DOCSLIB.ORG

M, DE PART ME NT of HUMAN SERVICES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M, DE PART ME NT of HUMAN SERVICES DE PART ME NT OF m, HUMAN SERVICES Minnesota Department of Human Services Acting Commissioner Chuck Johnson Post Office Box 64998 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0998 Representative Matt Dean, Chair Health and Human Services Finance Committee 401 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 February 27, 2018 Dear Rep. Matt Dean, I am writing to express concerns with HF2725, a bill that would repeal MNsure and create a new county­ based eligibility determination system for Medical Assistance (MA) and MinnesotaCare. This system would replace the Minnesota Eligibility Technology System (METS) and MAXIS and require counties to administer MinnesotaCare. The bill also establishes an information technology steering committee to direct development of the new system. The goal and impact of the bill is unclear as it is currently written. We are still assessing the potential unintended effects and disruptions this bill will create for our stakeholders, partners and the individuals we serve. Below are some of our preliminary concerns. OHS is designated as the single state agency required to administer and oversee the Medicaid (Medical Assistance) program. OHS ensures compliance with federal eligibility rules and establishes processes and procedures to ensure Minnesotans are able to enroll. The bill is unclear about how Medical Assistance and MinnesotaCare eligibility will be assessed and determined and how authority would be .divided between OHS, counties and the commissioner of Revenue. It is unlikely the federal government would approve of such a structure. It is also unclear how we would transition from METS to the new proposed system, or how the resources currently devoted to METS would impact the county-developed system. METS is an integrated eligibility and enrollment system that provides functionality for Medical Assistance, MinnesotaCare and the individual market. The bill's attempt to reconfigure eligibility functionality does not change the underlying functions and resources required to operate a fully integrated system to meet federal and state requirements. A non-integrated eligibility and enrollment system will greatly impact the experiences of mixed-eligibility households, putting seamless service out of reach by shifting case management to multiple entities. We are also concerned that the bill does not address other important functions performed by MNsure, notably navigator support and community outreach grants. These resources have been vital to people in need of health care coverage, including public program enrollees. 1 We would be happy to meet with you to discuss our concerns and identify any technical assistance we could provide. Please feel free to contact Matt Burdick, Legislative Director for the Health Care Administration, at 651-431-4858 if you would like to meet and further discuss this bill. Acting Commissioner Memo Date: March 19, 2018 To: Senator Michelle Fischbach and Rep. Sarah Anderson CC: Senators Julie Rosen, Jeff Hayden and Tony Lourey Representatives Ron Kresha and Rena Moran From: Jennifer Sommerfeld, Legislative Director Children and Family Services, Department of Human Services Christopher Orr, Legislative Director Operations, Department of Human Services Re: SF 3228/HF 3454 – Relative Foster Care Licensing and Child Protection Pilot Projects The Child Safety and Permanency and Licensing divisions at the Department of Human Services have carefully reviewed this proposed legislation and have significant concerns. Our concerns include, but are not limited to the following: • While we know that relatives experience barriers to completing the foster care licensing process, and agree that we should work to eliminate barriers that unnecessarily delay the process, data has not been reviewed to identify the reasons for those barriers and how existing processes are or are not used to overcome them. • The proposal does not authorize the department and pilot counties to work together to amend the background study process or specify how the relative foster parents will be assisted in navigating the process. • The pilot will have statewide implications, unless it is limited to cases where pilot counties are responsible for both the foster care placement and licensing the relative caregiver. • The proposal narrowly defines how the pilot will be considered successful, and does so without considering the permanency or well-being outcomes for the child. The proposal also does not provide for any of the