The Integrated Training Area Management (ITAM) Regional Support Center (RSC) Program.

The must be ready to perform at the highest level in a variety of environments. Army training is designed to challenge soldiers, leaders, and units alike. The Army relies on land to achieve its training and testing objectives and maintain force readiness. In this day and age, the Army has faced unparalleled threats to its ability to train. Increased environmental regulations and the encroachment of the public sector onto installations have made the management of training lands a fine and exact science. A happy medium must be found between the interests of environmentalists, the public and Army personnel wishing to provide the best training for our troops in a fiscally responsible manner. The Army Integrated Training Area Management (ITAM) program deals with issues regarding the prudent management of training and testing lands. The goals of the ITAM program include the following:

• Achieve optimal sustained use of lands for the execution of realistic training, by providing a sustainable core capability, which balances usage, condition, and level of maintenance • Implement a management and decision-making process, which integrates Army training and other mission requirements for land use with sound natural and cultural resources management • Advocate proactive conservation and land management p • Align Army training land management priorities with the Army training, testing, and readiness priorities.

A popular medium in trying to display management practices and stewardship techniques on Army installations is through the use of maps. One component of the ITAM program is the use of GIS (Geographic Information Systems). GIS is used to provide solutions or answer questions where a spatial component is involved. The Army ITAM GIS Program supports the Army’s integrated land use planning strategy for the management of training lands to ensure mission requirements are supported while environmental administration objectives are achieved. A major component of the ITAM GIS program is the Regional Support Center, which provides data, analysis and technical support to Army installations across the world. At the current time, the ITAM program ITAM GIS SUPPORT supports two Regional Support CALIBRE ITAM TEAM Centers. The Western Regional Support Center (WRSC) is located

CEMML – CSU CALIBRE at the Center for the Environmental Fort Collins, CO Springfield, VA Management of Military Lands (CEMML) Office at Colorado State RSC Technical Coordinators University in Fort Collins, WRSC ERSC Gary Senseman & Calvin Bagley Colorado. The Eastern Regional Support Center (ERSC) is located RSC GIS Manager RSC GIS Manager on the grounds of Fort A.P. Hill in Kelly Elverum Database/Web Jason Walters Administration Bowling Green, . The GIS Analyst GIS Analyst Bill Sprouse & GIS Analyst GIS Analyst Lisa Kennaway Mike O’Donnell Jocelyn Wilson Rob Maple Amy Zech ERSC is run by CALIBRE, an

GIS Analyst GIS Analyst GIS Analyst GIS Analyst information technology and Sunny Penhollow Amanda Bower Training Tim Mulrooney New Hire Administration management services firm located GIS Analyst GIS Analyst GIS Technician Holly Taylor Doug Willets Julie Oscarson New Hire in Alexandria, Virginia. The United States Army Environmental Center ITAM GIS Program Overview and RSC Support 30 [email protected] (USAEC) located at Aberdeen Figure 1: Regional Support Center Infrastructure Proving Ground, Maryland, maintains oversight of the two RSCs through CALIBRE. The entire RSC infrastructure is shown in Figure 1.

1 The primary goal of the RSC is to provide GIS support and capabilities to the 75 or so Army ITAM installations and complexes across the United States, Europe, Asia and Puerto Rico. This support can take on a number of forms depending upon the level of support category that each falls into. Larger Army Installations such as Fort Benning, which already have a GIS Specialist on site, receive partial support. The RSC provided GIS technical support, or hotline support, for these installations. The RSC and RSC personnel work directly with installation personnel on spatial analyses and hardware/software support. RSC personnel work with ITAM coordinators, environmental managers, range mangers and other GIS personnel on site. Approximately 35 installations fall into this category. The other 40 installations that the RSC supports are classified as full support installations. These are smaller installations that do not have the need or financial resources for a full-time GIS specialist. The RSC is utilized for data creation, retrieval, support and analysis. The end product of this is often times delivery in the form of digital data and paper maps. In essence, the RSC acts as the GIS specialists for these installations, albeit from a central location in Fort Collins or Fort A.P. Hill. This allows the RSC staff to consult with a number of GIS and environmental experts while easily accessing and querying the plethora of data at their disposal. Being a regional support center, the RSC staff keeps in close contact with anyone that may have interest or experience in the GIS operations at these supported installations. They deal with state GIS managers, Range Control, ITAM coordinators, planning department heads and anyone else familiar with GIS technology and how it can impact their Army installation. Often times the RSC staff will arrange personal site visits with these individuals for the sake of data creation, coordination, QA/QC (Quality Assurance / Quality Control) and the update of existing layers.

