DOCSLIB.ORG

The Trinity, What Is Revealed in the Bible?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Trinity, What Is Revealed in the Bible? The Trinity, What is Revealed in the Bible? by Blair Andrew The Questions What is it about human nature, that causes us to think we are right in everything we believe? Why are the vast majority of Christians deceived; believing error, such as the doctrine of the immortality of the soul, or the teaching of eternal hellfire, or the “secret rapture”? None of these doctrines have their foundation in the Bible, but millions believe them. What are the forces at play that bring us to believe something? What is a belief? How does that become a doctrine? What are the underlying pre-suppositions of doctrines, that cause people to debate, argue, fight – and eventually kill over them? The purpose of doctrine is to bring us to Christ, to keep us walking in the light that leads to the true saviour, and not a counterfeit. How is that millions believe things which are purely based on traditions, and have no basis in truth? What are the factors that cause us to become emotionally attached to something, to the point that we turn on our friends, and make them enemies? These are the questions that need to be answered, as you look at the doctrine of the Trinity, for its history is marred with the blood of martyrs. The Trinity, is there any Biblical Evidence? There are so many unanswered questions about the Trinity Doctrine. The most obvious is, where in the Bible is it explained? Scholars throughout history have acknowledged that it is not even found in the Bible. Just ask Erasmus, or Sir Isaac Newton. They were known for their clear thinking, for their genius and Biblical scholarship, but neither accepted the idea. So where did it come from? Let us take a brief look at what the Seventh-day Adventist Church currently teach in regard to the Trinity doctrine. From our official work, “Seventh-day Adventists Believe . .” written by the Ministerial Association: "In contrast to the heathen of surrounding nations, Israel believed there was only one God (Deut.4:35;6:4; Isa.45:5; Zech14:9). The New Testament makes the same emphasis on the unity of God . This monotheistic emphasis does not contradict the Christian concept of the triune God or Trinity - Father, Son and Holy Spirit; rather it affirms that there is no pantheon of various deities. Although the Old Testament does not explicitly teach that God is triune, it alludes to a plurality within the Godhead" . "While the Godhead is not one in person, God is one in purpose, mind and character. This oneness does not obliterate the distinct personalities of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Nor does the separateness of personalities within the Deity destroy the monotheistic thrust of Scripture, that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God." Seventh-day Adventists Believe . A Biblical Exposition of 27 Fundamental Doctrine, 1988. R & H, pp 22-23. (emphasis supplied) Several points come out of this statement. We know that the word God means deity, or divine; and we see no problem with our Father being called God, and Jesus being called God, because they both are divine, and are related, just as your earthly father and you are related; ie. family. But “mono” mean one. And “tri” means three. So, if God is one, and yet is three divine persons, that again seems to contradict logic. And yet it says that “this monotheistic emphasis does not contradict the Christian concept of the triune God or trinity.” As well as this, it states that the Old Testament does not teach that God is triune, but alludes to a plurality. We need more evidence than alluding to something to build our faith on. All of Adventist’s other doctrinal beliefs are based on clear scriptural exegesis. But it would seem from the above statement that we do not have this for the trinity doctrine. Let us turn for a moment to another official Adventist source, and see if they can shed more light on the topic. Adventist Review: “While no single scriptural passage states formally the doctrine of the Trinity, it is assumed as a fact by Bible writers and mentioned several times. It is implied in Genesis 1, where God and the Spirit of God are portrayed acting in Creation. Only by faith can we accept the existence of the Trinity. Nevertheless, reason supplies evidences that support our belief in God. Through the ages theologians have developed what have become known as the traditional proofs of God. ” Adventist Review, Vol. 158, No.31. July 1981.p.4. (emphasis supplied). So, we have no scriptural passage stating the trinity doctrine, again it is “assumed”, but now we are told it is “assumed as a fact by Bible writers and mentioned several times” by Bible writers. Evidence is not presented in the Review to support this statement, and I have searched elsewhere for it, without success. I cannot find anywhere in Scripture where the doctrine of the Trinity “is assumed as a fact” by any Bible writer. As well as this, I cannot find it “mentioned several times”, but I do agree that there is much we can “only accept it by faith”. The question begs to be asked though, should not our faith rest on evidence? Adventists have been known as “the people of the Book”, who can present and defend our positions on any doctrine. Has God revealed enough evidence about His nature to support the Trinity doctrine? Let us turn to Andrews University and see what their scholarship can