and -,- WHEREAS, the PROJECT has been approved by the DISTRICT on its annual project priority list; and - WHEREAS, the PROJECT has regional flood control significance and is located in the same hydrographic area as Clark County, City of Henderson, the City of Las Vegas and the City of North Las Vegas; and -
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT agrees to retroactively reimburse the CITY for all costs associated with the construction of the PROJECT to a limit described in - Section II Paragraph 3 as funds become available; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions, contracts, and promises of the parties hereto, the DISTRICT and the CITY agree to the following:
SECTION I - SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
THIS INTERLOCAL CONTRACT applies to all costs for construction administration, construction engineering, and construction costs to place in - service the Freeway Channel from Alta Drive to Sahara Avenue and the Freeway Channel Bypass Facility from Wall Street to Sahara Avenue. The basic -- improvements shall consist of flood water facilities including pipes, channels, dikes, energy dissipators, channel structures, channel access and other
- 1 appurtenances as may be necessary to control floodwaters. The improvements shall be funded through DISTRICT funds as herein described. This PROJECT is further identified and shown on the attached Exhibit "A". u
- SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS The DISTRICT agrees to fund PROJECT costs within the limits specified below: - 1. Construction costs shall not exceed $29,200,000
2. Construction engineering shall not exceed $1,600,000
3. The total cost of this Contract shall not exceed $30,800,000 which includes all Items described in Paragraphs one and two above.
4. As a result of the limited funds available to the DISTRICT to fund the total cost of the PROJECT as set forth above, the CITY will make an inter-fund transfer to itself in the amount of $2,787,000 to allow for the award of this PROJECT. City funds shall remain available for the PROJECT until such time as DISTRICT funds become available and are allocated to the PROJECT by the DISTRICT. The DISTRICT will initially allocate $28,013,000. The DISTRICT agrees to place the PROJECT on the priority list for funding following approval of this interlocal agreement. The remaining funding for
-.-..l the PROJECT will be provided to the CITY based upon the PROJECT's position on the DISTRICT's project and priority list, as solely determined by the DISTRICT and the subsequent allocation of the remaining funds by the DISTRICT. The DISTRICT funds shall be used first to fund construction engineering and then to fund the - construction costs. All available DISTRICT funds for this PROJECT will be utilized prior to the expenditure of any City funds.
- 5. A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and approved by the Board to reallocate funds between phases of the project. No other approval by the Lead Entity is required.
6. A written request must be made to the DISTRICT and a supplemental interlocal contract approved by the Board to increase the total cost of the contract noted above prior to payment of any additional funds.
-
SECTION III - GENERAL - 1. The title sheet of both the plans and the specifications shall show .-4 the Regional Flood Control District of Clark County as the funding - agency.
2 2. The award of bid for this PROJECT shall occur no later than July - 31, 2000. The CITY will take all reasonable steps possible to - avoid delays in the construction of DISTRICT funded projects. Project delays more than four months, as measured from the award A - date, may be subject to a formal review by both the Technical Advisory Committee and the District Board of Directors. At the review, the CITY will have an opportunity to present information relative to the delays, measures taken to avoid the delays and the likelihood of those delays continuing. The Board will make a determination, in view of the delays and limited available funding, whether project funding should continue. In the case that the Board chooses to discontinue funding, the Board may cancel any Interlocal Contract(s) associated with the project and discontinue funding for the remainder of the project. Funding already spent or appropriated by the CITY will not be required to be refunded to the District. Project funding can be reconsidered at any time when the CITY can demonstrate that the project can proceed on an acceptable schedule. - 3. The CITY will comply with the Local Purchasing Act, Chapter 332 and Public Works Projects, Chapter 338, of the Nevada Revised Statutes. -- 4. The CITY, its employees and representatives shall at all times comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, statutes, rules and regulations in effect at the time work is performed on the PROJECT. -
5. The CITY will require appropriate financial security for PROJECT construction.
6. The CITY shall provide all impacted entities and the DISTRICT with the opportunity to provide the CITY with input relative to the following processes: scope of services development; consultant selection; design, construction and maintenance review; and monitoring of the effectiveness and impacts of facilities on flood flows.
7. Applicable portions of the current editions of the Policies and - Procedures, the Hydrologic Criteria and Drainage Design Manual, and Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage adopted by the - DISTRICT will apply in developing this PROJECT unless specifically superseded by the CONTRACT. - 8. Purchases of right-of-way in excess of that actually needed for construction will not be allowed unless a comparison between the - cost of excess acquisition and needed acquisition, including - , damages, indicates that benefits from such a transaction would
- 3 result. Title to residual property will be vested in the name of the CITY. Revenues derived from the sale of these properties, less the cost of the sale of these properties, will be forwarded to the DISTRICT.
9. Administrative settlements and acceptance of counter offers involving right-of-way may only be made following a review and - approval by the DISTRICT. 10. The DISTRICT will reimburse the CITY, or make payment directly to its contractor or its consultant, each month for project costs as outlined in SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS. Invoices must identify and allocate all costs to the categories noted below:
a. Right-of-Way acquisition including appraisals, title and escrow, negotiations, legal fees, recording fees, etc.
b. PreDesign Engineering (all work prior to design, excluding right-of-way)
C. Design Engineering
d. Construction Engineering
e. Construction (all work after award of construction contract)
f. Environmental: costs incurred by the entity for the preparation of environmental documentation applicable to the project and costs incurred for the implementation of mitigation measures provided in an environmental document (e.g. , EIS OR EA).
Other including landscaping, flood insurance rate map amendments or revisions, etc.
11. Accurate documentation of all work performed and payments made will be maintained by the CITY for a period of three (3) years in hard copy form after final project approval and payment. Following the three-year period, the CITY shall keep records for permanent storage in original form or in microfilm/fiche media.
12. The DISTRICT reserves the right to review and/or audit all records pertaining to all projects both during and after project completion. - 13. The CITY will be responsible for any loss, damage, liability, cost or expense caused by the actions or inactions of its employees, - consultants, contractors or agents arising under this Contract and
d hereby holds the DISTRICT harmless therefrom.
-
4 C
14. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to this PROJECT will be - refunded by the CITY to the DISTRICT. ‘f-Y 15. The items covered in SECTION II - PROJECT COSTS must be completed - to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT prior to July 31, 2004. The DISTRICT may, at any time thereafter, grant extensions or terminate this Contract after thirty (30) days notice.
Date Of District Action: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
- BY: ATTEST LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, CHAIRMAN
- CAROLYN FRAZIER Secretary to the Board - Approved as to Form:
DATE OF COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
BY: ATTEST OSCAR B. GOODMAN, MAYOR
BARBARA JO RONEMUS, CITY CLERK
f:\depot\rtc-rfcd\freeway channel\fwycha alta Sahara const 102699.doc
- --
LEGEND ALTA tt * l l ’ Future Regional Facilities Existing Regional Facilities if@+/ ProposedRegional Facilities Street Centerlines
VALL
/I FWOKOOOO
fc channekapr we/ CITY OF LAS VEGAS EXHIBITA - FREEWAY CHANlvEL (ALTA TO SAHARA) CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
2000 FLOOD ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve.
CITIZENS ADVISORY: Approve, subject to CAC review of the public relations portion of the campaign.
RFCD AGENDA ITEM #14 DATE: 12/09/99 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN PETITIONER:
GALE WM. FRASER, II, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER/CHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE MERICA AGENCY ON THE 1999 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN; RESULTS OF A FLOOD AWARENESS SURVEY; RECEIVE AND DISCUSS A PROPOSAL FOR THE 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN; OR TAKE ACTION DEEMED APPROPRIATE
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY99/00 Budget includes $225,000 for Flood Safety Advertising Services.
BACKGROUND:
Currently, the District has a contract for the 1999 Campaign with The-Merica Agency for Flood Safety Advertising Services which is due to expire on February 3,200O. The contract before the Board will be the final option to extend under the original contract that the Board approved in 1997.
In September 1999, the District contracted with a commercial survey firm ( The Source) to conduct a flood awareness survey of 500 Clark County residents. The telephone survey revealed that 8 1.6 percent of Clark County residents named “Flash Flooding” as a type of natural disaster that could be a danger to Clark County residents in an “unaided” response. Those respondents that did not spontaneously say flash flooding, were asked if they were aware of the dangers of flash flooding in Clark County. In the aided or prompted situation, 15.8 percent said they were aware-thus providing a total awareness of 97.4 percent (unaided 81.6% + aided 15.8%). It should be noted that the survey results have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percent at the 95 percent level of confidence.
Overall the District found that the awareness of the dangers of flash flooding was very high. In reviewing the data collected, it appears that older residents (primarily residents 65 years old and older) were not as aware as other segments of the population. Staff and The Merica Agency have developed a segment of the 2000 Campaign to target our senior residents. There are three senior publications in Clark County that the District will place advertisements in during the upcoming campaign. Attached to this staff report is the Executive Summary from the survey for the Board’s information.
In order to wrap-up the 1999 Campaign, The Merica Agency will present a summary report highlighting the major components of the campaign and its success.
A proposal for the 2000 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign is included in the backup and will be presented by The Merica Agency at the meeting. The proposal is based on a one-year extension of the current contract in the amount of $225,000. To facilitate the discussion on the components for the 2000 Campaign, staff has prepared a historical perspective of the Flood Safety Advertising contract, which shows a chronological summary of the advertising pieces used, the contract amount, and the amount expended for the eight years of this program.
The contract and Scope of Services for the 2000 Advertising Campaign is attached for the Board’s consideration. The contract has been reviewed and approved by the Deputy District Attorney. The CAC reviewed the contract and Scope of Services at their November 29,1999, meeting and recommend approval of the contract extension.
- Staff is requesting that the Board discuss the proposal for the 2000 Flood Safety Advertising Campaign and direct staff as deemed appropriate.
--
Respectfully submitted, -
- Gale Wm. Fraser, II, P.E. General Manager/Chief Engineer - - II, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Five hundred respondents, composing a representative sample of Clark County adult residents, were interviewed by telephone during the first half of October, 1999. Fifty-nine percent were women and 41% were men. Their median age is 49.4 years, they’ve lived in Clark County an average of 9.8 years, and there are 2.3 household members.
When asked if they could name the types of natural disasters that can be a danger to Clark County residents, 81.6% said “Flash Flooding/Flooding,” significantly more than all other mentions, which included earthquakes (37.2%), wind/dust/sand storms (14.00/o),fires (11.0%) tornados (6.0%) and several other natural and non-natural dangers. By sub-sample, “Flash Flooding/Flooding” was named more frequently by those under 50 years old and households with three or more members. There were no significant differences in flooding mentions by years lived in Clark County, gender, or area of Clark County lived in.
