A Prediction Model to Determine Childhood Epilepsy After 1 Or More Paroxysmal Events Eric Van Diessen, Herm J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Prediction Model to Determine Childhood Epilepsy After 1 Or More Paroxysmal Events Eric Van Diessen, Herm J A Prediction Model to Determine Eric van Diessen, MD, PhD, a Herm J. Lamberink, MD, a Willem M. Otte, PhD, a, b Nynke Doornebal, MD, c ChildhoodOebele F. Brouwer, MD, PhD,c, d Floor Epilepsy E. Jansen, MD, PhD, a Kees AfterP.J. Braun, MD, PhD 1a or More Paroxysmal Events OBJECTIVES: abstract The clinical profile of children who had possible seizures is heterogeneous, and accuracy of diagnostic testing is limited. We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model that determines the risk of childhood epilepsy by combining available information at METHODS: first consultation. We retrospectively collected data of 451 children who visited our outpatient department for diagnostic workup related to 1 or more paroxysmal event(s). At least 1 year of follow-up was available for all children who were diagnosed with epilepsy or in whom diagnosis remained inconclusive. Clinical characteristics (sex, age of first seizure, event description,n medical history) and EEG report were used as predictor variables for building a multivariate logistic regression model. Performance was validated in an external cohort RESULTS: ( = 187). – Model discrimination was excellent, with an area under the receiver operating – – characteristic curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.80 0.92), a positive predictive value of 0.93 (95% CI 0.83 0.97) and a negative predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 0.80). Model discrimination in a selective subpopulation of children with uncertain – diagnosis after initial clinical workup was good, with an area under the receiver operating CONCLUSIONS: characteristic curve of 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 0.87). This model may prove to be valuable because predictor variables together with a first interictal EEG can be available at first consultation. A Web application is provided (http:// epilepsypredictio ntools. info/ first- consultation) to facilitate the diagnostic process for clinicians who are confronted with children with paroxysmal events, suspected of having an epileptic origin. WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: In clinical practice, epileptic seizures in children often go aDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus and bBiomedical MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; underrecognized because of the heterogeneous cDepartment of Pediatrics, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands; and dDepartment of Neurology, University clinical symptoms and limited sensitivity of the initial Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands interictal EEG. As a result, diagnosis of epilepsy may be delayed. Dr van Diessen designed the study, collected the patient data, performed statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Dr Lamberink collected the patient data, performed statistical analysis, WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: A decision model was built and wrote the manuscript; Dr Otte designed the study, performed statistical analysis, and wrote with the clinical information and the initial interictal the manuscript; Drs Doornebal and Brouwer collected the patient data and commented on the EEG available at first consultation of 638 children. statistical analysis and the manuscript; Dr Jansen designed the study, collected the patient data, This model, available to the general readership as and commented on the statistical analysis and the manuscript; Dr Braun designed the study and a Web application, may facilitate the diagnostic commented on the statistical analysis and the manuscript; and all authors approved the final process for clinicians. manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. DOI: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2018- 0931 To cite: van Diessen E, Lamberink HJ, Otte WM, et al. A Accepted for publication Sep 5, 2018 Prediction Model to Determine Childhood Epilepsy After 1 or More Paroxysmal Events. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20180931 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 2, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 142, number 6, December 2018:e20180931 ARTICLE A paroxysmal event can be consultation after 1 or more possible department. The institutional frightful for1 both children and seizures. Model performance was ethical committees of both hospitals caregivers. When an epileptic validated with an external cohort. approved the study and concluded origin is considered, the associated To improve the implementation in that the Dutch Medical Research ’ psychosocial aspects may negatively clinical practice, we constructed Involving Human Subjects Act did not influence the child2, 3 s health-related a Web application that may apply, and written informed consent quality of life. Recurrent epileptic assist clinicians to estimate the Outcomewas not required. Definition seizures may be