DOCSLIB.ORG

Best District Best Block Best PHC Bikaner Jaipuri (Amber) Ajmer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best District Best Block Best PHC Bikaner Jaipuri (Amber) Ajmer Kvisoft PDF Merger DEMO : Purchase from www.kvisoft.com to remove the watermark State top performers-August 2020 Best District Best Block Best PHC Bikaner JaipurI (Amber) Ajmer (Ramsar) District, Block & PHC Ranking August 2020 District Rank District Best Block in District Best PHC in District 1 Bikaner Loonkaransar Raner Damolai 2 Kota Itawa Bapawarkalan 3 Hanumangarh Nohar Jhakhrawali 4 Ganganagar Gharsana 11 P patroda 5 Pali Jaitaran Khinwara 6 Jaipur I Amber Pragpura 7 Baran Chhipabaro Relawan 8 Jaisalmer Sankara Devikot 9 Ajmer Pisangan Ramsar 10 Bundi Talera S Mandi 11 Dholpur Dholpur Marena 12 Sirohi Reodar Anadara 13 Banswara Partapur Khodan 14 Chittorgarh Begun Dindoli 15 Pratapgarh Pipalkhunt Suhagpura 16 Bhilwara Gulabpura Swaipur 17 Nagaur Degana Sankhwas 18 Tonk Todaraisingh Nagarfort 19 Sawai Madhopur Sawai Madhopur Baler 20 Jaipur II Chaksu Madhorajpura 21 Rajsamand Deogarh Barar 22 Jhalawar Jhalrapatan Gangdhar 23 Bharatpur Sewar Sevar 24 Sikar Laxmangarh Mangluna 25 Karauli Gudachandraji Sherpur 26 Jodhpur Shergarh Aagolai 27 Barmer Sindhary Bharkha 28 Jalore Bhinmal Kagmala 29 Udaipur Gogunda Kheroda 30 Churu Rajgarh Bhaleri 31 Jhunjhunu Chirawa Devrod 32 Dausa Lalsot Khedala Bujurg 32 Dungarpur Bichiwara Bankora 34 Alwar Mundawar Partapgarh Ajmer: District & PHC Rankings (August 2020) District Rank Ajmer 9 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC Phase OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Ajmer Srinagar Ramsar Phase 1 141 72 100% 100% 96 14 18 5 1 2 Ajmer Kekri Baghera Phase 1 150 16 100% 100% 93 13 25 15 2 3 Ajmer Pisangan Saradhna Phase 1 144 101 100% 100% 91 15 0 16 3 4 AJMER Pisangan Govindgarh Phase 2B 101 22 100% 100% 88 7 0 31 4 5 Ajmer Masooda Kharwa Phase 1 82 23 0% 100% 92 14 22 52 5 6 Ajmer Jawaja Rajiyawas Phase 1 69 30 0% 100% 80 12 28 53 6 7 AJMER Masooda Jaliya II Phase 2B 59 31 0% 100% 86 14 19 69 7 8 Ajmer Kishangarh Karkedi Phase 1 92 17 0% 100% 91 15 0 113 8 9 Ajmer Bhinai Devliyakalan Phase 1 42 15 0% 100% 89 13 31 117 9 10 AJMER Kekri Para Phase 2B 71 13 0% 100% 96 9 17 142 10 11 AJMER Bhinai Badali Phase 2B 33 25 14% 100% 80 15 0 172 11 12 AJMER Jawaja Kotra Phase 2B 27 13 0% 100% 92 13 18 196 12 13 AJMER Bhinai Shingawal Phase 2A 49 10 0% 100% 87 14 14 196 13 14 AJMER Srinagar Tihari Phase 2B 42 30 0% 100% 90 0 0 243 14 15 AJMER Arain Dadia Phase 2B 30 8 43% 60% 93 11 0 298 15 16 AJMER Kekri Junia Phase 2B 86 3 0% 0% 90 14 20 312 16 0 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Ajmer: District & PHC Rankings (August 2020) No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC Phase OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 17 AJMER Kishangarh Kuchil Phase 2B 32 7 0% 0% 90 15 26 356 17 18 AJMER Jawaja Kishanpura Phase 2B 33 5 0% 0% 85 13 26 409 18 19 AJMER Srinagar Narwar Phase 2B 53 3 0% 0% 89 7 15 508 19 20 Ajmer Bhinai Sarana Phase 1 38 7 0% 17% 95 8 2 515 20 21 AJMER Arain Gothiyana Phase 2B 17 1 0% 0% 95 4 23 611 21 22 AJMER Arain Hingoniya Phase 2B 21 7 0% 40% 95 0 0 630 22 23 AJMER Pisangan Baghsuri Phase 2A 32 1 0% 0% 84 0 13 750 23 24 Ajmer Arain Jhirota Phase 1 26 1 0% 0% 93 0 0 789 24 1 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Alwar: District & PHC Rankings (August 2020) District Rank Alwar 34 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC Phase OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Alwar Thanagazi Partapgarh Phase 1 108 74 100% 100% 82 0 0 41 1 2 ALWAR Thanagazi Ajabgarh Phase 2B 50 13 67% 100% 80 0 9 207 2 3 Alwar Rajgarh Gola ka bas Phase 1 76 17 0% 100% 73 11 0 217 3 4 ALWAR Ramgarh Bamboli Phase 2A 35 17 0% 100% 79 0 17 295 4 5 ALWAR Tijara Jairoli Phase 2B 19 21 0% 100% 79 0 0 366 5 6 ALWAR Kherli Mandi Kalwari Phase 2B 36 3 57% 0% 66 9 28 371 6 7 ALWAR Reni Bileta Phase 2B 36 1 24% 0% 78 13 30 373 7 8 Alwar Tijara Ishroda Phase 1 34 0 55% 