evaluation necessary to measure impact of the proposal that will require funding. • The counties that participate in the pilot must agree that a foster child will not be placed with a relative who has a permanent bar. The bill as drafted does not include this provision. • The State’s Title IV-E Plan includes the background study process. The state must consult with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to determine if a waiver is necessary to implement a pilot. • Northstar Care for Children includes a federal, state and local share in the cost, the proposal requires a fiscal note to consider the implications. Without a waiver to the State Plan’s Guardianship Assistance Program, it is likely the children in the pilot will not be eligible for federal reimbursement, and placement expenditures would need to be made up by the state and county. • The pilot will require an evaluative design and data analysis/case review and staff to conduct the evaluation and write a summary evaluative report to be provided to the Legislature. We have additional concerns with this legislation and are happy to discuss them with you in person. At the Senate hearing on Monday, March 19, we do not intend to testify on this bill. Instead, we would prefer to continue the dialogue we began with Hennepin County staff last week, and expand it to include the legislation’s authors. It is our hope that we can address our concerns and amend the bill to support careful consideration of this important issue. March 19, 2018 Representative Sarah Anderson Representative Sheldon Johnson Chair, State Government Finance Committee DFL Lead, State Government Finance Committee 583 State Office Building 259 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St Paul, MN 55155 St Paul, MN 55155 Dear Chair Anderson and Representative Johnson: Thank you for your letter requesting information about the impact on the Department of Revenue if the legislature were to not act in response to the 2017 Federal Tax Law. Below, you will find a description of the resources needed to assist taxpayers and update our systems under this scenario. 2017 Federal Tax Law effects on Minnesota The 2017 Federal Tax Law is the biggest revision of federal tax laws since 1986. The law – enacted December 22, 2017 – changes federal taxable income (FTI) in many ways for individuals, businesses, and nonprofit organizations. These changes affect tax filing in Minnesota because FTI is the starting point to calculate Minnesota taxable income. If Minnesota does not respond to the federal tax law changes, Minnesotans will be affected by a more complex filing system. Before the 2017 Federal Tax Law, Minnesota’s definition of net income largely matched the federal definition of taxable income, which simplifies filing for Minnesota taxpayers. The more closely we match federal taxable income, the fewer forms, schedules, special instructions, and calculations are needed to file a state return. The federal tax code often changes from one year to the next, and Minnesota has generally updated its tax code to match most or all of those changes. However, the 2017 Federal Tax Law changed far more provisions of the federal tax code – in more substantial ways and across more tax types – than we have seen in recent years. The 2017 Federal Tax Law did not substantially affect tax year 2017 for the current filing season.1 But, absent any changes in state tax law, returns filed next year will be drastically affected. Before making the “usual” adjustments to get their Minnesota taxable income, state taxpayers will need to make many new adjustments to account for the differences between the 2017 and 2016 definition of FTI. 1 On February 9, Congress passed the federal Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. This legislation provided tax relief for disaster victims and renewed a number of individual and business tax benefits for tax year 2017. Minnesota would need to pass legislation to conform to these provisions. The extended provisions are similar to what Congress has passed in previous years; Minnesota has conformed to parts of the package in prior years. 