OFM Code County/District
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Population Francophone De L'ontario Par Subdivision De Recensement
Population francophone de l'Ontario par subdivision de recensement Population % de Municipalité (Subdivision de recensement) Population totale francophone francophones Abitibi 70 IRI 01900 145 5 3.4% Addington Highlands TP 00000 2,260 40 1.8% Adelaide-Metcalfe TP 00000 2,985 25 0.8% Adjala-Tosorontio TP 00000 10,970 170 1.5% Admaston/Bromley TP 00000 2,935 50 1.7% Ajax T 00000 119,215 2,525 2.1% Akwesasne (Part) 59 IRI 03300 1,470 20 1.4% Alberton TP 00000 965 15 1.6% Alderville First Nation IRI 01200 495 10 2.0% Alfred and Plantagenet TP 00000 9,550 7,440 77.9% Algoma 20000 112,725 7,595 6.7% Algoma, Unorganized, North Part NO 00000 5,740 315 5.5% Algonquin Highlands TP 00100 2,355 30 1.3% Alnwick/Haldimand TP 00000 6,860 95 1.4% Amaranth TP 00000 4,075 50 1.2% Amherstburg T 00000 21,770 715 3.3% Armour TP 00000 1,410 35 2.5% Armstrong TP 00000 1,170 695 59.4% Arnprior T 00000 8,610 400 4.6% Aroland 83 IRI 02300 365 0 0.0% Arran-Elderslie MU 00000 6,740 30 0.4% Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh TP 00000 5,420 40 0.7% Asphodel-Norwood TP 00000 3,990 45 1.1% Assiginack TP 00100 1,015 45 4.4% Athens TP 00000 2,955 65 2.2% Atikokan T 00000 2,705 85 3.1% Attawapiskat 91A IRI 03300 1,500 5 0.3% Augusta TP 00000 7,340 270 3.7% Aurora T 00000 54,955 1,100 2.0% Aylmer T 00000 7,425 40 0.5% Baldwin TP 00000 620 105 16.9% Bancroft T 00000 3,770 60 1.6% Barrie CY 00000 140,090 3,715 2.7% Bayham MU 00000 7,400 65 0.9% Bear Island 1 IRI 01900 150 0 0.0% Bearskin Lake IRI 01100 355 0 0.0% Beckwith TP 00000 7,645 460 6.0% Belleville CY 00000 49,885 930 1.9% -
POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit
POPULATION PROFILE 2006 Census Porcupine Health Unit Kapuskasing Iroquois Falls Hearst Timmins Porcupine Cochrane Moosonee Hornepayne Matheson Smooth Rock Falls Population Profile Foyez Haque, MBBS, MHSc Public Health Epidemiologist published by: Th e Porcupine Health Unit Timmins, Ontario October 2009 ©2009 Population Profile - 2006 Census Acknowledgements I would like to express gratitude to those without whose support this Population Profile would not be published. First of all, I would like to thank the management committee of the Porcupine Health Unit for their continuous support of and enthusiasm for this publication. Dr. Dennis Hong deserves a special thank you for his thorough revision. Thanks go to Amanda Belisle for her support with editing, creating such a wonderful cover page, layout and promotion of the findings of this publication. I acknowledge the support of the Statistics Canada for history and description of the 2006 Census and also the definitions of the variables. Porcupine Health Unit – 1 Population Profile - 2006 Census 2 – Porcupine Health Unit Population Profile - 2006 Census Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 1 Preface . 5 Executive Summary . 7 A Brief History of the Census in Canada . 9 A Brief Description of the 2006 Census . 11 Population Pyramid. 15 Appendix . 31 Definitions . 35 Table of Charts Table 1: Population distribution . 12 Table 2: Age and gender characteristics. 14 Figure 3: Aboriginal status population . 16 Figure 4: Visible minority . 17 Figure 5: Legal married status. 18 Figure 6: Family characteristics in Ontario . 19 Figure 7: Family characteristics in Porcupine Health Unit area . 19 Figure 8: Low income cut-offs . 20 Figure 11: Mother tongue . -
(De Beers, Or the Proponent) Has Identified a Diamond
VICTOR DIAMOND PROJECT Comprehensive Study Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview and Background De Beers Canada Inc. (De Beers, or the Proponent) has identified a diamond resource, approximately 90 km west of the First Nation community of Attawapiskat, within the James Bay Lowlands of Ontario, (Figure 1-1). The resource consists of two kimberlite (diamond bearing ore) pipes, referred to as Victor Main and Victor Southwest. The proposed development is called the Victor Diamond Project. Appendix A is a corporate profile of De Beers, provided by the Proponent. Advanced exploration activities were carried out at the Victor site during 2000 and 2001, during which time approximately 10,000 tonnes of kimberlite were recovered from surface trenching and large diameter drilling, for on-site testing. An 80-person camp was established, along with a sample processing plant, and a winter airstrip to support the program. Desktop (2001), Prefeasibility (2002) and Feasibility (2003) engineering studies have been carried out, indicating to De Beers that the Victor Diamond Project (VDP) is technically feasible and economically viable. The resource is valued at 28.5 Mt, containing an estimated 6.5 million carats of diamonds. De Beers’ current mineral claims in the vicinity of the Victor site are shown on Figure 1-2. The Proponent’s project plan provides for the development of an open pit mine with on-site ore processing. Mining and processing will be carried out at an approximate ore throughput of 2.5 million tonnes/year (2.5 Mt/a), or about 7,000 tonnes/day. Associated project infrastructure linking the Victor site to Attawapiskat include the existing south winter road and a proposed 115 kV transmission line, and possibly a small barge landing area to be constructed in Attawapiskat for use during the project construction phase. -