0% 81 11 19 386 8 9 ALWAR Rajgarh Khodreb Phase 2A 55 2 0% 0% 77 14 20 432 9 10 Alwar Reni Machari Phase 1 50 4 0% 0% 76 10 27 438 10 11 ALWAR Malakhera Shayam Ganga Phase 2B 44 0 29% 0% 88 0 29 482 11 12 ALWAR Kishangarhbas Ismilepur Phase 2B 33 6 18% 20% 94 0 14 504 12 13 Alwar Kotkasim Jodiya Phase 1 52 2 33% 0% 82 4 13 505 13 14 ALWAR Kotkasim Bibirani Phase 2A 61 0 0% 0% 83 10 11 534 14 15 Alwar Malakhera Chandoli Phase 1 19 12 0% 9% 84 0 27 536 15 16 Alwar Mundawar Jat Bahror Phase 1 97 1 0% 0% 80 0 14 544 16 17 ALWAR Kotkasim Pur Phase 2A 22 0 16% 0% 76 9 25 557 17 18 ALWAR Reni Jamdoli Phase 2A 19 0 0% 0% 78 10 29 564 18 19 ALWAR Kherli Mandi Khokar Phase 2A 21 0 0% 0% 74 10 27 585 19 20 ALWAR Behror Gandala Phase 2A 53 0 0% 0% 83 11 5 588 20 2 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Alwar: District & PHC Rankings (August 2020) No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC Phase OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 21 ALWAR Tijara Jhiwana Phase 2B 23 7 15% 40% 82 0 0 633 21 22 ALWAR Thanagazi Kishori Phase 2A 44 1 0% 0% 63 13 9 640 22 23 Alwar Shahjanpur Manjri Kala Phase 1 50 4 0% 0% 75 10 0 642 23 24 ALWAR Laxmangarh Eteera Phase 2A 19 0 0% 0% 68 10 24 646 24 25 ALWAR Mundawar Jindoli Phase 2A 43 1 0% 0% 92 8 0 658 25 26 ALWAR Shahjanpur Kaysha Phase 2B 18 0 80% 0% 65 0 4 696 26 27 ALWAR Behror Tasing Phase 2B 44 0 19% 0% 86 0 6 701 27 28 ALWAR Malakhera Baleta Phase 2B 24 0 0% 0% 79 0 23 731 28 29 Alwar Behror Bhetera Phase 1 30 0 0% 0% 79 0 18 752 29 30 Alwar Laxmangarh Harsana Phase 1 41 3 0% 0% 68 0 12 762 30 31 Alwar Bansur Karana Phase 1 42 6 0% 20% 64 0 0 766 31 32 ALWAR Laxmangarh Mojpur Phase 2B 22 0 0% 0% 78 0 17 770 32 33 ALWAR Shahjanpur Manjra Phase 2A 30 0 0% 0% 66 8 0 790 33 34 Alwar Kherli Mandi Ramnagar Phase 1 38 0 0% 0% 48 0 23 792 34 35 ALWAR Rajgarh Rajpurbara Phase 2A 33 2 0% 0% 80 0 0 802 35 36 ALWAR Mundawar Bijwad Chouhan Phase 2A 23 0 0% 0% 84 0 0 813 36 37 ALWAR Bansur Hamirpur Phase 2B 15 0 0% 0% 87 0 0 816 37 38 Alwar Kishangarhbas Bagherikala Phase 1 21 0 17% 0% 64 0 0 824 38 3 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Banswara: District & PHC Rankings (August 2020) District Rank Banswara 13 No of Days % OPD % Del Drug Test State District Sr. No. District Block PHC Phase OPD/Day Del/Mon reported Change Change Availability Availability Rank Rank attendance 1 Banswara Partapur Khodan Phase 2B 77 29 0% 100% 93 14 31 30 1 2 Banswara Bagidora Sallopat Phase 2A 84 141 0% 100% 84 14 26 36 2 3 Banswara Bagidora Shergarh Phase 1 64 25 0% 100% 90 15 27 48 3 4 Banswara Bagidora Nogama Phase 1 68 33 0% 100% 81 15 22 53 4 5 Banswara Choti Sarwan Danpur Phase 1 96 86 10% 100% 63 0 27 98 5 6 Banswara Anandpuri Naharpura Phase 1 50 35 14% 100% 65 15 5 131 6 7 Banswara Ghatol Khamera Phase 1 91 222 5% 100% 93 0 0 142 7 8 Banswara Chota Dungara Kasarwadi Phase 1 52 81 0% 100% 62 0 24 207 8 9 Banswara Bagidora Badodia Phase 2B 52 15 0% 100% 75 6 19 233 9 10 Banswara Talwara Nayagaon Phase 1 79 11 0% 38% 79 13 19 246 10 11 Banswara Partapur Anjana Phase 2A 28 37 0% 100% 54 13 0 252 11 12 Banswara Talwara Mahidam Phase 2B 46 46 0% 100% 72 0 0 282 12 13 Banswara Chota Dungara Tambesra Phase 2A 29 19 71% 100% 58 0 0 287 13 14 Banswara Choti Sarwan Ghoditejpur Phase 2B 60 48 0% 100% 56 0 0 298 14 15 Banswara Ghatol Bassi Aada Phase 2A 49 39 0% 100% 63 0 0 300 15 16 Banswara Kushalgarh Mokhampura Phase 2A 25 18 0% 100% 79 0 0 375 16 4 Copyright © by 2017 The Boston Consulting Group, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characteristics of Pegmatoidal Granite Exposed Near Bayalan, Ajmer District, Rajasthan
