DOCSLIB.ORG

Big-Lies-2012.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big-Lies-2012.Pdf Big Lies 2012: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Still Distorts the Truth By Jason Sattler Edited and Foreword by Joe Conason 1 Big Lies 2012: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Still Distorts the Truth By Jason Sattler Edited and Foreword by Joe Conason First Edition Copyright © 2012 by Eastern Harbor Media, LLC All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-300-34081-2 2 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 Big Lie One: The GOP Reveals Debt Clock They Misplaced In 2001 ............................... 7 Big Lie Two: Paul Ryan Repackages The Gingrich Medicare Hoax ................................ 10 Big Lie Three: Killing Obamacare And Stealing From Seniors ........................................14 Big Lie Four: Fabricating A Failed Obama Presidency .................................................... 16 Big Lie Five: Job Creationism .......................................................................................... 19 Big Lie Six: Redistributing A Failed Argument ................................................................ 22 Big Lie Seven: Republicans Are Fiscally Conservative ..................................................... 25 Big Lie Eight: The Osama Swiftboaters ........................................................................... 27 Big Lie Nine: “Completely False” Race-Baiting On Welfare Reform .............................. 29 Big Lie Ten: The Right To Be An American ...................................................................... 31 About the Author ............................................................................................................... 35 About the Editor ................................................................................................................ 35 3 Introduction Nothing has better characterized the vicious 2012 presidential campaign—which began, for Republican leaders, with the inauguration of Barack Obama in January 2009—than the re-emergence of disinformation and dissembling as the right’s primary weapons in political combat. While these techniques scarcely represent anything new, as I documented in Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine And How It Distorts The Truth (St. Martin’s Press, 2003), time has multiplied the capacity of the Republican Party to amplify falsehoods about the economy, health care reform, civil rights, immigration, and a host of other critical issues. Added to the truth-destroying artillery of Fox News Channel plus The Rush Limbaugh Show and all its broadcast imitators are the online venues, such as the Breitbart empire and—perhaps most significantly in an election year—the vast advertising resources in all media provided by dark campaign money under the Citizens United ruling to groups like Karl Rove’s American Crossroads and the Koch brothers’ Americans for Prosperity. Just review the fact-checking sites that have become so influential over this cycle, and it is easy to see that Republican deception is the dominant theme of this campaign—and of politics in America today. On sites like the Pulitzer Prize-winning Politifact, as science journalist Chris Mooney has documented, the frequency and intensity of “Pinocchio” or “Pants on Fire” ratings earned by Republicans far outstrips those won by Democrats, even though mainstream fact-checkers strive to achieve partisan parity. Well before the election season officially began, the likelihood of being rated a liar was roughly two to three times greater among Republicans than Democrats. We have argued in The National Memo and elsewhere that this imbalance is not accidental, for the capacity of Republicans to attract voters depends heavily on concealing the historical results of their policies. Consider the economy, which voters and pundits agree is the most salient question in a nation still recovering from the Great Recession. Polling data shows that most voters still hold the Bush administration responsible for the ruinous condition of the economy, dissatisfied as they may be with the progress achieved since President Obama took office. Yet roughly half the electorate still regards Mitt Romney and his fellow Republicans as more likely to improve the economy and create more jobs. 4 Based on the historical record, this is a grave misconception—as former President Bill Clinton has pointed out many times. And characteristically, he has done the arithmetic. At the Democratic National Convention in September, Clinton explained: "Since 1961, for 52 years now, the Republicans have held the White House 28 years, the Democrats 24. In those 52 years, our private economy has produced 66 million private-sector jobs. So what's the job score? Republicans 24 million, Democrats 42." When CNN fact-checked Clinton’s numbers, the network found that he was just slightly off—because he was too generous to the Republicans. Their numbers showed “a net increase of 44.7 million jobs created during the Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton and Obama