DOCSLIB.ORG

Shoreline Analysis Report for Skagit County, Hamilton, and Lyman

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shoreline Analysis Report for Skagit County, Hamilton, and Lyman DRAFT SKAGIT Shoreline Master Shoreline Analysis Report for Shorelines in COUNTY Program Skagit County and the Towns of Hamilton UPDATE and Lyman Prepared for: Skagit County Town of Lyman Town of Hamilton Grant No. 1100205 September 1 2011 DRAFT SKAGIT COUNTY GRANT NO.1100205 S H O R E L I N E A N A L Y S I S R EPORT for Shorelines in Skagit County and the Towns of Hamilton and Lyman Prepared for: Town of Lyman Skagit County PO Box 1248 Planning and Development Lyman, WA 98263 Services 1800 Continental Place Town of Hamilton Mount Vernon, WA. 98273 PO Box 528 Hamilton, WA 98255 Prepared by: August, 2011 This report was funded in part through a grant from the Washington Department of Ecology. The Watershed Company Reference Number: 090207 The Watershed Company Contact Person: Dan Nickel Printed on 30% recycled paper. Cite this document as: The Watershed Company. August 2011. DRAFT Shoreline Analysis Report for Shorelines in Skagit County and the Towns of Lyman and Hamilton. Prepared for the Skagit County Planning and Development Services Department, Mount Vernon, WA. TA B L E O F C ONTENTS Page # 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Shoreline Jurisdiction ................................................................................... 2 1.3 Study Area ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Skagit County ................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Town of Lyman ................................................................................................ 4 1.3.3 Town of Hamilton............................................................................................. 4 2 Summary of Current Regulatory Framework .......................... 5 2.1 Shoreline Management Act ........................................................................... 5 2.2 Skagit County ................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Towns of Lyman and Hamilton ..................................................................... 7 2.4 State Agencies and Regulations ................................................................... 7 2.5 Federal Regulations ....................................................................................... 9 3 Summary of County Ecosystem Conditions ......................... 12 3.1 Geographic and Ecosystem Context .......................................................... 12 3.2 Historic Geology, Topography, and Drainage Patterns ............................ 15 3.3 Major Land Use Changes and Current Shoreline Condition ..................... 18 4 Shoreline Inventory ................................................................. 25 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Inventory Data Summary, Assumptions, Limitations, and Data Gaps ..... 27 4.2.1 Management Unit Determination ................................................................. 28 4.2.2 Land Use Patterns ......................................................................................... 28 4.2.3 Current Land Use........................................................................................... 30 4.2.4 Future Land Use ............................................................................................ 33 4.2.5 Existing Skagit County Shoreline Master Program Designations ............ 35 4.2.6 Transportation ............................................................................................... 36 4.2.7 Utilities ............................................................................................................ 37 4.2.8 Impervious Surfaces ..................................................................................... 38 4.2.9 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 38 4.2.10 Shoreline Modifications ................................................................................ 38 i 4.2.11 Existing and Potential Public Access ......................................................... 39 4.2.12 Geologically Hazardous Areas ..................................................................... 41 4.2.13 Frequently Flooded Areas ............................................................................ 41 4.2.14 Wetlands ......................................................................................................... 41 4.2.15 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas ............................................ 42 4.2.16 Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas .................................................................. 