DOCSLIB.ORG

Central African Conservation Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central African Conservation Strategy Framework Contract COM 2011 – Lot 1 Request for Services 2013/328436 - Version 1 Larger than elephants Inputs for the design of an EU strategic approach to Wildlife Conservation in Africa Volume 1 Synthesis December 2014 December 2014 Mis en oeuvre par AGRER – Ce projet est financé par l’Union Européenne Consortium B&S Inputs for the design of an EU strategic approach for wildlife conservation in Africa Final report Page 1 Volume 1 SYNOPSIS A joint patrol of Gabonese and Congolese forest guards with seized ivory in a poachers’ camp on the Ivindo River, Gabon-Congo border. Photo © Victor Mbolo - WWF Afar herdsman near the Filoha springs in Awash National Park, Ethiopia. Photo © M. Murray. Inputs for the design of an EU strategic approach to wildlife conservation in Africa Page 1 Final report Volume 1 SYNOPSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 RATIONALE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 INTRODUCTION AND SPECIAL FEATURES OF SUB SAHARAN AFRICA ................................................................. 8 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE CURRENT STUDY ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 AFRICA – ICONIC WILDLIFE CONTINENT ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 PATTERNS OF WILDLIFE DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Prioritization approaches .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING ................................................................................................................................. 11 1.5 SPECIAL FEATURES OF THE REGIONS .......................................................................................................................... 13 1.5.1 Southern Africa ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.5.2 Eastern Africa .......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.5.3 Western Africa ......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.5.4 Central Africa .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.5.5 Madagascar ............................................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.6 THE ASIA DIMENSION ................................................................................................................................................. 17 2 CONSERVATION ISSUES AND CHALLENGES ........................................................................................................... 17 2.1 LOSS OF SPECIES ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 LOSS OF ECOLOGICAL SERVICES ................................................................................................................................ 19 2.3 DIRECT THREATS ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1 Habitat loss and fragmentation ............................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.2 Overhunting and overfishing ................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.3 Illegal wildlife trafficking .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.4 Alien Invasive Species ............................................................................................................................................................ 22 2.4 DRIVERS OF THE THREATS ......................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.1 Population growth and poverty ............................................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.2 Poor governance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.3 Inadequate land tenure and local resource rights ................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.4 National and regional conflict .................................................................................................................................................. 23 2.4.5 Political indifference and lack of awareness ........................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.6 Climate change ....................................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4.7 Endemic and emerging diseases ............................................................................................................................................ 24 3 ONGOING CONSERVATION EFFORTS........................................................................................................................ 24 3.1 INTERNATIONAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORKS ............................................................................ 24 3.2 STRATEGIC APPROACHES .......................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1 Protected areas ....................................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.2 Devolution of wildlife management responsibility ................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Landscape and Transfrontier Conservation ............................................................................................................................ 27 3.2.4 Combating illegal trafficking of wildlife. ................................................................................................................................... 27 3.3 INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION PARTNERS ................................................................................................................ 27 4 LESSONS LEARNED AND PROMISING APPROACHES ............................................................................................ 28 4.1 PROTECTED AREAS ................................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Protected Areas have proved the test of time but require long term support. ........................................................................ 28 4.1.2 Governance and resourcing of PA / NRM agencies ............................................................................................................... 29 4.1.3 PA design: connectivity and the landscape approach ............................................................................................................ 29 4.1.4 Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCA) .............................................................................................................................. 29 4.1.5 Public Private Partnerships for management of PAs .............................................................................................................. 30 4.1.6 Public Private Partnerships for wildlife management in buffer zones ..................................................................................... 30 4.1.7 Monitoring and research ......................................................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 ENGAGING WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND CBNRM ................................................................................................... 33 4.3 UNDERVALUING OF ECOLOGICAL SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 34 4.4 LAW ENFORCEMENT .................................................................................................................................................. 34 4.5 WILDLIFE MIGRATION AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standards for Ruminant Sanctuaries
