DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Item No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Item No AGENDA ITEM NO.: Originator: R MILLS Tel: 247 4557 REPORT OF THE HEAD OF SCRUTINY AND MEMBER DEVELOPMENT MEETING: SCRUTINY BOARD (TRANSFORMING SERVICES) DATE : 27TH OCTOBER 2005 SUBJECT : INQUIRY TO CONSIDER THE PROCEDURES AND CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS WHICH BUS COMPANIES ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW WHEN THEY WISH TO CHANGE BUS TIMETABLES AND OR BUS ROUTES Electoral Wards Affected : ALL Specific Implications For : Ethnic Minorities Women Disabled People 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Scrutiny Board at its meeting on the 29th September 2005 (Session 1), approved the attached terms of reference (Appendix1) for an inquiry to consider the procedures and consultation arrangements which bus companies are required to follow when they wish to change bus timetables and or bus routes. 1.2 The second session of the Board’s inquiry is scheduled for this meeting. 1.3 The West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority / Passenger Transport Executive (METRO) and the Director of Planning are requested to give evidence to this meeting. 2.0 SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE 2.1 The reports of the Director of Passenger Services, West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive and the Director of Planning are attached for consideration by the Board. 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 The Scrutiny Board is requested to consider (i) the attached reports of the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive and Director of Planning and ask questions of the witnesses attending the meeting (ii) determine what, if any, further information the Scrutiny Board requires (iii) confirm the witnesses the Board wish to invite to their next meeting. APPENDIX1 SCRUTINY BOARD (TRANSFORMING SERVICES) INQUIRY TO CONSIDER THE PROCEDURES AND CONSULTATION ARRANGEMENTS WHICH BUS COMPANIES ARE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW WHEN THEY WISH TO CHANGE BUS TIMETABLES AND OR BUS ROUTES TERMS OF REFERENCE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 As a consequence of discussions held by the Scrutiny Board in July 2005 on bus services in the community of Scholes, Members resolved that they wished to undertake an Inquiry to consider the framework within which bus services are delivered and the procedures and consultation arrangements which bus companies are required to follow when they wish to change bus timetables and or bus routes. 1.2 In considering these terms of reference it is acknowledged that as bus services are operated by external providers, the Scrutiny Board can only invite, not insist, that representatives of the bus companies and the Passenger Transport Authority and Metro attend relevant Board meetings. 2.0 SCOPE OF THE INQUIRY 2.1 The purpose of the Inquiry is to make an assessment of and, where appropriate, make recommendations on the following areas: • When bus companies want to change bus timetables and or routes what are the procedures and consultation arrangements they are required to follow? • What opportunities exist for the Council and the public to influence bus routes and quality and frequency of bus services? 3.0 COMMENTS OF THE RELEVANT DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER 3.1 In line with Scrutiny Board Procedure Rule 12.4 the views of the relevant Director and Executive Member have been sought and have been incorporated where appropriate into these Terms of Reference. Full details are available on request to the Scrutiny Support Unit. 4.0 TIMETABLE FOR THE INQUIRY 4.1 The Inquiry will take place over four sessions with a final report being produced in December 2005. 4.2 The length of the Inquiry is subject to change. 5.0 SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE 5.1 SESSION ONE – 29th September 2005 To agree Terms of Reference for this Inquiry. 5.2 SESSION TWO – 27th OCTOBER 2005 The West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority and Passenger Transport Executive (Metro) to give evidence by providing a report and presentation covering the following: • How bus services are delivered in Leeds and the surrounding area? • What is the legal position with regard to the provision of bus services and who is allowed to operate these and what restrictions apply? • What is the role of Metro and the Passenger Transport Authority in this process? • What is the procedure for timetabling bus services? • What consultation procedures are bus operators required to follow when proposing changes to bus service provision and routes or increasing fares? • What are “Bus Quality Partnerships” and “Bus Quality Contracts”? • What cost and risk assessments are carried out when bus operators wish to change bus routes or vary services and what is the review process after implementation? • Whether the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority can reduce the subsidies it pays to bus operators who change bus routes and vary services and what other penalties can be applied to bus operators in these circumstances? • Details of complaints received from the public as a consequence of bus companies varying bus services and or changing bus routes in 2004/2005 and what action was taken as a result of those complaints? • What sanctions are available to the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority when operators fail to perform to punctuality and reliability standards on commercial and tendered services? • What powers do the West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority have to secure integration between bus services and other public transport modes. The Director of Development to report on the Local Transport Plan in relation to bus services in Leeds. 