What Are the Real Impacts of the Use of Drifting Fads on Pelagic Marine Ecosystems?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Are the Real Impacts of the Use of Drifting Fads on Pelagic Marine Ecosystems? F I S H and F I S H E R I E S , 2013, 14, 391–415 Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Laurent Dagorn1, Kim N. Holland2, Victor Restrepo3 & Gala Moreno4 1Institut de Recherche pour le De´veloppement (IRD), UMR 212, PO Box 570, Victoria, Seychelles, 2Hawaiian Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB), University of Hawaii, PO Box 1346, Kaneohe, HI, 96744, USA, 3ISSF, 805 15th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA and 4AZTI-Tecnalia/Herrera Kaia., Portualdea, z/g, 20110, Pasaia, Gipuzkoa, Spain Abstract Correspondence: The use of fish aggregating devices (FADs) by purse seine fisheries has come under Laurent Dagorn, Institut de Recherche increasing criticism for its potential deleterious impacts on tuna stocks, for high pour le De´veloppe- levels of by-catch and threats to the biodiversity of tropical pelagic ecosystems. ment (IRD), UMR Here, we review the current state of scientific knowledge of this fishing technique 212, PO Box 570, and current management strategies. Our intent is to encourage objective discussion Victoria, Seychelles of the topic and highlight areas worthy of future research. We show that catching Tel/Fax: +248 4224 742 juvenile tuna around FADs does not necessarily result in overfishing of stocks, E-mail: laurent. although more selective fishing techniques would likely help obtain higher yield. [email protected] Levels of non-tuna by-catch are comparable to or less than in other commercial tuna fisheries and are primarily comprised of species that are not considered threa- Received 7 Nov tened. Accordingly, to minimize impacts on ecosystem balance, there is merit in 2011 considering that all species captured in purse seine fisheries (excluding vulnerable species such as turtles and sharks) should be retained, but the consequences of such a measure should be carefully examined before implementation. The take of vulnerable species could be further reduced by introduction of additional mitigation measures, but their potential benefits would be limited without parallel efforts with other gears. Finally, there is no unequivocal empirical evidence that FADs repre- sent an ‘ecological trap’ that inherently disrupts tuna biology although further research should focus on this issue. We encourage RFMOs to expand and improve their FAD management plans. Under appropriate management regimes, FAD fish- ing could be an ecologically and economically sensible fishing method. Keywords By-catch, ecological trap, FAD, purse seine, tuna Introduction 392 Purse seine fishing on floating objects 394 Impacts on tuna stocks 395 Impacts on non-target species: by-catch 399 Impacts on habitats and ecological consequences 401 The route towards the sustainable use of drifting FADs 407 Monitoring the numbers of electronic buoys and numbers of FADs (FAD management plans) 407 Reducing fishing mortality of juvenile bigeye and yellowfin tuna 408 © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00478.x 391 Are FADs bad? L Dagorn et al. Reducing the fishery-induced mortality of by-catch 409 Conclusion 411 Acknowledgements 412 References 412 This study discusses only the industrial use of Introduction drifting FADs. The use of FADs by purse seine Many species of marine fishes aggregate around fleets started in the 1980s and rapidly expanded floating structures such as drifting logs or palm throughout the early 1990s. In the remainder of fronds (Castro et al. 2002; Taquet et al. 2007). this review, the term ‘FAD’ refers to any man- This behaviour was first reported in 200 AD in made floating object built for the purpose of fish- the Mediterranean, when the Roman author Op- ing, whereas the term ‘log’ refers to any natural pian described the use of floating objects to catch object and the term ‘floating object’ is used when dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus, Coryphaenidae) referring to both FADs and logs. (cited in Dempster and Taquet 2004). In the late The use of drifting FADs by the purse seine fish- 1950s, the first tuna (Scombridae) purse seiners ery raises the possibility of three potential negative operating in the eastern Pacific Ocean found it impacts: (i) reduction in yield per recruit of target was feasible to capture schools of tunas associated species (tunas), (ii) increased by-catch and pertur- with natural floating objects such as logs (Hall bation of pelagic ecosystem balance and (iii) dele- 1998). Thereafter, industrial tuna purse seiners terious alteration of the normal movements of the increasingly focussed on using drifting floating species associated with FADs (Fonteneau et al. objects to expedite and augment their catches. 