DOCSLIB.ORG

FARA Semi-Annual Report Ending December 31, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FARA Semi-Annual Report Ending December 31, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice . Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the . Foreign Agents Registration Act . of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2015 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALGERIA..........................................................2 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................3 ARUBA............................................................4 AUSTRALIA........................................................5 AUSTRIA..........................................................7 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................8 BAHAMAS..........................................................10 BAHRAIN..........................................................11 BANGLADESH.......................................................13 BARBADOS.........................................................14 BELARUS..........................................................15 BELGIUM..........................................................16 BERMUDA..........................................................17 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA...............................................18 BRAZIL...........................................................19 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS...........................................20 BURKINA FASO.....................................................21 BURUNDI..........................................................22 CAMEROON.........................................................23 CANADA...........................................................24 CAYMAN ISLANDS...................................................28 CHILE............................................................29 CHINA............................................................30 COLOMBIA.........................................................34 CONGO (BRAZZAVILLE)..............................................36 CONGO (KINSHASA) (ZAIRE).........................................37 COTE D'IVOIRE (IVORY COAST)......................................39 CROATIA..........................................................40 CYPRUS...........................................................41 CZECH REPUBLIC...................................................42 DENMARK..........................................................43 DOMINICA.........................................................44 DOMINICAN REPUBLIC...............................................45 ECUADOR..........................................................47 EGYPT............................................................49 EL SALVADOR......................................................50 EQUATORIAL GUINEA................................................51 ESTONIA..........................................................52 ETHIOPIA.........................................................53 FIJI.............................................................54 GABON............................................................55 GEORGIA..........................................................56 GERMANY..........................................................57 GHANA............................................................59 GIBRALTAR........................................................60 GREAT BRITAIN....................................................61 GUATEMALA........................................................63 GUYANA...........................................................65 HAITI............................................................66 HONDURAS.........................................................67 HONG KONG........................................................68 HUNGARY..........................................................71 ICELAND..........................................................72 INDIA............................................................73 INDONESIA........................................................75 INTERNATIONAL....................................................77 IRAN.............................................................80 IRAQ.............................................................81 IRELAND..........................................................86 ISRAEL...........................................................88 ITALY............................................................90 JAMAICA..........................................................92 JAPAN............................................................93 JORDAN...........................................................110 KAZAKHSTAN.......................................................111 KENYA............................................................112 KOREA, REPUBLIC OF...............................................113 KOSOVA...........................................................120 KUWAIT...........................................................121 LAOS.............................................................123 LEBANON..........................................................124 LIBERIA..........................................................125 LIBYA............................................................126 LUXEMBOURG.......................................................128 MACEDONIA........................................................129 MALAWI...........................................................130 MALAYSIA.........................................................131 MALDIVES.........................................................133 MARSHALL ISLANDS.................................................134 MAURITIUS........................................................136 MEXICO...........................................................137 MOLDOVA..........................................................141 MONACO...........................................................142 MONGOLIA.........................................................143 MONTENEGRO.......................................................144 MOROCCO..........................................................145 MYANMAR (BURMA)..................................................149 NAGORNO KARABAKH.................................................150 NEPAL............................................................151 NETHERLANDS......................................................152 NEW ZEALAND......................................................153 NICARAGUA........................................................154 NIGERIA..........................................................155 NORTHERN IRELAND.................................................156 NORWAY...........................................................157 PAKISTAN.........................................................158 PALAU............................................................159 PALESTINE........................................................160 PANAMA...........................................................161 PERU.............................................................162 PHILIPPINES......................................................163 