5.3 SESSION THREE - 24th NOVEMBER 2005 To receive evidence from the following witnesses: • Managing Director of First Bus Group • Operators Group representing bus companies • Transport 2000 • Voluntary Groups including representatives from the community of Scholes involved with the deputation to Council on bus services. The Board to consider initial conclusions and recommendations. 5.5 SESSION FOUR – 22ND DECEMBER 2005 To finalise the Board’s comments and recommendations. 6.0 WITNESSES 6.1 The following witnesses have been identified as possible contributors to the Inquiry: • West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Authority • Passenger Transport Executive (Metro) • Director of Development • Managing Director First Bus Group • Operators Group representing bus companies • Transport 2000 • Voluntary Groups including representatives from the community of Scholes LEEDS CITY COUNCIL – SCRUTINY OF BUS SERVICES SCRUTINY BOARD (TRANSFORMING SERVICES) 27TH OCTOBER 2005 INFORMATION REQUESTED FROM METRO 1.0 The Legal Framework for the Provision of Bus Services in Leeds and the Surrounding Area 1.1 Outside London, operators provide bus services in the main on a commercial, profit-making basis. Metro refers to these as commercial services, and these account for about 80% of bus mileage. 1.2 Some services, about 20% of bus mileage, are operated under contract to Metro, who refers to these as tendered services. 1.3 Private companies provide all bus services in West Yorkshire. Metro is not allowed by law to run (or even own) buses. 1.4 To run a bus service, an operator needs to have an Operator’s License that is granted by the Traffic Commissioner. To qualify for a license a person has to show that they are of “good repute”, have sufficient financial standing and have adequate maintenance facilities. Once they have a license they have to give eight weeks notice to the Traffic Commissioner that they want to run a service (this is known as “registration”). There are very few grounds for the Traffic Commissioner to refuse a registration and these powers are rarely invoked. 1.5 Metro and the Traffic Commissioner have no control over what timetable is run or what fares are charged on commercial services. 1.6 The Traffic Commissioners’ surveyors monitor services to make sure that operators are doing what they said they would do on their registration. The Traffic Commissioner has very little resource for this activity. 1.7 The Vehicle Inspectorate also checks operators to make sure that they are maintaining their buses in accordance with their license. 1.8 The Traffic Commissioner can impose penalties on operators if they are either: • Failing to run services in accordance with their timetable to an unreasonable extent • Failing to maintain their buses to the required standard • Have been found guilty of an offence that would mean they have lost “repute” 1.9 The penalties available are financial, removing operators off a service, reducing the number of buses they can operate or revocation of license (usually only used in the case of loss of repute). In most instances, a first offence (unless very serious) would receive a formal warning. 2.0 Role of Metro 2.1 Metro spends over £35 million each year in supporting bus services through tendered service contracts and concessionary travel 2.2 Metro is not the regulatory body for local bus services and cannot determine routes, fares, frequencies, or vehicle type for services provided on a commercial basis. Metro is not allowed to run (or, in general, even own) buses. 2.3 Metro seeks to influence operator decisions on commercial services through ongoing dialogue. 2.4 Metro has a duty to consider social needs not met by commercial services and a power to secure these. Metro secures socially necessary services from operators, usually through competitive tender (although there is not a strong market with, on average, 1.04 bids per tender). 2.5 Metro provides passenger facilities (bus stations, stops and shelters), passenger information, administers the MetroCard scheme and funds and provides a comprehensive concessionary travel scheme. Metro coordinates the production of the Local Transport Plan. Metro works in partnership with operators, District Councils and others to improve provision and encourage the use of bus services. 2.6 Metro is generally regarded as a well-run and effective PTA/E, is a Guardian Top 100 employer and has gained numerous national awards including the innovative investments with Leeds City Council on guided busways. 3.0 Route Planning and Timetabling 3.1 On commercial services, bus operators plan and timetable their own services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wearing of Face Masks on Buses
    Face coverings on school buses Wearing a face covering on school buses will become a condition of travel from Monday 21 September 2020. When schools returned earlier this month, face coverings were strongly recommended for all students from the age of 11 (unless they are medically exempt). However, due to many buses now running at full capacity, including standing passengers, and many students not following this recommendation it has now become necessary to make it a condition of travel. This change brings school buses in line with the main network buses where face coverings are already a condition of travel. From Monday 21 September, any student boarding a school bus will be asked to wear a face covering. Those that do not have one can purchase a disposable mask from the driver for 60p. Any student who is medically exempt from wearing a face covering can apply for an exemption card by contacting their school or the customer service desk at Liberation Station. Face coverings for students under the age of 11 remains optional. Kevin Hart, Director for LibertyBus has said: “We’ve monitored bus capacities over the first few weeks of term and have found that many are now running at full capacity. We had hoped that by strongly recommending face coverings on school buses the majority of students would comply, but unfortunately this has not been the case and its become necessary to enforce this more strongly.” “For the first few weeks of the new regulations we will be helping to ensure every student has a face covering and masks will be given for free to anyone who does not have the funds to pay for one.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Transport Differently