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Ruminant Sanctuaries Version: April 2019 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Ruminant Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................................................... 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS ............................................................................................................ 1 STANDARDS UPDATES ........................................................................................................................................... 2 RUMINANT STANDARDS ........................................................................................................................................ 2 RUMINANT HOUSING ........................................................................................................................... 2 H-1. Types of Space and Size ..................................................................................................................................... 2 H-2. Containment ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 H-3. Ground and Plantings ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 2015 David Haring, Editor & Photographer • Design by Hilliker Designs
    DLC HOSTS Colleagues FROM Madagascar DUKE ANDREA KatZ, Curator, LIVING ANIMAL COLLECTIONS LEMUR CENTER In May and June, the Duke Lemur Center discuss ways that we can collaborate further to achieve com- (DLC) had the pleasure and great honor to mon conservation goals. The discussions were expanded host two Malagasy colleagues: Eric Robso- when Eric and Bernard attended the Prosimian Taxon Advi- manitrandrasana of the Ministry of the Envi- sory Group’s annual meeting with several members of the ronment, Ecology, Oceans and Forests and DLC technician staff. As a result, in July an official “Accord Bernard Iambana, Manager of Zoo Ivoloina/ of Collaboration” between the Government of Madagascar, Conservation Manager, Madagascar Fauna and American (AZA) and European (EAZA) groups was final- Flora Group. We would like to express our ized- to promote global ex situ and in situ conservation of most heartfelt thanks to the Kris and Peter the critically endangered blue-eyed black lemur (Eulemur Norvig Family Fund for supporting this inter- flavifrons). Named on the 2012, 2013 and 2014 IUCN List of national exchange. the 25 Most Endangered Primates, this species desperately The purpose of their visit was to learn first- needs cooperative global management to survive. And as hand about the DLC’s best practices for lemur the only North American institution successfully breeding care and management. In Madagascar, Eric is blue-eyed black lemurs, the DLC stands ready to do all we the coordinator of a new government initiative possibly can. to improve husbandry standards and breeding management for hundreds of lemurs that are kept in Madagascar’s zoos and private wildlife parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Boselaphus Tragocamelus</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2008 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) David M. Leslie Jr. U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Leslie, David M. Jr., "Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)" (2008). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 723. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/723 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MAMMALIAN SPECIES 813:1–16 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) DAVID M. LESLIE,JR. United States Geological Survey, Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-3051, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Boselaphus tragocamelus (Pallas, 1766) is a bovid commonly called the nilgai or blue bull and is Asia’s largest antelope. A sexually dimorphic ungulate of large stature and unique coloration, it is the only species in the genus Boselaphus. It is endemic to peninsular India and small parts of Pakistan and Nepal, has been extirpated from Bangladesh, and has been introduced in the United States (Texas), Mexico, South Africa, and Italy. It prefers open grassland and savannas and locally is a significant agricultural pest in India. It is not of special conservation concern and is well represented in zoos and private collections throughout the world. DOI: 10.1644/813.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Affinities of the Ant Fauna of Madagascar
    Biogéographie de Madagascar, 1996: 457-465 ORIGINS AND AFFINITIES OF THE ANT FAUNA OF MADAGASCAR Brian L. FISHER Department of Entomology University of California Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.- Fifty-two ant genera have been recorded from the Malagasy region, of which 48 are estimated to be indigenous. Four of these genera are endemic to Madagascar and 1 to Mauritius. In Madagascar alone,41 out of 45 recorded genera are estimated to be indigenous. Currently, there are 318 names of described species-group taxa from Madagascar and 381 names for the Malagasy region. The ant fauna of Madagascar, however,is one of the least understoodof al1 biogeographic regions: 2/3of the ant species may be undescribed. Associated with Madagascar's long isolation from other land masses, the level of endemism is high at the species level, greaterthan 90%. The level of diversity of ant genera on the island is comparable to that of other biogeographic regions.On the basis of generic and species level comparisons,the Malagasy fauna shows greater affinities to Africathan to India and the Oriental region. Thestriking gaps in the taxonomic composition of the fauna of Madagascar are evaluatedin the context of island radiations.The lack of driver antsin Madagascar may have spurred the diversification of Cerapachyinae and may have permitted the persistenceof other relic taxa suchas the Amblyoponini. KEY W0RDS.- Formicidae, Biogeography, Madagascar, Systematics, Africa, India RESUME.- Cinquante-deux genres de fourmis, dont 48 considérés comme indigènes, sontCOMUS dans la région Malgache. Quatre d'entr'eux sont endémiques de Madagascaret un seul de l'île Maurice.
