DOCSLIB.ORG

AFATDS: the Fire Support Window to the 21St Century by STEVEN W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AFATDS: the Fire Support Window to the 21St Century by STEVEN W ■ AFATDS: The Fire Support Window to the 21st Century By STEVEN W. BOUTELLE and RONALD FILAK DOD Multiple rocket launch system. he trend toward “third wave warfare” bombing, it is becoming more identified with ac- (namely, de-massing and customizing curate sensors, weapons systems, and munitions. forces and weapons) and creation of a T digitized battlefield has been widely A Joint Resource discussed within the Army. And although doctri- Advances in weaponry and targeting have nal and organizational implications must be fi- increased the burden of managing fire support nalized, it is clear that smaller, more dispersed operations, always a complex and exacting forces as well as joint and combined capabilities process. This difficulty, however, is being lessened will be hallmarks of future operations. Further- greatly by automation. The Army advanced field more, command and control (C2) systems that artillery tactical data system (AFATDS) is about to support JFCs must provide horizontal and vertical make its third wave warfare debut. This state-of- interoperability and be able to exchange situa- the-art system supports the need for horizontal tional awareness information across the force. and vertical interoperability, distribution of situa- This also is true of fire support—that is, can- tional awareness information, and automation in nons, rockets, missiles, mortars, naval guns, and the process of matching fire support weapons sys- bombs—which provide lethal, flexible, and deci- tems against high-payoff targets. sive assets to JFCs in prosecuting the battle. From the field artillery digital automated While fire support has long been characterized by computer of the 1960s to the tactical fire direction massed fires such as artillery barrages or carpet system (TACFIRE) of the 1980s and the initial fire support automated system of today, the field ar- tillery community has been in the forefront in au- tomated support for commanders in combat. Colonel Steven W. Boutelle, USA, is project manager for Field Artillery AFATDS developers have drawn on experience Tactical Data Systems and Lieutenant Colonel Ronald Filak, USA (Ret.), from earlier systems—coupled with requirements is a member of Computer Sciences Corporation. 16 JFQ / Spring 1996 Boutelle and Filak analysis and ongoing feedback from soldiers and as field artillery assets (cannons, rockets, and mis- marines in the field and advanced warfighting ex- siles). This automated analysis process also en- periments—to develop a C2 system responsive to a ables a fire support commander to automatically commander’s needs by supporting: generate and digitally distribute fire support an- ■ the integration of all fire support assets into the nexes and plans. planning and execution of support for the maneuver Second, the exchange of situational aware- commander’s operation ness information allows AFATDS to constantly ■ the application of commander’s guidance to pri- provide up-to-date graphic depictions of battle- oritize targets, enabling fire support assets to be directed field information. This provides commanders at the most relevant and important enemy assets timely information with which to formulate or ■ the automated exchange of digitized target in- adjust guidance while eliminating the need to formation and situational awareness with other units transport and post (via grease pencils and tape) throughout the joint force. bulky situation maps. While AFATDS was originally an Army sys- tem, it is now joint and under development by Target Acquisition the Army for its own requirements and those of Since it is interoperable with a variety of C2 the Marine Corps. A major portion of version 2 systems, AFATDS provides commanders with development incorporates major advances in the ability to see the battlefield the Armed Forces are taking Marine-unique require- and plan future operations. Intelligence collec- ments. Furthermore, pre- tion systems can develop large amounts of data a quantum leap in conducting liminary discussions are un- on potential targets throughout a battlefield. fire support operations in aid derway on the applicability AFATDS provides commanders interoperability of the “core software en- of a single service or JFC with the all source analysis system (ASAS), an au- gine” of AFATDS to the fire tomated Army C2 system used by the intelli- support roles of the Air gence/electronic warfare community. ASAS, in Force and Navy. This article discusses operational, turn, provides access to targeting information via technical, and interoperability features of AFATDS Trojan Spirit and tactical intelligence collection that provide JFCs and fire support coordinators systems. Trojan Spirit offers a communications (FSCOORDs) with these capabilities. gateway to national intelligence databases and multiservice tactical intelligence systems includ- Operational ing material from the Central Intelligence With AFATDS, the Armed Forces and fire sup- Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and Na- port community are taking a quantum leap in the tional Security Agency, as well as tactical target ability to provide timely help for conducting fire data from systems such as the joint surveillance support operations in aid of a single service or JFC. target attack radar system (JSTARS), the Guardrail The operational capability of AFATDS is made up and Rivet Joint electronic intelligence collection of 27 major functional capabilities in five func- systems, and the Air Force tactical reconnaissance tional