Bridge Design Services
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Review on Applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 05 | May-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Review on applicability of Box Girder for Balanced Cantilever Bridge Sneha Redkar1, Prof. P. J. Salunke2 1Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India 2Head, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MGMCET, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - This paper gives a brief introduction to the 1874. Use of steel led to the development of cantilever cantilever bridges and its evolution. Further in cantilever bridges. The world’s longest span cantilever bridge was built bridges it focuses on system and construction of balanced in 1917 at Quebec over St. Lawrence River with main span of cantilever bridges. The superstructure forms the dynamic 549 m. India can boast of one such long bridge, the Howrah element as a load carrying capacity. As box girders are widely bridge, over river Hooghly with main span of 457 m which is used in forming the superstructure of balanced cantilever fourth largest of its kind. bridges, its advantages are discussed and a detailed review is carried out. Concrete cantilever construction was first introduced in Europe in early 1950’s and it has since been broadly used in design and construction of several bridges. Unlike various Key Words: Bridge, Balanced Cantilever, Superstructure, bridges built in Germany using cast-in-situ method, Box Girder, Pre-stressing cantilever construction in France took a different direction, emphasizing the use of precast segments. The various advantages of precast segments over cast-in-situ are: 1. INTRODUCTION i. Precast segment construction method is a faster method compared to cast-in-situ construction method. -
Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones
Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones Dr. Matthias Schueller, P.Eng. Vice President Parsons Structures Session 2020 TAC Conference & Exhibition Abstract Extradosed bridges are often described as a cross of a conventional prestressed concrete girder bridge and a traditional cable-stayed bridge because most extradosed bridges built combine a prestressed concrete superstructure with stay-cable technologies. However, this simple definition does not capture the various possible structural systems and different materials that can be found and used for extradosed bridges. Extradosed bridge technology is much more than a prestressed concrete girder with external tendons. The Deh Cho Bridge in the Northwest Territories and the Canal Lachine Bridge in Montréal are two Canadian extradosed bridges featuring steel superstructures with slender composite concrete decks using full-depth precast panels. Although both bridges are very different, they share one important design aspect which governed the design of their superstructures: Both bridges are located in regions with prolonged extreme cold winter periods. Temperatures below 0 °C and cold weather periods lasting up to five months can be a major hindrance when erecting long bridges with conventional concrete superstructures. On the contrary, steel superstructures are light and can be quickly erected, even at cold temperatures without heating and hording given that field welding is avoided. To avoid delays along the critical path in the erection of major superstructures in extreme cold temperature zones, designers should consider erection schemes which make best use of short warm weather periods and reduce negative impacts related to harsh weather conditions as best as possible. -
Bridges Key Stage 2 Thematic Unit
Bridges Key Stage 2 Thematic Unit Supporting the Areas of Learning and STEM Contents Section 1 Activity 1 Planning Together 3 Do We Need Activity 2 Do We Really Need Bridges? 4 Bridges? Activity 3 Bridges in the Locality 6 Activity 4 Decision Making: Cantilever City 8 Section 2 Activity 5 Bridge Fact-File 13 Let’s Investigate Activity 6 Classifying Bridges 14 Bridges! Activity 7 Forces: Tension and Compression 16 Activity 8 How Can Shapes Make a Bridge Strong? 18 Section 3 Activity 9 Construction Time! 23 Working with Activity 10 Who Builds Bridges? 25 Bridges Activity 11 Gustave Eiffel: A Famous Engineer 26 Activity 12 Building a Bridge and Thinking Like an Engineer 28 Resources 33 Suggested Additional Resources 60 This Thematic Unit is for teachers of Key Stage 2 children. Schools can decide which year group will use this unit and it should be presented in a manner relevant to the age, ability and interests of the pupils. This Thematic Units sets out a range of teaching and learning activities to support teachers in delivering the objectives of the Northern Ireland Curriculum. It also supports the STEM initiative. Acknowledgement CCEA would like to thank The Institution of Civil Engineers Northern Ireland (ICE NI) for their advice and guidance in the writing of this book. Cover image © Thinkstock Do We Need Bridges? Planning together for the theme. Discovering the reasons for having, and the impact of not having, bridges. Writing a newspaper report about the impact of a missing bridge. Researching bridges in the locality. Grouping and classifying bridges. -