Those who did not spontaneously say flooding were asked if they were aware of the dangers of flash flooding in Clark County. In this aided or prompted situation, 15.8% said they were, thus providing a total awareness of 97.4% (unaided 8 1.6% + aided 15.8%).
Awareness of Dangers of Flash Floods
2.6% 15.6%
UNAIDED AIDED m UNAWARE Although total awareness numbers are at a very high level overall, women (99.0%) are significantly more aware of flooding dangers than men (95.1%). There are no other significant differences by sub-sample.
Because of the very high level of total awareness, differences were looked at within the category of unaided awareness - those who had “top of mind,” unprompted awareness compared to those who did not say flooding when probed for natural disaster dangers in Clark County.
Interestingly, those who did not at first say flooding are significantly older (58.5 years) than those who did say flooding (47.9 years). More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of those who did not initially say flooding are 65 years or older while a greater proportion of those who did say flooding are between 30 and 49 years old This can be observed in the following chart by looking at the differences within each age group. The higher the “Yes” (said “flooding”), the better. -.-A Unaided Awareness 50 - 1
2 40- - 3 B 2 30- - B a b!i 20- - ti fj lo-
- UNDER 30 30-49 50164 658 ~DER ’ AGE OF RESPONDENT
4 Correlated with age is household size. Generally, older households tend to be one or two person households. A difference in unaided awareness was also discovered in the household size variable. Those who did not initially say flooding have smaller households (1.9 members), while those who did say flooding have larger households (24 members).
More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of those who did not say flooding are in one or two person households, while those who did say flooding are in three or larger person households. Unaided Awareness 80 1
-
l-2 '3+ SIZE OF HOUSEHOLD
When those who are aware of flooding dangers were asked how they learned about the dangers of flash flooding in Clark County, by far the most frequent response (67.4%) was that they learned about it “by living here/seeing it happen/through personal experience.” Other mentions, in
-5- - rank order, were TV (14.0%), news-unspecified (11.3%) TV news (9.4%). newspaper (6.4%) family/parents/friends (3.3%), radio (2.3%) and many others which are all less than 2% of the sample.
Respondents were then asked whether they had heard or read about flash flooding dangers from eleven specified sources, which were read to them one at a time. In this aided situation, TV News (96.9%) was cited significantly more than all other sources. And although the Flood Control District does not, to our knowledge, do much in the way of TV advertising, TV Advertising was selected as the second most frequent source (74.9%). This may be due to a “halo effect,” wherein people get so much information from TV they may have considered any type of flood warning on television as a form of advertising. Following is the complete list of sources in rank order. - 96.9% TV News 74.9% TV Advertising 74.5% Newspaper or Magazine Story 65.1% Radio News 53.2% Newspaper of Magazine Ad - 50.7% Radio Advertising 46.6% Friends or Relatives - 39.4% Billboard 20.1% Brochure 16.0% Children 12.3% Bus Stop Shelter Ad
There are some interesting sub-sample differences for these flood information sources. Younger (under 50) residents are significantly more likely than older residents to cite TV News, TV Advertising, Radio News, Radio Advertising, Friends or Relatives, Billboard, Children and Bus Stop Shelter Ad Larger (3+) households are significantly more likely than smaller households to cite Newspaper or Magazine Ad, Radio Advertising, Friends or Relatives, Billboard and Children. And those living in Clark County 6 or more years are significantly more likely than newer residents to cite Newspaper or Magazine Ad, Brochure and Children
There are also some differences in flood information sources by geographic area. Residents in the Northeast and Southeast valley are significantly more likely to say Newspaper or Magazine Story and Friends and Relatives than residents in the Northwest valley. Residents in the Southwest valley are significantly more likely to say Billboard than residents in the Northeast or Southeast. Residents in the Hispanic area are significantly more likely to say Newspaper or Magazine Ad than Green Valley residents, while Green Valley residents are more likely to say Billboard than Hispanic area residents.
. A great majority (95.4%) of these residents remember the July 8th flooding. Of those who recalled it, 29.4% said they were affected by it. Younger (under 50) residents were more likely to have been affected by it than older residents. The most frequent way they were affected was “driving delay/getting around” (31.4%). Other mentions, in rank order, were “car/truck damage” ( 15.0%) “home water damage” (14.3%) “couldn’t get home” (lO.O%), “couldn’t get out of home” (8.6%), “couldn’t get to work” (7.1%), “our street flooded” (5.7%), and several other mentions, all less than 3%.
Finally, residents were asked if they believed that other household - members are aware of the dangers of flooding. These respondents felt that virtually all of the other adults in the household were aware (99.5%), virtually all of the teen-agers (98.6%) and three-fourths (74.5%) of the younger children were aware of flash flooding dangers.
-7- III, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
There is a very high level of awareness of the dangers of flash flooding throughout Clark County. This may be due in part to the July 8th “ 100 Year Flood,” which is still fresh in many residents’ minds.
Based on’the high awareness level, flood danger advertising is in the third, or retentive, stage of advertising. As time passesand should there not be any serious flooding for a while, it is advisable that a retentive advertising campaign be run to remind old residents and educate new ressdents about the dangers of flash flooding.
Other than experiencing flash flooding first hand, TV news is the primary source of information about flash flooding, &en it happens Based on this study, it would appear that radio and billboards are effective advertising ways to remind residents about flash flooding, and if it can be -4 afforded - TV advertising. Bus stop shelter ads do not appear to reach a large audience because most residents may not see them, and those who do see them may not register them - Based on this study, it would appear that an effective allocation of - increased advertising dollars be directed toward older residents, those primarily 65 years and older. This can be accomplished by advertising in senior publications, radio stations that target seniors, and any other media - outlets that appeal to seniors.
-
-
- r
FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES A HISTORY
1999: THE MERICA AGENCY $200,000 contract Spent: $189,83 1 (As of 10/28/99) not committed: $10,169 - Invoices outstanding - Billboards (year 2 of vinyls) - Busstop Shelter Signage - - Radio Traffic Reports - Fox 5 Rids Club - Print Media - Stickers - Anderson Dairy Milk Cartons (Flash Flood Safety & NPDES) - RFCD Brochure Update
1998: THE MERICA AGENCY $175,000 contract Spent: $153,198.57 (As of 02/08/99) not committed: $21,801
- Billboards (year 1 of vinyls) - Radio Traffic Reports - Fox 5 Rids Club - Magazine (Welcome Home) - Anderson Dairy Milk Cartons (Flash Flood Safety & NPDES) - RFCD Brochure Update - 1997: MERICA DICKERSON $100,000 contract Spent: $97,676 - - Billboards (year 3 of vinyls) - Fox 5 Rids Club - Promotional Stickers - Anderson Dairy Milk Cartons (Flash Flood Safety & NPDES) - RFCD Brochure Update
1996: MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON $100,000 contract Spent: $92,948
- Billboards (year 2 of vinyls) - RJ Bag Wrappers (1 million) - - Anderson Dairy Milk Cartons (Flash Flood Safety & NPDES) - Plastic Rulers with Flood Safety Message (5,000 ea/6 inch rulers) - RI: “Ideas for Rids” summer package (flood safety message/maze) 1995: MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON $100,000 contract Spent: $87,400
- Billboards (year 1 of vinyls) - Posters (1,000/8.5 x 11 inches) - Anderson Dairy Milk Carton (Flash Flood Safety) - - Brochure rewrite
1994: MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON $180,000 contract Spent: $152,000
- Billboards (painted) - Fox 5 Kids Club - RJ Bag Wrappers (2 million) - TV ads during Flood Awareness Week (reused spots) - Radio: SKYVIEW Traffc/KDOL Radio (Spanish station) - Newspaper ads: Flood Awareness Week message (Boulder City, Henderson, Moapa Valley, Mesquite, Laughlin, & Hispanic newspaper) - Brochures (update) - Posters: 100 ea (8.5 x 11 inches) - Anderson Dairy Milk Carton (Flash Flood Safety)
1993: MJGUCA, BURCH & DICKERSON $170,000 contract Spent: $137,000
- Billboards (painted) - Fox 5 Kids Club - TV ads flood safety/FOX 5 Kids Club - Radio: SKYVIEW Traffic - - Newspaper ads: Flood Awareness Week message (Boulder City, Henderson, Moapa Valley, Mesquite, Laughlin, & Hispanic newspaper) - Posters: 3,000 ea (22 x 28 inches) - - Anderson Dairy Milk Carton (Flash Flood Safety)
1992: MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON - $150,000 contract Spent: $141,000
- Billboards (painted) - Fox 5 Kids Club - TV ads flood safety (incl. production) - Radio: SKYVJEW Traffic - Brochure - RJ Newspaper Bag Wrappers (1 million) - Anderson Dairy Milk Carton (Flash Flood Safety) -
-4 i:\history.wpd -- 1 -
Clark County Regional Flood Control District
2000 Campaign
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
- : .
Proposed Staffing and Organization
Joe Merica, President Joe Merica loves his job as ad agency president and each day enjoys working with more than SO creative and energetic people producing exciting, cutting edge advertising and public relations. in addition to overseeing the agency’s public relations, Joe combines his creative talents and business acumen to work with the agency’s creative department. The result is award-winning advertising campaigns for our clients.
A University of N_evada journalism graduate, Joe has worked as a newspaper reporter and editor. He is a former press secretary to Nevada Governor Richard Brian and in 1978 was named Outstanding Young Journalist in the state. He also served as past president of the Las Vegas Executives Association, and was named “Agency Executive of the Year” in 1993. Joe is currently a member of the Nevada Development Authority and a member of the YMCA’s Century Club.
Since 1992, Joe has overseen the implementation and the execution of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District marketing and advertising awareness campaign proposed by The Merica Agency. His interest in the safety of the public from flooding has been evident with his role and involvement with RFCD. Joe is very -- familiar with and has even experienced first hand the dangers of flooding throughout his many years residing in Las Vegas. With the development and continuing growth of the Las Vegas Valley and the Clark County area, Joe’s experience adds a great deal to the work that is done for the RFCD.
- Martv Wood, Vice President Marty, who has been in Las Vegas since the age of three, brings to his Account Supervisor position sixteen years of experience. His marketing experience began - with Valley Bank as a Product Manager in the marketing department. From that point, Wood moved on to work at R&R Advertising for eight years, where he was a member of the agency’s management team and worked on such accounts as Sam’s -- Town Hotel and Gambling Hall, Southwest Gas Corporation and Primerit Bank.