    Doing Transport Differently How to access public transport – a guide for everyone with lived experience of disabilty or health conditions Doing Transport Differently How to access public transport – a guide for everyone with lived experience of disabilty or health conditions Doing Transport Differently How to access public transport – a guide for everyone with lived experience of disabilty or health conditions How to use this guide Where should I start? This guide is aimed at people with If you’re not yet using public transport lived experience of disability or health for whatever reason and want to know conditions and at those advising or what’s possible, go to section two. working with them. Using a question For an overview of the law as it relates and answer approach to enable different to transport, go to section two. people with different travel needs to dip To begin planning a journey, short or into it in different ways, it will show you long, go to section three. how far access to public transport has For information and advice on using improved and how to make use of it. buses or coaches, go to section four. For information and advice on using trains, go to section five. For information and advice on underground trains, go to section six. For information and advice on light rail and tramways, ferries and other forms of transport, go to section seven. The resources section includes both useful websites and useful phone numbers to keep with you when you travel. 2 Contents Contents Foreword – Genevieve Barr 6 Foreword – Sir Bert Massie
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Your Hospital
    Choosing your hospital Leeds Primary Care Trust For most medical conditions, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment. This booklet explains more about choosing your hospital. You will also find information about the hospitals you can choose from. Second edition December 2006 Contents What is patient choice? 1 Making your choice 2 How to use this booklet 3 Where can I have my treatment? 4 Your hospitals A to Z 7 Your questions answered 30 How to book your appointment 32 What do the specialty names mean? 33 What does the healthcare jargon mean? 35 Where can I find more information and support? 37 How do your hospitals score? 38 Hospital score table 42 What is patient choice? If you and your GP decide that you need to see a specialist for more treatment, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment from a list of hospitals or clinics. Why has patient choice been introduced? Research has shown that patients want to be more involved in making decisions and choosing their healthcare. Most of the patients who are offered a choice of hospital consider the experience to be positive and valuable. The NHS is changing to give you more choice and flexibility in how you are treated. Your choices Your local choices are included in this booklet. If you do not want to receive your treatment at a local hospital, your GP will be able to tell you about your choices of other hospitals across England. As well as the hospitals listed in this booklet, your GP may be able to suggest community-based services, such as GPs with Special Interests or community clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Were Particular Features Determined for the Purposes of the Engagement
    Important notice This Report, ‘An economic evaluation of local bus infrastructure investment’ (‘Report’) has been prepared by KPMG LLP solely for Greener Journeys in accordance with specific terms of reference (‘terms of reference’) agreed between Greener Journeys ‘the Addressee’, and KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP wishes all parties to be aware that KPMG LLP's work for the Addressee was performed to meet specific terms of reference agreed between the Addressee and KPMG LLP and that there were particular features determined for the purposes of the engagement. The Report should not therefore be regarded as suitable to be used or relied on by any other person or for any other purpose. The Report is issued to all parties on the basis that it is for information only. Should any party choose to rely on the Report they do so at their own risk. KPMG LLP will accordingly accept no responsibility or liability in respect of the Report to any party other than the Addressee. Contents 1 Executive summary 1 2 Existing evaluation frameworks 7 3 Case study evaluations 11 4 Wider economic impacts 21 5 Evaluation programmes 24 6 Conclusions 27 7 Appendices – Full case studies 28 1 Executive summary Introduction There is a growing interest in the importance of towns and cities to our economic and social welfare, in what makes them successful and how we can shape their development. Transport networks and local bus services are a particularly important part of this agenda. The ease at which we can get around influences where we live and work, where we are educated, how easily we can attend to our healthcare needs, as well as the leisure and retail activities that we participate in.