administrations, compared to a 23.3 million figure during the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and both Bush administrations.” The partisan pattern of Republican economic incompetence goes back much further than 1961, however, as Dr. James Gilligan of New York University carefully documented last year in his path-breaking book Why Some Politicians Are More Dangerous Than Others (and as I reported in Big Lies as well). Using statistics compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Bureau of Economic Research, Gilligan found that unemployment rose during every Republican administration and fell during every Democratic administration for more than a century. Every Republican president left unemployment higher than when he entered the White House, and every Democratic president left it lower, with unemployment rates remaining higher for longer periods under the Republicans. “If we count up the net sum of all the increases that occurred during Republican administrations from 1900 through 2008, we find that the Republicans brought about a cumulative increase of 27.8 percent in the unemployment rate, and the Democrats an almost exactly equal decrease of 26.5 percent,” Gilligan calculated. The reason was that America suffered about three times as many months of recession under Republican government than under Democratic government, from 1900 through 2010, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research—an organization headed for many years by the conservative Harvard economist Martin Feldstein, who is currently among Mitt Romney’s top economic advisors. Recessions began 17 times during Republican presidencies and only six times during Democratic presidencies, and always lasted several months longer under Republicans, too. Only a torrent of malarkey, as Joe Biden would say, can distract and deceive the citizenry about these basic facts— combined with the historical amnesia that remains our most crippling political affliction. But the economy is certainly not the only important issue distorted by Republican mendacity. As National Memo’s executive editor Jason Sattler demonstrates in these brief but biting essays, the trumpery extends from health care reform and Medicare to the federal deficit, taxes, and the record of the Obama administration itself. What is most troubling about this year’s campaign is the determination of the Republican ticket and its supporters to mislead voters not only about the president’s achievements and intentions, but about their own plans for the nation’s future. The Big Lie lives. But in these pages you will find the big truths that are the only effective antidote. We’ve made them available for free, because we believe that reliable information and honest analysis are vital to defending democracy and defeating plutocracy. 5 I hope you will share Big Lies 2012: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Still Distorts the Truth as widely as possible between now and Election Day. Joe Conason Editor-in-Chief The National Memo 6 The Big Lie: The Republican National Convention featured a debt clock to hold the president accountable for the mounting debt. The Truth: Republican policies and the economy they created are responsible for the vast majority of the debt and the Romney/Ryan budget plans would only increase the debt. One of the most notable decorations at the 2012 Republican National Convention was a clock that counted the amount of debt racked up from the moment the event opened. It was supposed to be a visual indictment of the president’s policies—the result of “wasteful government spending.” But the Republican debt clock would have been more honest if it had been captioned by the RNC’s slogan: “We Built It!” No one at the podium in Tampa addressed the actual source of the debt. The most candid speaker was New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who said he hopes everybody has forgotten: “It doesn’t matter how we got here.” Facts are now officially for the other guys. During the Republican National Convention, Mitt Romney’s pollster Neil Newhouse finally said something that fact-checkers found accurate: “We’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact- checkers.” The Romney campaign’s disregard for facts is warmly embraced by a right wing that has built up a vast alternative media to reinforce their own version of reality. In this reality, President Obama’s 2009 budget was the first budget ever to hit a $1 trillion-dollar deficit, which was entirely the result of his policies. The fact that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • President Biden Appeals for Unity He Faces a Confluence of Crises Stemming from Pandemic, Insurrection & Race by BRIAN A