2000; Bromhead et al. 2003; Morgan 2011). There are two main reasons for this focus. First, First, let us address the issue of how FADs might because floating objects are visible at the surface contribute to overfishing of tuna stocks. Although (or their positions are already known – see below), FAD catches are usually mainly comprised of adult they help fishers reduce the search time required skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis, Scombridae), to locate fish schools. Finding and keeping track of they are also usually characterized by the co- floating objects has been further advanced by occurrence of small yellowfin (Thunnus albacares, attaching radio beacons or satellite-linked GPS Scombridae) and bigeye (T. obesus, Scombridae) units. This permits tracking in real time and from tuna (although there are large regional and sea- great distances. Recently, the practice of attaching sonal variations in the co-occurrence of these spe- satellite-linked echosounder fish finder units to cies). By contrast, purse seine catches on free- floating objects further improves efficiency by swimming schools are typically dominated by informing fishers as to which ones might have fish large yellowfin tuna and skipjack tuna. Because of underneath and are then worth visiting. Second, the common presence of small bigeye and yellow- floating objects increase the vulnerability of tunas fin tuna in sets on floating objects, this practice, if to fishing; sets around floating objects have higher not managed, could affect the yield per recruit of success rates (90%) than those made on free- these species and could lead to excessive reduction swimming schools (50%) (Fonteneau et al. 2000; of stocks. Suzuki et al. 2003; Miyake et al. 2010). Because Second, FADs also attract non-tuna species floating objects provided such a major increase in (Hunter and Mitchell 1967), and these species are the catchability of tunas (Marsac et al. 2000), fish- taken when purse seiners fish on FADs (Hall ers started to construct and release artificial fish 1998; Romanov 2002; Amande` et al. 2010). aggregating devices (FADs). There are two basic Thus, the capture of non-target species associated categories of FADs – anchored and drifting. with floating objects could negatively impact biodi- Anchored FADs are primarily (although not exclu- versity either by removing by-catch species in sively) used in small-scale coastal, semi-artisanal unsustainable quantities or by selective removal of and sport fisheries, whereas open ocean drifting some components of the pelagic ecosystem. In con- FADs are used by industrial purse seine fisheries. trast, free-swimming school sets are usually char- 392 © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, F I S H and F I S H E R I E S , 14, 391–415 Are FADs bad? L Dagorn et al. acterized by low amounts of by-catch of non-target tional Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic species. However, even though by-catch at FADs Tunas, ICCAT, the Indian Ocean Tuna Commis- may be quite small, the fact that fishing on float- sion, IOTC, and the Western and Central Pacific ing objects is a part of the fleet’s overall strategy Fisheries Commission, WCPFC) have implemented results in an increase in by-catch for the purse several measures to regulate the use of FADs seine fishery as a whole (Romanov 2002). (Table 1), and some research projects dedicated to Finally, the release of large numbers of FADs in FADs have been conducted. However, major gaps the ocean could change the natural environment in knowledge still exist, and there is a need to of tunas. The potential effects of such habitat mod- review what is known about the impacts of FAD ification on the behaviour and biology of tunas fishing and to investigate new management mea- have been grouped under the ‘ecological trap’ sures. hypothesis (Marsac et al. 2000; Hallier and Gaert- The objective of this study is to review the cur- ner 2008). This hypothesis contends that deploy- rent knowledge about tropical tuna purse seine ing FADs in unnaturally large numbers could fisheries and the relevant aspects of the biology either entrain tuna in locations that they might and behaviour of species that associate with float- normally leave or, conversely, take them to places ing objects. More than 60% of the literature on to which they would not normally go, thereby FADs (combining drifting and anchored FADs, impacting negatively their biology (e.g. growth Dempster and Taquet 2004) are non-peer- rate or reproductive success). reviewed articles, with a large portion being work- After reviewing these potential impacts, Fonte- ing documents presented at Tuna RFMOs meet- neau et al. (2000) and Bromhead et al. (2003) ings. A decade after the reviews by Fonteneau concluded that, owing to the lack of quantitative et al. (2000) and Bromhead et al. (2003), we aim data, potential negative long-term effects of FADs to present the scientific and management progress on tuna stocks and pelagic ecosystems were diffi- made in this field, providing an evaluation of what cult to evaluate and remained hypothetical. How- is actually known and what is not known. We ever, they cautioned that the continuing use of hope to encourage objective discussion of the good FADs at a large scale could have detrimental and bad features of fishing on floating objects and effects.