    Characteristics of pegmatoidal granite exposed near Bayalan, Ajmer district, Rajasthan Nilanjan Dasgupta1,∗, Taritwan Pal2, Joydeep Sen1 and Tamoghno Ghosh1 1Department of Geology, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata 700 073, India. 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, IIT Kharagpur, Midnapore, West Bengal, India. ∗e-mail: [email protected] The study involves the characterization of pegmatoidal granite, southeast of Beawar, Ajmer district, Rajasthan. Earlier researchers had described this granite as part of the BGC, basement to the Bhim Group of the Delhi Super Group rocks. However, the present study indicates that it is younger than the rocks of Bhim Group of South Delhi Fold Belt, into which it is intrusive. The intrusion is structurally controlled and the outcrop pattern is phacolithic. The granite had intruded post-D2 deformation of the Delhi orogeny along the axial planes of D2 folds. The intrusion has also resulted in the formation of a contact aureole about the calc gneisses. 1. Introduction host rocks by this emplacement have been studied. An attempt is made to fix the time of emplacement A long geological history since Middle Archaean with respect to the different deformational events is recorded in the Precambrian belt of Rajasthan. of the Delhi orogeny. The rocks of the study area fall within the The granites were earlier classified as basement ‘Delhi System’, defined in the pioneering study of rocks of pre-Delhi age (Heron 1953; Gupta 1934), Heron (1953), and now rechristened as the Delhi which is contrary to the present findings. Supergroup (Gupta and Bose 2000 and references therein) (figure 1). Within the study area around the small village of Bayalan, 10 km southeast of Beawar in Ajmer district of Rajasthan, pegma- 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Paper Dr Anjili Mathur Community Medicine Dr
    VOLUME - 9, ISSUE - 10, October - 2020 • PRINT ISSN No. 2277 - 8160 • DOI : 10.36106/gjra Original Research Paper Community Medicine EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE OF INITIAL COVID-19 PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN SOUTHERN RAJASTHAN Associate Professor, Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Dr Anjili Mathur Udaipur Dr Chandan Assistant Professor, Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Fatehpuriya* Udaipur *Corresponding Author Senior Demonstrator,Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical Dr Shikha Mehta College,Udaipur Dr Vipin Mathur Senior Professor, Dept of Gastroenterology, RNT Medical College,Udaipur Resident Doctor,Dept of Community Medicine, RNT Medical College, Dr Anum Fatima Udaipur Dr Shruti MBBS Priyadarshini ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we aimed to study its epidemiological and clinical characterstics OBJECTIVE: (1)To study epidemiological prole of rst 100 covid cases admitted at DCH MB Hospital. (2)To study progression of disease among these covid-19 cases for 28 days.METHODOLOGY:This is observational cross sectional study of rst hundred COVID-19 cases admitted at DCH, MB Hospital,Udaipur and followed up for 28 days.Data obtained from Case Investigation Form and indoor records.RESULT:Majority were males(60%)Mean age was 35.88 years in males and 35.99 years in females.History of contact present in 62% and travel in 13%.41% were symptomatic and 14% had comorbidity.Recovery had no signicant relation with gender,symptoms or comorbidity.Progression was good and CFR was 1%.CONCLUSION: Recovery and progression was good among the patients,need to avoid travel and contact with others was noticed and people with comorbidities required to be more alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Banswara District
    Banswara District Hydrogeological Atlas of Rajasthan Banswara District Contents: List of Plates Title Page No. Plate I Administrative Map 2 Plate II Topography 4 Plate III Rainfall Distribution 4 Plate IV Geological Map 6 Plate V Geomorphological Map 6 Plate VI Aquifer Map 8 Plate VII Stage of Ground Water Development (Block wise) 2011 8 Location of Exploratory and Ground Water Monitoring Plate VIII 10 Stations Depth to Water Level Plate IX 10 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Table Elevation Plate X 12 (Pre-Monsoon 2010) Water Level Fluctuation Plate XI 12 (Pre-Post Monsoon 2010) Electrical Conductivity Distribution Plate