    V26, N21 Thursday, Jan.21, 2021 President Biden appeals for unity He faces a confluence of crises stemming from pandemic, insurrection & race By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – In what remains a crime scene from the insurrection on Jan. 6, President Joe Biden took the oath of office at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday, appealing to all Americans for “unity” and the survival of the planet’s oldest democ- racy. “We’ve learned again that democracy is precious,” when he declared in strongman fashion, “I alone can fix Biden said shortly before noon Wednesday after taking the it.” oath of office from Chief Justice John Roberts. “Democ- When Trump fitfully turned the reins over to Biden racy is fragile. And at this hour, my friends, democracy has without ever acknowledging the latter’s victory, it came prevailed.” after the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 that Senate Minor- His words of assurance came four years to the day ity Leader Mitch McConnell said he had “provoked,” leading since President Trump delivered his dystopian “American to an unprecedented second impeachment. It came with carnage” address, coming on the heels of his Republican National Convention speech in Cleveland in July 2016 Continued on page 3 Biden’s critical challenge By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Here is the most critical chal- lenge facing President Biden: Vaccinate as many of the 320 million Americans as soon as possible. While the Trump administration’s Operation Warp “Hoosiers have risen to meet Speed helped develop the CO- VID-19 vaccine in record time, these unprecedented challenges. most of the manufactured doses haven’t been injected into the The state of our state is resilient arms of Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Pareene: Pundit of the Century
    Alex Pareene: Pundit of the Century Alex Pareene, first of Wonkette, then Gawker, then Salon, then back to Gawker, then a stillborn First Run Media project, and now Splinter News is a great pundit. In fact, he is a brilliant pundit and criminally underrated. His talent is generally overlooked because he has by-and-large written for outlets derided by both the right and the center. Conservatives have treated Salon as a punching bag for years now, and Gawker—no matter how biting or insightful it got—was never treated as serious by the mainstream because of their willingness to sneer, and even cuss at, the powers that be. If instead Mr. Pareene had been blogging at Mother Jones or Slate for the last ten years, he would be delivering college commencement speeches by now. In an attempt to make the world better appreciate this elucidating polemicist, here are some of his best hits. Mr. Pareene first got noticed, rightfully, for his “Hack List” feature when he was still with Salon. Therein, he took mainstream pundits both “left” and right to task for, well, being idiots. What is impressive about the list is that although it was written years ago, when America’s political landscape was dramatically different from what it is today, it still holds up. In 2012, after noting that while The New York Times has good reporting and that not all of their opinion columns were bad… most of them were. Putting it succinctly: “Ross Douthat is essentially a parody of the sort of conservative Times readers would find palatable, now that David Brooks is a sad shell of his former self, listlessly summarizing random bits of social science and pretending the Republican Party is secretly moderate and reasonable.” Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccarthyism and the Big Lie
    University of Central Florida STARS PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements 1-1-1953 McCarthyism and the big lie Milton Howard Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Book is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Howard, Milton, "McCarthyism and the big lie" (1953). PRISM: Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements. 45. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/prism/45 and the BIG LIE McCARTHYISM AND THE BIG LIE By MILTON HOWARD A man is standing on the steps of the US. Trsssnry Buildiig in downtown New York. He irs &outing his contempt for any American who believes we can have peace in tbis world. He says such Americas are "Kremlin dupes." He derides them as "egg-heads and appeaser&" The speaker is Joe McCarthy, U.S. Senator from Wisconsin. He holds the crowd's attention. He has studied the trade of lashing hysteria into rm audience. Five years ago, he was a little known pvliti- . cian. Today, his name has become known throughout the world. .Hehas baptized the poIitical fact known as McCarthykn. Americans began to get a whiff of this new fact when millions eud- denly faced what is now known as "The Reign of Fear." Three years ago, the President of the U.S.A. startled the world. He said that the American citizens of the state of Wisconsin were afraia.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Marx and Mendacity: Can There Be a Politics Without Hypocrisy?