POLAND...........................................................164 QATAR............................................................165 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN..........................................167 ROMANIA..........................................................169 RUSSIA...........................................................170 RWANDA...........................................................172 SAHARAWI ARAB DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC................................173 SAUDI ARABIA.....................................................174 SCOTLAND.........................................................179 SIERRA LEONE.....................................................180 SINGAPORE........................................................181 SOMALI DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.......................................183 SOUTH AFRICA.....................................................185 SPAIN............................................................186 SRI LANKA........................................................188 ST. BARTS........................................................189 ST. CHRISTOPHER (ST. KITTS) & NEVIS..............................190 ST. LUCIA........................................................191 ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES...................................192 SWEDEN...........................................................195 SWITZERLAND......................................................196 SYRIA............................................................197 TAIWAN...........................................................198 TAJIKISTAN.......................................................202 THAILAND.........................................................203 TIBET............................................................205 TOGO.............................................................206 TUNISIA..........................................................207 TURKEY...........................................................208 UGANDA...........................................................213 UKRAINE..........................................................214
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Netiquette: Miss Manners for the Web
    4 Netiquette: Miss Manners for the Web Welcome to the world of the new influencers. The reason the social web is sometimes called the “wild west” is that we’re still working out the kinks of how best to communicate with one another online. The rules of conduct may not be set in stone, but the social web isn’t a total free-for-all either. You should be aware of some key, often mystifying, communi- cations protocols before striking up conversations with the locals. This chapter provides some lessons Friends with Benefits (C) 2009 by Darren Barefoot and Julie Szabo on how to communicate with new influencers—bloggers, YouTube stars, Facebook friend magnets, and Digg superstars. Think of this chapter as finishing school for Internet communication. If you understand the social innuendo, you’ve got a much better chance of breaking into the inner circle and getting mentioned or reviewed by powerful online influencers who can send thousands of visitors—and potential buyers—your way. We will run through a variety of communications techniques here, but if you take one lesson from this chapter, take this: Listen first. Thankfully, nearly all new influencer communications occur in the Internet’s public forum, so you can adopt an anthropological approach. By emulating the influencers’ behavior and learning their dialect, you can be confident when you approach them. As Jane Goodall discovered, the best way to learn about a species is to live among them. So you’re going to start being active online right now. Have your computer in front of you while you read this chapter, because we’re going to put you to work.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 8.71 MB, for February 01, 2017 Appendix In
    Case 4:16-cv-00469-K Document 175 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID 5923 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff, § v. § No. 4:16-CV-469-K § ERIC TRADD SCHNEIDERMAN, § Attorney General of New York, in his § official capacity, and MAURA TRACY § HEALEY, Attorney General of § Massachusetts, in her official capacity, § § Defendants. § APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THIS COURT’S PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANTS Exhibit Description Page(s) N/A Declaration of Justin Anderson (Feb. 1, 2017) v – ix A Transcript of the AGs United for Clean Power App. 1 –App. 21 Press Conference, held on March 29, 2016, which was prepared by counsel based on a video recording of the event. The video recording is available at http://www.ag.ny.gov/press- release/ag-schneiderman-former-vice-president- al-gore-and-coalition-attorneys-general-across B E-mail from Wendy Morgan, Chief of Public App. 22 – App. 32 Protection, Office of the Vermont Attorney General to Michael Meade, Director, Intergovernmental Affairs Bureau, Office of the New York Attorney General (Mar. 18, 2016, 6:06 PM) C Union of Concerned Scientists, Peter Frumhoff, App. 33 – App. 37 http://www.ucsusa.org/about/staff/staff/peter- frumhoff.html#.WI-OaVMrLcs (last visited Jan. 20, 2017, 2:05 PM) Case 4:16-cv-00469-K Document 175 Filed 02/01/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID 5924 Exhibit Description Page(s) D Union of Concerned Scientists, Smoke, Mirrors & App.
    [Show full text]
  • September 19-22, 2012 | Washington D.C. National Black Justice Coalition and U.S
    National Black Justice Coalition OUT on the Hill Black LGBT Leadership Summit September 19-22, 2012 | Washington D.C. National Black Justice Coalition and U.S. Small Business Administration Launch LGBT Economic Empowerment Tour ‘Many Faces, One Dream’ to Travel to Thirteen Cities to Promote Entrepreneurship Rich with ideas and talent, LGBT men and women are creating and leading their own companies. It’s time to expand the conversation from economic security to economic empowerment. It’s time for us to own our power. For more information email [email protected] Own Your Power! Dear Friends and Colleagues: As the Executive Director of the National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC), the nation’s leading civil rights organization dedicated to empowering Black lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, it is my privilege to welcome you to the 3rd annual OUT on the Hill Black LGBT Leadership Summit! Since 2003, NBJC has provided leadership at the intersection of African American civil rights groups and LGBT organizations, advocating for the unique challenges and needs of the Black LGBT community that are often relegated to the sidelines. Progress on LGBT social and political issues grows as LGBT people feel empowered to be open about their full identity and stake a claim in their future. NBJC strives to build an informed and strategic constituency equipped with the necessary tools to own their power. Each year, NBJC convenes a cadre of LGBT activists, elected officials, faith leaders and youth at OUT on the Hill to engage and educate Congressional leaders, the Obama Administration and federal agencies on public policy concerns of Black LGBT people and our families.
