DOCSLIB.ORG

Yellowtail Dam and Reservoir Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yellowtail Dam and Reservoir Brochure River About Yellowtail Recreation Afterbay Yellowtail Dam and Afterbay Dam 313 Bighorn Bighorn Lake is 71 miles long and is a Yellowtail Dam & Visitor Center Reservoir Dam deep blue-water fishery created by Ok-A-Beh Type.............................................. Concrete arch Yellowtail Dam. Over 190 miles of Fort Smith (feet) Park Height above foundation ........................ 525 shoreline showcase colorful geology and HQ Crest length (feet)......................................... 1,480 an area rich in history and tradition. Much ake Crest width (feet)............................................... 22 of the reservoir’s length is within the L Crest elevation (feet).................................... 3,660 n Bighorn Canyon where wildlife is r o Base thickness at center (feet)............... about 145 h abundant and the scenery is spectacular. ig Volume (cubic yards)...............................1,546,000 B Spillway: A32 foot diameter tunnel The Afterbay Lake belowReservation the reservoir Boundary is in the left abutment controlled by a good spot for trout fishing. Flows in two radial gates 25 feet wide by Bighorn River below the Afterbay Dam 64.4 feet high. The spillway are clear and cold. This has allowed the capacity in cubic feet per river to become a world class trout fishing BIGHORN CANYON Crow second (cfs) at elevation 3,660.............. 92,000 area. NATIONAL River Outlet: Two 84 inch diameter is located on the RECREATION AREA Indian Yellowtail Dam conduits controlled by ring-follower The Bighorn Canyon National Bighorn River at the mouth of Bighorn gates with a capacity (in cfs) of................. 5,000 Recreation Area (NRA) Reservation Canyon about 43 air miles from Billings, Power outlets: Four 12 foot diameter surrounds the reservoir and Montana. When full, the reservoir penstocks through the dam. afterbay and is managed by Barry’s Landing extends 71 miles south into Wyoming. the National Park Service. Reservoir (Bighorn Lake) North The dam and reservoir provide multiple The NRA was dedicated in benefits to the American public including Capacity (acre-feet at elevation 3,657)...... 1,375,000 October 1968 three years 0 5 Miles 10 Area (acres at elevation 3,657)...................... 17,300 power generation, flood control, irrigation, after the dam was completed. Devil Canyon Overlook municipal and industrial water, fish and Length (river miles at elevation 3,657)....................71 Offices and Visitor Centers Water surface elevations (in feet): are in Fort Smith, Montana, MONTANA wildlife benefits and recreation. The Joint-use storage....................... 3,614 to 3,640 facility is operated by: and Lovell, Wyoming. WYOMING Flood control storage.................3,640 to 3,657 Bureau of Reclamation Horseshoe Bend Additional recreation Symbol Key Montana Area Office Powerplant information is available at: Four vertical shaft generators P.O. Box 30137 Wheelchair accessible connected to Francis type turbines. Billings, MT 59107-0137 http://www.rec.gov or (406) 247-7295 Total nameplate capacity (kilowatts).......... 250,000 http://www.nps.gov/bica. Ranger station Capacity each generator (kilowatts)............ 62,500 Capacity each turbine (horsepower)............ 87,500 Boat Ramp 37 Afterbay Dam: Marina Type: Composite concrete gravity with embankment wings Shoshone River Height above foundation (feet)................. about 40 Swimming area - lifeguards Crest length (feet)......................................... 1,360 Lovell Picnic area Crest width (in feet for embankment section).......... 28 14A Crest elevation (feet).................................... 3,197 Campground Outlet works: Five radial gates and three Reservoir elevation, river flows and boat sluice gates control flows to the river launch information is available at Snack Bar with a total capacity (in cfs)..................... 24,500 http://www.usbr.gov/gp by clicking on the Two sluce gates control flow to the links for recreation or lakes and reservoirs BIAcanal with a capacity (cfs)..................... 