42 4.2.17 Historical or Archaeological Sites ............................................................... 42 4.2.18 Water Quality .................................................................................................. 43 4.3 Management Unit Conditions...................................................................... 44 4.3.1 Management Unit 1- Samish River............................................................... 55 4.3.2 Management Unit 2- Samish Island, Padilla Bay, and East Side of Swinomish Channel ..................................................................................... 58 4.3.3 Management Unit 3- Swinomish Tribal Reservation .................................. 62 4.3.4 Management Unit 4- Fidalgo Island and Other Islands.............................. 65 4.3.5 Management Unit 5- Skagit Bay/Delta ......................................................... 71 4.3.6 Management Unit 6- Lower Skagit Diking Districts ................................... 74 4.3.7 Management Unit 7- Samish River............................................................... 79 4.3.8 Management Unit 8- Middle Skagit River .................................................... 82 4.3.9 Management Unit 9- Upper Skagit River ..................................................... 86 4.3.10 Management Unit 10- Nooksack Watershed ............................................... 93 4.3.11 Management Unit 11- Stillaguamish Watershed ........................................ 95 5 Reach-scale Functions and Processes ................................. 98 5.1 Functional Evaluation Approach, Rationale and Limitations ................... 98 5.1.1 Reach Delineation.......................................................................................... 98 5.1.2 Functions and Impairments ........................................................................ 100 5.1.3 Limitations .................................................................................................... 106 5.2 Management Unit Functional Evaluation ................................................. 107 5.2.1 Samish Bay .................................................................................................. 107 5.2.2 Samish Island, Padilla Bay, and East Side of Swinomish Channel ........ 108 5.2.3 Swinomish Tribal Reservation ................................................................... 111 5.2.4 Fidalgo Island and Other Islands ............................................................... 115 5.2.5 Skagit Bay/Delta........................................................................................... 121 5.2.6 Lower Skagit- Diking Districts .................................................................... 127 5.2.7 Samish River ................................................................................................ 131 5.2.8 Middle Skagit ................................................................................................ 135 5.2.9 Upper Skagit (WRIA 4) ................................................................................ 141 5.2.10 Nooksack (WRIA 1) ...................................................................................... 157 5.2.11 Stillaguamish (WRIA 5) ............................................................................... 160 6 Land Use Analysis and Implications ................................... 164 ii 6.1 Shoreline Land Capacity Analysis ............................................................ 164 6.1.1 Land Capacity Analysis .............................................................................. 164 6.1.2 Potential Use Conflicts ............................................................................... 169 6.1.3 Samish Bay .................................................................................................. 169 6.1.4 Samish Island, Padilla Bay, and East Side of Swinomish Channel ........ 170 6.1.5 Swinomish Tribal Reservation ................................................................... 171 6.1.6 Fidalgo Island and Other Islands ............................................................... 172 6.1.7 Skagit Bay/Delta........................................................................................... 173 6.1.8 Lower Skagit Diking District ....................................................................... 173 6.1.9 Samish River ................................................................................................ 174 6.1.10 Middle Skagit ................................................................................................ 175 6.1.11 Upper Skagit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North: Lummi, Nooksack, Samish, Sauk-Suiattle, Stillaguamish