categories. The breadth of fire support func- aircraft (see figure on next page). tionality and horizontal interoperability of AFATDS make it the most comprehensive informa- Planning tion warfare combat system available. The fire sup- At the same time weapon systems are be- port planning function provides FSCOORDs with coming more capable of attacking identified tar- several key capabilities. gets with pin-point accuracy. It may no longer be First, since the concepts of operation and necessary to launch a wave of bombers or mass guidance are entered into its database, AFATDS an attack by tube artillery to take out a critical can assist in performing course of action analysis target. Instead, planners—through the AFATDS– on alternative battle plans. Operators can adjust ASAS interoperability capability—can open the any combination of variables to identify the im- door to a storehouse of available targeting infor- pact of the changes on the ability of fire support mation and use automated target analysis and to sustain a commander’s plans. The same degree target attack capability from AFATDS to match of flexibility allows for the application of analysis weapons assets against selected targets. If a situa- against several options proposed by JFCs to deter- tion warrants—against tactical missiles such as mine which plan is most supportable from a fire Scuds—this can be done in seconds and without support perspective. AFATDS performs this analy- human intervention. sis using information on all types of available fire While providing access to this vast array of support: air attack (including attack helicopter information, AFATDS also uses distribution crite- and fixed-wing close air support), naval gunfire, ria and graphic overlay filters to ensure that users mortars and offensive electronic warfare, as well Spring 1996 / JFQ 17 ■ FIRE SUPPORT WINDOW AFATDS operators in a corps fire support element National, Strategic, and Tactical Sensors Linked to (FSE) normally observe status down to the battal- Fire Support Weapons Systems. ion level. However, the AFATDS database has in- TIBS formation on firing platoons and batteries that constitute each battalion. This data is successively TR-1 “rolled up” to develop status on the battalion. NATIONAL ASSETS Corps FSE operators can institute a parameter JSTARS that tells the computer to distill the information on subordinate units and report status at battal- ion level. (Concurrently, counterparts at division FSE or division artillery level can establish para- meters, with the same database, at battery or fir- ing platoon level.) Corps FSE operators can change a parameter to allow insight into specific GROUND PROCESSING GROUND information that applies to any of the firing pla- FACILITY STATION MODULE toons within a given area. The fire support execution portion of MLRS AFATDS implements many functions which have MLRS not been previously automated. In providing au- (ATACMS-Equipped) tomated target analysis—ensuring that the right TROJAN SPIRIT target is engaged at the right time by the right AFATDS ASAS weapon/ammunition mix—AFATDS offers major MLRS FIRE DIRECTION increases in speed fire mission processing. (Perfor- CENTER mance tests indicate that AFATDS processes mis- sions in 10 to 50 percent of the time for Army training standards.) Fire support execution fea- receive only needed information. Operator con- tures include: trolled distribution lists filter the information ■ elimination of “first in, first out” processing and which is conveyed by AFATDS to its subordinate engaging of targets: target management matrix and stations. For example, an AFATDS operator can high payoff target list tools provide for sensor inputs to establish distribution criteria for remote stations be matched against concept of the operation and fire that will provide only information of importance. support guidance to move important targets to the Although vast amounts of information reside front of the queue in the AFATDS computer, map, and overlay tools, ■ a database of unit information,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe
    Chapter v1 THE AMERICAN BATTLEFIELDS NORTH OF PARIS chapter gives brief accounts of areas and to all of the American ceme- all American fighting whi ch oc- teries and monuments. This route is Thiscurred on the battle front north of recommended for those who desire to Paris and complete information concern- make an extended automobile tour in the ing the American military cemeteries and region. Starting from Paris, it can be monuments in that general region. The completely covered in four days, allowing military operations which are treated are plenty of time to stop on the way. those of the American lst, 27th, 30th, The accounts of the different operations 33d, 37th, 80th and 91st Divisions and and the descriptions of the American the 6th and 11 th Engineer Regiments. cemeteries and monuments are given in Because of the great distances apart of the order they are reached when following So uthern Encr ance to cb e St. Quentin Can al Tunnel, Near Bellicourc, October 1, 1918 the areas where this fighting occurred no the suggested route. For tbis reason they itinerary is given. Every operation is do not appear in chronological order. described, however, by a brief account Many American units otber tban those illustrated by a sketch. The account and mentioned in this chapter, sucb as avia- sketch together give sufficient information tion, tank, medical, engineer and infantry, to enable the tourist to plan a trip through served behind this part of the front. Their any particular American combat area. services have not been recorded, however, The general map on the next page as the space limitations of tbis chapter indicates a route wbich takes the tourist required that it be limited to those Amer- either int o or cl ose to all of tbese combat ican organizations which actually engaged (371) 372 THE AMERICAN B ATTLEFIELD S NO R TH O F PARIS Suggested Tour of American Battlefields North of Paris __ Miles Ghent ( î 37th and 91st Divisions, Ypres-Lys '"offensive, October 30-November 11, 1918 \ ( N \ 1 80th Division, Somme 1918 Albert 33d Division.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Messines
