Keyspan Energy Delivery (New York and Long Island)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Keyspan Energy Delivery (New York and Long Island) Third Quarter 2000 KeySpan Corporation One MetroTech Center Brooklyn, NY 11201 Michael J. Taunton Vice President and Treasurer (718) 403-3265 [email protected] Kenneth D. Daly Director, Investor Relations (718) 403-3385 [email protected] Ellen B. Kessler Investor Relations Analyst (718) 403-6977 [email protected] For more information visit us on the world wide web http://www.keyspanenergy.com This issue of the Quarterly Update is printed on recycled paper with soy ink. In this edition of our Quarterly Update, we are pleased to announce the completion of the acquisitions of Eastern Enterprises and EnergyNorth -- approximately one year after the transactions were announced. These acquisitions provide us with tremendous growth potential as we are now the largest gas company in the Northeast United States and among the 5 largest gas companies in the country. We also report our record Third Quarter earnings and positive outlook going forward. • Eastern Enterprises and EnergyNorth Acquisitions Completed • Gas Growth Opportunities • myHomeKey Update • 3rd Quarter Earnings Please feel free to contact me at (718) 403-3265 if you need further information. We appreciate your investment and support of KeySpan. Sincerely, Michael J. Taunton Vice President and Treasurer © KeySpan Corporation, November 2000 2 KeySpan Acquires Eastern Enterprises and EnergyNorth —Largest Natural Gas Company in Northeast Formed— Our goal is to convert many of the potential customers to gas, and to sell them new energy products and services by applying the same successful marketing techniques we have implemented in New York and on Long Island (see related article inside). "This expansion is a milestone in our company’s history, exemplifying our growth strategy and vision of becoming the premier energy and services company in the Northeast. It provides access to more than 5 million customers and a platform for growth of our gas and electric businesses and our energy-services subsidiaries,” said Robert B. Catell, chairman and chief executive officer On November 8, 2000, KeySpan completed its acquisitions of KeySpan. of Eastern Enterprises and EnergyNorth -- the largest gas companies in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, respectively. These acquisitions are a major step in KeySpan’s strategy to become the premier energy and services company in the Northeast. We now have 2.4 million gas customers, making us the largest gas distribution company in this region, and the 5th largest in the United States. Eastern Enterprises was the parent company of Boston Gas, Colonial Gas and Essex Gas, and was in the process of acquiring EnergyNorth. All former Eastern and The New England Opportunity EnergyNorth utilities are now Residential Saturation 35% Current Customer Base 800,000 identified as KeySpan Energy Remaining Prospects 916,000 Residential Existing Gross Profit Margin $389M Heating Prospects Delivery New England. In Remaining Gross Profit Margin $750M New England acquiring these companies, we 916,000 Customers have added 800,000 gas 157,000 customers and now have the With Gas Service opportunity to grow our gas 180,000 Near gas main business in New England – an affluent region with a low (continued on page 4) penetration of natural gas. 579,000 Other Customers Currently, only 35% of the customers in New England use natural gas for home heating. 3 KeySpan Acquires Eastern Enterprises and EnergyNorth —Largest Natural Gas Company in Northeast Formed— (continued from page 3) Growth Opportunities Financing the Acquisitions KeySpan expects the acquisition to yield pre-tax annual The purchase is valued at approximately $2.5 billion -- savings of approximately $40 million, resulting primarily $1.96 billion in equity and the assumption of $550 million from the elimination of duplicate programs, greater in debt. KeySpan will ultimately finance the acquisitions efficiencies, the consolidation of information systems, and with a $1.65 billion issuance of five, ten and thirty-year personnel reductions. The main driver of the transaction, bonds. In addition, the balance of the Company’s short- however, is the growth opportunity. In the New England term and seasonal capital needs will be financed in the service territory, there are more than 900,000 potential commercial paper markets. Along these lines, Standard & customers – primarily customers who are presently heating Poor’s has upgraded KeySpan’s rating to a solid ‘A’ rating, their homes with oil. Of these potential customers, more Moody’s recently re-affirmed the long-term ‘A3’ rating, than 150,000 already have a gas service for cooking or hot and Fitch has issued an ‘A-‘ rating on the Company. water. In addition, another 180,000 customers are in close proximity to a gas main. These customers require a KeySpan now has assets of more than $10 billion, minimal capital investment and provide the opportunity projected annual revenues of $5 billion, and nearly 14,000 for short pay back periods and attractive returns. We employees. KeySpan has also registered its holding estimate that there is approximately $750 million of company under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act potential annual gross profit margin remaining in New with the Securities and Exchange Commission. England, approximately double the current amount. Terms for Shareholders I Eastern Enterprises shareholders will receive an acquisition price of $64.558 per share (including a ‘ticking fee’), paid in cash, plus a portion of the fourth quarter dividend equal to $0.1692 per share. I EnergyNorth shareholders will receive an acquisition price of $61.4587 per share (including a ‘ticking fee’), paid in cash, plus a prorated dividend of $0.2683 per share. I KeySpan shareholders are not affected by this transaction, therefore, no action is required. 