DOCSLIB.ORG

2.1 Million + Nugaal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENTAWDAL CLUSTER BARI SOMALIA JANUARYSANAAG 2018 WOQOOYI GALBEED TOGDHEER SOOL OPERATIONAL PRESENCE OF CLUSTER PARTNERS BENEFICIARIES REACHED AS OF JANUARY 2.1 MILLION + NUGAAL Bossaso ⛳☀ 1.1m people newly displaced in Somalia since January 2017 AWDAL AWDAL BARI BARI CCCM has currently 9 active partners focusing on areas with the highest levels SANAAG of urban displacement and implementing comprehensive CCCM projects in WOQOOYI MUDUG WOQOOYI Baidoa, Kismayo, Dollow and Garowe. GALBEED SANAAG TOGDHEER GALBEED SOOL General CCCM works closely with Shelter, Protection and WASH clusters to develop ⛳☀ integrated packages for service provision in sites to ensure people have Hargeysa TOGDHEER update NUGAAL access to lifesaving services that meet minimum standards GALGADUUD SOOL A joint mission to Dollow was conducted by the National CCCM cluster and Garowe ⛳☀ UNICEF emergency section to visit IDP sites as part of the Taskforce to address ! ! malnutrition in IDP sites. Galgaduud Nugaal 1 MUDUG (!2 NUGAAL (! Adado Garowe New arrivals in Baidoa are estimated at 7,000 individuals (PRMN) in January BAKOOL ! HIRAAN DKH, CPD ACTED 2017. Service provision has not increased to address the growing population. Galgaduud 2 Key gaps highlighted by CCCM include Health, Wash and Shelter. GALGADUUD (! ! ! Dhuusamarreeb Gaalkacyo ⛳☀ Mudug !3 CCCM partners in Kismayo conducted CCCM training for 30 local authorities MUDUG ( GEDO MIDDLE DKH, CPD Galkaacyo Camp and site leaders. SHABELLE ! BAY ! DKH, CPD, DRC, UNHCR BAKOOL Management HIRAAN Bay (!5 A house-to-house population count was conducted in Kabasa and Qansaxlay Baidoa sites in Dollow in partnership with camp leadership and local authorities. BANADIR ACTED, DRC, IOM, ! GEDO MIDDLE AVORD, NRC GALGADUUD CCCM partners in Baidoa conducted a WASH gap analysis in partnership with Gedo 1 BAY SHABELLE (! ! the WASH cluster. This gap analysis has helped to kick start the improvement LOWER Dollow MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE IOM of WASH service provision in Baidoa. BANADIR ! The Baidoa CCCM Sub Cluster led a joint verification exercise and verified 323 LOWER BAKOOL MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE ! HIRAAN IDP sites, an increase of 18 sites since last month. GEDO Service mapping were completed in Baidoa and Garowe and inform on ! Individuals reached Baidoa Sub Clusters which partners provide key services at sites. This allows CCCM partners to ⛳☀ Individuals reached MIDDLE flag duplication in activities and gaps in services. LOWER BAY SHABELLE LOWER ! JUBA 0 0 0 0 JUBA 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 The sub clusters in Kismayo held their first cluster meeting to provide an 0 0 0 0 00 0 Lower Shabelle , ,0 , ,0 ,,0 ,0 ,0 !3 0 0 5 5 55 5 5 ! ( 6 9 6 9 6 9 61 4 9 > > 1 4 Afgooye overview of CCCM activities and cluster mandate to humanitarian partners > 0 > 0 > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >0 0 > , , 0 0 ! 0 8 0 0 0, , 0 ⛳☀ BANADIR 3 6 5 5 ! AVORD, SYPD, NRC ,0 ,0 09 6 0 providing services in sites. 8 0 ,0 1 ,0 Mogadishu 3 6 5 5 Banadir (!6 9 6 1 LOWER Mogadishu CCCM partners continue to roll out Detailed Site Assessment to cover the MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE AVORD, DKH, DBG majority of districts within Somalia. The DSA will be complemented by the DRC, UNHCR, NRC Comprehensive Site Assessments (household level surveys). These are being STRATEGIC INDICATORS launched in key districts with highest levels of displacement to get more IM #1 # of sites with established CCCM mechanisms accurate data. A Risk Criteria is being developed through a collaborative inter cluster Target: 1,600* sites; Achieved: 607 sites ⛳☀ ⛳☀ Coordination hubs approach to highlight sites that are the most vulnerable and need immediate Kismayo (!# Number of partners LOWER ! ! humanitarian support. Displaced People in Sites 1.6 M Displaced People reached 983,000 JUBA Lower Juba (!2 Mogadishu IOM, UNHCR Partners with ongoing activities Baidoa IOM, UNHCR *Based on an estimated 2,000 sites in Somalia, targeting 80% Kismayo Cluster Coordination IOM, UNHCR Kismayo IOM, UNHCR IOM, ACTED Partners presence per district #2 # of sites covered by the Detailed Site Assessment Hargeisa UNHCR Communication with Communities ACTED, DRC, IOM Galkaacyo UNHCR Garowe UNHCR Construction of community spaces AVORD, NRC Target: 89 Districts Achieved: 24 Districts 1 2 4 6 Bossasso UNHCR > > > 1 2 4 Coordination and monitoring of service delivery ACTED, IOM #1 # of sites with established community participation structures Conducting Detailed Site Assessments CRS, NRC, REACH, UNHCR Target: 1,600 Achieved: 1,289 Integrated CCCM/ Shelter/Protection Projects AVORD, DRC, DKH, NRC, SYPD, UNHCR #2 # of displaced people with access to information about Site planning and improvement AVORD, DKH, IOM, NRC, SYPD humanitarian services Training and capacity building of camp committees AVORD, DKH, DRC, IOM, NRC, UNHCR Target: 1.5 M Achieved: 1.1 M (! A(!WDAL (! DETAILED SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE (! (! (! BARI (! (! SANAAG (! SOMALIA WOQOO YI JANUARY 2018 GAL(!BEED (! TOGDHEER (! (! (! SOOL IDP SITES ASSESSED SINCE SEPTEMBER DSA PARTNERS COVERAGE (! (! The Detailed Site Assessment is an inter-cluster and inter-agency initiative (! NUGAAL that aims to strengthen the predictability and effectiveness of multi sectorial (! interventions at site level and/or areas of concentration of sites. !!! (! A(!WDAL (! AWDAL (!45 (! BARI BARI (! (! SAN(!AAG SANAAG (! (! Purpose: (! WOQOOYI MUDUG ! 