DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Evaluation of Concern and Glencree's Peacebuilding

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Evaluation of Concern and Glencree's Peacebuilding Final Evaluation of Concern and Glencree’s Peacebuilding Intervention in Haiti, 2009-2012 By William Devas Devas Consulting September 2012 Dublin 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations CBO Community Based Organisation CNDDR National Commission for Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration Concern Concern Worldwide DDR Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EU European Union Glencree Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation HCUEP How Concern Understands Extreme Poverty HPCD Haitian Partnership for Christian Development HSI Haitian Stabilisation Initiative KDSM Collective pour le Development de San Martin – a collective of San Martin CBOs Lakou Lape Literally means courtyard of peace MINUSTAH United Nations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti PBP Peacebuilding Partnership Phase 1 Concern and Glencree’s peacebuilding work from 2006 to 2009 Phase 2 Concern and Glencree’s peacebuiling work from 2009 to 2012 i.e. This programme ToR Terms of Reference Track I Peacebuilding efforts focused on a national and more central level involving high- ranking officials and/or institutions. Track II Processes focused on the wider sectoral levels that can involve official leaders and civil society actors with influence in their own communities. Track III Normally focused at the grassroots level, these are activities directed towards conflict transformation and peacebuiding at the community level. WASH Water Sanitation and Hygiene sector 3PM Partnership for Peace and Prosperity of Martissant 3PSM Partnership for Peace and Prosperity of San Martin 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 8 II. The context of the intervention .................................................................................................... 8 III. Intervention Description .......................................................................................................... 8 IV. Evaluation Methodology and Limitations ............................................................................... 9 V. Main Evaluation Findings ........................................................................................................... 10 V.1 Targeting ..................................................................................................................................... 10 V.1.1. Selection process of programme participants ................................................................... 10 V.1.2. Were the most appropriate people targeted? ................................................................... 11 V.1.3 To what extent did the poorest benefit? ............................................................................. 12 V.2 Relevance .................................................................................................................................... 13 V.2.1. How appropriate was the programme to the priority needs of the communities ............. 13 V.2.2. How appropriate was the approach to the local context? ................................................. 13 V.2.3. Impunity dilemma ............................................................................................................... 13 V.2.4. Lack of livelihoods activities to complement training and dialogue .................................. 15 V.2.5 Conflict analysis ................................................................................................................... 16 V.2.6. Changes in attitude and behaviour..................................................................................... 17 V.2.7. Collaborative Actions .......................................................................................................... 18 V.3. Effectiveness .............................................................................................................................. 18 V.3.1. Objective 1: To contribute to reduced levels of violent conflict in urban areas in Haiti .... 18 V.3.2. Objective 2: To contribute to more effective Track II & III peacebuilding in Haiti. ............ 20 V.3.3. Objective 3: To contribute to development/codification of best practice for the transformation of protracted social conflict ................................................................................. 20 V.3.4. Objective 4: To contribute to development of best practice for conflict sensitive interventions in fragile states. ...................................................................................................... 21 V.3.5. Specific Objective: To increase operational capacity of key civil society actors to engage in effective preventive and remedial peacebuilding work in Haiti and to deliver conflict sensitive development and emergency assistance programmes ................................................................ 21 V.3.6. Changes in attitude and behaviour..................................................................................... 23 V.3.7. GBV and domestic violence ................................................................................................ 23 V.3.8. Material change through collaborative actions .................................................................. 24 V.3.9. Early Warning System (EWS) .............................................................................................. 24 V.4. Efficiency .................................................................................................................................... 25 V.4.1. The Concern Glencree partnership ..................................................................................... 25 3 V.4.2. Staffing ................................................................................................................................ 26 V.4.3. Need for greater prioritisation of activities. ....................................................................... 27 V.5. Impact and Sustainability........................................................................................................... 