    CHAPTER XV THE BATTLE OF MESSINES-JUNE 7TH BEFOREmost great attacks on the Western Front, during that critical last night in which, generally, the infantry left its billets and made its way, first, in column of fours on dark roads beside moving wheel and motor traffic, then, usually in file, along tracks marked across the open, and finally into communication trenches to wind silently out in the small hours and line the “ jumping-off ” trenches or white tapes laid in the long wet grass of open No-Man’s Land, where for an hour or two it must await the signal to assault-during these critical hours one thought was usually uppermost in the men’s minds: does the enemy know? With the tactics of 1917,involving tremendous preparatory bombardments, which entailed months of preliminary railway and road construction, G.H.Q. had been forced to give up the notion of keeping an attack secret until it was delivered. Enemy airmen could not fail to observe these works and also the new camps, supply centres, casualty clearing stations, hangars for aeroplanes. Reference has been made to the Comniander-in-Chief’s desire to impart the impression, in April, of a serious attack, and,‘in May, of a feint. But the final week’s bombardment had given sure notice of the operation, and the most that could be hoped for was that the enemy might be deceived as to the main stroke that would come after, and might continue to expect it at Arras rather than at Ypres. As far as the Messines offensive went, the Germans must know that a great attack-whether feint or principal operation-was imminent ; indeed, German prisoners spoke with certainty of it.
    [Show full text]
  • This Index Lists the Army Units for Which Records Are Available at the Eisenhower Library
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. ARMY: Unit Records, 1917-1950 Linear feet: 687 Approximate number of pages: 1,300,000 The U.S. Army Unit Records collection (formerly: U.S. Army, U.S. Forces, European Theater: Selected After Action Reports, 1941-45) primarily spans the period from 1917 to 1950, with the bulk of the material covering the World War II years (1942-45). The collection is comprised of organizational and operational records and miscellaneous historical material from the files of army units that served in World War II. The collection was originally in the custody of the World War II Records Division (now the Modern Military Records Branch), National Archives and Records Service. The material was withdrawn from their holdings in 1960 and sent to the Kansas City Federal Records Center for shipment to the Eisenhower Library. The records were received by the Library from the Kansas City Records Center on June 1, 1962. Most of the collection contained formerly classified material that was bulk-declassified on June 29, 1973, under declassification project number 735035. General restrictions on the use of records in the National Archives still apply. The collection consists primarily of material from infantry, airborne, cavalry, armor, artillery, engineer, and tank destroyer units; roughly half of the collection consists of material from infantry units, division through company levels. Although the collection contains material from over 2,000 units, with each unit forming a separate series, every army unit that served in World War II is not represented. Approximately seventy-five percent of the documents are from units in the European Theater of Operations, about twenty percent from the Pacific theater, and about five percent from units that served in the western hemisphere during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff Publications Institute of 9-2020 Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort James B. Legg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Military History Commons Research Artillery Ammunition from the 1781 Siege of Star Fort By James B. Legg th Regular readers of Legacy, will recall that daily feature of the siege. By June 18 , the The 6-pounder was the standard field in 2018 and 2019, SCIAA Director Steve Americans were entrenched immediately caliber used by both British and American Smith conducted USC “Maymester” north of the ditch of Star Fort, but a large artillery during the Revolution. Historical archaeological field schools in and around relief force of British regular troops was sources indicate that the Americans used Star Fort, a component of the 1781 British on its way to break the siege. Greene at least four, 6-pounder field guns in defenses of Ninety Six, South Carolina, at decided to risk a direct assault on Star Fort the siege of Star Fort, while the British Ninety Six National Historic Site (Figures before giving up the siege, but the attack had only two or three 3-pounders, and 1 and 2). The work included formal met with a bloody repulse. Greene broke possibly some very light-caliber swivel excavation units, and an array of metal off the siege and withdrew the following guns. Nevertheless, we found both detector sample areas. Among our findings day, but the British then decided that the American and British 6-pounder shot in was a significant assemblage related to the post of Ninety Six was too exposed to be Star Fort.