13 WOQOOYI !!!! !!!! ! ! GALBEED (! !! !! ( !!! !! !! (! Provide multi sector information on access/availability to basic services in GALBEED (! TOGDHEER (! (! (!19 TOGDHEER (! SOOL SOOL displacement sites to acertain gaps in service provision and monitor services (!23 ! (! ! ! (!21 (! !!! (! being provided to ensure minimum standards are being met. !! (! NUGAAL 13 (! (! GALGADUUD NUGAAL (! Methodology: (!60 (! !! !!! (! !!! The DSA is implemented by partner’s organisations who are already ! MUDUG MUDUG B(!AKOOL HIRAAN !! ! (! operating in a specific location. The questionnaire is administered by a trained !! ( 6 (! (! (! (! (! enumerator to a key informant. Two key informants are interviewed for each 13 !!! (! (! (! GALGADUUD GALGADUUD site: one camp leader and one women’s representative. The assessment uses GEDO (! (! M!IDDLE ! ( !!! 113 BAY SHA(!BELLE a grid search pattern to ensure that all sites within the district are visited. (! (! 7 ! (! (! !!! BAKOOL (! BAKOOL (! HIRAAN HIRAAN !! (! (! (! ! (! (! 1 (! BANADIR CCCM Cluster partners have carried the Detailed Site Assessment in 24 (! (! (!10 (!265 (! ! !!! 3 GEDO !(! ! GEDO ( ( Districts as of January and are identifying partners for data collection in 20 (! MIDDLE LOWER M(!IDDLE BAY SHABELLE BAY SHABELLE Site location Site type Site expansion Land ownership CWC WASH Shelter ! MIDDLE JUBA(! SHABELLE districts. (!4 (! (! !! Site location ! Site type Site expansion (! Land ownership CWC WASH Shelter 106 (! ! (! ! ! ! ( !!!! 81% !!!!!!!!!!! BANADIR (! BANADIR The data fromPrivate the Detailed Site Assessment1354 can be found online at: https:// (!5 ! ! 7.00% 81% ( 10% 915 (! Private (! 1354 22% LOWER (! LOWER 7.00% 10% cccm-cluster-somalia.github.io/OPSMAP/ MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE 22% MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE Local authority 63 47% (! (! 44% Local authority 63 47% 10 44% Number of sites 56% 53% (! (! DSA None 52 RoundOther 1 Round 2 Total reached !! in each dist56%rict 53% None 52 Other Federal government 78% LOWER(! 16% 78% 1 > 30 Federal government Districts assessed 10 14 93.00% 24 90% 16% 78%of verified sites JUBA Federal government None !!! 40 !!! None 93.00% 90% 3% LOWER (! Federal goverLnOmWeEnRt(!40 DSA Coverage Indicative IDP population 126 3% are spontaneous Local authority Sufficient info on services received Potable water available Sites JwhereUBA shelter(! 30 > 125 JUBA Local authority (! DSA CoverageSufficieIntd inicfaot iovne sIeDrPvi cepos pruecelatiivoend Potable water available Sites where shelter Planned Spontaneous no yes Sites assessed Pri vate1,527 Insu 224fficien t info on services received 1,751Pota ble water not available support was received 165,000 > 485,800 Other 21 Planned Spontaneous no yes Other 21 Private Covered Insufficient info on services received Potable water not available support was received 165,000 7> 548,05,0800> 165,000 Sites where shelter DSA Round 1 125 > 265 Covered Planned 75,000> 31605,,70000 > 75,000 Sites where shelter Individuals reached 1,118,089 431,741 1,549,830 support was not received Planned 30,700 >6 705,000 >0 30,700 !!!(!(!(!(! 600 > 30,700 support was not received ((((! DSA Round 2 265 > 915 UnUancaccecessssiblele SITE KEY FINDINGS Site Management Site location# Sites per districtSite type SiteSite location locationSiteSite expansion locationSiteSite type type Site type SiteSiteLand expansion expansion ownershipSite expansion Site locationLandLandCWC ownershipownershipSiteLand ManagementSite ownershipSite type locationWASH Site expansionCWCCWCSite typeShelterCWC Site# WASHexpansionWASHSites perWASH Landdistrict ownershipShelterShelterShelterLand ownershipCWC CWCWASH ShelterWASH Shelter 81% 81%81% 81% 81% 81% Private PrPrivateivate 1354 Private 1354 Private7.00% 1354 1354 7.00%7.00% 10%7.00% Private 10%10%1354 10% 7.00%1354 7.00% 10% 10% 22% 22%22% 22% 22% 22%915 No management 43% 915 No management 43% Local authority 63 LLooccalal a auutthhoorrityityLocal63 63authority 63 47% Local authority 6347%47% 47%Local authority 63 47% 47% 44% 44%44% 44% 44% 44% Residents 18% Residents 18% 56% 53% 53% 53% 53% O56%t56%her 56% 56% 53% 56% 53% None 52 NNoonnee 5522 None 52 OOtthheerr Other None 52 Other None 52 Other Federal
Recommended publications
  • Cholera Factsheet Somalia