produce. The Reign of God, by Richard Rice: “The role of the trinity in a doctrine of God always raises questions. One reason is that the word itself does not appear in the Bible, nor is there any clear statement of the idea. But the Bible does set the stage for its formulation, and the concept represents a development of biblical claims and concepts. So even though the doctrine of the trinity is not part of what the Bible itself says about God, it is part of what the church must say to safeguard the biblical view of God.” The Reign of God, An Introduction to Christian Theology from a Seventh-day Adventist Perspective. by Richard Rice. 1985. Andrews Uni Press. (emphasis supplied) This statement poses some interesting thoughts. Obvious contradictions abound. Rice is saying that although something is not found in Scripture, we should defend it to safeguard it as the Biblical view of God. I may not be an academic, but that type of circular reasoning defies logic, and should never have been put in print, let alone in a Christian text book for University level theology students. Let’s go to a recent work which is often quoted as an authoritative work on the topic. The Trinity, by Moon, Whidden & Reese, Andrews University. “Probably the strongest clues to such a divine triunity occur in the famous gospel commission that Jesus gave the church in its baptismal formula: ‘Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’ (Matt. 28:19).” The Trinity, by Jerry Moon, Woodrow Whidden, & John W. Reese, published by R & H 2002, p.32. (Chapter entitled “The Strongest Biblical Evidence for the Trinity”) (emphasis supplied) We are now told by our three well respected academics that Matthew 28:19 is the “strongest clue” that we have to prove the trinity, when it is not even a text laying out a doctrinal position on the nature of God! Christ is making a statement on Baptism, and we do not find the early church using it in these words anywhere in Scripture. But, it is “strongest clue” we have. Is that the best that God has revealed for us, His remnant people, as the foundation of our faith, in regard to the God whom we worship? Let us look further at some other well known authors. Questions People have Asked Me, by Francis D. Nichol: The Mystery of the Trinity “I confess frankly that I cannot explain how there is but one God and yet three persons in the Godhead. Nor have I ever heard anyone explain it satisfactorily. Yet I believe it.” – Questions People have Asked Me, - F.D. Nichol, p.275. 1959. R & H. Getting Acquainted with God, by Otto H. Christensen: “The word trinity is not in the Bible, but the plurality of the divine triad can be inferred, some think, from the Sacred Record from the very beginning.” Getting Acquainted with God, Otto H. Christensen. p.70. 1970. R & H. No comment is necessary here. Both authors go on to defend the Trinity doctrine, neither presenting Biblical evidence for its existence. Recognised Sources on the origin of the Trinity doctrine Let us now check whether or not there are any scholarly sources outside of Adventism who can give us a clear scriptural basis for the trinity doctrine. The most commonly accessed Encyclopedia on the Internet, Wikipedia, states: “The consensus of Modern exegetes and theologians is that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of Trinity (even though in the past dogmatic tracts texts like Gn. 1:26, Gn. 3:22, 11:7, Is. 6:2-3 were cited as proofs). Further, modern exegetes and theologians agree that the New Testament also does not explicitly contain the doctrine of the Trinity. The Trinity was thrashed out in debate and treatises as a result of continuous exploration of the biblical data, and was eventually formulated at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE.” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John 14:17 and the Holy Spirit in the Gospel of John
    Running head: JOHN 14:17 1 John 14:17 and the Holy Spirit in the Gospel of John Daniel Sloan A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Fall 2011 JOHN 14:17 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Donald Fowler, Th.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Don Love, Th.M. Committee Member ______________________________ Darlene Graves, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ James H. Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date JOHN 14:17 3 Abstract This thesis examines John 14:17, along with other passages in John, and identifies whether or not the disciples were indwelled before Jesus’ glorification or after his glorification. It does this through defining of Holy Spirit terms, a study on the Holy Spirit in John, and word studies on different words throughout John. The conclusion of the paper shows that the Holy Spirit could not indwell the disciples before the glorification of Jesus and gives evidence to show why this could not occur. JOHN 14:17 4 John 14:17 and the Holy Spirit in the Gospel of John Was the Holy Spirit permanently inside of the disciples during the earthly ministry of Jesus, or did he only arrive for a permanent indwelling after Jesus returned to heaven at Pentecost? Many scholars, such as D.A. Carson1, Andreas Köstenberger 2, Larry Pettegrew3, and Leon Morris4, believe that the Holy Spirit only entered the disciples permanently at Pentecost, but there are some, such as Thomas Goodwin, John Owen, B.