(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0025680 A1 Jebsen Et Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0025680 A1 Jebsen Et Al US 2004.0025680A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0025680 A1 Jebsen et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 12, 2004 (54) FIREARM WITH ENHANCED RECOIL AND (30) Foreign Application Priority Data CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Jun. 7, 2002 (CH).............................................. 0975/02 (76) Inventors: Jan Henrik Jebsen, Nyon (CH); Jul. 31, 2002 (CH).............................................. 1343/02 Renaud Kerbrat, Nyon (CH); Klaus Apr. 15, 2003 (CH).............................................. 0679/03 Jenny, Nyon (CH) Publication Classification Correspondence Address: WILEY, REIN & FIELDING, LLP (51) Int. Cl." - F41F 1700 ATTN: PATENT ADMINISTRATION (52) U.S. Cl. ................................................................ 89/199 1776 K. STREET N.W. WASHINGTON, DC 20006 (US) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 10/454,780 The invention comprises an improved recoil control device comprising a bolt head and an inertia block or slider for use (22) Filed: Jun. 5, 2003 in a variety of firearms. In one embodiment, the bolt head and inertia block are articulated So that the displacement of the bolt head results in a force component outside the firing Related U.S. Application Data axis of the barrel of the firearm. The device can be incor porated into firearms of a variety of sizes and configurations (60) Provisional application No. 60/459,969, filed on Apr. to produce recoil reduction and/or weight reduction advan 4, 2003. tageS. AAA. As R. R. S. Nassa Aww.nasa Yawyy-Ala-Saws a ZaaZZ Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 1 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 sex SAS sesse-NA,Zaaaay a.9. - - -A - - - - - - - - YS A. FIG. 1 Sox SS-Xxxx Y S. r Reza OlsZX == in, N.&Z FIG. 2 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 2 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 N N y Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 3 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 : Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 4 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 : Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 5 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 S. y Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 6 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 s 2 s N s 8 C. -Hi 3- Y - i-A) 8 T s it S Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 7 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 s s 3 CO O L Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 8 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 103 108 P103 P102 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 9 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 10 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 11 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 12 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 13 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 14 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 23 33 141 28 30 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 15 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 16 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 17 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 18 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 Patent Application Publication Feb. 12, 2004 Sheet 19 of 19 US 2004/0025680 A1 FIG. 32 US 2004/0025680 A1 Feb. 12, 2004 FIREARM WITH ENHANCED RECOIL AND breech to the barrel, until the gas pressure falls to a safe level CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS once the projectile has exited the barrel. The main breech locking Systems developed employed Separate revolving RELATED APPLICATIONS chambers, the rotation of which provides an adequate dura tion of protection, or toggle Systems, rotating bolts, tilting 0001. This application claims priority benefit to U.S. breech blocks, lug Systems, or even non-ramming breech Provisional Application No. 60/459,969, filed Apr. 4, 2003, blocks. A common but unsatisfactory feature among all which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This these mechanisms is that they do not prevent the undesirable application also claims priority to Swiss Application No. Side effects during automatic firing, which accounts for the 0975/02, filed Jun. 7, 2002, Swiss Application No. 1343/02, adverse effects on accuracy and ease of use. filed Jul. 31, 2002, and Swiss Application No. 0679/03, filed Apr. 15, 2003, which are incorporated herein by reference in 0005 Thus, the mechanisms found on current firearms, their entirety. although reliable and widely employed, nevertheless Suffer from a number of deficiencies. For example, Some mecha FIELD OF INVENTION nisms increase the length of the housing of the breech, resulting in interior clutter and increased weight. The ampli 0002 This invention relates to small and heavy caliber tude of recoil is relatively critical due to its