Partially Supported Installations Fully Supported Installations

Camp Gruber, OK - Aberdeen PG, MD Camp Gruber - OK ARNG Schweinfurt, Germany OK ARNG Korea Area I (North) Camp Guernsey, WY Korea Area II White Sands MR, NM Camp Ripley - MN ARNG Wuerzburg, Germany - WY ARNG (Northwest) Korea Area III ( Yuma PG, AZ Orchard TA - ID ARNG Camp Crowder, MO Camp Parks, CA Central) Dugway PG, UT Camp Roberts - CA ARNG Harrison, MT – MT Camp San Louis Obispo - CA Devens RFTA, MA ARNG Korea Area IV (South) , NC ARNG Kansas Regional Training Center, KS - Aschaffenburg, Fort Drum, NY Fort Jackson, SC Marseilles, IL KS ARNG Germany Roswell WETS, NM - Fort Polk, LA Fort Rucker, AL Ravenna, OH NM ARNG Butzbach, Germany Ashland, NE – NE Fort Stewart, GA Fort Benning, GA Wendell Ford RTC, KY ARNG Fort Dix, NJ Biak Training Center, Fort Campbell, KY Fort Knox, KY Camp McCain, MS OR - OR ARNG Macon, MO Camp Stead, NV - Fort Carson, CO Fort Leonard Wood, MO Ansbach, Germany NV ARNG Fort Custer, MI Florence Military Camp Grayling - MI ARNG Fort Huachuca, AZ Reservation, AZ - AZ McClellan (Pelham Fort Hood, TX Fort Bliss, TX Bamberg, Germany ARNG Range), AL Fort Hunter Liggett, Fort Irwin, CA Fort Sill, OK Tullahoma, TN CA Milan, TN Camel Tracks, NM - Yakima TC, WA Fort McCoy, WI Ethan Allen, VT NM ARNG Clark, MO Limestone Hills, MT - Fort Lewis, WA Grafenwoehr, Germany Camp Butner, NC MT ARNG Camp Dawson, WV Camp Grafton, ND - Fort Riley, KS Hohenfels, Germany Riley / Bog Brook, ME ND ARNG Caswell / Loring, ME Stones Ranch Military Camp Rilea, OR - Fort A.P. Hill, VA Fort Richardson, Alaska Reservation, CT OR ARNG , VA Fort Sam Houston, TX Fort Greely, Alaska Camp Wismer, WI - BG Thomas Baker Fort McClellan, AL (Pellham Camp Santiago, PR WI ARNG Training Site, MD Range) - AL ARNG Fort Wainwright, Alaska Camp Dodge, IA - IA Friedberg, Germany ARNG Wappapello, MO Camp Shelby - MS ARNG Dillingham, Oahu, Hawaii Hastings, NE – NE Camp Smith, NY ARNG Camp Minden, LA Fort Chaffee - AR ARNG Kahuka, Oahu, Hawaii Camp Navajo, AZ - Catoosa, TN AZ ARNG Fort Pickett - VA ARNG Kawailoa, Oahu, Hawaii Makua Maneuver Area, Oahu, Camp Atterbury - IN ARNG Hawaii

Camp Blanding - FL ARNG Pohakuloa, Hawaii, Hawaii Schofield West Schofield Barracks East Range, Oahu, Hawaii Range, Oahu, Hawaii

Table 1: List of Fully and Partially Supported ITAM Installations Supported by the RSC