750 on the left side of the page. River publication last revised 4/14/2008 Bighorn The Yellowtail Unit Electricity Water of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Yellowtail Powerplant is located at the Basin Program downstream toe of Yellowtail Dam and covers Water has many uses at the Yellowtail Unit. nearly all the width of the river. Four Each use provides benefits to the American public and is consistent with state law, the Most of the water and power facilities in the generating units are operated independantly to provide power for homes and businesses. terms and conditions of the Yellowstone River Missouri River Basin were constructed under Compact and contemporary environmental the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Pick- law. Sloan), authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944. Pick-Sloan is one of the most extensive Hydropower is perhaps the most important plans ever developed for management of an use of water at Yellowtail. Low cost electricity entire river basin. is provided to the region and the water is available for other uses after it flows through To maintain safety and reliability, Reclamation Pick-Sloan brought together a flood control the turbines and returns to the Bighorn River. constantly evaluates facility needs. Scheduled and navigation plan developed by the Army maintenance often requires a unit to be taken Corps of Engineers and an irrigation and Flood control is another major benefit from apart. Coordinating such work with users and hydroelectric plan prepared by the Bureau of the dam. Yellowtail is operated with other other powerplants is essential for meeting Reclamation. Together they became a facilities in the Bighorn and greater Missouri demand for power. comprehensive approach to multiple-purpose River basins to reduce damage caused by benefits in the basin. Today benefits include flooding. Yellowtail is credited with over $113 Shown in the photo above is one of Yellowtail irrigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, million in savings from 1965 through 2007. Powerplant’s four turbine runners which has navigation, recreation, sediment abatement, been refurbished and is ready to be Fish and wildlife have benefitted from the fish and wildlife enhancement and municipal reinstalled. At left is a Reclamation employee development of special management areas and industrial water. directing the lifting of one of the generator around the reservoir that preserve habitat for rotors for maintenance. waterfowl, upland birds and other animals. The dam transformed the Bighorn River between Fort Smith and the Yellowstone River into an internationally recognized blue-ribbon The Afterbay Dam trout fishery. The reservoir is home to brown and rainbow trout, walleye, sauger and other Hydropower is uniquely capable of quickly species. The Afterbay is also a trout fishery. generating electricity when demand rises and conserving energy when it is not needed. Recreation is one of the most visible uses This “peaking power” ability is enhanced when of water for visitors to Yellowtail. The Bighorn the widely varying flows do not adversely Canyon National Recreation Area was impact those who live downstream. Yellowtail created to provide recreation opportunities provides peaking power for a part of each day around the reservoir for the American public. and the Afterbay Dam continuously regulates The prime contract for construction of the dam the flows. Municipal and Industrial water use is was awarded in April 1961, and the last one of the authorized purposes of the The widely varying releases from the bucket of concrete was placed in the dam Yellowtail’s annual power generation over the Yellowtail Unit as with many Pick-Sloan powerplant are regulated by the Yellowtail during October 1965. The construction of the last 10 years has averaged nearly a million facilities. Afterbay Dam located 2.2 miles downstream. powerplant began with the dam and was kilowatt-hours. That is enough electrical The afterbay, with a capacity of 3140 acre- Irrigation water is released into the completed in December 1967 when the last unit energy to supply about 80,000 homes. The feet, minimizes downstream fluctuations in the Bighorn Canal to satisfy senior water rights was placed in service. Yellowtail Afterbay Dam power is marketed to utilities and electric Bighorn River by temporarily storing peak was started in April 1964 and was completed in cooperatives throughout the west by the for the Crow Indian Irrigation Project and discharges from the powerplant. November 1966. Western Area Power Administration. other irrigators. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yellowtail Dam and Bighorn Lake Long Term Issues