    [Show full text]
  • FARA June 30, 2013
    U.S. Department of Justice . Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the . Foreign Agents Registration Act . of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2013 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................2 ALGERIA..........................................................3 ANGOLA...........................................................4 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................6 ARUBA............................................................7 AUSTRALIA........................................................8 AUSTRIA..........................................................10 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................11 BAHAMAS..........................................................13 BAHRAIN..........................................................14 BANGLADESH.......................................................15 BARBADOS.........................................................16 BELGIUM..........................................................18 BERMUDA..........................................................19 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA...............................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Political Communication
    Political Communication KEY SKILLS SAMPLE OCCUPATIONS Writing & Editing Communications Specialist Program Coordinator Research Copy Writer Public Affairs Specialist Public Speaking Development Officer Public Information Specialist Social Perceptiveness Public Relations Specialist Social Media Specialist Leadership Editor Technical Writer Social Media Fundraiser Advertising Campaign Assistant Influence & Negotiation Lobbyist Writer/Author Problem Solving Marketing Specialist Columnist Good Judgement Media Relations Specialist Political Aide Political Knowledge & Savvy Business Acumen WORK SETTINGS Drive & Ambition Professional Presentation Business Media Law Knowledge of the “Players” Public Relations Nonprofit Higher Education Advertising Government Politics/Lobbying ONLINE RESOURCES SAMPLE EMPLOYERS Atlantic Media JOB SEARCH Publicaffairsjobs.blogspot.com Radio One DC Ad Council Opajobs.com Clear Channel Ogilvy Public Relations Journalismjobs.com CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX Simon & Schuster Communicationsjobs.net CNN, CSPAN Sage Communications Internships.com DNC, RNC Golin Time Warner APCO Worldwide Gannett Burness Communications STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS Sirius XM Radio Huffington Post The GW Hatchet FCC Ketchum College Democrats Beekeeper Group Porter Novelli College Republicans Washington Post Anne Lewis Strategies College Libertarians Tigercomm NPR, PBS GW Class Council The New York Times Slate GW Women in Business GWTV, WRGW Program Board PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND RESOURCES TEDxFoggy Bottom American Communication Association Public Relations
    [Show full text]
  • Compared to Any Other Dossier, Lobbying Against the European Data
    Image By: Kenna Bonner http://www.lifethroughpictures.com/ Creative Comons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 ompared to any other dossier, lobbying against the European data protection reform has taken unprecedented Cproportions. Shortly after the publication of the Commission proposal, Vice-President Reding told the UK newspaper The Daily Telegraph that the proposed privacy rules were subject to the most aggressive lobbying she has ever witnessed. Since the beginning of the legislative process in the EU Parliament in early 2013, lobbying efforts have only intensified. Pressure by the US government In December 2011, only days before the publication by of the proposal by the EU Commission, the United States Department of Commerce (DoC) launched a significant lobbying campaign. The campaign included high-level phone calls from senior figures in the US DoC to top level staff in the European Commission covering topics such as US business, multilateral and bilateral treaty organizations, traveller information, national security, law enforcement, trade and innovation. Partly as a result, this campaign lead to a watering down of the first draft by Commissioner Reding's staff. Between then and now, months of aggressive lobbying - especially by the US Chamber of Commerce - ensued, have recently culminated with threats of the Regulation (in its current form) sparking a "trade war". In January 2013, the US produced yet another lobbying paper to influence the European Union's decision making on European citizens' fundamental right to privacy and data protection. Data Protection \ Lobbying Industry lobbying & astroturfing resistance against the reform Many of the largest companies are undertaking a lot of lobbying in their own name and via trade associations, which is what one would expect.