Since starting at The Merica Agency, Marty has been the Account Supervisor for the - RFCD. His many years of marketing experience constantly comes into play in .’ .. managing this account. Marty believes that the agency is truly an extension of the client, a relationship built on trust and partnership. Anticipating needs, thinking - strategically and consistently being there every step of the way is how Marty ’ approaches his work for such clients as the RFCD, MGM Grand Hotel & Casino, New York-New York Hotel & Casino, Sam’s Town Gambling Hall & Hotel, Lewis Homes of Nevada, Canyon Gate Country Club and First Security Bank.
‘d 1 Hien Nguyen, Account Executive - After earning an honors degree in Mass Communications from the University of California, Berkeley, Hien Nguyen began her advertising and marketing career in San Francisco before settling back in Nevada where she grew up. As a native of Las Vegas, she has very strong ties and commitment to the community. Ms. Nguyen has - handled a wide range of accounts in gaming, real estate, health care and political campaigns, including the Justice Bond and the Clark County School Bond.
Joan luneblut, Outback Media Director Joan Jungblut joined the agency more than 11 years ago in a support capacity, then - quickly moved into the media department where she has developed and refined her media planning and negotiating skills. Known for doing her homework and her keen _ understanding of the media market, Joan has earned the respect of local media and has developed solid relationships with general managers and sales representatives. Clients such as COX Communications, Lake Las Vegas Resort, MGM Grand Hotel & _ Casino, New York-New York Hotel & Casino have prospered through her skills.
Joan prides herself in having a true understanding of the complete media mix and also understands the importance of using the appropriate media venue. She /--.- provides her clients with the best possible recommendation for the monies available.
Sandi Varvel, Public Relations Account Executive Sandi joined Faiss Foley Merica Public Relations and Government Affairs in November 1995. Before coming to the agency, Sandi was employed for four years as a features assistant and contributing writer at the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Born and raised in Kansas, Sandi began her journalism career at the age of 15 and served as a sports writer, theatre critic and general features reporter during her eight years in the newspaper business. While attending Kansas State University on a theatre scholarship, Sandi also studied advertising and journalism. At Faiss Foley Merica, Sandi handles public relations duties for Lake Las Vegas Resort, Canyon Gate Country Club, China Grill Management Group (including China Grill, China Grill Cafe, rumjungle and Red Square), NEONoPOLiS 63 The Fremont Street Experience, Community Bank of Nevada, NEXTLINK Nevada, AmLand Development, Preferred Travel Services, The 20th Anniversary of Sam’s Town Hotel and Gambling Hall, and the Boy Scouts of America Invitational Golf Tournament. Sandi has also worked with Texas Station, the Desert Inn Resort, Citibank and VLC, Inc.
-
2 Kenny Shore, Creative Director With over 40 Addy and EMA awards to his credit, one might say that while the advertising business has been good to Kenny Shore, Kenny Shore has most certainly been good to the advertising business and the clients who have benefited from his creative expertise. Among Kenny’s most notable work is a seven-spot television campaign for KOMP radio station which has been syndicated nationwide, many successful campaigns for Texas Station Gambling Hall & Hotel, and print and radio campaigns for Busch Gardens in Tampa Bay. Kenny has been an integral part of many high-profile accounts including McDonald’s, L.A. Yogurt, First Security Bank, Hallmark, The Boulevard Mall, Cashman Cadillac and Comstock Bank. Before settling at The Merica Agency, Kenny worked as a creative director for two local agencies and owned his own creative services business. He is a proud graduate of the University of Oklahoma and with the proper motivation can still sing “Boomer Sooner”.
Troy O’Brien, Designer Troy came to the agency with a Certificate in Graphic Design from the University of California, Berkeley. This native Australian’s remarkable background brings a unique perspective to his art direction. Having worked as an account executive for a number of years, he has a keen appreciation of exactly how hard his concepts and designs need to work to produce results, His ideas are always on target, smart and stylish. Troy has seven years of agency experience and has worked on several of the agency’s high-profile accounts including MGM Grand Hotel & Casino, Lake Las Vegas Resort, Freemont Street Experience and Community Bank.
Mike Lawrence, Associate Creative Director - He hasn’t been with the company since day one, but Mike Lawrence’s 17 years with The Merica Agency has yielded a portfolio that anyone would be proud to have. A ,graduate of Northern Arizona University, Mike’s responsibilities at The Merica Agency include creating original corporate logos, signage and image ad campaigns. He has worked with such clients as the Four Queens, MGM Grand, Lake Las Vegas Resort, Hallmark, Cellular One, Texas Station Gambling Hall & Hotel, Lake - Las Vegas, The Boulevard Mall, American West Development, Bootlegger Restaurant, Falcon Homes and Canyon Gate Country Club. Along the way, Mike has picked up numerous graphic design awards including approximately 35 Addy awards and the Apollo award. In his spare time, Mike is a part-time art professor at UNLV and has been teaching there for 12 years.
With his creative talent and ability to handle many ongoing projects, Mike - encompasses the skills of a true Associate Creative Director. He leads his creative team as well as compliments the work that is produced. Mike is a team player all the way. - Work Plan
Campaign Goals -
The goals of the 2000 Flood Safety Marketing and Advertising Campaign are clear: - 1. Disseminate flood safety information messages at a near 100% saturation ievei for the following target groups: residents, motorists and children. - 2. Assist in the prevention of the loss of life and property damage during flood events through public communication of flood safety’and prevention measures.
3. improve the general public’s knowledge about the dangers of flash flooding in the Clark County area and inform them on measures which can protect them, including flood insurance. . -
4. Provide the focus of flood safety communication efforts during periods of potential flood danger (Le., periods of heavy rains or anticipated flash flooding). - 5. Become familiar with the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA), Community Rating System (CRS). Make recommendations and implement programs to maximize credit to Clark County communities under CRS Activity A- 330: Outreach Projects.
6. Review the public education component of the valley:wide National Pollutant - Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit. Improve the general public’s knowledge of stormwater pollution and measures that each individual can take to improve stormwater quality.
7. Where possible, utilize existing materials to maximize the annual budget for advertising services.
Creative Rationale
Our approach in outdoor is a combination of arresting visuals (actual shots of actual Las Vegas floods) with a message that is direct and to the point. The board messages are both a direct warning and a more conventional piece of person-to-person “Hey, buddy” kind of talk that we actually listen to.
While direct warnings are clear and concise, they often challenge an adolescent instinct of rebellion. For example, if a sign clearly warns you not to drive into flooded washes, there is something in all of us that thinks that message doesn’t apply to us. These are the -- motorists who get swept away.
4 But combining that direct message with a subtle “That means you, buster and if you think you’re any different you’re a fool, pal.” gets the message across to all who are exposed.
This type of communication is intended to stop and make the motorists think. Standard warnings usually go into a dusty filing cabinet in the back of the mind. Little verbal hooks that cause you to actually think stay more top of mind.
Media Recommendations
The following are The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommendations for the most effective and efficient media mix to reach all citizens of Clark County, and also specifically addressing the need to reach the sub-targets of Children 2-l 1, newcomers and Adults SO+. These recommendations are the result of our efforts in researching several different media types and vendors.
OUTDOOR - Bill boards Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 31, 2000 Ad Unit: 14' x 48’ bulletins Planned Quantity: 8-l 1 bulletins
Outdoor billboard advertising remains the most effective medium for the flood safety messages for the following reasons:
l Provides high market reach for a very low cost-per-exposure (less than .Ol - cent per impression). l Provides 24-hour exposure.
- l Reaches most all campaign target markets with the flood safety message, specifically when they are most likely to be impacted by flooding, i.e. while they are mobile
A combination of permanent and rotary 14’ x 48' bulletins will be used. Rotary boards change locations every 60 days to provide a varied and comprehensive market reach - over the six-month campaign period. Permanent boards are ty ically used in the outlying areas, i.e. Boulder Highway and l-l 5 North to Moap a! Mesquite, totreach citizens in those areas. - The major outdoor companies in Southern Nevada have provided comprehensive outdoor programs for several years, with bonus boards and special discounted pricing due to the public service nature of the message, as well as extra exposure throughout - the year when the contracts have expired. These companies will be asked to again d provide bids and one or two will be selected based on the guaranteed ability to reach all areas of the county at the most cost-effective pricing/bonus level. 5 OUTDOOR (con timed)
The exact number and location of bulletins will be determined based on market conditions at the time of negotiation in Spring 2000.
Please note that at least one Spanish-language bulletin will be located in the 89030, 89032 or 89101 zip code area, which have the highest concentration of Hispanic citizens (according to The Source Marketing Research).
Because all 11 of the existing outdoor messages were produced in flex vinyl, and due to the durability and longevity of the material, it is recommended that we post the same vinyl again for 2000. Storage fees for the vinyl may apply after the outdoor campaign is complete, and have been included in the proposed budget.
1999 Billboard Summary: 11 total bulletins (7 permanent, 4 rotary), providing 67,182,OOO total impressions.
Bus Stop Shelter Signage -- Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 31, 2000 Ad Unit: Shelter Posters Planned Quantity: 1 S-30 posters ---
Bus stop shelter signage can provide exposure to motorists and passengers in areas of Las Vegas in which there is not 14' x 48’ billboard availability, i.e. the Northwest/Summerlin and Green Valley/Henderson area. While there are no bus stop shelter signs within Summerlin proper (due to the ban on commercial signage), there are structures on the major thoroughfares into the area, as well as near major shopping areas and medical - offices that serve the area.
The exact number of shelters and locations will be determined by market conditions at - the time of negotiation in Spring 2000. The Merica Agency/Outback Media is confident that a minimum of 15 shelters to a maximum of 30 shelters will be secured with the proposed placement budget. Please note that the production budget has been allocated to print enough posters for a maximum of 30 shelter locations.
1999 Bus Stop Shelter Summary: 30 total bus stop shelter posters (nine fixed, 21 bonus) providing 107,964,OOO impressions. -
RADIO - Radio Traffic Report Sponsorship Campaign Dates: June 5 - September 24, 2000 (16 active weeks) Ad Unit: 1 O-second live closing mentions Planned Quantity: 1,520 total spots (95 per week) 6 RADIO (continued)
Metro Traffic Control provides traffic reports on 26 local radio stations* (up from 24 last year) during Morning Drive (6-9 a.m.) and Afternoon Drive (3-6 p.m.), with limited stations airing reports in Midday (10 a.m. - 3 p.m.). Sponsorships of these reports are available and consist of a 1 O-second closing message read live by the traffic reporter.
This medium provides an excellent opportunity for CCRFCD for the following reasons:
l Reaches a large and varied audience through different radio station formats.
l Listeners are interested in avoiding traffic problems and therefore do not “tune out”.
l This medium reaches citizens when they are driving and therefore most likely to experience a flood situation.