4 Northeast. KeySpan’s business strategy with myHomeKey.com seeks to: • Extend KeySpan’s reach beyond its traditional util- ity borders into new areas • Provide the opportunity to market new products and services to customers throughout the KeySpan Launches myHomeKey.com Northeast • Establish KeySpan in the forefront of the new econ- “Your Home Management” Web Site omy being shaped by e-commerce The myHomeKey.com site from KeySpan currently pro- In September, KeySpan officially launched its first vides services to communities in New York, New Jersey, e-commerce web site, www.myHomeKey.com. The Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New myHomeKey.com site is an innovative, co-branded Web Hampshire. Over the next several months, KeySpan will be portal that gives busy consumers the advantage of conven- adding new features to the site, including more household ient, one-stop, ’round-the-clock, on-line access to a compre- appliances and small electronics, special incentives for reg- hensive set of home management services and solutions. istered members of the site, and expanded information of KeySpan MHK, Inc., a separate subsidiary of KeySpan, has interest to local community groups. developed the new web site with myHomeKey.com, Inc. Using zip codes, www.myHomeKey.com provides free, personalized services, products, and information to con- sumers. The web site features six home-related categories: • Shop for Products Company Update • Schedule a Service • Home Energy • Home Connections Gas Supply Update • Neighborhood On the national scene, gas supply storage is below the • My Information historic inventory levels. However, in the KeySpan mar- ket area, storages are on target as our inventory was at Recently, Sears HomeCentral’s vast network of qualified 97% of capacity at the end of the injection season. service technicians became a part of the on-line appliance service offering from myHomeKey.com. Sears joins other Although KeySpan will enter the heating season well companies on the site including such highly-recognized prepared as far as inventory is concerned, the price brand names as GE and Amana. impact on our customers is a big concern. We have During the eight weeks since its launch the web site has utilized our gas supply expertise to minimize the com- experienced rapid growth with approximately 30,000 peo- modity costs, yet we are projecting an approximate 25% ple around the country becoming registered members of increase in our customers' gas bills. The higher prices the site, of which nearly half are in the KeySpan market. could have an impact on our record level of gas conver- Simultaneous to the launch of the web site, an extensive sions. However, it should be noted that we have never advertising campaign began that included both traditional sold our product on the basis of price, but rather on the and new media. Ads have appeared in major New York benefits of natural gas, and are therefore expecting to metropolitan and suburban newspapers, commercials are continue a high level of growth. on radio stations, and on-line banner ads were placed on major Internet search engines. The campaign features peo- KeySpan Acquires Remaining 50% ple enjoying their new-found leisure time after using of Gulf Midstream Services myHomeKey.com services. New advertising and promo- tional efforts will be initiated in the Boston metropolitan KeySpan acquired Gulf Canada’s 50 percent interest in area beginning early next year. Gulf Midstream Services (GMS) on October 16, 2000. KeySpan is now the sole owner of this leading KeySpan announced its partnership with independent midstream services company in western myHomeKey.com, Inc. last March, which included a Canada — which will be known as KeySpan Energy $12.5 million investment. Another major investor in the Canada (KEC). KeySpan acquired its initial 50 percent home management concept is Dallas-based TXU Energy interest in GMS from Gulf in December 1998. No Services. More energy service companies are expected to form partnerships soon in different regions of the country. additional equity was required to complete this transaction, which enabled KeySpan to effectively The web site is an integral part of KeySpan’s overall vision reduce the unit cost of its investment in KEC. to become the premier energy and services company in the 5 An Interview with Wallace Parker, Jr., Executive Vice President – KeySpan Energy Delivery (New York and Long Island) Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Site Name: National Grid: Greenpoint Energy Center