    Cholera Factsheet Somalia

    Cholera Factsheet for Action - ZAMBIA CHOLERA FACTSHEET SOMALIA Figure 1. Annual number of suspected cholera cases and case fatality CHOLERA OVERVIEW rate in Somalia, 1990 – 20171 Seventh pandemic cholera was first reported in Somalia in 1970. Since 1990, the largest outbreaks were reported in 1994- 1996, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011-2012 and 2016-2017. Large- scale epidemics have increased over the past two decades (Fig. 1).1 During 2012 and 2016-2018, epidemiological surveillance reported 112,736 suspected cholera cases. South-Central Somalia accounted for 77% of all reported cholera cases (Table I). In South-Central, the regions of Banadir and Bay, were most affected with a combined 32.3% of all suspected cases during the near four-year period (Fig. 2, Table II).2 The country has been affected by recent cross-border cholera outbreaks involving Ethiopia, Kenya and likely Yemen.3 CHOLERA DISTRIBUTION Figure 2. Cumulative cholera incidence by region in Somalia, 2012, In South-Central Somalia, Banadir Region (coterminous with 2 the city of Mogadishu) reported cholera outbreaks every year of 2016-2018 the study period and accounted for the highest percentage of cholera cases among all regions (17.6%). Bay Region reported 14.7% of all suspected cases, of which 90.2% were reported during the recent outbreak in 2017 (Fig. 4, Table II).2 Lower Juba Region, which borders Garissa County and Wajir County in Kenya, reported 9.2% of all suspected cases. Lower Juba consistently reported cholera outbreaks all four years. Lower Shabelle Region, which borders Banadir Region, reported 7.1% of all suspected cases.
  • Country Profile – Somalia