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Not As Bad As the Truth: the Musings and Memoirs of David Pawson Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    NOT AS BAD AS THE TRUTH: THE MUSINGS AND MEMOIRS OF DAVID PAWSON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Pawson | 256 pages | 20 Apr 2006 | Hodder & Stoughton General Division | 9780340864272 | English | London, United Kingdom Not as Bad as the Truth: The Musings and Memoirs of David Pawson PDF Book David Pawson believes that Christians need very clear biblical understanding before making political pronouncements about conflict in the Middle East. One of the main reasons for this confusion is their handling of the word 'covenant', which is so fundamental to scripture. His teaching is loved and criticised in equal, passionate measures. He argues that modern men too often neglect their social obligations and should return to the Biblical model of manhood. From here his teaching tapes — originally made for the church's sick and elderly members — became popular worldwide. Few theologians speak with such clarity and uncompromising biblical faithfulness as David Pawson. Now in his seventies, he has decided to write what will be one of the most eagerly-received autobiographies of any Find Peace with Meditation: Flash. Jesus: The Seven Wonders of History. Now in his seventies, he has decided to write what will be one of the most eagerly-received autobiographies of any modern-day Christian leader. The book details Pawson's testing of his premonition that Britain would become Islamic. Unavailable Find in Store. Positive, because we have such a rich heritage it would be folly to ignore. Olson Thomas C. This may be a liberal estimate according to saints like St. Pawson left Millmead in and engaged in an itinerant worldwide Bible teaching ministry predominantly through seminars for church leaders in Asia, Australia [4] , Africa, England, Europe, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • I UNTO the THOUSANDTH GENERATION: THE
    UNTO THE THOUSANDTH GENERATION: THE EVANGELICAL IMPORTANCE OF AN ESCHATOLOGY THAT EMBRACES SUFFERING FOR CHRIST by Paul LeFavor B.S., Liberty University, 2008 A THESIS Submitted to the faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Religion at Reformed Theological Seminary Charlotte, North Carolina July 2016 i Accepted: __________________________________ Dr. Bruce Baugus, Thesis Advisor __________________________________ Dr. James Anderson, RTS Academic Dean ii ABSTRACT Paul D. LeFavor Unto the Thousandth Generation Contrary to popular belief, eschatology drives, or at least affects in large measure, one’s evangelical beliefs and efforts. For example, millions of professing Christians believe in a rapture which envisions an escape from tribulation. They ask: How could God allow His church to suffer? Such thinking leaves God’s people unprepared for trials and, for the most part, socially irresponsible. However, Christ tells us to expect tribulation (Jn 16:33) and even rejoice in it (Mt 5:12; cf. 1 Pet 4:12). Another prominent error in the church, which correlates to and is driven by rapture theology, presents us with a separate saving program for the ethnic nation of Israel, leading many Christians, in large measure, to fall short in their evangelistic efforts to Jews. The purpose of this study is threefold: First, to confront issues like these with biblical truth and demonstrate from biblical studies, church history and systematic theology that the phrase “Great Tribulation” is a technical term referring to the end time trial which has already been set in motion by Christ’s first advent and will culminate with His second advent (Acts 14:22; 1 Cor 11:25; Rev 7:14).
    [Show full text]
  • David Pawson
    DAVID PAWSON DAVID David Pawson writes: “In countries where the Church is in decline, what are we going to pray for and what are we going to do about this? I nd that Christians divide into two Completing main groups: those who are waiting for God to do something about it and those who believe God is Luther’s waiting for us to do something about it... I believe that God is waiting for us to do things... Reformation “Luther was not comfortable with the whole Bible; that was one of the roots of his inconsistency. The second failure, which came from that, was REFORMATION LUTHER’S COMPLETING his failure to apply scripture to every part of the Christian life and the church life of his day. There were areas that he did not touch. I believe that God is calling us now... to complete that Reformation and take the whole scripture and apply it to the whole Christian life, the whole of our preaching and the whole of our Church structure.” In this book, David unpacks this theme and provides pointers for the reforms needed in the twenty- rst century. David Pawson has a worldwide teaching ministry, particularly for church leaders. He is known to many through Christian broadcasting and is the author of numerous books. Anchor DAVID Anchor Recordings Ltd www.davidpawson.com PAWSONwww.davidpawson.org Completing Luther’s Reformation Completing Luther’s Reformation DAVID PAWSON Anchor Recordings Copyright © 2017 David Pawson The right of David Pawson to be identified as author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Background Theology