    Greenpoint Energy Center Site This Upland Site Summary was authored by National Grid. The opinions, statements, and conclusions herein are solely those of National Grid. They are not adopted by and should not be attributed to any other Person. SITE NAME: NATIONAL GRID: GREENPOINT ENERGY CENTER Address: 287 Maspeth Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11211 Tax Lot Parcel(s): Brooklyn, Block 2837, Lot 1 Latitude: 40.720500 - 40° 43’ 5.30’’ Longitude: 73.931800 - 73° 55’ 51.24’’ Regulatory Programs/Numbers/Codes: NYSDEC Codes 224052, V00631, 610000X6OG - Division of Air Resources ID, (NYSDEC)00157 - Compliance Data System ID, (USEPA)NYD986871077 - Facility Index Database System ID, (USEPA)NYD006978795 - Resource Conservation Recovery Act ID , (USEPA) Plant ID 110002337784, Spill No. 9009058, 9111530, 9211562, 9301329, 9305107, 9606233, 9714234, 0004653, 0104143, 0106270, 0202908, 0303442, 0310061, 0413650, 0506134, 0908424, 0908872, 1006581, and 1012824. Analytical Data Status: Electronic Data Available Hardcopies Only No Data Available 1 SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN (COPCs) TRANSPORT PATHWAYS TO THE CREEK The current understanding of the transport mechanisms of contaminants from the upland portions of the Greenpoint Energy Center (Site) to Newtown Creek is summarized in this section and Table 1. Overland Transport: No specific evidence of overland transport was identified in the available site records. The pathway has not been evaluated for completeness but will be under investigation in the near future. Bank Erosion: A relieving platform (bulkhead) adjacent to Newtown Creek extends along the eastern part of the Site. No specific evidence of bank erosion was identified in the available Draft Upland Site Summary May 2012 Newtown Creek RI/FS 1 110782-01.01 Greenpoint Energy Center Site site records.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report
    Geotechnical Environmental Water Resources Ecological Final Remedial Investigation Report Fulton Municipal Works Former Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Site Brooklyn, New York Order on Consent Site No. 224051 Index No. A2-0552-0606 Submitted to: Submitted by: National Grid GEI Consultants, Inc. One MetroTech Center 455 Winding Brook Drive Brooklyn, NY 11201 Glastonbury, CT 06033 860-368-5300 July 2012 Project 093020-1-1110 _____________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP Vice President FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Qualified Environmental Professional’s Certification I, David B. Terry, certify that I am currently a Qualified Environmental Professional as defined in 6 NYCRR Part 375 and that this Report was prepared in accordance with applicable statues and regulations and in substantial conformance with the DER Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation (DER-10) and that all activities were performed in accordance with the DER-approved work plans and DER-approved work plan modifications as discussed in this Report. Date: July 6, 2012 _____________________________ David B. Terry, P.G., LEP GEI Consultants, Inc. i FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NATIONAL GRID FULTON MUNICIPAL WORKS FORMER MGP SITE JULY 2012 Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms viii Executive Summary xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Remedial Investigation Objectives and Scope 2 1.2 Site Description 5 1.2.1 Fulton MGP and RI Study Area History 5 1.2.1.1 Pre-MGP History 5 1.2.1.2 MGP History
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Basin Oil & Gas Play
    OIL AND GAS PLAYS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, SOUTHERN ONTARIO Terry Carter, Consulting Geologist London, Ontario 1 Ontario Petroleum Industries Oil and Natural Gas 1250 oil wells, 1200 gas wells, annual production 400,000 bo, 5.7 bcf natural gas, 100 different producers 5 wells/yr, 27,000 well records Hydrocarbon Storage in Geological Formations 270 bcf natural gas in 35 depleted reservoirs, 275 wells 22 million bbl refined petroleum products in 71 solution-mined caverns at Sarnia-Windsor area refineries/petrochemical plants – 95 wells Salt Solution Mining 250,000 tonnes/yr, 18 wells PLAY BY PLAY EXPLORING THE MICHIGAN BASIN 2 Industry Participants Oil & Gas Historically and presently exploration and production is dominated by small (mostly), Ontario-based operators History of periodic interest from large Calgary-based and international companies Small companies are low-cost, maintain operations through down-cycles, generate new plays, raise local capital Local companies have grown into large national and international corporations with long-term economic impact; Imperial Oil, Union Gas, and former McColl-Frontenac (Texaco Canada), British-American Oil Co. (Gulf Canada) and White Rose (purchased by Shell Canada) Hydrocarbon Storage Natural gas storage dominated by one large +billion$ company All cavern storage operations owned by large +billion$ petrochemical companies Salt solution mining Two operations owned by large corporations PLAY BY PLAY EXPLORING THE MICHIGAN BASIN 3 Ontario Oil and Gas History & Firsts • 1858 - first commercial oil well in North America at Oil Springs (and first oil spills) • 1866 – first salt solution mining well at Goderich • 1870 – first oil exports to U.S • 1873 – first export of technology – first Canadian drillers leave for Indonesia • 1889 - commercial gas production at Kingsville and Welland • 1890 – first export of natural gas to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn: Economic Development and the State of Its Economy