harmful– to the individualized probability of epilepsy developing brain, leading4 6 to cognitive in children who present after 1 or and behavioral deficits. This more possible seizures. The outcome measure was presence emphasizes the need for an early METHODS or absence of epilepsy, defined as: (1) and accurate diagnosis. However, at least 2 unprovoked seizures within establishing the epileptic origin of Subject Selection 1 year, judged by an experienced a paroxysmal event in children is child neurologist to be epileptic in often challenging in clinical practice, origin; or (2) 1 unprovoked seizure due to a limited sensitivity of We retrospectively collected clinical – and epileptiform EEG abnormalities heterogeneous clinical symptoms data of children referred after 1 or 7 9 at first consultation or at later sleep- and interictal EEG recordings. In more paroxysmal events, suspected deprived or prolonged EEG that children with uncertain diagnosis, of having an epileptic origin. Data confirm the diagnosis of an epilepsy additional investigations including from 451 children who visited the syndrome, or the demonstration of prolonged or sleep-deprived EEG and outpatient department of pediatric a typical epileptogenic brain lesion MRI are required, with subsequent neurology, University Medical Center 7, 10, 11 on MRI. If diagnosis of epilepsy was delay in making a final diagnosis. Utrecht, between January 2008 discarded on the basis of clinical Otherwise, diagnostic inaccuracy can and May 2013 were used to build a history, EEG results, other ancillary lead to a false diagnosis of epilepsy, clinical decision model (development investigations, or at least 1 year of resulting in unnecessary antiepileptic cohort). Data of 187 children who uneventful follow-up, we attempted drug treatment or outpatient visited the outpatient department to reappoint the diagnosis. Children admissions and delay of other of pediatrics, Martini Hospital in whom a definitive diagnosis was important ancillary investigations. Groningen, between January 2013 inconclusive at the end of follow-up, To this end, a clinical tool that and July 2016 were collected as an or who were lost to follow-up, were facilitates accurate diagnosis of first external cohort to validate the model classified as having no epilepsy. The paroxysmal events in children at (validation cohort). All children were consulting pediatric neurologist initial evaluation would be highly referred by a general practitioner, always made the definitive diagnosis. valuable. pediatrician, neurologist, or via the Predictor Variables emergency department. In addition Previous efforts to identify to clinical history and physical prognostic clinical variables after – examination, the report of a standard Potential predictor variables were first consultation, focused on the 8, 10, 12 14 EEG recording performed at time selected from previous cohort risk of seizure recurrence – of first consultation was used. At studies in children with newly in patients with first indisputable 16 20 least 1 year of clinical follow-up was diagnosed epilepsies. Predictor epileptic seizures and patients available for all children who were variables were required to be with ambiguous events, were eventually diagnosed with epilepsy routinely available at the time of first excluded from further analysis. and for those whose diagnosis consultation. Information on age at These restrictions may hamper remained inconclusive after initial consultation, sex, age at first event, its value in daily practice because evaluation. Children in whom medical history, relevant family diagnostic inaccuracy of first seizures 15 diagnosis of epilepsy was discarded history, psychomotor development, is common. Also, children are not directly after first consultation number of events and detailed event always referred directly after a first were referred back to their general description, and the EEG report was possible seizure because of delayed 4, 7 practitioner with explicit instructions available and extracted into separate recognition. to report new possible seizures. variables in a database. Age at Here, we determined the value Excluded were children in whom the consultation and at first event were of clinical and EEG data routinely diagnosis of epilepsy had already truncated at month level. Medical available at first consultation and been confirmed by the referring history of a child was categorized “ ” constructed a prediction model to health care professional before into 3 predictor variables, namely determine the risk of epilepsy at first consultation at the outpatient neurologic history in the presence Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 2, 2021 2 VAN DIESSEN et al of a history
Recommended publications
  • 1 ILAE Classification & Definition of Epilepsy Syndromes in the Neonate