XII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Chloride Distribution Plate XIII 14 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Fluoride Distribution Plate XIV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Nitrate Distribution Plate XV 16 (Average Pre-Monsoon 2005-09) Plate XVI Depth to Bedrock 18 Plate XVII Map of Unconfined Aquifer 18 Glossary of terms 19 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP DISTRICT – BANSWARA Location: Banswara district is located in the extreme southern part of Rajasthan. It is bounded in the North by Dungarpur and Pratapgarh districts, in the west by Dungarpur district, in the East by state of Madhya Pradesh and South by state of Gujarat and. It stretches between 23⁰03' 22.98” to 23⁰ 55' 31.36” north latitude and 73⁰ 57' 12.92’’ to 74⁰ 46' 22.15’’ east longitude covering area of 4,493 sq km. Major part of the district has a systematic drainage system, as whole region is the part of ‘Mahi River Basin’. Administrative Set-up: Banswara district is administratively divided into ten Blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre–Feasibility Report
    PRE–FEASIBILITY REPORT Development of 8 lanes (Greenfield Highway) from Itawa (Ch. 284.000) to after Chambal River Banda Hera (Ch. 392.800) Section of NH-148 N (Total length 108.800 Km), Under BHARATMALA PRIYOJANA Lot-4/Pkg-4 in the state of Rajasthan June 2019 DISCLAIMER This report has been prepared by DPR Consultant on behalf of NHAI for the internal purpose and use of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MOEF&CC), Government of India. This document has been prepared based on public domain sources, secondary and primary research. The purpose of this report is to obtain Term of Reference (ToR) for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for Environmental Clearance to develop the Economic Corridors and Feeder Routes to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojana, Section of Lot 4/Pkg 4: Firozpur Jhirka – Kota section. It is, however, to be noted that this report has been prepared in best faith, with assumptions and estimates considered to be appropriate and reasonable but cannot be guaranteed. There might be inadvertent omissions/errors/aberrations owing to situations and conditions out of the control of NHAI and DPR Consultant. Further, the report has been prepared on a best-effort basis, based on inputs considered appropriate as of the mentioned date of the report. Neither this document nor any of its contents can be used for any purpose other than stated above, without the prior written consent from NHAI. Feasibility Report Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Introduction to the project ..................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Project Proponent ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District Census Handbook, Bikaner, Rajasthan
    CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 RAJASTHAN DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK BIKANER DISTRICT C. S. GUPTA OF THE INDlAN ADMINlS'l'RATlVE: SERVICE Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan Printed by Mafatlal Z. Gandhi. at Nayan Printing Preis. Ahmedabad-I. FOREWORD The Census data has always been considered as indispensable for day to day administration. ] t is increasingly being considered now as the foundation stone or' all regional planning. The publication of this series of District Census Handbooks wherein census statistics is made available for smaller territorial units is. therefore~ a significant occasion for it fills many existing gaps in statistics at the lower levels. Many interesting details have been revealed by the Census 1961 and I hope persons engaged in the administration of the State and public in general will appreciate the value and the effort that has gone into the production of such a standard book of reference. 