ATONEMENT OF BLOOD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

Peter Tremayne | 368 pages | 27 Feb 2014 | Headline Publishing Group | 9780755377541 | English | London, United Kingdom Sacrifice and atonement in the | BibleProject™

He gave a substitionary atonement. The life of an innocent animal paid for the sins of guilty Adam and Eve. Only the Giver of Physical Life has the right to take life. Innocent blood would pay for the guilt and stain of sin. Abraham was instructed by God to offer Isaac as a sacrifice on Mt. Abraham built an altar, laid wood, bound Isaac and laid Isaac upon the wood Genesis God then provided a ram. It was not Abraham who found the animal to offer. It was God who provided the animal. This pointed to a future time when another Father God would offer up His Son to make atonement for the sins of all mankind. This time the sacrifice would not be stopped by God the Father. The practice of animal sacrifice was more clearly defined by God and practiced by the people of Israel beginning with the wilderness wanderings. God instructed the Jews to build a Tabernacle in which He would meet with His people. The book of Leviticus describes the sacrificial system and tells that animal sacrifice the shedding of blood was required for the atonement of their sins. So why did God send His Son to die for us? A sinless life had to be sacrificed for sinful life. Only a sinless human life would suffice. Animals do not sin. They live under the curse of sin, but it is man who is born with a sin nature and lives a sinful life. Jesus came to earth and took on a human body, with flesh, bone and blood! When He offered His life on the cross, He gave His sinless life for the sinful life of mankind. The atonement for sin could not have been done in any other way. They did not think of going to the Father who said he would provide everything they need. Instead, they attempted self- atonement. At first, they probably figured their fig leaf underpants would hold up under His scrutiny. Self- atonement never works. Sin is not conquered in the darkness of hiding—it grows. And because sin aims at destroying creation and dethroning the Creator it inevitably leads to brokenness. Nothing we craft can fix our sin problem. That solution to our sin problem is what the Bible calls atonement. Adam and Eve sewed for themselves loin-cloths out of figs to try to cover their nakedness. But what does work are the animal skins which God crafted into a covering for them. This is a picture of atonement. God makes a sacrifice to cover the sin and shame of humanity. Jon Akin says it well:. Though there is nothing explicitly stated in the text, this is an early indicator of what will take place in the sacrificial system. Animals will be sacrificed and their blood shed in the place of sinful man, culminating with the blood of the Messiah — the Lamb of God. From here. What is present in the sacrificial system is present in seed form in Genesis 3. These innocent animals served as substitutes. A substitute paid a price by blood which is accepted by God to restore the broken relationship. That is what we see all throughout the Old Testament in the sacrificial system. This can all seem a little barbaric to us. It sounds a bit like something we would read of the angry and tyrannical Roman gods who required sacrifices in order to appease whatever whim they had that day. Why does God require a goat to die in order for a person to live? Is the God of the Bible no different than the pagan gods we read about? I appreciate the way The Bible Project has answered this question:. The problem is, when we come to read about animal sacrifice in the Bible, we unfortunately assume that the same gods are at work. The result is a tragic irony. Our version goes like this:. God is holy and perfect. You are not. Therefore, God is angry at you, hates you even, and so he has to kill you. Our sin really has made a fraction between us and God. We have broken fellowship with God. The blood oaths in the ceremony were intended to protect the ritual's secrecy. In keeping with the idea that grievous must be answered with bloodshed and that should be voluntary, participants made an oath that rather than ever revealing the secret gestures of the ceremony, they would rather have "my throat The gory wording was removed early in the 20th century and changed to a less explicit reference to "different ways in which life may be taken. , the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement , was a strong proponent of , and favored execution methods that involved the shedding of blood as retribution for crimes of bloodshed. In , he or his scribe commented that the common execution method in Christian nations was , "instead of blood for blood according to the law of heaven. Smith , who argued against capital punishment, [29] Joseph Smith said that if he ever had the opportunity to enact a death law, he "was opposed to hanging" the convict; rather, he would "shoot him, or cut off his head, spill his blood on the ground, and let the smoke thereof ascend up to God. On January 27, , he spoke approvingly of Smith's toleration of "corrupt men" in Nauvoo who were guilty of and robbery, on the chance that they might repent and be baptized. In the Salt Lake valley, Young acted as the executive authority while the acted as a legislature. One of his main concerns in the early Mormon settlement was , and he swore that "a theif [sic] should not live in the Valley, for he would cut off their heads or be the means of having it done as the Lord lived. However, if a sealed and anointed