Mountaineers and Rangers : a History of Federal Forest Management in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mountaineers and Rangers : a History of Federal Forest Management in The Chapter VI World War II Through the Fifties: From FDR to JFK World War II marked the beginning of major economic and jobs in mining and lumbering reopened and new industries demographic changes in the Southern Appalachians. The were established close to the mountains. Although emergency wartime boom was temporary, and afterward the Depression New Deal programs were gradually phased out, the popular returned. Many people left to find work elsewhere; rural farm and effective CCC lasted until war came to America, and the population declined dramatically between 1940 and 1960. Tennessee Valley Authority continued to provide construction Meanwhile, Federal land acquisition nearly stopped as national and related employment through the war years. priorities shifted. The Forest Service had to cope with a major increase in demand for outdoor recreation and balance that Heavy Demand for Timber demand with other forest uses and needs. Although problems Demands on the Nation's timber resource were heavy. Wood of National Forest management in the Southern Appalachians was needed to build bridges, barracks, ships, aircraft, and during the 1950's occurred in apparent calm, the region's above all packing crates for shipping supplies overseas. Vital poverty remained, and the potential conflicts among forest uses wood products were cellulose for explosives, wood plastic, which were to receive national attention in the 1960's had rosin, and glycerol. Wood was classified as a critical material already appeared. by the War Production Board. Although the heaviest demand With the outbreak of war in Europe in September 1939, new for wood fell on the Douglas-fir forests of the West and the and increasing demands were placed on the Nation's coastal southern yellow pines, the hardwoods and conifers of manpower and natural resources, demands that accelerated the southern mountains were also needed. 2 when this country entered the war in December 1941. Wartime The wartime demand for timber increased sales from production and mobilization revitalized the Depression-worn National Forests throughout the South — from 94.2 billion national economy. By 1944 half the country was engaged in board feet in 1939 to 245.3 billion in 1943. 3 High war demands war-related production, and full employment had returned. 1 led to heavy cutting, especially of such desirable hardwoods as The Southern Appalachians experienced a good share of redgum and yellow- (tulip) poplar. There was a strong market wartime changes as coal and timber prices began to rise. Old even for previously unwanted "limby old field pines and inferior hardwoods." The total cut was still less than half of Figure 77. —Crew with crosscut saw and double-bit axe checking large mature the estimated overall timber growth there, however. This was white pine marked for harvest for the Appalachian Forest Products mill near true because the forests all contained considerable second- Clayton, Rabun County, Ga., on Chattahoochee National Forest, July 1941. The growth timber which, although growing rapidly, was still not mill was the first to be operated on a sustained-yield basis in North Georgia and 4 depended on the Forest for most of its timber. (Forest Service photo F-414090) mature enough for harvesting. Reflecting Forest Service policy, and the generally scattered and small volume available, about 90 percent of the timber was disposed of in sales of less than $500 each. The supervisor of the Cumberland (since renamed Daniel Boone) National Forest related in 1941: . one mountain inhabitant purchased sufficient timber in small lots to make 1,200 railroad ties. He hired help to cut the timber; hewed the ties himself; skidded them to the roadside with his own mule; hired trucking of his product to the point of acceptance. He cleared about $600 on his operations. He has 14 children. This $600 was probably more money than the family had seen in the last eight years. 5 Such sales were intended to take care of the little man, but they also made timber sale supervision and coordination harder. As the war went on, forest administration became more difficult. Many men had been drafted or had enlisted. Figure 78. — Crew using peavies to roll a huge yellow-poplar log down to loading Thus, timber stand improvement work, as well as cleanup and platform on Chattahoochee National Forest, July 1941. (Forest Service photo 6 road repair work after timber sales, were not being done. An F-414105) assessment of the situation in Region 8 in 1943 stated that "in general, standards of performance are poorer," largely because Figure 79. —Lumber crew rolling yellow-poplar logs from skidway platform to of our best are in the forces and have truck on Chattahoochee National Forest, July 1941. (Forest Service photo "many men armed had F-414107) to be replaced with poorer ones." 7 i ,-ffl — — < 96 Even a large outfit that had been logging in the region since development of heavy-duty trucks and the "duckbill" coal 1900 felt the pinch. When the supervisor of the Chattahoochee loader helped reduce the need for manpower, a trend that National Forest asked the Gennett Lumber Co. in September accelerated. 