28 V.5.1. Trips to Jamaica and Ireland ............................................................................................... 29 V.6. Accountability ............................................................................................................................ 30 VI. Future Opportunities ....................................................................................................................... 31 VI.1 Conflict analysis ......................................................................................................................... 31 VI.2 Lakou Lape ................................................................................................................................. 32 VI.3 3PSM .......................................................................................................................................... 33 VI.4 Continue .................................................................................................................................... 33 VI.5 Focus on prevention .................................................................................................................. 34 VI.6 Focus on Gender ........................................................................................................................ 34 VI.7 Focus on Livelihoods .................................................................................................................. 35 VI.8 Focus on Mentoring and Accompaniment ................................................................................ 35 VI.9 Expansion of enlarged dialogue ................................................................................................. 35 VI.10 Mainstreaming ......................................................................................................................... 36 VI.11 Area based programming ........................................................................................................ 37 VII. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 38 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Appendix One: Terms of Reference ...................................................................................................... 41 4 Executive Summary This three year EU funded programme was a partnership between Concern and Glencree. Working in the poor slums of San Martin and Martissant in Port au Prince it aimed to contribute to a reduction in violence, improved Track II and III peacebuilding and increased local capacity, as well as codify good practice for transforming protracted social conflict. This was in effect a consolidation of a well-received three year process that had started due to the severe consequences of widespread violence and criminality in San Martin. The underlying approach taken was of training and dialogue complemented with collaborative actions. The intention was to build and expand relationship across the communities resulting in positive changes in the conflict dynamics. The evaluation involved a desk review of relevant programme
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J
    Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J. B. Malone on Walks ~ Cycles ~ Drives compiled by Frank Tracy SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 Listing and Index of Evening Herald Articles 1938 ~ 1975 by J. B. Malone on Walks ~ Cycles ~ Drives compiled by Frank Tracy SOUTH DUBLIN LIBRARIES - OCTOBER 2014 Copyright 2014 Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries ISBN 978-0-9575115-5-2 Design and Layout by Sinéad Rafferty Printed in Ireland by GRAPHPRINT LTD Unit A9 Calmount Business Park Dublin 12 Published October 2014 by: Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries Headquarters Local Studies Section South Dublin Libraries Headquarters County Library Unit 1 County Hall Square Industrial Complex Town Centre Town Centre Tallaght Tallaght Dublin 24 Dublin 24 Phone 353 (0)1 462 0073 Phone 353 (0)1 459 7834 Email: [email protected] Fax 353 (0)1 459 7872 www.southdublin.ie www.southdublinlibraries.ie Contents Page Foreword from Mayor Fintan Warfield ..............................................................................5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................7 Listing of Evening Herald Articles 1938 – 1975 .......................................................9-133 Index - Mountains ..................................................................................................134-137 Index - Some Popular Locations ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Peace Network
    River bends - SPN processes Ripples - sharing learning, spreading influence Rapids - some challenges Reflections - on nature-based peace work 1. Nomination & selection of new participants The contribution of activities in the Wicklow hills (Glencree; Glendalough), the Scottish Highlands I. Introduction/Immersion - connections within new year group “The loch was like a mirror. A group of us were talking and there was a snort and I turned around 2001-2004: Selection by Glencree, but those not selected feel excluded; pressure from key stakeholders (Loch Glendhu; Glen Bruar) and South Africa (Imfolozi wilderness) include: and there was a big seal in the water. The water was so still that the ripples from the seal went 1. Selection & Preparation to nominate own “representatives”. • Defusing tensions out and out and out. I took from it that life is like that - from one thing, lots of other things ripple 2005-2007: Nomination and co-selection of new group by previous group - increased continuity between out and it affects a lot of other people.” year groups, but difficult to include those not represented in nominating group. 2. Working Agreement - participant-generated, constantly reviewed and revised “The wild setting created a 2008+: Nomination by previous group, selection and strategic nominations by expanded facilitation team. • Less distractions 1. Individual participants – spreading learning within own spheres of influence counterfoil for the tough 3. Sharing of life experiences - informally ( joint meals, travelling, walking, social time) and 2. Difficult group dynamics emotionally challenging formally (facilitated small group sharing, large group discussions) 2. “Ripples”organised by/between participants, for example “I love coming away to the work that went on within a) “non-combatants” struggling with dynamics between former combatants; remote places because no one a.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Irish Mountain Passes
