Why Hilara Is Not Amusing: the Problem of Open- Ended Taxa and the Limits of Taxonomic Knowledge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Hilara Is Not Amusing: the Problem of Open- Ended Taxa and the Limits of Taxonomic Knowledge CHAptER TEN WHY HILARA IS NOT AMUSING: THE PROBLEM OF OpEN- ENDED TaXA AND THE LIMITS OF TaXONOMIC KNOWLEDGE Daniel Bickel Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia INTRODUCT I ON Recent concern over biodiversity loss has highlighted our ignorance about life on this planet. In particular, we do not even know how many species exist, or how many there are likely to be. Somewhere between 1.5–1.8 mil- lion plant and animal species have been described (this number is un- certain partially due to potential synonymy), but estimates of the actual number10 of living species range from 5–100 million (Stork 1997). Such estimates are based on varying methods of calculation, different species concepts, and trophic models, but a figure close to 10 million species has been used in many recent papers. Various projects have been proposed to electronically document all species in a unified format, the most recent being the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL), which plans a separate web page for each described species on the planet (Leslie 2007). Other projects, such as the defunct All Species Foun- dation, called for ‘the discovery, identification, and description of all re- maining species on Earth within one human generation—25 years’ (Berg- er 2005). This unrealistically optimistic project, while acknowledging the small number of practicing taxonomists (6,000–7,000) and the rather low output of new species described each year (15,000), naively proposed that new tools and computer technology could overcome any problems. Previ- ously, E.O. Wilson (2000, 2003a) stated ‘to describe and classify all of the surviving species of the world deserves to be one of the great scientific goals of the new century.’ I do not question Wilson’s enthusiasm and his ground-breaking achievements in many areas of biology (including Wil- Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools (eds T. Pape, D. Bickel & R. Meier). © 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV. 280 D. Bickel son 2003b, his magisterial monograph treating the New World ant genus Pheidole with 624 species, 337 newly described, this alone being far more than the individual output of most full-time taxonomists), but I doubt we can come even close to describing the Earth’s biota, and reaching even 3 million described species in next century would itself be a major accom- plishment. To begin with, the 1.5–1.8 million described species (those to be award- ed individual EOL web pages), include all the larger, prominent species (vascular plants and vertebrates), a general baseline of taxa (butterflies, mollusks, ants, algae, etc.), taxa of direct economic or medical interest (agricultural pests, mosquitoes, etc.), and random groups studied out of personal curiosity (for example, the 10,890 species & subspecies in the cranefly family Tipulidae described by C.P. Alexander; see Oosterbroek 2007). The remaining 5-100 million undescribed taxa comprise mostly invertebrates, fungi, and prokaryotes. Many of these are ‘orphan taxa’, groups that are totally neglected or lack current taxonomists (Janzen & Hallwachs 1994). For example, in many arthropod groups, a taxonomic ‘impediment’ exists at the level of genus, which means specimens cannot be identified much beyond family level. Quite simply, appropriate keys do not exist, old descriptions are unusable, and there are insufficient spe- cialist taxonomists in the world. This problem is not confined to rarely encountered or obscure taxa. In highly biodiverse regions of the world, some of the most abundant families taken in routine trapping cannot be identified much beyond family level. Further, many taxa are ‘open-ended’ by which I mean they are highly speciose, cosmopolitan or spanning several biogeographic regions, and that based on known local faunas, their true diversity cannot even be ac- curately estimated. Apart from being speciose, they often remain uncol- lected or unsorted from mass trapping residues, are unrecorded for vast regions where they undoubtedly occur, and often lack clear generic defini- tion. The total species numbers of such open-ended taxa are as uncertain as the estimates for the total world biota cited above. The effort needed to complete the taxonomic study of such groups is not a simple matter of ap- plying computer technology, as will be discussed later. This paper reviews examples of open-ended taxa in the Diptera drawn from a range of families and genera. This is by no means a complete conspectus, and specialists will be able to suggest additional examples. There are many large (>1,000 spp.), widely distributed and often para- Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools (eds T. Pape, D. Bickel & R. Meier). © 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV. Why Hilara is not Amusing 281 phyletic genera in the Insecta alone, not to mention other classes. Simi- lar open-ended taxa occur in the Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Acari, Crustacea, Nematoda, etc. Also, the discussion below is confined to species based on morphology, as species based on molecular differences are another dimension, outside the scope of the traditional taxonomy discussed here. [For an example of the species richness that might be discerned using molecular techniques, see Condon et al. (2008). Here six sympatric cryptic species of Blepharoneura Loew (Tephritidae) were discovered in the floral calyces ofGurania spinulosa (Cucurbitaceae) in eastern Ecuador. They were ecologically and molecularly distinct, but diagnostic morphological characters to separate the species were not dis- covered.] 