'To Quarterback Behind the Scenes, Third-Party Efforts': the Tobacco Industry and the Tea Party

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'To Quarterback Behind the Scenes, Third-Party Efforts': the Tobacco Industry and the Tea Party Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815 on 8 February 2013. Downloaded from ‘To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts’: the tobacco industry and the Tea Party Amanda Fallin, Rachel Grana, Stanton A Glantz ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT Tea Party tax protests in April 2009,10 the town hall published online only. To view Background The Tea Party, which gained prominence protests about the proposed healthcare reform in please visit the journal online in the USA in 2009, advocates limited government and August 20091 and the Taxpayers’ March on (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 11 tobaccocontrol-2012-050815). low taxes. Tea Party organisations, particularly Washington the following September 2009. They Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, oppose continued to facilitate and support many of the Department of Medicine, University of California smoke-free laws and tobacco taxes. local chapters and leaders that arose from the early 5 San Francisco, Center for Methods We used the Legacy Tobacco Documents events in 2009. AFP and FreedomWorks continued Tobacco Control Research and Library, the Wayback Machine, Google, LexisNexis, the to facilitate local Tea Party activities by Education, San Francisco, Center for Media and Democracy and the Center for co-sponsoring rallies,11213creating talking points California, USA Responsive Politics (opensecrets.org) to examine the and organisational tips for supporters,14 15 supply- 16 Correspondence to tobacco companies’ connections to the Tea Party. ing literature for local Tea Party groups and pro- Stanton A Glantz, Department Results Starting in the 1980s, tobacco companies viding training sessions.1317FreedomWorks was a of Medicine, University of worked to create the appearance of broad opposition to founding partner of the 2010 Contract from California San Francisco, tobacco control policies by attempting to create a America (recalling the Republican Party’s 1994 Center for Tobacco Control ’ 18 Research and Education, Room grassroots smokers rights movement. Simultaneously, Contract with America). 366 Library, 530 Parnassus, they funded and worked through third-party groups, As of 2012, AFP and FreedomWorks were sup- San Francisco, such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, the predecessor porting the tobacco companies’ political agenda by CA 94143-1390, USA; of AFP and FreedomWorks, to accomplish their economic mobilising local Tea Party opposition to tobacco [email protected] and political agenda. There has been continuity of some taxes and smoke-free laws.19 20 This support for Received 1 October 2012 key players, strategies and messages from these groups the tobacco companies’ agenda continues the Accepted 29 January 2013 to Tea Party organisations. As of 2012, the Tea Party tobacco industry use of AFP and FreedomWorks’ Published Online First was beginning to spread internationally. predecessor organisation, Citizens for a Sound copyright. 8 February 2013 Conclusions Rather than being a purely grassroots Economy (CSE), as a third-party ally since at least movement that spontaneously developed in 2009, the 1991 (figure 1). Moreover, starting in the 1980s, Tea Party has developed over time, in part through major US tobacco companies attempted to manu- decades of work by the tobacco industry and other facture an astroturf citizen ‘smokers’ rights move- corporate interests. It is important for tobacco control ment’ to oppose local tobacco control policies. advocates in the USA and internationally, to anticipate These smokers rights’ groups had grassroots mem- and counter Tea Party opposition to tobacco control bership in several localities, but were created, coor- http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ policies and ensure that policymakers, the media and the dinated and funded by the cigarette companies.21 public understand the longstanding connection between Although the Tea Party is widely considered to the tobacco industry, the Tea Party and its associated have started in 2009,9 this paper presents a histor- organisations. ical study of some of the tobacco companies’ early activities and key players in the evolution of the Tea Party. Many people in the smokers’ rights INTRODUCTION effort or the tobacco companies went on to Tea The Tea Party, a loosely organised network of grass- Party organisations. Moreover, while the Tea Party started in the USA, it is beginning to spread inter- roots coalitions at local and state levels, is a complex 22–26 social and political movement to the right of the nationally. In 2012 FreedomWorks expanded the movement internationally, training activists in traditional Republican Party that promotes less on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected 1–4 30 countries, including Israel, Georgia, Japan, government