    List of Irish Mountain Passes The following document is a list of mountain passes and similar features extracted from the gazetteer, Irish Landscape Names. Please consult the full document (also available at Mountain Views) for the abbreviations of sources, symbols and conventions adopted. The list was compiled during the month of June 2020 and comprises more than eighty Irish passes and cols, including both vehicular passes and pedestrian saddles. There were thousands of features that could have been included, but since I intended this as part of a gazetteer of place-names in the Irish mountain landscape, I had to be selective and decided to focus on those which have names and are of importance to walkers, either as a starting point for a route or as a way of accessing summits. Some heights are approximate due to the lack of a spot height on maps. Certain features have not been categorised as passes, such as Barnesmore Gap, Doo Lough Pass and Ballaghaneary because they did not fulfil geographical criteria for various reasons which are explained under the entry for the individual feature. They have, however, been included in the list as important features in the mountain landscape. Paul Tempan, July 2020 Anglicised Name Irish Name Irish Name, Source and Notes on Feature and Place-Name Range / County Grid Ref. Heig OSI Meaning Region ht Disco very Map Sheet Ballaghbeama Bealach Béime Ir. Bealach Béime Ballaghbeama is one of Ireland’s wildest passes. It is Dunkerron Kerry V754 781 260 78 (pass, motor) [logainm.ie], ‘pass of the extremely steep on both sides, with barely any level Mountains ground to park a car at the summit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Walk Around Ireland - County by County
    A walk around Ireland - County by County This article can do little justice to the beauty and splendor that is Ireland. As we ramble around the country we will briefly mention the places that are of little acclaim - but should not be missed, to the more widely recognized locations you will find in any travel guide. These are the spots this writer has visited and will visit again, but in no way meant to suggest as the best or worst places spend a while. Ireland consists of four provinces: Leinster , Munster, Connacht and Ulster. This is Leinster - Cúige Laighean. Dublin City Co. Dublin, the largest city in Ireland, founded by the Vikings over 1,500 years ago. Being the political and commercial capital of Ireland, you will find the Presidential Residence in the Phoenix Park - the largest city park in Europe, over 1750 acres, within the city limits. Here also are many of the offices for governmental affairs, Trinity College – with the Book of Kells and Brian Boro’s harp, the General Post Office – G.P.O., a key site from the 1916 rising and and a host of museums, theaters and home to Ireland’s most famous export Guinness – at St. James Gate, where you will be able to sample the freshest pint of Guinness on the planet. Pub life is one of Ireland’s attractions and you will find an endless selection of locations to visit – but perhaps start at the “Brazenhead” one of Ireland’s oldest, licensed in 1666 but said to date from the 1300’s.
    [Show full text]
  • KILLAKEE MOUNTAIN, RATHFARNHAM, CO. DUBLIN T: + 353 1 633 3700 APPROX
    Killakee Mountain.qxp_Layout 1 21/07/2017 11:16 Page 1 CONTACT LOCAL ATTRACTIONS Callum Bain e: [email protected] The area is steeped in history, with such attractions as Massey’s Estate, The Wicklow Way, The Hell Fire Club and The Wicklow Mountains National t: +353 1 633 3785 Park. The area is threaded with mountain roads and thus such notable sites as Glendalough, Glencree, Lough Tay, and Powerscourt are easily m: +353 86 811 8367 accessible. ZONING The planning and local authority for the area is South Dublin County Council. The current South County Dublin Development Plan 2016 – 2022, designates the property as being Zoned G3 – conservation, amenity or buffer space, corridor/belt. Local Authority Zoning – HA-DM – To protect and enhance the outstanding natural character of the Dublin Mountains. PSRA No. 001223 TITLE COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL The lands are contained in Folios DN4825F and DN4828F in the register of Freeholders County Dublin. We are advised that there are no rights of Hambleden House way traversing the property. 19-26 Lower Pembroke Street Dublin 2 SERVICES VIEWING BER w: www.colliers.ie Watered by local stream By Appointment Exempt KILLAKEE MOUNTAIN, RATHFARNHAM, CO. DUBLIN t: + 353 1 633 3700 APPROX. 140 HA. (345 ACRES) The above particulars are issued by Colliers International on the understanding that all negotiations are conducted through them. Every care is taken in preparing the particulars which are for guidance only and the Ziamet do not hold themselves liable for any inaccuracies. Maps are not to scale and areas and dimensions are approximate. All reasonable offers will be submitted to the owners for consideration but the contents of this brochure will not be deemed to form the basis of any contract subsequently entered into.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationing in Emergency Ireland, 1939-48