person broke their covenants to any extent short of the unpardonable sin, they could possibly still gain their and become gods and goddesses aka, joint-heirs with Christ who inherits The Father has in the afterlife, conditional upon the utmost efforts possible being given to repentance, up to and possibly including forsaking one's life for forgiveness. The revelation did not, however, specify the mechanism by which such people would be "destroyed in the flesh," and it did not indicate whether that "redemption" would be the result of the sinner's own blood or the result of the atonement of Jesus. As far as scholars can tell, the author of the blood atonement doctrine was LDS Church president , who first taught the doctrine after the . Grant of the . Public talk of blood atonement diminished substantially by the end of the in when Young was replaced as territorial governor by Alfred Cumming. The subject of blood atonement remained largely dormant until the s, when the issue was revived by the national media during the John D. Lee trials for his role in the Mountain Meadows massacre. When Brigham Young led the Saints from Nauvoo, Illinois to the Salt Lake valley beginning in the mids, he and his followers intended to establish a independent of the United States , where there would be no distinction between church and state. For Mormon theocratic political theory, see . Brigham Young's first recorded teachings on the blood atonement doctrine were in , when Young had stepped into the shoes of Joseph Smith, the previous theocratic leader who had been killed in That year, he was said to have approved of a Mormon being killed by an unknown assailant in Nauvoo, Illinois , an act he characterized as "a deed of charity" because "he might now possibly be redeemed in the eternal world" Smith In the Salt Lake valley, Young maintained a Council of Fifty composed of religious leaders as a kind of legislature, but this body's power was limited Quinn , pp. In , as Young and the Council of Fifty were drafting a plan for a proposed , Young spoke to the Council about what to do with thieves, murderers, and adulterers, and said, "I want their cursed heads to be cut off that they may atone for their crimes". Two weeks later, Young recommended for the man and a fellow prisoner, but the Council decided to let them live. In a speech before the Territory 's legislature on February 5, , Young appeared to advocate the passage of a law that required decapitation for whites who were "condemned by the Law" for with black people Young He said that if a white Mormon "in an unguarded moment should commit such a transgression", decapitation "would do a great deal towards atoning for the sin He said, "It is the greatest blessing that could come to some men to shed their blood on the ground, and let it come up before the Lord as an atonement" Young During the Mormon Reformation , church leaders began to criss-cross Mormon communities in a dramatic call for greater orthodoxy and religious purity. Brigham Young , who was then a theocratic leader, began preparing church members for what they thought was the quickly-approaching , and a time of "Celestial law" in the . According to Young: "The time is coming when justice will be laid to the line and righteousness to the plummet; when we shall take the old broadsword and ask, Are you for God? And if you are not heartily on the Lord's side, you will be hewn down. The most vocal proponent of the blood atonement doctrine was Jedediah M. Grant , Young's second counselor in the First Presidency from to Grant, a firebrand preacher, rose to the First Presidency after the death of in and became the main force behind the Mormon Reformation Campbell , ch. His teachings in related to "covenant breakers," people who had broken their covenants made in the or . At a meeting in the Salt Lake Tabernacle on March 12, , Grant asked, "What disposition ought the people of God to make of covenant breakers? However, he lamented on the difficulty in applying this in a secular democracy, stating, "I wish we were in a situation favorable to our doing that which is justifiable before God, without any contaminating influences of Gentile amalgamation, laws, and traditions. We would not kill a man, of course, unless we killed him to save him. Parley P. Pratt , a prominent member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles , was also a proponent of the blood atonement doctrine. On December 31, , Pratt pressed the Utah Territory legislature to "[m]ake death the penalty for and adultery. Pratt stated, "This destruction of the flesh must have had reference to the death of the body; the man having justly forfeited his life in accordance with the law of God. On March 16, , Young acknowledged that it might seem, based on rhetoric from the pulpit, that "every one who did not walk to the line was at once going to be destroyed," but thus far, he said, nobody had been killed Young a , p. He warned them, however, that the time "is not far distant" when the LDS Church would enforce the law of blood atonement against covenant breakers Young a , p. One of the temple covenants at the time was, "I will never have anything to do with any of the daughters of Eve, unless they are given to me of the Lord. On January 11, Heber C. Kimball , a member of the First Presidency , spoke about the adulterers within the church and warned that "[t]hey are worthy of death, and they will get it. That time is near by, and God has spoken from the heavens, and when certain things are about right, we shall make a public example of those characters, Echoing