15 1944 why it had left logs in an area, an agent responded: Depression-born attempts to diversify the economy of the coal-producing regions were wiped out by the demand of the ... we had not intended to abandon any scaled logs wartime boom. As Caudill describes it: that are on Cynth Creek ... we were forced to move over to so could get to Owl Creek we men operate. The The whole attention of the area's population fastened labor situation got so critical on Creek that Cynth we again on coal. The blossoming farmers among whom 8 things going. could not keep County Agricultural Agents had worked so hard discarded seed sowers and lime spreaders for picks and Since this forced the Forest Service to scale the area twice, a shovels. The small but growing herds of pure-bred penalty was considered. The supervisor explained, "At a time livestock were turned into pork and beef. 16 when we are short of men and pushed to get the job done, the 9 leaving of incompleted areas is costly to both you and us." The same could be said for efforts to develop the timber As discussed earlier, land acquisition had been a major resources of the coal counties. Early in the war the last stands activity before the war. As late as 1937, it was felt that "the of "virgin" hardwood forest in Kentucky were cut. Only in the extension of government ownership in areas of low production cutover lands purchased for the new Cumberland National and high watershed values as in the mountainous . sections Forest was any thought given to creating a sustained-yield 10 [of Region 8] is unquestionably desirable." However, Weeks forest that could provide a continued wood-using industry in Act funds dropped dramatically, from $3 million or more per the area. year to $354,210 in 1943, $100,000 in 1944, $75,000 in 1945, 11 and nothing at all in fiscal year 1946. Figure 80.— Ranger Edgar F. Wolcott, Wythe District, Jefferson National Forest, However, land exchanges continued briskly through the war Va., talking with a local farmer in July 1958. (Forest Service photo F-487235) period. Desirable inholdings and adjacent lands were acquired in exchange for timber from Forest Service lands, with emphasis on facilitating sustained-yield management, experimental forests, and administrative economy. 12 One problem, which was to become of increasing significance later, first appears in reports from war years. This was the decline in personal contact between National Forest officers, especially district rangers, and the people living on or near the forests. A 1943 forest inspection report observed that, because of the volume work, "they (the rangers) know the bankers, members of service clubs, etc., but the lesser lights living on the forest are neglected." 13 Rangers already had less of what oldtimers on the Cherokee refer to as "spit-and-whittle time." Mountain people prefer those who are not in a hurry to 14 do business, but will "set a spell," and visit. Fortunately, a reservoir of goodwill between the Forest Service and mountaineers had been build up during the Depression, chiefly through the CCC. Only after the war would a lessening of such personal contacts lead to friction. Coal Mining Revived In addition to demands for timber, the war brought huge orders for coal, giving the few mining companies that had survived the Depression a new lease on life. As demand grew, new companies were formed, and by 1942 it was boom time again in Southern Appalachian coal country. Miners returned to the delapidated company towns, and new housing was hastily constructed. Old men, youngsters below draft age, and those with serious health problems were accepted for mine work. The military had swept up the cream of mountain youth, fortunately for many of them. However, the 97 The benefits of the wartime boom, however, should not be were granted, and the action would thus be in direct violation exaggerated. As L. E. Perry, a former general ranger district of the stated purposes of the Weeks Act, which authorized the assistant and fire control officer for the Forest Service on the National Forest land purchases. In addition, he noted that a forest, has written of the impact, of the wartime economy on dangerous precedent would be set for National Forests McCreary County, Ky.: throughout the East where mineral rights had been reserved. It was estimated by the Forest Service that 2,000 linear miles of The coal and lumber industry was vigorous in strip-mining in the old Stearns tract could result from approval McCreary County but there was an exodus of the of the request.