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Long Term Issues Group Boysen Buffalo Bill Bull Lake YELLOWTAIL DAM, BIGHORN LAKE and AFTERBAY Yellowtail Afterbay Dam Substation Visitor Center Yellowtail Dam YELLOWTAIL DAM, BIGHORN LAKE AND AFTERBAY Yellowtail Unit • Authorization: Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 (ch.665 Stat. 887) Senate Document 191—USACE/Reclamation plan for Missouri River Basin Development • Project Purposes – Flood Control – Hydropower – Irrigation – Recreation – Fish & Wildlife – Sediment storage Yellowtail Unit Project Purposes- Flood Control (Exclusive flood storage = 259K af), Coordinated with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Authorization: Public Law 89-664, October 15, 1966 Purpose “In order to provide for public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of the proposed Yellowtail Reservoir and lands adjacent thereto in the States of Wyoming and Montana by the people of the United States….” BIGHORN RESERVOIR ALLOCATIONS Dam Crest Maximum Water Surface or Top of Surcharge Elev. 3660.00 (1,381,189 Acre-Feet) Elev. 3660.0 SURCHARGE - 52,829 Acre-Feet Top of Exclusive Flood Elev. 3657.00 (1,328,360 AF) EXCLUSIVE FLOOD CONTROL - 258,331 Acre-Feet Top of Joint Use Elev. 3640.00 (1,070,029 Acre-Feet) JOINT USE - 240,342 Acre-Feet Top of Active Conservation Elev. 3614.00 (829,687 Acre-Feet) Spillway crest Elev. 3593.00 ACTIVE CONSERVATION - 336,103 Acre-Feet FISH WILDLIFE RECREATION AGRICULTURE POWER MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL Top of Inactive Elev. 3547.00 (493,584 Acre-Feet) Powerplant Penstock Elev. 3450.00 INACTIVE CONSERVATION - 477,576 Acre-Feet Irrigation Outlet Elev. 3400.00 River Outlet Elev.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data Natural Resource Data Series NPS/GRYN/NRDS—2013/482 ON THE COVER Field activities in Layout Creek, Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Photograph courtesy of NPS Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data Natural Resource Data Series NPS/GRYN/NRDS—2013/482 Authors Andrew Ray Greater Yellowstone Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service 2327 University Way, Suite 2 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Katie Kleehammer W. Adam Sigler Montana State University Water Quality Extension Land Resources and Environmental Sciences P.O. Box 173120 Bozeman, MT 59717-3120 Editor Nina Chambers Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative P.O. Box 2705 Jackson, WY 83001 May 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation on the Crow Reservation / Tribal and Community Benefits of The
    Irrigation on the Crow Reservation / tribal and community benefits of the proposed Hardin Unit, Big Horn County, Montana by Raymond Eugene Borton A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Agricultural Economics Montana State University © Copyright by Raymond Eugene Borton (1964) Abstract: Irrigation on the Crow reservation is a complex problem involving groups and institutions as well as economic considerations. This thesis shows the background and current status of the problems which must be considered in making development decisions and plans for the Hardin Unit, This 42,600 acre project is to be made possible by the Yellowtail Dam, now under construction. Tribal benefits from the Hardin Unit depend on the solution of complex heirship problems and Indian administration policies. Development and operation of irrigated land by Indians would require extensive changes in education, credit, employment and attitudes. The indirect benefits to be gained by the Hardin community are considered, Business expansion through farm and non-farm population is the basis for measurement. The benefits are compared to the indirect costs including income foregone and social expenses. This investigation prompts the following recommendations: (1) Land ownership may be simplified through an expanded tribal purchase program and by revision and passage of the Church Bill in Congress. BIA. policies on limitations to heirship status and formation of Indian land enterprises plus
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis and Clark: the Unheard Voices
    Curriculum Connections A free online publication for K-12 educators provided by ADL’s A World of Difference® Institute. www.adl.org/lesson-plans © 1993 by George Littlechild UPDATED 2019 Lewis and Clark: The Unheard Voices CURRICULUM CONNECTIONS | UPDATED FALL 2019 2 In This Issue The disadvantage of [people] not knowing the past is that they do Contents not know the present. History is a hill or high point of vantage, from which alone [they] see the town in which they live or the age Alignment of Lessons to Common —G. K. Chesterson, author (1874–1936) in which they are living. Core Anchor Standards Each year classrooms across the U.S. study, re-enact, and celebrate the Lewis and Clark expedition, a journey that has become