Kimball's words, on February 8, , Young warned the church that institution of the "celestial law" requiring mandatory blood atonement was "nigh at hand," and that under this law, covenant breakers guilty of adultery would be "hewn down. In addition to talk about blood atonement as a theocratic form of capital punishment whose time was "nigh at hand," church leaders also discussed unofficial blood atonement. According to one interpretation of Brigham Young's sermon on March 16, , the sermon encouraged enforcement of the doctrine by individuals in certain situations. He said that if "you found your brother in bed with your wife, and put a javelin through both of them, you would be justified, and they would atone for their sins, and be received into the kingdom of God. At a meeting on September 21, attended by both Young and Grant, Grant stated that there were a great many covenant-breaking members in the church "who have committed sins that cannot be forgiven through baptism. For these sins, which Young did not specify, the shedding of blood is "the only condition for which they can obtain forgiveness," or to appease the wrath that is kindled against them, and that the law might have its course. On February 8, , Brigham Young stated that if a person "overtaken in a gross fault" truly understood that "by having his blood shed he will atone for that sin, and be saved and exalted with the Gods," he would voluntarily ask to have his blood shed so he could gain his exaltation Young , p. He framed blood atonement as an act of selfless love, and asked the congregation, "Will you love that man or woman well enough to shed their blood? Most discussion of blood atonement during the Mormon Reformation concerned the killing of "covenant breakers. Young's first discussion of blood atonement in concerned a man who may have been considered an apostate in Nauvoo, Illinois Smith On February 8, , Young said, regarding apostates, that "if their blood had been spilled, it would have been better for them. In August , Heber C. Kimball echoed Young's statements about apostates, stating that "if men turn traitors to God and His servants, their blood will surely be shed, or else they will be damned, and that too according to their covenants. Kimball , the extent of the religious enlightment of the apostates during the lifetime of Joseph Smith is not known, and they cannot be identified individually. Blood atonement as taught above was not to be used as a way to punish, but as a way for the sinner to make restitution for his sins. One hearsay account was given by John D. Lee, who was killed for his involvement in the Mountain Meadows massacre see below. Lee stated in his memoirs that he had heard of only one person who had properly received death by blood atonement - by willingly atoning for the :. Lee refused to be killed in the same manner for his conviction, requesting instead that he be executed by firing squad, rejecting the notion that he needed to atone for the Mountain Meadows massacre. Lee , who was later executed for his role in the killings. After escalating rumors that the emigrants participated in early Mormon persecution, the militia conducted a siege, and when the emigrants surrendered, the militia killed men, women, and children in cold blood, adopted some of the surviving children, and attempted a cover-up. Though widely connected with the blood atonement doctrine by the United States press and general public, there is no direct evidence that the massacre was related to "saving" the emigrants by the shedding of their blood as they had not entered into Mormon covenants ; rather, most commentators view it as an act of intended retribution. Young was accused of either directing the massacre, or of bearing complicity after the fact. However, when Brigham Young was interviewed on the matter and asked if he believed in blood atonement, he replied, "I do, and I believe that Lee has not half atoned for his great crime. Many of these rumors [ which? The operated as a vigilante group and took a central role in the events of the Mormon War. Although the organization ceased to formally exist in Missouri, the name "Danites" may have been used in both Nauvoo and Utah. During the s and s, there were widespread rumors that Brigham Young had a organization that was enforcing the blood atonement doctrine. Responding to this, Brigham Young stated on April 7, Is there war in our religion? No; neither war nor bloodshed. Yet our enemies cry out "bloodshed," and "oh, what dreadful men these Mormons are, and those Danites! The wicked slay the wicked, and they will lay it on the Saints. Disaffected Mormon Fanny Stenhouse , a Godbeite dissenter and prominent critic of Brigham Young, described the Danites as "Avenging Angels" who murdered disaffected Mormons and blamed their disappearance on Indians. An example used by some to illustrate the alleged practice of blood atonement is the murder of the former-slave, Thomas Coleman or Colburn , who was in good standing as a member of the LDS Church. As Mormon historian D. Michael Quinn has documented, Coleman was apparently secretly courting a white Mormon woman, contrary to both territorial law and contemporaneous Mormon teachings regarding people of African descent. At one of their clandestine meetings behind the old Arsenal on what is now Capitol Hill in Salt Lake on December 11, Coleman was discovered by "friends" of the woman. The group of vigilantes hit Coleman with a large rock. Using his own , his attackers slit his throat so deeply from ear to ear that he was nearly decapitated, as well