Zenobia, Queen of Palmyra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zenobia, Queen of Palmyra \A^ i/ p/^Oc^^., J'-'(fJ LI B RAFIY OF THE UNIVLRSITY Of ILLl NOI5 80.3 Ok2z V. I QUEEN OF PALMYRA. VOLUME I. Digitized by tine Internet Archive in 2010 witii funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Ghampaign http://www.archive.org/details/zenobiaqueenofpa01okee : ZENOBIA, aUEEN OF PALMYRA FOUNDED ON HISTORY. IN TWO VOLUMES. BY THE AUTHOR OF PATRIARCHAL TIMES. VOL. I. LONDON Printed by J. Dennett, Leather Lane, Holbom; YARD. FOR F. C. AND J. RIVINGTON, ST. PAUL'S CHURCH 1S14. — ^Z3 CONTENTS. BOOK I. Page The reflections of Orodes, a Senator of Palmyra —The oracle of Balbec—Odenathus blessing the infant Zenobia^— Septimia's lamentations —The character of Elkanah, the Hebrew— The oracle of Apollo consulted—Youths as- semble in the house of Elkanah—Syrian tra- vellers —Septimia quits Palmyra, and arrives in Armenia • • • •_ BOOK II. Condition of the youths when grown to man- hood—Description of Zenobia —Elkanah ar- rives in Armenia—The tomb of Gordian /^ They leave Zaantha and travel southward ^ Nineveh —Babylon—The Arabs—They jour- ~5 ney through the desert—Zenobia's first sight ^ of Palmyra—They enter the city at night Meeting of the senate, priests, and vestals r""* —Zenobia acknowledged 49 ^, VOL. T. a VI CONTENTS. BOOK III. P3S' Beneficial effects of Zenobia's return to Palmyra —The arrival of Odenathus — Messengers sent to Sapor the Persian King, requesting his friendship and alliance—The remarks of Zenobia on Odenathus' pronouncing his de- ceased wife's funeral oration—Marcus Teren- tius, a soldier, condemned to death—Zenobia saves him—Longinus instructing Zenobia— They are joined by Odenathus and Antiochus —The latter repair to the Senate House—An insolent and hostile answer is received from Sapor—Odenathus and his armies sent against Persia 125 BOOK IV. Septimia, thinking herself neglected by her daughter, declines in health—Is happily un- deceived—New Zaantha—Odenathus returns triumphant from the Persian war—Marcus Terentius receives his civic crown—Odena- thus proclaimed Prince of Palmyra—Asks Zenobia in marriage—Is rejected—Elkanah exacts of Zenobia an oath never to abjure the Jewish faith—She is accidentally prevented taking it by the child Herodian—Odenathus CONTENTS. Vli Page renews his suit for Zenobia's hand — Is de- clared King of the East—And married to Zenobia • • ••• 157^ BOOK V. Reflections on the present state of Palmyra-— The return of Odenathus and Zenobia from Persia — Orosanga a Persian captive con- demned — Valerius dispossessed of his go- vernment of Arethusa, and Harmadrian ap- pointed in his stead—-The seditious artificer in brass spoken to by the King—The enmity of two merchants, named Artamon and Dio- nysius—The return of Cassimus, a wood- cutter, from the desert —The prison of Pal- myra—Herodian offers half his Persian spoils to Meonius —Victoria married to Herodian —The visit of Odenathus to the guard- house ••».. 22^ BOOK VI. Archery in the plains of Palmyra—Harmadrian, the new governor of Arethusa,^ arrives from thence—Meonius pardoned by his uncle— The chase of the elephant— The hall of audience—Odenathus and his son quit Pal- fin CONTENTS. VtlS*- myra, and go to Larissa—The desert—^The traveller—The death of Meonius—The mur- dered bodies of Odenathus and Herodian found in the woods—They are brought back to Palmyra—Zenobia's despair. 295 ' ZENOBIA5 QUEEN OF PALMYRA. BOOK I. ARGUMENT. The reflections of Orodes, a Senator of Palmyra-^ The oracle of BaVoec—Odenathiis blessing the infant Zenohia— Sepfimia's lamentations—The cha- racter of Elkanah, the Hebrew—The oracle of Apollo consulted— Youths assemble in the house of Elkanah—Syrian travellers — Septimia quits Palmyra, and arrives in Armenia. Man at his birth is feeble and defence- less —he daily hnproves in strength, in stature, in dignity, and in wisdom, until arrived at the excellency of each, he gra- dually decays, sinking into a state as weak as at the birth. Such was the remark of Orodes as -walking alone without the ramparts of Palmyra. Again he silently pemsed an VOL. I. B — S ZENOBIA, account lately received of the murder of the Emperor Gordian^ and again relapsed into profound meditation. It is thus with nations and empires ; they date their decline from the period at which they reach their utmost height. O Palmyra ! heloved spot that gave me hirth, say, at what point hast thou ar- rived ? Art thou now only in thine in- fancy, or is thy glorious manhood yet to come ? Is it thy fate to stand for ages proudly insular, or art thou destined to be the early prey of the Persian ravager, or of the Roman sword ? Palmyra, upon which my soul dotes more than son ever loved mother, for what art thou reserved? —No warrior I, or neither Roman or Persian should advance one hostile step against thee ; but though unable to de- fend thee, and unskilled in battle, the gods have blessed me with a heart burn- ing with zeal for thy welfare, and a head capable of commanding that heart to pursue the interests of my couutiy to the utmost. Q.UEEN OF PALMYRA. 