Recommended publications
  • Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: the Ethnographic Record
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 176-186 (1981). Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: The Ethnographic Record CATHERINE S. FOWLER JOYCE E. BATH HE importance of fishing to the ethno­ 1930's as part of his general ethnographic Tgraphic subsistence regimes of lake- investigations of the Nevada Northern Paiute. and river-based Northern Paiute groups has Park also made material culture collections been suggested by several writers but not fully that included fishing gear for the Peabody documented. For example, in the context of Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology and the Culture Element Distribution surveys, for the American Museum of Natural History. Stewart (1941:370-371) affirms that fish These objects, as well as others from collec­ were taken by most groups using specialized tions made in 1875 by Stephen Powers and in gear such as nets, baskets, weirs, platforms, 1916 by Samuel Barrett, were recently harpoons, and gorge and composite hooks. studied and photographed as part of a project Curtis (1926:71) notes the use of dip nets, gill to make Park's data more readily available.' nets, bident spears, gorges, and weirs. And Taken together, these materials significantly Wheat (1967) describes in detail the manufac­ expand our knowledge of Northern Paiute ture and use of the single-barbed harpoon. fishing techniques, and by implication, sug­ However, only Speth (1969) has attempted to gest that fishing and other lacustrine, riverine, place Northern Paiute fishing in its broader and marsh-oriented subsistence pursuits were social and technological contexts, and her vitally important in the economic systems of paper is concerned exclusively with fishing at several Northern Paiute groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Tips
    Fishing Tips These are only tips, other methods may be preferred Spring Summer Fall Mid May - Mid June Mid June to Mid August Mid August to Oct If fishing in less than 15' and waters & colder than Water temps 55° to 65°, fish about 15-25' Walleyes 55°, use jigs tipped w/minnows; If water temp use slip bobber rigs w/leeches or spinner rigs Line: 6-8 lb clear reaches 55° and warmer switch your bait to with live bait or a jig w/live bait; Also try As water temps begin to cool, reverse the mono or florocarbon leeches; If water temps are below 55° and fish fishing in 10' or less with nightcrawlers on 1/8 oz back to the spring fishing techniques are lathargic, use silver, gold & green crank baits jigs near deep weed lines; Water temps 65° - 75° as described by water temps and depths. Rod: 6-6 1/2' Medium such as shad raps - if temps are even colder, use in 25' deep plus troll w/deep diving crank baits suspending jerk baits. Small & Large Mouth Bass In water temps up to 60° fish various depths. Use crank and suspending jerk baits along w/grubs At 70° start using tube jigs or try leeches or night Line: 8-10 lb clear and large plastic worms. Never count out using crawlers at about 20 -25' are best. Top water As temps begin to cool, reverse the process. mono or florocarbon a topwater bait at anytime! At about 60° the fishing is best the first 2 hours after sunrise and Try using some large plastic worms for top water action explodes; continue using the last 2 hours before sunset; Poppers and large mouth - they work well.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Guide to Fishing
    Beginner’s Guide to Fishing www.dnr.sc.gov/aquaticed It is my hope that this guide will make your journey into the world of recreational angling (fishin’) uncomplicated, enjoyable and successful. As you begin this journey, I encourage you to keep in mind the words of the 15th century nun Dame Juliana Berner, “Piscator non solum piscatur.” Being a 15th century nun, naturally Dame Juliana tended to write in Latin. This phrase roughly translates to “there is more to fishing than catching fish.” Dame Juliana knows what she’s talking about, as she’s believed to have penned the earliest known volume of sportfishing, the beginners guide of its day, “ A Tretyse of Fysshyne with an Angle.” As you begin to apply the ideas and concepts in our beginners guide, you will start to develop new skills; you will get to exercise your patience; and, most importantly, you will begin to share special experiences with your family and friends. In the early nineties, I can remember sitting in a canoe with my four-year-old daughter on the upper end of Lake Russell fishing for bream with cane poles and crickets. My daughter looked back at me from the front seat of the canoe and said, “Daddy, I sure do hate to kill these crickets, but we got to have bait.” Later, we spent hours together in the backyard perfecting her cast and talking about how to place the bait in just the right spot. We took those new skills to the pond. The first good cast, bait placed like a pro, and a “big bass” hit like a freight train.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines
    Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 7 Fishing for Fairness Poverty, Morality and Marine Resource Regulation in the Philippines Michael Fabinyi Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/ National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fabinyi, Michael. Title: Fishing for fairness [electronic resource] : poverty, morality and marine resource regulation in the Philippines / Michael Fabinyi. ISBN: 9781921862656 (pbk.) 9781921862663 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Fishers--Philippines--Attitudes. Working poor--Philippines--Attitudes. Marine resources--Philippines--Management. Dewey Number: 333.91609599 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Cover image: Fishers plying the waters of the Calamianes Islands, Palawan Province, Philippines, 2009. Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents Foreword . ix Acknowledgements . xiii Selected Tagalog Glossary . xvii Abbreviations . xviii Currency Conversion Rates . xviii 1 . Introduction: Fishing for Fairness . 1 2 . Resource Frontiers: Palawan, the Calamianes Islands and Esperanza . 21 3 . Economic, Class and Status Relations in Esperanza . 53 4 . The ‘Poor Moral Fisher’: Local Conceptions of Environmental Degradation, Fishing and Poverty in Esperanza . 91 5 . Fishing, Dive Tourism and Marine Protected Areas . 121 6 . Fishing in Marine Protected Areas: Resistance, Youth and Masculinity .