. Production costs are minimal as the scripts are read live (no studio or talent fees).
l The three Spanish-language radio stations are included, and scripts are translated at no additional cost.
l The flood safety message can easily be conveyed in the 1 O-second time period.
l Metro reporters have been accommodating and will continue to work with CCRFCD to include approved flood safety lines in the actual reports during - flood conditions.
Data provided by CCRFCD** shows the heaviest concentration of extreme precipitation - events occur from June through September. Therefore, The Merica Agency/Outback Media proposes concentrating the traffic sponsorships in this four-month period for greater impact. A schedule of approximately 95 spots per week would air for 16 active weeks. This schedule is estimated to reach 94.6% of Adults 18+, who will hear them an average of 11.6 times*** (source: Las Vegas Arbitron Spring 1999 ratings data).
- 1999 Radio Summary: 1,575 spots total; 63 spots per week for 25 active weeks. Estimated reach 95.9% Adults 18+, who were estimated to hear the spots an average of 11.9 times. -
* For list of stations, see attached Addendum 6. ** Source: Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events in Southern Nevada (see attached Addendum A). *** Note that this reach/frequency can be estimated using only the 20 stations for which Arbitron records ratings. Three stations - KNPR, KUNV and KCEP - are non-profit public radio stations for which Arbitron -L does not report ratings. The other three do not show up in Arbitron ratings data. Therefore, the actual reach and frequency may be higher. TELEVISION
Kids Club Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 29, 2000 Ad Unit: 30-second spots Planned Quantity: 360 spots total (60 per month)
A local television station kid’s club affiliation is once again proposed. Fox 5 has been very cooperative and helpful in the past, and will again be considered for the 2000 campaign.
The Fox 5 Kids Club has 41,000 members. The special six-month CCRFCD sponsorship usually consists of the following:
. CCRFCD infomercial schedule of approximately 60 spots per month in children’s programming (Monday-Friday 3-5pm and Saturday morning); 360 spots total. -
. Production of one infomercial spot. l Ad in quarterly newsletter (two insertions total for the campaign period).
0 Sponsorship ID on Kids Club event promotional spots. l Promotional opportunities as available and created by CCRFCD and the station with other Kids Clubs sponsors, i.e. membership card display backs, FUNY phone line messages, movie premiere sponsorships, etc. Please note that the McDonald’s trayliners will not be available in 2000, as McDonald’s has decided to eliminate this due to limited availability (see Public Relations Recommendation for proposed alternative).
1999 Kids Club Summary: The Fox 5 Kids Clubs sponsorship included 360 total 30-second spots from May - October 1999. This schedule alone is estimated to have reached 69% of Kids 2-l 1, who would have seen the spot an average of 5.1 times. The children were also exposed to:
l the newsletter ad (41,000 x 2 issues = 82,000 copies x 2 average readers-per-copy = 164,000 impressions).
*other various promotional opportunities such as the Iron Giant movie sneak preview and the membership card display backs (there is no data available to calculate impressions from these campaign elements).
8 PRINT
Magazine Campaign Dates: March - December 2000 Ad Unit: Half page 4-color Planned Quantity: 4 ads total
Welcome Home Magazine Circulation: approximately 11,000 per quarter Welcome Home Magazine is mailed to all new customers establishing telephone service with Sprint Communications. The quarterly glossy 4-color magazine features information on all aspects of living in Southern Nevada, including utilities, government, schools, parks, television and radio stations, as well as feature articles on subjects of - interest to newly relocated people.
Because newcomers arrive at all times of the year and must be advised of flooding dangers, a half-page 4-color ad will be inserted in all issues, starting with the Spring 2000 (March/April/May) and including Summer 2000 (June/July/August), Fall 2000 (September/October/November) and Winter 2000 (December/January/February).
- Please note that Welcome Home Magazine provides the upgrade to 4-color at no additional cost.
-- 1999 Magazine Summary: A half-page, 4-color ad ran in two issues - Summer 1999 (June/July/August) and Fall 1999 (September/October/November); 11,000 copies x 2 issues = 22,000 copies x 2 average readers- per-copy = 44,000 impressions.
Newspaper Campaign Dates: June - August 2000 Ad Unit: 3 column x 7” BW - Planned Quantity: 3 ads total
Laughlin Nevada Times - Circulation: 9,000 weekly This weekly newspaper reaches the residents of Laughlin, who are not exposed to other campaign elements, i.e. outdoor billboards/bus stop shelters and radio traffic reports. Therefore, ads in this newspaper are recommended to disseminate flood safety information to this area.
The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommends a 3 column x 7” BW ad to run three times during the months with the heaviest flooding potential*: June, July and August. - * Source: Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events in Southern Nevada (see d attached Addendum A). - 9
4 PRINT (continued)
1999 Newspaper Summary: 3 column x 7” ad ran three times total in May, July and September; 9,000 copies x 3 issues = 27,000 copies x 2 average readers-per-copy = 54,000 impressions.
- Specialty Publications Campaign Dates: June - September 2000 Ad Unit: Approximately one-third page BW (varies by publication) - Planned Quantity: 6 ads total
The results of recent research conducted by The Source Marketing Research indicate that Adults 50+ are less aware of potential flooding in the valley than the younger population. For this reason, the local monthly senior publications targeted to the senior population are recommended.
For immediate impact, The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommend running an ad in all three publications in June, then alternating publications over the following three months.
Nevada Senior World Circulation: 75,000 per month A 3/8 page BW ad (7-3/8” x 6-l/8”) will run in June and August.
Senior Press Circulation: 45,000 per month A l/3 page BW ad (5” x 9”) will run in June and July.
Senior Spectrum (Southern Nevada edition) Circulation: 40,000 per month A l/3 page BW ad (6” x 8”) will run in June and September.
1999 Specialty Pub. Summary: No senior publications were utilized. This is a new recommendation based on recent research results from The Source Marketing Research.
-
10 Additional Campaign Elements
Promotional/Event Collateral Stickers Campaign Dates: May - October 2000 Description/Unit: 4-color stickers. Four to a sheet (three stickers with the Flood Control message and one with the NPDES message). Planned Quantity: 10,000 of four different designs for a total of 40,000.
A promotional tool used to target and educate children on the dangers of flooding, the stickers are printed on a vinyl paper that allow them to be easily removed from surfaces and reused. They will be distributed to children in elementary schools and at promotional events attended by a representative of the Regional Flood Control District.
1999 Collateral Sticker Summary: The stickers were distributed to children Qges 2-l 1 through promotional events and visits to area elementary schools.
Update of CCRFCD Brochure Campaign Dates: Sept. - Nov. Description/Unit: Update and revise 1999 CCRFCD brochure for 2000. Save to disk and submit to client for printing. Planned Quantity: One version of the updated brochure on disk.
1999 CCRFCD Brochure - Summary: The Merica Agency updated and revised the 1998 brochure for 1999 and submitted to client on disk for printing and distribution. - Milk Cartons Campaign Dates: TBD (depending on availability). 10 - 14 day periods. - Description/Unit: 3 messages (flash floods, NPDES and flood insurance). Planned Quantity: Message will be displayed on one panel of l/2 gallon milk cartons and will be distributed through area convenience - stores and Anderson Dairy. An exact number of milk cartons cannot be given.
1999 Milk Carton Summary: Three messages were distributed through area convenience stores and Anderson Dairy in 1999 during the months of June, July and August. An exact number of milk cartons cannot be provided by Anderson Dairy representatives.
11 Public Relations Recommendations
Due to the discontinuation of the Clark County Regional Flood Control District/McDonald’s Flood Awareness Trayliner promotion, Faiss Foley Merica Public Relations, the public relations and government affairs arm of The Merica Agency, has devised a new, multi-phase public relations campaign for 2000 that we feel will garner as _ much, if not more positive press than the trayliner program. While it would be best to implement the entire program, the program has been designed so that the phases could be implemented individually. -
1) Annual Flood Awareness Poster Contest - To replace the McDonald’s Trayliner program, Faiss Foley Merica has come up with an idea that would reach the same - audience, yet would have more media mileage. We are suggesting that the Clark County Regional Flood Control District sponsor an annual poster contest that would be promoted throughout the Valley’s elementary schools. We would have - elementary children submit flood awareness drawings to the District throughout the flood season. At the end of the flood season, we would choose one drawing that would be made into a poster and unveiled at the beginning of the next year’s - flood season. A press conference with the winning entry and its artist would be held, just like the unveiling of the trayliner. The posters would then be distributed to the local schools and the media. We feel that this could be a great annual program that the District would have complete ownership. We also - feel this program would reach more children than the trayliner and we could still promote the entries and winners through our affiliation with the Fox 5 Kid’s Club.
2) Media Bus Tour - Faiss Foley Merica is suggesting that CCRFCD host a media bus tour that would tour media members around the valley pointing out projects that have already been completed and projects that are in the works as part of the District’s lo-year plan. The half-day event would begin with the media bus tour and conclude with lunch and a question and answer session. We feel the District would find the media tour to be a valuable tool in educating the media first-hand. Faiss Foley Merica would coordinate with the District in all aspects of planning, coordinating and executing this program. A member of the District would serve as the tour guide during the event and would answer media questions during the question and answer session.
3) DMV Partnership - Faiss Foley Merica would like to coordinate with the Department of Motor Vehicles to accomplish one of more of the following:
A. A question concerning flood awareness included of the Nevada State Driver’s License Exam. B. A pamphlet on flood awareness inserted into the Nevada State Driver’s Hand book.
12 C. Flood awareness information posted on the Department of Motor Vehicle’s website and a hot link established from the DMV website to CCRFCD’s website.
Faiss Foley Merica would be instrumental in coordinating with the proper agencies to get this accomplished.
4) Clark County Flash Flood Awareness Month - Faiss Foley Merica has discovered that there is no locally recognized Flash Flood Awareness Month, Week or even Day. We are suggesting that we assist CCRFCD in getting the month of June locally recognized as Clark County Flash Flood Awareness Month. During the month, we would send out press releases about flood awareness and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District. Faiss Foley Merica would work with the proper local and state agencies to get this accomplished.
--
-
-
13 Proposed Plan Price Estimate
Proposed Work Plan Task/Description Price Estimate
I. Outdoor Billboards
Storage Costs for the outdoor billboard $ 3,000 vinyl flexes during the months Nov.-April.
Placement (permanent and rotary) of 8-l 1 $ 68,000 billboards for the proposed six month period from May through October.
II. Busstop Shelter Signage
Design, art direction, photography rights, $ 4,500 production and account management of approximately 15 - 30 full-color electrostatic laminated busstop shelter posters.
Placement and posting of approximately 1 S-30 $ 13,000 busstop shelter posters in areas not serviced by outdoor billboards for the proposed six month period from May through October.