effect on firearms and cannons as well as to improved methods and accuracy, and the existing mechanisms fail to provide a devices for reducing the consequences of recoil and improv Satisfactory or optimum reduction in recoil, which permits ing performance in firearms and cannons. In a particular the resulting upward movement of the barrel. More particu embodiment, the device relates to the control or manage larly, the direction of the recoil forces generally coincides ment of the recoil forces for Small caliber Semiautomatic or with the longitudinal axis of the gun barrel. The gun barrel automatic firearms. is generally located above the shoulder in a perSon firing a rifle or above the hand in a handgun, and more precisely BACKGROUND FOR AND INTRODUCTION TO above the gap between the thumb and index finger of a THE INVENTION person firing a handgun. This configuration generates a moment that causes the upward jerking of the gun familiar 0003. Historically, automatic weapons were intended to to every user. Heavy caliber firearms and cannons experi be loaded mechanically and, therefore, fired much faster ence the Same upward forces upon firing. For these and other than hand-loaded firearms. However, the rapid firing of reasons, improvements in the design and operation of Small Successive cartridges induces various Side effects that proved detrimental both to accuracy and the effectiveness of and heavy caliber firearms and cannons are desired in the art. an automatic weapon. Traditionally, a gun was considered to 0006 The innovative approaches taken here make a more work like a heat engine, in which about thirty percent of the effective use of the available energy and, in particular, energy developed by the propellant powder is dissipated as recycle, as much as practicable, the wasted energy by heat, forty percent as muzzle blast and recoil, and only the departing from the traditional and historical mechanisms. In remaining thirty percent was effectively used to propel the one aspect, this invention provides new Solutions, mecha bullet out of the barrel. Successive designs of automatic nisms, and Systems for operating the firing action of a weapons tried to make use of the vast amount of wasted firearm and allows revolutionary changes in the ergonomics energy to help make the automatic cycling operate better. applicable to firearm design and use. Three general Systems were used. Hiram Maxim was the 0007 Taking into account all these adverse or secondary first to use recoil forces to mechanize the ejection and effects that impede the use of all firearms, and in particular loading actions in a machine gun, Browning put the muzzle automatic firearms, in which energy is essentially wasted blast to effective use, and Bergman devised the Simple beyond that necessary for propelling the projectile, the blowback action. Thus, the three basic ways of obtaining an present approach is new and innovative. In general and in automatic operation were developed from the use of recoil, one aspect, the invention is aimed at addressing the design gas, or blowback actuation. Later applications of the blow of a new firearm by taking advantage of available energy to back operation used either simple blowback or assisted help operate the firearm and consequently minimize and/or blowback, with or without locked, delayed, hesitation or compensate for the adverse effects and improve control. A retarded blowback, and even blowback with advance primer first innovation is the deliberate use and control of energy to ignition. Gas operation leads to the use of long and short address all the adverse effects during operation. This allows Stroke pistons and even, in more modern weapons, direct gas one to conceive of a new firearm design and organization, action, where the derived gas directly activates a bolt carrier Still dependable, but vastly improved. This new approach in which an adequate receSS is managed. Recoil operation also allows a firearm designer to address concerns and traditionally provided the locking mechanism of the bolt to constraints as part of a whole rather than as individual the barrel so that they can slide together under the thrust of problems, So as to take into account the advantages and the pressure when firing, either under a short or long recoil interfaces between firearm components during operation. operation and with or without muzzle boosters or recoil Considering the operation as a whole, as this invention intensifiers. exemplifies, allows completely new concepts and expands 0004 Throughout the time these improvements were the universe of designs, configurations, and mechanisms made a main issue was Safety. Depending on the design, possible for firearms. operators were Susceptible to explosive forces from an improperly chambered round or an incomplete breech lock SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION on the chambered round. Therefore, all Systems were engi 0008. The present invention addresses the problems and neered in order to Secure an accurate locking duration for the disadvantages associated with conventional firearms and US 2004/0025680 A1 Feb.