    [Show full text]
  • F I N a L CS1 31012007.Indd
    MADAGASCAR CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 1 | ISSUE 1 — DECEMBER 2006 PAGE 4 FLAGSHIPSPECIES Lemurs - Ambassadors for Madagascar Urs Thalmann I, II Anthropological Institute University Zurich-Irchel Winterthurerstrasse 190 CH–8057 Zurich, Switzerland Phone: +41 44 6354192 Fax: +41-44-635 68 04 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT animal order in Madagascar (8.1 genera/order) than on other In this short article on lemurs I give a concise introduction for continents. One order of Malagasy mammals, Bibymalagasia, is non-specialists to these conspicuous and unique animals on entirely restricted to Madagascar and went extinct only relative the island of Madagascar. recently (MacPhee 1994) along with artiodactyle pygmy hippos and other large vertebrates (Burney 2004). Within Malagasy INTRODUCTION mammals, the mammal order primates clearly stands out with Madagascar has long been known for its exquisite wildlife. It the endemic lemurs. The lemurs are the most diverse mammal has been identified as a Megadiversity country and “Hottest group on the generic level, and Madagascar is the only place Hotspot” for biodiversity conservation (Meyers et al. 2000 where primates genera are the dominant group overall. On a Mittermeier et al. 2005) due to the combination of extraordinary global scale primates rank 5th behind rodents, bats, carnivores, high diversity and extreme degree of threat. Lemurs, a natural and even - toed hoofed mammals. group of primates endemic to Madagascar, are possibly the most conspicuous and most widely known wildlife of Madagascar. In MADAGASCAR: A HOTSPOT FOR CONSERVATION this article, written for a non-specialist audience, I try to situ- A biodiversity hotspot is a region that contains at least 0.5 % ate these mammals in a wider context to shed light on (i) their (or 1,500) of the world’s 300,000 plant species as endemics and biological position and diversity, (ii) some biological pecularities, has lost 70 % or more of its primary vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Madagascar and Their Conservation
    Birds of Madagascar and Their Conservation byMichael S. Putnam Department ofZoology University of Wisconsin tl Madison, Wisconsin I 100 plus Ecstatic Testimonials Striding up a steep hillside with the Council for Bird Preservation (Collar loud whisper of a rushing stream in and Stuart, 1985), 28 species of Warm, nurturing foods. the background, I stepped into a Malagasy birds are threatened and 14 mist-net lane I had cut a week before. species are considered as near­ Cook monthly, As I entered the clearing, a medium­ threatened. These species represent freeze in packets, sized brown bird squawked and flew between one-fifth and one-third of off from eye-level. Carefully search­ the island's endemic bird species. serve in seconds. ing the nearby vegetation, I became one of a lucky handful of foreigners The primary threats to Madagas­ At fine stores, orcall... to ever find a nest of the Brown car's birds today, habitat loss and Mesite (Mesitornis unicolor), a rare overhunting, have already eliminated 1(800) BIRD YUM forest-dwelling relative of rails. The many unique Malagasy creatures. 1 (800) 247-3986 large egg, delicately colored in sal­ Since people first arrived on Mada­ mon with liver-colored spots, rested gascar 1500 to 2000 years ago, much 13330 Bessemer Street precariously in a frail, dove-like nest of the island has been deforested, Van Nuys, CA91401-3000 positioned at the end of a sloping leaving the red lateritic soil exposed (818) 997-0598 sapling. This encounter with the and eroding, with little chance for Brown Mesite is just one of many forest regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use
    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxic Richness Patterns and Conservation Evaluation of Madagascan Tiger Beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)
    Journal of Insect Conservation 4: 109–128, 2000. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Taxic richness patterns and conservation evaluation of Madagascan tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Lantoniaina Andriamampianina1,∗, Claire Kremen2, Dick Vane-Wright3, David Lees4 & Vincent Razafimahatratra5,† 1Wildlife Conservation Society, BP 8500 Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 2Center for Conservation Biology and Wildlife Conservation Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A. 3Biogeography and Conservation Laboratory, Department of Entomology, 4Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, South Kensington, SW7 5BD, U.K. 5Facult´e des Sciences, Universit´e d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar ∗Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; phone/fax: 261-20-22-41174) †Deceased Received 12 March 1999; accepted 28 February 2000 Key words: biodiversity patterns, species richness, endemism, conservation priority areas, Madagascar Abstract Distributional ranges of 17 genera and 172 species of Malagasy tiger beetles (Coleoptera, Cicindelidae) have been compiled to determine patterns of species richness and endemism. These patterns reveal large sampling gaps, and potential priority areas for conservation action. Northern and south-western parts of the island are richer in genera, whereas eastern and especially northern parts of the rainforest show higher species richness, due to extensive radiations within the genera Pogonostoma and Physodeutera. A set of 23 areas are identified in this study as priority foci for tiger beetle conservation, and six general regions are bioinventory priorities. Introduction ecosystems), and species identifications were often uncertain. Except possibly for lemurs and birds, avail- The high level of biological diversity and local able data did not reflect the detailed distribution of the endemism in Madagascar reflects not only long iso- taxa (Ganzhorn et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Description for Shyam Thapa
    Research description for Shyam Thapa Doubling tiger numbers means doubling the prey-base: but how? The Terai Arc is landscape lying between the Ganges Plain and the foothills of the Himalayas. Biogeographically it is the most northern part of the Oriental Kingdom, and zoologically it is characterised by a mixture of Tropical species, like the Indian Rhinoceros, the Indian Tiger, the Asian Elephant, the Gavials or Hornbills and Palearctic species, such as the many migratory bird species but also mammals such as Wolves and Wild Boar. Botanically, the Oriental Floral Kingdom is a mixture of Pan-Tropical species, and shares Ethiopian species with Africa and Indo-Malayan species with the tropical Far-East. The Terai, which stretches from the area bordering Assam and Myanmar to the Punjab, was till recently nearly one hundred percent forested. Malaria eradication programmes in the 1960s enabled settlement by non-malaria resistant people, and the Terai quickly filled up with settlers from the foothills of the Himalayas to the North and from the Gangetic Plain to the South. This landnam resulted in a very fast deforestation of this stretch of land of some 1200 km E-W and 60 km N-S and now, in 2017, only little of the original vegetation still exists in a few isolated remnants which got legal protection as National Parks, both in India and Nepal. In these ever-shrinking pieces of forest an ever-shrinking population of tigers occurred. At the start of the 21st century, the world-wide number of tiger remaining in the wild approached 2000 in total in the so-called ‘range states’ (e.g., Russia, Nepal, China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia).
