DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Statement for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Statement for The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region FEIS for the Croatan LRMP 1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communications of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250- 9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice Or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Management Bulletin Number R8-MB-108C December 2002 2 FEIS for the Croatan LRMP Final Enviromental Impact Statement for the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Croatan National Forest December 2002 Carteret, Craven, and Jones Counties of North Carolina Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Bob Jacobs Regional Forester Southern Region 1720 Peachtree Road, NW Atlanta, GA 30367-9102 For More Information: John Ramey Forest Supervisor USDA Forest Service National Forests in North Carolina P.O. Box 2750 Asheville, NC 28802 828-257-4200 Abstract: Six alternatives for revision of the Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest are described and compared in this Final Environmental Impact Statement. The alternatives are labeled A, B, C, C-modified, D and E. Alternative E is the alternative preferred by the Forest Service. The Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest is a companion document that provides the detailed direction of the preferred alternative. The Record of Decision for the Revised Land and Resource Management Plan for the Croatan National Forest is also a companion document that gives the rationale for the preferred alternative. FEIS for the Croatan LRMP 3 This page intentionally left blank. 4 FEIS for the Croatan LRMP Table of Contents SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................................. 11 ISSUES ADDRESSED............................................................................................................................ 11 1. Biological Diversity.................................................................................................................. 11 2. Recreation Opportunities. ......................................................................................................... 12 3. Special Land Allocation............................................................................................................ 12 4. Silviculture, Forest Products and Forest Health. ...................................................................... 12 5. Fire Management. ..................................................................................................................... 12 6. Access. ...................................................................................................................................... 13 7. Local Communities................................................................................................................... 13 RESPONDING TO ISSUES..................................................................................................................... 13 Alternative A---Current Management Direction .......................................................................... 13 Alternative B................................................................................................................................. 13 Alternative C................................................................................................................................. 14 Alternative C-Modified................................................................................................................. 14 Alternative D................................................................................................................................. 14 Alternative E (Preferred)............................................................................................................... 14 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN DETAIL ................................................................ 14 1. Biological Diversity.................................................................................................................. 14 2. Recreation Opportunities .......................................................................................................... 16 3. Special Land Allocations .......................................................................................................... 17 4. Forest Products and Forest Health ............................................................................................ 18 5. Fire Management ...................................................................................................................... 19 6. Access ....................................................................................................................................... 21 7. Local Communities................................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED ......................................................................................................... 23 1.1: Proposed Action.................................................................................................................... 23 1.2: Purpose and Need for the Forest Plan Revision ................................................................... 23 1.3: Public Participation............................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER 2: ALTERNATIVES FOR MANAGING THE CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST................................ 27 2.1: AN ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED BUT NOT STUDIED IN DETAIL.................................................. 27 2.2: ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND STUDIED IN DETAIL ............................................................. 27 2.2.1: Alternative A---Current Management Direction ............................................................... 28 2.2.2: Alternative B...................................................................................................................... 29 2.2.3: Alternative C...................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.4: Alternative C- Modified..................................................................................................... 33 2.2.5: Alternative D...................................................................................................................... 34 2.2.6: Alternative E (preferred).................................................................................................... 36 2.3: COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES BY ISSUE ................................................................................ 38 2.3.1: Biological Diversity........................................................................................................... 38 2.3.2: Recreation Opportunities ................................................................................................... 42 2.3 3: Special Land Allocations................................................................................................... 45 2.3.4: Forest Products and Forest Health..................................................................................... 47 2.3.5: Fire Management ............................................................................................................... 