DOCSLIB.ORG

GENETICS, TAXONOM B. Sc. I YEAR NETICS, TAXONOMY & EVOLUTIO EVOLUTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GENETICS, TAXONOM B. Sc. I YEAR NETICS, TAXONOMY & EVOLUTIO EVOLUTION BSC ZO- 103 B. Sc. I YEAR GENETICS, TAXONOMY & EVOLUTION DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Board of Studies and Programme Coordinator Board of Studies Prof. B.D.Joshi Prof. H.C.S.Bisht Retd.Prof. Department of Zoology Department of Zoology DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Gurukul Kangri University Nainital Haridwar Prof. H.C.Tiwari Dr.N.N.Pandey Retd. Prof. & Principal Principal Scientist, Department of Zoology, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries MB Govt.PG College Research (ICAR) Haldwani Nainital. Bhimtal (Nainital). Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Programme Coordinator Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit writing and Editing Editor Writer Dr.S.N Bahuguna Dr.H.C.S.Bisht Professor & Head Professor Department of Zoology & Biotechnology Department of Zoology HNB Garhwal( A Central University) DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, P.B.No.70,Srinagar,Garhwal(246174) Uttarakhand (India). Dr.Dharmendra K.Rathor Assistant Professor Department of Zoology Govt. PG College Lohaghat (Uttarakhand) Course Title and Code : Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution (BS CZO 103 ) ISBN : 978-93-85740-55-8 Copyright : Uttarakhand Open University Edition : 2017 Published By : Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital- 263139 ss BSCZO-103 Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Phone No. 05946-261122, 261123 Toll free No. 18001804025 Fax No. 05946-264232, E. mail [email protected] htpp://uou.ac.in Contents Course 3: Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution Course code: BSCZO103 Credit: 3 Unit Block and Unit title Page number number Block 1 Genetics 1-91 1 Mendalism and Elements of heredity : Elements of heredity and variation, 1-31 Mendel’s principles of heredity, linkage (Coupling and repulsion), crossing-over (mechanism, theories and importance). Chromosomal mapping (Three point cross). 2 Chromosomal Mutation : Classification, Translocation, Inversion, Deletion, 32-51 Duplication, Euploidy, Aneuploidy and Polysomy. 3 Genetic interaction : Gene structure and function. 52 -68 4 69-91 Human genetics : Recessive inherited disorder, dominant inherited disorder, inborn errors. BLOCK 2 Taxonomic concept : 92-158 5 92-108 Taxonomy and Systematics: Introduction to taxonomy and its relationship with systematics. Importance and applications of biosystematics. 6 Zoological Nomenclature : International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 109-125 Bionomial and Trinomial components of classification. 7 Kinds of taxonomic characters and classification : Taxonomic characters: 126=141 Morphological, Embryological, Cytogenetical, Biochemical and Numerical. Components of classification and Linnaean hierarchy. 8 Concepts of Species : Concept of species and speciation and potential modes of 142-158 speciation. Block 3. Evolution 159-230 9 159-169 Origin of life: Special creation theory, theories of spontaneous generation, cosmozoic theory, theory of chemical evolution and spontaneous origin of life at molecular level. 10 170-184 Concept of organic evolution: Concept of organic evolution: evidences from paleontology (types of fossils and determination of age of rocks and fossils), taxonomy, comparative anatomy, comparative embryology, physiology and biochemistry and cytology. 11 185-210 Theory of organic evolution: Theories of organic evolution: Lamarckism, Darwinism, Mutation theory and modern synthetic theory. 12 211-220 Evolutionary concept: Modern evolutionary Concept and details of micro, macro and mega evolution 13 221-230 Zoogeographical relams: Major Zoo-geographical realms and distribution patterns of animals in different zoogeographical realms. Biogeographical regions in India. ZO -103 Genetics, Taxonomy and Evolution Uttarakhand Open University UNIT I: MENDALISM AND ELEMENTS OF HEREDITY Contents 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Introduction 1.3 Elements of heredity and variation 1.3.1 - Mendel's principles of heredity 1.3.2 - Linkage 1.3.3 - Coupling and repulsion 1.4 Crossing over 1.4.1 - Mechanism of crossing over 1.4.2 - Theories of crossing over 1.4.3 - Importance of crossing over 1.5 Chromosomal mapping 1.5.1 - Three point cross 1.6 Summary 1.7 Self-assessment questions 1.8 Terminal Questions Page 1 ZO -103 Genetics, Taxonomy and Evolution Uttarakhand Open University 1.1 Objectives:- Genetics is the study of genes, genetic variation , and heredity in living organisms. It is generally considered as a field of Biology , but intersects frequently with many other Life sciences and is strongly linked with the study of information systems . The father of genetics is “Gregor Johan Mendel ” a late 19 th -century scientist and Augustinian friar . Mendel studied "trait inheritance" patterns in the way traits are handed down from parents to offspring. He observed that organisms ( Pea plants, Pisum