    Country Profile – Somalia

    Country profile – Somalia Version 2014 Recommended citation: FAO. 2014. AQUASTAT Country Profile – Somalia. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
  • Weekly Update on Displacement and Other Population Movements in South-Central Somalia 14 - 20 April 2014 UNHCR Somalia

    Weekly Update on Displacement and Other Population Movements in South-Central Somalia 14 - 20 April 2014 UNHCR Somalia

    Weekly update on displacement and other population movements in South-Central Somalia 14 - 20 April 2014 UNHCR Somalia Overview Total estimated IDPs for the week 1,500 In summary, close to 1,500 civilians were displaced during the reporting period. Marka and the outskirts of Mogadishu are now major places of new displacement. IDPs in these Total estimated IDPs since early March 2014 72,700 locations are in need of assistance. ETHIOPIA Ceel Barde Belet Weyne Displacement to Luuq town (Gedo) GALGADUUD According to UNHCR partners, 50 individuals arrived to Luuq from Buurdhuubo (southern Rab dhuure Gedo). The estimated total number of new IDPs in Luuq since the beginning of March is now BAKOOL around 2,450 persons. IDPs from Buurdhuubo are of the same clan as Luuq host Buur dhuxunle Xudur HIRAAN community and are accommodated by extended family members from Luuq. Luuq Waajid Bulo Barde Kurtow Baidoa GEDO Buurdhuubo Buur Hakaba SHABELLE DHEXE Displacement to Baidoa town (Bay) from Bakool region BAY Another 120 IDPs arrived to Baidoa from Bakool region (mainly Wajid district). UNHCR also received reports of the onset of new displacement 150 individuals from Buur dhuxunle BANADIR town in Bakool to the near by villages after SFG attacked the town. Qoryooley Mogadishu SHABELLE HOOSE Marka KENYA JUBA DHEXE Buulo mareer Displacement inside Shabelle Hoose Baraawe Indian Ocean Afmadow Jilib Around 500 civilians arrived to Marka from Qoryooley town over the last couple of days. The total number of new IDPs in Marka is now 9 -9,500 persons. Dobley Region IDP Pop. Legend JUBA HOOSE Bakool 6,990 Main States/Divisions of Origin Kismaayo Banadir 8,350 Bay 16,960 Refugee Camp Displacement to Mogadishu Gedo 3,098 Town, village Hiraan 27,000 Around 400 IDPs from Qoryoley town (Shabelle Hoose) and 250 from Buulo Mareer arrived Major movements to Mogadishu (Km 7-13).
  • South and Central Somalia Security Situation, Al-Shabaab Presence, and Target Groups

    South and Central Somalia Security Situation, Al-Shabaab Presence, and Target Groups

    1/2017 South and Central Somalia Security Situation, al-Shabaab Presence, and Target Groups Report based on interviews in Nairobi, Kenya, 3 to 10 December 2016 Copenhagen, March 2017 Danish Immigration Service Ryesgade 53 2100 Copenhagen Ø Phone: 00 45 35 36 66 00 Web: www.newtodenmark.dk E-mail: [email protected] South and Central Somalia: Security Situation, al-Shabaab Presence, and Target Groups Table of Contents Disclaimer .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and methodology ......................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations..................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Security situation ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The overall security situation ........................................................................................................ 7 1.2. The extent of al-Shabaab control and presence.......................................................................... 10 1.3. Information on the security situation in selected cities/regions ................................................ 11 2. Possible al-Shabaab targets in areas with AMISOM/SNA presence .......................................................
  • Somalia Drought Response