2 Besides the technical support that the RSC provides for installations, the RSC provides data development for supported and other military installations across the world. The RSC can be tasked with a number of data development duties, such as GPS data collection, the processing of remotely sensed imagery, digitization, attribution of data layers, field data collection and scanning. The RSC takes a proactive role in data development. Most data development revolves around the required ITAM GIS layers such as roads, training areas, live fire ranges and rivers. The RSC may develop other layers that may have some computational value at the request of the installation. Nonetheless, all data developed or edited by the RSC are standardized in accordance to FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee) standards, internal SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures), and parameters set forth by the USAEC. The RSC has started to convert existing data to SDSFIE (Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure and Environment)-compliant geo-databases. GIS data are very dynamic entities, often enduring numerous edits, updates, and revisions. As a result, the RSC must follow up data development with a robust GIS data support system. The RSC maintains a large database of GIS data and imagery collected from data development tasks. Whenever any data are created or edits are performed, the accompanying metadata is edited accordingly. It is necessary that all users and future stewards of this information be kept up to date on all modifications of each and every data layer. Having these data at a central location is paramount to the easy update, editing and dissemination of these data. Any of the RSC staff can easily access the data from any installation to accommodate interested parties in an expeditious and efficient manner. In support of data development tasks, the hardware and software used to run and house GIS data must run in an efficient manner. In addition, RSC staff must keep all installations and the USAEC appraised of all activities and how they relate to our primary goal of supporting our nation’s Army. RSC staff must be knowledgeable in all GIS technologies in order to communicate with people of varying GIS backgrounds. The RSC staff must also be conversant in the hardware and software applications that keep an entire GIS running and operational. The RSC staff often serves as the first line of questioning when installation staff encounters problems with ancillary issues such as GPS hardware and configuration, software installation and import/export techniques. As a result, RSC staff provides support in the following areas. • Database Maintenance • Data Analysis • Data Display • Data Output • GIS / GPS System Configuration and Maintenance • MAGIC Support and Updates • GIS Data Updating and Editing • GIS Data Archive • GIS Metadata Archive • Monthly Reports to AEC and Installations POC

Our nation’s Army is being supported by GIS technologies and applications created by some of this country’s best and brightest people. The RSC helps to develop and test these new technologies before they are released for use in the field. One facet of the ITAM program is ATTACC (Army Training and Testing Area Carrying Capacity) Methodology. RSC staff have been working with ATTACC to develop their LCM (Land Condition Module), a GIS-based application that models surface erosion and land condition as a product of both training and environmental factors. The RSC has been tasked with testing the newest version of an ArcGIS extension that creates surface danger zones (SDZs) based on weapon type, munitions and firing medium. This ArcGIS extension is scheduled for release in mid-August, 2003. The RSC has also had a hand in the new fielding of RFMSS (Range Facility Management Support System) by providing necessary data layers for selected United States Marine Corps installations throughout the United States and Asia. The RSC has provided support for endeavors in the LCTA (Land Condition Trend Analysis), LRAM (Land Rehabilitation and Maintenance), and TRI (Training Requirement Integration) programs.

3 The RSC provides support for HQDA/MACOM projects when opportunities present themselves. Recent work done in these HQDA ventures include:

Data Modeling to Support POM Build Installation Training Capacity Support Active/Inactive Range Inventory Data Repository Custom Maps & Reports Tracking GIS Assets

While GIS personnel can appreciate the value of data, software and technical support, SLOPE GUIDE the layperson expects the output of most GIS projects to be in the form of maps. The maps that the RSC create cover a wide PERCENTAGE DEGREE 15% 8.5º gamut of concepts. They include SDZ maps, range and

14% 8º impacts maps and environmental overlays. At the current time, the RSC has been tasked with the creation of MIMs (Military 13% 7.4º Installation Maps) for all fully supported installations. A sample 12% 6.8º MIM is shown in Appendix B. In order to make map creation

11% 6.3º easier through a standard process, the RSC has created and

10% 5.7º used margin tools to make and place standard elements onto the map template in ArcGIS. In addition to the tradition margin 9% 5.1º tools included in the essential elements of map design (scale 8% 4.6º bar, legend, generic north arrow), a MIM includes margin 7% 4º elements that can be useful out in the field. These elements