    Brooklyn: Economic Development And the State of Its Economy February 2004 New York State Office of the State Comptroller Alan G. Hevesi Office of the State Deputy Comptroller for the City of New York Kenneth B. Bleiwas, Deputy Comptroller Report 12-2004 Additional copies of this report may be obtained from: Office of the State Comptroller New York City Public Information Office 633 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 681-4824 Or through the Comptroller’s Web site at: www.osc.state.ny.us To help reduce printing costs, please notify the Office of the State Deputy Comptroller at (212) 383-3916 if you wish to have your name removed from our mailing list or if your address has changed. Contents I. Executive Summary..................................................................................................1 II. An Overview of the Brooklyn Economy .................................................................. 3 III. Economic Development in Brooklyn ...................................................................... 7 Major Issues Affecting Economic Development...............................................................................................................7 Waterfront Development and Zoning ................................................................................................................................8 Retail Expansion: Big Box Stores.....................................................................................................................................10 Tourism..........................................................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-Term Debt Issuing Companies
    National Grid US Operations – Credit Information Pack US Operations Long-term Debt Issuing Companies National Grid plc ■ National Grid’s US companies have several Moody’s / S&P / Fitch Baa1 / BBB+ / BBB+ rated issuing entities. The large number is for regulatory transparency. National Grid USA ■ The operating companies typically issue in USD Baa1 / BBB+ / - 144A or private placement format Niagara Mohawk Power KeySpan Corporation Corporation Baa1 / A - / BBB + ■ KeySpan Corporation is a legacy holding A2 / A - / - company that will not issue new debt Massachusetts Electric The Brooklyn Union Gas Company Company (KEDNY) ■ National Grid USA (NGUSA) has no long-term A3 / A - / - A2 / A - / A - debt but does have active commercial paper New England Power Company KeySpan Gas East Corporation programmes A3 / A - / - (KEDLI) A2 / A - / A - The Narragansett Electric Colonial Gas Company Company A3 / A - / - A3 / A - / - Boston Gas Company A3 / A - / - National Grid Generation LLC Baa1 / A - / - * Ratings shown are senior unsecured long-term ratings, or issuer/corporate ratings where there is no senior unsecured rating. Our US Operations Our Network ■ We both own and operate electricity transmission facilities across upstate New York, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont ■ We own and operate electricity distribution networks in upstate New York, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, serving approximately 3.4 million customers ■ We own and operate gas distribution networks across the northeastern US, located in upstate New York, New
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation Securities Litigation 01-CV-05852-Amended
    Case 1:01-cv-05852-ARR-MDG Document 64 Filed 04/07/2003 Page 1 of 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION CV 2001-5852 (ARR) (MDG) SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------X AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 1. Lead Plaintiffs Donald Kassan and Peter E. Hubbard (“Lead Plaintiffs”), for their amended complaint against defendants, allege the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included, inter alia, a review of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, press releases and other public statements issued by KeySpan Corporation (“KeySpan” or the “Company”), securities analysts' reports and advisories by or about the Company, media and third party reports about the Company, and a review of the case file and certain discovery in the litigation styled KeySpan Services Inc. et al. v. LeRoy Kay et al., Docket No. MON-C-95-01, pending in the Chancery Court Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County (the “Monmouth County litigation”). Lead Plaintiffs in good faith believe that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 2. This amendment addresses the deficiencies found by the Court in its Opinion and Order dated March 18, 2003. Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to appeal said Order. INTRODUCTION 3. This is a federal class action under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act” or “1934 Act”) on behalf of purchasers of KeySpan securities between March 24, 2000, and July 17, 2001 inclusive (the “Class Period”). As more fully set forth herein, the defendants have admitted that financial and operational improprieties had not been disclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments. in Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Royalties: from Hibernia to Hebron and Back
