DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Metropolitan Mobility: Strategies for the Bi-State Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Metropolitan Mobility: Strategies for the Bi-State Region ISSN 1052-7524 Proceedings of the Transportation Research Forum Volume 7 1993 35th TRF Annual Forum New York, New York October 14-16, 1993 4 Proceedings of TRF, Vol. 7, 1993 vi Keynote Address it Improving Metropolitan Mobility: Strategies for the Bi-state Region Keynote Speaker: Stanley Brezenoff Port Authority of New York and New Jersey a The Transportation Research Forum was our services more flexible and more founded here in New York City 35 years reliable in all aspects. ago, and it is fitting that this year's meeting be held here because, whAever I will provide a quick tour of the major your professional specialty, it is in work underway and sketch the vision motion somewhere in the metropolitan that is emerging of a unified regional area, and a local TRF member is likely network for moving people and goods. to be in the middle of the action. Dozens of initiatives are underway. There is a lot going on in transportation Taken together, they promise steady that translates directly into issues, progress toward a system that offers problems, and concerns that are wider transportation choices, more fundamental to this region, to this competitive gateways to world trade, country, and to this society. easier access to economic opportunity, and reduced air pollution without For example, double-stack rail service, reduced mobility. high speed ferries, new airport transit links, electronic toll and fare collections, If you are working in this region now, "smart highway" systems, new rail you are already part of this new wave of transit links, and improved intermodal investment and service improvement. rail transfers, are all happening here and they all stand to make a difference If you are with a company that serves in the lives of the people who live here. national transportation markets, you should look to the new opportunities This region, America's busiest gateway opening up here for public and private and biggest marketplace, is mobilizing partnerships to move people and goods itself to take full advantage of the within the region and through our changes sweeping transportation in gateway facilities. America. Obviously, the new national directions We are applying intermodal thinking, embodied in ISTEA and other new new technologies, and increased federal federal laws have opened the way for funding across the region. strategic public works investment that can sharpen the competitiveness of The Port Authority and our sister mature regions like ours. agencies in both states are working together to build more capacity into the These policy reforms coincide with a set regional network. We intend to make of emerging technologies and new ser- Keynote Address vice concepts that offer us new tools for new transportation investment by improving regional transportation. We providing taxes, tolls, and other may not have been the first to adopt resources when needed. Both states most ofthese recent innovations,but you have promoted projects and planning Will never find so many of them in one that move the region toward a more Place as you will here through the 90's seamless network. and beyond. Obviously, I won't pretend that New The Port Authority is extending itself as York and New Jersey don't sometimes never before in our 72-year history, with compete with each other. If you listened a broadened capital program, and with to the news this morning, you noted that service-oriented changes in our 900 jobs are moving to Jersey City from ore operations. We want to ensure that the their current place in Manhattan, and region takes every opportunity presented the news received a lot of attention. But by these changes through the decade. that internal regional competition has tjor Frankly, we know ISTEA is a limited- sharpened the region's determination to ion time offer coming out of Washington. support economic growth, and it hasn't aal impeded progress on strategic 3. Our regions' port operations feel the transportation investment benefitting Presence of competition from other both states. v. global and domestic business centers. dy We also value the federal government's rs With thousands of business customers recent support for the critical role played re and tenants using our crossings, by transportation systems in metropoli- le, terminals, and commercial spaces, we tan life and national competitiveness. know they need better service and tight International gateways in this and other ut cost control to survive their competitors. regions are national assets. We see a much improved policy framework for That is why we are reshaping the way melding federal, state, local, and private w, we do our business to be more responsive sector investments to support national of in providing transportation, developing goals. Partnerships, and planning for the future. Our agency is a unique public In this climate, the Port Authority has enterprise. It is self-supporting, spans been able to advance its ambitious two dynamic states, and is home to airport redevelopment programs, port )s more, and different, public and private improvements, and vital interstate ,e Partnerships than any other area. transportation investments. Both state ls transportation departments have ir The region has to have its transportation strengthened their planning and act together to keep the jobs and network management efforts. business activities it has now and to capture new economic