49 2.3.6: Access ................................................................................................................................ 51 2.3.7: Local Communities............................................................................................................ 52 FEIS for the Croatan LRMP 5 2.4: COMPARISON OF MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTION BY ALTERNATIVE ........................................... 54 CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................. 69 3.1: PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................... 69 3.1.1: AIR QUALITY.......................................................................................................................... 69 Affected Environment................................................................................................................... 69 Environmental Effects of Alternatives.......................................................................................... 76 3.1.2. SOILS ...................................................................................................................................... 78 Affected Environment................................................................................................................... 78 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatan National Forest Seasonal Dangers
    .33 .67 .33 .67 .33 ntdSae eateto Agriculture of Department States United ntdSae eateto Agriculture of Department States United 2498158 2530966 2563775 2596583 2629391 2662200 2695008 PURPOSE AND CONTENTS EXPLANATION OF LEGEND ITEMS 77°15'0"W 77°7'30"W 77°0'0"W 76°52'30"W 76°45'0"W oetService Forest OF THIS MAP ot Carolina 2007 North This map dated 08/31/2007 shows the National Forest Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicle Only: System roads, National Forest System trails, and the areas mrc' ra Outdoors Great America's on National Forest System lands in the Croatan National These roads are open only to motor vehicles licensed under Forest that are designated for motor vehicle use pursuant to State law for general operation on all public roads within the 36 CFR 212.51. The map also contains a list of those State. designated roads, trails, and areas that enumerate the types of vehicles that are allowed on each route and in each area Special Vehicle Designation: and any seasonal restrictions that apply on those routes and in those areas. This symbol indicates that the road or trail is open to Designation of a road, trail, or area for motor vehicle use classes of vehicles other than those listed above. Refer to by a particular class of vehicle under 36 CFR 212.51 should the Seasonal and Special Designation Table for further not be interpreted as encouraging or inviting use, or to imply instructions. that the road, trail, or area is passable, actively maintained, or 35°7'30"N safe for travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday October 17, 1996
    10±17±96 Thursday Vol. 61 No. 202 October 17, 1996 Pages 54077±54330 Briefings on How To Use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC, see announcement on the inside cover of this issue. federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 202 / Thursday, October 17, 1996 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), by General online information 202±512±1530 the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records 1±888±293±6498 Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Single copies/back copies: Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the Paper or fiche 512±1800 regulations of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC FEDERAL AGENCIES 20402. Subscriptions: The Federal Register provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 523±5243 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 523±5243 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and For other telephone numbers, see the Reader Aids section Executive Orders and Federal agency documents having general applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published at the end of this issue. by act of Congress and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Federal Register the day before they are published, unless FEDERAL REGISTER WORKSHOP earlier filing is requested by the issuing agency.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE FEDERATION Jjoowildu Ulives Rwildr Npnlaces a a Summerll 2019
    North Carolina WILDLIFE FEDERATION JJooWILDu uLIVES rWILDr nPnLACES a a Summerll 2019 THE VOTING RECORD North Carolina’s state and federal legislators make their mark (good or bad) on big moves for conservation PHOTO CONTEST WINNERS DON’T MISS THE NCWF ANNUAL MEETING pathways in conservation BY TIM GESTWICKI, NCWF CEO Bless Your Heart here are many delights of Southern culture, from our food, music, fashion, art, and a fabulous deep-fried dedication Tto sports. And included in any comprehensive list of all things Southern should be language—the sonorous vernacular of the American South. It’s a way of speaking that speaks of politeness and manners, although it often needs translation and interpretation for those from afar. Hollywood and mass entertainment have made the ubiquitous drawled- out “ya’ll” and its hokey, you-never-really-hear-this “ya’ll come back now ya hear” the touchstones of Southern lexicon. They need no interpretation, really, but other phrases send some folks to head scratching. Examples: “I’m full as a tick,” meaning one has eaten too much. “That’s the pot calling the kettle black,” a bromide used when pointing out hypocrisy. One of my favorites is, “Bless your heart.’” Its meanings are a little like “aloha” is to the Hawaiian language, which can be used as both a hello and a goodbye. “Bless your heart” can be used in various settings, with various tones, and a multitude of desired effect. Bless your heart sounds polite and mannerly, with its soft religious undertone, and often it is used just so in the cause of Southern hospitality.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • View the March 2019 Article “Hike of a Lifetime”
    NC’S PIZZA REVOLUTION P. 5 0 | MARVELOUS MODERNIST HOMES P. 9 4 March 2019 $5.99 MOUNTAINS to SEA TRAIL of a MODERNISM HIKE & LIFETIME MOUNTAINS-TO-SEA TRAIL MOUNTAINS-TO-SEA from Clingmans Dome to Jockey’s Ridge P. 6 8 Along the way: a stunning view of Table Rock from the Mountains-to-Sea Trail. March 2019 North Carolina’s longest trail runs across mountain peaks, past farmland, along rivers, through swamps, down country roads, and across beaches. Some of its most strenuous spots are in the west, including this stretch through the Linville Gorge. PHOTO ESSAY The TRAIL in your own BACKYARD For more than 40 years, the Mountains-to-Sea Trail has stretched nearly 1,200 miles across North Carolina, from a mountaintop on the Tennessee border, along urban greenways and country lanes, to the tallest sand dune on the coast. But for the passionate advocates who work to move the path of of roadways and into woods and fields — a fraction of a mile at a time — improving the trail is an ongoing journey. PHOTOGRAPH BY JUSTIN COSTNER JUSTIN BY PHOTOGRAPH written by JEREMY MARKOVICH 68 OUR STATE | March 2019 ourstate.com 69 County line west of Elkin. Behind a winery are a underneath. Blackley fol- water rush around him, the white noise few lonely graves under a tall walnut tree. One lows, around a hillside, soothing him, the fresh air reviving him. belongs to a man who was George Washington’s beneath the trees, push- This spot was his and his alone, and he bodyguard.