    Policy 7.01 Implementation Plan Region 2 North (R2N) Community Services Division (CSD) Serving the following Tribes: Lummi Nation, Nooksack Indian Tribe, Samish Indian Nation, Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Swinomish Tribal Community, Tulalip Tribes, & Upper Skagit Indian Tribe Biennium Timeframe: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Revised 04/2021 Annual Key Due Dates: April 1st - CSD Regional Administrators submit 7.01 Plan and Progress Reports (PPRs) to CSD HQ Coordinator. April 13th – CSD HQ Coordinator will submit Executive Summary & 7.01 PPRs to the ESA Office of Assistant Secretary for final review. April 23rd - ESA Office of the Assistant Secretary will send all 7.01 PPRs to Office of Indian Policy (OIP). 7.01 Meetings: January 17th- Cancelled due to inclement weather Next scheduled meeting April 17th, hosted by the Nooksack Indian Tribe. 07/07/20 Virtual 7.01 meeting. 10/16/20 7.01 Virtual meeting 01/15/21 7.01 Virtual 04/16/21 7.01 Virtual 07/16/21 7.01 Virtual Implementation Plan Progress Report Status Update for the Fiscal Year Goals/Objectives Activities Expected Outcome Lead Staff and Target Date Starting Last July 1 Revised 04/2021 Page 1 of 27 1. Work with tribes Lead Staff: to develop Denise Kelly 08/16/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by services, local [email protected] , Tulalip Tribes agreements, and DSHS/CSD Tribal Liaison Memorandums of 10/18/2019 North 7.01 Meeting hosted by Understanding Dan Story, DSHS- Everett (MOUs) that best [email protected] meet the needs of Community Relations 01/17/2020 North 7.01 Meeting Region 2’s Administrator/CSD/ESA scheduled to be hosted by Upper Skagit American Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of the Wildlife Society
    Page | 1 The WashingtonTHE WASHINGTON WILDLIFER Wildlifer FALL 2016 Newsletter of the Washington Chapter of The Wildlife Society MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT meeting. During the banquet at the annual meeting each year Danielle Munzing we give out awards to biologists, organizations, and landowners. The last couple of years I have been involved Happy Fall, Wildlife Society with WA-TWS, I have been surprised that we haven’t members! Time for wool socks, a hot received more nominations. Last month during our board drink in the thermos, and dark skies at meeting, I asked everyone to do some homework and I would 1630. Across Washington, wildlife like to ask the same of each of you. biologists will be busy with their winter work, whether it’s surveying Do you know someone who deserves to be recognized? big game, writing reports, or planning Consider nominating that person for the 2017 awards season. the 2017 annual conference. That’s right, your Washington There are EIGHT different awards available from the Chapter is hard at work with the Washington State Society of Chapter. American Foresters to bring you an incredible 4 days of I think many of us know someone who: workshops, speaker sessions, delicious food, and opportunities to socialize and network. All of this will be Does more than they need to taking place in the heart of Central Washington, at the Red Makes valuable and unique contributions to wildlife Lion Hotel and Convention Center in Yakima. The theme for conservation this year is Forests and Wildlife: Responding to Change. Uses foresight to address problems early As you can imagine, there will be a lot to talk about and we Shows their dedication are bringing together experts in both forestry and wildlife to Shows exceptional leadership inspire discussions ranging from white-nose syndrome to Established partnerships that would not have existed forest health and ecological integrity and so much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Records and Thoughts by Evelyn Hopley Clift, 1964
    Samish and Vendovia Islands : Records and Thoughts by Evelyn Hopley Clift, 1964 Samish Island Early Settlers It is much too late to learn the story of Samish Islands early history from the lips of the first pioneers. They are gone as are the Indians who once made the Island home, or an important rendezvous. But I have pieced together from the family Bible, old letters, several newspaper clippings of long ago and personal interviews with grandsons what tells a little part of those early days. I pass it on humbly, filled with awe at the courage, fortitude, strength and kindliness of the particular pioneer woman I found. Time and the humid climate have all but erased the signs which tell us that here was a white man's first crude cabin or there an Indian's smoky long-house. The clearings, so laboriously made, remain . greatly extended by tractor and bulldozer. Roads