Ill. Radio Traffic Report Sponsorships
Placement of approximately 95 spots per week, $ 54,000 1 O-second closing messages for the Metro Traffic Control traffic reports during morning drive (6-9 a.m.1 and afternoon drive (3-6 p.m.), every week for the period from June 5 through September 24. The approved scripts that aired in 1999 will again be used for 2000.
Due to the high growth of the Las Vegas valley and Clark County, there is a substantial increase in demand for the Metro Radio Traffic Reports. An increase in cost is reflected in the placement figure.
14 IV. Television/Kids Club
Production and account management of updated/ $ 4,200 revised newsletter print ad and other promotional opportunities (movie releases, television sponsorship promotional spots, etc.) Account management of one 30-second infomercial/PSA spot.
Placement of one 30-second infomercial spot $ 35,000 to run in children’s programming (Monday-Friday 3-5 p.m.) for six-month period from May through October. Includes sponsorship ID on Kids Club event promotional spots, placement of ad in quarterly newsletter, and other promotional opportunities.
V. Print
Welcome Home Magazine
Production and account management $ 1,500 of one half-page full color ad.
Placement of one, half-page, full-color ad in $ 2,100 all four issues (Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter) of Welcome Home Magazine for 2000.
- Laughlin Nevada Times
Art direction, production and account management $ 1,000 - of a black-and-white, 21 column inch ad.
Placement of one black-and-white 21 column inch ad $ 1,800 - for the months of June, July and August.
Specialty Publications
Art direction, production and account management $ 2,000 of black-and-white, l/3 page ad. - Placement of six total black-and-white, l/3 page ads $ 5,200 for the months of June - September.
15 VI. Promotional/Event Collateral Stickers
Reprint of four different designs, four-color $ 4,500 at a quantity of 10,000 each for a total of 40,000 stickers (three stickers with Flood Control message and one with NPDES message). -
VII. Update/New CCRFCD Brochure - Design, production and account management. $ 3,000
VIII. Milk Cartons -
Use two existing messages (one message for $ 600 Flood Control and one message for NPDES) - and produce one new message (flood insurance).
Placement of 2-3 messages for available $0 periods of 1 O-l 4 days each. Exact season to be confirmed (Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer). Also, overrun placement when available.
IX. Public Relations Campaign
Plan 1 - Annual Poster Contest $ 3,000
Production and printing of coloring $ 1,200 sheets and framing of the selected winners piece.
Plan 2 - Media Bus Tour $ 6,000 Plan 3 - DMV Partnership $ 2,000 Plan 4 - Flash Flood Awareness. Month $ 3,000
X. Contingency
Attendance and presentation to the Citizens $ 6,400 Advisory Committee and the CCRFCD Board of Directors. -
Total Estimated Annual Cost: 1 $ 225,000
16 2000 Budget Summary
Item cost % of Budget
Outdoor (billboards, bus stop shelters) $ 88,500 39%
Radio $ 54,000 24%
Television/Kids Club $ 39,200 1 7%
Print $ 13,600 6%
Misc. (stickers, brochure update, milk cartons) $ 8,100 4%
Public Relations $ 15,200 7%
--v Contingency (meetiws, oresentations, etc.) $ 6,400 .3%
- Total ’ $ 225,000 100%
-
-
17 1999 vs. 2000 Advertising Budget Comparison
1999 2000 Camoaiw Item Max. Budget Max. Budget
Outdoor Bi I I boards $ 74,000 $ 71,000
Bus Stop Shelter Signage $ 21,000 $ 17,500
Radio Traffic Reports $ 45,500 $ 54,000
Television/Kids Club $ 37,000 $ 39,200
Print Welcome Home Magazine $4,500 $ 3,600 Laughlin Nev. Times Specialty Pubs. 3it400 J 27’%I Total Print $ 8,900 $ 13,600
Promotion+1 Stickers $ 4,200 $ 4,500
Brochure Update $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Anderson Dairy Mi I k Cartons $ 500 $ 600
Weather Channel Messages $0 NA/TBD
Public Relations Campaign $0 $ 15,200
Contingency $ 5,900 $ 6,400
Total Budget $ 200,000 $ 225,000
18 Agency’s Hourly Rate(s) of Billable Services Schedule
Hourly Rates
Partners Billable Rate $150
Rates other than Partners:
Creative Development $80 to $150 Art Direction Design Production/Layout Project Supervision
Design $80 to $150 -- Production $80 to $150
Copywriting $100 to $120
Public Relations/Major Events $80 to $120 - Account Services $40 to $120
- Production Cost
- Outside Services - 20% of the Gross****
Photography - 25% of the Gross**** -
Media
(Billed at Agency’s reduced bulk rate) - 15% of the Gross*****
**** Standard agency mark-up of the net vendor cost, without tax. *****Allowing for 15% of the gross amount for media commission.
b 19 Addendum A
c NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL ARL-221 I . I I
I ANALYSIS OF EXTREME PRECIPITATION EVENTS IN SOUTHERN NEVADA
D. Randerson
1
Air Resources Laboratory I Silver Spring, Maryland April 1997
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND Environmental Research noaa ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION I Laboratories
20 10
5
0 , 3 3 7 0 1, 13 15 17 10 21 23 25 27 22 1 3 5 7 0 11 19 15 17 10 21 23 25 27 22 31 2 4 0 8 10 12 14 10 II 20 22 24 20 211 30 , 3 5 7 23 25 27 29 June July WI Sept Date
Figure 5d. Five-day running total of thunderstorm days for Las Vegas, Nevada, for June through September, 1952-1995. Addendum B
Metro Networks Traffic Report Affiliate Stations
Commercial Stations N&Commercial Public Stations KDOX-AM KCEP-FM KDWN-AM KNPR-FM KENO-AM KU NV-FM KFMS- FM - KISF-FM KJUL-FM -- KKLZ-FM KLSQ-AM - KLUC-FM KMXB-FM KMZQ-FM -- KNUU-AM KOMP-FM - KQOL-FM KSN E-FM KSTJ-FM KVBC-FM KWNR-FM KXNT-AM KXPT-FM - KKVV-AM KLAV-AM KRLV-AM
Sponsorships rotate across the stations in the network in proportion to the number of reports carried by each station, and air on all stations in the network. -
22 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into as of the 9th day of December, 1999, by and between the Clark County Regional Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as “DISTRICT”; and The Merica Agency, a business legally authorized to do business in the State of Nevada and Clark County, hereinafter referred to as “CONSULTANT.”
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the DISTRICT desires to protect citizens of Clark County and prevent loss of life and property during flood events in Clark County; and WHEREAS, Nevada Revised Statutes Section 543.510, Paragraph 2, authorizes the DISTRICT’s chief engineer and general manager to hire and retain agents and other persons necessary or desirable to effect the purposes of the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, a flood safety program is an important tool to protect lives and property from flooding;
/vow, THEREFORE, the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT agree to the following:
SECTION I - RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, clerical accuracy, timely completion, and coordination of all services furnished by CONSULTANT, its subcontractors, sub-consultants, agents, and employees under this CONTRACT. In performing the specified services, CONSULTANT shall follow practices consistent with generally accepted professional and ethical standards.
All work products are to be completed in conformance with all pertinent and current federal, state, and local statutes, codes, ordinances, resolutions, and any other applicable regulation at the time the work is performed.
Any and all documents, art work, rights to art work, and other products prepared and/or submitted by CONSULTANT to the DISTRICT, and all information required of CONSULTANT by the CONTRACT, become the property of the DISTRICT. CONSULTANT may retain copies and reproducible copies of all documents produced as a result of the work. In the event of the termination of the CONTRACT, all documents produced shall be and become the property of the - DISTRtCT. CONSULTANT agrees to surrender all such documents to the DISTRICT in a timely manner at the request of the DISTRICT.
D. CONSULTANT agrees that its officers and employees will cooperate with the DISTRICT in the performance of services under this CONTRACT and shall schedule meetings with DISTRICT ‘d employees at such reasonable times and with advance notice as to not conflict with other responsibilities.
Page 1 of 6 E. CONSULTANT agrees that it shall not enter collateral, artwork, or other products developed under - this contract in any contest, award program, or the like without the written authorization of the DISTRICT. -~ - F. CONSULTANT agrees to obtain DISTRICT approval on all advertising materials prior to release. All materials are to be carefully inspected by the CONSULTANT for accuracy prior to presentation to DISTRICT for approval. DISTRICT review of material may be conceptual in nature and does not _ release the CONSULTANT from responsibility for accuracy of spelling, grammar, design, print checks, and other tasks which would reasonably be expected of a firm providing such advertising services. - G. DISTRICT currently has a logo which needs to be utilized. No modifications to the logo will be allowed or accepted.
H. CONSULTANT shall perform the services as identified in Section III - SCOPE OF SERVICES (Exhibit 1) and SCHEDULE OF TASK COMPLETION (Exhibit 2).
SECTION II - DISTRICT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Officers and employees of the DISTRICT shall cooperate with CONSULTANT in the performance of services under this CONTRACT and will be available for consultation with CONSULTANT at such reasonable times with advance notice as to not conflict with other responsibilities. --
B. The services performed by CONSULTANT under this CONTRACT shall be subject to review and approval by the DISTRICT General Manager. The DISTRICT General Manager may delegate any -- or all of the General Manager’s responsibilities under this CONTRACT to appropriate staff members, and shall so inform CONSULTANT before the effective date of such delegation. It is understood that the DISTRICT’s review does not relieve CONSULTANT from the responsibility for the professional and clerical accuracy of all work delivered under this CONTRACT.
C. All information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing, available, and in the DISTRICT’s custody, and which are necessary to carry out the work shall be furnished to the CONSULTANT. The DISTRICT shall cooperate with CONSULTANT in every reasonable way during all phases of the Scope of Services in this CONTRACT.
SECTION Ill - SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONSULTANT will develop and implement an advertising campaign program in order to promote flood safety to the residents of Clark County. The advertising services to be provided by CONSULTANT shall consist of the work described in Exhibit 1, “SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES” and shall be performed in compliance with the schedule shown on Exhibit 2, “SCHEDULE OF TASK COMPLETION.”
- SECTION IV - COMPENSATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT
A. The DISTRICT agrees to pay CONSULTANT for services performed under the Exhibit 1, “SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES” tasks and on a “Time and Materials” basis in accordance with Exhibit 3 “SCHEDULE OF AGENCY SERVICES.” The maximum cost to the DISTRICT for all services -. under this CONTRACT shall not exceed $225,000.00, unless the DISTRICT receives a written request with justification and the DISTRICT approves in writing in advance of the services being
- Page 2 of 6 provided for a change in scope and an increase in compensation. If a change is approved, a supplement to this CONTRACT will be executed by both parties.