Sativum ) inherit traits by way of discrete "units of inheritance." This term, still used today, is a somewhat ambiguous definition of what is referred to as a gene. However, in this chapter you will be able to understand the heredity and variation, Mendel’s laws, linkage, crossing over and chromosomal mapping etc. 1.2 Introduction:- The term Genetics was firstly introduced by “William Bateson” in 1906 . It has been derived from the Greek word Gene - which means "to become " or "to grow into". Therefore, Genetics may be defined as "the science of coming into being" or study of heredity is called Genetics. Genetics is the science of inheritance and variation. Hence, genetics may be redefined as the science that deals with the structure, organization, transmission and function of genes, and the origin of variation in them. However, heredity may be defined "as the transmission of traits from one generation to the following generations". It is the tendency on the part of the offspring to reproduce to characters of the parents. The resemblance between individuals related by descent may be close, but it is never complete. An offspring is never an exact copy of its parents . Variation in heredity is observed in sexually produced offspring but not in asexually produced clones unless a mutation occurs. It is due to variations that each individual is unique in it and can be readily distinguished from another. Heredity and variations which go side by side are the basis of evolution . The branch of science that deals with the facts and laws of heredity and inherited variations is known as genetics. Genetics is the science which tries to explain why living things resemble with their parents, and yet differ from them. Page 2 ZO -103 Genetics, Taxonomy and Evolution Uttarakhand Open University 1.3 Elements of Heredity and Variation:- The Austrian monk “Gregor John Mendel” is considered as the Father of "Modern Genetics". Mendel made experiments on garden pea plants, species of Lathyrus (Pisum sativum ). He started his work in 1856 and continued it up to 1863 . He presented or published the first report of his work in 1865 in the Annual Proceedings of "Brunn Society for the Study of Natural Science". His original paper "Versuche Uber Pflanzenhybriden" (Experiments on plant hybridization) was published in the Proceedings of the Society in 1866 . Mendel's work was, however, ignored at that time. This was perhaps because of the following reasons: 1. He published his work in an obscure Journal. 2. Scientists failed to notice his work because at that time the scientist world was busy in the controversy arisen by Darwin's theory of "Origin of Species". 3. His ideas were ahead of his time as ignorance prevailed in that period about the cytological basis of heredity. Mendel's published work remained unattained for about 34 years . It received attention in 1900 when the same findings were independently rediscovered by three scientists namely Hugo de Vries from Holland, Carl Correns from Germany and Von Tschermak from Austria. Mendel worked how characters are transmitted from one generation to following and how genes act together to control variable traits ( variations ) such as length, height, coat color, flower color etc. They developed the central concept of genetics. According to this concept, heredity is controlled by a large number of genes that are located on the chromosomes. These are called "heredity vehicles". During 1930s beginning was made to apply biochemical an d biophysical methods for the study of chemical nature of the gene. This led to a new branch of genetics "Molecular Biology". This new approach led to the concept that genes are units of "Biological Information". Because of close association and interdependence between genetics and molecular biology the term "Molecular genetics" is now used. It is that branch of science that is concerned with the study of all aspects of the gene. Mendel made Crosses between different varieties of a garden pea . He crossed these varieties which had contrasting traits or characters. In his simpler experiments, he crossed two plants differing in one character only, such a cross was called monohybrid cross and the hybrids thus produced called monohybrids. In more advanced experiments he crossed two plants differing in Page 3 ZO -103 Genetics, Taxonomy and Evolution Uttarakhand Open University two characters. Such a cross was called dihybrid cross and the resultant hybrids were known as dihybrids . 1.3.1 Mendel's Principles of Heredity:- Since ancient times people knew that parental characters were inherited by the offspring, but did not know
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Other Contributions