    Dalhousie Law Journal Volume 37 Issue 1 37:1 (2014) Special Issue: 4th East Coast Seminar of the Canadian Energy Law Article 3 Foundation 4-1-2014 Developments. in Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Royalties: From Hibernia to Hebron and Back R J. Thrasher Hoskin & Harcourt Simon Baines Hoskin & Harcourt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, and the Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons Recommended Citation R J. Thrasher and Simon Baines, "Developments. in Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Royalties: From Hibernia to Hebron and Back" (2014) 37:1 Dal LJ 33. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Law Journal by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. R.J. (Jack) Thrasher* and Developments in Newfoundland and Simon Baines* Labrador Offshore Royalties: From Hibernia to Hebron and Back This paper traces the historical development of the offshore oil and gas royalty regime for Newfoundland and Labrador, from the first negotiated private royalty agreement for the Hibernia project, through the application of both generic and project-specific regulatory schemes applicable to later projects, up to the Hibernia Southern Expansion. The variations in key provisions across the six major projects are reviewed, with regard to royalty structures, transportation cost eligibility, cost and production allocation, dispute settlement and legislative stability clauses. Finally, the prospect for application of innovations and solutions developed to date to future projects is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Independent System Operator: a Ten-Year Review
    The New York Independent System Operator: A Ten-Year Review Susan F. Tierney, Ph.D. Analysis Group Boston, Massachusetts April 12, 2010 This White Paper was prepared at the request of the New York Independent System Operator. The paper reflects the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of the NYISO, or its members. www.analysisgroup.com Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 BACKGROUND: The Goals Underlying Changes in New York’s Electric Industry in the 1990s ...................................... 7 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 New York’s Electric Industry Before the Establishment of NYISO .................................................................................... 9 Impetus for Change: The Pressure of High Electricity Prices ........................................................................................... 10 Planning for NYISO ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 Establishing NYISO ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keyspan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015
    KeySpan Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 KEYSPAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditor's Report………………………………...………………..…………………..…………………….………………………………………..3 Consolidated Statements of Income………………...…………………..……………..……………………………………………………………………………………………4 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income……………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows…………….……………………………………..…………………………………………………………………………………………6 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheets…………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………7 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Capitalization…………………………………………………..…….…………………………………………………………………………………9 March 31, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity ………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Years Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 1 - Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation………………………………….………………………………………………11 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies …………………………………………………………………………………………13 3 - Regulatory Assets and Liabilities ………………………..……………………...………………………………………………………22 4 - Rate Matters …………...……………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………24 5 - Property, Plant and Equipment …………………………………………………….……...………………………..………………………27 6 - Derivative Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • Gowanus Canal
    Public Health Assessment Final Release GOWANUS CANAL CITY OF NEW YORK BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORK EPA FACILITY ID: NYN000206222 Prepared by New York State Department of Health JANUARY 11, 2017 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 30-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Characterization Phase Iv Data Summary Report
    SITE CHARACTERIZATION PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT WORK ASSIGNMENT D004433-22 MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA KINGS (C), NY Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 625 Broadway, Albany, New York Alexander B. Grannis, Commissioner DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B URS Corporation 77 Goodell Street Buffalo, New York 14203 Final G3359U May 2009 PHASE IV DATA SUMMARY REPORT SITE CHARACTERIZATION MEEKER AVENUE PLUME TRACKDOWN SITE ID NO. 2-24-121 GREENPOINT/EAST WILLIAMSBURG INDUSTRIAL AREA BROOKLYN, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION REMEDIAL BUREAU B WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. D004433-22A PREPARED BY: URS CORPORATION 77 GOODELL STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 FINAL MAY 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Site Background ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Site Location and Description ............................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Previous Investigations.......................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Findings of Previous Phases of Site Investigation Fieldwork ............................ 1-7
    [Show full text]