Assessment of Water Quality Impacts from Potential Land Development Deep Creek Lake Garrett County, Maryland URCES MANAGEMENT URCES

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of Water Quality Impacts from Potential Land Development Deep Creek Lake Garrett County, Maryland URCES MANAGEMENT URCES REPORT Assessment of Water Quality Impacts from Potential Land Development Deep Creek Lake Garrett County, Maryland URCES MANAGEMENT URCES May 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL RESO ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Resources Management 350 Eagleview Blvd., Suite 200 Exton, PA 19341 www.erm.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 LIST OF FIGURES 2 LIST OF TABLES 4 1. SUMMARY 6 2. DEEP CREEK LAKE DATASETS AND WATERSHED LOADS 8 2.1. DATA INVENTORY 8 2.1.1. GIS and Mapping 9 2.1.2. Water Quality 9 2.1.3. Flow Data 11 2.1.4. Water Surface Elevation Data 14 2.1.5. Land Use 14 2.2. RUNOFF FLOW AND LOAD ESTIMATES 16 2.2.1. Runoff Flow Estimates 16 2.2.2. Load Estimation Methodology 18 3. VOLLENWEIDER ANALYSIS 31 4. ANALYSIS OF FIELD DATA 33 4.1. CARLSON’S TSI SCORES 33 4.2. THE NITROGEN TO PHOSPHORUS RATIO 37 5. BATHTUB MODEL APPLICATION AND RESULTS 40 5.1. MODEL INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 40 5.1.1. Parameters and Constants 40 5.1.2. Precipitation Data 42 5.1.3. Land Use and NPS Data 43 5.1.4. Algorithm Selection 44 5.2. MODEL RESULTS AND EUTROPHICATION ASSESSMENT 46 6. CE-QUAL-W2 MODEL APPLICATION AND RESULTS 51 6.1. BATHYMETRY, GRID AND ENGINEERING FEATURES 52 6.2. TIME VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITION DATA 56 6.2.1. Meteorological data 56 6.2.2. Inflow and outflow rates and the water surface elevation 57 6.2.3. Inflow temperatures 58 6.3. CE-QUAL-W2 SIMULATIONS AND RESULTS 59 6.3.1. Circulation patterns and stratification 59 6.3.2. Residence Time and Water Age 62 6.3.3. Total suspended solids 64 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 70 8. REFERENCES 73 APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY 76 APPENDIX B: METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING LAND USE ACREAGES 77 APPENDIX C: WATER QUALITY DATA 78 APPENDIX D: COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSES 79 DEEP CREEK LAKE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT PAGE 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Deep Creek Lake and tributaries .................................................... 8 Figure 2-2 Youghiogheny River Flow Record ............................................... 12 Figure 2-3 Youghiogheny Watershed and USGS Station 3076500.............. 13 Figure 2-4 USGS Flow gauges in the vicinity of Deep Creek Lake (source: USGS, 2006)......................................................................................................... 14 Figure 2-5 Existing and potential land uses for Deep Creek Lake (source: MDP 2006)........................................................................................................... 15 Figure 2-6 Deep Creek Lake sub-watersheds ................................................ 18 Figure 2-7 Existing and projected total phosphorus NPS loads for Deep Creek Lake .......................................................................................................... 29 Figure 2-8 Existing and projected total nitrogen NPS loads for Deep Creek Lake...................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 3-1 Vollenweider analysis for each scenario (source: Vollenweider, 1975) ..................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 4-1 Deep Creek Lake chlorophyll a concentrations (source: MDE) 34 Figure 4-2 TSI scores based on 2000-2003 chlorophyll a values (source: MDE).................................................................................................................... 35 Figure 4-3 Deep Creek Lake secchi depth measurements (source: MDE). 36 Figure 4-4 TSI scores based on 2000-2003 secchi depth values (source: MDE).................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 4-5 Deep Creek Lake total phosphorus concentrations (source: MDE).................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 4-6 TSI scores based on 2000-2003 total phosphorus values (source: MDE).................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 4-7 Total nitrogen vs. total phosphorus – Deep Creek Lake (1999 to 2000) ..................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 4-8 Total nitrogen to total phosphorus ratio frequency histogram 39 Figure 5-1 Precipitation record (2002-2005) at NCDC Station Oakland 1 SE, Oakland, Maryland............................................................................................ 42 Figure 5-2 Total yearly precipitation (2002-2005) at NCDC Station Oakland 1 SE, Oakland, Maryland .................................................................................. 43 Figure 6-1 Deep Creek Lake and tributaries .................................................. 53 Figure 6-2 Deep Creek Lake CE-QUAL-W2 grid showing longitudinal segments.............................................................................................................. 55 Figure 6-3 Side view of the grid representing the main branch of Deep Creek Lake .......................................................................................................... 55 Figure 6-4 Summary of total inflow (cms) to Deep Creek Lake for 2005... 57 Figure 6-5 Hydropower outflows (cms) from Deep Creek Lake for 2005 . 58 Figure 6-6 Observed (blue) and computed (red) water surface elevation. 