    ILAE Classification & Definition of Epilepsy Syndromes in the Neonate and Infant: Position Statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions Authors: Sameer M Zuberi1, Elaine Wirrell2, Elissa Yozawitz3, Jo M Wilmshurst4, Nicola Specchio5, Kate Riney6, Ronit Pressler7, Stephane Auvin8, Pauline Samia9, Edouard Hirsch10, O Carter Snead11, Samuel Wiebe12, J Helen Cross13, Paolo Tinuper14,15, Ingrid E Scheffer16, Rima Nabbout17 1. Paediatric Neurosciences Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children & Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Glasgow, UK. 2. Divisions of Child and Adolescent Neurology and Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA. 3. Isabelle Rapin Division of Child Neurology of the Saul R Korey Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY USA. 4. Department of Paediatric Neurology, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 5. Rare and Complex Epilepsy Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesu’ Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Rome, Italy 6. Neurosciences Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia. 7. Clinical Neuroscience, UCL- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE London, UK 8. Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Robert-Debré, INSERM NeuroDiderot, DMU Innov-RDB, Neurologie Pédiatrique, Member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paris, France. 9. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, East Africa. 1 10. Neurology Epilepsy Unit “Francis Rohmer”, INSERM 1258, FMTS, Strasbourg University, France.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Temporal Lobectomy Upon Two Cases of an Unusual Form of Mental Deficiency by D
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.17.4.267 on 1 November 1954. Downloaded from J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1954, 17, 267. THE EFFECT OF TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY UPON TWO CASES OF AN UNUSUAL FORM OF MENTAL DEFICIENCY BY D. W. LIDDELL and D. W. C. NORTHFIELD From Runwtvell Hospital, Wickford, Essex In 1898, when giving the final particulars and the Case Histories necropsy findings of a case of epilepsy which fully Case l.-M. G., aged 18 years, was referred to exemplified dreamy states and automatisms, Hugh- Runwell Hospital from the Royal Eastern Counties lings Jackson (1931a) wrote that there were post- Hospital because of bouts of violent uncontrollable epileptic actions " of a kind which in a man fully behaviour and repeated attempts to abscond. He was himself would be criminal ". But another 25 years the seventh child of healthy working-class parents. were to elapse before Penfield began his studies on There is no family history of epilepsy. His birth was brain-scars (Penfield and Erickson, 1941) which were normal and he was breast fed for nine months. He guest. Protected by copyright. eventually to secure for surgery a began to walk and talk at about 14 months. As a child place in the be was placid but active, easily managed, and there were treatment of epilepsy. At first the operations were no difficulties in toilet training. restricted to those patients resistant to medical At the age of 7 years he fell out of a tree and was treatment in whom there was conclusive evidence of momentarily unconscious.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Seizure Semiology in Lateralizing and Localizing Partially Originating Seizures
    Review Article The value of seizure semiology in lateralizing and localizing partially originating seizures Mohammed M. Jan, MBChB, FRCP(C). observations help in lateralizing (left versus right) and ABSTRACT localizing (involved brain region) the seizure onset. Therefore, this information is vital not only for seizure Diagnosing epilepsy depends heavily on a detailed, and accurate description of the abnormal transient classification, but more so for identification of surgical neurological manifestations. Observing the candidates. The EEG and neuroimaging, particularly seizures yields important semiologic features that MRI, are needed to identify focal physiological and characterize epilepsy. Video-EEG monitoring allows pathological brain abnormalities.3-5 The development of the identification of important lateralizing (left video-EEG monitoring has allowed careful correlation of versus right), and localizing (involved brain region) semiologic features with simultaneous EEG recordings.6 semiologic features. This information is vital for As a result, clinical semiology gained greater reliability identifying the seizure origin for possible surgical in diagnosing specific seizure types and localizing their interventions. The aim of this review is to present a onset.7 The aim of this review is to present a summary summary of important semiologic characteristics of various seizures that are important for accurate seizure of important semiologic characteristics of various lateralization and localization. This would most seizures that are needed for accurate lateralization likely help during reviewing video-EEG recorded and localization. This would most likely help during seizures of intractable patients for possible epilepsy reviewing video-EEG recorded seizures of intractable surgery. Semiologic features of partial and secondarily patients for possible epilepsy surgery. generalized seizures can be grouped into one of 4 History taking.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders: a Resource Guide for Parents