Recommended publications
  • STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Revision 10.0
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES Revision 10.0 Effective: November 10, 2020 Contents GTGC ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 GTGC BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ............................................................................................................................................. 2 GTGC CHIEF RANGE SAFETY OFFICERS: ............................................................................................................................... 2 CLUB PHYSICAL ADDRESS: ................................................................................................................................................... 2 CLUB MAILING ADDRESS: .................................................................................................................................................... 2 CLUB CONTACT PHONE NUMBER ....................................................................................................................................... 2 CLUB EMAIL ADDRESS: ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 CLUB WEB SITE: ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 HOURS OF OPERATION ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,477,801 B1 O'dwyer (45) Date of Patent: *Nov
    USOO6477801B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,477,801 B1 O'dwyer (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 12, 2002 (54) FIREARMS SECURITY 4970,819 A 11/1990 Mayhak ..................... 42/70.11 5,062.232 A 11/1991 Eppler ....................... 42/70.11 (75) Inventor: James Michael O’dwyer, Brisbane 5,123,193 A 6/1992 Pugh ........... ... 42/70.11 (AU) 5,303,495 A * 4/1994 Hartcock ..... ... 42/70.11 5,461812 A 10/1995 Bennett ..................... 42/70.11 (73) Assignee: Metal Storm Limited, Brisbane (AU) 5,502.915 A 4/1996 Mendelsohn et al. ...... 42/70.11 5,570,528 A 11/1996 Teetzel ...................... 42/70.11 (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros 5,603,179 A 2/1997 Adams ...................... 42/70.08 ecution application filed under 37 CFR 5,883,329 A 3/1999 O’dwyer ..................... 102/217 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year 5,915.936 A * 6/1999 Brentzel .................... 42/70.11 patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2). FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this RU 94O17593 4/1996 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 RU 2O72O72 1/1997 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO WO 94/20809 9/1994 (21) Appl. No.: 09/445,024 (22) PCT Filed: Jun. 2, 1998 * cited by examiner (86) PCT No.: PCT/AU98/00413 Primary Examiner J. Woodrow Eldred S371 (c)(1), (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, (2), (4) Date: Dec. 3, 1999 Maier & Neustadt, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2S R. Sz %Azzzzzzzzzzzzzz 2Ssssssssss2
    US005625972A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,625,972 King et al. 45 Date of Patent: May 6, 1997 54 GUN WITH ELECTRICALLY FIRED 4,771,692 9/1988 Ninio et al.. CARTRIDGE 4,881,463 11/1989 Ninio et al.. 5,115,743 5/1992 Loffler ..................................... 102,472 5,233,902 8/1993 Bernardes. 76) Inventors: Albert I. King, 1000 Bretton La., 5235,127 8/1993 Findley. Bloomfield Hills, Mich. 48304-2910; 5,263,416 11/1993 Amundson et al.. Mark P. Libich, 8180 N. Canton 5,272,828 12/1993 Petricket al. Center Rd., Canton, Mich. 48187 5,285,727 2/1994 Reams, Jr. et al.. 5,450,686 9/1995 La Mura et al. ........................... 42/84 21 Appl. No.: 521,865 5,469,790 1 1/1995 Singer ................ 5,515,783 5/1996 Hesse et al. ............................ 102,472 22 Filed: Aug. 31, 1995 (51 Int. Cl. ........... F41A 19158; F42B5/08 Primary Examiner Michael J. Carone 52 U.S. Cl. ................................ 42/84; 89/135; 89/28.05; Assistant Examiner. Theresa M. Wesson 102/472 Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Brooks & Kushman P.C. 58) Field of Search ................................. 42/84; 89/135, 57 ABSTRACT 89/28.05: 102/472, 206, 200 Agun is provided with an electronically fired cartridge. The 56) References Cited cartridge includes a primer cap with a heat sensitive primer therein. A fuse wire of appropriate electrical resistance U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS extends through the primer, and a pair of contacts are affixed 2.931,039 4/1960 Henning et al. ....................... 89/28.05 with a gun to provide a voltage to the fuse wire in order to 3.269,315 8/1966 Gauld.