growth. We are New Jersey Transit and the New York in a race with competing regions to Metropolitan Transportation Authority upgrade and inter-connect the in-place have been improving transit systems transportation assets that many other that are the envy of every urban area cities are creating from the ground up. with a Clean Air Act problem. More than half of all transit rides in the The race isn't over by any means, but United States occur here. Today, the our pace is quickening. The region's Port Authority, and these two transit elected leadership has strongly supported agencies,serve a 17-county region that is 6 Proceedings of TRF, Vol. 7, 1993 home to 18 million people and 8 million TransitCenter, a marketing alliance of f. jobs. More than 700 million tons of the MTA, NJT and PATH. The freight are moved within the region each TransitCenter is signing up more year. businesses for TransitCheks. TransitCheks are vouchers that Each weekday, all these commuters and employers can give workers to help pay cargo containers go into motion together. transit fares on every public and private They share an overlapping network of transit system in the region. highways and rail lines overburdened on many critical routes and managed by Our airport mobility is being upgraded. hosts of operators. These projects include major terminal and frontage improvements at What is changing now is that the LaGuardia, new roadway systems at region's major transportation players are JFK, and a people mover linking 1 forming a series of working partnerships terminals and parking at Newark to improve the regional network. We International Airport. are moving on three broad fronts and I'll sketch the array of efforts that are now These projects, plus air cargo improve- underway. ments, and other work, reflect $1.3 billion spent by the Port Authority since First, we want smoother connections and 1988, with nearly $2.0 billion more improved services. Every toll crossing programmed through 1997. Airlines and and highway in the region should be other businesses are investing nearly as part of a common electronic toll much equity at the airports at the same collections system within the next few time. years, allowing truckers and others to maintain a single payment account and The second of our three broad fronts save time on the road too. includes many major new services that are in the works. The MTA is beginning implementation of electronic fare card systems on the Transit access to all three regional subway, the heart of the region's rail airports is on the front burner. transit network. Subway fare cards open the way for major expansion of the Plans for linking each airport to the region's existing joint ticketing and regional rail system are going into transit marketing efforts. PATH (The environmental impact study reviews this Port Authority Trans-Hudson commuter fall. We estimate that Kennedy and railroad) Quick Card is already offered LaGuardia links could eliminate as with New Jersey Transit Commuter Rail many as 500,000 miles of roadway travel monthly tickets. daily. More reliable traffic flow for the region's High speed ferries and other waterborne busy highways is happening through links are augmenting the regional TRANSCOM, a 15-agency tri-state transportation system. Governor Cuomo group. TRANSCOM links operations last month announced plans for several centers for major vehicular and transit new routes linking Manhattan with facilities. It is a point of coordination as three boroughs and Westchester County. we put in place IVHS systems and Light rail transit is coming to New motorist advisory services. Employer Jersey's redeveloping Hudson support of transit is growing through the waterfront, and may be across 42nd Keynote Address of Street here in Manhattan. NJT is the Goethels Bridge linking the region he moving forward with expanded via Union County and Staten Island. Dre corarauter rail connections linking ES. services within New Jersey and bringing Second, we are planning with other iat more trains into Penn Station in New agencies to take a very serious look at lay York. creating a major new rail connection for te transit and freight across the core of the The third of our three broad fronts, and, region. Perhaps most important, we are ed. strengthening intermodal freight links. Accomplishment of all or even most of 121 On-dock rail service and double-stack these projects is obviously not guaran- at access is available at our Port Newark- teed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potential Options Table
    POTENTIAL OPTIONS CODE WORKING GROUPS TOS TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY GM GOODS MOVEMENT TS TRANSIT SERVICES BP BIKE/PEDESTRIAN ENV ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT # CODE NO. DESCRIPTION (**) 1 TOS-1 Encourage employers to offer flexible schedules so traffic is not always congested at the same times. 2 TOS-2 Improve signage along Cross Bronx Expressway. 3 TOS-3 Establish breakdown lane and shoulders on major roadways. 4 TOS-4 Examine local and mainline bridges to facilitate traffic flow. 5 TOS-5 Eliminate TDM measures to divert traffic to alternate routes-this hurts local communities. 6 TOS-6 Create an exit on Cross Bronx Expressway near the Sheridan Expressway (near Boston Road) in the area of the former industrial park (174 – 176th Streets) which will become a 136,00 square ft. retail center. 7 TOS-7 Improve road conditions in the Bronx. 8 TOS-8 The intersection of Devoe Avenue and 177th Street should be examined so that its congestion problem can be improved. 9 TOS-9 Improve operational/geometric conditions along parallel major arterials in Major Deegan Expressway corridor (e.g., University Avenue and Grand Concourse). 10 TOS-10 Construct service roads/c-d roads on Major Deegan Expressway. Options are continuous, partial and directional (nb/sb) service/c-d roads. 11 TOS-11 Improve mainline horizontal geometry on Major Deegan Expressway, south of 145th Street. 12 TOS-12 Examine option to divert Cross Bronx Expressway-Henry Hudson Parkway traffic to Washington Bridge as alternative route to the Alexander Hamilton Bridge. Option to increase outer lane usage and to reduce congestion on inner lanes on Trans- Manhattan Expressway.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSDOT "Rail Program-Report 1985"