that are wide and smooth today were once native trails, then narrow pathways and wagon roads. Occasionally one comes upon a bit of orchard long forgotten, a portion of rotting rail fence, a wagon wheel, pestles, weights the natives used to anchor their nets, arrow heads, a lonely grave. One of the earliest settlements by white men in what is today Skagit County was on Samish Island. Projecting westward from the Samish River flats into the deep waters of Padilla and Samish Bays, the island is just over 3 miles long and 3/4 mile wide. It was originally separated from the mainland by Siwash Slough, so called for the 2000 or so Siwash who had their long-house there and hunted and fished these waters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation
    Testimony of Tom Wooten, Chairman, Samish Indian Nation House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Legislative Hearing on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017 November 15, 2017 Introduction Good morning Chairman LaMalfa, Ranking Member Torres, and Members of the Subcommittee. My name is Tom Wooten, Chairman of the Samish Indian Nation (“Tribe”), a federally recognized Indian tribe based in Anacortes, Washington, in the San Juan Islands. The Tribe is comprised of approximately 1,500 citizens. Thank you for this opportunity to testify today on H.R. 2320, the Samish Indian Nation Land Conveyance Act of 2017. H.R. 2320 would provide our Tribe with a small land base that will enable our tribal government to provide basic services to our citizens, address tribal government administrative needs, and give the Samish people more opportunities to participate in our traditional ways of life. On behalf of the Tribe, I extend our tremendous thanks to Congressman Rick Larsen for introducing H.R. 2320. This is the third time Rep. Larsen has introduced this bill. Our quest to obtain a land base for our people has been an extremely long and difficult road, and we greatly appreciate his commitment to assist the Samish Nation in rebuilding our community. I also want to thank Anacortes Mayor Laurie Gere and the City Council of Anacortes for their support and partnership, and for working with us over the past 14 years under a memorandum of agreement for mutual cooperation. I also would like to thank San Juan County Chair Rick Hughes and the County Board, Skagit County Chair Ron Wesen and County Commissioners, as well as our local state delegation for their support of H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51
    Central Washington University ScholarWorks@CWU All Master's Theses Master's Theses Summer 2017 Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51 Sherri M. Middleton Central Washington University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Middleton, Sherri M., "Comparing a Surface Collection to an Excavated Collection in the Lower Skagit River Delta at 45SK51" (2017). All Master's Theses. 711. https://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/etd/711 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses at ScholarWorks@CWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@CWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARING A SURFACE COLLECTION TO AN EXCAVATED COLLECTION IN THE LOWER SKAGIT RIVER DELTA AT 45SK51 ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ________________________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Cultural and Environmental Resource Management _______________________________________________________________________ by Sherri Michelle Middleton June 2017 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Island County Whatcom County Skagit County Snohomish County
    F ir C re ek Lake Samish k Governors Point e re C k es e n e Lawrence Point O r Ba r y Reed Lake C s t e n Fragrance Lake r a i C n Whiskey Rock r n e F a m e r W h a t c o m r W k i Eliza Island d B a y Cain Lake C r e B e Squires Lake t y k k n e North Pea u y pod o n t C u e Doe Bay C o Carter Poin a t r e Doe Bay C r r e C e k r e v South Peapod l Doe Island i S Sinclair Island Urban Towhead Island Vendovi Island Rosario Strait ek Cre Deer Point ll ha Eagle Cliff ite Pelican Beach h W k e Colony Creek e Samish Bay r Obstruction Pass ler C But D Blanchard r y P C a r H r e Clark Point a k s r e r e o William Point i k s k e n Tide Point o e r n e r C C C s r e e Cyp Jack Island d e ress Island l Cypress Lake i k Colony W C ree k Fish Point Blakely Island Samish Island Indian Village Cypress Head Scotts Point Strawberry Island Deepwater Bay n Slough Strawberry Island Guemes Island Padilla Bay Edison SloEudgihso Edison Swede C r Cypress Island e ek Blakely Island Guemes Island Black Rock Cypress Island Reef Point Guemes Island Armitage Island Huckleber ry SIsaladnddlebag Island Dot Island Southeast Point reek Guemes s C a Kellys Point m o h T Fauntleroy Point Hat Island W ish Ri i ll Sam ver ard Creek Cap Sante Decatur Hea Jamdes Island k Shannon Point Anacortes Cree Cannery Lake rd ya ck ri Sunset Beach B Green P oint Jo White Cliff e Le ar y Belle Rock Slo Fidalgo Head Crandall Spit ugh Anaco Beach Weaverling Spit Bay View March Point Burrows Island Fidalgo Young Island Alexander Beach Heart Lake Allan Island Whitmarsh Junction Rosario
