DOCSLIB.ORG

An Investigation Into the UK's Largest Public Aquarium Chain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Investigation Into the UK's Largest Public Aquarium Chain An investigation into the UK’s largest public aquarium chain Full study report C. Palmer/CAPS 2014 An Investigation into the UK’s Largest Public Aquarium Chain, C.Palmer/Captive Animals’ Protection Society, 2014 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Definition of a 'Zoo' ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Sea Life Aquariums ............................................................................................................................. 6 2. METHODS ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Data Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3. SEA LIFE AND DOLPHINARIUMS .................................................................................................................... 8 4. FROM OCEAN TO TANK ............................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Origin of Animals at Sea Life ............................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Display of Wild-Caught Animals ........................................................................................................ 13 5. CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................................................ 25 5.1 'Finding Nemo' Exhibits ..................................................................................................................... 27 5.2 Conservation Initiatives at Sea Life ................................................................................................... 28 5.3 Types of Species at Sea Life .............................................................................................................. 29 5.4 Sea Life and Fishing ........................................................................................................................... 34 5.5 Ex-Situ Conservation ......................................................................................................................... 35 5.6 Rescue and Release of Animals......................................................................................................... 39 6. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH .................................................................................................................................. 40 7. EDUCATION.................................................................................................................................................. 41 8. ANIMAL WELFARE ....................................................................................................................................... 44 8.1 Tank Type .......................................................................................................................................... 46 8.2 Life in a Sea Life Tank ........................................................................................................................ 47 9. CAPTIVITY STRESS ........................................................................................................................................ 63 9.1 CASE STUDY: Surface Breaking Behaviour at Ray Pools.................................................................... 65 9.2 CASE STUDY: Interaction with Transparent Boundaries at Chelonia Exhibits .................................. 67 10. HEALTH AND DISEASE ................................................................................................................................ 70 11. VISITOR BEHAVIOUR .................................................................................................................................. 72 11.1 Close Encounters ............................................................................................................................ 73 11.2 Touch Pools ..................................................................................................................................... 75 12. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................. 78 1 An Investigation into the UK’s Largest Public Aquarium Chain, C.Palmer/Captive Animals’ Protection Society, 2014 The UK Government defines a zoo as: 'An establishment where wild animals are kept for exhibition (other than a circus or a pet shop) to which members of the public have access, with or without charge for admission, on more than seven days in any period of twelve consecutive months' (Zoo Licensing Act 1981). Aquariums can therefore be considered zoos for aquatic animals. Displays of captive animals have existed since ancient times. The predecessor of the zoo is the menagerie, which has a long history from the ancient world to modern times. Animal burials have revealed that one of the oldest menageries was located at Hierakonpolis, Egypt at circa. 3500 B.C. (Archaeology website). The oldest zoo in existence today is Vienna Zoo, and this facility was constructed in Vienna by Emperor Franz Josef in 1752 (The Times of India website). Zoos, aquaria and marine parks were, until recently, generally accepted forms of entertainment with little thought given to their purpose, or the welfare of the animals in these facilities (Marino et al., 2010). Ostensibly, zoos provide an opportunity for people to get close to animals. Yet there is more to zoos and aquariums than meets the eye. Exactly what are we learning about other animals in these facilities? And what is it like for them, living in confinement? There are thousands of zoos around the world, with hundreds of millions of visitors each year. There is, undoubtedly, a strong motivation amongst people to view animals in close proximity. Most of the ethical concerns that result from the incarceration of wild animals are countered by the zoo industry; an industry that perpetrates the myth that people need to get up close to animals to learn about them and form a desire to protect them in the wild. The experience of interacting with other animals should enhance our understanding of our interconnected, mutually shared environment, yet the very