    $5HVRXUFH *XLGH IRU3DUHQWV www.chadkids.org/epilepsyonline Epilepsy and Seizure Disorder: A Parent Resource Guide ¡ ¡ ¨ © £ ¤ ¢ ¥ ¦ § ¦ ! " $ # ¡ ¨ ' ( £ ¤ ¢ ¥ ¦ %& ¥ - . , ! # ! ) * + * ' - / ! !! ! # ! + ) ' - 00 ! , ! # ! + ) ¡ ¡¡ ¨ ( ( £ ¤ ## ¢ ¥ ¦ % 12 - - 03 ! # # ) * 0 !! ) + 0 , # ! ! ) * + " ' 4 0$ ! ! , # ! + ) 5 8 9 £7 7 162 6 ¦ ¥ 2: ( - 0; ! < - 0> = ? @ 3A ! = ! # 'C B D 3 0 ! ! C D 33 ? ! ! D 3 B ! < 3; = ! # - 3> @ ! ! EF ¤ ¤ 7 ¢ G % H ? 3/ ! ! = C - A I 0 J www.chadkids.org/epilepsyonline Epilepsy and Seizure Disorder: A Parent Resource Guide 2 WWhathat is epilepsy/seizure disorder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
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Epilepsy
    DICTIONARY OF EPILEPSY PART I: DEFINITIONS .· DICTIONARY OF EPILEPSY PART I: DEFINITIONS PROFESSOR H. GASTAUT President, University of Aix-Marseilles, France in collaboration with an international group of experts ~ WORLD HEALTH- ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1973 ©World Health Organization 1973 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accord­ ance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. For rights of reproduction or translation of WHO publications, in part or in toto, application should be made to the Office of Publications and Translation, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. The World Health Organization welcomes such applications. PRINTED IN SWITZERLAND WHO WORKING GROUP ON THE DICTIONARY OF EPILEPSY1 Professor R. J. Broughton, Montreal Neurological Institute, Canada Professor H. Collomb, Neuropsychiatric Clinic, University of Dakar, Senegal Professor H. Gastaut, Dean, Joint Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Aix-Marseilles, France Professor G. Glaser, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA Professor M. Gozzano, Director, Neuropsychiatric Clinic, Rome, Italy Dr A. M. Lorentz de Haas, Epilepsy Centre "Meer en Bosch", Heemstede, Netherlands Professor P. Juhasz, Rector, University of Medical Science, Debrecen, Hungary Professor A. Jus, Chairman, Psychiatric Department, Academy of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland Professor A. Kreindler, Institute of Neurology, Academy of the People's Republic of Romania, Bucharest, Romania Dr J. Kugler, Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Federal Republic of Germany Dr H. Landolt, Medical Director, Swiss Institute for Epileptics, Zurich, Switzerland Dr B. A. Lebedev, Chief, Mental Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Dr R. L. Masland, Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA Professor F.
    [Show full text]
  • Epileptic Psychosis and Insanity: Case Study and Review PATRICK D
    Epileptic Psychosis and Insanity: Case Study and Review PATRICK D. BACON, MD ELISSA P. BENEDEK, MD This brief clinical report focuses on a case in which we were ordered by the Wayne County Circuit Court to complete a forensic evaluation of a 26- year-old man facing criminal charges of Felonious Assault and Criminal Sexual Conduct. The patient believed that he had committed the offenses but that his behavior was substantially influenced by a recently diagnosed seizure disorder. After a complete clinical exam, the forensic examiners (Patrick Bacon, MD and Elissa Benedek, MD) reported to the court the defendant was psychotic at the time of the alleged offense and this psychosis was associated with his epileptic disorder but did not represent an epileptic automatism. In the past century, many epileptics charged with a crime have defended themselves by arguing that their alleged criminal behavior was the result of an epileptic automatism. Investigators have delineated research criteria to evaluate the question of whether the behavior of these individuals could have been the result of an automatism.l.2,:l To our knowledge, no epileptic has argued he or she was legally insane at the time ofthe alleged offense and his or her insanity was due to a psychotic episode that occurred as a· concomitant of his or her epileptic disorder. Psychotic episodes that occur in association with various epileptic disorders have been reported by sev­ eral investigators. 4,5 The characteristics of these psychotic episodes are significantly different from the characteristics of epileptic automatisms. We review the patient we evaluated and discuss the characteristics of au­ tomatisms and epileptic psychoses that allow each to be recognized as a distinct clinical entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Management of Epilepsies in Children and Young People 81