    [Show full text]
  • GNER Cleethorpes
    Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE 28th March 2014 Rachel Gilliland Customer Relationship Executive Network Rail 4th Floor Kings Place York Way London N1 9AG Dear Rachel, REF. SECTION 17 PROPOSEDTRACK ACCESS CONTRACT: (ALLIANCE RAIL HOLDINGS - GREAT NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY) I write in response to the above mentioned consultation. Metro has had constructive dialogue with Alliance Rail in the recent past on its GNER proposal, including for investment in station facilities/a new strategic park and ride rail facility in the east of Leeds rail corridor. Metro is in principle supportive of the Alliance Rail proposal to run direct services between Bradford Forster Square/Ilkley and London, however is not in a position to support the specific proposal at this time, due to a number of questions we have, and a particular timing issue as outlined below. • The Leeds City Region Transport Strategy highlights the need for improved connectivity between the City Region and London to support the economic future of our region. As a major and growing city, Bradford has relatively poor connectivity with London when compared to other cities of equivalent size. Indeed the emerging evidence from the work of the East Coast Main Line (ECML) Authorities grouping, of which Metro is part, suggests that of all the “off-route” destinations served by Long Distance High Speed (LDHS) services, improving connectivity between Bradford and London would deliver a very high level of economic benefit to UK Plc. • Metro is also currently the promoter of 3 new stations in West Yorkshire, including at Kirkstall Forge, which is a major brownfield land regeneration site in the City of Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Menston and the Railway
    Appendix 2 MENSTON RESPONSE to: Derry Hill application ref. 10/04551/MAF & Bingley Road application ref. 10/06229/MAO Menston and the Railway No more room on the train. CONTENTS SUSTAINABLE TRAIN TRAVEL DATA / INFORMATION ................................................................................................2 Network Rail Northern Utilisation Strategy (October 2010)................................................................................2 Public Transport Executive (PTE) data......................................................................................................................2 West Yorkshire Metro data (2009) ...............................................................................................................................2 Northern Rail franchise...................................................................................................................................................2 METRO Strategy ................................................................................................................................................................2 Menston Train services...................................................................................................................................................3 Menston Station Car Parking ........................................................................................................................................3 Car parking in the vicinity of the Railway Station..................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • A NEW ERA for URBAN TRANSPORT Pteg Becomes the Urban Transport Group
    A NEW ERA FOR URBAN TRANSPORT pteg becomes the Urban Transport Group brought to you by 01_UTC_2015_5_4.indd 5 04/01/2016 17:03 Building a better tomorrow, today At Atkins, we work in partnership with our clients to shape the future of transportation. We create and deliver sustainable, innovative solutions to meet tomorrow’s urban transport challenges. www.atkinsglobal.com 03_UTG_2015.indd 2 04/01/2016 17:04 FOREWORD Building a better BUILDING ON SUCCESS tomorrow, today am delighted to provide the foreword able to share its experience on smart ticketing, delivering to this publication marking the investment and, in light of the government’s Buses Bill, newly-named Urban Transport Group. contracting for bus services. At Atkins, we work in partnership with our I Almost ! ve decades have passed since " e Buses Bill is a reminder of how in many ways clients to shape the future of transportation. Parliament voted for the 1968 Transport transport policy has come full circle. " e visionary Act which led to the creation of the Passenger Transport principles of the Transport Act - in which responsibility We create and deliver sustainable, innovative Executives. It is a mark of the Passenger Transport for local transport is handed to regional authorities - is solutions to meet tomorrow’s urban transport Executives’ success in that time that Transport for at the forefront of political thinking today. Devolution of challenges. London has now joined the Urban Transport Group as a power and accountability to local areas, bus franchising full member. " e group’s seven strategic transport bodies and better partnership working, smart ticketing, the will serve upwards of 20 million people - an astonishing drive for greater e$ ciency and a fresh recognition of the number that will no doubt grow still further.