    Somalia Drought Response

    Somalia Since 1991, International Medical Corps has worked in Somalia to implement programs that build local capacity while serving the immediate health, nutrition and sanitation and hygiene needs of the most vulnerable. Drought conditions continue to worsen in Somalia and famine looms as the country’s long-running armed conflict drags on, taking a heavy toll on civilians in much of the south-central region. The effects of drought, flooding, and displacement in addition to the fighting have left approximately half of the population dependent on outside support for their survival and livelihoods support. The drought continues to drive people from their homes in search of assistance, while disease outbreaks including cholera and measles are spreading. Restrictions on humanitarian access exacerbate the already precarious situation. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO DROUGHT International Medical Corps is scaling up health and nutrition assistance in Mudug, Galgaduud, and Banadir, three regions at emergency levels of acute food insecurity (IPC 4). In addition, International Medical Corps is providing health, nutrition screening, and water and sanitation (WASH) assistance within the Middle Shabelle Region, currently at crisis levels of food insecurity (IPC 3). This includes mobile medical clinics in Galgaduud, Banadir, and Middle Shabelle that reach remote communities with life- saving care. We are also running a 54-bed stabilization center that provides 24-hour care for severely malnourished children with medical complications at Galkayo South Hospital. In Mogadishu, International Medical Corps is providing primary health and nutrition services in two displacement settlements. This includes screening for and treatment of acute malnutrition as well as community education healthy infant and young child feeding practices and food rations.
  • Cash and Markets Quarterly Dashboard - Somalia October - December 2018 Produced on 30Th January 2019

    Cash and Markets Quarterly Dashboard - Somalia October - December 2018 Produced on 30Th January 2019

    Cash and Markets Quarterly Dashboard - Somalia October - December 2018 Produced on 30th January 2019 Introduction Recommended transfer values Table 1: Recommended transfer values (USD) Map 1: Percentage change in price of main cereal from October to December 2018 Cash-based interventions have been used by The CWG uses FSNAU's CMEB values as the basis Region Multi-purpose Food transfer humanitarian organisations in Somalia since 20031. for determining transfer value recommendations. transfer value value However significant variations have been noted in As per the decision of the CWG, food transfer value Awdal 85 (75) 80 (70) transfer values, sometimes in the same place by recommendations should correspond to 100% of the different organisations, with varying justifications. It is in cost of the food MEB, while multi-purpose transfer value Bakool 70 60 light of this that the Somalia Cash Working Group (CWG) recommendations should correspond to 80% of the Banaadir 65 50 started convening in February 2017, against a backdrop cost of the full MEB, both rounded to the nearest 5. In Bari 85 80 of an increase in number of agencies using cash-based addition, transfer value recommendations should remain Bay 50 30 interventions to respond to the 2016-2017 drought, fixed for three months at a time, and only be subject to with an aim to streamline the design, development change if the CMEB changes by more than 10% (see Galgaduud 100 90 and implementation of cash based interventions in the Tables 2 and 3 for details on the CMEB). Gedo 70 60 country. Within this, the CWG provides transfer value In consideration of this, in regions where a more than Hiraan 60 45 recommendations on a quarterly basis - based on the 10% change in the CMEB was recorded between October cost of the minimum expenditure basket (CMEB) - to Lower Juba 95 75 and December 2018, an updated recommendation is humanitarian organisations implementing cash-based Lower Shabelle 45 30 provided and the previous one is shown in brackets.
  • UNHCR As of 31 July 2019