B. The DISTRICT has allowed a maximum budget for each task contained in the Scope of Services, as outlined below. The maximum budget amount for each task shall include any and all services associated with each particular task. CONSULTANT agrees not to exceed the budget amount for each task unless the DISTRICT General Manager receives a written request with justification and the DISTRICT General Manager approves in writing in advance of the services being provided for a change in scope and an increase in compensation. The total cost of all tasks in the CONTRACT shall not exceed $225,000, except as provided in Section IV-A of this CONTRACT.
TASK MAXIMUM BUDGET
1. Outdoor Advertising - Billboards $ 71,000
2. Busstop Shelter Signage 17,500
3. Radio Traffic Reports 54,000
4. Children’s Television 39,200
5. Print Media 13,600
6. MISC (stickers, brochure update, milk carton) 8,100
7. Public Relations Campaign 15,200
8. Contingency 6,400 MAXIMUM BUDGET TOTAL (not to exceed) $225,000 - C. CONSULTANT is to submit invoices to DISTRICT for the work performed under the above listed tasks. The DISTRICT agrees to pay CONSULTANT the amount of the invoice within thirty days following receipt of the invoice. In the event that the DISTRICT questions a portion of an invoice, payment will be made on that part not in question.
SECTION V - TERMINATION
- This CONTRACT may be terminated by the DISTRICT upon thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice to CONSULTANT. If said termination occurs prior to the completion of the services to be provided under this CONTRACT, CONSULTANT shall deliver to the DISTRICT all documents, computer diskettes, and all other work performed, whether complete or incomplete in a timely manner at the request of the DISTRICT. Thereafter, the DISTRICT will reimburse CONSULTANT for all services performed prior to such notice, provided the services are satisfactory to the DISTRICT. Termination shall be by written notice, which may be sent by registered mail or hand delivered to the address contained in this contract. Such notice will be - deemed effective after the third business day of the mailing date, or if hand delivered such notice will be deemed effective upon receipt of the written termination to CONSULTANT. SECTION VI - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
1 d A. In order to perform its duties as defined herein, CONSULTANT may, at its own expense, engage the services of outside agents. The DISTRICT will not be a party to any contract with outside agent
Page 3 of 6 and the total cost of this CONTRACT shall not be increased due to the utilization of an outside agent. Prior to engaging any outside agents, CONSULTANT shall request appropriate written authorization from the DISTRICT’s General Manager. n
B. Neither party may assign its rights and obligations pursuant to this CONTRACT without the written consent of the other party. The consent of a party to any assignment shall apply only to the incidents expressed and provided for in the written consent, and shall not be deemed a consent to any subsequent assignment. Subject to the foregoing, this CONTRACT inures to the benefit of, and is binding upon, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
C. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor. Nothing herein shall be construed to imply a joint venture or principal and agent relationship between the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT, and neither party shall have any right, power, or authority to create any obligation, express or implied, on behalf of the other. -
D. This CONTRACT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.
E. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain, for the duration of this CONTRACT, general liability insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in - connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors of any tier. The cost of such insurance shall be at the CONSULTANT’s own expense. -
The CONSULTANT will provide the DISTRICT with certificates of insurance for coverage as listed below and endorsements, establishing coverage required by the CONTRACT within ten (10) /-.- calendar days after approval of this CONTRACT by the DISTRICT’s Board. The certificate of endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer and licensed by the State of Nevada.
1. Each insurance company’s rating as shown in the latest Best’s Key Rating Guide shall be fully disclosed and entered on the required certificate of insurance. The adequacy of the insurance supplied by the CONSULTANT, including the rating and financial health of each insurance company providing coverage, is subject to the approval of the DISTRICT.
2. The DISTRICT, its officers and employees must be expressly covered as insureds except on workers’ compensation insurance coverage.
3. The CONSULTANT’s insurance shall be primary with respect to the DISTRICT, its officers, and employees. Any other coverage available to the DISTRICT, its officers, and employees shall be excess over the insurance required of the CONSULTANT.
4. The CONSULTANT’s general liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to recognize specifically CONSULTANT’s contractual liability to the DISTRICT. It is further agreed that the CONSULTANT or its Insurance Carrier shall provide the DISTRICT with 30-day advance written notice of any cancellation of the policies.
5. All deductibles and self-insured retentions shall be fully disclosed in the Certificates of Insurance. No deductible or self-insured retention may exceed $10,000, without the written approval of the DISTRICT.
6. If aggregate limits are imposed on bodily injury and property damage, then the amount of - such limits must not be less than $2,000,000. All aggregates must be fully disclosed and the amount entered on the required certificate of insurance. CONSULTANT must notify the - Pase 4 of 6 DISTRICT of any erosion of the aggregate limits.
7. General liability coverage shall be on a “per occurrence” basis only and not “claims made”. The coverage must be provided either on a Commercial General Liability form or a Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability form. No exceptions to coverages provided in such forms are permitted. Policies must include, but need not be limited to, coverages for bodily injury, personal injury, Broad Form property damage, premises operations, severability of interest, products and completed operations, and contractual and independent contractors. General liability insurance policies shall be endorsed to include DISTRICT as additional insureds. Subject to Paragraph 6 of this subsection, CONSULTANT shall maintain limits of no less than $1 ,OOO,OOO;combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury (including death), personal injury, and property damages.
a. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain, for the duration of this CONTRACT, automobile coverage which must include, but need not be limited to, coverage against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the use of any auto in the performance of the work hereunder by the CONSULTANT, its agents, representatives, employees, or sub-consultants of any tier. Subject to Paragraph 6 of this subsection, CONSULTANT shall maintain limits of no less than $1 ,OOO,OOO,combined single limit “per occurrence” for bodily injury and property damage.
9. If the CONSULTANT fails to maintain any of the insurance coverages required herein, then the DISTRICT will have the option to declare the CONSULTANT in breach, or may purchase replacement insurance or pay the premiums that are due on existing policies in order that the required coverages may be maintained. The CONSULTANT is responsible for any payments made by the DISTRICT to obtain or maintain such insurance and the DISTRICT may collect the same from the CONSULTANT or deduct the amount paid from any sums due the CONSULTANT under this CONTRACT.
10. The insurance requirements specified herein do not relieve the CONSULTANT of its responsibility or limit the amount of its liability to the DISTRICT or other persons and the - CONSULTANT is encouraged to purchase such additional insurance as it deems necessary.
11. CONSULTANT is responsible for and required to remedy all damage or loss to any property, including property of DISTRICT, caused in whole or in part by the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT’s sub-consultant, or - anyone employed, directed, or supervised by CONSULTANT.
F. Regardless of the coverage provided by any insurance, CONSULTANT shall pay all costs necessary to - defend and shall indemnify and hold harmless the DISTRICT from any and all claims, demands, actions, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses based upon or arising out of any negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT or its associates, employees, subcontractors, and other agents while performing services under this CONTRACT.
G. This document shall not create any right in or benefit to parties other than the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT. - H. The failure of either party to enforce, at any time or for any period of time, the provisions hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of such provisions or of the rights of such party to enforce each and every - provision. <-.A I. Except as where specifically stated otherwise in this CONTRACT, all notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or permitted pursuant to this CONTRACT shall be made in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if personally delivered or deposited in the United States mail,
Page 5 of 6 first class postage, prepared and addressed as follows:
To DISTRICT: Gale Wm. Fraser, II, P.E., General Manager /I Clark County Regional Flood Control District 600 South Grand Central Parkway, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106-4511
To CONSULTANT: Joe Merica, President The Merica Agency 521 S. Seventh Street Las Vegas, NV 89101
or to such other address as either party may specify by written notice given as provided herein to the other party.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto have caused this CONTRACT to be executed as of the date and year first hereinabove-written, and shall remain in effect for a one-year period from February 3, 2000 to February 2,200l unless terminated as provided herein or extended by subsequent Board action. -
Date of District Action: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT -
BY: -.- Al-TEST: LAWRENCE L. BROWN III, CHAIRMAN
CAROLYN FRAZIER, Board Secretary
Approved as to Form:
BY: CHRISTOPHER FIGGINS Deputy District Attorney THE MERICA AGENCY -
BY: JOE MERICA, President
DATE:
I:!MERtCAOO\FSAcontrctOO.wpd
GW F:CF:JMO
Page 6 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 L SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES
- 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES i, 1. This advertising services contract will cover creative work, copywriting, design, production, printing, media placement, and related services for the dissemination of flood safety messages to the public. RFCD currently performs its own public relations work in-house. Thus, basic public relations tasks should not be included except when representing RFCD in the placement of media advertisements.
2. The tentative annual budget for all services shall be $225,000. All costs associated with this contract, including retainer fees, media buys, distribution, mailings, - overhead costs, and any other costs must come in at or under the tentative budget amount.
- 3. The goals of the marketing and advertising campaign are as follows:
a. Disseminate flood safety information messages at a near 100% saturation level for the following target groups: homeowners, motorists, new residents, and children. It should be noted that the program should include all areas of Clark - County, including the outlying areas. It is also important to include individuals in the above listed target groups that have Spanish as a primary language. -d b. Assist in the prevention of the loss of life and property during flood events through public communication of flood safety and prevention measures. 1 C. Improve the general public’s knowledge about the dangers of flash flooding in the Clark County area and measures which can protect them.
d. Provide the focus of flood safety communication efforts during periods of potential flood danger (i.e., periods of heavy rains or anticipated flash flooding).
e. Become familiar with the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA), Community Rating System (CRS). Make recommendations and implement programs to maximize credit to Clark County communities under CRS Activity 330: Outreach Projects.
Pagelof15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES f-t
f. Review the public education component of the valley wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit. Improve the general public’s knowledge of stormwater pollution and measures that each individual can take to improve stormwater quality.
g. Where possible, utilize existing materials to maximize the annual budget for advertising services.
4. In order to reach the target audience, the program should utilize the most effective mix of media which may include, but not be limited to, the following: -
n Outdoor advertising n Television - n Radio n Newspaper m Direct mail - n Other
5. Provide a monthly written status report in accordance with a schedule set by RFCD -- staff and on the form provided by RFCD staff. - 6. Provide quarterly status reports to the Citizens Advisory Committee and to the Board of Directors.
7. RFCD currently has a logo which needs to be utilized. No modifications to the logo will be allowed or accepted. a. All advertising materials must be approved by RFCD prior to release. All materials are to be carefully inspected by the contractor for accuracy prior to presentation to RFCD for approval. RFCD review of materials may be conceptual in nature and does not release the contractor from responsibility for accuracy of spelling, -. grammar, design, print checks, and other tasks that would reasonably be expected of a firm providing such advertising services. - 9. All original art work and other products will become the property of RFCD. All rights to art work and other products produced in association with this program are to remain as the property of RFCD. The consultant must request RFCD’s permission
to submit program collateral in any award competition. f---.