    ~.. ~~\ . , t····_, & NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT ·1985 . Prepared by the Rail Division November 1985 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARIO M. CUOMO, Governor FRANKLIN E. WHITE, Commissioner NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT 1985 Prepared in compliance with the rules and regulations for the: State Rail Pian, per Section 5 (j) of the Department of Transportation Act; and Annual Report to the State legislature, per Chapter 257, Section 8, of the Laws of 1975 and Chapter 369, Section 2 of the laws of 1979. TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE INTRODUCTION iv CHAPTER 1: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL PROGRAM 1 A. PROGRAM ELEMENTS 1 B. ACHIEVEMENTS 3 CHAPTER 2: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL POLICY 6 A. AUTHORITY 6 B. POLICY 6 C. PLANNING PROCESS 9 CHAPTER 3: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM 12 A. NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL FREIGHT SYSTEM 12 B. INTERCITY RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE 13 CHAPTER 4: RAIL ISSUES 18 CHAPTER 5: PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 29 A. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS 29 B. CURRENT PROGRAM OF RAIL PROJECTS 30 C. PROJECTS UNDER REVIEW FOR FUTURE FUNDING 33 MAP 1 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL/HIGm~AY SYSTEM M.l MAP 2 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM M.2 APPENDIX I - PROJECTS COMPLETED UNDER NEW YORK STATE'S Al.1 RAIL PROGRAM A. 1974 BOND ISSUE Al.1 B. 1979 BOND ISSUE A1.3 C. FEDERAL LOCAL RAIL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM A1.4 D. STATE RAILASSISTANCE PROGRAM Al.5 E. RAILROAD BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Al.6 APPENDIX II - RAIL ABANDONMENTS A2.1 A. RAIL LINES ABANDONED DURING 1983-84 WITH NO A2.1 CONTINUATION OF SERVICE B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structuring of Rail Concessions
    RAIL FREIGHT IN NEW YORK CITY: A Global View Transportation Research Forum New York City 6 May 2002 Henry Posner III, Chairman Railroad Development Corporation I am truly honored to be here today as I know so many of you in the audience. I would like to give you my personal opinions about New York, which are also the official positions of Railroad Development Corporation (RDC). The agenda today is therefore to provide some background on RDC; the U.S. short line industry; the overseas rail privatization industry; case studies concerning overseas railways and New York City; and to draw some conclusions. Let me first apologize for the extremely pretentious title of this presentation. I really tried to think up something that would be less pretentious. The idea is not to pompously shove any out-of-town opinions down anyone’s throat; but rather to raise people’s consciousness as to how rail freight in New York stacks up against the world on the other side of the Hudson River and also the world on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean. Background on RDC RDC is a small company and one could say that we are probably among the least successful of the short line companies, at least in the USA. We are a privately held company and, while we have not been particularly successful in the USA, we have found a niche for ourselves in what we describe as Emerging Corridors in Emerging Markets – rail privatizations with related businesses like ports, etc. in smaller countries, and in particular developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Line Railroad Corridor Transportation Plan (2005)
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Canadian Pacific Railway CSX Transportation MTA Metro-North Railroad New York State Department of Transportation Hudson Line Railroad Corridor Transportation Plan Final Report (Document No. M40801-11/9518/STU-137) November 2005 Prepared by: In association with: ZETA-TECH Associates, Inc. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 2. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE HUDSON LINE SCENARIOS ...................2 2.1. Development and Calibration of the Simulation Model (2002 Baseline)......... 2 2.1.1. 2002 Baseline Inputs ....................................................................................................... 2 2.1.2. 2002 Baseline Simulation Results ................................................................................. 6 2.2. Future Year (2022) Baseline ........................................................................................ 7 2.2.1. 2022 Baseline Inputs ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2. 2022 Baseline Simulation Results ................................................................................. 8 2.3. Future Year (2022) Alternatives................................................................................10 2.3.1. 2022 Scenario 1 Inputs..................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Mobility
    Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION THE EAST OF HUDSON RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONS TASK FORCE Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION Environmental Defense and the East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force On the cover Left:Trucks exacerbate crippling congestion on the Cross-Bronx Expressway (photo by Adam Gitlin). Top right: A CSX Q116-23 intermodal train hauls double-stack containers in western New York. (photo by J. Henry Priebe Jr.). Bottom right: A New York Cross Harbor Railroad “piggypacker” transfers a low-profile container from rail to a trailer (photo by Adam Gitlin). Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. The East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force is committed to the restoration of price- and service-competitive freight rail service in the areas of the New York metropolitan region east of the Hudson River. The Task Force seeks to accomplish this objective through bringing together elected officials, carriers and public agencies at regularly scheduled meetings where any issue that hinders or can assist in the restoration of competitive rail service is discussed openly. It is expected that all participants will work toward the common goal of restoring competitive rail freight service East of the Hudson. ©2004 Environmental Defense Printed on 100% (50% post-consumer) recycled paper, 100% chlorine free.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7338-252 / I-95 Nerops Tech Memo 1
    I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps) Phase I Final Report July 2007 Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps) Phase I Final Report Prepared for: I-95 Corridor Coalition Sponsored by: I-95 Corridor Coalition New York State Department of Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Rhode Island Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation Vermont Agency of Transportation New Hampshire Department of Transportation Maine Department of Transportation Prepared by: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Acknowledgements: Thanks to Steve Slavick of New York State Department of Transportation for leading the project Steering Committee, and to all those from the public and private sector who contributed to the report. A full list of participants can be found in the Appendices. July 2007 This report was produced by the I-95 Corridor Coalition, a partnership of state departments of transportation, regional and local transportation agencies, toll authorities, and related organizations, including law enforcement, port, transit and rail organizations, from Maine to Florida, with affiliate members in Canada. Additional information about the Coalition, including other project reports, can be found on the Coalition’s web site at http://www.i95coalition.org. Questions about the NEROps Phase I Final Report should be directed to: Marygrace Parker I-95 Corridor Coalition Freight, Mobility, Safety & Security Coordinator Northeast Rail Operations Study (NEROps) Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View of Harlem River Looking Fig
    Beile Yin, Ph.D., PE, F. ASCE 14Wcee 2008 05-02-0061 SEISMIC DESIGN OF TWO NEW YORK BRIDGES Beile Yin, Ph.D., PE, F. ASCE, Hardesty & Hanover, LLP, New York, USA ABSTRACT The Third Avenue Bridge and Willis Avenue Bridge are two adjacent bridges each carrying one directional traffic across Harlem River in New York City. The replacement of 100-year old Third Avenue Bridge is complete. The new 5-lane crossing consists of 17 approach spans and a 107-m long swing span for an overall bridge length of 457m. Including on-grade approaches, the overall project length is 1067m. Construction of the $118.8 million bridge replacement project began in 2001 and completed in 2005. The Willis Avenue Swing Bridge over the Harlem River is being replaced under a $612 million project which is massive in scope as it extends over a mile in length, passes over the Harlem River and an adjoining railyard and provides connections between two major highways as well as three major arterial streets. The new alignment not only dramatically improves the alignment from that of the 100 year old existing bridge but also facilitates maintaining 70,000 vehicles per day of roadway traffic as well as maintaining navigation on the river. The project centerpiece is a new four lane, 106 meter long swing span. This paper focuses on the seismic analysis and seismic design of the two bridges. Challenges faced by the designers of the new bridge, and solutions developed to meet these challenges will be introduced. Since similarities exist between these two bridges, more detailed description will be on one of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Areas of Specialization