3 Orodes walked on in deep and solemn thought^ his steps at times hasty, at others slow and languid—the expression of his countenance and involuntary gestures be- speaking the agitation of his spirits ; but when, a few moments after, he sat down upon a bank, and with a reed traced un- meaning characters in the sand, at that instant the fate of Palmyra (though con- cealed from human foresight) was de- creed. Orodes wrote in sand, but the destinies of his country were engraved in adamant. Orodes with flushed cheek and beating heart, as he rose, pronounced, It shall be so—Fate echoed, It shall be so. What is tbe existence of a single per- son when compared with that of thou- sands ? Not a day passes but the republic is increased in population : —there are but few mansions in the city and province that cannot boast of an infant race, why then should thus suddenly all eyes, hopes, B 2 4 ZENOBIA^ and wislies rest upon one babe ? why, within these few days, is the palace of Antlochus crowded with eager curiosity and anxious enquiries? A birth transcend- ing human expectation could not create a more en^thusiastical sensation, and to heathen Pahnyra this birth is indeed por- tentous, for within these six days it was spoken by the oracle of Apollo in Balbec, ^ Look to Zenobia, the babe born of An- tiochus and Septimia, for her fate and that of Palmyra are one.' Months -glided away, and time only served to strengthen the idolatry of the Palmyrenians, so carefully was the infant watched, and so ardently attended. Doth it sleep ? enquired the father, entering, and gently he raised the trans- parent veil that fell from the shoulders of Septimia, forujing a soft and fragrant tent, under which reposed the fairest babe that the East had ever nourished. Turn- ing, he beckoned to a youth who stood at the threshold with Orodes, and desired hiin to advance with caution : he did ad- aUEEN or PALMYRA. 6 Vance with breathless caution^ and vvlien near, he stooped to gaze, and long had gazed in silent awe and rapture, had not Septimia drawn the veil, and snatclied the child from his sight. One more look, exclaimed he—bnt one.—Away to the chase of the lion, re- plied Septimia, smiling, nor add thyself to the number of the idle ones who latterly neglect all duty, pleasure, and employ- ment, under the shew of paying homage to my cherub.—O most cruel, to send me to certain death, returned the youth ; for with this image before my eyes, can I bf^. on my guard in my encounter of the lion? I am but now arrived from Antioch, sent by our general Balista to hail Palmyra's infant treasure, and here I solemnly pass my word never to rise, until I can tell him that I have held it in my arms. Comply, Septimia, said Antiochus, for the geillant Odenathus was never known to break his word to a female. The youth kneeling, received on his arms the sleeping babe from those of its mother, B 3 ; S ZEN0BIA5 and exclaimed, after a long and anxious look on its uncovered features, May the god of the sun, which hath said that the fate of our nation is entwined with thine, shed on both his purest rays ! his blessing be on both, that they may alike increase in beauty, power, and honour : —mayest thou, Zenobia, uever forsake his worship, or he deny thee his glorious and benign influence. — Behold that angelic smile passing over the rosy cheek, as if in gra- titude. Take her, take her, Septimia for should she wake and I meet her look, thou mightst bind me to the cradle, and the wild beasts of Parthia stalk into our streets. Antiochus listened to the noble youth with the gratified fondness of a father, and Orodes—what were the thoughts at this moment of the subtle, scheming Orodes ? Wild and extravagant would they have been deemed if they then had been uttered, yet futurity confirmed them. And did Septimia at heart rejoice ? was she flattered by this universal homage ?— tlUEEN OF PALMYRA. 7 Every mother envied Septimia, and Sep- timia every mother. Though a Hebrew by descent^ yet was she and her brother Elkanah born at Seleucia on the Tigris. Early in life she became the victim of avaricious parents, who, to secure an il- histiious and wealthy alliance, sacrificed her in marriage to paganism and Anti- ochus : a willing sacrifice, it is true, but not many months had passed ere she dis- covered that her husband, a strict fol- lower of every civil custom and relis^ious rite, would, on demand, have parted for ever with his wife, and given his chil- dren burnt sacrifices to Belus.