    [Show full text]
  • 156 Field Artillery Battalion, Unit History United States Army
    Bangor Public Library Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl World War Regimental Histories World War Collections 1946 156 Field Artillery Battalion, unit history United States Army Follow this and additional works at: http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his Recommended Citation United States Army, "156 Field Artillery Battalion, unit history" (1946). World War Regimental Histories. 17. http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the World War Collections at Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. It has been accepted for inclusion in World War Regimental Histories by an authorized administrator of Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TO THE MEN OF THE 71ST INFANTRY REGIMENT 1945 COPYRIGHT, 1946, BY !56TH FIELD ARTILLERY BATTALI ON Typography, engraYings and printing by Army & NaYy Publishing Company 234 Main Street Baton Rouge, Louisiana 2 156 3 Page 4 [blank] The generous efforts of these men have made this book possible. Authors . CPL. CLINTON w. MEHRING CPL. EARL K. GuLLEN CAPT. MALCOLM P. McNAIR, JR. CAPT. JoHN B. BRICKHOUSE T / SGT. EDWARD w. STEELE, JR. S / SGT. RussELL P. HALL CPL. EARL TRIBOU CAPT. MENTER G. BAKER, JR. M / S GT . RoBERT E. WALKER Art . .. SGT. ARNOLD c. BLACK Photos . .. M / SGT. RoBERT E. WALKER T I 4 RoBERT L. HoLT T I 4 HAROLD G. FRIDDELL cw I 0 EDWARD c. ALLEN CAPT. EDwARD H. DEws PFc. FRED w. ELLIS CPL. RoBERT E. HowARD U.S. ARMY SIGNAL CoRPS U.S. CoAsT GuARD Edited by .
    [Show full text]
  • New York Division, National Guard, War Record
    :?.:sr tNSULAT] y..~.~— --• AMERICA Mt*al ui ~|" imin< M - - . r i -. -. - - - T r STATES -H ar.-: TZ1ZPH I NZ I ! S e--- zzzitz: sz e: :: 1-i.ia --- .:-.:.» re:. -e~ ei:r ."iie :.i- - ELE ": V.':: : H . Fre:_e-.:;. I_rre":s ?:.ve: =r.: >•: wi>ai BROOKZ •/ - zr:c a Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/newyorkdivisionnOOburd , L New York Division "X National Guard WAR RECORD By the OFFICERS AND MEN OF THE DIVISION Illustrated \vY wm Editor HENRY HAGAMAN BURDICK, Captain, Inf., U.S.R. (formerly 7th Infantry, N. G. U. S.) Associate Editor RUPERT LEE BURDICK ! Published by LrJ Burdick & King, New York. ^<$^4 Copyright 1917 R. L. Burdick SEP 14 1917 ©CI.A473463 This book is a semi-official record of the Federal Service of the New- York National Guard units. For the first time in the history of the militia Iffji* was this organization, in June, 1916, mustered into Federal Service for action outside the boundaries of our nation. When the Mexican crisis arose and the call came it found a ready response from the National Guard. Especially prompt was the preparation and mustering in of the New "\ ork 1 )i\ ision. Few of those who witnessed the departure of the various regiments can ever forget the fortitude of the men, many of whom were of the peace- ful, civilian population, who, disregarding selfish or pecuniary interests, entrained willingly to face, at the Mexican Border, what was confidently expected to be deadly warfare. That this service did not develop into such an unhappy conclusion does not minimize the courage of the men, but is rather a matter of congratulation.