    [Show full text]
  • H VAS E 2012 3 Readers' Guide
    Swedish Defence Material Administration´s Weapons and Ammunition Safety Manual Readers' Guide 1. Introduction 2. Safety activities and requirements common to all materiel 3. Weapons 4. Ammunition HVAS E 5. Summary of require- ments/checklist Appendix 1. Definitions Appendix 2. Acronyms Appendix 3. Standards Appendix 4. References Central distribution: Armed Forces' Publications and forms stores (FBF) Print: Elanders Fälth & Hässler, June 2013 READERS' GUIDE H VAS can be read a first time in its entirety and it can then act as a reference guide and as a checklist. This manual comprises both descriptive and requirement-based chapters as described below. Chapter 1, ‘Introduction’ describes the background, precondi- tions and objectives of the manual. Chapter 2, ‘Safety activities and requirements common to all materiel’ specifies weapon and ammunition related safety activi- ties and how they can be conducted in the most suitable manner. Chapter 3, ‘Weapons’ specifies equipment related requirements for weapons of which the main sections are Common require- ments and System requirements. Chapter 4, ‘Ammunition’ specifies equipment related require- ments for ammunition. With regard to ammunition the specific subsystem requirements also apply. These are specified under the respective headings Warheads, Propulsion systems, Fuzing sys- tems and Packaging. Chapter 5, ‘Summary’ of all of the manual’s requirements. Used as a checklist, e.g. when presenting a system to advisory groups. Appendix 1, ‘Definitions’ defines specific terms. Appendix 2, ‘Acronyms’ lists a key to the abbreviations and acro- nyms used in the manual. Appendix 3, ‘Standards’ relates to relevant standards known at the time of the publication of the manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comments on USML Categories I-III
    7/20/2018 DOS-2017-0046-2430.html As of: July 10, 2018 Received: July 06, 2018 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: July 09, 2018 Tracking No. 1k2-944e-n1fc Comments Due: July 09, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: DOS-2017-0046 Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision of U.S. Munitions List Categories I, II, and III Comment On: DOS-2017-0046-0001 International Traffic in Arms Regulations: U.S. Munitions List Categories I, II, and III Document: DOS-2017-0046-2430 Comment on DOS-2017-0046-0001 Submitter Information Name: Aaron Karp Address: BAL 7006 Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA, 23529 Email: [email protected] Phone: 17576835700 General Comment The proposed ITAR revision for firearms and ammunition promises little, and risks much. As an analyst of the global arms trade and weapons proliferation for thirty years, I recognize the transformative power of regulatory reform. But this is something else. The proposed revisions promise short-term benefits, which seem unlikely to amount to much in an already competitive global market. That makes this deregulation for the sake of deregulation itself. Meanwhile, the change unleashes three forces certain to accelerate long turn American industrial decline and loss of influence over global consequences. First, they show that the United States no longer will set global normative standards for all form of arms transfers and non-proliferation. Previously the United States Government has shown it will not further tighten restrictions. As the first outright relaxation of oversight standards in arms exports in over fifty years, the change marks a switch in policy dating from the Kennedy Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Gun Safety Technologies
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice JUNE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE 2013 RESEARCH REPORT A Review of Gun Safety Technologies BY MARK GREENE, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh St. N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General Karol V. Mason Assistant Attorney General Greg Ridgeway Acting Director, National Institute of Justice This and other publications and products of the National Institute of Justice can be found at: National Institute of Justice http://www.nij.gov Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov JUNE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE 2013 RESEARCH REPORT A Review of Gun Safety Technologies BY MARK GREENE, Ph.D. NCJ 242500 RESEARCH REPORT 3 Highlights • Since the mid-1990s, numerous teams have developed firearms with advanced gun safety technology—often called “smart guns” or “personalized firearms”—to varying degrees of technological maturity. • These firearms are designed to contain authorization systems which generally combine an authentication mechanism that actuates a blocking mechanism in a seamless process that is designed to take less time than handling and firing a conventional gun. • At least three products—two handguns and a shotgun—have been developed in the private sector by Armatix GmbH, Kodiak Industries, and iGun Technology Corporation that could at least be described as commercializable or pre-production. • There are no personalized firearms available commercially in the United States yet today, but Armatix and Kodiak are planning to bring their respective products to market in 2013. • Armatix of Germany has developed the Smart System which is composed of a .22 caliber pistol called the iP1 that is activated by the iW1, a device worn on the wrist like a watch that communicates using radio frequency identification (RFID).