58 Figure 6-7 Observed and computed tributary temperatures. ..................... 59 Figure 6-8 Typical winter temperatures in Deep Creek Lake (19 Jan 2005) ............................................................................................................................... 61 DEEP CREEK LAKE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT PAGE 2 Figure 6-9 Typical early spring temperatures in Deep Creek Lake (12 April 2005) ..................................................................................................................... 61 Figure 6-10 Typical, stratified, mid-summer temperatures in Deep Creek Lake (15 August 2005) ....................................................................................... 62 Figure 6-11 Typical late fall (near-overturn) temperatures in Deep Creek Lake (21 Oct 2005) .............................................................................................. 62 Figure 6-12 Water age during a period of high inflow................................. 63 Figure 6-13 Water age during a period of low inflow and stratification ... 64 Figure 6-14 Upstream TSS concentrations – Base and Moderate Development Scenarios..................................................................................... 67 Figure 6-15 Downstream TSS concentrations – Base and Moderate Development Scenarios..................................................................................... 67 Figure 6-16 Upstream TSS concentrations – Base and Rapid Development Scenarios.............................................................................................................. 68 Figure 6-17 Downstream TSS concentrations – Base and Rapid Development Scenarios..................................................................................... 68 Figure 6-18 Upstream TSS concentrations – Base and Capacity Cases...... 69 Figure 6-19 Upstream TSS concentrations – Base and Capacity Cases...... 69 DEEP CREEK LAKE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT PAGE 3 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 2005 estimated Deep Creek Lake watershed land use areas (source: MDP)..................................................................................................... 15 Table 2-2 Sub-watershed drainage areas surrounding Deep Creek Lake . 16 Table 2-3 USGS station summary .................................................................... 17 Table 2-4 2002 CBP Phase 5 Watershed Model Land Use in the Deep Creek Lake Watershed, Garrett Co., MD ................................................................... 20 Table 2-5 Comparison of MDP to CBP land use area estimates.................. 20 Table 2-6 CBP land use proportions by MDP Land Use .............................. 22 Table 2-7 CBP nutrient and solids nonpoint source load rates (Mandel, 2006) ..................................................................................................................... 22 Table 2-8 Existing Case (2005) – Deep Creek Lake sub-watershed land use areas ..................................................................................................................... 23 Table 2-9 Moderate Growth Scenario – Deep Creek Lake sub-watershed land use areas ..................................................................................................... 24 Table 2-10 Rapid Growth Scenario – Deep Creek Lake sub-watershed land use areas .............................................................................................................. 25 Table 2-11 Capacity Analysis Scenario – Deep Creek Lake sub-watershed land use areas ..................................................................................................... 26 Table 2-12 Existing Case (2005) – Nonpoint source load estimates by sub- watershed............................................................................................................ 27 Table 2-13 Moderate Growth Scenario – Nonpoint source load estimates by sub-watershed............................................................................................... 27 Table 2-14 Rapid Growth Scenario – Nonpoint source load estimates by sub-watershed .................................................................................................... 28 Table
Recommended publications
  • Celebrating Deep Creek Lake's Anniversary
    Celebrating th Deep Creek Lake’s 95 Anniversary Written by: Dan Whetzel Deep Creek is Maryland’s largest freshwater lake and Western Maryland’s premier recreational destination site, was to provide hydroelectric power for the Pennsylvania as each year thousands of vacationers enjoy the four-season Electric Power Corporation of Johnstown, Pennsylvania. activities the lake offers. The increasing popularity of Approximately 8,000 acres of land were purchased to begin Deep Creek Lake has caused many changes over the years, the project, including 140 farms. An ambitious under- especially in the development of lakefront property. As taking, a new rail connection from the B&O Railroad in Deep Creek Lake approaches its 95th year, let us take a Oakland, Maryland, became necessary to transport heavy trip down memory lane to an earlier time when the region equipment and materials to the excavation site. A quarry remained a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered by for stone crushing provided raw materials for the dam work, vacationers. while steel bridges were erected to accommodate rising Ground was broken for Deep Creek Lake on November 1, waters and vehicle traffic around the water. After months 1923. Its name was derived from a stream located between of planning and construction, the hydroelectric plant went Roman Nose Ridge and Marsh Hill Ridge, and its purpose on line in May, 1925. Anniversary Deep Creek Lake with Glendale Bridge in the foreground. PHOTO BY LANCE BELL Pennsylvania Power Company, commonly referred to as Penelec, owned the land at least as far back as a line estab- Not all of the original hydroelectric plans came to be lished at elevation 2,466, plus 25 lineal feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Creek Lake State Park Martin O’Malley 898 State Park Road John R
