DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report And Annual Report & Accounts: 2019–2020 HC 553 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 (For the year ended 31 March 2020) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 16 July 2020 HC 553 2 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available on our website at: www.gov.uk/government/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Finance Directorate, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-2047-5 CCS0120001876 07/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Designed in-house by the FCO Communication Directorate CORRECTION SLIP Title: Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts Session: 2019/20 HC 553 ISBN: 978-1-5286-2047-5 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 16 July 2020 Correction: 1. Page 25: Text currently reads: We used £26m of this to give extra grant funding to the British Council, to help mitigate the financial impact of Covid-19. This meant that the FCO fully funded the costs of the Council’s overseas network in 2019-20, avoiding the need for the Council to cross-subsidise from its commercial operations. Text should read: We used £26m of this to give extra grant funding to the British Council, to help mitigate the financial impact of Covid-19. This meant that the FCO fully funded the grant related costs of the Council’s overseas network in 2019-20, avoiding the need for the Council to cross-subsidise from its commercial operations. 2. Page 46: This correction slip replaces an error made in the “Senior Management—Single total figure of remuneration” table. Text in 4th column from the left: Jonathan Sinclair Pension benefits 2019-20 (£’000 to the nearest £1000) currently reads: 336 Text should read: 36 3 Contents Performance Report ................................................................................................................ 4 Performance Overview ........................................................................................................ 4 Foreword by the Foreign Secretary ........................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary—Permanent Under-Secretary .................................................................... 6 Who we are and what we do .................................................................................................. 8 Our Objectives in 2019–20 ....................................................................................................... 9 Performance Analysis ........................................................................................................ 10 Protect our people ................................................................................................................. 10 Project our influence and demonstrate diplomatic leadership ................................................. 12 Promote our prosperity .......................................................................................................... 16 International platform ............................................................................................................ 18 Engaging with Parliament ...................................................................................................... 19 Engaging with the Devolved Nations ...................................................................................... 19 Investing in our people .......................................................................................................... 20 Accountability Report ............................................................................................................ 22 Corporate Governance Report ............................................................................................... 34 Remuneration and Staff Report ..............................................................................................44 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Report ....................................................................... 56 Accounts ............................................................................................................................... 66 Annex: Core Tables (unaudited) ........................................................................................... 102 4 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2017–20182019–20 Performance Report Performance Overview This section assesses the department’s performance in the last financial year from the perspective of the Foreign Secretary and Permanent Under-Secretary, and provides an overview of the FCO’s global network, objectives and single departmental plan. Foreword by the Foreign Secretary The Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP I write this as the coronavirus pandemic has dramatically altered the global landscape. The response has been an unprecedented challenge, and there will be long-standing ramifications, in every country around the world. Throughout the crisis, I am proud to say that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has operated with integrity and ingenuity. Work on the response is ongoing, and this report does not cover the FCO’s total response. But the organisation has played a vital role in the UK fight against the coronavirus pandemic. From the outset, we deployed our diplomatic network right around the world, to source and buy ventilators and billions of items of protective equipment for the NHS frontline. At the same time, we’ve worked with other governments and the airlines to keep commercial routes open, helping well over one million British travellers return home. And we have deployed charter flights to bring home tens of thousands more, prioritising our most vulnerable citizens. This was achieved while receiving a record number of calls to our contact centres at ten times the usual volume, making more changes to our travel advice and answering more letters than we would normally do in an entire year. Along with our focus on procurement and repatriation, the UK has led the international response. As