    [Show full text]
  • PSPO Review July 2019 Appendix B Airedale Shopping Centre
    PSPO Review July 2019 Appendix B Review consultees Bradford Type Organisation Role Consultee e-mail or address Method When done Public service Police Police and Crime Commissioner e-mail 22/07/2019 Bradford Divisional Commander e-mail 22/07/2019 e-mail 22/07/2019 City Centre Inspector e-mail 22/07/2019 West Inspector e-mail 22/07/2019 e-mail 22/07/2019 e-mail 22/07/2019 e-mail, by hand or Businesses and organisations Businesses letter 22/07/2019 University University of Bradford e-mail 22/07/2019 College Bradford College e-mail 22/07/2019 22/07/2019 Hospitals St Lukes e-mail Bradford District Tenants and Community representatives Residents and tenants associations Residents Federation Letter 22/07/2019 Little Germany Action Ltd e-mail 22/07/2019 Representative organisations Bradford Trident CIC e-mail 22/07/2019 Ward Councillors (East, West, Community Leaders Bradford Council South) e-mail 22/07/2019 Representative groups Bradford Chamber of Commerce e-mail 22/07/2019 Bradford District Chamber of Trade e-mail 22/07/2019 University of Bradford Student Union Subira Ismail e-mail 22/07/2019 Bradford College Student Union e-mail 22/07/2019 Housing associations Horton Housing Association e-mail 22/07/2019 Abigail Housing e-mail 22/07/2019 Manningham Housing Association Ulfat Letter 22/07/2019 Substance misuse support projects CGL Katrina Kairo e-mail 22/07/2019 Bridge Project e-mail 22/07/2019 Council staff Safer and Stronger Communities Partnerships and others Partnership e-mail 22/07/2019 City/Outer ASB Group e-mail Bradford Council - Public
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport and Social Inclusion: a Good Practice Guide
    pteg good practice guide Transport and Social Inclusion Contents 1.Foreword 2.Executive Summary 3.Introduction 4.Projects • The Availability and Physical Accessibility of Transport • Cost of Transport • Services and Activities Located in Inaccessible Locations • Safety and Security • Travel Horizons Foreword The Government’s Social Exclusion Unit Government’s ambitious objectives for has rightly highlighted better access to tackling social exclusion. This guide is jobs, healthcare, shops and education part of that process. It aims to help as key to unlocking opportunities for raise awareness among transport planners deprived communities. As a result and policy makers of some of the 1 ‘accessibility planning’ will become a innovative schemes now underway in cornerstone of the next round of Local PTE areas and the lessons that can be Transport Plans. 84 out of the 100 most learnt from them. deprived neighbourhoods are in PTE areas, and pteg is fully committed to Neil Scales playing a key role in achieving the Director General Merseytravel and lead DG for pteg on social inclusion 01 Executive Summary The availability and physical All this helps explain why two out of accessibility of transport five jobseekers say lack of transport is a barrier to getting a job and 31% of In recent decades travel patterns have people without a car have difficulties become more complex, distances travelling to their local hospital. 2 travelled have become longer, and society is no longer focussed so strongly PTEs have been at the forefront of on the nine to five working day. exploring innovative new ways of overcoming the lack of availability or Society has become organised around accessibility of transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Sheffield Also Has an Amazing Arts Scene! Snooker and a Friendly Rival to Leeds
    Sheffield Sheffield is one of the main cities in South Yorkshire Sheffield also has an amazing arts scene! Snooker and a friendly rival to Leeds. As England’s greenest fans will know that Sheffield houses the Crucible, but city, with friendly locals and rich heritage, Sheffield really is a fantastic place to live. There is plenty to discover, whether you are interested in shopping, culture, nature, sports, or food. | Housing Rental prices in Sheffield are reasonable, with £400- 550 pcm affording a decent 1 bedroom flat or £600- The Crucible Theatre 750 pcm for a 2 bedroom flat, depending on which this theatre puts on many other shows throughout the area of the city you want to stay in. Ecclesall