    Deep Creek Lake NRMA Resource Guide ______________________________________ Deep Creek Lake Hydroelectric Development Recreation and Environment On March 22, 1922, preliminary surveys began in Garrett County on the waterpower possibilities of the Youghiogheny River. The Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Company had been granted the rights to construct several dams across Deep Creek and the Youghiogheny River. The surveys showed that building the Deep Creek dam was feasible and should be done first, as it would be economically self-sustaining. Since then the dam was built and has changed ownership several times. Currently, the dam and powerhouse are owned and operated by Brookfield Renewable Power. The lake was created for hydroelectric generation, yet has become a recreation Mecca for many outdoor enthusiasts. Construction History • Preliminary surveys began March 22, 1922 • Construction work began November 1, 1923 • Lake began to fill January 10, 1925 • Power plant began operation July 6, 1925 Power Plant The Power Plant is a three story, brick, concrete and steel structure containing two 12000 H.P. Allis-Chalmers Generators. The difference in elevation between the intake at the dam and the turbines is 440 feet at water surface elevation of 2,462 feet above sea level. The generators transmit 115,000 volts. The tailrace is 400 feet long, while the concrete, horseshoe-shaped tunnel is 7, 150 feet long. The plant also contains two steel penstocks with diameters of six feet and length of 685 feet, and one steel surge tank with a diameter of 35 feet and height of 53 feet. The elevation of the lake bottom at tunnel intake is 2,410.5 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREG-2179, Volume 2, "Environmental Impact Statement
    NUREG-2179, Vol. 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for the Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Final Report Chapters 9 to 12 Appendices A to N U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of New Reactors Washington, DC 20555-0001 Regulatory Branch Baltimore District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers State College, PA 16801 NUREG-2179, Vol. 2 Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for the Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Final Report Chapters 9 to 12 Appendices A to N Manuscript Completed: March 2016 Date Published: April 2016 Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Regulatory Division Baltimore District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers State College, PA 16801 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for the Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Lead Agency: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Cooperating Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Contact: Tomeka Terry, Environmental Project Manager Environmental Projects Branch Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: 301-415-1488 e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This environmental impact statement (EIS) has been prepared in response to an application submitted on October 10, 2008 to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by PPL Bell Bend, LLC (PPL) for a combined construction permit and operating license (combined license or COL). PPL notified the NRC of changes in its power generation business by letter dated May 12, 2015 (NRC Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Garrett County Comprehensive Plan
    2008 Garrett County Comprehensive Plan Adopted October 7, 2008 Acknowledgements The Garrett County Planning Commission expresses its appreciation to the many people, agencies and organizations that provided information, ideas and input for this plan. Garrett County Commissioners Dennis G. Glotfelty, Chairman Ernest J. Gregg Frederick A. Holliday R. Lamont Pagenhardt, County Administrator Garrett County Planning Commission Troy Ellington, Chairman Ruth Beitzel George E. Brady Tony Doerr Gary Fratz Joe McRobie Jeff Messenger Tim Schwinabart Frederick Holliday, Ex Officio Garrett County Planning and Land Development Office John Nelson, Director Planning Staff Bill DeVore Chad Fike Deborah Carpenter Louise Weimer Contributing Agencies Steve Sherrard, Jim Hinebaugh, Director, Linda Lindsey, Director, Garrett County Health Garrett County Economic Department of Public Utilities Department Development Gary Mullich, Director, General Cheryl DeBerry, Duane Yoder, Community Action Services Agricultural Specialist, Garrett Committee, Inc. County Economic Development Jay Moyer, General Brad Frantz, Director, Carolyn Mathews, Superintendent, County Roads Department of Public Safety and Maryland Department of Natural Department Emergency Management Resources Consultant Team Environmental Resources Management, Annapolis Whitman Requardt & Associates, Baltimore Special thanks to Stephanie Martins at the Maryland Department of Planning The preparation of this report was financed through local Garrett County revenue funds and in part through grants from
    [Show full text]