    81 ���� ������������������������������������������� Diagnosis and management of epilepsies 81 in children and young people A national clinical guideline 1 Introduction 1 2 Diagnosis 3 3 Investigative procedures 6 4 Management 11 5 Antiepileptic drug treatment 15 6 Management of prolonged or serial seizures and convulsive status epilepticus 21 7 Behaviour and learning 23 8 Models of care 25 9 Development of the guideline 27 10 Implementation and audit 31 Annexes 34 Abbreviations 47 References 48 March 2005 COPIES OF ALL SIGN GUIDELINES ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT WWW.SIGN.AC.UK KEY TO EVIDENCE STATEMENTS AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATIONS LEVELS OF EVIDENCE 1++ High quality meta-analyses, systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or RCTs with a very low risk of bias 1+ Well conducted meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a low risk of bias 1 - Meta-analyses, systematic reviews of RCTs, or RCTs with a high risk of bias 2++ High quality systematic reviews of case control or cohort studies High quality case control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding or bias and a high probability that the relationship is causal 2+ Well conducted case control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding or bias and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal 2 - Case control or cohort studies with a high risk of confounding or bias and a significant risk that the relationship is not causal 3 Non-analytic studies, eg case reports, case series 4 Expert opinion GRADES OF RECOMMENDATION Note: The grade of recommendation relates to the strength of the evidence on which the recommendation is based.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Simple Partial Seizure Complex.Pdf
    Epilepsy & Behavior 22 (2011) 651–658 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Epilepsy & Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yebeh Review What makes a simple partial seizure complex? Andrea E. Cavanna a,b,⁎, Hugh Rickards a, Fizzah Ali a a The Michael Trimble Neuropsychiatry Research Group, Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Birmingham and BSMHFT, Birmingham, UK b National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurology, and UCL, London, UK article info abstract Article history: The assessment of ictal consciousness has been the landmark criterion for the differentiation between simple Received 26 September 2011 and complex partial seizures over the last three decades. After review of the historical development of the Accepted 2 October 2011 concept of “complex partial seizure,” the difficulties surrounding the simple versus complex dichotomy are Available online 13 November 2011 addressed from theoretical, phenomenological, and neurophysiological standpoints. With respect to con- sciousness, careful analysis of ictal semiology shows that both the general level of vigilance and the specific Keywords: contents of the conscious state can be selectively involved during partial seizures. Moreover, recent neuroim- Epilepsy fi Complex partial seizures aging ndings, coupled with classic electrophysiological studies, suggest that the neural substrate of ictal Consciousness alterations of consciousness is twofold: focal hyperactivity in the limbic structures generates the complex Experiential phenomena psychic phenomena responsible for the altered contents of consciousness, and secondary disruption of the Limbic system network involving the thalamus and the frontoparietal association cortices affects the level of awareness. These data, along with the localization information they provide, should be taken into account in the formu- lation of new criteria for the classification of seizures with focal onset.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit
    Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit A Resource for Parents with a Newly Diagnosed Child 136EMC Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit A Resource for Parents with a Newly Diagnosed Child “Obstacles are the things we see when we take our eyes off our goals.” -Zig Ziglar EPILEPSY & MY CHILD TOOLKIT • TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Purpose .............................................................................................................................................5 How to Use This Toolkit ....................................................................................................................5 About Epilepsy What is Epilepsy? ..............................................................................................................................7 What is a Seizure? .............................................................................................................................8 Myths & Facts ...................................................................................................................................8 How is Epilepsy Diagnosed? ............................................................................................................9 How is Epilepsy Treated? ..................................................................................................................10 Managing Epilepsy How Can You Help Manage Your Child’s Care? ...............................................................................13 What Should You Do if Your Child has a Seizure? ............................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Seizure Ending Signs in Patients with Dyscognitive Focal Seizures*