an emblematic symbol of Lessons American fortitude and courage. While there are many aspects of the “Corps of Elementary School Lesson Discovery” worthy of commemoration—the triumph over geographical obstacles, the appreciation and cataloging of nature, and the epic proportions Middle School Lesson of the journey—this is only part of the history. High School Lesson While Lewis and Clark regarded the West as territory “on which the foot of civilized man had never trodden,” this land had been home for centuries to Resources millions of Native Americans from over 170 nations. For the descendants of Tribal Nations Whose Homeland these people, celebrations of the Corps of Discovery mark the onset of an era Lewis and Clark Explored of brutal repression, genocide and the destruction of their culture. Resources for Educators and Students The lesson plans in this issue of Curriculum Connections take an in-depth look at the history of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone River - Cumulative Effects Analysis
    Yellowstone River - Cumulative Effects Analysis Project Objectives 1. Evaluate the cumulative hydraulic, biological, and socioeconomic impacts of human activity on the Yellowstone River. 2. Develop recommended management practices and position statements. Project Extent • Gardiner MT to the Missouri River confluence (565 River Miles) Yellowstone River Cumulative Effects Assessment Montana’s Involvement • Yellowstone River Conservation District Council (YRCDC) • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) • 2004 Cost-Share Agreement with Corps of Engineers • YRCDC – Local Leadership and Participation Primary Project Components • Hydrology • Avian • Hydraulics - Floodplain • Fisheries • Channel Geomorphology • Land Use Trends • Riparian • Socioeconomics • Wetlands • Lidar Topographic Mapping • Water Quality • Cumulative Effects Analysis Hydrology A Comparison of Pre-Development and Modern Stream Flows Main Results: • Natural streamflows have been affected by human development. • Primary influences are flow alterations on the Bighorn River and irrigation withdrawals. • The Yellowstone River has responded to these flow alterations. Bighorn River Watershed 22,885 square miles (33%) of total Yellowstone River watershed Yellowtail Dam/ Bighorn Reservoir Buffalo Bill Reservoir Boysen Reservoir Bighorn River Flow Alterations Yellowtail Dam: Built mid-1960s • 1,331,725 acre-feet of storage in Bighorn Reservoir • Flood control targets including preventing flows at the confluence of the Yellowstone River from exceeding 25,000
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming
    Environmental and Recreational Water Use Analysis for the Wind – Bighorn River Basin, Wyoming Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update Prepared for: Wyoming Water Development Commission 6920 Yellowstone Rd Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009 Prepared by: Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th St., Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 September 7, 2017 Draft Pre-Decisional Document - Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Wind – Bighorn River Basin Plan Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2010, the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WWDC) requested a study to develop more robust and consistent methods for defining environmental and recreational (E&R) water uses for the River Basin Planning program. The study outlined that recreational and environmental uses needed to be identified and mapped, in a way that would assess their interactions with traditional water uses throughout the state of Wyoming. Harvey Economics completed the study in 2012, with a report and handbook being produced to identify a consistent viewpoint and accounting process for E&R water demands and to help guide river basin planning efforts in moving forward. The methods developed in the handbook were implemented on the Wind-Bighorn River Basin (Basin), and the results of the Basin plan update are provided in this report. In addition to the handbook guidelines, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. coordinated with the WWDC to further the analysis through the development of three models: 1) protection, 2) environmental, and 3) recreation. The Basin is located in central and northwestern Wyoming. Approximately 80% of Yellowstone National Park (YNP) is included in the Basin. Elevations in the Basin are variable as the Wind River and Bighorn Mountains funnel water from alpine areas to lower river corridors.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversified Yellowtail Farm & Ranch