    [Show full text]
  • 024 Tattersall
    Ian Tattersall American Museum of Natural History, N ew Yo r k Patterns of origin and extinction in the mammal fauna of Madag a s c a r Tattersall, I., 1999 - Patterns of origin and extinction in the mammal fauna of Madagascar - in: Reumer, J . W. F. & De Vos, J. (eds.) - EL E P H A N T S H AV E A S N O R K E L! PA P E R S I N H O N O U R O F PA U L Y. SO N D A A R - D E I N S E A 7: 303-311 [ISSN 0923-9308]. Published 10 December 1999 M a d a g a s c a r ’s huge size and long history of isolation have assured ongoing debate about both the ori- gin of its oddly constituted fauna and the nature of the major extinction event that occurred following the first incursion of humans onto the island some two thousand years ago. In this paper I briefly review the geological and biological evidence for the origin of the modern Malagasy fauna, and examine the potential roles of direct human intervention and climatic change in the extinction of Madagascar’s l a rge-bodied mammals. Despite the remarkable dearth of evidence for direct interaction between humans and the island’s ‘subfossil’ fauna, available evidence of climatic conditions in Madagascar since the end of the Pleistocene does not indicate that its fauna was under unprecedented environmen- tal stress in this period. It is thus impossible to avoid the conclusion that human activity played a criti- cal role in the elimination of several dozen species of mammals and birds of larger body size than their surviving relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paris Bloubok (Hippotragus Leucophaeus (Pallas, 1766) [Bovidae]) and Its Provenance
    DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTS DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Anne Mabille COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Norman I. Platnick (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Illustration of Levaillant’s Bloubok. University of Leiden Library. Courtesy of the Library. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) Les articles ainsi que les nouveautés nomenclaturales publiés dans Zoosystema sont référencés par / Articles and nomenclatural novelties published in Zoosystema are referenced by: – ZooBank® (http://zoobank.org) Zoosystema est une revue en flux continu publiée par les Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris / Zoosystema is a fast track journal published by the Museum Science Press, Paris Les Publications scientifiques du Muséum publient aussi / The Museum Science Press also publish: Adansonia, Geodiversitas, Anthropozoologica, European Journal of Taxonomy, Naturae, Cryptogamie sous-sections Algologie, Bryologie, Mycologie. Diffusion – Publications scientifiques Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle CP 41 – 57 rue Cuvier F-75231 Paris cedex 05 (France) Tél.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Lemur Teeth in Three Keys: Dietary Adaptation, Ecospace Occupation, and Macroevolutionary Dynamics by Ethan L. Fulwood Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Doug Boyer, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Kay, Chair ___________________________ Daniel McShea ___________________________ Blythe Williams ___________________________ Elizabeth St. Clair Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT iv Lemur Teeth in Three Keys: Dietary Adaptation, Ecospace Occupation, and Macroevolutionary Dynamics by Ethan Fulwood Department of Evolutionary Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Doug Boyer, Supervisor ___________________________ Richard Kay, Chair ___________________________ Daniel McShea ___________________________ Blythe Williams ___________________________ Elizabeth St. Clair An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Ethan Fulwood 2019 Abstract Dietary adaptation appears to have driven many aspects of the high-level diversification of primates. Dental topography metrics provide a means of quantifying morphological correlates of dietary adaptation
    [Show full text]