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE WOODLAND FISHING METHODS at the BLUE WATER BRIDGE SOUTH SITE (Afho-7)
    MIDDLE WOODLAND FISHING METHODS AT THE BLUE WATER BRIDGE SOUTH SITE (AfHo-7) By Shari L. Prowse MA Abstract This thesis examines the fishing methods used by the pre-contact Native inhabitants of the Blue Water Bridge South site (AfHo-7) through ethnographic and archaeological research, the fish fauna remains and the fishing related artifacts excavated from the site. From these lines of evidence it was determined that spring spawning fish species such as lake sturgeon and walleye were being harvested with the use of harpoons and spears for the former, and fish nets and leisters for the latter. Evidence also strongly suggests the existence of an intensive summer fishery that used nets for the capture of spawning freshwater drum as well as a spring and summer opportunistic fishery that employed fish- hooks and nets. This site was inferred to have followed a spring early-summer macroband settlement pattern with perhaps a minor fall occupation that may have involved fishing for spawning lake whitefish. Based on the overall pattern of settlement and subsistence inferred for the Blue Water Bridge South site and comparisons with other Middle Woodland sites within the central Great Lakes region, it was concluded that the Middle Woodland pattern of settlement and subsistence was highly variable and influenced by both environmental variables and human choice. Chapter 1 Introduction Statement of Goal of Study The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the fishing methods employed by the Native peoples at the Blue Water Bridge South (AfHo-7) site, and by extension, other Middle Woodland peoples. Data will be derived from the fish remains and fishing related artifacts excavated from the Blue Water Bridge South site and will be interpreted in light of information obtained from ethnographic and ethnohistoric sources, archaeological fish research, and fish biology and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Fishing Methods
    FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CENTRE BASIC FISHING METHODS SEAFISH FLUME TANK Manchester Street Hull APRIL 2005 CLASSIFICATION OF FISHING GEAR Surrounding nets Purse nets Ring nets Seine nets Beach seines Scottish seines Anchor seines Pair seines Trawls Beam trawl Otter trawl Pair trawl Multi rig trawls Pelagic trawls Pelagic pair trawls Dredges Scallop dredges Gill nets Gill nets Trammel nets Drift nets Traps Pots and creels Fyke nets Hooks and lines Long lines Jigging Trolling Pole lines Miscellaneous Lift nets Cast nets Harpoons Fish pumps ©Seafish 1 18/05/2005 GEAR DESCRIPTIONS ENCIRCLING RING NET Net operated by surrounding a shoal of pelagic fish with a “wall” of netting, often operated by two boats. PURSE SEINE A large net used to surround a shoal of pelagic fish, the bottom of which is then drawn together to enclose them BEACH SEINE An encircling net shot from a small boat then drawn ashore by ropes. ANCHOR SEINE An encircling net shot in the open sea using very long ropes to lay out the net and ropes on the seabed prior to hauling from a boat at anchor. Sometimes called Danish seine. SCOTTISH SEINE An encircling net shot in the open sea using very long ropes to lay out the net and ropes on the seabed prior to towing the net closed and hauling from a boat under its own power. Sometimes called fly dragging or fly shooting. TOWED GEAR BEAM TRAWL Trawl towed on the seabed in which the net is held open by a wood or steel beam. OTTER TRAWL Trawl towed on the seabed, held open by a pair of otter boards (trawl doors).
