2.1 Million + Nugaal

CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENTAWDAL CLUSTER BARI SOMALIA JANUARYSANAAG 2018 WOQOOYI GALBEED TOGDHEER SOOL OPERATIONAL PRESENCE OF CLUSTER PARTNERS BENEFICIARIES REACHED AS OF JANUARY 2.1 MILLION + NUGAAL

Bossaso ⛳☀ 1.1m people newly displaced in Somalia since January 2017 AWDAL

AWDAL BARI BARI  CCCM has currently 9 active partners focusing on areas with the highest levels SANAAG of urban displacement and implementing comprehensive CCCM projects in WOQOOYI MUDUG WOQOOYI Baidoa, Kismayo, Dollow and Garowe. GALBEED SANAAG TOGDHEER GALBEED SOOL General  CCCM works closely with Shelter, Protection and WASH clusters to develop ⛳☀ integrated packages for service provision in sites to ensure people have Hargeysa TOGDHEER update NUGAAL access to lifesaving services that meet minimum standards GALGADUUD SOOL  A joint mission to Dollow was conducted by the National CCCM cluster and Garowe ⛳☀ UNICEF emergency section to visit IDP sites as part of the Taskforce to address

! ! malnutrition in IDP sites. Galgaduud Nugaal 1 MUDUG (!2 NUGAAL (! Adado Garowe  New arrivals in Baidoa are estimated at 7,000 individuals (PRMN) in January BAKOOL

! HIRAAN DKH, CPD ACTED 2017. Service provision has not increased to address the growing population.

Galgaduud 2 Key gaps highlighted by CCCM include Health, Wash and Shelter. GALGADUUD (! ! ! Dhuusamarreeb Gaalkacyo ⛳☀ Mudug !3  CCCM partners in Kismayo conducted CCCM training for 30 local authorities MUDUG ( GEDO MIDDLE DKH, CPD Galkaacyo Camp and site leaders. SHABELLE ! BAY ! DKH, CPD, DRC, UNHCR BAKOOL Management HIRAAN Bay (!5  A house-to-house population count was conducted in Kabasa and Qansaxlay Baidoa sites in Dollow in partnership with camp leadership and local authorities. BANADIR ACTED, DRC, IOM, ! GEDO MIDDLE AVORD, NRC GALGADUUD  CCCM partners in Baidoa conducted a WASH gap analysis in partnership with Gedo 1 BAY SHABELLE (! ! the WASH cluster. This gap analysis has helped to kick start the improvement LOWER Dollow MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE IOM of WASH service provision in Baidoa. BANADIR !  The Baidoa CCCM Sub Cluster led a joint verification exercise and verified 323 LOWER BAKOOL MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE ! HIRAAN IDP sites, an increase of 18 sites since last month. GEDO  Service mapping were completed in Baidoa and Garowe and inform on ! Individuals reached Baidoa Sub Clusters which partners provide key services at sites. This allows CCCM partners to ⛳☀ Individuals reached MIDDLE flag duplication in activities and gaps in services. LOWER BAY SHABELLE LOWER ! JUBA 0 0 0 0 JUBA 0 0 0 0 00 0 0  The sub clusters in Kismayo held their first cluster meeting to provide an 0 0 0 0 00 0 Lower Shabelle , ,0 , ,0 ,,0 ,0 ,0 !3 0 0 5 5 55 5 5