nature of zoos curb any such insights. In fact, the lesson that zoos teach us about wild animals and their environment is a dangerous one: that non-human animals can justifiably be confined by us, primarily for our entertainment. Zoo legislation, accreditation schemes and bodies, such as the World Association for Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) and British and Irish Association of Zoos and Aquariums (BIAZA), do not question the existence of zoos. WAZA and BIAZA are, in fact, composed of zoological institutions, and thus act as something akin to trade representatives for the industry. Legislation, accreditation schemes and bodies, rather, seek to regulate the facilities to ensure they maintain so-called standards, and keep up with the times, with regards to public opinion. The zoo industry also undoubtedly has much input and influence over the legislation. It is therefore animal protection organisations, rather than the governments and regulating bodies, which have revealed zoos and aquaria to be inherently detrimental to animal welfare. Sadly, very little meaningful legal protection exists for animals housed in zoos and aquariums - penalties for violations of legislation are minor, and the agencies that perform zoo inspections are extremely understaffed relative to the number of facilities requiring examination. A study published in 2012 by Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS) revealed over 1,000 instances of breach of legal obligations by zoos in England, and an almost complete absence of enforcement action between 2006 and 2011. Nearly 90% of zoos were found to be non- 2 An Investigation into the UK’s Largest Public Aquarium Chain, C.Palmer/Captive Animals’ Protection Society, 2014 compliant with one or more aspect of the Council Directive 1999/22/EC (‘the EC Zoos Directive’) during the 2006 and 2011 period (CAPS, 2012). A 2014 study by Born Free Foundation (BFF) further concluded that the inspections required by UK law are failing to ensure the welfare of animals in zoos (BFF website; The Times website). In modern times, awareness of the natural world, animal welfare, and environmental issues has come to the forefront. With this has created the need for captive animal facilities to reinvent themselves as centres working to educate on and conserve animal species. They have needed to portray themselves as 'Noah’s Arks' for animals at threat in nature. It is a thinly-veiled façade however, and zoos continue to exist predominantly as commercial operations profiting from the display of animals for public entertainment. A confined animal is denied freedom and the ability to make life decisions that are so necessary for its well- being.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition to List Eight Species of Pomacentrid Reef Fish, Including the Orange Clownfish and Seven Damselfish, As Threatened Or Endangered Under the U.S
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE PETITION TO LIST EIGHT SPECIES OF POMACENTRID REEF FISH, INCLUDING THE ORANGE CLOWNFISH AND SEVEN DAMSELFISH, AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Orange Clownfish (Amphiprion percula) photo by flickr user Jan Messersmith CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 Notice of Petition Rebecca M. Blank Acting Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Samuel Rauch Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries NOAA Fisheries National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration 1315 East-West Highway Silver Springs, MD 20910 E-mail: [email protected] PETITIONER Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 436-9682 _____________________ Date: September 13, 2012 Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Miyoko Sakashita Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R.§ 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity hereby petitions the Secretary of Commerce and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS” or “NOAA Fisheries”), to list eight pomacentrid reef fish and to designate critical habitat to ensure their survival. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of imperiled species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center has more than 350,000 members and online activists throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Today a Treasure Yesterday a Dream
    Yesterday a Dream Today a Treasure 2010 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY We hope you will enjoy this annual report as it takes you on a journey through the last Table of Contents 100 years at the Saint Louis Treasured Memories Zoo. Many changes have been made throughout the Y esterday a Dream, Today a Treasure…Tomorrow a Promise ..........................................................3 years, but the heart of the Memories Abound .......................................................................................................................5 Zoo remains the same: A Zootennial Celebration ..............................................................................................................7 Animals Always. Enriching the Community .............................................................................................................9 JoAnn Arnold Animals Always ..........................................................................................................................11 Chair, Saint Louis Zoological The Living Promise – A Campaign for the Future .........................................................................13 Park Subdistrict Commission Jeffrey P. Bonner, Ph.D. Donors, Volunteers and Staff Dana Brown President & CEO St. Louis Zoological Park Subdistrict Commission .......................................................................18 Saint Louis Zoo Association Board of Directors ...........................................................................18 Endowment Trust Board of Directors ...........................