Roads & Bridges November 2012
BRIDGE DESIGN By Jamie Farris, P.E., Dan Carlson, P.E., and Eric Nelson, P.E. Contributing Authors Proper frame work Waco, TxDOT come up with right solution for IH-35 ruce Jackson, a noted professor of inspirational, in many ways bridges define their surroundings. Needing to expand I-35 American culture, said, “Bridges (IH-35), representatives from the city of Waco B are perhaps the most invisible form wanted signature bridges with an “art deco” look to complement other recent downtown of public architecture; they become frames economic revitalization projects. Because for looking at the world around us.” the frontage road bridges were going to be constructed first—the mainline bridges will be Taking that philosophy out of academia and replaced later—TxDOT and Waco representa- putting it into practice, the Waco District of the tives decided to create signature twin frontage Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) road bridges on each side of the mainline has initiated a unique bridge project spanning bridges. Though aesthetics was certainly a the Brazos River. Though only two frontage driving force behind the new bridge design, the road bridges are involved, the $17.3 million initial defining characteristic of the project was IH-35 Extradosed Bridge Project will pioneer a functional need. bridge technique in the U.S. As part of the American infrastructure, Brazos bravado bridges often become treasured landmarks IH-35 runs north-south through the heart in their communities. Majestic, grand and of Texas. A major transportation artery for the 42 November 2012 • ROADS&BRIDGES Debate rages over the boundary some 60 ft from the corresponding between extradosed and traditional mainline bridges. -
Construction & Design Services
CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN SERVICES UTTAR PRADESH JAL MGAIVI (A Govt. of U.P.Undertaking) Head Office: TC-38V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010 HG Ph.: +915222728985 Fax: +91 5222728988 Vlsll us: www. cd su pj n. org e -m ai I : di rector@cd s u pjn. o rg Ref. 2, ..2[.-.8-( I l6f pate./..?. Construction of a Dedicated corridor (4 Lane including Extradosed Bridge across river Ganga) for old, differently abled persons during Kumbh and Magh Mela at Sangam, Allahabad (U.P.) India Replies/Clarifications to the Oueries raised on RFO cum RFP & Bid Documents by various firms in Pre-Bid Meetine flD on dated 25.06.2016 Regarding NIT No. 496|CGM-U Dedi.Coni.All.116 dated 06.04.2016 and subsequent corrigendum issued vide letter no. 556/CGM-IiDedi.Corri.All./16 dated 05.05.2016, a Pre-Bid Meeting (II) was held at Head Quarter of C&DS, UP Jal Nigam, Lucknow on dated 25.06.2016. Some of the firms participating in meeting raised some queries in person as well as through correspondence (electronic or otherwise) regarding the pre-qualification criteria mentioned in RFQ cum RFQ document and draft EPC Agreement. The Bid clarifications and amendments in RFQ cum RFP document and draft EPC agreement are attached herewith. Enclosure: As above. I (A K Rai) Chief General Manager (I) Copy to the following for information and necessarv action nlease:- l. Managing Director, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow with enclosures. 2. Director, C&DS, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow. J. General Manager (Ganga Bridge), C&DS, U.P. -
Over Jones Falls. This Bridge Was Originally No
The same eastbound movement from Rockland crosses Bridge 1.19 (miles west of Hollins) over Jones Falls. This bridge was originally no. 1 on the Green Spring Branch in the Northern Central numbering scheme. PHOTO BY MARTIN K VAN HORN, MARCH 1961 /COLLECTION OF ROBERT L. WILLIAMS. On October 21, 1959, the Interstate Commerce maximum extent. William Gill, later involved in the Commission gave notice in its Finance Docket No. streetcar museum at Lake Roland, worked on the 20678 that the Green Spring track west of Rockland scrapping of the upper branch and said his boss kept would be abandoned on December 18, 1959. This did saying; "Where's all the steel?" Another Baltimore not really affect any operations on the Green Spring railfan, Mark Topper, worked for Phillips on the Branch. Infrequently, a locomotive and a boxcar would removal of the bridge over Park Heights Avenue as a continue to make the trip from Hollins to the Rockland teenager for a summer job. By the autumn of 1960, Team Track and return. the track through the valley was just a sad but fond No train was dispatched to pull the rail from the memory. Green Spring Valley. The steel was sold in place to the The operation between Hollins and Rockland con- scrapper, the Phillips Construction Company of tinued for another 11/2 years and then just faded away. Timonium, and their crews worked from trucks on ad- So far as is known, no formal abandonment procedure jacent roads. Apparently, Phillips based their bid for was carried out, and no permission to abandon was the job on old charts that showed the trackage at its ' obtained. -