Recommended publications
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 27 Sasanian Empire
    4/12/2012 Lecture 27 Sasanian Empire HIST 213 Spring 2012 Sasanian Empire (224-651 CE) Successors of the Achaemenids 224 CE Ardashir I • a descendant of Sasan – gave his name to the new Sasanian dynasty, • defeated the Parthians • The Sasanians saw themselves as the successors of the Achaemenid Persians. 1 4/12/2012 Shapur I (r. 241–72 CE) • One of the most energetic and able Sasanian rulers • the central government was strengthened • the coinage was reformed • Zoroastrianism was made the state religion • The expansion of Sasanian power in the west brought conflict with Rome Shapur I the Conqueror • conquers Bactria and Kushan in east • led several campaigns against Rome in west Penetrating deep into Eastern-Roman territory • conquered Antiochia (253 or 256) Defeated the Roman emperors: • Gordian III (238–244) • Philip the Arab (244–249) • Valerian (253–260) – 259 Valerian taken into captivity after the Battle of Edessa – disgrace for the Romans • Shapur I celebrated his victory by carving the impressive rock reliefs in Naqsh-e Rostam. Rome defeated in battle Relief of Shapur I at Naqsh-e Rostam, showing the two defeated Roman Emperors, Valerian and Philip the Arab 2 4/12/2012 Terry Jones, Barbarians (BBC 2006) clip 1=9:00 to end clip 2 start - … • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_WqUbp RChU&feature=related • http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&featu re=endscreen&v=QxS6V3lc6vM Shapur I Religiously Tolerant Intensive development plans • founded many cities, some settled in part by Roman emigrants. – included Christians who could exercise their faith freely under Sasanian rule • Shapur I particularly favored Manichaeism – He protected Mani and sent many Manichaean missionaries abroad • Shapur I befriends Babylonian rabbi Shmuel – This friendship was advantageous for the Jewish community and gave them a respite from the oppressive laws enacted against them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart
    The Gallic Empire (260-274): Rome Breaks Apart Six Silver Coins Collection An empire fractures Roman chariots All coins in each set are protected in an archival capsule and beautifully displayed in a mahogany-like box. The box set is accompanied with a story card, certificate of authenticity, and a black gift box. By the middle of the third century, the Roman Empire began to show signs of collapse. A parade of emperors took the throne, mostly from the ranks of the military. Years of civil war and open revolt led to an erosion of territory. In the year 260, in a battle on the Eastern front, the emperor Valerian was taken prisoner by the hated Persians. He died in captivity, and his corpse was stuffed and hung on the wall of the palace of the Persian king. Valerian’s capture threw the already-fractured empire into complete disarray. His son and co-emperor, Gallienus, was unable to quell the unrest. Charismatic generals sought to consolidate their own power, but none was as powerful, or as ambitious, as Postumus. Born in an outpost of the Empire, of common stock, Postumus rose swiftly through the ranks, eventually commanding Roman forces “among the Celts”—a territory that included modern-day France, Belgium, Holland, and England. In the aftermath of Valerian’s abduction in 260, his soldiers proclaimed Postumus emperor. Thus was born the so-called Gallic Empire. After nine years of relative peace and prosperity, Postumus was murdered by his own troops, and the Gallic Empire, which had depended on the force of his personality, began to crumble.