1 congratulate the Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthan, Shri C. S. Gupta I. A. S. and his colleagues who have done a good job with skill and perseverence. B. MEHTA JAIPUR, Chief Secretary 1st March, 1966. to the Government of Rajasthan. iii PREFACE The District Census Handbooks, to which series the present volume belongs. are the gifts of the Census of India and were first introduced in 1951. The 1961 series of District Census Handbooks are more elaborate than their counter-part in 1951 and present all important cen,slls data alon~with such other basic information as is very relevant for an understanding of the district. A wide variety of information which the Census 1961 collected: has already been released in several parts as mentioned elsewhere in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): a Comparative Analysis
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 8, August 2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Economics of Milk Production in Alwar District (Rajasthan): A Comparative Analysis G. L. Meena* and D. K. Jain** * Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, MPUAT, Udaipur (Rajasthan) ** Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, NDRI, Karnal (Haryana) Abstract- This study covered 75 cooperative member milk 1. To compare the cost and return of milk production producers and 75 non-member milk producers which were post- among different herd size categories of households stratified into small, medium and large herd size categories. Per across member and non-member in different seasons. day net maintenance cost was found to be higher for member 2. To compare the production, consumption and marketed group than that of non-member group. It was found to be higher surplus of milk among different herd size categories of in case of buffalo than that of cow and also observed more in the households across member and non-member in different summer season. Per litre cost of buffalo and cow milk production seasons. was observed to be higher for the non-member as compared to member group. Per litre cost of buffalo milk production decreased with increase in herd size categories across different II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE seasons while same trend was not observed in case of cow milk Attempts have been made to review briefly the specific and production. Further, it was found higher in summer season. Daily relevant literature, which has direct or indirect bearing on the net return was found relatively higher in member group as objectives of the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Onset of Southwest Monsoon – 2010
    INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT (MINISTRY OF EARTH SCIENCES) SOUTHWEST MONSOON-2013 END OF SEASON REPORT For the state of RAJASTHAN Compiled By Dr. O.P. Singh, Scientist-F S.S. Singh, Scientist-F R.N. Kumawat, S.A. Ashok Kumar Sharma, S.A. 1 HIGHLIGHTS For the country as a whole, the rainfall for the season (June-September) was 106% of its long period average (LPA). However, for North West India this figure came out to 129% and 127% for the state of Rajasthan. Seasonal rainfall was 127% of its LPA over East Rajasthan and 128% of its LPA over West Rajasthan. Southwest Monsoon current advanced over the Andaman Sea 3 days earlier than its normal date of 20th May and set in over Kerala on its normal date of 1st June. The southwest Monsoon set over South Eastern parts of the state on 13th June, about 2 days early. It progressed further very rapidly and covered the entire state by 16th June, about 1 month earlier than its normal date of 15th July. The withdrawal of Monsoon from west Rajasthan commenced on 9th September compared to its normal date of 1st September. After 19th, further withdrawal of southwest Monsoon was stalled for about one month with the successive formation of two low pressure areas and their westward movement across the central parts of the country. The Monsoon withdrew from the whole state on 17th October, 2013, delay of about 22 days from the LPA. Monthly rainfall over the state was 138% of LPA in June, 127% of LPA in July, 133% of LPA in August and 104% of LPA in September.