    Analyse & Kritik 01+02/2015 (© Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart) S. 521 Martin Jay Marx and Mendacity: Can There Be a Politics without Hypocrisy? Abstract: As demonstrated by Marx's erce defence of his integrity when anonymously accused of lying in l872, he was a principled believer in both personal honesty and the value of truth in politics. Whether understood as enabling an accurate, `scientic' depiction of the contradictions of the present society or a normative image of a truly just society to come, truth-telling was privileged by Marx over hypocrisy as a political virtue. Contemporary Marxists like Alain Badiou continue this tradition, arguing that revolutionary politics should be understood as a `truth procedure'. Drawing on the alternative position of political theorists such as Hannah Arendt, who distrusted the monologic and absolutist implications of a strong notion of truth in politics, this paper defends the role that hypocrisy and mendacity, understood in terms of lots of little lies rather than one big one, can play in a pluralist politics, in which, pace Marx, rhetoric, opinion and the clash of values resist being subsumed under a singular notion of the truth. 1. Introduction In l872, an anonymous attack was launched in the Berlin Concordia: Zeitschrift für die Arbeiterfrage against Karl Marx for having allegedly falsied a quotation from an 1863 parliamentary speech by the British Liberal politician, and future Prime Minister, William Gladstone in his own Inaugural Address to the First International in l864. The polemic was written, so it was later disclosed, by the eminent liberal political economist Lujo Brentano.1 Marx vigorously defended himself in a response published later that year in Der Volksstaat, launching a bitter debate that would drag on for two decades, involving Marx's daughter Eleanor, an obscure Cambridge don named Sedly Taylor, and even Gladstone himself, who backed Brentano's version.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL SPEECH, DOUBLESPEAK, and CRITICAL-THINKING SKILLS in AMERICAN EDUCATION by Doris E. Minin-White a Capstone Project
    POLITICAL SPEECH, DOUBLESPEAK, AND CRITICAL-THINKING SKILLS IN AMERICAN EDUCATION by Doris E. Minin-White A capstone project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in English as a Second Language. Hamline University Saint Paul, Minnesota December, 2017 Capstone Project Trish Harvey Content Expert: Joseph White 2 My Project In this project, I will attempt to identify and analyze common cases of doublespeak in selected samples of political discourse, delivered by the two most recent U. S. presidents: Barack Obama and Donald Trump. The sample will include the transcripts from two speeches and two debates for each of the speakers. The speeches chosen will be their inaugural addresses and their presidential nomination acceptance speeches. The debates will be the first and second debates held, as part of the presidential campaign, in which the selected speakers participated. I chose to include speeches from the presidential inaugural address because they represent, perhaps, the greatest opportunity for presidents to speak with impact to the people they represent and to their fellow lawmakers who are generally present at the inauguration. I also chose the speeches they made when accepting the presidential nominations of their respective parties, because it is their opportunity to outline what their party’s platform is, what they feel are the important issues of the day, and how they intend to pursue those issues. Finally, I chose presidential debates because political discourse in this context is more spontaneous. According to the Commission on Presidential Debates (2017), a non-partisan entity that has organized presidential debates in the United States since 1988, political debates are carefully prepared and organized.
    [Show full text]
  • The View from Here
    The View from Here Figure 1 -- The iconic image of the South Canyon Fire blow-up that will claim the lives of 14 wildland firefighters. Acknowledging our current culture and its shortcomings while using its strengths to lead change. December 2018 The View from Here 1 This collection represents collective insight into how we operate and why we must alter some of our most ingrained practices and perspectives. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 I Risk ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. The Illusion of Control ............................................................................................................. 5 2. It’s Going to Happen Again ................................................................................................... 14 3. The Big Lie – Honor the Fallen .............................................................................................. 19 4. The Problem with Zero ......................................................................................................... 26 5. RISK, GAIN, and LOSS – What are We Willing to Accept? .................................................... 29 6. How Do We Know This Job is Dangerous? ............................................................................ 39 II Culture .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania House of Representatives