600 N. Robert St., St. Paul, MN 55146 An equal opportunity employer www.revenue.state.mn.us This material is available in alternate formats. The department will work to ensure the most efficient and effective filing system for our customers. Our goal is to continue to provide excellent service to all of our customers, and to ensure we maintain our current service levels, including: Informing our customers through outreach and education Answering customer questions by phone, email, letter, and in-person Developing and maintaining technology systems to file and pay Processing tax returns and issuing refunds Auditing an appropriate number of returns to encourage compliance and collect taxes owed Responding to taxpayer appeals in a timely manner However, if there is no law to respond to the federal changes, there will be complexity for individuals, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that the department cannot mitigate, as outlined in the following sections. Individual Income Tax Impacts of Not Responding The Department of Revenue serves 2.9 million Individual Income Tax customers each year. Of these: 56% rely on professional tax preparers who use tax preparation software 31% file their own returns using tax software 11% file their own returns on paper 2% use professional tax preparers who file on paper The 2017 Federal Tax Law will affect virtually all of our customers – taxpayers, tax preparers, and tax software providers – and will have a significant impact on the department and the ways we serve them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amicus Brief of the National Conference of State Legislators, Even Though the State Itself Did Not Make That Argument); Kansas V
    Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. _______________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA _______________________ BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF MINNESOTA LEGISLATORS AND NORTH CAROLINA LEGISLATIVE LEADERS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS _______________________ REBEKAH N. PLOWMAN HANS F. BADER NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY Counsel of Record AND SCARBOROUGH COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE Atlantic Station, 201 17th Street INSTITUTE Atlanta, GA 30363 1899 L Street, NW, 12th Floor (404) 322-6111 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 331-2278 NOAH H. HUFFSTETLER, III hbader@cei.org NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY COUNSEL FOR AMICI CURIAE AND SCARBOROUGH GlenLake One, Suite 200 4140 Parklake Avenue Raleigh, NC 27612 State of Florida, et al. v. US Department of Health & Human Services, et al. Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 RULE 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26.1 and 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1, amici make the following disclosure: each amicus joining in this brief is a government official. None has a parent corporation, subsidiary, or affiliate, and none has issued shares or debt securities to the public. As a result, no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of the stock of any of the amici. Counsel certifies that he believes that the Certificate of Interested Persons filed by Appellees is complete, with the following additions of the amici curiae represented in this brief, and their attorneys: The Amici Curiae represented in this brief: Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 State Relations Summary
    SESSION SUMMARY 2018 2018 STATE RELATIONS SESSION SUMMARY The 2018 Legislative Session convened on February 20, The legislature passed a bonding bill in the final with Republicans continuing to hold a majority in the moments of session, and the governor signed the bill House and Senate following two special elections. This into law; however, no agreement was reached between year also marked DFLer Mark Dayton’s last legislative the legislature and the governor on the supplemental session as governor; he will not seek re-election this fall. budget. As a result, the governor vetoed the legislature’s omnibus supplemental budget bill a few days after the Typically, the legislature focuses on capital investment constitutionally mandated adjournment date of May 21. projects in even numbered years. The House and Senate The governor also vetoed an omnibus tax bill designed capital investment committees conducted many tours to conform Minnesota’s tax system to newly enacted tax last summer and fall of proposed bonding projects reforms on the federal level. throughout the state. Additionally, the Budget and Economic Forecast projected a $329 million surplus, All Minnesota House seats are up for election this and the governor, Senate, and House pursued a November, and Minnesotans will also elect a new supplemental budget bill. governor. Several members of the House and Senate have announced their intentions to retire or pursue other The University of Minnesota submitted both a capital elected offices. The legislature is scheduled to convene request and a supplemental budget request to the state. for the 91st legislative session on January 8, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Literacy Roundtable Report 2012