    [Show full text]
  • Collector's Checklist for Roman Imperial Coinage
    Liberty Coin Service Collector’s Checklist for Roman Imperial Coinage (49 BC - AD 518) The Twelve Caesars - The Julio-Claudians and the Flavians (49 BC - AD 96) Purchase Emperor Denomination Grade Date Price Julius Caesar (49-44 BC) Augustus (31 BC-AD 14) Tiberius (AD 14 - AD 37) Caligula (AD 37 - AD 41) Claudius (AD 41 - AD 54) Tiberius Nero (AD 54 - AD 68) Galba (AD 68 - AD 69) Otho (AD 69) Nero Vitellius (AD 69) Vespasian (AD 69 - AD 79) Otho Titus (AD 79 - AD 81) Domitian (AD 81 - AD 96) The Nerva-Antonine Dynasty (AD 96 - AD 192) Nerva (AD 96-AD 98) Trajan (AD 98-AD 117) Hadrian (AD 117 - AD 138) Antoninus Pius (AD 138 - AD 161) Marcus Aurelius (AD 161 - AD 180) Hadrian Lucius Verus (AD 161 - AD 169) Commodus (AD 177 - AD 192) Marcus Aurelius Years of Transition (AD 193 - AD 195) Pertinax (AD 193) Didius Julianus (AD 193) Pescennius Niger (AD 193) Clodius Albinus (AD 193- AD 195) The Severans (AD 193 - AD 235) Clodius Albinus Septimus Severus (AD 193 - AD 211) Caracalla (AD 198 - AD 217) Purchase Emperor Denomination Grade Date Price Geta (AD 209 - AD 212) Macrinus (AD 217 - AD 218) Diadumedian as Caesar (AD 217 - AD 218) Elagabalus (AD 218 - AD 222) Severus Alexander (AD 222 - AD 235) Severus The Military Emperors (AD 235 - AD 284) Alexander Maximinus (AD 235 - AD 238) Maximus Caesar (AD 235 - AD 238) Balbinus (AD 238) Maximinus Pupienus (AD 238) Gordian I (AD 238) Gordian II (AD 238) Gordian III (AD 238 - AD 244) Philip I (AD 244 - AD 249) Philip II (AD 247 - AD 249) Gordian III Trajan Decius (AD 249 - AD 251) Herennius Etruscus
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extension of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, 285-305Ce
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce Joshua Petitt University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Petitt, Joshua, "The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2412. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2412 THE EXTENSION OF IMPERIAL AUTHORITY UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY, 285-305CE. by JOSHUA EDWARD PETITT B.A. History, University of Central Florida 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2012 © 2012 Joshua Petitt ii ABSTRACT Despite a vast amount of research on Late Antiquity, little attention has been paid to certain figures that prove to be influential during this time. The focus of historians on Constantine I, the first Roman Emperor to allegedly convert to Christianity, has often come at the cost of ignoring Constantine's predecessor, Diocletian, sometimes known as the "Second Father of the Roman Empire". The success of Constantine's empire has often been attributed to the work and reforms of Diocletian, but there have been very few studies of the man beyond simple biography.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Over “Those Outside”: Imperial Diplomacy and the Boundaries of Constantine’S Christianity Alexander Angelov
    Bishop over “Those Outside”: Imperial Diplomacy and the Boundaries of Constantine’s Christianity Alexander Angelov ROUND THE TIME of the Council of Nicaea in 325, the emperor Constantine invited several close friends and Abishops to dinner. It was in the comfort of good food and a private circle that Constantine shared his own idea on what a Christian emperor should actually be. “You are bishops of those within the Church, but I am perhaps a bishop ap- pointed by God over those outside”:1 these were Constantine’s words as recorded by Eusebius of Caesarea, who insisted that he had overheard them in person. Interested in Constantine’s own imagined role in Christian- ity, scholars have often commented on the emperor’s private statement. We usually find the imperial remark blended into discussions on Constantine’s piety and his long-term agenda to convert the world to Christianity and to rule as ‘Christ’s vicegerent on Earth’.2 We also see it evoked in discussions on 1 Eus. Vit.Const. 4.24, ed. Winkelmann: ἔνθεν εἰκότως αὐτὸς ἐν ἑστιάσει ποτὲ δεξιούµενος ἐπισκόπους λόγον ἀφῆκεν, ὡς ἄρα καὶ αὐτὸς εἴη ἐπίσκο- πος, ὧδέ πη αὐτοῖς εἰπὼν ῥήµασιν ἐφ’ ἡµετέραις ἀκοαῖς· “ἀλλ’ ὑµεῖς µὲν τῶν εἴσω τῆς ἐκκλησίας, ἐγὼ δὲ τῶν ἐκτὸς ὑπὸ θεοῦ καθεσταµένος ἐπί- σκοπος ἂν εἴην”; translations of Averil Cameron and Stuart G. Hall, Life of Constantine (Oxford 1999), sometimes modified. 2 For one scholarly example (among many) depicting Constantine as God’s representative on earth see Johannes A. Straub, “Constantine as ΚΟΙΝΟΣ ΕΠΙΣΚΟΠΟΣ: Tradition and Innovation in the Representation of the First Christian Emperor’s Majesty,” DOP 21 (1967) 51–52.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Millennium