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 3: 41–50, 2008 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Printed August 2008 doi: 10.3354/ab00062 Aquat Biol Published online July 1, 2008 OPEN ACCESS Effects of water temperature, salinity and feeding regimes on metamorphosis, growth and otolith Sr:Ca ratios of Megalops cyprinoides leptocephali Hui-Lun Chen1, Kang-Ning Shen1, Chih-Wei Chang3, 4, Yoshiyuki Iizuka5, Wann-Nian Tzeng1, 2,* 1Institute of Fisheries Science, and 2Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106, ROC 3National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung, Taiwan 944, ROC 4Institute of Marine Biodiversity and Evolution, National Donghwa University, Hualien, Taiwan 974, ROC 5Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 115, ROC National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106, ROC ABSTRACT: We examined the effects of water temperature, salinity and feeding regime on lepto- cephalus metamorphosis, and on daily growth increment deposition and strontium:calcium (Sr:Ca) ratios of otoliths in the Pacific tarpon Megalops cyprinoides. The tarpons at the pre-metamorphic lep- tocephalus stage (SI) were collected in the estuary, marked with tetracycline and then reared for 18 and 30 d in 2 independent experiments with different temperatures (20, 25 and 30°C), salinities (0, 10 and 35) and feeding regimes (fed and starved)—environmental conditions that the fish may experi- ence in the wild. Temporal changes in Sr:Ca ratios from the primordium to the otolith edge of the reared tarpon were examined with an electron probe microanalyzer. At the optimal temperature (25°C) in Expt I, the leptocephalus completed metamorphosis (SII and SIII) after ca. 2 wk irrespective of being fed or starved and reared in low (10) or high (35) salinity, although both somatic and otolith growth rates were lower in starved than in fed groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • MAF Underwatermission Synopsis Final
    Conceived by Max Serio Developed by Max Serio, John Hopkins, Martin Kase, Tina Dalton Directed by Max Serio, Tina Dalton Narrated by Rachel King, Juliet Jordan, Marcello Fabrizi Underwater Mission: Cleaner Friends First episode of the series. Our heroes: Sara,Maxi and Emma the sea turtle will explore who are their Cleaner Friends. Their adventure will be supported with the valuable information of "Sea Pad" their "friend-board computer". Cleaner Friends : Cleaner shrimp,moray eel,Blue Streak Cleaner Wrasse,Moorish Idols,Humphead Wrasse,Spadefish, sea star,Mushroom Coral,Bristletooths. Underwater Mission: Predators In this episode Sara and Max will experience an interesting trip with Emma the sea tur- tle. “Sea Pad” is going to show them the most interesting underwater predators and their habbits. Predators : Mooray eel (Ribbon eel, White eyed moray eel), Sand conger eel, Barracudas, Stonefish, Anglerfish, Lionfish, Mantis Shrimp, White tip reef shark, Tiger Shark Underwater Mission: Crazy Colours Maxi and Sara are going to visit the most colourful environment they have ever seen. Emma the sea turtle will take them to an underwater trip where they find the beautiful wolrd of crazy-coloured fish. Crazy-coloured fish : Gold Belly Damsel Fish, Emperor Angelfish, Yellow Ribbon Sweetlip, Peach Fairies, Anemones, Corals, Clown Trigger fish, Butterfly fish, Leopard coral trout, Scribbled Filefish, Lionfish, Cuttlefish, Nudibranch, Parrotfish Underwater Mission: Startling Shapes There are many shapes that the sea creatures and objects have. Emma, Sara and Maxi are going to discover as much of them as they can. Those they can’t spot on the first glance will be uncovered by the trusted clever “Sea pad”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for a Dolphin Sea Refuge in Italy: a Concept Paper
    THE CASE FOR A DOLPHIN SEA REFUGE IN ITALY: A CONCEPT PAPER GIUSEPPE NOTARBARTOLO DI SCIARA TETHYS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | VIALE G.B. GADIO 2, 20121 MILAN, ITALY JOAN GONZALVO TETHYS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | VIALE G.B. GADIO 2, 20121 MILAN, ITALY SANDRO MAZZARIOL RIVIERA BOSCO PICCOLO 101, 30034 MIRA (VE), ITALY GAIA ANGELINI LAV | VIALE REGINA MARGHERITA 177, 00198 ROMA, ITALY CATHY WILLIAMSON WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION | BROOKFIELD HOUSE, 38 ST PAUL ST, CHIPPENHAM SN15 1LJ, UNITED KINGDOM espite an increasing human global population, urbanization and industrialization, our interest Din animal welfare continues to increase. Indeed, despite great social, political and civil concerns, Mahatma Gandhi is reported as stating “The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated”. Thus it is imperative that we examine the way we currently treat dolphins and whales, species known for their intelligence and complex social interactions, and strive to improve our behaviour with respect to these animals. Rather than use these animals as sources of entertainment in conditions that do not meet their social and physical needs, we must develop facilities that can humanely care for sick and stranded animals, and provide refuge for animals without housing options. The development of a dolphin refuge in Italy will represent an important milestone in the evolution of our attitude to cetaceans. Frances M.D. Gulland, Vet DM, PhD Marine Mammal Center, Sausalito, California 1 WHYWHY AA DOLPHINDOLPHIN REFUGEREFUGE ININ ITALYITALY major campaign against dolphins in captivity guidelines2. conducted in Europe by several organisations A such as the Born Free Foundation, Whale Such facility could also support any possible and Dolphin Conservation, the Italian Lega Anti rehabilitation efforts of wild dolphins that strand Vivisezione LAV and Marevivo is beginning to bear alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Bülent's High Energy Reef