    Other Contributions NATURE NOTES Amphibia: Caudata Ambystoma ordinarium. Predation by a Black-necked Gartersnake (Thamnophis cyrtopsis). The Michoacán Stream Salamander (Ambystoma ordinarium) is a facultatively paedomorphic ambystomatid species. Paedomorphic adults and larvae are found in montane streams, while metamorphic adults are terrestrial, remaining near natal streams (Ruiz-Martínez et al., 2014). Streams inhabited by this species are immersed in pine, pine-oak, and fir for- ests in the central part of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Luna-Vega et al., 2007). All known localities where A. ordinarium has been recorded are situated between the vicinity of Lake Patzcuaro in the north-central portion of the state of Michoacan and Tianguistenco in the western part of the state of México (Ruiz-Martínez et al., 2014). This species is considered Endangered by the IUCN (IUCN, 2015), is protected by the government of Mexico, under the category Pr (special protection) (AmphibiaWeb; accessed 1April 2016), and Wilson et al. (2013) scored it at the upper end of the medium vulnerability level. Data available on the life history and biology of A. ordinarium is restricted to the species description (Taylor, 1940), distribution (Shaffer, 1984; Anderson and Worthington, 1971), diet composition (Alvarado-Díaz et al., 2002), phylogeny (Weisrock et al., 2006) and the effect of habitat quality on diet diversity (Ruiz-Martínez et al., 2014). We did not find predation records on this species in the literature, and in this note we present information on a predation attack on an adult neotenic A. ordinarium by a Thamnophis cyrtopsis. On 13 July 2010 at 1300 h, while conducting an ecological study of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetological Information Service No
    Type Descriptions and Type Publications OF HoBART M. Smith, 1933 through June 1999 Ernest A. Liner Houma, Louisiana smithsonian herpetological information service no. 127 2000 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. Introduction Hobart M. Smith is one of herpetology's most prolific autiiors. As of 30 June 1999, he authored or co-authored 1367 publications covering a range of scholarly and popular papers dealing with such diverse subjects as taxonomy, life history, geographical distribution, checklists, nomenclatural problems, bibliographies, herpetological coins, anatomy, comparative anatomy textbooks, pet books, book reviews, abstracts, encyclopedia entries, prefaces and forwords as well as updating volumes being repnnted. The checklists of the herpetofauna of Mexico authored with Dr. Edward H. Taylor are legendary as is the Synopsis of the Herpetofalhva of Mexico coauthored with his late wife, Rozella B.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R
    Author Exchange Intelligent Design, Abiogenesis, and Learning from History: Dennis R. Venema A Reply to Meyer Dennis R. Venema Weizsäcker’s book The World View of Physics is still keeping me very busy. It has again brought home to me quite clearly how wrong it is to use God as a stop-gap for the incompleteness of our knowledge. If in fact the frontiers of knowledge are being pushed back (and that is bound to be the case), then God is being pushed back with them, and is therefore continually in retreat. We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don’t know; God wants us to realize his presence, not in unsolved problems but in those that are solved. Dietrich Bonhoeffer1 am thankful for this opportunity to nature, is the result of intelligence. More- reply to Stephen Meyer’s criticisms over, this assertion is proffered as the I 2 of my review of his book Signature logical basis for inferring design for the in the Cell (hereafter Signature). Meyer’s origin of biological information: if infor- critiques of my review fall into two gen- mation only ever arises from intelli- eral categories. First, he claims I mistook gence, then the mere presence of Signature for an argument against bio- information demonstrates design. A few logical evolution, rendering several of examples from Signature make the point my arguments superfluous. Secondly, easily: Meyer asserts that I have failed to refute … historical scientists can show that his thesis by not providing a “causally a presently acting cause must have adequate alternative explanation” for the been present in the past because the origin of life in that the few relevant cri- proposed candidate is the only known tiques I do provide are “deeply flawed.” cause of the effect in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of Continental Tertiary Vertebrate Faunas in the Lower Rhine Embayment (NW-Germany)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 81 (2): 177-183 (2002) Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of continental Tertiary vertebrate faunas in the Lower Rhine Embayment (NW-Germany) Th. Mors Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet/Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Palaeozoology, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: October 2000; accepted: January 2002 ^ Abstract This paper discusses the faunal content, the mammal biostratigraphy, and the environmental ecology of three important con­ tinental Tertiary vertebrate faunas from the Lower Rhine Embayment. The sites investigated are Rott (MP 30, Late Oligocene), Hambach 6C (MN 5, Middle Miocene), Frechen and Hambach 11 (both MN 16, Late Pliocene). Comparative analysis of the entire faunas shows the assemblages to exhibit many conformities in their general composition, presumably