6% 3.4º include a magnetic north arrow routinely updated with changes in the earth’s magnetic field, a slope guide (left), and 5% 2.9º customized scale bar. In the creation of a MIM, it is necessary AB C AB - HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTOURS for ancillary information to be displayed in addition these new AC - HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN INDEX CONTOURS graphical elements added to the map template. Using these Figure 2: Slope Guide margin tools, a map reference, citation information dialog and disclaimer can be created and customized for each installation. These tools can be easily loaded as forms and run in the VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) environment as part of ArcMap’s Macro editor. Another component of the valuable mapping tools that the RSC has helped develop and use in the course of map creation is the ITAM style set. The ITAM style set gives map makers additional flexibility by allowing them to use a universal set of symbols to be used with range related features on all ITAM maps. This allows for training related symbols not normally offered in the normal lexicon of the ERSI symbols. At the current time, the ITAM style set accommodates line, fill and marker symbols. In addition, a user is able to create a MGRS Figure 3: Examples of ITAM (Military Grid Reference System) 1,000 meter Polygon Symbology grid to be superimposed on the map. An explanation of MGRS grid use is created using the aforementioned margin tools. The Regional Support Centers work as a cohesive unit to provide range managers, GIS specialists and environmental personnel with the best possible advice and solutions to best serve the men and women training to protect this nation. The structure and function of the RSC provides exhaustive reporting to the Government while ensuring that redundancies in data creation are not done among agencies. RSC staff is involved in all facets of map creation; therefore, they must knowledgeable in all GIS processes, techniques and technologies. As a result, the RSC is a collection of dynamic individuals who serve as the stewards to the Army’s data. They are able to access and analyze these data with little notice, whether working on long terms tasks or serving the Army in prompt and competent manner.

4

W R S C

E R S C

Appendix A: Location of ITAM Sites and Regional Support Centers

5

LEJMIM-1-50K-1 1:50,000 NAD 83/WGS 84 DRAFT CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY INSTALLATION MAP DRAFT CAMP LEJEUNE MILITARY INSTALLATION MAP 260 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 270 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 280 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 290 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 300 01 02 03 04 05 06 77° 37' 50.18" W 77° 64' 42.98" W

34° 45' 10.78" N 2 34° 45' 47.09" N 30 0 0 1 1 30 10 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 30 0 1 2 3 30 0 0 30 30 10 2 30 3 0 3 0

0

20 48 20 48 48 48 0 20 2

1 0 2 0 0 2 10 2 0 0 2

2 0 1 0 0

0 3 1 20 20

0 30 3 0

0 3 3

2 20 20 10 0 0 30 3 20 47 0 47 AB 47 47 AA 30 0 10 3 20 3 0 AD 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 0 0

20 2 2 20 1 0

0 46 46 20 10 46 46 0 30 0 1 2 3 0 0 30 0 20 2 AC 30

0

2 2 0

0 2

1 0

0 2

1 0 20 30 2 45 3 45 30 45 45 0 0 10 20 10 10

0 20 3 10 30 CA 30 30 0 BC 3

0

3 30 2 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 20 44 44 30 44 44 20 30 0 3 3 20 0

0

20 0 0

2

10 3 1

0

1 0

1 0 0 1 3 30 30 20 3 RA 0 0 2

2 0 30 3

0 0

1 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 0 F5 43 0 43 1 CB 43 43 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 RB 2 20 3 20 0

3 0 0 0 2

1 3 1 0 2 0 10 20 0 20 0 3 BD 20 1 0 10 2 FB 0 0 3 0 1 FA 0

3 DA 0 01 2 42 42 42 0 3 42

0

1 30

0 0

3 2 0 2 1 0 0 30

0 3 QA 3

20 0

3

0

0 2 0

3 1 2 20 0 2 0 0

MA 3 3

0 0 10 30 3

0

1 0

0 0 3

2 1 10 30 02 41 41 2 41 41 30 WDZ MORGAN BAY 0 DB

DE 0 2 FE 30 1 2 0 0 0 03

1

0 0

0 FF 2 0 1 2 0

1

1 1 0 0 20 0 MC 0 2 1 20 0

0

3 0 3 0 30 20 0 38 2 38 0 3 40 MB 40 3 40 QB 0 40 SA 3 10 20 0 0 3 3 3 SB 0 DF DE 30 FG 10 0 20 0

3 2 0 0 SC 20 3 10 0 30 1 20 2 0 0 0 1 0 39 3 39 KA 39 39 20 10

3 30 0 10 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 10 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93FC 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 0 04 05 0 06 0 SE 20 3 0 20 0 0 MD 3 2 10 2 0 0 0 2 30 3 10 10 0 38 38 KC DD 38 30 38 0 3 FD 20 0 04 2 0