regulation and lower taxes. It is 22 often characterised as a grassroots movement that Nigeria and Serbia. This international expansion – spontaneously arose in 2009.4 5 However, it has makes it likely that Tea Party organisations will be also been cited as an example of corporate ‘astro- mounting opposition to tobacco control (and other 5 health) policies as they have done in the USA. Open Access turfing,’ defined as a movement that ‘appears to be Scan to access more free content grassroots, but is either funded, created or conceived by a corporation or industry trade associ- METHODS ation, political interest group or public relations We conducted a standard snowball search27 of the – firm.’6 8 National organisations funded by corpora- Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, an online tions, particularly Americans for Prosperity (AFP) archive of over 80 million pages of previously secret and FreedomWorks, played an important role in tobacco industry documents. Initial search terms structuring and supporting the Tea Party in the included: CSE, tobacco tax, Food and Drug initial stages.5 They provided training, communica- Administration (FDA) and tobacco (1993–1996), To cite: Fallin A, Grana R, tion and materials for the earliest Tea Party activities, Racketeer Corrupt and Influenced Organisations Glantz SA. Tob Control including the first ‘Tea Party’ on 27 February (RICO), Kessler (1999–2006), Department of Justice – 2014;23:322 331. 2009.19FreedomWorks organised the nationwide (DOJ) (1999–2006) and lawsuit (1999–2006). We 322 Fallin A, et al. Tob Control 2014;23:322–331. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815 Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815 on 8 February 2013. Downloaded from Figure 1. Connections between the tobacco industry, third-party allies and the Tea Party, from the 1980’s (top) through 2012 (bottom). The thick black line connects CSE with its direct successor organisations. Online supplementary tables S1 and S2 provide more details on the linkages depicted in this figure. copyright. used the Wayback Machine (archive.org) to access old versions of Lobbying efforts are facing increasing difficulty. Even national the CSE, AFP and FreedomWorks’ websites (since 1997) and representatives from tobacco states are losing heart for defending Google, LexisNexis, the Center for Media and Democracy smokers’ rights and sustaining the tobacco industry. The power of the vested interest of the tobacco industry has not been fully (sourcewatch.org and PRwatch.org), Center for Responsive 34 Politics (opensecrets.org) and AFP (americansforprosperity.org) brought to bear in sustaining smokers [sic] rights. ’ ’ and FreedomWorks (freedomworks.org) websites internal search As of 2012, key personnel from the smokers’ rights groups engines. Internal Revenue Service Form 990s were obtained from had founded or worked at firms that consulted for Tea Party http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ 2002 to 2010 using Guidestar and Foundation Finder for CSE, groups (figure 1). CSE FreedomWorks, FreedomWorks and AFP.Searches were con- In the 1990s, RJR’s smokers’ rights groups were organised ducted from September 2011 to March 2012. We refer to CSE through a network of field coordinators who recruited members, ‘ ’ and Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation as CSE, AFP and held meetings and provided meeting agendas, letters to editors ‘ ’ Americans for Prosperity Foundation as AFP, and FreedomWorks and elected officials, a telephone script for contacting elected ‘ ’ and FreedomWorks Foundation as FreedomWorks. officials and petitions.33 By the mid-1990s, RJR was using public relations firms Ramhurst and Walt Klein & Associates to help RESULTS coordinate their smokers’ rights groups. Ramhurst was formed in Figure 1 provides an overview of the connections the tobacco 1993 with support from RJR and run by former RJR smokers’ industry has with organisations and key players in the Tea Party. rights group coordinators, James Ellis and Doug Goodyear35 36 Online supplementary table S1 provides details of key organisa- (past vice president of Walt Klein & Associates in North on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected tions involved with the tobacco industry and the Tea Party and Carolina, see online supplementary table S2). By 1994 Ramhurst online supplementary table S2 provides histories of key was coordinating RJR’s smokers’ rights groups, providing ‘the individuals. field personnel necessary to implement and execute various pro- grammes and activities related to RJR’s national grassroots pro- Historical context for tobacco industry third-party efforts gramme,’37 with Walt Klein & Associates providing ‘ancillary The tobacco industry historically worked through ‘third-party’ services necessary to support the field force.’37
Recommended publications
  • “How the Nanny Has Become La Tata”: Analysis of an Audiovisual