    UNHCR As of 31 July 2019

    SOMALIA SITUATION Population of concern to UNHCR as of 31 July 2019 MILLION MILLION 811,275 2.65 35,040 3.58 SOMALI REFUGEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED IN SOMALIA REFUGEES AND ASYLUM-SEEKERS PERSONS OF CONCERN ASYLUM-SEEKERS Banadir 19% hosted in Somalia SOMALIA SITUATION Bay 10% hosted in neighbouring countries Ethiopia 21,295 Sool 9% Kenya 257,079 Gedo 8% Yemen Internally displaced Somalis * 13,153 Internally displaced Somalis 2.65M Ethiopia 257,283 Bari 7% Yemen 250,653 Lower Juba 6% Other countries 592 SomalSi roemfuagleie rse afundg eaessy launmd- 811,275 Mudug 6% saeeskyelursm-seekers Uganda 32,535 Galgaduud 5% Somali returnees Djibouti 13,125 Refugee returnees 90,024 Lower Shabelle 5% Eritrea 600 * Togdheer 5% Refugees and asylum-seekers 90,225 Refugees and asylum-seekers * Ethiopia as of 31 Aug 2018; Eritrea as of 30 June 2019 Woqooyi Galbeed 4% in Somalia 35,040 Other regions 15% SOMALI REFUGEE RETURNEES AGE AND GENDER COMPOSITION [2014 - 2019] As of July 2019, Somalia was host to 35,040 registered of refugees and asylum-seekers Estimated IDP statistics, Somalia Information Management Working Group, June 2018 39,990 refugees and asylum seekers, mainly from Ethiopia and Yemen. 58% 81% 36,747 Z CHILDREN ^Z WOMEN & REASONS FOR DISPLACEMENT Over 90,000 Somali refugees have voluntarily returned to below 18 yrs CHILDREN Drought related 54% Somalia since December 2014 with UNHCR assistance from Conflict/Insecurity 30% different countries of asylum including Kenya, Yemen, Djibouti, 39% 3% 10,753 Libya, Tunisia and Eritrea. In addition, some 42,000 Somalis \^ ADULTS ` ELDERLY Flood 12% 2,735 18-59 yrs above 60 yrs were monitored as arriving from Yemen since March 2015.
  • Gedo Intercluster Initial Investigation – September

    Gedo Intercluster Initial Investigation – September

    INTER -AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION OF SOMALIA JANUARY 2017 INTER-AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION – JANUARY 2017 Table of contents Executive summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Key findings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Recommendations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Acronyms, abbreviations and definitions of Somalia terminologies --------------------------- 6 Acknowledgement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Introduction /context of the inter-agency assessment -------------------------------------------- 8 Methodology ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 Assessment findings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Impact of drought ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Findings by cluster ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Food Security and Livelihoods --------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Education ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Nutrition -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Water, Sanitation
  • Somalia: Drought and Displacement

    Somalia: Drought and Displacement

    U.S. Department of State Unclassified [email protected] http://hiu.state.gov HUMANITARIAN INFORMATION UNIT Somalia: Drought and Displacement DJI. Gulf of Aden DJI. Gulf of Aden Awdal Somaliland Bari Awdal Somaliland Bari Sanaag Sanaag Woqooyi Puntland Woqooyi Puntland Galbeed Area disputed Galbeed Area disputed between Somaliland Togdheer between Somaliland UNHCR identied safe Togdheer and Puntland areas of return and Puntland Sool Internally displaced Sool ETHIOPIA persons (IDP) due to Nugaal drought (Nov ’16 - Feb ’17) Nugaal IPC acute food insecurity phase Somali refugee (Feb - May 2017) returnees* ETHIOPIA (1 Jan ’16 - 17 Mar ’17) 3: Crisis Mudug 30k Mudug 4: Emergency 20k Areas with less than 50% normal Provisional administrative line 15k Provisional administrative line Oct-Dec 2016 rainfall 10k Galguduud INDIAN 5k Galguduud INDIAN OCEAN OCEAN Bakool Hiiraan Bakool Hiiraan KEN. SOMALIA KEN. SOMALIA An estimated 1.1 million IDPs Gedo Gedo currently live in Somalia, with Shabeellaha As a result of below average Shabeellaha Dhexe Dhexe about 192,000 additional people have Bay April-June 2016 rains followed by a Bay been displaced since November 2016 failed October-December 2016 rainy due to drought. Most people displaced by Jubbada Jubbada Mogadishu season in many areas, over 2.9 million Dhexe Mogadishu recent drought left rural parts of Bay, Dhexe people in Somalia face acute food Shabeellaha Banaadir Shabeellaha Banaadir Mudug, and Lower Shabelle and settled in Hoose insecurity and will need emergency food Hoose urban areas. IOM and other UN agencies aid in the coming months. In most areas, estimate that the number of IDPs, a highly October-December 2016 rainfall was late, vulnerable group in Somalia, will rise to 3 million Jubbada erratic, and below average.
  • DOCC Joint Mission Report: Kismayo, Lower Juba Region, 16-17 July 2017