Recommended publications
  • Mark Your Calendar
    MARK YOUR CALENDAR OLD FORESTS, NEW MANAGEMENT: CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY–100TH ANNUAL CONSERVATION AND USE OF OLD-GROWTH FORESTS GENERAL MEETING AND CONFERENCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY September 7–10, 2008. Fredericton, New Brunswick. Contact: February 17–21, 2008. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. An interna- CIF, 151 Slater Street, Suite 504 Ottawa, ON K1P 5H3; Phone: tional scientific conference hosted by the CRC for Forestry, 613-234-2242; Fax: 613-234-6181; [email protected]; http://www.cif- Forestry Tasmania, and the International Union of Forest ifc.org/english/e-agms.shtml. Research Organizations. Contact: Conference Design, Sandy Bay Tasmania 7006, Australia; Phone: +61 03 6224 3773; SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS [email protected]; www.cdesign.com.au/oldforests2008/. NATIONAL CONVENTION November 5–9, 2008. Reno, Nevada. Contact: William V. Brumby, ASSOCIATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FOREST Society of American Foresters; Phone: 301-897-8720, ext. 129; PROFESSIONALS CONFERENCE AND ANNUAL GENERAL [email protected]; www.safnet.org. MEETING February 20–22, 2008. Penticton, British Columbia. Theme: “Facets AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of Our Future Forests.” Contact: ExpoFor 2008, Association of ANNUAL MEETING BC Forest Professionals, 1030–1188 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, February 25–March 1, 2009. Tallahassee, Florida. Contact: Fritz BC V6E 4A2. Phone: 604-687-8027; Fax: 604-687-3264; info@expo- Davis, local arrangements chair, at [email protected]; www.aseh.net/ for.ca; http://www.expofor.ca/contactus/contactus.htm. conferences. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY FIRST WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY CONVENTION ANNUAL MEETING August 4–9, 2009. Copenhagen, Denmark. Sponsored by the March 12–16, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Glade Mountain District, Virginia
    COMMONWEALTII OF VIRGINIA VIRGINIA CONS ERV.A,TION COIIMISSION VIRGINIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ARTHUR BEVAN, State Geologist Bulletin 61 Geology and Manganese Deposits of the Glade Mountain District, Virginia By RALPH L. MILLER Pnurnnno By rHE Gnorocrcnr. Sunvny oF TEE Urrrm Smrps Dprunrrvrsxr oF rnp lNtmron UNIVERSITY, VIRGINIA t944 RICHMOND: Drvtsror.r oF PtrRcHAsE AND PRTNTTNG VIRGINIA CONSERVATION COMMISSION Wrr,rrarr A. Wnrcnr, Cl,tairnnan, Richmoncl L. E. Lrcnrona, Vice-Chairrnan, Lynchburg Jenrcs Asrrnv, Stafford C. S. Cenra& Bristol Eowenp W. Leucr, Luray Gooncp PnrNcs Anxor,r, As sis tant C orunai,s sionar, Richmond Rrcrrano A. Grrr,rarr, E.recwtive Secretary and Treasurer, Richmond tIl VIRGINIA DTVISION OF I:IIT.III iI, RtrSoURcEs P. O. -l ''' -''.'s7 Charlottesville, Va. 22903 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CorulroNwnAlTrr oF Vrncrxre i- Vrncrxre Gror,ocrcer, Sunvnv IJNrvansrry oF VTRGTNTA Crrenr,orrEsvrr,r,q Va., March 6, I9M. T o t h e V i.r gini,a C ons ervati,on C orutni,ssi.on : GpNrromrN: I have the honor to transmit for publication .as Bulletin 61 of the Virginia Geological Survey, the text, geologic map, and illustrations of a report on the Geology and Manganese Deposi,ts of the Glade.Moun- tain Di,stri,ct, Virgi,ni,a, by Dr. Ralph L. Miller of the United States Geological Survey. The field work was done and the report was prepared by the Federal Geological Survey as a project in the series of strategic minerals investigations in Virginia and other states. The Glade Mountain district is in Smvth and Wvthe counties. southeast of the Lee Highway (U.S.No.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement for The
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region FEIS for the Croatan LRMP 1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communications of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250- 9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice Or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Management Bulletin Number R8-MB-108C December 2002 2 FEIS for the Croatan LRMP Final Enviromental Impact Statement for the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Croatan National Forest December 2002 Carteret, Craven, and Jones Counties of North Carolina Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Bob Jacobs Regional Forester Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, GA 30367-9102 For More Information: John Ramey Forest Supervisor USDA Forest Service National Forests in North Carolina P.O. Box 2750 Asheville, NC 28802 828-257-4200 Abstract: Six alternatives for revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest are described and compared in this Final Environmental Impact Statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilgrimage Schedule