    Università degli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Letterari Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Lingue Moderne per la Comunicazione e la Cooperazione Internazionale Classe LM-38 Tesi di Laurea “How The Nanny has become La Tata”: analysis of an audiovisual translation product Relatore Laureando Prof. Maria Teresa Musacchio Susanna Sacconi n° matr. 1018252 / LMLCC Anno Accademico 2012 / 2013 Contents: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 – THEORY OF AUDIOVISUAL TRANSLATION 1.1 Translation: General concepts 3 1.2 Audiovisual translation 6 1.3 Audiovisual translation in Europe 10 1.4 Linguistic transfer 12 1.4.1 Classification for the current AVT modes 14 1.5 Dubbing vs Subtitling 22 CHAPTER 2 – DUBBING IN ITALIAN AUDIOVISUAL TRANSLATION 2.1 Dubbing: An introduction 27 2.2 A short history of Italian dubbing 31 2.3 The professional figures in dubbing 33 2.4 The process of dubbing 36 2.5 Quality in dubbing 40 CHAPTER 3 – DUBBING: ASPECTS AND PROBLEMS 3.1 Culture and cultural context in dubbing 43 3.2 Dialogues: their functions and their translation in films 47 3.3 Difficulties in dubbing: culture-bound terms and cultural references 51 3.3.1 Culture-bound terms 54 3.3.2 Ranzato: the analysis of cultural specific elements 55 3.4 Translation strategies in dubbing (and subtitling) 59 3.4.1 Other strategies: Venuti’s model and Toury’s laws 63 3.4.2 The choice of strategies 65 3.5 Other translation problems: humour and allocutive forms 67 3.5.1 Humour 67 3.5.2 Allocutive forms 68 3.6 Synchronization and other technical problems 70 3.6.1 Synchronization
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicalspov.Pdf
    “Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Juliana Geran Pilon Education
    JULIANA GERAN PILON [email protected] Dr. Juliana Geran Pilon is Research Professor of Politics and Culture and Earhart Fellow at the Institute of World Politics. For the previous two years, she taught in the Political Science Department at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. From January 1991 to October 2002, she was first Director of Programs, Vice President for Programs, and finally Senior Advisor for Civil Society at the International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES), after three years at the National Forum Foundation, a non-profit institution that focused on foreign policy issues - now part of Freedom House - where she was first Executive Director and then Vice President. At NFF, she assisted in creating a network of several hundred young political activists in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. For the past thirteen years she has also taught at Johns Hopkins University, the Institute of World Politics, George Washington University, and the Institute of World Politics. From 1981 to 1988, she was a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation, writing on the United Nations, Soviet active measures, terrorism, East-West trade, and other international issues. In 1991, she received an Earhart Foundation fellowship for her second book, The Bloody Flag: Post-Communist Nationalism in Eastern Europe -- Spotlight on Romania, published by Transaction, Rutgers University Press. Her autobiographical book Notes From the Other Side of Night was published by Regnery/Gateway, Inc. in 1979, and translated into Romanian in 1993, where it was published by Editura de Vest. A paperback edition appeared in the U.S. in May 1994, published by the University Press of America.
    [Show full text]
  • (A Thousand Points Of) Light on Biased Language
    Shedding (a Thousand Points of) Light on Biased Language Tae Yano Philip Resnik School of Computer Science Department of Linguistics and UMIACS Carnegie Mellon University University of Maryland Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] [email protected] Noah A. Smith School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA [email protected] Abstract To what extent a sentence or clause is biased (none, • somewhat, very); This paper considers the linguistic indicators of bias in political text. We used Amazon Mechanical Turk The nature of the bias (very liberal, moderately lib- • judgments about sentences from American political eral, moderately conservative, very conservative, bi- blogs, asking annotators to indicate whether a sen- ased but not sure which direction); and tence showed bias, and if so, in which political di- rection and through which word tokens. We also Which words in the sentence give away the author’s asked annotators questions about their own political • views. We conducted a preliminary analysis of the bias, similar to “rationale” annotations in Zaidan et data, exploring how different groups perceive bias in al. (2007). different blogs, and showing some lexical indicators strongly associated with perceived bias. For example, a participant might identify a moderate liberal bias in this sentence, 1 Introduction Without Sestak’s challenge, we would have Bias and framing are central topics in the study of com- Specter, comfortably ensconced as a Democrat munications, media, and political discourse (Scheufele, in name only. 1999; Entman, 2007), but they have received relatively adding checkmarks on the underlined words.