    [Show full text]
  • District Profile Pali, Rajasthan
    District Profile Pali, Rajasthan Pali District has an area of 12,387 km². The district lies between 24° 45' and 26° 29' north latitudes and 72°47' and 74°18' east longitudes. The Great Aravali hills link Pali district with Ajmer, Rajsamand, Udaipur and Sirohi Districts. The district has 10 blocks, as recorded in 2014—Jaitaran, Raipur, Sojat, Rohat, Pali, Marwar Junction, Desuri, Sumerpur and Bali. DEMOGRAPHY As per Census 2011, the total population of Pali is 2037573. The percentage of urban population in Pali is 22.6 percent. Out of the total population there are 1025422 males and 1012151 females in the district. This gives a sex ratio of 987 females per 1000 males. The decadal growth rate of population in Rajasthan is 21.31 percent, while Pali reports a 11.94 percent of decadal increase in the population. The district population density is 164 in 2011. The Scheduled Caste popula- tion in the district is 19.53 percent while Scheduled Tribe comprises 7.09 percent of the population. LITERACY The overall literacy rate of district is 62.39 percent while the male & female literacy rate is 76.81 and 48.01 percent respectively. At the block level, a con- siderable disparity is noticeable in the male-female literacy rate. Pali block has the highest male literacy rate of 82.56 percent and female literacy rate of 57.09 percent. Similarly, the lowest male and female literacy rate is found in Bali (71.58 percent) and Jaitaran (41.62 percent) blocks respectively. Source: Census 2011 A significant difference is notable in the literacy rate of rural and urban Pali.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Scenario Baran District
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL GROUND WATER BOARD GROUND WATER SCENARIO BARAN DISTRICT WESTERN REGION JAIPUR 2013 GROUND WATER SCENARIO BARAN DISTRICT S. No. Item Information 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical area (sq. km) 6955.31 Administrative Divisions a. No. of tehsils / blocks 08/07 b. No. of villages 1114 inhabited 126 non habited c. No. of towns 4 d. No. of municipalities 4 Population (as per 2011 census) 1222755 Average annual rainfall (mm) (2001 - 707 2011) 2. GEOMORPHOLOGY Major physiographical Units Hill ranges of Vindhyans in the northeast and low rounded hills of Malwa plateau in the south bound the region. Sedimentary rocks of Vindhyan Supergroup occupy northwestern part. Major Drainage The drainage system is well developed and represented by Chambal, which is perennial in nature. 3. LAND USE (ha) (2010-11) Forest area 216494 Net sown area 338497 Cultivable area (net sown area + 366348 fallow land) 4. MAJOR SOIL TYPES 1. Deep black clayey soil 2. Deep brown loamy soil 3. Red gravelly loam hilly soil 5. AREA UNDER PRINCIPAL CROPS (ha) (2010-11) Food grains Bajra : 3472 Jowar : 2006 Wheat : 147930 Barley : 559 Rice : 8231 Maize : 16913 Total Pulses 10872 Total Oil seeds 311473 Total Condiments & Spices 67818 6. IRRIGATI ON BY DIFFERENT Net Area irrigated Gross area SOURCES (ha) irrigated Canal 54485 57488 S. No. Item Information Tank 2376 3137 Tubewells 191558 200258 Other wells 28252 28293 Other sources 16052 16820 Total 292723 306626 7. NUMBER OF GROUND WATER MONITORING WELLS OF CGWB No. of dug wells 20 No. of piezometers 1 8. PREDOMINENT GEOLOGICAL Upper Vindhyan, Bhander Group, FORMATIONS Ganurgarh shales, Bhander limestone and Bhander sandstone overlain by Deccan traps and alluvium of Quaternary age.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Pearl Millet Varieties with Farmers in Barmer District
    \ EVALUATING PEARL MILLET VARIETIES WITH FARMERS IN BARMER DISTRICT M.K. Choudhary, E. Weltzien R., and M.M. Sharma ABSTRACT A newly formed NGO, operating in Barmer district in western Rajasthan, applied and modified methods of farmerparticipatory variety evaluation develop by ICRISA Tscientists in otheri'egions of Rajasthan. Barmer district has the largest area under pearl millet of all the Indian districts; it is characterized by low and erratic annual rainfall. The first year results of varietal evaluations with farmers indicated that farmers from Barmer district assigned the two highest ranks to varieties with medium to late maturity, large panicles andhigh yieldpotential. The farmers from the more sandy, drierareas of Barmerdistrict didprefer higher tillering, earliermaturir~yvarieties, commonly with larger grain size as a secondary group of desirable materials. The traits used to compare varieties most often were also the characteristics of