    [Show full text]
  • From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916
    FROM BALLETICS TO BALLISTICS: FRENCH ARTILLERY, 1897-1916 From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916 JONATHAN KRAUSE* University of Wolverhampton Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The fighting on the Western Front during the First World War was characterized by the mass use of artillery and, thanks to scholarship from recent decades, is now understood as a crucible for learning and innovation. This article follows the trajectory of French artillery capabilities, mental and mechanical, from the late 19th century through to 1916. Introduction The First World War, fundamentally, was an artillery war. Central to every tactical question was the use of artillery: that of the attacker and the defender. The reason for this is largely technological. With the development of accurate, quick-firing artillery field armies would possess an unprecedented level of firepower. The 1890s introduced an era in which massed infantry charges could be largely turned back by artillery alone. These modern field guns could, if they chose, engage their targets from four to six kilometres away, thus freeing them from the constraints of their counterparts in the 1860s and 1870s, whose shorter ranges exposed them to deadly small arms fire. Against this new killing power there was little that infantry could do; little, that is, except dig. Trenches have always provided soldiers with protection from firepower. The same basic principles which Vauban had perfected in the 17th Century remained of vital importance well into the 20th. That the war on the Western Front was essentially a siege operation of unprecedented complexity and duration was not lost on the leadership of the French army.
    [Show full text]
  • NJDARM: Collection Guide
    NJDARM: Collection Guide - NEW JERSEY STATE ARCHIVES COLLECTION GUIDE Record Group: Department of Defense Subgroup: Adjutant General's Office (World War I) Series: Miscellaneous Records [Unprocessed Binders], c. 1917-c. 1918 Accession #: 1969.006 prob. Series #: SDEA7004 Guide Date: 4/1999 (CSM) Volume: 16.75 c.f. [121 binders] Contents Content Note This series contains records of the New Jersey National Guard during World War I. The records include, correspondence, company correspondence books, returns, charge sheets for individual soldiers who violated an Article of War, and orders. NOTE: These records have not been processed. Many binders have records related to earlier or later time periods, such as the Mexican Border Service and National Guard post-1919 records. Additionally, binders in other series, such as the Mexican Border Service and post-1919 National Guard binders, contain records related to World War I. This series is a combination of earlier series, specifically: Binders 160 and 174 in Box 1 were formerly part of Department of Defense, National Guard, Miscellaneous Correspondence - Post Civil War, 1860s-1920; Binders 7-191 in Boxes 1-34 were formerly part of Department of Defense, National Guard, Miscellaneous Records, 1909-1925. Contents Box 1 Book 160 - Pay Rolls for Troops B & D 1st Squadron Cavalry, Provisional Troop 1st Squadron Cavalry, Headquarters 1st Squadron Cavalry, Companies F, K, L and Headquarters Company 3rd Infantry, Companies A, I & K, 4th Infantry, and Companies L, Headquarters and a Detachment, 5th Infantry,
    [Show full text]
  • Massed Fires, Not Organic Formations: the Case for Returning Field
    SPOTLIGHT 20-1 Massed Fires, Not Organic Formations The Case for Returning Field Artillery Battalions to the DivArty by Colonel David E. Johnson, USA, Ret. and Lieutenant General David D. Halverson, USA, Ret. PUBLISHED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY APRIL 2020 With artillery, war is made. ISSUE —Napoleon To prevail in large-scale combat oper- ations against competent adversaries, U.S. Army divisional field artillery battal- The U.S. Army needs to realize that in large-scale combat operations (LSCO) ions should be controlled by a division against competent adversaries, its divisional field artillery battalions should artillery (DivArty) headquarters, rather be controlled by a division artillery (DivArty) headquarters rather than by than by brigade combat teams (BCT). brigade combat teams (BCTs). To make the case for this change, this essay SPOTLIGHT SCOPE will trace the history of how U.S. field artillery has evolved since its incep- • Traces the evolution of U.S. field tion; making the case requires understanding why field artillery battalions artillery since its inception. became organic to BCTs in the first place. • Describes the impact of modularity, This essay is not a call to return to the past—rather, it is a call to prepare for driven by the demands of extended counterinsurgency operations, on the future. If the joint force is to mass fires against a peer adversary, central- the U.S. Army’s ability to train for and ized control will be important, just as it was in World War II. Now, with the fight peer adversaries. need to converge fires and effects across multiple domains, it is even more essential.