Final Report on Facilitated Community Sessions March 2020
FINAL REPORT ON FACILITATED COMMUNITY SESSIONS MARCH 2020 MCLEOD WOOD ASSOCIATES INC. #201-160 St David St. S., Fergus, ON N1M 2L3 phone: 519 787 5119 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups Contents The New Community – a Five Step Process .................................................................................... 2 Background: ................................................................................................................................ 2 Steps Leading to Relocation: ................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Steps Two and Three .......................................................................................... 4 Summary of the Focus Group Discussions: ............................................................................. 5 Appendix One: Notes from Moose Factory Meeting held November 26 2019…………………………17 Appendix Two: Notes from Moosonee Meeting held November 28 2019………………………………23 1 Selection of a Preferred Location for the New Community Table Summarizing Comments from Focus Groups The New Community – a Five Step Process Background: The MoCreebec Council of the Cree Nation was formed on February 6, 1980 to contend with economic and health concerns and the social housing conditions facing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) beneficiaries that lived in Moose Factory and Moosonee. The JBNQA beneficiaries were mainly registered with three principal bands -
Rank of Pops
Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675 -
Official Plan of the Hearst Planning Area 2017
OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE HEARST PLANNING AREA March 2017 Official Plan of the Hearst Planning Area 2017 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE HEARST PLANNING AREA March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents i – vii List of Schedules viii-ix List of Amendments x 1. TITLE AND COMPONENTS 1 2. PURPOSE OF THE PLAN 2 3. BASIS OF THE PLAN 3 4. GENERAL POLICIES 6 4.1 APPLICATION 6 4.2 GENERAL STATEMENT 6 4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 6 4.4 TERRITORIES WITHOUT MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION 7 4.5 TERRITORIES WITH MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION 7 4.6 INFILLING 7 4.7 EXISTING USES 7 4.8 NON-CONFORMING USES 8 4.9 MOBILE HOMES 9 4.10 WAYSIDE PITS, QUARRIES, PORTABLE ASPHALT AND 9 CONCRETE PLANTS 4.11 CONTAMINATED LANDS 9 4.12 PERMITS, APPROVALS AND UTILITIES 10 4.13 STATUTORY AUTHORITIES 10 5. STRATEGIC POLICIES 11 5.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT POLICIES 11 5.1.1 PLANNING STRUCTURE FOR THE HEARST 11 PLANNING AREA 5.1.1.1 Policy Objectives 11 5.1.1.2 Strategic Policies 11 5.1.2 PROJECTED TWENTY-YEAR POPULATION (2016- 14 2036) 5.1.2.1 Policy Objectives 14 i Official Plan of the Hearst Planning Area 2017 5.1.2.2 Strategic Policies 14 5.1.3 HOUSING DEMAND AND SUPPLY 14 5.1.3.1 Policy Objectives 14 5.1.3.2 Strategic Policies 15 5.1.4 FOCUS ON URBAN CENTRES 19 5.1.4.1 Policy Objectives 19 5.1.4.2 Strategic Policies 19 5.2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICIES 20 5.2.1 POLICY OBJECTIVES 20 5.2.2 STRATEGY TARGETS 22 5.2.3 STRATEGY BALANCE 22 5.2.4 COUNCIL LEADERSHIP 22 5.2.5 STRATEGIC POLICIES 24 5.2.6 HOME-BASED BUSINESS POLICIES 26 5.3 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT POLICIES 28 5.3.1 POLICY OBJECTIVES 28 5.3.2 -
3 Septembre 2020 - 2,50 $ Taxe Incluse on Relance Les Opérations Au Centre Récréatif Claude-Larose