as slicing open his right breast, in what some believe was a mimicry of penalties illustrated in the temple ritual. Not all of Coleman's wounds correlated with the temple ritual, however, since he was also castrated. The body was disposed of in less than three hours after its discovery. Less than twelve hours after that, Judge Elias Smith, first cousin of Joseph Smith, appointed George Stringham a Mormon ruffian and vigilante with ties to Porter Rockwell, Jason Luce, and William Hickman as the foreman of the Coroner's Jury; they briefly met and summarily dismissed the case as a crime that was committed by either a person or by persons unknown to the jury, abruptly ending all official enquiry into the bizarre murder. I wish to save life, and have no desire to destroy life. If I had my wish, I should entirely stop the shedding of human blood. What is Atonement and Why Is it Necessary? Biblical Meaning

McConkie, Bruce R. Salt Lake City, Penrose, Charles W. Peterson, Paul H. Smith, Joseph Fielding. From The Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Jump to: navigation , search. Author: Snow, Lowell M. Bibliography McConkie, Bruce R. Category : B. Navigation menu Personal tools Log in. Namespaces Page Discussion. They were making sacrifices "outside the camp" and "in the open field" 3, 5. In essence, they were practicing idolatry, which is equivalent to adultery. The end goal of God's design concerning sacrifices was to mark out his people as his and no one else's: "so they shall no more sacrifice their sacrifices to goat demons, after whom they whore" 7. And the end result of overturning God's design was terrifying, namely, "that man shall be cut off from among his people" 4. Of course modern people do not "whore" after goat demons. But we are no less idolatrous and adulterous in our attempts to cover our bases with the "gods" of our own age. We pour ourselves into our work in hopes that title, position, and wealth will give us that "made right" experience. We look to relationships romantic or otherwise to assure ourselves that we are desired and needed—that we fit in the world. We seek comfort and rest in any number of cultural commodities food, drink, media, etc. In short, we give ourselves away to many "gods" in our search for atonement. What is God's one true response to our idolatrous and adulterous attempts to be made right apart from him? While we might expect to be "cut off" 9 , in the most amazing narrative turn imaginable, God himself enters our world in the person of Jesus Christ to accomplish atonement on our behalf—to put us in a "made-right" relationship with himself. He takes our blood guiltiness upon himself and, on the cross, experiences the cutting off that we deserved. In Jesus, the one true God gives himself up as the one true sacrifice in our place. He accomplishes atonement on our behalf, overcoming our idolatrous and syncretistic tendencies in order to bind us to himself. The only natural response, then, is to put away idolatry and adultery—to put our trust in the one true God's work for us. Because in Christ, reconciliation, "made-rightness," and atonement are ours to be experienced and cherished-our searching is over. We are now free to give ourselves over to God with a single-minded, pure hearted devotion. Support the work of CT. Subscribe and get one year free. The views of the blogger do not necessarily reflect those of Christianity Today. Most Recent October 21 Ed Stetzer. SHARE tweet email print. Stephen Um elaborates on Leviticus 17 to kick off a new blog series on the atonement. Ed Stetzer Bio. The Exchange Weekly The Exchange newsletter is a weekly digest of coverage, research, and perspective from Ed Stetzer. Email Address. Subscribe to the selected newsletters. Get weekly updates from The Exchange delivered to your inbox. Current Issue November Subscribe. Read This Issue. Reply on Twitter. Tags: Atonement Bible Jesus. Posted: March 11 , The Atonement and the Blood: Leviticus 17 by Dr. More from The Exchange Trending. September 29, Culture. A brief introduction to the charismatic Catholics and People of Praise, in the news now due to Amy Coney Barrett's nomination. September 17, Interviews. Atonement Through the Blood of Jesus

Speaking on this problem, Isaiah talked of a king who would come as a servant and die on behalf of the Israelites, giving his life to atone for their sins. The king that Isaiah prophesied about was Jesus. All over the New Testament, we hear how the death of Jesus was an atonement for our sins, covering the debt that humans owe God for contributing to all the evil and death in the world. The New Testament also talks about the atonement of Jesus Christ as a purification. Like the blood of the animal sacrifices, it is now Christ's blood that washes away all of the damage and side-effects of sin, purifying and sanctifying the world. The story doesn't end there, though. Because Jesus was able to conquer death and rise from the dead, Christ made Himself the perfect sacrifice who now continually offers Himself to anyone who needs Him. Because Christ became the perfect sacrifice, the ritual of animal sacrifice was no longer required. Like Jesus, who was lowered down into the grave and rose again anew, Christians are lowered down into the water and rise up out of it a new person. In this way, baptism connects us with the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. The second ritual that Christ instituted is the Lord's supper, a reenactment of Jesus's last supper, which allows Christians to remember the sacrifice that Jesus made on their