    Financial Literacy Roundtable Report 2012 2012 Financial Literacy Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter to Governor Mark Dayton 3 Introduction 5 Proclamation 7 Financial Literacy Month Overview 8 Financial Literacy Month Outreach Calendar 10 Letter of Invitation from Commissioner Mike Rothman 11 Roundtable Participants 12 Summary of Discussion & Recommendations 17 Volunteerism and Public-Private Partnerships 17 Financial Literacy for Seniors & People with Disabilities 19 Asset Building and the Unbanked 20 Know Before You Owe: Loans & Credit 22 Cultural Competent Financial Literacy Needs and Opportunities 23 Financial Literacy Core Competencies: What Minnesota Consumers need for Financial Empowerment 23 Fraud & Financial Abuse Prevention 25 Action Steps 26 Appendix Minnesota Financial Literacy Interagency Workgroup 28 Examples of Financial Literacy Month Outreach Events Hit a Homerun for Financial Literacy Flyer 31 Predatory Lending Town Hall Forum Flyer 32 Mall Walk against Senior Fraud Flyer 33 Second Annual Financial Literacy Roundtable News Release 34 Second Annual Financial Literacy Roundtable Flyer 37 2 2012 Financial Literacy Report December 31, 2012 Governor Mark Dayton 130 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Dayton: Thank you for declaring the month of April 2012 to be Financial Literacy Month in Minnesota. This first ever declaration underscores the importance of life-long learning in all stages of life, including budgeting and understanding credit, responsible borrowing, planning for retirement and consumer protection for all Minnesotans. During the first year of your term, I convened the first Financial Literacy Roundtable in April 2011 to identify what is already being done to improve financial literacy in Minnesota; pinpoint what stakeholders in the government; nonprofit, and private sectors can do together to achieve tangible progress; and gather suggestions for how the Minnesota Department of Commerce can contribute to the cause of financial literacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota House of Representatives Seating Chart
    The Minnesota House of Representatives House Leadership Seat Paul Thissen ........................................... 139 Minnesota House of Representatives Public Information Services, 651-296-2146 or 800-657-3550 Speaker of the House District Room* 296- Seat Erin Murphy ........................................... 102 60B Kahn, Phyllis (DFL) ............365 ....... 4257 ....... 97 Majority Leader 21A Kelly, Tim (R) ......................335 ....... 8635 ....... 12 53B Kieffer, Andrea (R) ..............213 ....... 1147 ....... 43 Minnetonka—44B Kurt Daudt ............................................... 23 Shoreview—42B Murdock—17A Jason Isaacson John Benson 1B Kiel, Debra (R) ....................337 ....... 5091 ....... 30 Andrew Falk Seat 124 Seat 135 Minority Leader Seat 129 9B Kresha, Ron (R) ...................329 ....... 4247 ....... 53 Seat 1 Seat 6 41B Laine, Carolyn (DFL) ..........485 ....... 4331 ....... 82 Seat 11 Joe Hoppe Mayer—47A Ernie Leidiger Mary Franson Chaska—47B House Officers Alexandria—8B 47A Leidiger, Ernie (R) ...............317 ....... 4282 ......... 1 Mary Sawatzky Faribault—24B Willmar—17B Virginia—6B Albin A. Mathiowetz ....... 142 Timothy M. Johnson ....... 141 Jason Metsa 50B Lenczewski, Ann (DFL) ......509 ....... 4218 ....... 91 Seat 123 Seat 128 Seat 134 Patti Fritz Seat 139 Chief Clerk Desk Clerk Paul Thissen 66B Lesch, John (DFL) ...............537 ....... 4224 ....... 71 Patrick D. Murphy .......... 143 David G. Surdez ............. 140 Minneapolis—61B Seat 7 Seat 2 26A Liebling, Tina (DFL) ...........367 ....... 0573 ....... 90 Seat 12 Speaker of the House Kelly Tim Bob Dettmer 1st Asst. Chief Clerk Legislative Clerk Bob Barrett Lindstrom—32B Red Wing—21A Forest Lake—39A 4A Lien, Ben (DFL) ..................525 ....... 5515 ....... 86 Gail C. Romanowski ....... 144 Travis Reese ...................... 69 South St. Paul—52A Woodbury—53A Richfield—50A 2nd Asst. Chief Clerk Chief Sergeant-at-Arms Linda Slocum 43B Lillie, Leon (DFL) ...............371 ......
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance PCR Report