Page2of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
Work Plan
Campaign Goals
The goals of the 2000 Flood Safety Marketing and Advertising Campaign are clear: - I. Disseminate flood safety information messages at a near 100% saturation Level for the following target groups: residents, motorists and children.
2. Assist in the prevention of the loss of life and property damage during flood events through public communication of flood safety’and prevention measures. - 3. Improve the general public’s knowledge about the dangers of flash flooding in the Clark County area and inform them on measures which can protect them, including flood insurance. . 4. Provide the focus of flood safety communication efforts during periods of potential flood danger (i.e., periods of heavy rains or anticipated flash flooding):
5. Become familiar with the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA), Community Rating System (CRS). Make recommendations and implement programs to maximize credit to Clark County communities under CRS Activity 330: Outreach Projects.
6. Review the public education component of the valley:.wide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit. Improve the general public’s knowledge of stormwater pollution and measures that each individual can take to improve stormwater quality.
7. Where possible, utilize existing materials to maximize the annual budget for advertising services.
Creative Rationale
Our approach in outdoor is .a combination ~of arresting visuals (actual shots of actual Las Vegas floods) with a message that is direct and to the point. The board messages are both a direct warning and a more conventional piece of person-to-person “Hey, buddy” kind of talk that we actually listen to. - While direct warnings are clear and concise, they often challenge an adolescent instinct of rebellion. For example, if a sign clearly warns you not to drive into flooded washes, there is something in all of us that thinks that message doesn’t apply to us. These are the motorists who get swept away.
Page3of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES
2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES n
But combining that direct message with a subtle “That means you, buster and if you -’ - think you’re any different you’re a fool, pal.” gets the message across to all who are exposed.
This type of communication is intended to stop and make the motorists think. Standard warnings usually go into a dusty filing cabinet in the back of the mind. Little verbal hooks that cause you to actually think stay more top of mind.
Media Recommendations
The following are The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommendations for the most effective and efficient media mix to reach all citizens of Clark County, and also specifically addressing the need to reach the sub-targets of Children 2-11, newcomers and Adults SO+. These recommendations are the result of our efforts in researching several different media types and vendors.
OUTDOOR
Bill boards -- Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 31, 2000 Ad Unit: 14’ x 48’ bulletins . Planned Quantity: 8-l 1 bulletins
Outdoor billboard advertising remains the most effective medium for the flood safety messages for the following reasons: l Provides high market reach for a very low cost-per-exposure (less than .Ol cent per impression). -_ l Provides 24-hour exposure. 0 Reaches most all campaign target markets with the flood safety message, specifically when they are most likely to be impacted by flooding, i.e. while they are mobile
A combination of permanent and rotary 14’ x 48’ bulletins will be used. Rotary boards _ change locations every 60 days to provide a varied and comprehensive market reach over the six-month campaign period. Permanent boards are ty ically used in the outlying areas, i.e. Boulder Highway and l-l 5 North to Moap a7Mesquite, to reach - citizens in those areas.
The major outdoor companies in Southern Nevada have provided comprehensive - outdoor programs for several years, with bonus boards and special discounted pricing due to the public service nature of the message, as well as extra exposure throughout - t the year when the contracts have expired. These companies will be asked to again provide bids and one or two will be selected based on the guaranteed ability to reach all , - areas of the county at the most cost-effective pricing/bonus level. - Page4of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES - 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
OUTDOOR (con timed)
The exact number and location of bulletins will be determined based on market conditions at the time of negotiation in Spring 2000.
Please note that at least one Spanish-language bulletin will be located in the 89030, 89032 or 89101 zip code area, which have the highest concentration of Hispanic - citizens (according to The Source Marketing Research).
Because all 11 of the existing outdoor messages were produced in flex vinyl, and due to the durability and longevity of the material, it is recommended that we post the same vinyl again for 2000. Storage fees for the vinyl may apply after the outdoor campaign is complete, and have been included in the proposed budget.
1999 Billboard Summary: 11 total bulletins (7 permanent, 4 rotary), providing 67,182,OOO total impressions.
Bus Stop Shelter Signage Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 3 1,200O Ad Unit: Shelter Posters Planned Quantity: 1 S-30 posters :
Bus stop shelter signage can provide exposure to motorists and passengers in areas of Las Vegas in which there is not 14' x 48’ billboard availability, i.e. the NorthweNSummerlin - and Green Valley/Henderson area. While there are no bus stop shelter signs within r ., Summerlin proper (due to the ban on commercial signage), there are structures on the major thoroughfares into the area, as well as near major shopping areas and medical offices that serve the area. - The exact number of shelters and locations will be determined by market conditions at the time of negotiation in Spring 2000. The Merica Agency/Outback Media is confident - that a minimum of 15 shelters to a maximum of 30 shelters will be secured with the proposed placement budget. Please note that the production budget has been allocated to print enough posters for a maximum of 30 shelter locations. - 1999 Bus Stop Shelter Summary: 30 total bus stopsshelter posters (nine fixed, 21 bonus) providing 107,964,OOO impressions.
RADIO
Radio Traffic Report Sponsorship Campaign Dates: June 5 - Se tember 24, 2000 (16 active weeks) Ad Unit: 1 O-second Pive closing mentions Planned Quantity: 1,520 total spots (95 per week)
Page5of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
RA D/O (continued
Metro Traffic Control provides traffic reports on 26 local radio stations* (u from 24 last year) during Morning Drive (6-9 a.m.) and Afternoon Drive (3-6 p.m.), wit Rlimited stations airing reports in Midday (10 a.m. - 3 p.m.). Sponsorships of these reports are available and consist of a 1 O-second closing message read live by the traffic reporter.
This medium piovides an excellent opportunity for CCRFCD for the following reasons:
l Reaches a large and varied audience through different radio station formats.
l Listeners are interested in avoiding traffic problems and therefore do not “tune out”.
0 This medium reaches citizens when they are driving and therefore mbst likely to experience a flood situation.
l Production costs are minimal as the scripts are read live (no studio or talent fees). _
0 The three Spanish-language radio stations are included, and scripts are translated at no additional cost. --- 0 The flood safety message can easily be conveyed in the 1 O-second time period. - l Metro reporters have been accommodatin and will continue to work with CCRFCD to include approved flood safety f ines in the actual reports during flood conditions. - Data provided by CCRFCD** shows the heaviest concentration of extreme precipitation events occur from June through September. Therefore, The Merica Agency/Outback Media proposes-concentrating the traffic sponsorships in this four-.month period for - greater impact. A schedule of approximately 95 spots.per week would air for 16 active weeks. This schedule is estimated to reach 94.6% of Adults 18+, who will hear them an average of 11.6 times ***(source: Las Vegas Arbitron’ Spring 1999 ratings data). -
1999 Radio Summary: 1,575 spots total; 63 spots per week for 25 active weeks. Estimated reach 95.9% Adults 18+, who were estimated to -- hear the spots an average of 11.9 times.
* For list of stations, see attached Addendum B. ** Source: Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events in Southern Nevada (see attached Addendum A). *** Note that this reach/frequency can be estimated using only the 20 stations for which Arbitron records ratings. Three stations - KNPR, KUNV and KCEP - are non-profit public radio stations for which Arbitron - does not report ratings. The other three do not show up in Arbitron ratings data. Therefore, the actual /- reach and frequency may be higher. -
- Page6of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES
- 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
TELEVISION
Kids Club Campaign Dates: May 1 - October 29, 2000 Ad Unit: 30-second spots Planned Quantity: 360 spots total (60 per month)
A local television station kid’s club affiliation is once again proposed. Fox 5 has been very cooperative and helpful in the past, and will again be considered for the 2000 campaign.
The Fox 5 Kids Club has 41,,000 members. The special six-month CCRFCD sponsorship - usually consists of the following:
0 CCRFCD infomercial schedule of approximately 60 spots per month in - children’s programming (Monday-Friday 3-5pm and Saturday morning); 360 spots total.
l Production of one infomercial spot. - a Ad in quarterly newsletter (two insertions total for the campaign period).
0 Sponsorship ID on Kids Club event promotional spots.
l Promotional opportunities as available and created by CCRFCD and the station with other Kids Clubs sponsors, i.e. membership card display backs, FUNY phone line messages, movie premiere sponsorships, etc. Please note that the McDonald’s trayliners will not be available in 2000, as McDonald’s has decided to eliminate this due to limited availability (see Public Relations Recommendation for proposed alternative).
- 1999 Kids Club Summary: The Fox 5 Kids Clubs sponsorship included 360 total 30-second spots from May - October 1999. This schedule alone is estimated to have reached 69% of Kids 2-l 1, who - would have seen the spot an average of 5.1 times. The children were also exposed to:
l the newsletter ad (41,000 x 2 issues = 82,000 copies x 2 average readers-per-copy = 164,000 impressions).
*other various promotional opportunities such as the Iron Giant movie sneak preview and the membership card display backs (there is no data available to calculate impressions from these campaign elements).
Page7of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
Magazine Campaign Dates: March - December 2000 Ad Unit: Half page 4-color Planned Quantity: 4 ads total
Welcome Home Magazine Circulation: approximately 11,000 per quarter Welcome Home Magazine is mailed to all new customers establishing telephone service with Sprint Communications. The quarterly glossy 4-color magazine features information on all aspects of living in Southern Nevada, including utilities, government, schools, parks, television and radio stations, as well as feature articles on subjects of interest to newly relocated people.
Because newcomers arrive at all times of the year and must be advised of flooding dangers, a half-page 4-color ad will be inserted in all issues, starting with the Spring 2000 (March/April/May) and including Summer 2000 (June/July/August), Fall 2000 (September/October/November) and Winter 2000 (December/January/February).
Please note that Welcome Home Magazine provides the upgrade to 4-color at no additional cost.
1999 Magazine Summary: A half-page, 4-color ad ran in two issues - Summer 1999 (June/July/August) and Fall 1999 Beptember/October/November); 11,000 copies x 2 issues = 22,000 copies x 2 average readers- per-copy = 44,000 impressions.
Newspaper - Campaign Dates: June - August 2000 Ad ‘Unit: 3 column x 7” BW Planned Quantity: 3 ads total
Laughlin Nevada Times Circulation: 9,000 weekly - This weekly newspaper reaches the residents of Laughlin, who are not exposed to other campaign elements, i.e. outdoor billboards/bus stop shelters and radio traffic reports. Therefore, ads in this newspaper are recommended to disseminate flood safety - information to this area.
The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommends a 3 column x 7” BW ad to run three times during the months with the heaviest flooding potential*: June, July and August. - - * Source: Analysis of Extreme Precipitation Events in Southern Nevada (see .J- : attached Addendum A).