! ( 6 9 6 9 6 9 61 4 9 > > 1 4 Afgooye overview of CCCM activities and cluster mandate to humanitarian partners > 0 > 0 > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >0 0 > , , 0 0 ! 0 8 0 0 0, , 0 ⛳☀ BANADIR 3 6 5 5 ! AVORD, SYPD, NRC ,0 ,0 09 6 0 providing services in sites. 8 0 ,0 1 ,0 Mogadishu 3 6 5 5 Banadir (!6 9 6 1 LOWER Mogadishu  CCCM partners continue to roll out Detailed Site Assessment to cover the MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE AVORD, DKH, DBG majority of districts within Somalia. The DSA will be complemented by the DRC, UNHCR, NRC Comprehensive Site Assessments (household level surveys). These are being STRATEGIC INDICATORS launched in key districts with highest levels of displacement to get more IM #1 # of sites with established CCCM mechanisms accurate data.  A Risk Criteria is being developed through a collaborative inter cluster Target: 1,600* sites; Achieved: 607 sites ⛳☀ ⛳☀ Coordination hubs approach to highlight sites that are the most vulnerable and need immediate

Kismayo (!# Number of partners LOWER ! ! humanitarian support. Displaced People in Sites 1.6 M Displaced People reached 983,000 JUBA Lower Juba (!2 Mogadishu IOM, UNHCR Partners with ongoing activities Baidoa IOM, UNHCR *Based on an estimated 2,000 sites in Somalia, targeting 80% Kismayo Cluster Coordination IOM, UNHCR Kismayo IOM, UNHCR IOM, ACTED Partners presence per district #2 # of sites covered by the Detailed Site Assessment Hargeisa UNHCR Communication with Communities ACTED, DRC, IOM Galkaacyo UNHCR Garowe UNHCR Construction of community spaces AVORD, NRC Target: 89 Districts Achieved: 24 Districts 1 2 4 6 Bossasso UNHCR > > > 1 2 4 Coordination and monitoring of service delivery ACTED, IOM #1 # of sites with established community participation structures Conducting Detailed Site Assessments CRS, NRC, REACH, UNHCR Target: 1,600 Achieved: 1,289 Integrated CCCM/ Shelter/Protection Projects AVORD, DRC, DKH, NRC, SYPD, UNHCR #2 # of displaced people with access to information about Site planning and improvement AVORD, DKH, IOM, NRC, SYPD humanitarian services Training and capacity building of camp committees AVORD, DKH, DRC, IOM, NRC, UNHCR Target: 1.5 M Achieved: 1.1 M (! A(!WDAL (! DETAILED SITE ASSESSMENT UPDATE (! (! (! BARI (! (! SANAAG (! SOMALIA WOQOOYI JANUARY 2018 GAL(!BEED (! TOGDHEER (! (! (! SOOL IDP SITES ASSESSED SINCE SEPTEMBER DSA PARTNERS COVERAGE (! (! The Detailed Site Assessment is an inter-cluster and inter-agency initiative (! NUGAAL that aims to strengthen the predictability and effectiveness of multi sectorial (! interventions at site level and/or areas of concentration of sites. !!! (! A(!WDAL (! AWDAL (!45 (! BARI BARI (! (! SAN(!AAG SANAAG (! (! Purpose: (! WOQOOYI MUDUG ! 