    A Synopsis of the Theological Systems Behind Current UK Church Streams How to see the wood for the trees in today’s evangelical mess. Paul Fahy 2 A Synopsis of the Theological Systems Behind Current UK Church Streams Contents Why is this important? Amyraldism Arminianism Calvinism / Reformed Theology Cessationism Charismatic Theology / Neo Pentecostalism Deeper Life / Higher Life / Victorious Life / Keswick Teachings Deliverance Theology Dominionism 1: Reconstructionism / Theonomy Dominionism 2: Charismatic Kingdom Theology Dispensationalism [Dispensational Premillennialism] Ecumenical Theology & Movements The Emerging Church Federal Vision Fullerism Hyper-Calvinism Humanism Jewish Roots Liberal Theology Modernism Mysticism / New Age New (or Neo) Evangelicalism Neo Orthodoxy [Dialectical Theology or The New Hermeneutic] The New Perspective on Paul / Justification / Judaism Oberlin Theology (Finneyism) / New Haven Theology / New Divinity Occult Theology / Paganism Open Theism Pentecostalism Perfectionism Psychoheresy Quietism Sacramentalism Seeker-sensitive Practices / Church Growth Movement Strategic Level Spiritual Warfare Theology / Territorial Spirits Universalism - No hell as future punishment Conclusion 3 Appendixes Appendix One: The Progress of Charismatic Error Appendix Two: The Jewish Roots Reaction to Extreme Charismaticism Appendix Three: The Eschatological Key to Current Charismatic Factions Appendix Four: The Diminishing of the authority of God’s Word Appendix Five: The Impact of the Mind Sciences Appendix Six: The Rise of
    [Show full text]
  • How “Complementarians” Have Corrupted Communication Kevin Giles
    The Genesis of Confusion: How “Complementarians” Have Corrupted Communication Kevin Giles In the previous edition of Priscilla Papers, my article, “The Genesis harmless. Carefully choosing words to conceal what is actually being of Equality,” outlined the prevailing view that the Bible’s opening taught and to surreptitiously further one’s own agenda, I believe, is chapters make substantial or essential equality of the two sexes the morally wrong. One important responsibility of theologians is to creation ideal, and that the subordination of women is entirely a bring clarity to the issues they address, in part by carefully defining consequence of the fall. I further noted that Pope John Paul II made and consistently using key terms. To write theology in order to this interpretation of Gen 1–3 binding on Roman Catholics. In conceal seems to me perverse. Should not Christians communicate this essay, I move on to discuss four key terms—“role,” “equality,” with each other openly and honestly? “difference,” and “complementary”—which “complementarians” consistently utilize to give a different interpretation of Gen 1–3 and The origins of this obfuscating language of other biblical texts important to their cause. Again, I bring in the For long centuries, how the man-woman relationship was to be Roman Catholic voice to give a wider perspective.1 understood was openly stated and crystal clear. God had made In the mid-1960s, I studied at Moore Theological College Sydney, men “superior,” women “inferior.”6 Woman was created second, a large, evangelical and Reformed seminary. In my four years after man, thus women are second in rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Water, Ritual Spirit: an Analysis of the Timing, Mechanism, and Manifestation of Spirit-Reception in Luke-Acts
    Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk McCollough, David John (2014) Ritual water, ritual spirit: an analysis of the timing, mechanism, and manifestation of spirit-reception in Luke-Acts. PhD thesis, Middlesex University / London School of Theology. [Thesis] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/14649/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preacher's Legacy
    DAVID PAWSON DAVID A PREACHER’S LEGACY The author describes his own journey through di erent kinds of preaching: testimony (experience) preaching; text preaching; concordance sermons; topical preaching; passage preaching; preaching the whole Bible; contextual preaching.... He also LEGACY PREACHER’S A discusses ‘gospel preaching’ and explains his method of discovering the structure of a Bible passage, his preparation for preaching, and the practical aspects of delivering a sermon. He gives an account of the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing conviction. This book will help everyone who preaches and teaches Christianity. David Pawson has a worldwide teaching ministry, particularly for church leaders. He is known to many through Christian broadcasting and is the author of numerous books. DAVID Anchor Anchor Recordings Ltd PAWSON www.davidpawson.com www.davidpawson.org DAVID PAWSON Anchor Recordings Copyright © 2017 David Pawson The right of David Pawson to be identified as author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in Great Britain in 2017 by Anchor Recordings Ltd Synegis House, 21 Crockhamwell Road, Woodley, Reading RG5 3LE No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. For more of David Pawson’s teaching, including DVDs and CDs, go to www.davidpawson.com FOR FREE DOWNLOADS www.davidpawson.org For further information, email: [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Ways of Preaching 9 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th February 1973