    FOURTH QUARTER 2016 I VOLUME 10 Plectranthias pelicieri: ONE ASTONISHING PERCHLET BÜLENT’S HIGH ENERGY REEF BOXING SHRIMPS in the ring! Reef Hobbyist Magazine 1 FOURTH QUARTER 2016 | Volume 10 FEATURES Copyright © 2016 Reef Hobbyist Magazine. All rights reserved. ANNOUNCEMENTS KEEPING LPS HAPPY • Care to share your breeding or husbandry success with the world? We are Debora Długopolska lives in Poland always looking for interesting articles to share with our readers. Email us your 6 and has been keeping reefs for ideas through the "Contact Us" tab on our website. 4 years. During that time, she has refined her • Hard copy subscriptions are available to hobbyists in the United States! Scan the methodology with LPS and explains the approach that QR code below or visit us at www.reefhobbyistmagazine.com to subscribe. has brought her success and led to this beautiful tank. RHM-SPONSORED EVENTS PLECTRANTHIAS PELICIERI: ONE (our latest issues are available at these sponsored events) 12 ASTONISHING PERCHLET • Red River Reef & Reptile Expo: October 1, Fargo, ND Mindy van Leur has been a reefkeeper since the redriverreefandreptileexpo.com early 90s with an affinity for SPS corals and helping • Mid-Atlantic Marine Aquarium Expo: October 8, Chesapeake, VA new hobbyists. Mindy is understandably enchanted midatlanticmas.org/mamax-2016/ with her Pelicier’s Perchlet and shares its charms • Ladies Frag Swapping Bi-annual Frag Party: October 8, Sturgis, MI with our readers. • Reeftoberfest: October 15, Las Vegas, NV reefsoflasvegas.com/events NOT ANOTHER BRINE • Aquatic Experience: November 4-6, Chicago, IL SHRIMP ARTICLE aquaticexperience.org 18 Jason Oneppo is a 25-year veteran • Lonestar Marine Aquarist Rally: November 6, San Antonio, TX in the aquarium industry and has been doing R&D maast.org/lmar for San Francisco Bay Brand for more than a • Reef-A-Palooza: November 19-20, Costa Mesa, CA decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Ornamental Coral Reef Wildlife: Successes, Shortcomings, and Future Directions Q ⇑ Laura E
    Biological Conservation 169 (2014) 225–237 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review Conservation and management of ornamental coral reef wildlife: Successes, shortcomings, and future directions q ⇑ Laura E. Dee a, Stephanie S. Horii a, Daniel J. Thornhill b, a Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2400 Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA b Department of Conservation Science and Policy, Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA article info abstract Article history: Trade in ornamental coral reef wildlife supports a multi-million dollar industry but in some places threat- Received 23 August 2013 ens vulnerable coral reef species and ecosystems due to unsustainable practices and lack of effective reg- Received in revised form 12 November 2013 ulation. To supply this trade, fishers sometimes deplete fish populations and rely on practices, such as Accepted 14 November 2013 cyanide fishing, that harm coral reef organisms and habitats. The number of countries involved, dispersed fishing localities, and the diversity of species in trade present considerable impediments to conservation and management. For instance, traditional fisheries management techniques such as stock assessments Keywords: and total catch limits may not be feasible for ornamental fisheries, which are characterized by limited Aquarium trade data on population dynamics, stock status, and collection effort, as well as instances of illegal, underre- Coral reef conservation Coral reef fisheries ported, and unregulated fishing. A number of strategies to monitor, regulate, and manage the trade have Ornamental fisheries been implemented with varying efficacy. In order to learn from previous attempts and identify promising Sustainable fisheries management approaches, we reviewed selected management practices and regulations from diverse settings, with attention to the effectiveness of each approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Perceptions of Behavioral Enrichment: Assumptions Gone Awry
    Zoo Biology 17:525–534 (1998) Public Perceptions of Behavioral Enrichment: Assumptions Gone Awry M.E. McPhee,1* J.S. Foster,2 M. Sevenich,3 and C.D. Saunders4 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 2Seneca Zoo Society, Rochester, New York 3Disney’s Animal Kingdom, Lake Buena Vista, Florida 4Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, Illinois More and more, zoos are integrating behavioral enrichment programs into their management routines. Given the newness of such programs on an official level, however, there are an increasing number of enrichment decisions based on as- sumption. Enrichment is typically not provided on exhibit, especially for exhib- its considered to be more naturalistic, because it is assumed to affect visitors’ experience negatively. To test that assumption, visitors were interviewed in front of four exhibits—an outdoor barren grotto, an outdoor vegetated grotto, an in- door immersion exhibit, and an outdoor traditional cage—each with either natu- ral, nonnatural or no enrichment objects present. Specifically, we wanted to know whether 1) the exhibit’s perceived educational message, 2) the animal’s per- ceived “happiness,” and 3) the visitor perceptions of enrichment, the naturalism of animal’s behavior, and zoo animal well-being changed as a function of object type. Overall, the type of enrichment object had little impact on visi- tor perceptions. In the outdoor barren grotto, only visitor perceptions of ex- hibit naturalism were affected by object type. In the outdoor vegetated grotto, object type influenced visitors perceptions of enrichment and exhibit natu- ralism. For the indoor immersion exhibit, general perceptions of enrichment and the perceived naturalism of the animal’s behavior were affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena Lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae)
    Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae) Date By From Version 2005 Leanne Hayter Ultimo TAFE v 1 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ 5 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 GENERAL FEATURES ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 HISTORY IN CAPTIVITY ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 EDUCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 CONSERVATION & RESEARCH ........................................................................................................ 10 3 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................12 3.1 NOMENCLATURE ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 OTHER SPECIES ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]