behalf. Thanks to atonement in Christianity and the rituals that connect us to it, we are able to have our debts forgiven and walk in newness with God. Receive Weekly Bible Study Emails -. Word Study. Old Testament. New Testament. Showcasing different biblical books and our How to Read the Bible series. Trace key biblical themes through the entire narrative of the Bible. Explore key biblical words in both Hebrew and Greek. Videos and overviews for every book of the Old Testament. Videos and overviews for every book of the New Testament. Series Showcasing different biblical books and our How to Read the Bible series. Themes Trace key biblical themes through the entire narrative of the Bible. Word Study Explore key biblical words in both Hebrew and Greek. Old Testament Videos and overviews for every book of the Old Testament. New Testament Videos and overviews for every book of the New Testament. Explore Resources. Contact BibleProject. Bible Reader. Video Details. To understand sacrifice, we must understand evil. Though Old Testament atonement was a temporary solution for evil, evil still persisted no matter how many sacrifices were made. This was an imperfect sacrifice that Christ would later replace. Continue Your Learning Journey. Videos Blogs Podcasts Books Classes. Related Videos. Torah Series. The first installment of our series on the atonement comes from Dr. Stephen Um. This week, Dr. Um shares his thoughts on Leviticus 17 and its relationship to the atonement. While the language of "atonement" has begun to fall out of regular use in our day and age, atonement itself remains as central to the human experience as it has ever been. In most cases, the word "atonement" has been replaced by the word "reconciliation. In the post-Christian West this longing for "made-rightness" typically expresses itself in one of two ways. On the one hand, many engage in adjusting themselves to the world in which they live. So, for instance, I can be made right with the world I live in by adjusting my language, style, and culture to better fit the world around me. This kind of adaptation to cultural expectation carries with it an implicit recognition that there is something "wrong" with me that must be adjusted if I am to be reconciled to the world in which I live. I must locate the problem within me and seek to make the necessary changes to solve the problem. On the other hand, many engage in adjusting the world to themselves. Here, the world must be changed if it is to be aligned with who I am as an individual. In this scenario, there is still something "wrong" that must be made right, but it is located outside of me. In the end, it doesn't matter which approach we take, we all long to experience "made-rightness" and reconciliation. In a word, we all crave atonement. To modern readers, the kind of atonement that we find in the Old Testament book of Leviticus seems archaic and antiquated. We don't know what to do with things like blood sacrifice and statutes regarding the proper location for such sacrifices. Leviticus 17 presents us with a seemingly strange world. But an honest reading of the text leads to a recognition that the Israelites were a people not unlike ourselves. Like us, they used every culturally acceptable practice at their disposal to experience "made-rightness" and reconciliation. This was the situation: in a culture where blood sacrifice was understood as one of the primary means of dealing with the out of sync nature of the world and one's own individual fallenness both of which were the result of sin , God had given the Israelites the sacrificial system as a means of being reconciled to him. They were to make sacrifices as "a gift to the Lord," and they were to do so "in front of the tabernacle of the Lord" These were to be "peace offerings to the Lord" 5 which he would receive as a "pleasing aroma" 6. When the Israelites made their sacrifices in one place to the one true God , they would be reconciled—they would experience the "made-rightness" of atonement. This was God's design: "the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life" But rather than sacrificing to one God in one place in accordance with his design, the Israelites demonstrated their lack of faith by sacrificing to many "gods" in many places. Rather than placing all of their trust in the God who had delivered them from Egypt, they attempted to cover their bases with the gods of other nations as well. They were making sacrifices "outside the camp" and "in the open field" 3, 5. In essence, they were practicing idolatry, which is equivalent to adultery. The end goal of God's design concerning sacrifices was to mark out his people as his and no one else's: "so they shall no more sacrifice their sacrifices to goat demons, after whom they whore" 7. And the end result of overturning God's design was terrifying, namely, "that man shall be cut off from among his people" 4. Of course modern people do not "whore" after goat demons. But we are no less idolatrous and adulterous in our attempts to cover our bases with the "gods" of our own age. We pour ourselves into our work in hopes that title, position, and wealth will give us that "made right" experience. We look to relationships romantic or otherwise to assure ourselves that we are desired and needed—that we fit in the world. We seek comfort and rest in any number of cultural commodities food, drink, media, etc. In short, we give ourselves away to many "gods" in our search for atonement. What is God's one true response to our idolatrous and adulterous attempts to be made right apart from him?