    Diversified Yellowtail Farm & Ranch 0 Highway 313, Hardin, MT $2,900,000 Presented Exclusively by Zach McKinley, Realtor 406-622-3224 office 406-799-2664 cell [email protected] 612 Painted Robe Rd, Lavina, MT 59046 CorderandAssociates.com Property Information Total Acres: 5,642.62 (1,833.62 Deeded & 3,809 Leased) Acres: 1,833.62 Deeded (597.502 Irrigated/ 1,159.31 Grazing/72.808 Dry-land tillable/4 Homesite) Leased Acres: 3,809 leased acres. The sellers are willing to assist a new buyer in transferring all eligible leases Legal Description: Request from listing agent Taxes: $10,635.75 (property)/$18,597.60 (irrigation fee) Elevation: 3,000’ Mineral Rights: Seller owns 1/2 of the mineral rights on most of the deeded acres Water Rights: Yes Water: 1,680’ Artisan well (80 GPM) with waterline that feeds tanks in pasture/2 reservoirs Fort Benton Farm Structures:Chouteau County,2 Homes, Montana, working 1280.0 AC corrals, +/- 30’ x 60’ shop, grain bins, 1500’ feed lot with concrete base to support 800 calves/2 Quonset huts Executive Summary Everything is big out here in Montana—the majestic mountains, the blue Big Sky, the whopping wildlife, and the vast cultivated fields. Montana is a special place in that its economy in agriculture feeds the people of the world and its scenic and recreating opportunities entertains them. It is an incredible feeling to watch a steady stream of semitrailers navigating the back roads of Big Horn County to the piles of sugar beets for collection. Consider this rare opportunity to own a well-established and turn-key farm and ranch located near Hardin, Montana in Big Horn County.
    [Show full text]
  • OUT HERE, WE HAVE a STORY to TELL. This Map Will Lead You on a Historic Journey Following the Movements of Lt
    OUT HERE, WE HAVE A STORY TO TELL. This map will lead you on a historic journey following the movements of Lt. Col. Custer and the 7th Calvary during the days, weeks and months leading up to, and immediately following, the renowned Battle of Little Bighorn were filled with skirmishes, political maneuvering and emotional intensity – for both sides. Despite their resounding victory, the Plains Indians’ way of life was drastically, immediately and forever changed. Glendive Stories of great heroism and reticent defeat continue to reverberate through MAKOSHIKA STATE PARK 253 the generations. Yet the mystique remains today. We invite you to follow the Wibaux Trail to The Little Bighorn, to stand where the warriors and the soldiers stood, 94 to feel the prairie sun on your face and to hear their stories in the wind. 34 Miles to Theodore Terry Roosevelt Fallon National Park 87 12 Melstone Ingomar 94 PIROGUE Ismay ISLAND 12 12 Plevna Harlowton 1 Miles City Baker Roundup 12 89 12 59 191 Hysham 12 4 10 2 12 14 13 11 9 3 94 Rosebud Lavina Forsyth 15 332 447 16 R MEDICINE E ER 39 IV ROCKS IV R R 5 E NE U STATE PARK Broadview 87 STO 17 G OW Custer ON L T NORTH DAKOTA YE L 94 6 59 Ekalaka CUSTER GALLATIN NF 18 7 332 R E 191 IV LAKE Colstrip R MONTANA 19 Huntley R 89 Big Timber ELMO E D Billings W 447 O 90 384 8 P CUSTER Reed Point GALLATIN Bozeman Laurel PICTOGRAPH Little Bighorn Battlefield NATIONAL 90 CAVES Hardin 20 447 FOREST Columbus National Monument Ashland Crow 212 Olive Livingston 90 Lame Deer WA Agency RRIO SOUTH DAKOTA R TRA 212 IL 313 Busby
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations
    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Management Policies
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Fire Management Plan Requirement ...................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Collaborative Planning Process .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Federal Policy Implementation ............................................................................................................... 3 1.4 NEPA/NHPA Planning Requirements ................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Fire Management Plan Authorities ......................................................................................................... 3 2 RELATIONSHIP TO LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND FIRE POLICY ...................................... 5 2.1 NPS Management Policies ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Enabling Legislation and Purpose of NPS Unit ..................................................................................... 5 2.3 General Management Plan ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Resource Management Plan ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]