    [Show full text]
  • Section II Community Profile
    Section II: Community Profile Section II Community Profile Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update 9 [this page intentionally left blank] 10 Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010 Update Section II: Community Profile Community Profile Disclaimer: The Tulalip Tribes Tribal/State Hazard Mitigation Plan covers all the people, property, infrastructure and natural environment within the exterior boundaries of the Tulalip Reservation as established by the Point Elliott Treaty of January 22, 1855 and by Executive Order of December 23, 1873, as well as any property owned by the Tulalip Tribes outside of this area. Furthermore the Plan covers the Tulalip Tribes Usual and Accustom Fishing areas (U&A) as determined by Judge Walter E. Craig in United States of America et. al., plaintiffs v. State of Washington et. al., defendant, Civil 9213 Phase I, Sub Proceeding 80-1, “In Re: Tulalip Tribes’ Request for Determination of Usual and Accustom Fishing Places.” This planning scope does not limit in any way the Tulalip Tribes’ hazard mitigation and emergency management planning concerns or influence. This section will provide detailed information on the history, geography, climate, land use, population and economy of the Tulalip Tribes and its Reservation. Tulalip Reservation History Archaeologists and historians estimate that Native Americans arrived from Siberia via the Bering Sea land bridge beginning 17,000 to 11,000 years ago in a series of migratory waves during the end of the last Ice Age. Indians in the region share a similar cultural heritage based on a life focused on the bays and rivers of Puget Sound. Throughout the Puget Sound region, While seafood was a mainstay of the native diet, cedar trees were the most important building material.there were Cedar numerous was used small to tribesbuild both that subsistedlonghouses on and salmon, large halibut,canoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacortes Museum Research Files
    Last Revision: 10/02/2019 1 Anacortes Museum Research Files Key to Research Categories Category . Codes* Agriculture Ag Animals (See Fn Fauna) Arts, Crafts, Music (Monuments, Murals, Paintings, ACM Needlework, etc.) Artifacts/Archeology (Historic Things) Ar Boats (See Transportation - Boats TB) Boat Building (See Business/Industry-Boat Building BIB) Buildings: Historic (Businesses, Institutions, Properties, etc.) BH Buildings: Historic Homes BHH Buildings: Post 1950 (Recommend adding to BHH) BPH Buildings: 1950-Present BP Buildings: Structures (Bridges, Highways, etc.) BS Buildings, Structures: Skagit Valley BSV Businesses Industry (Fidalgo and Guemes Island Area) Anacortes area, general BI Boat building/repair BIB Canneries/codfish curing, seafood processors BIC Fishing industry, fishing BIF Logging industry BIL Mills BIM Businesses Industry (Skagit Valley) BIS Calendars Cl Census/Population/Demographics Cn Communication Cm Documents (Records, notes, files, forms, papers, lists) Dc Education Ed Engines En Entertainment (See: Ev Events, SR Sports, Recreation) Environment Env Events Ev Exhibits (Events, Displays: Anacortes Museum) Ex Fauna Fn Amphibians FnA Birds FnB Crustaceans FnC Echinoderms FnE Fish (Scaled) FnF Insects, Arachnids, Worms FnI Mammals FnM Mollusks FnMlk Various FnV Flora Fl INTERIM VERSION - PENDING COMPLETION OF PN, PS, AND PFG SUBJECT FILE REVIEW Last Revision: 10/02/2019 2 Category . Codes* Genealogy Gn Geology/Paleontology Glg Government/Public services Gv Health Hl Home Making Hm Legal (Decisions/Laws/Lawsuits) Lgl
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Public Beach List