    Total Pages: 23 Jul 24, 2018 Campaign Finance PCR Report Filing Period: 12/31/2018 Candidate Candidate Number of Committee Name Term Date First Name Last Name Requests Lyndon R Carlson Campaign 50 Committee Lyndon Carlson Mary Murphy Volunteer Committee Mary Murphy 1 Pelowski (Gene) Volunteer Committee Gene Pelowski Jr 1 Jean Wagenius Volunteer Committee Jean Wagenius 3 Senator (John) Marty Volunteer 2 Committee John Marty Ron Erhardt Volunteer Committee Ronnie (Ron) Erhardt 1 (Tom) Hackbarth Volunteer Committee Thomas Hackbarth 5 Urdahl (Dean) Volunteer Committee Dean Urdahl 43 Volunteers for (Larry) Nornes Larry (Bud) Nornes 3 Limmer (Warren) for Senate 1 Committee Warren Limmer Volunteers for Gunther (Robert) Robert Gunther 2 Wiger (Charles) for Senate Volunteer 3 Committee Charles (Chuck) Wiger Friends of (Michelle) Fischbach Michelle Fischbach 36 Masin (Sandra) Campaign Committee Sandra Masin 5 Committee for (Sondra) Erickson Sondra Erickson 39 Marquart (Paul) Volunteer Committee Paul Marquart 27 Ann Rest for Senate Committee Ann Rest 2 Tomassoni (David) for State Senate David Tomassoni 5 Julie Rosen for State Senate Julie Rosen 1 Peppin (Joyce) Volunteer Committee Joyce Peppin 8 Mike Nelson Volunteer Committee Michael Nelson 19 Hornstein (Frank) Volunteer Committee Frank Hornstein 1 Poppe (Jeanne) for the People 45 Committee Jeanne Poppe Melissa Hortman Campaign Committee Melissa Hortman 71 Liebling (Tina) for State House Tina Liebling 13 Mahoney (Tim) for House Timothy Mahoney 5 Leslie Davis for Governor Leslie Davis 4 Garofalo
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    OFFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM PAWLENTY 130 State Capitol ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 ♦ (651) 296-0001 NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung January 6, 2010 (651) 296-0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY APPOINTS JONES TO AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION BOARD Saint Paul – Governor Tim Pawlenty today announced the appointment of Kevin M. Jones to the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board. Jones, of St. James, is the general manager of NuWay Cooperative in Trimont. He has held a number of positions with NuWay during the 15-and-a-half years he has been with the Coop. Previously, he worked in the agronomy and feed division with Watonwan Farm Service, and worked on a family farm. Jones earned an agribusiness management degree from Ridgewater College in Willmar, and is a certified crop advisor. He is a member of the Farm Bureau, Statewide Managers Association, Southern Minnesota Managers Association, Minnesota Petroleum Association, Minnesota Propane Gas Association, Cooperative Network, and Minnesota Crop Protection Retailers. Jones replaces Jeff Like on the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board as a representative of agricultural chemical retailers to complete a four-year term that expires on January 2, 2012. The Agricultural Chemical Response and Reimbursement Account (ACRRA) was created under the 1989 Minnesota Ground Water Protection Act to provide financial assistance to cleanup agricultural chemical contamination. The program is funded through annual surcharges on pesticide and fertilizer sales, and on applicator and dealer licenses. The ACRRA funds are administered by the Agricultural Chemical Response Compensation Board. The five-member board consists of representatives from the Minnesota Departments of Agriculture and Commerce, and three members appointed by the Governor, including a representative of farmers, agricultural chemical manufacturers and wholesalers, and dealers who sell agricultural chemicals at retail.
    [Show full text]
  • MSSA Services Yes
    Volume 33 Issue 6 June 2018 Monthly Publication of the Minnesota Service Station and Convenience Store Association B20 Mandate Temporary Suspension ends on June 30, 2018 The original suspension period was from MN Lottery May 21, 2018 thru June 30, 2018. Effective July 1, 2018, all diesel fuel sold or offered for Minnesota Election Update sale in Minnesota for use in internal combus- June 2018 tion engines must contain at least then per- cent (10%) biodiesel fuel oil by volume. U.S. States Pressure Automak- ers on EVs As a retailer, can I wait until July 1, 2018 to start taking deliveries of B20 again? Enbridge “Our Commitment to Minnesota” No. By July 1, 2018 all diesel fuel sold or offered for sale in Minnesota for use in internal combustion engines must again con- New Members tain twenty percent (20%) biodiesel fuel oil by volume. The tempo- rary suspension was timed to allow stations approximately two WEX Evolves Fuel Payments weeks to turn their storage tanks over after biodiesel supply is ex- from Plastic to Phone pected to return to normal production levels. •Stations should start taking deliveries of B20 before June 30, so Counteracting Declining that the diesel fuel dispensed at their pumps contains twenty percent Customer Acquisition Rates in (20%) biodiesel by volume on July 1. Auto Repair •Any fuel delivered to fleets, farms, and other end users after June, MSSA Annual Golf Outing 30th, must contain twenty percent (20%) by volume. Reminder Will the Weights & Measures Division continue to enforce the biodiesel mandate during the B20 temporary suspension? MSSA Services Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota House of Representatives Session Weekly