    [Show full text]
  • Tar Heel Pride
    Tar Heel Pride North Carolinians build the Mountains-to-Sea Trail John Manuel appalachia helton Wilder leaned into his pry bar and dislodged the S granite boulder from the side of the mountain. He slid the boulder against the log cribbing and paused to take a breath. Below, on the Blue Ridge Parkway, a motorcycle passed, its throaty rumble fading into the distance. A wood thrush called out from the top of a white pine. Wilder zipped his jacket against the cold. Th ree hundred miles to the east, John Jaskolka slapped a twelve-foot piece of treated lumber across a blackwater slough, step one in the construction of a boardwalk. He glanced at the cypress knees clustered like gnomes at the water’s edge, wiped the sweat from his brow. A sea breeze whispered through the loblolly pines, holding the mosquitoes at bay. Both of these men, volunteers at or near retirement, labored at a single task—the construction of North Carolina’s Mountains-to-Sea Trail. Neither may live to see the trail completed, but the dream that their children or grandchildren may one day walk the path was more than enough to get them out on a Saturday morning. It’s a remarkable eff ort being repeated by countless individuals, young and old, men and women, across the Tar Heel state. When complete, the MST will run approximately 950 miles from its eastern terminus at Jockey’s Ridge on the Outer Banks to the western terminus atop Clingmans Dome in the Smoky Mountains. Th e trail will briefl y overlap with the Appalachian Trail, cross through three national parks, three national forests, more than half-a- dozen state parks, two wilderness areas, and numerous city and county parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2013 to 12/31/2013 National Forests In North Carolina This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R8 - Southern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Chattooga River Boating - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:03/2014 04/2014 James Knibbs Access Notice of Initiation 07/24/2013 803-561-4078 EA Est. Comment Period Public [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Notice 01/2014 Description: The Forest Service is proposing to establish access points for boaters on the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River within the boundaries of three National Forests (Chattahoochee, Nantahala and Sumter). Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=42568 Location: UNIT - Chattooga River Ranger District, Nantahala Ranger District, Andrew Pickens Ranger District. STATE - Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina. COUNTY - Jackson, Macon, Oconee, Rabun. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Access points for boaters:Nantahala RD - Green Creek; Norton Mill and Bull Pen Bridge; Chattooga River RD - Burrells Ford Bridge; and, Andrew Pickens RD - Lick Log. Limits of Stay at Appalachian - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:10/2013 10/2013 Michelle Mitchell National Scenic Trail Shelters Comment Period Public Notice 404-347-1749 and Designated Campsites 08/16/2013 [email protected]. EA Est. Objection Period Legal us Notice 09/2013 Description: The Southern Region of the Forest Service is proposing to change its limits of stay at shelters and designated dispersed campsites along the Appalachian National Scenic Trail on several forests of the Southern Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Appendices...................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1.1 Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) .......................................................1-1 1.1.2 Purpose of Using a Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) to Analyze This Proposed Action..........................................................................................................1-2 1.2 Purpose and Need........................................................................................................................1-3 1.2.1 Purpose of the Proposed Action...........................................................................................1-3 1.2.2 Need for the Proposed Action..............................................................................................1-4
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Management Plan, Idaho
    Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis National Forests Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Revised Wilderness Management Plan and Amendments for Land and Resource Management Plans Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis NFs Located In: Custer, Idaho, Lemhi, and Valley Counties, Idaho Responsible Agency: USDA - Forest Service Responsible David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot NF Officials: Bruce E. Bernhardt, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce NF Mark J. Madrid, Forest Supervisor, Payette NF Lesley W. Thompson, Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon- Challis NF The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ROD--II Table of Contents PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. John Cleeves U.S. Forest Service 4931 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29212
    "John Helms" To: <[email protected]> <[email protected] cc: > Subject: Chattooga Scoping Document 08/28/2007 07:13 PM Mr. John Cleeves U.S. Forest Service 4931 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29212 RE: Chattooga Scoping Document Dear Mr. Cleeves, The USFS’s own capacity study demonstrated that boating is an appropriate use of the Upper Chattooga River, yet 5 of 6 proposed alternatives ban boating on some or all of the upper river. The Upper Chattooga’s capacity to support whitewater boating is not zero, and all action alternatives must allow at least some boating on the entire river. Any alternatives that limit recreation must do so based on the capacity of the river corridor as determined by real data – and must do so equitably. Please do consider as well the fact that boating on the Upper Chattooga is very limited due to the requirements of Mother Nature to provide sufficient rainfall in order for boating to even become possible, which, as you well know happens in a very erratic and (usually) short periods of total calendar days in any given year. Boating allowed on the Upper Chattooga would most certainly be considered low-impact by any standards. However, should I happen to be faced with a "take it or leave it" position regarding this issue, I would place my vote on Proposal #6. Thank you very much for your time and any consideration given. Sincerely, John Helms 102 Wolf Ridge Ct. Hot Springs, AR 71913 <[email protected]> To: [email protected] cc: 08/28/2007 08:57 PM Subject: Chatooga River Comments Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]