    [Show full text]
  • Making and Managing Class: Employment of Paid Domestic Workers in Russia Anna Rotkirch, Olga Tkach and Elena Zdravomyslova Intro
    Making and Managing Class: Employment of Paid Domestic Workers in Russia Anna Rotkirch, Olga Tkach and Elena Zdravomyslova This text is published with minor corrections as Chapter 6 in Suvi Salmenniemi (ed) Rethinking class in Russia. London: Ashgate 2012, 129-148. Introduction1 Before, they used to say “everybody comes from the working classes”. I have had to learn these new practices from scratch. I had to understand how to organise my domestic life, how to communicate with the people who I employ. They have to learn this too. (Lidiia, housekeeper) Social class is a relational concept, produced through financial, social and symbolic exchange and acted out in the market, in work places, and also in personal consumption and lifestyle. The relations between employers and employees constitute one key dimension of social class. Of special interest are the contested interactions that lack established cultural scripts and are therefore prone to uncertainties and conflicts. Commercialised interactions in the sphere of domesticity contribute to the making of social class no less than do those in the public sphere. In this chapter, we approach paid domestic work as a realm of interactions through which class boundaries are drawn and class identity is formed. We are interested in how middle class representatives seek out their new class identity through their standards and strategies of domestic management, although we also discuss the views of the domestic workers. As the housekeeper Lidiia stresses in the introductory quotation to this chapter, both employers and employees have to learn new micro-management practices and class relations from scratch. The assertion that class is in continual production (Skeggs 2004) is especially true for the contemporary Russian situation, where stratification grids are loose and class is restructured under the pressure of political and economic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Millions Spread Influence Through Nonprofits, Colleges
    HOME ABOUT STAFF INVESTIGATIONS ILAB BLOGS WORKSHOP NEWS Koch millions spread influence through nonprofits, colleges B Y C H A R L E S L E W I S , E R I C H O L M B E R G , A L E X I A F E R N A N D E Z C A M P B E L L , LY D I A B E Y O U D Monday, July 1st, 2013 ShareThis Koch Industries, one of the largest privately held corporations in the world and principally owned by billionaires Charles and David Koch, has developed what may be the best funded, multifaceted, public policy, political and educational presence in the nation today. From direct political influence and robust lobbying to nonprofit policy research and advocacy, and even increasingly in academia and the broader public “marketplace of ideas,” this extensive, cross-sector Koch club or network appears to be unprecedented in size, scope and funding. And the relationship between these for-profit and nonprofit entities is often mutually reinforcing to the direct financial and political interests of the behemoth corporation — broadly characterized as deregulation, limited government and free markets. The cumulative cost to Koch Industries and Charles and David Koch for this extraordinary alchemy of political and lobbying influence, nonprofit public policy underwriting and educational institutional support was $134 million over a recent five- year period. The global conglomerate has 60,000 employees and annual revenue of $115 billion and estimated pretax profit margins of 10 percent, according to Forbes. An analysis by the Investigative Reporting Workshop found that from 2007 through 2011, Koch private foundations gave $41.2 million to 89 nonprofit organizations and an annual libertarian conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 881
    1 Union Calendar No. 881 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–1114 ACTIVITIES OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2019 (Pursuant to House Rule XI, 1(d)(1)) Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdys.gov http://oversight.house.gov/ JANUARY 2, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 33–945 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:03 Jan 08, 2019 Jkt 033945 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR1114.XXX HR1114 SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS E:\Seals\Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM TREY GOWDY, South Carolina, Chairman JOHN DUNCAN, Tennessee ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland DARRELL ISSA, California CAROLYN MALONEY, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of MARK SANFORD, South Carolina Columbia JUSTIN AMASH, Michigan WILLIAM LACY CLAY, Missouri PAUL GOSAR, Arizona STEPHEN LYNCH, Massachusetts SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee JIM COOPER, Tennessee VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ROBIN KELLY, Illinois MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina BRENDA LAWRENCE, Michigan DENNIS ROSS, Florida BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARK WALKER, North Carolina RAJA KRISHNAMOORTHI, Illinois ROD BLUM, Iowa JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland JODY B. HICE, Georgia JIMMY GOMEZ, California STEVE RUSSELL, Oklahoma PETER WELCH, Vermont GLENN GROTHMAN, Wisconsin MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Identity Framing, and the Rhetoric of the Kill in Conservative Hate Mail
    Communication, Culture & Critique ISSN 1753-9129 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Foiling the Intellectuals: Gender, Identity Framing, and the Rhetoric of the Kill in Conservative Hate Mail Dana L. Cloud Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA This article introduces the concept of identity framing by foil. Characteristics of this communicative mechanism are drawn from analysis of my personal archive of conservative hate mail. I identify 3 key adversarial identity frames attributed to me in the correspondence: elitist intellectual, national traitor, and gender traitor. These identity frames serve as foils against which the authors’ letters articulate identities as real men and patriots. These examples demonstrate how foiling one’s adversary relies on the power of naming; applies tremendous pressure to the target through identification and invocation of vulnerabilities; and employs tone and verbal aggression in what Burke identified as ‘‘the kill’’: the definition of self through the symbolic purgation and/or negation of another. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01048.x I was deluged with so much hate mail, but none of it was political ....It was like, ‘‘Gook, chink, cunt. Go back to your country, go back to your country where you came from, you fat pig. Go back to your country you fat pig, you fat dyke. Go back to your country, fat dyke. Fat dyke fat dyke fat dyke—Jesus saves.’’—Margaret Cho, ‘‘Hate Mail From Bush Supporters’’ (2004) My question to you. If you was [sic] a professor in Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Palestinian university or even in Russia. etc. How long do you think you would last as a living person regarding your anti government rhetoric in those countries? We have a saying referring to people like you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1997 Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right Kathleen S Espin University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Espin, Kathleen S, "Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right" (1997). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3321. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/CQHQ-ABU5 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direct^ from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiic^ udnle others may be fix>m any type o f computer printer. The qnalityr of this reproduction is dependent npon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety afikct reproduction.
    [Show full text]