    [Show full text]
  • Astroturfing Infotopia
    Astroturfing Infotopia Forthcoming, Theoria Gerry Mackie University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Dr., MC0521 La Jolla, CA 92093-0521, USA [email protected] March 2008 2 Introduction. The deliberative approach reigns in democratic theory. Yet, the institutional recommendations of deliberative democracy do not go far beyond the injunction to increase group discussion, in its sites, in its duration, and in the number of persons and issues involved. Actual deliberation, let’s say, is an institution of group discussion generally expected to yield benefits, in terms of all relevant values, more worthy than the costs. Who could be against that? Increasing discussion, however, is not the same as increasing deliberation: group discussion can have quite undesirable effects, or if positive in effect can still cost more than it’s worth. Thus, theoretical and empirical attempts to clarify the benefits and costs of group discussion in democratic politics are welcome. So far, the empirical results are mixed (Delli Carpini et al., 2004, Mendelberg 2002, Mutz 2006, McCubbins and Rodriguez 2006, Steiner et al. 2004, and others). Cass Sunstein’s Infotopia (2006) adds to worries about the benefits and costs of group discussion, and identifies novel methods of information aggregation that might usefully complement it in political democracy and elsewhere. Habermas’ ideal speech situation is an animating idea of deliberative democracy: where discussion is public and open to all, participants argue sincerely, each enjoys an equal right to participate, as Sunstein (2006) says, and, among other things, where there is an open agenda, no time and cost constraints, always the option to move the deliberation to a more reflective level, and unanimous agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 'To Quarterback Behind the Scenes, Third-Party Efforts': the Tobacco Industry and the Tea Party
    Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815 on 8 February 2013. Downloaded from ‘To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts’: the tobacco industry and the Tea Party Amanda Fallin, Rachel Grana, Stanton A Glantz ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT Tea Party tax protests in April 2009,10 the town hall published online only. To view Background The Tea Party, which gained prominence protests about the proposed healthcare reform in please visit the journal online in the USA in 2009, advocates limited government and August 20091 and the Taxpayers’ March on (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 11 tobaccocontrol-2012-050815). low taxes. Tea Party organisations, particularly Washington the following September 2009. They Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, oppose continued to facilitate and support many of the Department of Medicine, University of California smoke-free laws and tobacco taxes. local chapters and leaders that arose from the early 5 San Francisco, Center for Methods We used the Legacy Tobacco Documents events in 2009. AFP and FreedomWorks continued Tobacco Control Research and Library, the Wayback Machine, Google, LexisNexis, the to facilitate local Tea Party activities by Education, San Francisco, Center for Media and Democracy and the Center for co-sponsoring rallies,11213creating talking points California, USA Responsive Politics (opensecrets.org) to examine the and organisational tips for supporters,14 15 supply- 16 Correspondence to tobacco companies’ connections to the Tea Party. ing literature for local Tea Party groups and pro- Stanton A Glantz, Department Results Starting in the 1980s, tobacco companies viding training sessions.1317FreedomWorks was a of Medicine, University of worked to create the appearance of broad opposition to founding partner of the 2010 Contract from California San Francisco, tobacco control policies by attempting to create a America (recalling the Republican Party’s 1994 Center for Tobacco Control ’ 18 Research and Education, Room grassroots smokers rights movement.