Road, year. Sheffield also hosts Doc/Fest, a yearly Broomhill and Crookes are popular with students and documentary festival, in addition to lots of other local professionals alike and you find some nice properties festivals that take place throughout the year such as in this area. House shares are also easy to come by Tramlines in July. Sheffield MotorPoint arena, just within these popular areas, and the rental market outside the city, is home to a number of stadium gigs moves quite quickly. – from stand-up comedy to globally sold out concerts. The city is steeped in sporting heritage and home to Olympian Jessica Ennis. With football, rugby, swimming and golf facilities, as well as multiple ice rinks, there really is something for everyone. Just make sure you don’t confuse your United with your Wednesday as football club rivalry is fierce.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Review of Public Transport Models
    DISTILLATE PROJECT F Appendix B REVIEW OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODELS April 2006 Author: J.D. Shires 1 Contents Page No. Introduction 4 Section 1 Simple Elasticity Models 6 1.1 Passenger Demand Forecasting Handbook (PDFH) 6 1.2 Area Review Model 7 1.3 Demand for Public Transport 8 Section 2 DfTGuidance on Public Transport Modelling 10 Section 3 Rail Models 12 3.1 The Framework Model (RIFF) 12 3.2 The Lythgoe Model 13 3.3 PRAISE (Privatised Rail Services) Model 14 3.4 National Rail Model (NRM) 15 3.5 Planet Suite 16 3.6 West Yorkshire METRO Model 17 Section 4 Bus Models 20 4.1 Economic Modelling Approach 20 4.2 Quality Bus Model 20 4.3 NERA & LEK Models for CfIT 21 Section 5 Multi-modal and Network Based Models 24 5.1 Road Traffic & Public Transport Assignment Models 24 - Principles 24 - Models 25 • PT-SATURN 25 • EMME/2 26 • TRIPS 27 • VIPS 27 • VISUM 27 5.2 Micro-Simulation Models 27 - Principles 27 - Models 28 • STEER 28 • DRACULA 28 5.3 Multi-modal Demand Models 28 - Principles 28 - Models 29 • METS 29 • MUPPIT 30 5.4 Land Use/Transport Intercation (LUTI) & Strategic Demand Models 31 - Principles 31 - Models 32 • MEPLAN 32 • TRANUS 32 • TPM 33 • MARS 33 • START/DELTA 34 • STM 34 Section 6 Comparison of the Models & Research Gaps 35 6.1 Rail Models 40 6.2 Bus Models 40 6.3 Simple Elasticity Recommendations 40 6.4 Multi-modal Modals 41 6.4.1 Road Traffic & Public Assignment Models 41 2 6.4.2 Micro-Simulation Models 41 6.4.3 Demand Models 41 6.4.4 Land-Use/Transport Interaction (LUTI) Models 41 6.5 Gaps in Research 47 6.5.1 General Gaps 47
    [Show full text]
  • First Bradford, First Halifax, First Huddersfield, First Leeds
    First West Yorkshire: (PB0000815) First Bradford, First Halifax, First Huddersfield, First Leeds, Leeds City First York (PB0001747) First West Yorkshire Limited; First York Limited, Hunslet Park Depot, Donisthorpe Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 1PL Part of FirstGroup PLC. Depots: Bradford Bowling Back Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD4 8SP Bramley Bramley Garage, Henconner Lane, Bramley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS13 4LD Halifax Skircoat Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 2RF Huddersfield Old Fieldhouse Lane, Deighton, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD2 1AG Hunslet Park Hunslet Park Depot, Donisthorpe Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 1PL York 7 James Street, York, North Yorkshire, YO10 3WW Outstations: Millwood Millwood Garage, Todmorden, West Yorkshire, OL14 6SB 11101 - 11107 Vehicle Type: Mercedes-Benz Citaro 0.530G Body Type: Mercedes-Benz Citaro Fleet No: Reg No: Seat Type: Year: Depot: Livery: Notes: 11101 BG58OLR AB49T 2009 York York Park & Ride 11102 BG58OLT AB49T 2009 York York Park & Ride 11103 BG58OLU AB49T 2009 York York Park & Ride 11104 BG58OLV AB49T 2009 York York Park & Ride 11105 BG58OLX AB49T 2009 York York Park & Ride 11107 w BG58OMB AB49T 2009 York Park & Ride York 30572 - 31140 Vehicle Type: Volvo B7TL-57 Body Type: Alexander ALX400 Fleet No: Reg No: Seat Type: Year: Depot: Livery: Notes: 30572 WU02KVO H49/29F 2002 Halifax First FSY, 2016 30576 WU02KVT H49/29F 2002 Halifax First FSY, 2016 30943 Y798XNW H49/27F 2001 Huddersfield First Huddersfield 30949 YJ51RRX H49/27F 2001 Huddersfield First Huddersfield 30950
    [Show full text]