    DOCC Joint Mission Report: Kismayo, Lower Juba Region, 16-17 July 2017

    DOCC Joint Mission Report: Kismayo, Lower Juba Region, 16-17 July 2017 I. Situation Overview Kismayo district which hosts Kismayo town, the state capital of Lower Juba, is a pastoral district divided into 3 livelihood zones; southern inland pastoral, comprised mostly of camels, goats/sheep and cattle rearing, southern rainfed which specializes in maize, cattle and goats rearing and Juba pastoral which specializes in cattle and goat rearing. The areas around Kismayo in Lower Juba mostly fall under the pastoral livelihood zone as well. The drought conditions that persist and the poor Gu rains have not replenished the pastures well enough, however, there is some pasture rejuvenation that came with the coastal rains around Kismayo. Reports indicate that the poor rains inland are seeing an increase in surrounding pastoralists migrating towards the greener pastures of Kismayo. The already depleted pastures will not be able to sustain the increase in livestock till the Deyr rains, putting livestock, the main livelihood of the area at risk. Drought conditions persist due to the poor Gu rains that prevailed in most parts of Lower Juba, impacting negatively on access to food, water and pastures. The poor harvests and deaths of livestock has seen a migration of the rural population from Lower Juba and Middle Juba into Kismayo town in search of better livelihoods. There are also people who fled from surrounding areas, particularly Middle Juba, where humanitarian partners have no access, due to conflict in Al Shabaab controlled areas. To date, there are 63,774 IDPs in Kismayo, an increase of 17,742 (61%) from 46,032 in November 2016.
  • (I) the SOCIAL STRUCTUBE of Soumn SOMALI TRIB by Virginia I?

    (I) the SOCIAL STRUCTUBE of Soumn SOMALI TRIB by Virginia I?

    (i) THE SOCIAL STRUCTUBE OF SOumN SOMALI TRIB by Virginia I?lling A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London. October 197]. (ii) SDMMARY The subject is the social structure of a southern Somali community of about six thousand people, the Geledi, in the pre-colonial period; and. the manner in which it has reacted to colonial and other modern influences. Part A deals with the pre-colonial situation. Section 1 deals with the historical background up to the nineteenth century, first giving the general geographic and ethnographic setting, to show what elements went to the making of this community, and then giving the Geledj's own account of their history and movement up to that time. Section 2 deals with the structure of the society during the nineteenth century. Successive chapters deal with the basic units and categories into which this community divided both itself and the others with which it was in contact; with their material culture; with economic life; with slavery, which is shown to have been at the foundation of the social order; with the political and legal structure; and with the conduct of war. The chapter on the examines the politico-religious office of the Sheikh or Sultan as the focal point of the community, and how under successive occupants of this position, the Geledi became the dominant power in this part of Somalia. Part B deals with colonial and post-colonial influences. After an outline of the history of Somalia since 1889, with special reference to Geledi, the changes in society brought about by those events are (iii) described.
  • Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment August 2017

    Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment August 2017

    DADAAB RETURNEE CONFLICT ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2017 PREPARED FOR DANISH DEMINING GROUP (DDG) BY KEN MENKHAUS Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment | i Foreword and Acknowledgements This conflict assessment was implemented as part of the UK Department for International Development (DFID) funded and Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) and Danish Refugee Council (DRC) implemented project: ‘Promoting Durable Solutions through Integrated Return, Reintegration and Resilience Support to Somali Displacement affected Populations’. The project aims to support conditions conducive for safe and dignified return and sustainable reintegration of Somali refugees. The project was implemented between October 2016 and June 2017. The Conflict Assessment was implemented by the Danish Demining Group (DDG), under the supervision of Mads Frilander. The principal investigator and author of the study is Ken Menkhaus, and he alone is responsible for any errors or misinterpretations in the report. He and Ismahan Adawe formed the research team that conducted fieldwork for this study in Mogadishu, Kismayo, Baidoa, and Nairobi in December 2016 and January 2017. The analysis combines existing studies and reports collected in a literature review with over 60 field interviews, as well as a survey carried out in Kismayo. The interviews were semi-structured in format, some held with key informants and others with focus groups of men and women representing host communities, internally displaced persons (IDPs), and returnees. The survey was carried out by the company Researchcare Africa. The research was conducted in challenging security and political conditions, and the research team is deeply indebted to many individuals and organisations who provided essential help to overcome those obstacles. We are also very grateful to the hundreds of Somali stakeholders and international aid officials who volunteered their time to meet with the research team and discuss these issues.