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STATE GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING STATE CAPITOL HARRISBURG, PA IRVIS OFFICE BUILDING ROOM G-50 THURSDAY, APRIL 1, 2 021 12:30 P.M. PRESENTATION ON ELECTION INTEGRITY AND ACCESSIBILITY POLICY BEFORE: HONORABLE SETH M. GROVE, MAJORITY CHAIRMAN HONORABLE RUSS DIAMOND HONORABLE MATTHEW D. DOWLING HONORABLE DAWN W. KEEFER HONORABLE ANDREW LEWIS HONORABLE RYAN E. MACKENZIE HONORABLE BRETT R. MILLER HONORABLE ERIC R. NELSON HONORABLE JASON ORTITAY HONORABLE CLINT OWLETT HONORABLE FRANCIS X. RYAN HONORABLE PAUL SCHEMEL HONORABLE LOUIS C. SCHMITT, JR. HONORABLE CRAIG T. STAATS HONORABLE JEFF C. WHEELAND Debra B. Miller dbmreporting@msn. com 2 BEFORE (continued): HONORABLE MARGO L. DAVIDSON, DEMOCRATIC CHAIRWOMAN HONORABLE ISABELLA V. FITZGERALD HONORABLE KRISTINE C. HOWARD HONORABLE MAUREEN E. MADDEN HONORABLE BENJAMIN V. SANCHEZ HONORABLE JOE WEBSTER HONORABLE REGINA G. YOUNG COMMITTEE STAFF PRESENT: MICHAELE TOTINO MAJORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MICHAEL HECKMANN MAJORITY RESEARCH ANALYST SHERRY EBERLY MAJORITY LEGISLATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT NICHOLAS HIMEBAUGH DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 3 I N D E X TESTIFIERS * * * NAME PAGE DR. B. CLIFFORD NEUMAN DIRECTOR, USC CENTER FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS SECURITY; ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF COMPUTER SCIENCE PRACTICE, INFORMATION SCIENCES INSTITUTE, VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA...................11 DR. WILLIAM T. ADLER SENIOR TECHNOLOGIST FOR ELECTIONS & DEMOCRACY, CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY...................11
    [Show full text]
  • Election and Debate Watch Toolkit
    Election and Debate Watch Toolkit Table of Contents Introduction Planning for the Debates & Election Calendar of Events …………………………….………………………………...………..4 Workshops/National Events………...……………………………………………………..5 Four-Quadrant Political Ideology Digital Literacy & Digital Polarization Deliberative Dialogue & Civil Discourse Hosting & Watching the Debates CPD News Release: Debate Moderators ……………………………..…………………..6 CPD News Release: Debate Format………..……………………………………………..7 ADP National Discord Conversations ………………………………………………..…..8 On the Debate Watch 2020 Discord Server …………………………………………..…..9 Debate Ballot …………………………………………………………………………....10 Post-Debate Times Talks: A National Conversation to Debrief the Debates…………………………11 Voter Education and Engagement…………………………………………………….....12 Resources Nonpartisan Election Resources…………………………………………………………13 Digital Literacy SIFT: Digital Literacy Guide ……………………………………………..…..…14 Introduction to Mind Over Chatter ……………….……………………....…..…15 Fact-Checking Resources …………….………...…………..……………………17 Deliberative Dialogue/Civil Discourse: Resources for Teaching About Deliberations, Dialogue, and Facilitation ….......18 “Times Talk” Example Tool Kit …………………………………….…………..20 Scientific American (2/2018) “The Tribalism of Truth”……….………………………...27 The Commission on Presidential Debates’ Debate Watch Guide……………………….31 The New York Times “Let’s Scrap The Presidential Debates”…………………………..32 The New York Times “What Should Be the Purpose of a Presidential Debate?”…..……35 All In to Vote One Pager ………………………………………………………………..39 Virtual
    [Show full text]
  • The Weird History of Usamerican Fascism: a Guide (1979-2019) Phd in Critical and Cultural Theory 2019 M.C
    The Weird History of USAmerican Fascism: A Guide (1979-2019) PhD in Critical and Cultural Theory 2019 M.C. McGrady Summary The future, as ever, can be read in comic books. Foretold by the Dark Age of Comics, the doom that now comes to Earth arrives in the form of self-realizing eschatologies, horrors born out of the rutting between unfettered capitalism and its favorite child, technological hubris. When the Big Two comic book publishers began hiring British and Irish authors en masse over the course of the 1980s, these writers brought with them a critical eye sharpened by the political and economic cruelty of the decade. The victims of the Iron Lady came to the New World and set their sights on the empire of the Teflon President, using superhero stories to explore the ideological weapons deployed in the service of global capitalism. The Weird History of USAmerican Fascism tracks the interrelated networks of popular culture and fascism in the United States to demonstrate the degree to which contemporary USAmerican politics embodies the future that the fictional dystopias of the past warned us about. Although the trans-Atlantic political developments of 2016 and their aftermath have sparked a widespread interest in a resurgent Anglophone fascism and its street-level movements – seen most obviously in the loose collection of white supremacists known as the ‘alt- right’ – this interest has been hamstrung by the historical aversion to a serious study of popular and ‘nerd’ culture during the twentieth century. By paying attention to the conceptual and interpersonal networks that emerged from the comic books and videogames of the 1980s, The Weird History of USAmerican Fascism fills a critical lacuna in cultural theory while correcting recent oversights in the academic analysis of contemporary fascism, providing an essential guide to the past, present, and future of the bizarre world of USAmerican politics.
    [Show full text]