    50th Annual Spring Wildflower Pilgrimage April 12-14, 2019 CLAYTON, RABUN COUNTY, GEORGIA You are cordially invited to attend the Georgia Botanical Society’s 50th Annual Spring Wildflower Pilgrimage April 12-14, 2019 to be headquartered in Clayton, GA with field trips nearby and in adjoining areas including the Carolinas. We had our 2012 Pilgrimage in Clayton. In 2019 some of the field trip sites will be the same, but this time we will be about three weeks earlier. This means we will focus more on lower elevation sites. The pilgrimage will consist of a Friday night social with light hors d'oeuvres, a Saturday banquet with a special program and more great food. And as usual, there will be our terrific field trips to some very special places located in the region. Nestled in the extreme northeastern corner of Georgia, the 377 square miles of Rabun County comprise only 5% of our state’s part of the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. Sixty percent of the county is in public lands under the management of the US Forest Service or the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. This beautiful mosaic of scenic valleys, high rugged mountains, clear streams, and lush forests is attractive year round, but offers a special floristic bounty each spring. Pilgrimage Schedule Friday, APRIL 12 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Field trips will meet at various times and places. Please consult the description for your particular trip. 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Registration and social at The Diner, Rabun County Civic Center, located at 201 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE FEDERATION Jjoowildu Ulives Rwildr Npnlaces a a Summerll 2019
    North Carolina WILDLIFE FEDERATION JJooWILDu uLIVES rWILDr nPnLACES a a Summerll 2019 THE VOTING RECORD North Carolina’s state and federal legislators make their mark (good or bad) on big moves for conservation PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS DON’T MISS THE NCWF ANNUAL MEETING pathways in conservation BY TIM GESTWICKI, NCWF CEO Bless Your Heart here are many delights of Southern culture, from our food, music, fashion, art, and a fabulous deep-fried dedication Tto sports. And included in any comprehensive list of all things Southern should be language—the sonorous vernacular of the American South. It’s a way of speaking that speaks of politeness and manners, although it often needs translation and interpretation for those from afar. Hollywood and mass entertainment have made the ubiquitous drawled- out “ya’ll” and its hokey, you-never-really-hear-this “ya’ll come back now ya hear” the touchstones of Southern lexicon. They need no interpretation, really, but other phrases send some folks to head scratching. Examples: “I’m full as a tick,” meaning one has eaten too much. “That’s the pot calling the kettle black,” a bromide used when pointing out hypocrisy. One of my favorites is, “Bless your heart.’” Its meanings are a little like “aloha” is to the Hawaiian language, which can be used as both a hello and a goodbye. “Bless your heart” can be used in various settings, with various tones, and a multitude of desired effect. Bless your heart sounds polite and mannerly, with its soft religious undertone, and often it is used just so in the cause of Southern hospitality.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest History Today Spring/Fall 2014
    A PUBLICATION OF THE FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY SPRING/FALL 2014 VOL. 20, NOS. 1 & 2 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT “Not everybody trusts paintings but people believe photographs.”–Ansel Adams STEVEN ANDERSON hen Gifford Pinchot hired the first come from both the FHS Photograph Collec - forest rangers in the U.S. Forest tion and from institutional and individual col- WService, he outfitted them with cam- laborators. By providing an authoritative site eras and asked them to document what they did on the subject, we expect to identify previously and saw. He knew the power the photographs unknown repeat photographic pairs and could wield as he fought for funds to manage sequences, promote the creation of new repeat the nation’s forests and sought public support sets, and foster interest in the future uses of for new policies. No one can deny that visual repeat photography. images have played an important role in the con- Sally Mann, a renowned American landscape servation and environmental movements. and portrait photographer, said, “Photographs That is why, from its beginnings in 1946, the open doors into the past, but they also allow a Forest History Society has collected and pre- look into the future.” We hope that providing served photographs of early lumbering tech- access to and stimulating more work in repeat niques, forest products, forest management, photography will help students, teachers, jour- and other subjects. The FHS staff has already helped thousands nalists, foresters, and many others gain insight that can elevate of students, writers, and scholars find historic photographs that our awareness of conservation challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Tree Farm System Celebrated Its 70Th Anniversary