    2021 Public Beach List - Special Rules The following is a list of popular public beaches with special rules because of resource needs and/or restrictions on harvest due to health concerns. If a beach is not listed below or on page 2, it is open for recreational harvest year-round unless closed by emergency rule, pollution or shellfish safety closures. Click for WDFW Public Beach webpages and seasons 2021 Beach Seasons adopted February 26, 2021 Open for Clams, Mussels & Oysters = Open for Oysters Only = For more information, click on beach name below to view Jan1- Jan15- Feb1- Feb15- Mar1- Mar15- Apr1- Apr15- May1- May15- Jun1- Jun15- Jul1- Jul15- Aug1- Aug15- Sep1- Sep15- Oct1- Oct15- Nov1- Nov15- Dec1- Dec15- beach-specific webpage. Jan15 Jan31 Feb15 Feb28 Mar15 Mar31 Apr15 Apr30 May15 May31 Jun15 Jun30 Jul15 Jul31 Aug15 Aug31 Sep15 Sep30 Oct15 Oct31 Nov15 Nov30 Dec15 Dec31 Ala Spit No natural production of oysters Belfair State Park Birch Bay State Park Dash Point State Park Dosewallips State Park Drayton West Duckabush Dungeness Spit/NWR Tidelands No natural production of oysters Eagle Creek Fort Flagler State Park Freeland County Park No natural production of oysters. Frye Cove County Park Hope Island State Park Illahee State Park Limited natural production of clams Indian Island County Park No natural production of oysters Kitsap Memorial State Park CLAMS AND OYSTERS CLOSED Kopachuck State Park Mystery Bay State Park Nahcotta Tidelands (Willapa Bay) North Bay Oak Bay County Park CLAMS AND OYSTERS CLOSED Penrose Point State Park Point
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Meeting
    MEETING SUMMARY IRTPO TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE November 8, 2018 Member Attendance List Members not in Attendance Pete Schrum, Island Transit Don Meehan, District 1 Citizen Rep. Connie Bowers, Island County Public Works Alex Warner, City of Oak Harbor Cac Kamak, City of Oak Harbor Christine Boswell-Still, District 2 Citizen Rep. Bob Monize, District 3 Citizen Rep. Beverly Mesa-Zendt, Island County Planning Stan Berryman, City of Langley Ports Representative Elizabeth Sjostrom, WSDOT Brian Tyhuis, NAS Whidbey Island Facilitator Sharon Sappington, Island County EDC Brian Wood, IRTPO Staff Owen Dennison, Town of Coupeville Other Attendees Thera Black Jack Lynch, Clinton Community Council Nick Pinch, Island Transit Stacy Clauson, WSDOT Public Transportation Ronald Still, citizen (Navy employee) Mehrdad Moini, WSDOT Local Programs Meeting began at 1:00 PM Action Items: Prepare draft Bylaws revisions Bring transportation funding presentation to TAC Capture elements of RTP conversation and bring them to the IRTPO Board Actions: Summary from July meeting was approved Updates: IRTPO developments from October TAC meeting were reviewed: The EB cancelled its December meeting. The EB approved the 2019 Regional Transportation Improvement Program and the projects were sent to WSDOT for inclusion in the STIP. o Sponsors will be able to obligate those projects in January. If a project is in the 2018 STIP, sponsors can still obligate this year (but, will be using 2019 funds). The Board approved the consolidated grant rankings/gradings from the Transportation Equity Committee and these were forwarded to WSDOT Public Transportation. o It was noted that the County Connector transit service was among the top ranked.
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan Under Limit 6 of the 4(D) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
    Final Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment to Analyze Impacts of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Consideration of the Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan under Limit 6 of the 4(d) Rule of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Prepared by the National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region April 2018 Cover Sheet Final Environmental Assessment Title of Environmental Review: Skagit River Steelhead Fishery Resource Management Plan (Skagit RMP) Distinct Population Segments: Puget Sound Steelhead DPS Responsible Agency and Official: Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Building 1 Seattle, Washington 98115 Contacts: James Dixon Sustainable Fisheries Division National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 103 Lacey, Washington 98503 Legal Mandate: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended and implemented – 50 CFR Part 223 Location of Proposed Activities: Skagit River Basin including Skagit Bay and Mainstem Skagit River in Puget Sound, Washington Activity Considered: The proposed resource management plan includes steelhead fisheries and associated activities in the Skagit Basin 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose Of And Need For The Proposed Action 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Description of the Proposed Action 13 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Action 16 1.4 Project Area and Analysis Area 16 1.5 Relationship to Other Plans, Regulations, Agreements, Laws, Secretarial Orders and Executive Orders 18 1.5.1 North of Falcon Process 18 1.5.2 Executive Order 12898 18 1.5.3 Treaty of Point Elliot 19 1.5.4 United States v.
    [Show full text]