    Rationing in Emergency Ireland, 1939-48 by Ciarán Bryan Thesis for the degree of PhD in History Department of History National University of Ireland Maynooth HEAD OF DEPARTMENT: Professor Marian Lyons Supervisor of Research: Dr Jacinta Prunty September 2014 Contents Acknowledgements ii Abbreviations iv List of figures vi List of tables ix Introduction 1 Chapter I The practical, political, economic, and legislative 22 underpinnings of rationing in Ireland Chapter II Shortages and rationing in Ireland, 1939-45 62 Chapter III State and voluntary welfare mechanisms, 1939-45 129 Chapter IV The Catholic Social Service Conference, 1941-48 187 Chapter V Nutritional science and its social application, 1912-48 230 Chapter VI The Long Emergency, 1945-48 281 Conclusion 323 Bibliography 331 Acknowledgements From start to finish, my supervisor Dr Jacinta Prunty, provided great encouragement, wise counsel and invaluable support that helped me bring this thesis to fruition. I want to record my heartfelt thanks for her unfailing attention, patience and generosity. Our meetings always provided me with plenty of food for thought and thanks to Jacinta’s kindness I rarely left our meetings on an empty stomach. This I think is something of an irony considering the nature of the topic, but it was always a welcome boost! On a more serious note I want to record that as my supervisor Jacinta brought great intellectual rigour tempered with the human qualities of generosity and kindness. Special thanks must also go to Professor R.V. Comerford who encouraged me down this path and to Professor Marian Lyons, Professor Jackie Hill, Professor Raymond Gillespie for their invaluable suggestions and clarity of thought always willingly provided when sought.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencree Peace Education Resource Package Editor Matthew Seebach
    Worlds Apart? Glencree Peace Education Resource Package Editor Matthew Seebach Development Cooperation Ireland Worlds Apart Glencree Peace Education Resource Package Editor Matthew Seebach This is the Glencree Centre for Reconciliation's second Peace Education Resource Package. The first was produced in conjunction with 80:20 Educating and Acting for a Better World and was published in 2000. This new resource contains material from the original resource package: Maria McLaughlin and Colm Regan (Eds.). Northern Ireland: A Place A Part? Exploring Conflict, Peace and Reconciliation in these Islands. 2000. This resource package was produced with the generous assistance of Development Cooperation Ireland. The Glencree Centre would also like to thank the International Fund for Ireland for their generous support of the Glencree Education Programme. The views expressed in this resource package are those of the Glencree Centre for Reconciliation and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of Development Cooperation Ireland or the International Fund for Ireland Development Publication Date: Cooperation Ireland November 2004 Foreword Foreword - Conor Lenihan T.D. It gives me great pleasure to write this foreword for this “Peace Education Resource Package” produced by the Glencree Centre for Reconciliation with the support of Development Cooperation Ireland (DCI). The DCI programme has as its priority, the reduction of poverty, inequality and exclusion in developing countries.Through its humanitarian programme, it provides emergency relief to the victims of conflict throughout the world.To those countries emerging from conflict and attempting to build stable and peaceful democracies, DCI provides support for rehabilitation and reconstruction, the development of democratic processes and the protection of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with the Legacy of Conflict in Northern Ireland Through Engagement and Dialogue
    Glencree Journal 2021 Dealing with the Legacy of Conflict in Northern Ireland through Engagement and Dialogue Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation in association with Irish Centre for Human Rights at NUI Galway and Ulster University. ISBN: 978–1-903727–05–8 March 2021 © 2021 – Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation The Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation Glencree, Co. Wicklow, A98 D635 Republic of Ireland The views and opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission or the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB). The views and opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation. Reproduction of all or part of this document may be authorised only with written consent of the source. A project supported by the European Union’s PEACE IV Programme, managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB). The Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation is a company limited by guarantee in the Republic of Ireland. Company No. 50088. Registered Charity No. CHY5943. Charities Regulatory Authority (CRA) No. 20009823. The Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation Established in 1974 in response to the conflict in Northern Ireland, the Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation works with individuals and groups to transform conflict, promote reconciliation, encourage healthy relationships and build sustainable peace. Under the Patronage of the President of Ireland, Michael D Higgins. e: [email protected] t: + 353 1 2829711 Connect with us www.glencree.ie Acknowledgments This Journal project was made possible by the European Union’s Peace IV Programme Body, (SEUPB), without whose support the publication of this Journal would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution – the Irish Experience
    The Role of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution – The Irish Experience Roundtable Meeting, Dublin, Ireland 9th – 11th April 2014 The Role of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution – The Irish Experience The Role of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution – The Irish Experience Roundtable Meeting, Dublin, Ireland 9th – 11th April 2014 April 2014 3 Published by Democratic Progress Institute 11 Guilford Street London WC1N 1DH United Kingdom www.democraticprogress.org [email protected] +44 (0)203 206 9939 First published, 2014 ISBN: 978-1-905592-93-7 © DPI – Democratic Progress Institute, 2014 DPI – Democratic Progress Institute is a charity registered in England and Wales. Registered Charity No. 1037236. Registered Company No. 2922108. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable.be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable 4 The Role of Civil Society in Conflict Resolution – The Irish Experience Contents Foreword ....................................................................................6 Group Photo ..............................................................................8 Welcome address ........................................................................9 Roundtable meeting on ‘A History of the Irish Conflict’ ...........13 Dinner at the Residence of Turkey Ambassador to Ireland