    SESSION WEEKLY A NONPARTISAN PUBLICATION MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES • PUBLIC INFORMATION SERVICES VOLUME 26, NUMBER 4 • JANUARY 30, 2009 ‘TOUGH DECISIONS’ T O RESOLVE BUDGE T BUDGE T ISSUE IS DÉJÀ VU FOR ONE MEMBER UNEMPLOYMEN T BENEFI T EX T ENSION NEW MEMBER PROFILES HF264 - HF410 SESSION WEEKLY Session Weekly is a nonpartisan publication of Minnesota House of Representatives Public Information Services. During the 2009-2010 Legislative Session, each issue reports House action between Thursdays of each week, lists bill introductions and provides other information. No fee. To subscribe, contact: Minnesota House of Representatives CON T EN T S Public Information Services 175 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. HIGHLIGHTS St. Paul, MN 55155-1298 Business • 5 Game & Fish • 7 Human Services • 9 651-296-2146 or 800-657-3550 or the Education • 5 Health • 7 Local Government • 9 Minnesota Relay service at 711 or 800-627-3529 (TTY) Employment • 6 Higher Education • 8 Taxes • 10 www.house.mn/hinfo/subscribesw.asp Environment • 6 Housing • 9 Notes • 10 Director Barry LaGrave Editor/Assistant Director Lee Ann Schutz BILL INTRODUCTIONS (HF264-HF410) • 17-20 Assistant Editor Mike Cook Art & Production Coordinator Paul Battaglia FEATURES Writers Kris Berggren, Nick Busse, Susan Hegarty, FIRST READING : Governor’s budget solution gets mixed reviews • 3-4 Sonja Hegman, Patty Ostberg AT ISSUE : Plugging the unemployment benefit gap • 11 Chief Photographer Tom Olmscheid AT ISSUE : Reflections of a previous budget problem • 12-13 Photographers PEO P LE : New member profiles • 14-16 Nicki Gordon, Andrew VonBank Staff Assistants RESOURCES : State and federal offices • 21-22 Christy Novak, Joan Bosard MINNESOTA INDEX : Employment or lack thereof • 24 Session Weekly (ISSN 1049-8176) is published weekly during the legislative session by Minnesota House of Representatives Public Information Services, 175 State Office Building, 100 Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • AMSD Member Districts Minnesota House of Representatives 2017 1
    AMSD Member Districts Minnesota House of Representatives 2017 House School District District Legislator Twitter Facebook Anoka-Hennepin 31A Kurt Daudt @kdaudt http://www.facebook.com/KDaudtMN 31B Cal (Calvin) K. Bahr @calbahrsd31 https://www.facebook.com/Bahrforhouse/ 34A Joyce Peppin @JoycePeppin http://www.facebook.com/joycepeppin 35A Abigail Whelan @abigailWhelan https://www.facebook.com/WhelanforHouse 35B Peggy Scott N/A https://www.facebook.com/PeggyScottForMNHouse 36A Mark Uglem N/A http://www.facebook.com/repmarkuglem 36B Melissa Hortman @melissahortman https://www.facebook.com/MelissaHortman 37A Erin Koegel @erinma14 https://www.facebook.com/erinformn 37B Nolan West N/A https://www.facebook.com/NolanWestforMinnesota 38A Linda Runbeck @lindacrunbeck http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linda-Runbeck-for-MN-House/113284255359047 40B Debra Hilstrom @debrahilstrom http://www.facebook.com/debra.hilstrom 41A Connie Bernardy @conniebernardy https://www.facebook.com/RepConnieBernardy/ Bloomington 49B Paul Rosenthal @PaulRosenthalMN http://www.facebook.com/citizensforrosenthal 50A Linda Slocum N/A https://www.facebook.com/linda.slocum.79 50B Andrew Carlson N/A https://www.facebook.com/ElectAndrewCarlson/ Brooklyn Center 40B Debra Hilstrom @debrahilstrom http://www.facebook.com/debra.hilstrom Burnsville-Eagan-Savage 51A Sandra A. Masin @Masin4Rep https://www.facebook.com/pages/Sandra-Masin/120752178235 51B Laurie Halverson @LaurieHalverson http://www.facebook.com/pages/Representative-Laurie-Halverson/415376705222306 55A Bob Loonan @BobLoonan https://www.facebook.com/BobLoonanforHouse
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Failed Experiment with Choice-Based Integration Margaret C