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Gun Technology Patents
    Smart Gun Technology Patents In response to the President’s Memorandum on promoting Smart Gun Technology (SGT), the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Defense have outlined a draft Requirements Document for the procurement of SGT in the federal sector. The initial response from the Smart Gun Technology Working Group outlines the plan of action and explains the two pronged approach. The first is to lower the cost of bringing new technology to market, and second, by exercising their collective purchasing power, where appropriate, to foster the development of SGT. The White House has partnered with state, county, and municipal law enforcement agencies to establish the specific conditions under which they would consider purchasing firearms while advancing gun safety technology. Many patents related to the development of SGT have already been submitted for review. Below is a compilation the DHS Technology Scouting & Operational Experimentation office has put together: Gun with user notification Publication Number: US20050066567A1 Abstract: A gun is disclosed having conventional components and a holster. The gun has means for detecting removal of the gun from the holster, means for processing the output of the detection means, and means for authenticating the user of the gun. The gun has means for notifying remote authorities that the gun has been removed from the holster, means for receiving remote commands to lock the trigger and/or initiate a global positioning system. The gun has means for selectively locking the trigger from a remote location and means for selectively activating a global positioning system from the remote location. Method for Identification: Electronic Transponder.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 15/Thursday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 3819 has reviewed this action for factors and The Amendment Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, circumstances in which a normally 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– categorically excluded action may have In consideration of the foregoing, the 1963 Comp., p. 389. Federal Aviation Administration a significant environmental impact § 71.1 [Amended] requiring further analysis. The FAA has amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: determined no extraordinary ■ 2. The incorporation by reference in circumstances exist that warrant PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D, preparation of an environmental B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR Airspace Designations and Reporting assessment or environmental impact TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND Points, dated August 8, 2019, and study. REPORTING POINTS effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows: List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 Paragraph 6011 United States Area Airspace, Incorporation by reference, continues to read as follows: Navigation Routes. Navigation (air). * * * * * T–217 LEXINGTON, KY (HYK) TO BONEE, OH [AMENDED] Lexington, KY (HYK) VORTAC (Lat. 37°57′58.86″ N, long. 84°28′21.06″ W) BOSTR, OH FIX (Lat. 38°53′08.13″ N, long. 84°04′58.02″ W) HEDEN, OH FIX (Lat. 39°16′44.88″ N, long. 84°02′02.37″ W) PRUDE, OH FIX (Lat. 39°25′44.92″ N, long. 83°56′58.60″ W) Springfield, OH (SGH) DME (Lat.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0077643 A1 KERBRAT Et Al
    US 20100077643A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0077643 A1 KERBRAT et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 1, 2010 (54) FIREARM WITH ENHANCED RECOIL AND (30) Foreign Application Priority Data CONTROL CHARACTERISTICS Jun. 7, 2002 (CH) ....................................... O975/02 (76) Inventors: Renaud KERBRAT, Gland (CH): Jul. 31, 2002 (CH) ....................................... 1343/O2 Timothy Lindsay, Woodstock, MD Apr. 15, 2003 (CH) ....................................... O679/03 (US) Publication Classification Correspondence Address: (51) Int. Cl WILEY REN LLP F4A 25/00 (2006.01) WSRISE. Soons (us F4A 3/50 (2006.01) 9 (US) F4I435/00 (2006.01) (21) Appl. No.: 12/501,247 (52) U.S. Cl. ......................................................... 