    [Show full text]
  • 37 HOWITZER BATTERY, ROYAL FIELD ARTILLERY - AUGUST 1914 by Lieutenant Colonel Mike Watson, Section Commander, 93 Le Cateau Battery RA, 1964 to 1966
    37 HOWITZER BATTERY, ROYAL FIELD ARTILLERY - AUGUST 1914 by Lieutenant Colonel Mike Watson, Section Commander, 93 Le Cateau Battery RA, 1964 to 1966. INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction. [It is alleged that, on Wednesday 19 August 1914, the German Emperor, Kaiser Wilhelm II, ordered the German Army to walk all over the contemptible little British Army. Therefore, those members of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), who served in France, between 4 August 1914 and 22 November 1914, became renown as “The Old Contemptibles”. From 1924 until its disbandment in 1974, the Old Contemptibles Association was a highly respected British institution.] In late August 1964, 93 Le Cateau Battery, Royal Artillery (RA) of 25 Medium Regiment RA marched into Le Cateau led by their Battery Commander (BC), Major Bill Bayly to be presented with the Freedom of the Town. This was one of the very few Old Contemptibles 50th Anniversary events held in France that year. 2. Aim. The aim of this paper is to give an insight into the actions of 37 Howitzer Battery, Royal Field Artillery (RFA), now 93 Le Cateau Battery RA, when it fought at Le Cateau on Wednesday 26 August 1914, as related by some of the veterans of 37 Howitzer Battery and XV Field Brigade RFA at Le Cateau during August 1964. 3. Limitation. This paper is primarily written as a colloquial, rather than an academic, history for the benefit of the recently reactivated 93 Le Cateau Battery RA of 5 Regiment RA. Its main source is the “Martin Gale” pamphlet – further details at Para 58 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Service of 147Th Field Artillery in France to 11Th November
    p - Hilton M. Briggs Library South Dakota State University RECORD OF SERVICE OF -- 147th. t FIELD ARTILLERY I J In France '. To 11th November 1918 , PETER NORBECK, Governor, South Dakota W. A. MORRIS, Adjutant General, South Dakota HQ. 147TH F. A. 1 JANUARY 1919. MEMORANDUM Sketch Showing Manner in Which the 147th F. A., 66th F. A. Brig., 41st Div., Was Organized ·a Oct. 1917 After Arrival 4th S. Dak. Inf. at Camp Greene, Charlotte, N. C., on 2 Oct 1917. Pursuant to verbal order, Commanding General, 41st Division, 3 October, 1917, the 4th S. Dak. Inf·antry was df.sorganized and new units formed as indicated. Field and Stat! _________ Field a.nd Sta!! "All State V~a.d.)uartera Co1;,pany _________ -readguartera Co anton• . ~~l~lX Com~any _ ________,_~C~JlL. ote.te ,,.(/ Company A " ; / Bat ter_y A 1 "Pierre• -....... , .,, 1 "Portiand"- - ~or,rp~i____ ,_,..: ,., 9atterLJL_._ Sioux Fa~le" --'-<. .'" ', 11 "Portl:i.nd" - 147th F. A. Company C ---··- -~--'.:.::,, ~7t~Battery C -) u. s. "Brookings" :::: :: ~ _ ~..,. r - A r m y. ) Con.ps.ny D . '... -1':.....,_ Battery 0 • 11 Pa.rker" ------ - _ ' 1' ---- Company E__ - -,'f:: ..::-,.,.Battary_ E & 4th "Howard Webster"~ 11 ----- S.De.k. (­ .Q_q__~ny F _ ', 1 1 Battery F In!, - "Uitohell" ---..,, '-,,/ .., ,;' . N. G. COrQl2ill:!x_Q_ ____ ___ , ,i..,..,- / Uedical Det. _ "Redfield" -- ... '>-1'r::., / / - ~...P~.!1I..l!11 ---··--·- __ ,, ;:- ... '~ / ( Lead 11 : '::;~,-l116th Su-rply ~an.Y._I 1 / / , , _ l 1 -"Rapid City" ~, !/. 1 / 1 T r a 1 n, K 1 ._/ / 1 Company 1 "Lemmon 11 -- - - -- f.,,:.
    [Show full text]