    The Devil—fact or fable? The Australian 15 cents A columnist for the Mel- originate in Chi isrs citing of the exist," Rev A. Rebeschini added bourne Herald asked a Devil in the scriptures. "But drily, "then Christ must have today," Dr Thomas added, been talking to Himself." - number of Melbourne theo- "there would be a much broader People stopped in Collins Rev Allan W. M. Lewis, in charge of Rev Guy A. Harrison, chaplain of the logians and then a number interpretation of what He sig- Street expressed a wide variety Kingston-Robe Mission (The Murray) junior section of Canberra Grammar nified by this." of views but two of the five re. since 1968, has been appointed in charge School and assistant master since 1963, ofpeople in the city streets of St Jude's. Port Elliott. retired from early December. whether they thought the The question of the Devil's ported took their stand firmly ha Rev Ian B. Measured. rector of St An- Rev Charles C. Reddock, curate of existence arose because of the the Bible. A female shop assist. drew's, Mann= (The Murray) since Newtownards (dio. of Down) since 1969. Devil was fact or fable. The current writings of the radical ant put it plainly: 1967, has been appointed rector of St has been appointed rector of Beaconsfield Awnestine's. Victor Harbour. and Exeter (Tasmania). results were interesting. teaching of Roman Catholic "Who else did Christ grapple Church Record Registered for posting as Rev Philip T.B. ("Tubby") Clayton, Rev Mervyn R. Stanton, rector of AS priest and professor, Herbert with and overcome but the All the Protestant theologians No 1530 First Published 1880 a newspaper—Category A Fcbntary 8, 1973 founder of the Toe H movement and its 'Saints'.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostles Today
    2 Apostles Today Britain Introduction Britain has historically had its share of titled “apostles” with the Catholic Apostolic Church, the Apostolic Church, the radical House Church movement and today’s apostolic networks. Although Britain and the USA have marked differences, many of the same currents, trends, and cultural shifts that have happened on the American side of the Atlantic have occurred on the British side too. Therefore, it is unsurprising that the increased attention given to apostles in the USA is finding a similar expression in the differentSAMPLE sectors of the church in Britain. As in America, Evangelicals and Charismatics are often more in tune with the latest Evan- gelical or Charismatic fad and opinion then their own denominational view. They will often go to interdenominational Charismatic or Evangelical conferences, read and listen to Evangelical/Charismatic speakers online or via satellite or radio and use material from flagship Evangelical or Char- ismatic churches. Before looking at the different groupings of churches, it is important to highlight certain trends that are affecting Evangelicals and Charismatics of all churchmanships; whether it is through gift courses, or books on leadership, the word about apostles and apostolic ministry is being propagated amongst Charismatics and Evangelicals of all stripes across Britain. 32 © 2014 The Lutterworth Press Apostles Today: Britain One of the most recent “successful” initiatives aiming to help churches grow qualitatively has been Christian Schwarz’ Natural Church Development. Schwarz has purposefully moved away from the numerical emphasis of the Church Growth Movement and focused on qualitative growth—which (in his opinion) inevitably leads to numerical growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinism and Arminianism: Myths and Realities
    Copyright © David de Bruyn, 2017. Used by permission. Calvinism and Arminianism: Myths and Realities David de Bruyn 1 Copyright © David de Bruyn, 2017. Used by permission. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: You may distribute this booklet in electronic format or printed format on the following conditions: (1) It must be distributed free of charge, (2) No alterations are to be made to the text, (3) All copies must contain the following: Copyright © David de Bruyn, 2017. Used by permission. 2 Copyright © David de Bruyn, 2017. Used by permission. “Oh my, don't tell me you're attending that church?”, says your friend. “Yes, I am...Why? What's wrong?”, you ask, a little shaken. “Why, don't you know that they're Michaelists??” Michaelists?, you say to yourself. What is Michaelism? Why have I never heard of this? Why is my friend so concerned? What have I got myself into? “Uh, no, I didn't. What have you heard?” “Well, Michaelists don't believe God loves people. And they believe He wants everyone in Hell. So they don't evangelise. And they don't pray for sinners, or send missionaries.” You swallow hard, and wonder if you've really been so blind. Could it be that your church holds those extreme views? *** This conversation probably happens in various forms hundreds of times a week, around the world. Except the term is not Michaelism, but either Calvinism, or Arminianism. It's really amazing that the Bible warns Christians against slander (Eph 4:31, Jas 4:11, 1 Pet 2:1) and yet so many Christians commit that sin against one another regularly when throwing these terms around.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Biblical History of Charismatic Apostles
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Making sense of contemporary Charismatic Apostolates An historical and theological appraisal McNair Scott, Benjamin Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 This electronic theses or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Title: Making sense of contemporary Charismatic Apostolates An historical and theological appraisal Author: Benjamin McNair Scott The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement.
    [Show full text]