    Theodore von Rosenvinge IV, P.E., D.GE Senior Principal EXPERIENCE GeoDesign, Inc. - 2/95 to Present Berger, Lehman Associates, P.C. - 5/92 to 1/95 GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. – Boston & CT 7/80 to 4/92 T.W. Lambe (MIT) 1979-80, other firms - 2 years 1975-78 co-op Composite Construction 1973-1975 EDUCATION AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION M.S., 1980, Civil Engineering (geotechnical specialization), MIT Geotechnical Engineering B.S., 1978, Civil Engineering, Northeastern University Constructibility/Peer Review M.B.A., 1993, University of Connecticut (Finance) Foundation Engineering Dispute Resolution Board Training, 2003 Soil Mechanics/Slopes Deep Foundations/Excavation PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer: NY, TN, NJ, CT, MA, ME, VT, NH, RI, MI, PA, TX, FL, MD, LEED AP PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Mr. von Rosenvinge began his career as a union construction worker in Boston before engineering school for structural engineering and an advanced degree in geotechnical engineering. Geotechnical engineering experience includes field engineer to principal in the responsible charge of hundreds of projects involving foundation engineering for hi-rise buildings, major bridges, rail facilities, marine projects, earthwork/underground construction, earth retention structures and slopes, computational analysis for soil structure interaction, slope stability, soil and rock mechanics, rock engineering, blasting/vibration analysis, forensic/expert witness, field and lab testing, geotechnical instrumentation. Founding GEODesign, Inc. in 1995 the
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Network and Infrastructure
    TECHNICAL MEMO NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update 2015-2040 Interim Plan Task 2.1.2 Rail Network and Infrastructure REVISED, JANUARY 2014 technical memorandum Task 2.1.2 Technical Memorandum Rail Network and Infrastructure Revised, January 30, 2014 Task 2.1.2 Technical Memorandum Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Institutional Structure ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Background .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Class I Carriers and Affiliates ................................................................... 2-4 CSX................................................................................................................ 2-4 Norfolk Southern (NS) ............................................................................... 2-6 Conrail Shared Assets ................................................................................ 2-9 Canadian Pacific (CP) ............................................................................... 2-10 2.3 Short Line and Regional Firms ............................................................... 2-10 Housatonic Railroad ................................................................................. 2-10 New York and Atlantic Railway ............................................................. 2-10 New York New Jersey Rail .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Viabilityofoakpoint
    State of New York Office of the State Comptroller Division of Management Audit NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STAFF STUDY: THE VIABILITY OF THE OAK POINT LINK AND HARLEM RIVER YARD PROJECTS REPORT 95-D-43 H. Carl McCall Comptroller State of New York Office of the State Comptroller Division of Management Audit Report 95-D-43 Mr. John B. Daly Commissioner NYS Department of Transportation State Office Building Campus - Building #5 Albany, New York 12232 Dear Mr. Daly: The following is our staff study of the viability of the Oak Point Link and the Harlem River Yard projects. We did this study according to the State Comptroller's authority as set forth in Section 1, Article V of the State Constitution and Section 8, Article 2 of the State Finance Law. We list major contributors to this report in Appendix A. February 5, 1997 In an effort to reduce the costs of printing, if you wish your name to be deleted from our mailing list or if your address has changed, contact Raymond W. Cecot at (518) 474-3271 or at the Office of the State Comptroller, Alfred E. Smith State Office Building, 13th Floor, Albany, NY 12236. Executive Summary New York State Department Of Transportation Staff Study: The Viability Of The Oak Point Link And Harlem River Yard Projects Scope of Study In the early 1970s, the New York State Department of Transportation (DOT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the City of New York identified a series of capital improvements (that included raising rail clearances) to improve the rail freight network in the downstate region of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • EMPLOYEE TIMETABLE Timetable No. 4 Effective February 5, 2006
    EMPLOYEE TIMETABLE Timetable No. 4 Effective February 5, 2006 FOR EMPLOYEES ONLY R. E. Lieblong Senior Vice President – Operations GO 413 (4-10) Employee Timetable INTRODUCTION The Employee Timetable contains four parts, plus Track Charts which are provided for information only. Line Special Instructions contain Line- and Branch-specific information and rules. Each section has a prefix identifying the Line or Branch, and is numbered as shown in the table below. Hudson Line Special Instructions are separated into two sections: • GCT 41 through GCT 48 apply only to the portion of the Hudson Line between GCT and the southerly limit of CP 8 (MP 6.9). • HUD 41 through HUD 48 apply only to the portion of the Hudson Line between the southerly limit of CP 8 (MP 6.9) and Division Post/CSX (MP 75.8), inclusive. Hudson Line New Haven Line New New CP8 CP8 to Branch Branch Branch Branch Canaan Canaan Divison Divison Division Division Danbury Danbury CP 112 to to 112 CP Post/CSX LineHarlem Beacon Line Line Beacon Waterbury Waterbury GCT to CP8 GCT to CP8 Subject Post/Amtrak STATIONS HUD 40 HAR-40 NHV 40 NCN 40 DAN 40 WBY 40 BEA 40 MAX AUTH SPEEDS GCT 41 HUD 41 HAR 41 NHV 41 NCN 41 DAN 41 WBY 41 BEA 41 EQUIP. RESTR. GCT 42 HUD 42 HAR 42 NHV 42 NCN 42 DAN 42 WBY 42 BEA 42 ELECTRICAL OPER. GCT 43 HUD 43 HAR 43 NHV 43 NCN 43 DAN 43 WBY 43 BEA 43 HIGHWAY GRADE GCT 44 HUD 44 HAR 44 NHV 44 NCN 44 DAN 44 WBY 44 BEA 44 CROSSINGS LOCATION OF BULL.
    [Show full text]