0 OP-2

3 3 1 0 0 10 0 1 3 3 0 0 30 3 3 0 0 20 GB2 20 OP-3 SF ME 20 KB 10 4 GC 37 37 37 05 0 37 3 0 30 3 20

SD 30 1 OP-9 3 0 5 1 34 0 06 10 30 0 2 10 0 0 KD 2 3 0 3 0

2 0 0 0 2 DC 3 OP-4 0 30 3 GE MF 20 20 36 0 36 WDZ FARNELL BAY 36 36 3 0 30 2

0 OP-7 0

SG 1 1 0 10 20 0 0 0

1 2 0 0 30 1 3 20 2 Field Ammo 30 0 G-10 IMPACT AREA 10 0 0 07 0 Storage Area 1 0 6 0 2 35 0 35 0 35 35 3 30 09 2 2 0 08 GI 0 0

1 0 10

2

SJ 0 K-2 IMPACT AREA 0 0 OP-5 1 2

30 0 SH 2 3 10 0 0 HD Bear Tower 1 0 0 1 0 LE LF 7 0 10 10 34 L 34 34 34

0 1 0 20 0 2 23 20

0 10 30 SI 3 10 1 HH 0 0 0 0 2 1 0

20 20 20 HA 2 33 0 HE 33 33 20 33 30 0 1 30 GD 1 0 0 30 3 28 10 0 0 3 GA 3

0 20 1 OP-6 0 LA 2 0 2 3 0 1 10

0 10 0 3 29 20 32 32 32 20 32 11

3 8 0 HC GF SK GH 10

2

0

2 HG 3 0 0 1 L5 0 HB 0 2 0 LB 30 24 1 30 SM LHA Deck 0 21 0 Hathcott Sniper Range 0 G 31 W31DZ 33 3 31 31 0 1 20 1 JA 30 0

0 1 2 0 25 HF 0 10 0 16 10 2 JB 10 31 20 30 0 30 2 32 20 0 30 2 10 10 10 38 0 38 30 LG 30 1 IE 30 30 1 20 12 0 JD JC

0 SL LD 1 GG 2 0 0 30 2 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 SN 20 3 14

0

2 IA 10 20 29 0 29 26 3 17 29 29 LC 3 0 North Onslow Beach 3 0 0 3 2 0

0 1 30 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 1 27 13 SO 0 30 20 10 IB 15 0 28 28 20 28 28 30 0 10 3 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 20 10 IF 0

1 10

2

10 0 0 1 2 0 IC 18 10 IG 27 27 10 20 10 27 27 30 30

0

0 0 3 3 SQ SP 2 19 30

20 0 30 1 SR 20 0 22B N-1/BT-3 IMPACT AREA 26 3 26 22A 26 WDZ GATOR 26 0 EE SW 0

0 30 30 3 30 South Onslow Beach 1 0 ID 20

0 10 25 25 2 25 1 25 0 0

0 2 0

3

2

30

10 SU 30 30

0 0 0 1 24 24 3 24 ID 24 ST 2 30

0

1

0 0 3 1

0 20 1 0 0 SV 3 3 0 30

23 10 23 23 23 20

0

3

0 2 20

0 1 20 30

30 30

2 22 0 22 30 22 0 WDZ SHARK 22

0

3

3

0 0 0 30 2 10

3

0

21 0 21 21 21

3

1

0

0

1

0

2 0 3

0

2

1

0

3820 30 20 20 3820 30 0

20

20 0

0 19 20 19 19 19

30

0

3 20 10 20 30 30 N .