13 WOQOOYI !!!! !!!! ! ! GALBEED (! !! !! ( !!! !! !! (! Provide multi sector information on access/availability to basic services in GALBEED (! TOGDHEER (! (! (!19 TOGDHEER (! SOOL SOOL displacement sites to acertain gaps in service provision and monitor services (!23 ! (! ! ! (!21 (! !!! (! being provided to ensure minimum standards are being met. !! (! NUGAAL 13 (! (! GALGADUUD NUGAAL (! Methodology: (!60 (! !! !!! (! !!! The DSA is implemented by partner’s organisations who are already ! MUDUG MUDUG B(!AKOOL HIRAAN !! ! (! operating in a specific location. The questionnaire is administered by a trained !! ( 6 (! (! (! (! (! enumerator to a key informant. Two key informants are interviewed for each 13 !!! (! (! (! GALGADUUD GALGADUUD site: one camp leader and one women’s representative. The assessment uses GEDO (! (! M!IDDLE ! ( !!! 113 BAY SHA(!BELLE a grid search pattern to ensure that all sites within the district are visited. (! (! 7 ! (! (! !!! BAKOOL (! BAKOOL (! HIRAAN HIRAAN !! (! (! (! ! (! (! 1 (! BANADIR CCCM Cluster partners have carried the Detailed Site Assessment in 24 (! (! (!10 (!265 (! ! !!! 3 GEDO !(! ! GEDO ( ( Districts as of January and are identifying partners for data collection in 20 (! MIDDLE LOWER M(!IDDLE BAY SHABELLE BAY SHABELLE Site location Site type Site expansion Land ownership CWC WASH Shelter ! MIDDLE JUBA(! SHABELLE districts. (!4 (! (! !! Site location ! Site type Site expansion (! Land ownership CWC WASH Shelter 106 (! ! (! ! ! ! ( !!!! 81% !!!!!!!!!!! BANADIR (! BANADIR The data fromPrivate the Detailed Site Assessment1354 can be found online at: https:// (!5 ! ! 7.00% 81% ( 10% 915 (! Private (! 1354 22% LOWER (! LOWER 7.00% 10% cccm-cluster-somalia.github.io/OPSMAP/ MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE 22% MIDDLE JUBA SHABELLE Local authority 63 47% (! (! 44% Local authority 63 47% 10 44% Number of sites 56% 53% (! (! DSA None 52 RoundOther 1 Round 2 Total reached !! in each dist56%rict 53% None 52 Other Federal government 78% LOWER(! 16% 78% 1 > 30 Federal government Districts assessed 10 14 93.00% 24 90% 16% 78%of verified sites JUBA Federal government None !!! 40 !!! None 93.00% 90% 3% LOWER (! Federal goverLnOmWeEnRt(!40 DSA Coverage Indicative IDP population 126 3% are spontaneous Local authority Sufficient info on services received Potable water available Sites JwhereUBA shelter(! 30 > 125 JUBA Local authority (! DSA CoverageSufficieIntd inicfaot iovne sIeDrPvi cepos pruecelatiivoend Potable water available Sites where shelter Planned Spontaneous no yes Sites assessed Pri vate1,527 Insu 224fficien t info on services received 1,751Pota ble water not available support was received 165,000 > 485,800 Other 21 Planned Spontaneous no yes Other 21 Private Covered Insufficient info on services received Potable water not available support was received 165,000 7> 548,05,0800> 165,000 Sites where shelter DSA Round 1 125 > 265 Covered Planned 75,000> 31605,,70000 > 75,000 Sites where shelter Individuals reached 1,118,089 431,741 1,549,830 support was not received Planned 30,700 >6 705,000 >0 30,700 !!!(!(!(!(! 600 > 30,700 support was not received ((((! DSA Round 2 265 > 915 UnUancaccecessssiblele