LAvecL’’IINN SteveFFOO SS McOOU UInnisSS LLAA LLOOUUPPEE Tous les vendredis Présenté par la : de 11 h à 13 h Vol. 45 Nº 22 Hearst ON - Jeudi 3 septembre 2020 - 2,50 $ taxe incluse On relance les opérations au Centre récréatif Claude-Larose Page 3 La rentrée scolaire Le CAH lance la Visite à la Ferme au CSCDGR saison 2020-2021 Pure & Simple Page 2 Pages 8 et 9 Page 14 PROFITEZ DU MEILLEUR PRIX DE L’ANNÉE ! 2020 ECOSPORT TITANIUM 4X4 POUR SEULEMENT Sièges chauffants en cuir, toit * $ ouvrant, navigation GPS, sièges * $ électriques, FordPass, caméra, et 174,99174,99 encore plus !!! + TVH aux deux semaines On a 4 Titanium en inventaire plus 0 $ comptant WOW !!! 6 autres modèles pour un total de 10 !!! 888 362-4011 Hearst • 888 335-8553 Kapuskasing * Location 48 mois @ 1,49 % Lecoursmotorsales.ca EXCLUSIVEMENT PENDANT AOUT ET SEPTEMBRE 2 LEJOURNALLENORD.COM | JEUDI 3 SEPTEMBRE 2020 Rentrée scolaire au Conseil scolaire catholique de district des Grandes Rivières Par Awa Dembele-Yeno Les parents d’enfants inscrits à virtuelle, mais la transition supplémentaire sera aussi con- Pour toutes les questions rela- des écoles gérées par le Conseil pourrait prendre plusieurs sacré à la désinfection des écoles tives à l’horaire de la journée, scolaire catholique de district des jours, à en croire la directrice de et la conciergerie remplira un aux services de garde avant et Grandes Rivières (CSCDGR) ont l’éducation. journal de désinfection deux fois après l’école, à la réception des pu assister les 25 et 26 aout à Mme Petroski a spécifié que les par jour, selon ce qu’explique enfants transportés par leurs deux sessions virtuelles d’infor- protocoles de la COVID-19 Mme Petroski. -
Côté Gold Mine Project Environmental Assessment Report
Côté Gold Mine Project Environmental Assessment Report April 2016 Cover photo credited to IAMGOLD Corporation. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, (2016). Catalogue No: En106-150/2016E-PDF ISBN : 978-0-660-04947-2 This publication, with the exception of the cover photo and all figures, may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, and in any format, without charge or further permission. Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials, in whole or in part, for the purpose of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 or [email protected]. The copyrights for the cover photo and all figures are owned by IAMGOLD Corporation. You may not reproduce the cover photo and figures, for non-commercial or commercial purposes, without prior written permission from IAMGOLD Corporation. This document has been issued in French under the title: Projet de mine d’or Côté - Rapport d’évaluation environnementale Executive Summary IAMGOLD Corporation (the proponent) is proposing the construction, operation, decommissioning, and abandonment of the Côté Gold Mine Project (the Project), which includes an open pit gold mine, an on-site metal mill and four structures for diverting water, located 20 kilometres southwest of the community of Gogama in northeastern Ontario. The mine and metal mill would have an ore production capacity and an ore input capacity, respectively, of 60 000 tonnes per day, with a life of approximately 15 years. The four water course realignment structures would have the capacity to divert 14 271 500, 15 695 800, 17 994 500, and 13 286 000 cubic metres of water per year. -
Zone a – Prescribed Northern Zones / Zones Nordiques Visées Par Règlement Place Names Followed by Numbers Are Indian Reserves
Northern Residents Deductions – Places in Prescribed Zones / Déductions pour les habitants de régions éloignées – Endroits situés dans les zones visées par règlement Zone A – Prescribed northern zones / Zones nordiques visées par règlement Place names followed by numbers are Indian reserves. If you live in a place that is not listed in this publication and you think it is in a prescribed zone, contact us. / Les noms suivis de chiffres sont des réserves indiennes. Communiquez avec nous si l’endroit où vous habitez ne figure pas dans cette publication et que vous croyez qu’il se situe dans une zone visée par règlement. Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories / Yukon, Nunavut et Territoires du Nord-Ouest All places in the Yukon, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories are located in a prescribed northern zone. / Tous les endroits situés dans le Yukon, le Nunavut et les Territoires du Nord-Ouest se trouvent dans des zones nordiques visées par règlement. British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique Andy Bailey Recreation Good Hope Lake Nelson Forks Tahltan Liard River 3 Area Gutah New Polaris Mine Taku McDames Creek 2 Atlin Hyland Post Niteal Taku River McDonald Lake 1 Atlin Park Hyland Ranch Old Fort Nelson Tamarack Mosquito Creek 5 Atlin Recreation Area Hyland River Park Pavey Tarahne Park Muddy River 1 Bear Camp Iskut Pennington Telegraph Creek One Mile Point 1 Ben-My-Chree Jacksons Pleasant Camp Tetsa River Park Prophet River 4 Bennett Kahntah Porter Landing Toad River Salmon Creek 3 Boulder City Kledo Creek Park Prophet River Trutch Silver -
How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic
How We Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan for Superior East and Neighbouring Communities Final Strategy May 2019 Page Left Blank How we Prosper Together: Regional Economic Development Strategy Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Regional Economic Development Strategic Plan ....................................................... 9 Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 10 Background & Stakeholder Engagement .............................................................................. 13 Economic Analysis and Target Sector Assessment – Key Findings ................................................... 13 Target Sector Trends and Best Practices .......................................................................................... 14 Commercial Gap Assessment – Key Findings ................................................................................... 28 One-on-One Interviews – Key Findings ............................................................................................ 27 Random Sample Business Survey – Key Findings ............................................................................. 28 Focus Group Discussions – Key Findings .......................................................................................... 34 SOARR Assessment -
CSD Code Census Subdivision (CSD) Name 2011 Income Score
2011 Income 2011 Education 2011 Housing 2011 Labour Force 2011 CWB 2011 Global Non‐ Type of 2011 NHS CSD Code Census subdivision (CSD) name Score Score Score Activity Score Score Response Province Collectivity Population 1001105 Portugal Cove South 67 36% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 160 1001113 Trepassey 90 42 95 71 74 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 545 1001131 Renews‐Cappahayden 78 46 95 82 75 35% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 310 1001144 Aquaforte 72 31% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 90 1001149 Ferryland 78 53 94 70 74 48% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 465 1001169 St. Vincent's‐St. Stephen's‐Peter's River 81 54 94 69 74 37% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 315 1001174 Gaskiers‐Point La Haye 71 39% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 235 1001186 Admirals Beach 79 22% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 85 1001192 St. Joseph's 72 27% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 125 1001203 Division No. 1, Subd. X 76 44 91 77 72 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 495 1001228 St. Bride's 76 38 96 78 72 24% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 295 1001281 Chance Cove 74 40% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001289 Chapel Arm 79 47 92 78 74 38% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 405 1001304 Division No. 1, Subd. E 80 48 96 78 76 20% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 2990 1001308 Whiteway 80 50 93 82 76 25% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 255 1001321 Division No. 1, Subd. F 74 41 98 70 71 45% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 550 1001328 New Perlican 66 28% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 120 1001332 Winterton 78 38 95 61 68 41% Newfoundland and Labrador Non‐Aboriginal 475 1001339 Division No. -
Order No. W-P-66/11
ORDER SECTION 35, THE MINING ACT, R.S.O. 1990 ORDER NO. W-P-66/11 The SURFACE RIGHTS and MINING RIGHTS of the area highlighted in red on the attached sketch, situated in the Township of Chapleau (G-1078), in the Porcupine Mining Division, containing 150.382 hectares more or less, are hereby WITHDRAWN from prospecting, staking out, sale or lease. This area is WITHDRAWN to support the ongoing Treaty land entitlement negotiations in the Chapleau area. The withdrawal order will take effect immediately upon Ontario accepting administrative control of the identified parcel of land from Canada Saving, excepting and reserving hereto and herefrom, all other lands patented, sold, leased or otherwise alienated by the Crown at the date of this Order. Any alienated lands lying within the limits of this withdrawn area that revert to the Crown subsequent to the date of this Order will automatically be considered to be withdrawn as part of this Order. This order comes into effect upon signing. Date: May 30/2011 ORIGINAL SIGNED BY "RAY MANTHA" Ray Mantha, Assistant Deputy Minister Mines and Minerals Division Time: 10:15am. Copies: Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section, MNDMF, Sudbury Provincial Mining Recorder, MNDMF, Sudbury Provincial Lands Specialist - CLR MLC – Porcupine/Timmins STRATHEARN PANET COCHRANE TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP Chapleau 75 Chapleau 61A Duck Lake 76B Chapleau 61 Chapleau 74 Chapleau 74A 4273 Chapleau Cree Fox Lake 4281 Chapleau 74A CAOUETTE CHAPLEAU Chapleau 74A GALLAGHER TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP W-P-91/09 4320 4326 W-P-90/10 4341 CAVERLEY CHAPPISE TOWNSHIP DAOUST TOWNSHIP TOWNSHIP MNDM Surface and Mining Rights Withdrawal Areas Legend Porcupine Mining Division Withdrawal Area Highway Township Boundary Chapleau MNR Administrative District Alienations Municipal Road Lakes ± Primary Road First Nation Reserve 1:100,000.