0m 0 18 18 18 00 1 1 0 0 0 0 18 0 38 10 1 20 30 0 30 2 20

0 0 20 1 3 0 0 30 34° 28' 2.27" N 2 34° 28' 38.42" N 77° 37' 17.51" W 77° 6' 16.96" W 260000m.E 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 270 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 280 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 290 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 300 01 02 03 04 05 06 GN Elevation Guide 1:50,000 2 2 2 MILITARY LEGEND LEGEND SLOPE GUIDE 70 80 90 BOUNDARIES 1010.5 234Kilometers

k PERCENTAGE DEGREE CONVERSION GRAPH TRAINING AREA LOCATOR 100.5 123Miles 15% 8.5º (1 meter = 3.28 feet) Buildings Hydrography Onslow County Carteret County Installation Boundary MOUT Site Meters Feet Ø 0.5 0 2 Nautical Miles 14% 8º A . . . 7946 B . . . 7343 200 38 38 ! ! ! ! 40 40 ! Roads Permanent Stream ! Range Fan ! Training Area Sub Section C . . . 8343 D . . . 8441 ! 600 GRID CONVERGENCE 13% 7.4º H Primary Intermittent Water Body E . . . 8926 F . . . 9140 1º20' (23.5 MILS) Sample 1,000 Meter Square Area 100 Meter Reference Landing Zones ELEVATIONS IN FEET 12% 6.8º Primary Impact Area FOR CENTER OF SHEET 1. Read the large numbers labeling the VERTICAL grid line 500 G . . . 9232 H . . . 8732 46 left of the point and estimate the tenths (100 meters) from High Secondary E Sample CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET ! OP Observation Points Permanent Water Body the grid line to the point. 12 2 11% 6.3º Secondary Impact Area I . . . 8728 J . . . 8130 point

2. Read the large numbers labeling the HORIZONTAL grid 400

7 A.

7 Tertiary ! !! !! !!! !! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! ! 7 7 7 7 7 7

7 K . . . 7938 L . . . 7433 1995 line below the point and estimate the tenths (100 meters) SPHEROID GRS80 10% 5.7º 7 & 7 7 7 ! Artillery Firing Point Vegetation G-M ANGLE 45 from the grid line to the point. 45 8 Medium 7 12 !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! ! 100 77 77 77 77Special Use Airspace ! ! ! 13 Example: 122458 GRID 1000 METER UTM ZONE 18 Q ! ! M . . . 7537 Q . . . 9340 ! ! 300 A. Pender County 7 ! Tank Trails 7.5º (130 MILS) 9% 5.1º PROJECTION !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! !! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! ! TRANSVERSE MERCATOR N M Mortar Firing Point Forested R . . . 8742 S . . . 6730 100,000 M. Square Identification When reporting outside the 100,000 meter square area . ( !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! CENTRAL MERIDIAN 75º W LONGITUDE 0m Water Drop Zones in which the point lies, prefix the 100,000 meter square 8% 4.6º 3830 Low Topography identification. 200 00 LA TITUDE OF ORIGIN ! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !!0º LATITUDE Swamp/Wetland Example: TD123456 NAD 83/WGS 84

TD UD 30

! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! !! 7% 4º

VERTICAL DATUM 1929 NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 38 Ammo Supply Area 00 Index Contour 100 NOTES HORIZONTAL DATUM ! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! ! 1983 NORTH AME RICAN DATUM DISCLAIMER: 6% 3.4º This map was produced by the Regional Support Centers (RSC). Although Non-Index Contour Grid Zone Designation When reporting ouside the grid zone desgination area CONTROL BY !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !!! !! !! !! !! !!! ! US GEOLOGIC SURVEY THE BOUNDARY FOR CAMP in which the point lies, prefix the grid zone desginator. proper GIS data development procedures have been followed in accordance TO CONVERT A ! !! !! !! !! !!! !!! !! !! !! !! !! !! TO CONVERT A 18S Example: 18STD123456 PREPARED BY ITAM GIS REGIONAL SUPPORT CENTER 5% 2.9º 0 0 with Federal and industry standards, we make no guarantees or warranties, LEJEUNE SHOULD NOT BE GRID AZIMUTH TO A MAGNETIC AZIMUTH either expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy of any information CONSIDERED AUTHORITATIVE. MAGNETIC AZIMUTH TO A GRID AZIMUTH AB C contained or any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, ADD G-M ANGLE SUBTRACT G-M ANGLE AB - HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN CONTOURS the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The AC - HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN INDEX CONTOURS burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. ZONE 18 270000m.E 280 290

6

Appendix B: Sample MIM (Military Installation Map)

7