re­ sulting from their preference for wet lowlands. It appears that very similar environmental conditions for vertebrates reoc- curred during at least 20 Ma although the sites are located in a tectonically active region with high subsidence rates. Differ­ ences in the faunal composition are partly due to local differences in the depositional environment of the sites: lake deposits at the margin of the embayment (Rott), coal swamp and estuarine conditions in the centre of the embayment (Hambach 6C), and flood plain environments with small rivulets (Frechen and Hambach 1 l).The composition of the faunal assemblages (di­ versity and taxonomy) also documents faunal turnovers with extinctions and immigrations (Oligocene/Miocene and post- Middle Miocene), as a result of changing climate conditions. Additional vertebrate faunal data were retrieved from two new assemblages collected from younger strata at the Hambach mine (Hambach 11C and 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Further Records of the Plateau Snake Skink Ophiomorus Nuchalis Nilson and Andren, 1978 (Sauria: Scincidae) from Isfahan Province, Iran
    Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics (IJAB) Vol.7, No.2, 171-175, 2011 ISSN: 1735-434X Further Records of the Plateau Snake Skink Ophiomorus nuchalis Nilson and Andren, 1978 (Sauria: Scincidae) from Isfahan Province, Iran Farhadi Qomi, M.*a,d, Kami, H.G. b, Shajii, H.a, Kazemi S.M.c,d a Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran b Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran c Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran dZagros Herpetological Institute, 37156-88415, P. O. No 12, Somayyeh 14 Avenue, Qom, Iran Two specimens of Ophiomorus nuchalis from the northern part of Isfahan province were collected, one of them on June 6, 2010, and the other one on June 9, 2011. The new records were collected in southern part of the type locality. The habitat of Ophiomorus nuchalis in this region varies greatly from the previous records. Ophiomorus nuchalis is a rare scincid lizard which has already been collected from two localities. The first record is from Andren and Nilson and Andrén (1978). They described this skink as a new ,”species by two specimens collected from N52o11' ،E34o44' in the northern slope of “Siah Kooh near “Cheshmeh Shah”, “Kavir National Park”, Iran (Fig. 1, Black (Diamond)). The next two specimens were found in type locality, one in 1999 and the other one in 2000 by Mozaffari. In 2009, Mozaffari recorded this lizard from a new locality, N35o6'42.1'', E51o46'14.5''. This study, presents two new records of this species and their habitat in Isfahan Province for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ophiomorus Nuchalis Nilson & Andrén, 1978
    All_short_Notes_shorT_NoTE.qxd 08.08.2016 11:01 seite 16 92 shorT NoTE hErPETozoA 29 (1/2) Wien, 30. Juli 2016 shorT NoTE logischen Grabungen (holozän); pp. 76-83. in: distribution of Ophiomorus nuchalis CABElA , A. & G rilliTsCh , h. & T iEdEMANN , F. (Eds.): Atlas zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der Amphibien NilsoN & A NdréN , 1978: und reptilien in Österreich: Auswertung der herpeto - faunistischen datenbank der herpetologischen samm - Current status of knowledge lung des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien; Wien; (Umweltbundesamt). PUsChNiG , r. (1934): schildkrö - ten bei Klagenfurt.- Carinthia ii, Klagenfurt; 123-124/ The scincid lizard genus Ophio morus 43-44: 95. PUsChNiG , r. (1942): Über das Fortkommen A. M. C. dUMéril & B iBroN , 1839 , is dis - oder Vorkommen der griechischen land schildkröte tributed from southeastern Europe (southern und der europäischen sumpfschildkröte in Kärnten.- Balkans) to northwestern india (sindhian Carinthia ii, Klagenfurt; 132/52: 84-88. sAMPl , h. (1976): Aus der Tierwelt Kärntens. die Kriechtiere deserts) ( ANdErsoN & l EViToN 1966; s iN- oder reptilien; pp. 115-122. in: KAhlEr , F. (Ed.): die dACo & J ErEMčENKo 2008 ) and com prises Natur Kärntens; Vol. 2; Klagenfurt (heyn). sChiNd- 11 species ( BoUlENGEr 1887; ANdEr soN & lEr , M . (2005): die Europäische sumpfschild kröte in EViToN ilsoN NdréN Österreich: Erste Ergebnisse der genetischen Unter - l 1966; N & A 1978; suchungen.- sacalia, stiefern; 7: 38-41. soChU rEK , E. ANdErsoN 1999; KAzEMi et al. 2011). seven (1957): liste der lurche und Kriechtiere Kärntens.- were reported from iran including O. blan - Carinthia ii, Klagenfurt; 147/67: 150-152. fordi BoUlENGEr , 1887, O. brevipes BlAN- KEY Words: reptilia: Testudines: Emydidae: Ford , 1874, O.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter VIII Banda Oriental and Patagonia