Polydron-Bridges-Work-Cards.Pdf
Getting Started You will need: A Polydron Bridges Set ❑ This activity introduces you to the parts in the set and explains what each of them does. A variety of traditional Polydron and Frameworks pieces are used in each of the activities. However, they are coloured to produce more realistic effects. For example, the traditional squares are black and used to represent the road on the bridge deck. Plinth ❑ On the right you can see the plinth or bridge base. All of the bridges use one or two of these. They give each bridge a firm base and allow special parts to be connected easily. Notice the two holes in the top on the plinth. These holes are for long struts. These can be seen in place below. ❑ The second picture shows the plinth with two right-angled triangles and a rectangle connected. All three of these parts clip into the plinth. Struts ❑ There are three different lengths of strut in the set. There are 80mm short struts that are used with the pulleys with lugs to carry cables. These are shown on the left. The lugs fit into long struts. On the Drawbridge 110mm short struts are used with ordinary pulleys and a winding handle. ❑ Long struts are also used to support the cable assembly of the Suspension Bridge and the Cable Stay Bridge. This idea can be seen in the picture on the right. ❑ Long struts are also used to connect the two sections of the Drawbridge. ® ©Bob Ansell Special Rectangles ❑ Special rectangles can be used in a variety of ways. -
Cantilever Bridges: the Governor Harry W
CANTILEVER BRIDGES: THE GOVERNOR HARRY W. NICE MEMORIAL BRIDGE From a technical perspective, cantilever construction of a bridge defines a specific form of support of the bridge rather than a particular bridge type such as the truss or girder. Simply supported bridges are directly supported on piers and abutments, while continuous structures, as developed in both metal and reinforced concrete during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, include spans that are continuous across one or more intermediate supports. By contrast, the cantilever form of support occurs when the support is at one end and the other end of the span is free. Cantilever bridges consist of a series of cantilevered spans including a main span and two anchor spans which flank it (Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation 1986:124). Based on historical research alone, cantilever bridges in Maryland appear to be represented by only one bridge, which may be briefly described in order to provide historic technological context for the evaluation of that bridge, the 1940 Governor Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge carrying U.S. 301 over the Potomac River. Bridge historian J.A.L. Waddell noted that "the development of the cantilever. did not proceed very far until modern times, when the truss form of structure had become established and when iron and steel constituted the materials of construction" (Waddell 1916:7). Waddell and subsequent technological historians dated the major advent of modern cantilever bridges to the design and construction of the high bridge over the Kentucky River at Dixville in 1876-1877. -
Cable-Stayed Bridge from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Cable-Stayed Bridge
Cable-stayed bridge From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Cable-stayed bridge The Rio-Antirrio bridge in Greece Ancestor Suspension bridge Related None Side-spar cable-stayed bridge, Self- Descendant anchored suspension bridge, cantilever spar cable-stayed bridge Pedestrians, bicycles, automobiles, Carries trucks, light rail Span range Medium Steel rope, post-tensioned concrete Material box girders, steel or concrete pylons Movable No Design effort medium Falsework Normally none required A cable-stayed bridge is a bridge that consists of one or more columns (normally referred to as towers or pylons), with cables supporting the bridge deck. There are two major classes of cable-stayed bridges: In a harp design, the cables are made nearly parallel by attaching them to various points on the tower(s) so that the height of attachment of each cable on the tower is similar to the distance from the tower along the roadway to its lower attachment. In a fan design, the cables all connect to or pass over the top of the tower(s). Compared to other bridge types, the cable-stayed is optimal for spans longer than typically seen in cantilever bridges, and shorter than those typically requiring a suspension bridge. This is the range in which cantilever spans would rapidly grow heavier if they were lengthened, and in which suspension cabling does not get more economical, were the span to be shortened. History of development Cable-stayed bridge by the Renaissance polymath Fausto Veranzio, from 1595/1616 Cable-stayed bridges can be dated back to 1595, where designs were found in a book by the Venetian inventor Fausto Veranzio, called Machinae Novae. -