    The Roman Millennium Written by Frank L. Holt Photographs courtesy of Frank L. Holt Collection The earnest crowds that gathered across Christian Europe 1000 years ago for "Y1K" were not the first to mark such an occasion; nor were we the second to do so on January 1, 2000. The original millennial celebration in western calendrical history reverberated across the Roman Empire in "Anno ML AUC"—otherwise known as the year AD 248, according to the later Gregorian calendar, which calculated from the birth of Jesus rather than the founding of rome. Like "Y2K" today, the Roman millennium celebration in 248 was extensive and bureaucratic, laden with official messages of inspiration and private hopes for human progress, but it took place in a world that, to its inhabitants, was far more insecure than ours, and it was masterminded by an emperor of unlikely heritage. Marcus Julius Philippus, who was known as "Philip the Arab," hailed from Arabia Trachonitis, now part of Syria. This, and the fact of his humble birth, brought him scorn from Roman aristocrats who believed, however illogically, that such provinces were inhabited solely by bandits. In fact, we know that Philip and his brother, Caius Julius Priscus, were sons of one Julius Marinus, and they were born in Shahba, a town that still exists today 100 kilometers (62 mi) east of the Sea of Galilee, and which, after Philip's accession, was renamed Philippopolis. Philip was born about 204, in the years of the Severan emperors, and both boys witnessed the growing autocracy and militarism of the Roman Empire as its rulers struggled to meet new dangers.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine and Episcopal Banishment: Continuity and Change in the Settlement of Christian Disputes Eric Fournier
    Constantine and Episcopal Banishment: Continuity and Change in the Settlement of Christian Disputes Eric Fournier To cite this version: Eric Fournier. Constantine and Episcopal Banishment: Continuity and Change in the Settlement of Christian Disputes. Hillner, Julia; Enberg, Jakob; Ulrich, Jörg. Clerical Exile in Late Antiquity, Peter Lang, pp.47-65, 2016, Early Christianity in the Context of Antiquity, 17, 978-3-631-69427-5. hal-02572753 HAL Id: hal-02572753 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02572753 Submitted on 13 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Éric Fournier1 Constantine and Episcopal Banishment: Continuity and Change in the Settlement of Christian Disputes Abstract: Constantine’s use of clerical banishment followed precedents in respecting their immunity to physical coercion. It also deferred to bishops to adjudicate their own disputes, through councils, which lacked means to enforce their decisions. Exile was thus the optional civil enforcement of counciliar decisions and the harshest sentence Constantine was willing to use against bishops. Upon winning both of his civil wars against imperial rivals presented as ‘per- secutors’, Maxentius in 312 and Licinius in 324, one of Constantine’s first actions was to recall bishops exiled during their alleged persecutions.2 In this context, exile was understood as a persecutory measure against Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman 'Soldatenkaiser' on the Triumphal Rock Reliefs of Shāpūr I – a Reassessment
    HISTORIA I ŚWIAT, nr 4 (2015) ISSN 2299-2464 Ehsan SHAVAREBI (University of Tehran, Iran) Roman ‘Soldatenkaiser’ on the Triumphal Rock Reliefs of Shāpūr I – A Reassessment Keywords: Shāpūr I, Sasanian rock reliefs, Gordian III, Philip the Arab, Valerian, Uranius Antoninus, Bishāpūr, Dārābgerd Shāpūr I’s triumphal rock reliefs at Dārābgerd (Fig. 1), Naqsh-e Rostam VI (Fig. 2), Bishāpūr I (Fig. 3), Bishāpūr II (Fig. 4) and Bishāpūr III (Fig. 5) are the most significant iconographic evidence commemorating his victories over the Roman Empire. These have been very well studied and interpreted by many scholars during the past century in the light of both oriental and occidental