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Deep-Rooted Conflict: Guidelines Harvested from the Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation, Republic of Ireland
    Addressing Deep-Rooted Conflict: Guidelines Harvested from the Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation, Republic of Ireland by Megan Jeanne Jerke B.A., University of Lethbridge 2003 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION In the Department of Human and Social Development/School of Public Administration © Megan Jeanne Jerke, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ISBN:978-0-494-47351-1 ii Addressing Deep-Rooted Conflict: Guidelines Harvested from the Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation, Republic of Ireland by Megan Jeanne Jerke B.A., University of Lethbridge 2003 Supervisory Committee Prof. Maureen Maloney, Co-Supervisor and Departmental Member Director, Institute for Dispute Resolution Eamon Rafter, Co-Supervisor Associate Member, Faculty of Graduate Studies Dr. Lyn Davis Senior Instructor, Studies in Policy and Practice Program iii Supervisory Committee Prof. Maureen Maloney, Co-Supervisor and Departmental Member Director, Dispute Resolution Eamon Rafter, Co-Supervisor Associate Member, Faculty of Graduate Studies Dr. Lyn Davis Senior Instructor, Studies in Policy and Practice Program ABSTRACT This exploratory qualitative case study provides a description of the Glencree Centre for Peace and Reconciliation’s practice in addressing deep-rooted conflict, from the Republic of Ireland. This research grew out of practical problems from the field of conflict resolution in Canada, in particular interest-based mediation, in addressing deep-rooted conflict. Using an extended epistemology, data is harvested from praxis to create naturalistic generalizations: guidelines for addressing deep-rooted conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 - Heritage
    Wicklow County Development Plan 2016‐2022 CHAPTER 10 - HERITAGE 10.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to set out strategies and objectives with regard to the heritage of the County. The chapter is divided into the two main areas of built heritage and natural heritage (including landscape). The maps and schedules associated with this chapter are presented at the end of the chapter. 10.2 Built Heritage The built heritage of Wicklow refers to all man-made features, buildings or structures in the environment. This includes a rich and varied archaeological and architectural heritage to be found throughout the countryside and within the historic towns and villages of the county. Archaeological sites, features and objects both above and below ground, or underwater are evidence of human settlement from our earliest ancestors down to more recent centuries and provide information on how people in the area lived, worked and died. The architectural heritage relates to visible structures or buildings above ground of special value locally, regionally, nationally or even internationally. It covers many different building types, such as domestic houses, churches and shop premises but also includes other built elements such as bridges, piers, roads, engine houses, railways, holy wells, boundary walls to large estates, millraces, sluices and street furniture. The architectural and archaeological heritage of a town, village or place contributes greatly to the distinctive character of each local area. The Council is committed to safeguarding this heritage so that future generations may also enjoy this inheritance. This can be achieved by sensitively managing changes that occur to this heritage and by ensuring that significant elements, features or sites are retained.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs Trade and Defence on Behalf of Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation
    __________________________________________________________________________________ Submission to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs Trade and Defence on behalf of Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation ______________________________________________________________________________ We are very grateful to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs, Trade and Defence for meeting with us today www.glencree.ie BACKGROUND For almost 50 years, the Glencree Centre for Peace & Reconciliation has worked tirelessly behind the scenes, facilitating difficult conversations and building improbable relationships across divides. We played an integral role not only in the Irish peace process, but also in using what we have learned from the Irish experience to support peacebuilding efforts in other conflict and post-conflicts societies (e.g. Israel / Palestine, Afghanistan, Haiti, etc.). Over the years the scope of our work has evolved and continues to play a vital role. With the looming threat of Brexit and the political impasse in Stormont, we continue to facilitate meetings with political leaders in the north at the request of the Irish government; engage with political, religious and community leaders, paramilitary groups, victims and survivors of the Troubles; and partner with individuals and groups working in peacebuilding in the north. At the same time, in recognition of how modern Ireland is changing, we have broadened our reach to include intercultural and refugee integration. Internationally, we continue to share the lessons from the peace process; promote dialogue in Haiti and Papua New Guinea; and expand our peace education to schools and universities. GLENCREE AND THE 'GLOBAL IRELAND STRATEGY' The Global Ireland strategy, launched in 2018, recognises the need to increase Ireland’s influence and footprint in a globalised world in the areas of diplomacy, peace, tourism, culture, business, overseas aid and trade, through greater investment and by leveraging relationships with a scattered but influential diaspora.
    [Show full text]