1. Examples of Open-Ended Taxa in the Diptera 1.1 Family Cecidomyiidae Adult Cecidomyiidae are fragile flies that are often abundant in trap sam- ples (their numerous body fragments might even be regarded as a major thickening agent in the Malaise trap ‘soup’). Although commonly called ‘gall midges,’ cecidomyiids have a wide range of larval habits. Much of the taxonomic attention given to the family is related to pest management, although the vast majority of species have no economic impact. From a total of 5,451 described species, Gagné (2007) listed the number of Ce- cidomyiidae known to occur in each zoogeographical realm: Palaearctic 3,057, Nearctic 1,169, Neotropical 533, Oriental 335, Australasian 247, Af- rotropical 165, and Oceanian 32. The geographical numbers show a com- mon pattern among many poorly known Diptera families, with the Palae- arctic region having most species, reflecting a long history of research in a settled and accessible region. By itself, Germany has 838 cecidomyiids (Jong 2004), more than any other zoogeographic realm except the Nearc- tic. If the more than 800 species from a recently glaciated Central Euro- pean country is a glimpse of potential cecidomyiid diversity, then the true world total, considering the rich floras, varied habitats and ancient land- scapes of the tropics and southern hemisphere, must be at least 1–2 orders of magnitude greater. This family is truly immense and open-ended, but unlikely to attract casual entomologists, not the least because species are so small and fragile. Further, as Gagné noted, much of the named fauna is Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools (eds T. Pape, D. Bickel & R. Meier). © 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV. 282 D. Bickel poorly described and needs revision in a wider context to have any mean- ing. For further discussion, see Espíritu-Santo & Fernandes (2007) on the diversity of gall-inducing insects in general based on ecological consider- ations. 1.2 Family Ceratopogonidae Culicoides Latreille. Culicoides is a large and difficult genus of some 1,200 described species (Borkent & Wirth 1997), and it includes many species of medical and veterinary importance. The bite of some species causes irritation and allergic reactions in humans, and more importantly, Culi- coides spp. are proven vectors of arboviruses, protozoa and filarial worms, including Bluetongue virus, a serious disease of sheep and cattle. Despite its economic importance, this genus is poorly known. For example, Dyce et al. (2007) published a photographic atlas showing the diagnostic wing patterns for all the Australasian Culicoides species, of which 145 were described and 120 undescribed. This means that 40% of the known Australasian species are represented only by code names and will probably remain in this informal taxonomy for some time. Neverthe- less they are identifiable and of practical use to medical entomologists. Although considerable funding has been available to study and de- scribe potential disease vectors, large and complex genera such as Culi- coides can still present major problems. Dyce et al. (2007) suggested that the publication of their atlas would serve as a framework on which to fine- tune species identification using molecular techniques. Possibly so, but this serves to emphasize the importance of basic morphological identifi- cation before molecular work can proceed. 1.3 Family Corethrellidae Corethrella Coquillett. The Corethrellidae, or frog-biting midges, com- prise a single genus, Corethrella, with both extant and fossil species. The family is predominantly tropical, and females are known to feed on the blood of male frogs, being attracted to them by their mating calls. The en- tire family was treated by Borkent (2008), and of the 97 extant species, 52 were newly described. Of these, 38 species are known from Costa Rica, a country that has been intensively collected, by both general Malaise sam- pling and with frog-call traps. Based on the species collected and regions not visited within Costa Rica, Borkent suggests 35–50 additional species will be found in that small Central American country. Clearly a large un- Diptera Diversity: Status, Challenges and Tools (eds T. Pape, D. Bickel & R. Meier). © 2009 Koninklijke Brill NV. Why Hilara is not Amusing 283 described/ uncollected fauna exists elsewhere, not only in the Neotropics but in the even more poorly known Old World tropics. Here is an example of a fauna whose true diversity cannot even be estimated without a spe- cific collecting technique that targets an aspect of its feeding behaviour.
Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • British Museum (Natural History)
    Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin 's Entomological Notes Kenneth G. V. Smith (Editor) Historical series Vol 14 No 1 24 September 1987 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever-growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff of the Museum and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready, each is complete in itself, available separately, and individually priced. Volumes contain about 300 pages and several volumes may appear within a calendar year. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on either an Annual or Per Volume basis. Prices vary according to the contents of the individual parts. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (hist. Ser.) © British Museum (Natural History), 1987 '""•-C-'- '.;.,, t •••v.'. ISSN 0068-2306 Historical series 0565 ISBN 09003 8 Vol 14 No. 1 pp 1-141 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 24 September 1987 I Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin's Entomological Notes, with an introduction and comments by Kenneth G.
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Corethrellidae) Author(S): Priyanka De Silva and Ximena E
    First Report of the Mating Behavior of a Species of Frog-Biting Midge (Diptera: Corethrellidae) Author(s): Priyanka De Silva and Ximena E. Bernal Source: Florida Entomologist, 96(4):1522-1529. 2013. Published By: Florida Entomological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0434 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.096.0434 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. 1522 Florida Entomologist 96(4) December 2013 FIRST REPORT OF THE MATING BEHAVIOR OF A SPECIES OF FROG-BITING MIDGE (DIPTERA: CORETHRELLIDAE) PRIYANKA DE SILVA1,* AND XIMENA E. BERNAL1, 2 1Department of Biological Science, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 43131, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA 2Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Swarming is a common mating behavior present throughout Diptera and, in particular, in species of lower flies (Nematocerous Diptera).
    [Show full text]
  • Species Delimitation in Asexual Insects of Economic Importance: the Case of Black Scale (Parasaissetia Nigra), a Cosmopolitan Parthenogenetic Pest Scale Insect
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Species delimitation in asexual insects of economic importance: The case of black scale (Parasaissetia nigra), a cosmopolitan parthenogenetic pest scale insect Yen-Po Lin1,2,3*, Robert D. Edwards4, Takumasa Kondo5, Thomas L. Semple3, Lyn G. Cook2 a1111111111 1 College of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 3 Research School of Biology, Division of a1111111111 Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, a1111111111 Australia, 4 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington a1111111111 DC, United States of America, 5 CorporacioÂn Colombiana de InvestigacioÂn Agropecuaria (CORPOICA), a1111111111 Centro de InvestigacioÂn Palmira, Valle del Cauca, Colombia * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Lin Y-P, Edwards RD, Kondo T, Semple TL, Cook LG (2017) Species delimitation in asexual Asexual lineages provide a challenge to species delimitation because species concepts insects of economic importance: The case of black either have little biological meaning for them or are arbitrary, since every individual is mono- scale (Parasaissetia nigra), a cosmopolitan phyletic and reproductively isolated from all other individuals. However, recognition and parthenogenetic pest scale insect. PLoS ONE 12 naming of asexual species is important to conservation and economic applications. Some (5): e0175889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0175889 scale insects are widespread and polyphagous pests of plants, and several species have been found to comprise cryptic species complexes. Parasaissetia nigra (Nietner, 1861) Editor: Wolfgang Arthofer, University of Innsbruck, AUSTRIA (Hemiptera: Coccidae) is a parthenogenetic, cosmopolitan and polyphagous pest that feeds on plant species from more than 80 families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Behavior and Venom System Morphology in Understanding Its Ecology and Evolution