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Impact Assessment of Derelict Fish Traps in St. Thomas and St
    Survey and Impact Assessment of Derelict Fish Traps in St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands Randy Clark Simon J. Pittman Timothy A. Battista Chris Caldow NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science June 2012 NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NOS NCCOS 147 NOAA NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment Acknowledgements Many thanks go to NOAA’s Marine Debris Program for providing the funding for this project. We would like to thank all those who made this project successful, we are grateful for your help and assistance: To all the members of the St. Thomas Fishermen’s Association, and in particular, Julian Magras, Darryl Bryan and Winston Ledee. Lance Horn and Glenn Taylor with NOAA’s Undersea Research Center, and all the crew from the NOAA ship R/V Nancy Foster- thanks for helping us with the derelict fi sh trap verifi cation! Thank you to the great folks at the U.S. Navy’s Naval Surface Warfare Center-Panama City Division, especially Ana Ziegler and Aamir Qaiyumi; and Rafe Boulon and Ken Wilde at the National Park Service, St. John Virgin Islands Coral Reef National Monument. In addition, we would like to thank L. Bauer, M. Kendall, and A. Uhrin for their constructive comments on the manuscript; and Sarah D. Hile and Jamie Higgins for document production. Contract support was provided by Consolidated Safety Service, Inc. under NOAA Contract No. DG133C07NC0616. The covers for this document were designed and created by Gini Kennedy (NOAA). Cover photos were provided by St. Thomas Fishermen’s Association (far left photo in banner on front cover) and NOAA NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment’s Biogeography Branch (all other photos).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Techniques to Reduce the Bycatch of Threatened Marine Animals
    PAPER Fishing Techniques to Reduce the Bycatch of Threatened Marine Animals AUTHORS ABSTRACT Timothy Werner Unintended injuries and fatalities to non-target marine species—a major component of Scott Kraus “bycatch”—is one of the principal threats to the survival of many endangered marine New England Aquarium populations and species. This paper describes both proposed and existing fishing tech- Andrew Read niques for reducing non-target species bycatch, and reviews their focus across different Duke University fisheries and wildlife groups. The intent of this inventory was to gain a better understanding of the range of techniques available and to highlight priorities for research and develop- Erika Zollett ment. In all, 55 techniques were identified, with the majority directed at reducing bycatch in University of New Hampshire longline fisheries, and intended to benefit primarily seabirds, sea turtles, and small mam- mals. Bycatch reduction is a dynamic field with many examples of effective techniques, though some underserved fisheries and wildlife groups should receive more attention. Introduction illions of dollars are spent each year Methodology some techniques mainly used in aquaculture in the research and development of fishing We attempted to document all available operations became part of the final list. Mtechniques to reduce unintended injuries and information on fishing techniques that have Generally, in categorizing bycatch reduc- fatalities to non-target marine species that forms been used to reduce non-target wildlife spe- tion
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Fish Aggregating Devices in the Pacific
    The benefits of fish aggregating devices in the Pacific Michael Sharp Fisheries Development Officer (Economics) Nearshore Fisheries Development Section, Coastal Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community. Email: [email protected] Introduction important to recognise that FADs provide an array of benefits. Anderson and Gates (1996) define the benefits Fish aggregating devices (FADs) are widely used in Pa- of FADs as follows. cific Island countries and territories (PICTs) as a means to improve fisheries production in oceanic and, more Increased fishery production – Due to the aggregating recently, inshore fisheries. Traditional FADs have been phenomenon of FADs, they are known to increase catch used since the early 1900s, when Indonesian and Filipi- per unit of effort (CPUE), which allows for increased no fishermen used floating rafts of bamboo to aggregate access to protein or saleable product. Increased produc- schools of fish. Recent developments in and experimen- tion plays an important role in food security at the sub- tation with modern FAD design, deployment site, and sistence level while allowing for increased revenue in the deployment depth has occurred throughout the Pacific commercial sector. Detolle et al (1998) claim that catch- as a means to improve yields of and access to artisanal es at Reunion Island increased by 143% over a period of fish stocks. eight years subsequent to the deployment of FADs. Significant government capital and human resources Reduced pressure on reef resources – Factors such have been allocated to the fabrication, deployment and as modern fishing gear and techniques, increasing maintenance of FADs, and training of fishermen in FAD population, exports, and tourism — to name a few — are fishing techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline for Spearfishing Study Writeup