the most preferred varieties. Farmers insisted on at least one more year of such evaluations before a decision on initial adoption of any of these varieties could be taken. INTRODUCTION The Society to Uplift Rural Economy (SURE) has recently begun to manage and direct a Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), a farmer training center, with the approval of Ihe Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). In collaboration with ICRISAT, the KVK has started a program to identify cultivars of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] suitable for cultivation in Barmer district. Barmer district has no previous research results on the adaptation of newly released varieties of pearl millet.' The current program was designed to evaluate a broad range of genetic diversity on the KVK-farm and on farmers' fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Circle District Location Acc Code Name of ACC ACC Address
    Sheet1 DISTRICT BRANCH_CD LOCATION CITYNAME ACC_ID ACC_NAME ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3091004 RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA 5849/22 LAKHAN KOTHARI CHOTI OSWAL SCHOOL KE SAMNE AJMER RA9252617951 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3047504 RAKESH KUMAR NABERA 5-K-14, JANTA COLONY VAISHALI NAGAR, AJMER, RAJASTHAN. 305001 9828170836 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3043504 SURENDRA KUMAR PIPARA B-40, PIPARA SADAN, MAKARWALI ROAD,NEAR VINAYAK COMPLEX PAN9828171299 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3002204 ANIL BHARDWAJ BEHIND BHAGWAN MEDICAL STORE, POLICE LINE, AJMER 305007 9414008699 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3021204 DINESH CHAND BHAGCHANDANI N-14, SAGAR VIHAR COLONY VAISHALI NAGAR,AJMER, RAJASTHAN 30 9414669340 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3142004 DINESH KUMAR PUROHIT KALYAN KUNJ SURYA NAGAR DHOLA BHATA AJMER RAJASTHAN 30500 9413820223 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3201104 MANISH GOYAL 2201 SUNDER NAGAR REGIONAL COLLEGE KE SAMMANE KOTRA AJME 9414746796 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3002404 VIKAS TRIPATHI 46-B, PREM NAGAR, FOY SAGAR ROAD, AJMER 305001 9414314295 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3204804 DINESH KUMAR TIWARI KALYAN KUNJ SURYA NAGAR DHOLA BHATA AJMER RAJASTHAN 30500 9460478247 [email protected] Ajmer RJ-AJM AJMER Ajmer I rj3051004 JAI KISHAN JADWANI 361, SINDHI TOPDADA, AJMER TH-AJMER, DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN 305 9413948647 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • THEIR OWN COUNTRY :A Profile of Labour Migration from Rajasthan
    THEIR OWN COUNTRY A PROFILE OF LABOUR MIGRATION FROM RAJASTHAN This report is a collaborative effort of 10 civil society organisations of Rajasthan who are committed to solving the challenges facing the state's seasonal migrant workers through providing them services and advocating for their rights. This work is financially supported by the Tata Trust migratnt support programme of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Allied Trusts. Review and comments Photography Jyoti Patil Design and Graphics Mihika Mirchandani All communication concerning this publication may be addressed to Amrita Sharma Program Coordinator Centre for Migration and Labour Solutions, Aajeevika Bureau 2, Paneri Upvan, Street no. 3, Bedla road Udaipur 313004, Ph no. 0294 2454092 [email protected], [email protected] Website: www.aajeevika.org This document has been prepared with a generous financial support from Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and Allied Trusts In Appreciation and Hope It is with pride and pleasure that I dedicate this report to the immensely important, yet un-served, task of providing fair treatment, protection and opportunity to migrant workers from the state of Rajasthan. The entrepreneurial might of Rajasthani origin is celebrated everywhere. However, much less thought and attention is given to the state's largest current day “export” - its vast human capital that makes the economy move in India's urban, industrial and agrarian spaces. The purpose of this report is to bring back into focus the need to value this human capital through services, policies and regulation rather than leaving its drift to the imperfect devices of market forces. Policies for labour welfare in Rajasthan and indeed everywhere else in our country are wedged delicately between equity obligations and the imperatives of a globalised market place.
    [Show full text]