    Toxins 2019, 11, 666; doi:10.3390/toxins11110666 S1 of S11 Supplementary Materials: The Diversity of Venom: The Importance of Behavior and Venom System Morphology in Understanding Its Ecology and Evolution Vanessa Schendel, Lachlan D. Rash, Ronald A. Jenner, and Eivind A. B. Undheim Table S1. Independently evolved venomous animal lineages and the primary ecological roles of their venoms. Taxa for which no direct support of their venomous nature could be found are shown in grey font. General Venom System Animal Group Venomous Lineage Primary Role References Morphology Predation, defense, Cnidarians All Nematocysts [1] intraspecific competition Coleoid Posterior and anterior glands, cephalopods, venom injected through salivary Predation [2,3] including octopus papilla. and squid Long duct/venom gland, venom Cone snails and injected through hollow radular Predation, [4] relatives (Conoidea) tooth on proboscis by a distal defense venom pump. Tritons, helmet Two-lobed salivary (venom) Molluscs shells, etc. glands that open through Predation [5] (Tonnoidea) common duct into buccal mass. Dwarf tritons, Single-lobed salivary (venom) including vampire glands that open through Predation [6] snails common duct into buccal mass. (Colubrariidae) Primary and accessory salivary Murex snails (venom) glands that open Predation [7] (Muricidae) through common duct into buccal mass. Proboscis with venom secreting cells, sometimes with stylet to Nemerteans Ribbon worms facilitate venom delivery Predation [8] (Enopla), or pseudocnidae with a potential role in venom delivery. Toxin-producing “lappets” secreting venom into large Blood worms muscular and glandular venom Predation [9] (Glyceridae) reservoir, which is presumably Annelids also involved in venom expulsion. Secretory cells dispersed along Predation, Leeches (Hirudinea) the buccal cavity in jawed [10–12] blood feeding leeches (Arhynchobdellida); Toxins 2019, 11, 666; doi:10.3390/toxins11110666 S2 of S11 presence of two paired salivary glands in jawless leeches (Glossiphoniidae).
    [Show full text]
  • The Flower Flies and the Unknown Diversity of Drosophilidae (Diptera): a Biodiversity Inventory in the Brazilian Fauna
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/402834; this version posted August 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The flower flies and the unknown diversity of Drosophilidae (Diptera): a biodiversity inventory in the Brazilian fauna Hermes J. Schmitz1 and Vera L. S. Valente2 1 Universidade Federal da Integração-Latino-Americana, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil; [email protected] 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; [email protected] Abstract Diptera is a megadiverse order, reaching its peak of diversity in Neotropics, although our knowledge of dipteran fauna of this region is grossly deficient. This applies even for the most studied families, as Drosophilidae. Despite its position of evidence, most aspects of the biology of these insects are still poorly understood, especially those linked to natural communities. Field studies on drosophilids are highly biased to fruit-breeders species. Flower-breeding drosophilids, however, are worldwide distributed, especially in tropical regions, although being mostly neglected. The present paper shows results of a biodiversity inventory of flower-breeding drosophilids carried out in Brazil, based on samples of 125 plant species, from 47 families. Drosophilids were found in flowers of 56 plant species, of 18 families. The fauna discovered showed to be highly unknown, comprising 28 species, 12 of them (>40%) still undescribed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) Diversity in a Patch of Costa Rican Cloud Forest: Why Inventory Is a Vital Science
    Zootaxa 4402 (1): 053–090 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4402.1.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C2FAF702-664B-4E21-B4AE-404F85210A12 Remarkable fly (Diptera) diversity in a patch of Costa Rican cloud forest: Why inventory is a vital science ART BORKENT1, BRIAN V. BROWN2, PETER H. ADLER3, DALTON DE SOUZA AMORIM4, KEVIN BARBER5, DANIEL BICKEL6, STEPHANIE BOUCHER7, SCOTT E. BROOKS8, JOHN BURGER9, Z.L. BURINGTON10, RENATO S. CAPELLARI11, DANIEL N.R. COSTA12, JEFFREY M. CUMMING8, GREG CURLER13, CARL W. DICK14, J.H. EPLER15, ERIC FISHER16, STEPHEN D. GAIMARI17, JON GELHAUS18, DAVID A. GRIMALDI19, JOHN HASH20, MARTIN HAUSER17, HEIKKI HIPPA21, SERGIO IBÁÑEZ- BERNAL22, MATHIAS JASCHHOF23, ELENA P. KAMENEVA24, PETER H. KERR17, VALERY KORNEYEV24, CHESLAVO A. KORYTKOWSKI†, GIAR-ANN KUNG2, GUNNAR MIKALSEN KVIFTE25, OWEN LONSDALE26, STEPHEN A. MARSHALL27, WAYNE N. MATHIS28, VERNER MICHELSEN29, STEFAN NAGLIS30, ALLEN L. NORRBOM31, STEVEN PAIERO27, THOMAS PAPE32, ALESSANDRE PEREIRA- COLAVITE33, MARC POLLET34, SABRINA ROCHEFORT7, ALESSANDRA RUNG17, JUSTIN B. RUNYON35, JADE SAVAGE36, VERA C. SILVA37, BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR38, JEFFREY H. SKEVINGTON8, JOHN O. STIREMAN III10, JOHN SWANN39, PEKKA VILKAMAA40, TERRY WHEELER††, TERRY WHITWORTH41, MARIA WONG2, D. MONTY WOOD8, NORMAN WOODLEY42, TIFFANY YAU27, THOMAS J. ZAVORTINK43 & MANUEL A. ZUMBADO44 †—deceased. Formerly with the Universidad de Panama ††—deceased. Formerly at McGill University, Canada 1. Research Associate, Royal British Columbia Museum and the American Museum of Natural History, 691-8th Ave. SE, Salmon Arm, BC, V1E 2C2, Canada. Email: [email protected] 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemic Species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 055–114 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.055-114 Endemic species of Christmas Island, Indian Ocean D.J. James1, P.T. Green2, W.F. Humphreys3,4 and J.C.Z. Woinarski5 1 73 Pozieres Ave, Milperra, New South Wales 2214, Australia. 