    [Show full text]
  • FARA First Semi-Annual Report
    U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2019 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................3 ALGERIA..........................................................4 ANGOLA...........................................................5 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................6 ARUBA............................................................7 AUSTRALIA........................................................8 AUSTRIA..........................................................10 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................11 BAHAMAS..........................................................13 BAHRAIN..........................................................14 BANGLADESH.......................................................16 BARBADOS.........................................................18 BELGIUM..........................................................19 BERMUDA..........................................................20 BOLIVIA..........................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NORTH CAROLINA RIGHT to LIFE, INC., E
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NORTH CAROLINA RIGHT TO ) LIFE, INC., et. al., ) Civil Action No. 5-99-CV-798-BO(3) ) Plaintiffs, ) STATEMENT OF THOMAS E. MANN ) PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1746 IN SUPPORT v. ) OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT LARRY LEAKE, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I hereby state the following: 1. My name is Thomas E. Mann. I am the W. Averell Harriman Chair and Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution. I served as Director of the Governmental Studies Program at Brookings between 1987 and 1999 and as Executive Director of the American Political Science Association from 1981 to 1987. I earned my Ph.D. in political science at the University of Michigan in 1977, specializing in elections, parties, public opinion, Congress, and American political behavior. A copy of my complete CV is attached. 2. I have written or edited numerous books and articles on these and related subjects. I have taught at Princeton University, Johns Hopkins University, the University of Virginia, Georgetown University and American University and delivered invited lectures at many other colleges and universities and at scholarly meetings. I was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and presented with the Charles E. Merriam Award (for “a significant contribution to the art of government through the application of social science research”) and the Frank J. Goodnow Award (for “distinguished service”) by the American Political Science Association. 3. Over the last decade, much of my research and writing has focused on campaign finance in the United States and in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Annual Report 2008
    1 BOARD OF Chairman Hon. James R. Jones Dr. Malik Hasan TRUSTEES Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Chairman Manatt Jones HealthTrio, Inc. Global Strategies Ms. Mary L. Howell Executive Vice President Ms. Gina Adams* Textron Inc. Corporate Vice President, Government Affairs FedEx Corporation Mr. Leo C. Jardot Vice President, Government Relations Ms. Sarah Alexander Wyeth President Emerging Markets Private Equity Association Mrs. Sandie Knollenberg* Ms. Lisa Barry Mr. Fritz-Alan Korth* Vice President and General Manager, Attorney Government Affairs Korth & Korth Chevron Corporation Mr. Jack Krumholtz* Mrs. Robert Bennett Director of Federal Government Affairs Microsoft Ms. Judith Heisley Bishop President & Executive Director Mr. Philip C. Lauinger, Jr. Heisley Family Foundation Chairman and CEO Ambassador James R. Jones Lauinger Publishing Co. Hon. James J. Blanchard, Chairman Elect Partner Hon. Delano E. Lewis Chair, Government Affairs Practice Group Senior Fellow DLA Piper New Mexico State University Hon. Julia Chang Bloch Susan Blumenthal Markey, M.D. President Fmr. U.S. Assistant Surgeon General US-China Education Trust Rear Admiral, USPHS (ret.) Hon. Christopher Burnham Hon. Charles T. Manatt Vice Chairman & Managing Director Co-Chairman Deutsche Bank Asset Management Manatt Jones Global Strategies, LLC Mrs. Stephanie Chafee* Mrs. Howard “Buck” McKeon The Sophie and Murray Danforth Foundation Mr. Tobia G. Mercuro Mr. Martin dePorres Cargas Vice President Mr. F. Joseph Moravec Global & Environmental Policy Principal Anheuser-Busch InBev F. Joseph Moravec, LLC Mr. Oliver Chanler Ms. Maura McGill Mudd Management Consultant Mrs. Meryl Chertoff Director, Sandra Day O’Connor Mr. Greg Pensabene* Project on the State of the Judiciary Vice President, Government Georgetown University Law Center Relations & Public Affairs Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF 1.04 MB
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 It's All about the Money: The Political Economy of Climate Change Editorial Coverage Christopher James Garcia Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION “IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY”: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF CLIMATE CHANGE EDITORIAL COVERAGE By CHRISTOPHER GARCIA A Thesis submitted to the School of Communication in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2018 Christopher Garcia defended this thesis on April 19, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jennifer Proffitt Professor Directing Thesis Russell Clayton Committee Member Andy Opel Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my father, Raul, who never stopped pushing for me to continue my education and follow my scholarly passions. Your support and encouragement drive me to succeed every day. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the continued efforts and mentorship of Dr. Jennifer Proffitt. Over the course of the creation of this manuscript, her feedback and insight have benefitted the development of my writing and research skills. I am tremendously thankful for her contributions to this thesis and guidance throughout my master’s program. In addition, I would also like to appreciate the contributions of the other committee members, Dr. Russell Clayton and Dr.
    [Show full text]