literary sources. There are three Roman personages depicted on these reliefs who are signified as three Emperors of the Roman Soldatenkaiserzeit (235–284/5).1 The corpse of a beardless Roman is lying beneath the horse of Shāpūr on the three reliefs at Bishāpūr and the Dārābgerd relief. Another Roman is kneeling or approaching before the horse of Shāpūr on all these reliefs. The third Roman is absent on Bishāpūr I. He is standing on foot beside Shāpūr’s horse on Bishāpūr II and III. The principal scene on these two reliefs is surrounded by additional registers depicting equestrian Iranians behind the King of Kings and the foreigners bearing gifts, perhaps, before him – Bishāpūr II includes two registers and Bishāpūr III five registers. On Naqsh-e Rostam VI and Dārābgerd, the third Roman stands before Shāpūr’s horse. In Naqsh-e Rostam, Shāpūr grasps his wrists above the horse’s head. In Dārābgerd, however, Shāpūr stretches his arm toward the Roman’s head.
    [Show full text]
  • This Remarkable Collection of Genuine Coins
    This remarkable collection of genuine coins traces the history of the Empire from the late second through the fourth centuries, a period of tumult and uncertainty, when emperors came and went, almost none of them dying of natural causes. The Roman Empire was the greatest the world had ever known. Its dominions stretched from Britain to Persia, from the Maghreb to Northern Europe, and encompassed every inch of shoreline along the great Mediterranean Sea. While Rome endured for centuries, establishing a system of colonization and administration that is still copied today, the Empire was always on the brink of collapse. Indeed, the definitive history of Rome, Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, covers the period from 98 through 1590 CE. In other words, Rome’s decline and fall lasted for almost 15 centuries! This remarkable collection of genuine bronze coins traces the history of the Empire from the late second through the fourth centuries, a period of tumult and uncertainty, when emperors came and went, almost none of them dying of natural causes. Indeed, the entire history of the Roman Empire is revealed in its coinage. Coins were the newspapers of their day, used not only to exchange for goods and services, but to share information. The portraits, legends, and reverse iconographies describe the adoration of the emperors and their heirs and families, and communicate imperial agendas in the realms of politics, religion, domestic life and the military. All of this history is handed down to us on these ancient coins. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Ludi Saeculares from the Republic to Empire
    Roman Ludi Saeculares from the Republic to Empire by Susan Christine Bilynskyj Dunning A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto © Susan Christine Bilynskyj Dunning 2016 Roman Ludi Saeculares from the Republic to Empire Susan Christine Bilynskyj Dunning Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2016 Abstract This dissertation provides the first comprehensive analysis of the Roman Ludi Saeculares, or “Saecular Games”, from their mythic founding in the sixth century bce until their final celebration in 248 ce. The Ludi Saeculares were a series of religious celebrations held at Rome every saeculum (“age”, “generation”), an interval of 100 or 110 years. The argument contains two major threads: an analysis of the origins and development of the Ludi Saeculares themselves, and the use of the term saeculum in imperial rhetoric in literary, epigraphic, and numismatic sources from early Republic to the fifth century ce. First, an investigation into Republican sacrifices that constitute part of the lineage of the Ludi Saeculares reveals that these rites were in origin called “Ludi Tarentini”, and were a Valerian gentilician cult that came under civic supervision in 249 bce. Next, it is shown that in his Saecular Games of 17 bce, Augustus appropriated the central rites of the Valerian cult, transforming them into “Ludi Saeculares” through a new association with the concept of the saeculum, and thereby asserting his role as restorer of the Republic and founder of a new age. The argument then turns to the development of saeculum rhetoric throughout the imperial period, intertwined with the history of the Ludi Saeculares.
    [Show full text]