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 3 Article 2 2009 A Missed Opportunity: Minnesota's Failed Experiment with Choice-based Integration Margaret C. Hobday Geneva Finn Myron Orfield Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Hobday, Margaret C.; Finn, Geneva; and Orfield, Myron (2009) "A Missed Opportunity: Minnesota's Failed Experiment with Choice- based Integration," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 35: Iss. 3, Article 2. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol35/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact sean.felhofer@mitchellhamline.edu. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Hobday et al.: A Missed Opportunity: Minnesota's Failed Experiment with Choice-b A MISSED OPPORTUNITY: MINNESOTA’S FAILED EXPERIMENT WITH CHOICE-BASED INTEGRATION Margaret C. Hobday,† Geneva Finn,†† and Myron Orfield††† I. STATES HAVE A COMPELLING INTEREST IN ADDRESSING RACIAL ISOLATION IN K-12 EDUCATION ................................ 941 A. The Supreme Court’s Decision in Parents Involved ........... 941 B. Demonstrated Benefits of Racially Integrated Schools ........... 944 II. MINNESOTA’S CHOICE-BASED INTEGRATION RULES ............. 946 A. Minnesota’s Commitment to Racially Integrated Schools ..... 946 B. Minnesota’s Current Rules ................................................ 947 C. Under the Rules, Minnesota Schools Resegregate ................. 949 III. A BRIEF HISTORY OF MINNESOTA’S CHOICE-BASED RULES ... 951 A. Minnesota Seeks to Address Growing Racial Isolation in Its Schools ......................................................................... 952 B. Roundtable Discussion Group Began Working on Mandatory Desegregation Rules ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • News & Insights Recapping the Minnesota Political Scene
    News & Insights Recapping the Minnesota Political Scene Alert 09.13.2017 Governor's Veto Upheld by the Minnesota Supreme Court The 2017 Minnesota legislature remains in limbo after the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld Governor Dayton's line-item veto of the legislature's budget in retaliation for Republican's effort to defund the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Both the House and Senate Republican caucuses filed a lawsuit over the governor's action this past June. The action was precipitated by a provision contained in this year's omnibus tax bill that contained a "poison pill" provision that Dayton claimed left him no alternative but to sign the tax bill. The tax bill contained numerous tax cuts supported by the legislature's Republican majorities which were vehemently opposed by Dayton. In retaliation, Dayton vetoed the legislature's budget. The high court upheld Dayton's action but ordered the two sides to agree to the appointment of a mediator to resolve their differences. Although the opinion supported Dayton's line-item action, the high court clearly was not happy with the practical effect of one branch of government creating such an imbalance of power by taking away another branch's funding. Dayton and Republican leaders each immediately issued statements declaring victory and agreeing to go to mediation to resolve their issues. Agreeing to a mediator will be the first test as to whether the two sides can even reach the negotiating table. It is unlikely House and Senate Republicans are going to agree to what Dayton wants: a rollback of the tax cuts already signed into law.
    [Show full text]
  • Majority Leader Lawrence Pogemiller Governor Tim Pawlenty
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 09 - 0432 REpORT OF THE MINNESOTA SENATE AUTISM TASK FORCE Submitted to Majority Leader Lawrence Pogemiller and Governor Tim Pawlenty Cc: Senator David H. Senjem - Minority Leader & Autism Task Force Senator Terri E. Bonoff- Autism Task Force Margaret Anderson Kelliher - Speaker ofthe House March 2009 MINNESOTA SENATE AUTISM TASK FORCE MARCH 13, 2009 Lawrence J. Pogemiller Timothy J. Pawlenty Maj ority Leader Office ofthe Governor Minnesota State Senate 130 State Capitol 235 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Majority Leader Pogemiller and Governor Pawlenty, I am pleased to submit to each ofyou the initial report ofthe Minnesota Senate Autism Task Force adopted by a voice vote on May 17, 2008 [S.R. 176-ChiefAuthor Senator David H. Senjem] in the 2007-2008 Legislation Session. [Senate Resolution Copied]. It was the sense ofthe Senate ofthe State ofMinnesota that an autism task force be established to study and make recommendations to the Legislature regarding the growing incidence ofautism and ways to improve the delivery and coordination ofautism services in the state. This task force soon realized that the scope ofwork was greater than what could be accomplished within the time allotted. The task force first met on October 7, th 2008 and took on a rigorous schedule, meeting bi-weekly thereafter until March 11 , 2009.
    [Show full text]