Page8of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
PRlNT (continued)
1999 Newspaper - Summary: 3 column x 7” ad ran three times total in May, July and September; 9,000 copies x 3 issues = 27,000 copies x 2 average readers-per-copy = 54,000 impressions.
Specialty Publications Campaign Dates: June - September 2000 Ad Unit: Approximately one-third page BW (varies by publication) Planned Quantity: 6 ads total
The results of recent research conducted b The Source Marketing Research indicate - that Adults SO+ are less aware of potential Ylooding in the valley than the younger population. For this reason, the local monthly senior publications targeted to the senior population are recommended. - For immediate impact, The Merica Agency/Outback Media recommend running an ad in all three publications in June, then alternating publications over the following three months.
Nevada Senior World -- Circulation: 75;OOO per month : A 3/8 page BW ad (7-3/8” x 6-l/8”) will run in June and August.
- Senior Press Circulation: 45,000 per month A l/3 page BW ad (5” x 9”) will run in June and July. - Senior Spectrum (Southern Nevada edition) Circulation: 40,000 per month - A l/3 page BW ad (6” x 8”) will run in June and September. 1999 Specialty Pub. Summary: No senior publications were utilized. This is a new recommendation based on recent research results from The Source Marketing Research. -
Page9of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
Additional Campaign Elements
Promotional/Event Collateral Stickers Campaign Dates: May - October 2000 Description/Unit: 4-color stickers. Four to a sheet (three stickers with the Flood Control message and one with the NPDES message). Planned Quantity: 10,000 of four different designs for a total of 40,000.
A promotional tool used to target and educate children on the dangers of flooding, the stickers are printed on a vinyl paper that allow them to be easily removed from surfaces and reused. They will be distributed to children in elementary schools and at promotional events attended by a representative of the Regional Flood Control District.
1999 Collateral Sticker Summary: The stickers were distributed to children ages 2-l 1 through promotional events and visits to area elementary schools.
Update of CCRFCD Brochure Cbmpaign Dates: Sept. .- Nov. Description/Unit: Update and revise 1999 CCRFCD brochure for 2000. Save to disk and submit to client for printing. Planned Quantity: One version of the updated brochure on disk.
1999 CCRFCD Brochure Summary: The Merica Agency updated and revised the 1998 brochure for I 999 and submitted to client on disk for printing and distribution.
Milk Cartons Campaign Dates: TBD (depending on availability). 10 - 14 day periods. Description/Unit: 3 messages (flash floods, NPDES and flood insurance). Planned Quantity: Message will be displayed on one panel of l/2 gallon milk cartons and will be distributed through Oreo convenience - stores and Anderson Dairy. An exact number of milk cartons cannot be given. - 1999 Milk Carton Summary: Three messages were distributed through area convenience stores and Anderson Dairy in 1999 during the months of - June, July and August. An exact number of milk cartons cannot be provided by Anderson Dairy representatives. - - L
Page 10 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
Public Relations Recommendations
Due to the discontinuation of the Clark County Regional Flood Control - District/McDonald’s Flood Awareness Trayliner promotion, Faiss Foley Merica Public Relations, the public relations and government affairs arm of The Merica Agency, has devised a new, multi-phase public relations campaign for 2000 that we feel will garner as much, if not more positive press than the trayliner program. While it would be best to - implement the entire program, the program has been designed so that the phases could be implemented individually.
1) Annual Flood Awareness Poster Contest - To replace the McDonald’s Trayliner program, Faiss Foley Merica has come up with an idea that would reach the same audience, yet would have more media mileage. We are suggesting that the Clark - County Regional Flood Control District sponsor an annual poster contest that would be promoted throughout the Valley’s elementary schools. We would have elementary children submit flood awareness drawings to the District throughout - the flood season. At the end of the flood season, we would choose one drawing that would be made into a poster and unveiled at the beginning of the next year’s flood season. A press conference with the winning entry and its artist would be held, just like the unveiling of the trayliner. The posters would then be distributed to the local schools and the media. We feel that this could be a great annual program that the District would have complete ownership. We also feel this program would reach more children than the trayliner and we could still promote the entries and winners through our affiliation with the Fox 5 Kid’s Club. - 2) Media Bus Tour - Faiss Foley Merica is suggesting that CCRFCD host a media bus tour that would tour media members around the valley pointing out projects that + - have already been completed and projects that are in the works as part of the District’s lo-year plan. The half-day event would begin with the media bus tour and conclude with lunch and a question and answer session. We feel the District would find the media tour to be a valuable tool in educating the media first-hand. Faiss Foley Merica would coordinate with the District in all aspects of planning, coordinating and executing this program. A member of the District would serve - as the tour guide during the event and would answer media questions during the question and answer session.’
3) DMV Partnership - Faiss Foley Merica would like to coordinate with the Department of Motor Vehicles to accomplish one of more of the following:
A. A question concerning flood awareness included of the Nevada State Driver’s License Exam. B. A pamphlet on flood awareness inserted into the Nevada State Driver’s Handbook.
Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
C. Flood awareness information posted on the Department of Motor Vehicle’s website and a hot link established from the DMV website to CCRFCD’s website.
Faiss Foley Merica would be instrumental in coordinating with the proper agencies to get this accomplished.
4) Clark County Flash Flood Awareness Month - Faiss Foley Merica has discovered that there is no locally recognized Flash Flood Awareness Month, Week or even Day. We are suggesting that we assist CCRFCD in getting the month of June locally recognized as Clark County Flash Flood Awareness Month. During the month, we would send out press releases about flood awareness and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District. Faiss Foley Merica would work with the proper local and state agencies to get this accomplished.
-
--
-
Page 12 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
- Proposed Plan Price Estimate - Proposed Work Plan Task/Description Price Estimate - I. Outdoor Billboards
Storage Costs for the outdoor billboard $ 3,000 vinyl flexes during the months Nov.-April.
Placement (permanent and rotary) of 8-l 1 $ 68,000 billboards for the proposed six month period from May through October.
II. Busstop Shelter Signage
Design, art direction, photography rights, $ 4,500 production and account management of approximately 15 - 30 full-color electrostatic -d laminated busstop shelter posters.
Placement and posting of approximately 1 S-30 $ 13,000 busstop shelter posters in areas not serviced by outdoor billboards for the proposed six month period from May through October. - Ill. Radio Traffic Report Sponsorships
- Placement of approximately 95 spots per week, $ 54,000 1 O-second closing messages for the Metro Traffic Control traffic reports during morning drive (6-9 a.m.1 and afternoon drive (3-6 .m.), every week for the period from June 5 t I: rough September 24. The approved scripts that aired in 1999 will again be - used for 2000. .
Due to the high growth of the Las Vegas valley and Clark County, there is a substantial increase in demand for the Metro Radio Traffic Reports. An increase in cost is reflected in the placement figure.
Page 13 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
IV. Television/Kids Club
Production and account management of updated/ $ 4,200 revised newsletter print ad and other promotional opportunities (movie releases, television sponsorship promotional spots, etc.) Account management of one X&second infomercial/PSA spot.
Placement of one N-second infomercial spot $ 35,000 to run in children’s programming (Monday-Friday 3-5 p.m.) for six-month period from May through October. Includes sponsorship ID on Kids Club event promotional spots, placement of ad in quarterly newsletter, and other promotional opportunities.
V. Print
Welcome Home Magazine
Production and account management $ 1,500 of one half-page full color ad.
Placement of one, half-page, full-color ad in $ 2,100 all four issues (Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter) - of Welcome Home Magazine for 2000.
Laughlin Nevada Times -
Art direction, production and account management $ 1,000 of a black-and-white, 21 column inch ad.
Placement of one black-and-white 21 column inch ad $ 1,800 for the months of June, July and August.
Specialty Publications
Art direction, production and account management $ 2,000 of black-and-white, l/3 page ad.
Placement of six total black-and-white, l/3 page ads $ 5,200 for the months of June - September. /--
Page 14 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 - SCOPE OF CONTRACT SERVICES 2000 FLOOD SAFETY ADVERTISING SERVICES
-
VI. Promotional/Event Collateral Stickers
Reprint of four different designs, four-color $ 4,500 at a quantity of 10,000 each for a total of 40,000 - stickers (three stickers with Flood Control message and one with NPDES message).
- VII. Update/New CCRFCD Brochure
Design, production and account management. $ 3,000 - VIII. Milk Cartons
Use two existing messages (one message for $ 600 Flood Control and one message for NPDES) and produce one new message (flood insurance). - Placement of 2-3 messages for available $0 periods of 1 O-l 4 days each. Exact season to be confirmed (Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer). Also, overrun placement when available.
- IX. Public Relations Campaign Plan 1 - Annual Poster Contest $ 3,000 - Production and printing of coloring $ 1,200 sheets and framing of the selected winners piece. - Plan 2 - Media Bus Tour $ 6,000
- Plan 3 - DMV Partnership $ 2,000 Plan 4 - Flash Flood Awareness:I&nth:. _ $ 3,000 - X. Contingency
Attendance and presentation to the Citizens $ 6,400 Advisory Committee and the CCRFCD Board of Directors.
P -/ Total Estimated Annual Cost: $ 225,000 -
Page 150f 15 EXHIBIT 2 - SCHEDULE OF TASK COMPLETION :-..
Merica20CKl
Media Schedule
Billboards
Radio Traflic Reports
Kids Club
Print Media
PR Camapign
Brochure Update
Anderson Dairy
Campaign Evaluation - ia Development s Production Placement
-
-
- - EXHIBIT 3 - SCHEDULE OF AGENCY SERVICES - ‘u’ THE MERICA AGENCY - ADVERTISING A ND PUBLIC RELATIONS - HOURLY RATES
- HOURLY RATES:
- PARTNERS BILLABLE RATE $150.00
- RATESFOROTHERTHANPARTNERS: CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT $80.00 to $150.00 - ART DIRECTOR DESIGN PRODUCTION/LAYOUT - PROJECT SUPERVISION
-d’ DESIGN $80.00 to $150.00
PRODUCTION $80.00 to $150.00
COPYWRITING $100.00 to $120.00
PUBLIC RELATIONS/MAJOR EVENTS $80.00 to $120.00
ACCOUNT SERVICES $40.00 to $120.00
PRODUCTION COST:
OUTSIDE SERVICES 20% of the GROSS l *** _. PHOTOGRAPHY 25% of the GROSS **** / ‘t MEDIA:
BILLED AT AGENCY’S REDUCED BULK RATE - 15% of the GROSS l ****
/ *t** Standard agency mark-up of the net vendor cost, without tax. * l *tt* Allowing for 15% of the gross amount for media commission