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-PIFSC-31 March 2012 The Sociocultural Importance of Spearfishing in Hawaiʻi Brent W. Stoffle and Stewart D. Allen Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce About this document The mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment and to conserve and manage coastal and oceanic marine resources and habitats to help meet our Nation’s economic, social, and environmental needs. As a branch of NOAA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) conducts or sponsors research and monitoring programs to improve the scientific basis for conservation and management decisions. NMFS strives to make information about the purpose, methods, and results of its scientific studies widely available. NMFS’ Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center (PIFSC) uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS series to achieve timely dissemination of scientific and technical information that is of high quality but inappropriate for publication in the formal peer- reviewed literature. The contents are of broad scope, including technical workshop proceedings, large data compilations, status reports and reviews, lengthy scientific or statistical monographs, and more. NOAA Technical Memoranda published by the PIFSC, although informal, are subjected to extensive review and editing and reflect sound professional work. Accordingly, they may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. A NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS issued by the PIFSC may be cited using the following format: Stoffle, B. W., and S. D. Allen. 2012. The sociocultural importance of spearfishing in Hawai`i.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Fishing: Tackle and Techniques
    S E C T I O N INTERMEDIATE5 FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES You’ve mastered fishing with spin-casting gear. What’s next? Plenty! You’re ready to explore a wide variety of other gear, from spinning and bait-casting equipment, to fly rods that can cast the tiniest of flies. Master one or try them all. This chapter will help get you started. Beginners’ Guide to Freshwater Fishing 41 INTERMEDIATE FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES COMPARING “SPIN-CASTING” TO “SPINNING” GEAR While spin-casting gear is fine for catching smaller fish, many people like to learn how to use spinning gear, which is used to catch everything from little panfish to lunker pike. Spinning reels are different from spin-casting reels Advantages of spinning reels compared to spin- in several ways: casting reels: • They are open-faced (no spool cover). • They typically have a better drag system. • They have a bail and line guide instead of a • They hold more line. casting pushbutton. • They make casting lightweight lures and baits easier. • They mount under the rod (instead of on top). Spinning rods are different from spin-casting rods Disadvantages of spinning reels compared to spin- in several ways: casting reels: • They have larger line guides mounted on the • They cost more. underside instead of the top of the rod. • They sometimes have annoying line twist, requiring that • They have a much wider range of lengths and rod you remove the line and respool the reel. action (how flexible a rod is). Line roller Bail Reel foot Drag Reel handle Spool Anti-reverse 42 Beginners’ Guide to Freshwater Fishing INTERMEDIATE FISHING: TACKLE AND TECHNIQUES HOW TO USE SPINNING GEAR Casting 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (Fads) for Artisanal Fisheries Advisory Note
    Advisory note Anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) for Artisanal Fisheries This advisory note was written to provide guidance to fisheries managers and fishers on the importance of proper planning and implementation of artisanal Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) programmes using anchored FADs for livelihoods and food security. What are FADs? FADs are drifting or anchored buoys or rafts that attract and aggregate pelagic fish, making them easier to find and catch. Fishers have long known that fish congregate around naturally occurring floating objects such as logs or a dead whale and that by mimicking this effect fish aggregation could be exploited. FADs do not increase the abundance of fish, but only redistribute them into a smaller area. It is also important to note that drifting FADs and anchored FADs have quite different uses, impacts, and management concerns. Today there are thousands of FADs in use worldwide for industrial handline, purse seine, and pole and line fisheries. There are three basic designs for anchored FADs – the spar buoy and the Indian Ocean FAD as well as the far A bamboo payao FAD, more common artisanal FADs made from local common to much of Asia materials such as bamboo and coconut fronds. © Secretariat of the Pacific Community The benefits of anchored FADs Risks and precautions Enhanced food security Anchored FADs are an important tool for the Anchored FAD programmes development of sustainable artisanal and small-scale can be expensive commercial fisheries that provide food and livelihoods The materials, the running costs for survey and to coastal communities in developing countries. FADs deployment vessels, as well as monitoring and make a valuable contribution towards food security by maintenance costs can range from USD 2,000 to helping meet increasing demand for fish influenced by USD 4,000 per FAD.
    [Show full text]