    Journal Identification = EPD Article Identification = 0763 Date: September 4, 2015 Time: 2:38 pm Original article with video sequences Epileptic Disord 2015; 17 (3): 255-62 Seizure ending signs in patients with dyscognitive focal seizures* Jay R. Gavvala, Elizabeth E. Gerard, Mícheál Macken, Stephan U. Schuele Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA Received October 11, 2014; Accepted July 04, 2015 ABSTRACT – Aim. Signs indicating the end of a focal seizure with loss of awareness and/or responsiveness but without progression to focal or gener- alized motor symptoms are poorly defined and can be difficult to determine. Not recognizing the transition from ictal to postictal behaviour can affect seizure reporting accuracy by family members and may lead to delayed or a lack of examination during EEG monitoring, erroneous seizure localiza- tion and inadequate medical intervention for prolonged seizure duration. Methods. Our epilepsy monitoring unit database was searched for focal seizures without secondary generalization for the period from 2007 to 2011. The first focal seizure in a patient with loss of awareness and/or responsive- ness and/or behavioural arrest, with or without automatisms, was included. Seizures without objective symptoms or inadequate video-EEG quality were excluded. Results. A total of 67 patients were included, with an average age of 41.7 years. Thirty-six of the patients had seizures from the left hemisphere and 29 from the right. All patients showed an abrupt change in motor activity and resumed contact with the environment as a sign of clinical seizure end- ing. Specific ending signs (nose wiping, coughing, sighing, throat clearing, or laughter) were seen in 23 of 47 of temporal lobe seizures and 7 of 20 extra-temporal seizures.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilepsy in Children – Brain Growth and Behavior
    logy & N ro eu u r e o N p h f y o s l i a o l n o r Kanemura and Aihara, J Neurol Neurophysiol 2013, S2 g u y o J Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology ISSN: 2155-9562 DOI: 10.4172/2155-9562.S2-006 ReviewResearch Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Epilepsy in Children – Brain Growth and Behavior Hideaki Kanemura1* and Masao Aihara2 1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Japan 2Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Japan Abstract The degree of behavioral problems associated with epilepsy in children is greater than would be expected on the basis of the existence of a chronic illness alone. Involvement of the frontal lobe such as atypical evolution of benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BCECTS), epilepsy with continuous spike-waves during slow sleep (CSWS), and frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) are characterized by impairment of neuropsychological abilities, and are frequently associated with behavioral disorders. In volumetric studies using three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), frontal and prefrontal lobe volumes revealed growth disturbance in patients with atypical evolution of BCECTS, CSWS, and FLE compared with those of normal subjects. These studies also revealed that in patients with shorter seizure durations and abnormal EEG periods, developmental abnormalities of the frontal lobe were soon restored to a more normal growth ratio. Conversely, growth disturbances of the prefrontal lobes were persistent in the patients with longer seizure durations and abnormal EEG periods. These findings suggest that seizure and the duration of paroxysmal anomalies may be associated with prefrontal lobe growth abnormalities, which are associated with neuropsychological problems.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-9 Seizures
    ICD-9 CM codes relevant to the diagnosis and common complications of Seizure* ******** indicates intervening codes have been left of this list Note that the first codes, under Symptoms, may be appropriate for a first seizure or seizures prior to a diagnosis of epilepsy. SYMPTOMS (780-789) 780 General symptoms 780.3 Convulsions Excludes: convulsions: epileptic (345.10-345.91) in newborn (779.0) 780.31 Febrile convulsions Febrile seizures 780.39 Other convulsions Convulsive disorder NOS Fits NOS Seizures NOS ******** OTHER DISORDERS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (340-349) 345 Epilepsy and recurrent seizures The following fifth-digit subclassification is for use with categories 345.0, .1, .4-.9: 0 without mention of intractable epilepsy 1 with intractable epilepsy Excludes: progressive myoclonic epilepsy (333.2) 345.0 Generalized nonconvulsive epilepsy Absences: atonic typical Minor epilepsy Petit mal Pykno-epilepsy Seizures: akinetic atonic 345.1 Generalized convulsive epilepsy Epileptic seizures: clonic myoclonic tonic tonic-clonic Grand mal Major epilepsy Excludes: convulsions: NOS (780.3) infantile (780.3) newborn (779.0) infantile spasms (345.6) 345.2 Petit mal status Epileptic absence status 345.3 Grand mal status Status epilepticus NOS Excludes: epilepsia partialis continua (345.7) status: psychomotor (345.7) temporal lobe (345.7) 345.4 Partial epilepsy, with impairment of consciousness Epilepsy: limbic system partial: secondarily generalized with memory and ideational disturbances psychomotor psychosensory temporal lobe Epileptic
    [Show full text]