SITE KEY FINDINGS

Site Management Site location# Sites per districtSite type SiteSite location locationSiteSite expansion locationSiteSite type type Site type SiteSiteLand expansion expansion ownershipSite expansion Site locationLandLandCWC ownershipownershipSiteLand ManagementSite ownershipSite type locationWASH Site expansionCWCCWCSite typeShelterCWC Site# WASHexpansionWASHSites perWASH Landdistrict ownershipShelterShelterShelterLand ownershipCWC CWCWASH ShelterWASH Shelter

81% 81%81% 81% 81% 81% Private PrPrivateivate 1354 Private 1354 Private7.00% 1354 1354 7.00%7.00% 10%7.00% Private 10%10%1354 10% 7.00%1354 7.00% 10% 10% 22% 22%22% 22% 22% 22%915 No management 43% 915 No management 43% Local authority 63 LLooccalal a auutthhoorrityityLocal63 63authority 63 47% Local authority 6347%47% 47%Local authority 63 47% 47% 44% 44%44% 44% 44% 44% Residents 18% Residents 18% 56% 53% 53% 53% 53% O56%t56%her 56% 56% 53% 56% 53% None 52 NNoonnee 5522 None 52 OOtthheerr Other None 52 Other None 52 Other Federal government 16% 78% 16% 16% 78% 78% Community leader FFeeddeeraral lg goovveerrnFnemmd16%eenranttl government 78% 265 Federal government Federal government 265 16% 78% 16% 78%18% INGO Community leader 18% None 93.00% 93.00% 90%93.00% 126 113 90%90% 90% 93.00% 90% INGO 126 Federal government 40 FFeeddeeralral g gooververnnFmmeedenentralt go4040vernment 40 NNoonnee None 93.00% 60 FederalNo gnoevernment 40 None 93.00% 90% 113 3% Local authority Federal government 40 45 13 7 6 60 45 3%3% 3% Local authority 3% 3% Local authority 13 7 6 LocalS uafficiuthoernitty info on services reLceLoocalicalve da auutthhoorrityityLoPcalota abulteh woratityer available SufficieSitesnt in fwhereo on s eshelterrvices received Potable water available Sites where shelter Local authority Sufficient info on services received Potable water available Sites where shelter 17% Community leaderSSuufficifficieenntt in inffoo o onn s seerrvviceicess r reececeiviveedd PPootatabbllee wwatateerr avavaaiillaabbllee LSitesSitesocal whereawhereuthor shelterishelterty Sufficient info on services received Potable water available Sites where shelter Local authority 17% Planned Spontaneous no yes Planned OtheSrponta21neous Privateno yes Insufficient info on services received PrPivateotable water not available Insufficisupportent info was on sreceivedervices received Potable water not available support was received support was received Community leader PPlalannnneedd SSppoonntatanneeoouuss nono yesyes OOtthheerr 2211 Other 21 PPrPrivateilvateanned Spontaneous InInssuufficifficieenPntlt ain innnofnfooe o donn s syeseerrSvvpicicoeenss tar renecceeeoiviuvesedd PPootatabblleeOno wwthatateererr yes nnoo2tt1 avaiavaillaabbllee Psupportsupportrivate wasOwasth e receivedreceivedr 21 InsufficiPreinvatet info on services received InsufficiPeontat inblfeo woatn seerr nvoicte avais reclaebivled supportPotable wwasate receivedr not available Residents Sites where shelter Residents INGO 2% SitesSites wherewhereSites sheltershelter where shelter Sites where shelter Sites where shelter INGO 2% No management support was not received support was not received support was not received No management supportsupport waswas notnot receivedreceived support was not received

Site Management # Sites per district SiteSite Management ManagementSite Management ## SitesSites perper# Sites districtdistrictSite per Management district Site Management # Sites per district # Sites per district

No management 43% 915 915 No management 43% 915915 No management 43% 915 NNoo m maannaaggeemmeenntt 43%43% No management 43% 915 Residents 18% Residents 18% Residents 18% RReesisdeidenntsts 18%18% Residents 18% Community leader 18% 265 INGO Community leader 265 265 18%126 IN11GO3 265265 Community leader 18% CCoommmmuunnitiyty l eleaaddeerr 1818%% 60 Community leader 126 113 INGO 265 Local authority ININGGOO 45 13 7 6 60 18% INGO 126 113 Local authority 126126 111133 45 13 7 6 126 113 60 45 Local authority 17% 6060 4545 Local authority 60 13 7 6 Community leader Local authority LLoocalcal a auuththoorirtyity 1313 77 66 45 13 7 6 17% Community leader Local auLtohcalori tyauthority 17% LoLocalcal a auuththoorirtyity 1717%% Local authority Community leader Residents CCoommmmuunnitiyty l eleaaddeerr 17% Community leader INGO 2% Residents Residents No management INGO 2% RReessidideenntsts No management ReINsiGdeOnts 2% ININGGOO 2%2% INGO 2% No management NNoo ma mannaaggeemmeenntt No management