Blood Atonement - The Encyclopedia of Mormonism

Several early Church leaders, most notably Brigham Young, taught that in a complete theocracy the Lord could require the voluntary shedding of a murderer's blood-presumably by capital punishment-as part of the process of Atonement for such grievous sin. This was referred to as "blood Atonement. This view is not a doctrine of the Church and has never been practiced by the Church at any time. Early anti-Mormon writers charged that under Brigham Young the Church practiced "blood Atonement," by which they meant Church-instigated violence directed at dissenters, enemies, and strangers. This claim distorted the whole idea of blood atonement-which was based on voluntary submission by an offender-into a supposed justification of involuntary punishment. Occasional isolated acts of violence that occurred in areas where Latter-day Saints lived were typical of that period in the history of the American West, but they were not instances of Church-sanctioned blood Atonement. McConkie, Bruce R. Salt Lake City, Penrose, Charles W. Peterson, Paul H. Smith, Joseph Fielding. From The Encyclopedia of Mormonism. God then provided a ram. It was not Abraham who found the animal to offer. It was God who provided the animal. This pointed to a future time when another Father God would offer up His Son Jesus to make atonement for the sins of all mankind. This time the sacrifice would not be stopped by God the Father. The practice of animal sacrifice was more clearly defined by God and practiced by the people of Israel beginning with the wilderness wanderings. God instructed the Jews to build a Tabernacle in which He would meet with His people. The book of Leviticus describes the sacrificial system and tells that animal sacrifice the shedding of blood was required for the atonement of their sins. So why did God send His Son to die for us? A sinless life had to be sacrificed for sinful life. Only a sinless human life would suffice. Animals do not sin. They live under the curse of sin, but it is man who is born with a sin nature and lives a sinful life. Jesus came to earth and took on a human body, with flesh, bone and blood! When He offered His life on the cross, He gave His sinless life for the sinful life of mankind. The atonement for sin could not have been done in any other way. It had to be by blood atonement. God knew what He was doing when He created man. He created man for His pleasure and for His glory Revelation , Isaiah and yet He knew that man would sin. Bearing shame and scoffing rude, In my place condemned He stood; Sealed my pardon with His blood. What a Savior! Our ministry outreach has grown significantly and we need your help to continue. How was Jesus Like a Worm? A nd were they kings? The Names of Jehovah hidden in Psalm 23! This will surprise you! Why is Dan Missing? Yes, send me answers to interesting and challenging questions about Jesus and the Bible. Live empowered with love! Genesis Abraham was instructed by God to offer Isaac as a sacrifice on Mt. God provided this ram a lamb that had reached maturity as a substitutionary atonement. No Other Way The atonement for sin could not have been done in any other way. Philip P. Subscribe to Receive Articles.

https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/b2740933-e0ba-47a5-a64e-6586b37b1e88/diat-fur-dummies-368.pdf https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/5b357782-a97c-48ec-b1b5-e218cf753073/klinische-diagnostik-innerer-krankheiten-mittels- bakteriologischer-chemischer-und-mikroskopischer-u-286.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9587952/UploadedFiles/33CAD8C8-B03E-86B4-8DEE-F1ABCA770AD2.pdf https://static.s123-cdn-static.com/uploads/4645729/normal_601f8dadedf99.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9591643/UploadedFiles/689A2DA8-CB85-8B1B-1991-8F4EDC4A257B.pdf