    CHAPTER VIII. Excursion to Colonia del Sacramiento—Value of an Estancia—Cattle, how counted—Singular Breed of Oxen—Perforated Pebbles—Shepherd Dogs —Horses Broken-in, Gauchos Riding—Character of Inhabitants—Rio Plata—Flocks of Butterflies—Aëronaut Spiders—Phosphorescence of the Sea—Port Desire—Guanaco—Port St. Julian—Geology of Patago- nia—Fossil gigantic Animal—Types of Organization constant—Change in the Zoology of America—Causes of Extinction. BANDA ORIENTAL AND PATAGONIA. HAVING been delayed for nearly a fortnight in the city, I was glad to escape on board a packet bound for Monte Video. A town in a state of blockade must always be a disagreeable place of residence; in this case moreover there were constant apprehensions from robbers within. The sentinels were the worst of all; for, from their office and from having arms in their hands, they robbed with a degree of au- thority which other men could not imitate. Our passage was a very long and tedious one. The Plata looks like a noble estuary on the map; but is in truth a poor affair. A wide ex- panse of muddy water has neither grandeur nor beauty. At one time of the day, the two shores, both of which are extremely low, could just be distinguished from the deck. On arriving at Monte Video I found that the Beagle would not sail for some time, so I prepared for a short excursion in this part of Banda Oriental. Everything which I have said about the country near Maldonado is applicable to M. Vid- eo; but the land, with the one exception of the Green Mount, 450 feet high, from which it takes its name, is far more level.
    [Show full text]
  • Darevskia Raddei and Darevskia Portschinskii) May Not Lead to Hybridization Between Them
    Zoologischer Anzeiger 288 (2020) 43e52 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Zoologischer Anzeiger journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcz Research paper Syntopy of two species of rock lizards (Darevskia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii) may not lead to hybridization between them * Eduard Galoyan a, b, , Viktoria Moskalenko b, Mariam Gabelaia c, David Tarkhnishvili c, Victor Spangenberg d, Anna Chamkina b, Marine Arakelyan e a Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 33 Leninskij Prosp. 119071, Moscow, Russia b Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia c Center of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia d Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia e Department of Zoology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia article info abstract Article history: The two species of rock lizards, Darevsia raddei and Darevskia portschinskii, belong to two different Received 19 February 2020 phylogenetic clades of the same genus. They are supposed ancestors for the hybrid parthenogenetic, Received in revised form Darevskia rostombekowi. The present study aims to identify morphological features of these two species 22 June 2020 and the potential gene introgression between them in the area of sympatry. External morphological Accepted 30 June 2020 features provided the evidence of specific morphology in D. raddei and D. portschinskii: the species Available online 14 July 2020 differed in scalation and ventral coloration pattern, however, they had some proportional similarities Corresponding Editor: Alexander Kupfer within both sexes of the two species. Males of both species had relatively larger heads and shorter bodies than females. Males of D. raddei were slightly larger than males of D.
    [Show full text]
  • Life–History and Ecological Distribution of Chameleons (Reptilia, Chamaeleonidae) from the Rain Forests of Nigeria: Conservation Implications
    Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24.2 (2001) 1 Life–history and ecological distribution of chameleons (Reptilia, Chamaeleonidae) from the rain forests of Nigeria: conservation implications G. C. Akani1, O. K. Ogbalu1 & L. Luiselli2,3,* Akani, G. C., Ogbalu, O. K. & Luiselli, L., 2001. Life–history and ecological distribution of chameleons (Reptilia, Chamaeleonidae) from the rain forests of Nigeria: conservation implications. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 24.2: 1–15. Abstract Life–history and ecological distribution of chameleons (Reptilia, Chamaeleonidae) from the rain forests of Nigeria: conservation implications.— Five species of chameleons were observed in the continuous forest zone of southern Nigeria: Chamaeleo gracilis gracilis Hallowell, 1842, Chamaeleo owenii Gray, 1831, Chamaeleo cristatus Stutchbury, 1837, Chamaeleo wiedersheimi Nieden, 1910, and Rhampholeon spectrum (Bucholz 1874). Many original locality records are presented for each species. One species is apparently rare and confined to montane habitats (C. wiedersheimi), another species is relatively common and its habitat is generalist (C. gracilis), and the other three species are vulnerable and limited to specific micro–habitats. Female R. spectrum had clutch sizes of two eggs each and exhibited a prolonged reproductive season with oviposition likely occurring during the late phase of the dry season. Females of both C. cristatus (clutch sizes: 11–14 eggs) and C. owenii (clutch sizes: 15–19 eggs) have a shorter reproductive season with oviposition occurring most probably at the interphase between the end of the wet season and the onset of the dry season, and female C. gracilis (clutch sizes: 14–23 eggs) appeared to exhibit two distinct oviposition periods (one at the interphase between the end of the wet season and the onset of the dry season, and one at the peak phase of the dry season).