6 VI June 2018
6 VI June 2018 http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.6289 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887 Volume 6 Issue VI, June 2018- Available at www.ijraset.com Characteristic Study on Cable-Stayed and Extradosed Bridge Rohini R. Kavathekar1, Dr. N.K.Patil2 1Student of P.G., M.E. Civil,-Structure Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India 2 Professor & Head , Civil Engg. Department, Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India Abstract: This paper presents study of cable-stayed bridge and extradosed bridge. For analysis 100m, 150m, 200m, 250m and 300m spans are considered. Extradosed bridge is a novel idea bridge between Girder Bridge and cable-stayed bridge. This paper is concluded with study of various parameters of these types of bridges. The parametric study includes response of deck, deck moment, study of pylon, how the response of bridge varies span wise, from aesthetics point of view feasible bridge structure, pylon height and span length to thickness of girder ratio. The parameters of extradosed bridge are compared with cable-stayed bridge. Keywords: CSI Bridge, cable-stayed bridge, extradosed bridge, bending moment, shear force, pylon height, girder depth, aesthetic view. I. INTRODUCTION During XIX century, one of the most relevant contributions to bridge engineering has been the introduction of prestressed technique, which is a solution to the need of controlling stress on elements in bridges. Initially this technique was employed by means of internal and external prestressed tendons, until 1925 when modern cable-stayed bridges appeared –the Tempul Aqueduct, which was developed and built by Eduardo Torroja (Torroja, 1927). -
Bridge Engineering Handbook Superstructure Design Segmental
This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 02 Oct 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: CRC Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK Bridge Engineering Handbook Superstructure Design Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan Segmental Concrete Bridges Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b16523-4 Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan Published online on: 24 Jan 2014 How to cite :- Wai-Fah Chen, Lian Duan. 24 Jan 2014, Segmental Concrete Bridges from: Bridge Engineering Handbook, Superstructure Design CRC Press Accessed on: 02 Oct 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.1201/b16523-4 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. 3 Segmental Concrete Bridges 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................91 -
Identifying and Preserving Historic Bridges
Appendix B—State Departments of Transportation Alabama Department of Transportation Florida Department of Transportation 1409 Coliseum Boulevard 605 Suwannee Street Montgomery, AL 36130 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 (334) 242-6311 (850) 488-8541 (334) 262-8041 (fax) (850) 277-3403 (fax) Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Georgia Department of Transportation 3132 Channel Drive 2 Capital Square Juneau, AK 99801-7898 Atlanta, GA 30334 (907) 465-3900 (404) 656-5206 (907) 586-8365 (fax) (404) 657-8389 (fax) Internet address: [email protected] Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Hawaii Department of Transportation Phoenix, AZ 85007 869 Punchbowl Street (602) 255-7011 Honolulu, HI 96813-5097 (602) 256-7659 (fax) (808) 587-2150 (808) 587-2167 (fax) Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department State Highway Department Building Idaho Transportation Department P.O. Box 2261, 10324 Interstate 30 3311 W. State Street Little Rock, AR 72203 P.O. Box 7129 (501) 569-2000 Boise, ID 83707 (501) 569-2400 (fax) (208) 334-8000 (208) 334-3858 (fax) California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street Illinois Department of Transportation P.O. Box 942673 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 Springfield, IL 62764 (916) 654-5266 (217) 782-5597 (217) 782-6828 (fax) Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Indiana Department of Transportation Denver, CO 80222 Indiana Government Center North (303) 757-9201 100 North Senate Avenue (303) 757-9149 (fax) Indianapolis, IN 46204-2249 (317) 232-5533 Connecticut Department of Transportation (317) 232-0238 (fax) P.O. Box 317546 / 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06131-7546 Iowa Department of Transportation (860) 594-3000 800 Lincoln Way Ames, IA 50010 Delaware Department of Transportation (515) 239-1101 Bay Road, Route 113, P.O.