2 Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3083, Australia. 3 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 4 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 5 NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory 0909, Australia, Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Many oceanic islands have high levels of endemism, but also high rates of extinction, such that island species constitute a markedly disproportionate share of the world’s extinctions. One important foundation for the conservation of biodiversity on islands is an inventory of endemic species. In the absence of a comprehensive inventory, conservation effort often defaults to a focus on the better-known and more conspicuous species (typically mammals and birds). Although this component of island biota often needs such conservation attention, such focus may mean that less conspicuous endemic species (especially invertebrates) are neglected and suffer high rates of loss. In this paper, we review the available literature and online resources to compile a list of endemic species that is as comprehensive as possible for the 137 km2 oceanic Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the north-eastern Indian Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Empidoidea (Diptera)
    ZOOTAXA 1180 The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR & JEFFREY M. CUMMING The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) (Zootaxa 1180) 172 pp.; 30 cm. 21 Apr. 2006 ISBN 1-877407-79-8 (paperback) ISBN 1-877407-80-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2006 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41383 Auckland 1030 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2006 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) Zootaxa 1180: 1–172 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1180 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) The morphology, higher-level phylogeny and classification of the Empidoidea (Diptera) BRADLEY J. SINCLAIR1 & JEFFREY M. CUMMING2 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Invertebrate Biodiversity, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, C.E.F., Ottawa, ON, Canada
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tephritidae) Research in Latin America: Myths, Realities and Dreams
    Dezembro, 1999 An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 28(4) 565 FORUM Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) Research in Latin America: Myths, Realities and Dreams MARTÍN ALUJA Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Apartado Postal 63, C.P. 91000, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico This article is dedicated to J.S. Morgante, R.A. Zucchi, A. Malavasi, F.S. Zucoloto, A.S. Nascimento, S. Bressan, L.A.B. Salles, and A. Kovaleski who have greatly contributed to our knowledge on fruit flies and their parasitoids in Latin America An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 28(4): 565-594 (1999) A Pesquisa com Moscas-das-Frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) na América Latina: Mitos, Realidade e Perspectivas RESUMO – Apresento uma avaliação crítica da pesquisa com moscas-das-frutas na América Latina baseada na noção de que muitos mitos e mal-entendidos são transmitidos a estudantes, jovens pesquisadores ou administrações oficiais. Pondero que depois de um esclarecedor início de século, durante o qual muitas descobertas significativas foram feitas sobre a história natural desses insetos, pouco progresso tem sido observado em muitas áreas de pesquisas e manejo de moscas-das-frutas na América Latina durante os últimos 50 anos. Isso tem sido causado em parte pela escassez de estudos sob condições naturais, bem com pela abordagem reducionista utilizada no estudo desses insetos maravilhosos, considerando as espécies individualmente, ou apenas as espécies-praga. Para interromper esse círculo vicioso, proponho que demos mais atenção à história natural das espécies, independente de sua importância econômica, ampliemos o escopo e o período de tempo de nossos estudos, fortaleçamos os fundamentos teóricos e ecológicos das pesquisas com moscas-das-frutas na América Latina e enfatizemos o enfoque comparativo sempre que possível.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]