    [Show full text]
  • Houde2009chap64.Pdf
    Cranes, rails, and allies (Gruiformes) Peter Houde of these features are subject to allometric scaling. Cranes Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Box 30001 are exceptional migrators. While most rails are generally MSC 3AF, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA ([email protected]) more sedentary, they are nevertheless good dispersers. Many have secondarily evolved P ightlessness aJ er col- onizing remote oceanic islands. Other members of the Abstract Grues are nonmigratory. 7 ey include the A nfoots and The cranes, rails, and allies (Order Gruiformes) form a mor- sungrebe (Heliornithidae), with three species in as many phologically eclectic group of bird families typifi ed by poor genera that are distributed pantropically and disjunctly. species diversity and disjunct distributions. Molecular data Finfoots are foot-propelled swimmers of rivers and lakes. indicate that Gruiformes is not a natural group, but that it 7 eir toes, like those of coots, are lobate rather than pal- includes a evolutionary clade of six “core gruiform” fam- mate. Adzebills (Aptornithidae) include two recently ilies (Suborder Grues) and a separate pair of closely related extinct species of P ightless, turkey-sized, rail-like birds families (Suborder Eurypygae). The basal split of Grues into from New Zealand. Other extant Grues resemble small rail-like and crane-like lineages (Ralloidea and Gruoidea, cranes or are morphologically intermediate between respectively) occurred sometime near the Mesozoic– cranes and rails, and are exclusively neotropical. 7 ey Cenozoic boundary (66 million years ago, Ma), possibly on include three species in one genus of forest-dwelling the southern continents. Interfamilial diversifi cation within trumpeters (Psophiidae) and the monotypic Limpkin each of the ralloids, gruoids, and Eurypygae occurred within (Aramidae) of both forested and open wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Rallidae
    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
    [Show full text]
  • View a Copy of This Licence, Visit
    Tarkhnishvili et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020) 20:122 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01690-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Genotypic similarities among the parthenogenetic Darevskia rock lizards with different hybrid origins David Tarkhnishvili1* , Alexey Yanchukov2, Mehmet Kürşat Şahin3, Mariam Gabelaia1, Marine Murtskhvaladze1, Kamil Candan4, Eduard Galoyan5, Marine Arakelyan6, Giorgi Iankoshvili1, Yusuf Kumlutaş4, Çetin Ilgaz4, Ferhat Matur4, Faruk Çolak2, Meriç Erdolu7, Sofiko Kurdadze1, Natia Barateli1 and Cort L. Anderson1 Abstract Background: The majority of parthenogenetic vertebrates derive from hybridization between sexually reproducing species, but the exact number of hybridization events ancestral to currently extant clonal lineages is difficult to determine. Usually, we do not know whether the parental species are able to contribute their genes to the parthenogenetic vertebrate lineages after the initial hybridization. In this paper, we address the hypothesis, whether some genotypes of seven phenotypically distinct parthenogenetic rock lizards (genus Darevskia) could have resulted from back-crosses of parthenogens with their presumed parental species. We also tried to identify, as precise as possible, the ancestral populations of all seven parthenogens. Results: We analysed partial mtDNA sequences and microsatellite genotypes of all seven parthenogens and their presumed ansectral species, sampled across the entire geographic range of parthenogenesis in this group. Our results confirm the previous designation of the parental species, but further specify the maternal populations that are likely ancestral to different parthenogenetic lineages. Contrary to the expectation of independent hybrid origins of the unisexual taxa, we found that genotypes at multiple loci were shared frequently between different parthenogenetic species. The highest proportions of shared genotypes were detected between (i) D.
    [Show full text]