    In 2011, the American Tree Farm System celebrated its 70th anniversary. After a controversial beginning, it is now an important player in efforts to mitigate climate change. The American Tree Farm System GROWING STEWARDSHIP FROM THE ROOTS “ ill the thing before it spreads,” U.S. Forest Service Chief Lyle Watts allegedly declared. Watts and his assistant C. Edward Behre tried to kill the thing in K 1941. They failed, and it spread from the West, into the South, and eventually all across America. The “thing” was the American Tree Farm System (ATFS), which is now 71 years old and America’s oldest family-owned federal regulation is certainly not to its discredit,” according to woodland sustainability program, covering more than 26 million the journal. privately owned acres. Why were Watts and Behre against tree farms in 1941? PUSH FOR FEDERAL REGULATION Encouraging private owners to grow continuous crops of trees The strong push for federal regulation of forestry had begun in (as tree farming was defined) probably was not abhorrent to them. the 1930s, during America’s Great Depression. Federal forestry What they disliked was substituting private cooperation for public leaders believed that they should closely regulate the private sector, regulation. They saw tree farming as a move to decrease pressure and many people agreed. The National Industrial Recovery Act for federal regulation. of 1933, for example, had authority to coordinate major industries Watts and Behre asked the Society of American Foresters to to set prices, working conditions, and (in the case of forest indus- question the ethics of members who participated in tree farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Management Plan, Idaho
    Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis National Forests Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Revised Wilderness Management Plan and Amendments for Land and Resource Management Plans Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis NFs Located In: Custer, Idaho, Lemhi, and Valley Counties, Idaho Responsible Agency: USDA - Forest Service Responsible David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot NF Officials: Bruce E. Bernhardt, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce NF Mark J. Madrid, Forest Supervisor, Payette NF Lesley W. Thompson, Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon- Challis NF The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ROD--II Table of Contents PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Topographic Maps, Scale 1:24,000 This List Contains The
    Colorado Topographic Maps, scale 1:24,000 This list contains the quadrangle names and publication dates of all Colorado topographic maps published at the scale of 1:24,000 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). One, non-circulating copy of each map is held in the Map Room Office. The Library does not own maps labeled "lacking." The maps are sorted alphabetically by sheet name. Colorado 1:24,000 Topos -- A Abarr 1974 printed 1977 Abarr SE 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Abeyta 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Adams Lake 1974 printed 1978 (dark), 1978 (light) 1974 (without color) printed 1978 1987 printed 1988 Adena 1963 printed 1965, 1975 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1984 printed 1984 1984 (without color) printed 1984 Adler Creek 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Adobe Downs Ranch, New Mexico-Colorado 1963 printed 1965 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1979 printed 1980 (dark), 1980 (light) Adobe Springs 1969 printed 1972, 1992 1969 (without color) printed 1972 Agate 1970 printed 1973 (dark), 1973 (light) 1970 (without color) printed 1973 Agate Mountain 1983 printed 1983 1994 printed 1998 Aguilar 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Akron 1973 printed 1976 1973 (without color) printed 1976 Akron SE 1973 printed 1976 Akron SW 1973 printed 1976 Alamosa East 1966 printed 1968, 1975 1966 (without color) printed 1968 Alamosa West 1966 printed 1969, 1971 1966 (without color) printed 1969 Aldrich Gulch 1957 printed 1958, 1964, 1975 (dark), 1975 (light) 1957 (without color)
    [Show full text]
  • Publications of the Forest History Society
    Publications of the Forest History Society These are books and films available from the Forest History Society The Forest Service and the Greatest Good: A Centennial History, on our website at www.ForestHistory.org/Publications. James G. Lewis, paper $20.00 Tongass Timber: A History of Logging and Timber Utilization in Southeast From THE FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY Alaska, James Mackovjak, $19.95 Issues Series—$9.95 each View From the Top: Forest Service Research, R. Keith Arnold, Books in the Issues Series bring a historical context to today’s most pressing M. B. Dickerman, Robert E. Buckman, $13.00 issues in forestry and natural resource management. These introductory texts are created for a general audience. With DUKE UNIVERSITY PRESS Changing Pacific Forests: Historical Perspectives on the Forest Economy of the Pacific Basin America’s Fires: A Historical Context for Policy and Practice, Stephen J. Pyne , John Dargavel and Richard Tucker, paper $5.00 David T. Mason: Forestry Advocate America’s Forested Wetlands: From Wasteland to Valued Resource, , Elmo Richardson, $8.00 Bernhard Eduard Fernow: A Story of North American Forestry Jeffrey K. Stine , American Forests: A History of Resiliency and Recovery, Andrew Denny Rodgers III, $5.00 Origins of the National Forests: A Centennial Symposium Douglas W. MacCleery , Canada’s Forests: A History, Ken Drushka Harold K. Steen, cloth $10.00, paper $5.00 Changing Tropical Forests: Historical Perspectives on Today’s Challenges in Forest Pharmacy: Medicinal Plants in American Forests, Steven Foster Central and South America Forest Sustainability: The History, the Challenge, the Promise, , Harold K. Steen and Richard P.
    [Show full text]