42/1.06 (22) Filed: Jul. 10, 2009 (57) ABSTRACT O O The invention comprises improved designs in a recoil control Related U.S. Application Data device comprising a bolt and slider for use in a variety of (63) Continuation of application No. PCT/US08/00336, firearms. In one embodiment, the bolt and slider are articu filed on Jan. 10, 2008, Continuation-in-part of appli- lated so that the displacement of the bolt results in a force cation No. 11/783,380, filed on Apr. 9, 2007, which is component accompanying the slideras it moves along a slider a continuation of application No. 10/454,780, filed on path that traverses a line formed by a linear firing axis of the Jun. 5, 2003, now Pat. No. 7,201,094. barrel of the firearm. The slider can have additional structural and functional features, including stabilizing features, vibra (60) Provisional application No. 60/879,530, filed on Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadowrun and Firearms Glossary Abbreviations and Acronyms
    Flash! Get it! Skip the splash page. Fonts! Get 'em! Firearms The Basics Firearms Creation Guide News Ammunition The Glossary Additions to the FCG Last Update Accessories Rules Links Search Ammunition Ammunition in General Ammunition in General Ammunition is one part of a firearm that Shadowrun writers have gone pretty far overboard with, in my Cartridges and Damages Codes opinion. Good enough for fun I suppose, but not enough to satisfy my sense of reality. Weapon caliber, SR Firearm/Cartridge Table functionality, and range of the ammunition itself have all been disregarded in the interest of simplicity. Understandable. But as far as I'm concerned, I'd like a better, more realistic explanation for some of the ammunition produced for the system. Regular Ammunition Disspelling and Explaining Advanced Ammunition Rules Ammunition by Caliber From page 276 of Shadowrun, Third Edition: "Many weapons offer two versions, for standard loads or for caseless ammunition." This is not a very well researched statement. Offering a wide variety of Specialized Ammunition weapons using both principles would not be very cost-effective for the manufacturer of the weapon. The APDU/APDSDU entire system of operation between the two principles is very different. Not to mention the implied politics Duplex Ammunition involved with allowing the general public to have access to such weapons. For more information on Expanding Bullets caseless ammunition, please click here. Explosive Ammunition Frangible Ammunition Another disagreeable statement occurs on page 279: "...each kind of gun can trade ammunition with Incendiary/API another of its class." If you're a GM and want to let your players get away with that purely for simplicty's sake, that's fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Storm Is All About Delivering Firepower
    American Antigravity.Com Page 1 of 10 By Tim Ventura & Art Schatz, August 8th, 2006 At a million rounds a minute, Metal Storm is all about delivering firepower. Whether you’re firing bullets from a rifle or grenades from a UGV, this unique new 21st-century weapons technology has you covered. Art Schatz takes us on a tour of the gun of tomorrow… AAG: I'd like to start out by congratulating you on your recent success in the Discovery Channel's "Future Weapons" program. I'd previously read about the Metal Storm technology a few years ago in Popular Science, but hadn't realized how far along you were in the development process until I saw your stunning demonstrations on television. Can you tell us a bit about what it was like to work with Discovery on this show? Schatz: The Discovery Channel has a very professional team and they produce widely watched programs so it was exciting for us to be working with such a fantastic team of people. We are well down the development path now and have come a long way with our engineering effort over the last 18 months. We have a number of products on the development path and we are moving to a very exciting stage with our unique technology. Discovery were so impressed with Metal Storm that they are considering doing another segment on a test range and highlighting our weapon system from the operational standpoint. AAG: How did the concept for Metal Storm actually originate? I mean, people have been complaining about cartridges & magazines for decades, but you're the first company to radically change the equation by actually putting the magazine into the barrel and sequentially firing stacked rounds.
    [Show full text]