the biggest donor to the global fund to find a coronavirus vaccine, the UK has played a vital role in the development of diagnostics, treatments “With a foreign policy that will and vaccines. We have pledged a total of £744m of serve the citizens of this country, UK Aid to stop the spread of Covid-19, find a vaccine and save lives around the world, including in the UK. we will continue to lead the way This crisis has also shown that necessity is the on the world stage, as partners of mother of invention. Our international response to choice in trade and security, and the pandemic was a cross-government effort that not only demonstrated the benefits of integration, as a global force for good.” it shone a light on the potential for us to go even further. The Prime Minister announced last 5 The Foreign Secretary with Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General, at the Meeting of NATO Ministers of Foreign Affairs, November 2019 Covid-19 Press Conference, March 2020 month that the Department for Outside of the EU, we already Global Britain is a force for good in International Development and hold historic trading partnerships. the world. Our guiding lights, have the Foreign and Commonwealth But we now have the potential always been— and will always be— Office will merge to become the to do more. As we think about the values of democracy, human rights new Foreign, Commonwealth broadening our horizons, the UK and the international rule of law. and Development Office. will be seeking to embrace the Climate change poses an enormous huge opportunities in the rising Beginning on 1 September, we will global challenge. The UK will continue economies of the future. Earlier this place our world-class aid programme to take responsible leadership to year, we re-committed to launching at the beating heart of our foreign push forward a green recovery. As negotiations on ambitious Free Trade policy decision making. We will we look ahead to hosting COP26 in Agreements between a number of integrate the development expertise Glasgow in November 2021, we are high-priority countries, including of DfID with the diplomatic muscle determined to achieve a step change the United States and Australia. of the Foreign Office, ensuring in the international response. that our impact abroad is bigger Meanwhile, vital national security On human rights, we will continue than the sum of its parts. work persists. In December, we hosted to defend media freedoms and the NATO Leaders Meeting here in For example, at the GAVI vaccine protect freedom of religion. In London to celebrate 70 years of the summit, which the Prime Minister order to hold human rights abusers most successful Alliance in history. recently hosted, we smashed the and violators to account, we have target for vaccine funding, with US$8.8 We have continued to hold Iran
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter to Home Secretary.Pdf
    62 Britton Street London EC1M 5UY United Kingdom Phone +44 (0)20 3422 4321 www.privacyinternational.org Rt Hon Sajid Javid MP Home Secretary Home Office 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF Sent by email: [email protected] CC: Investigatory Powers Tribunal 25 September 2018 Dear Sajid Javid We are writing to express our grave concern and to request your urgent action following today's disclosures regarding the interception of data by the Security and Intelligence Agencies (SIA), including their alarming acquisition and retention of data relating to Privacy International and/or its employees. Privacy International (PI) is a registered charity based in London that works at the intersection of modern technologies and rights. Privacy International challenges overreaching state and corporate surveillance, so that people everywhere can have greater security and freedom through greater personal privacy. Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs et al. As you will be aware, in June 2015 PI commenced a challenge at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal against the Foreign Secretary, the Home Secretary and the SIA regarding the acquisition, use, retention, disclosure, storage and deletion of 'Bulk Personal Datasets' (BPDs) and Bulk Communications Data (BCDs). These databases and datasets contain vast amounts of personal data about individuals, the majority of whom are unlikely to be of intelligence interest. For example, BPDs held by the SIA include passport databases, travel data, and finance-related activity of individuals, while BCDs (the "who, when, where, and how" of both telephone and internet use) include location information and call data for everyone's mobile telephones in the UK for 1 year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Erosion of Parliamentary Government
    The Erosion of Parliamentary Government JOHN MAJOR CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES 57 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL 2003 THE AUTHOR THE RT HON JOHN MAJOR CH was Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from 1990 to 1997, having previously served as Foreign Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer. He was a Conservative Member of Parliament for Huntingdon from 1979 to 2001. Since leaving politics, he has returned to business in the private sector. He also lectures around the world and is active in many charities. The aim of the Centre for Policy Studies is to develop and promote policies that provide freedom and encouragement for individuals to pursue the aspirations they have for themselves and their families, within the security and obligations of a stable and law-abiding nation. The views expressed in our publications are, however, the sole responsibility of the authors. Contributions are chosen for their value in informing public debate and should not be taken as representing a corporate view of the CPS or of its Directors. The CPS values its independence and does not carry on activities with the intention of affecting public support for any registered political party or for candidates at election, or to influence voters in a referendum. ISBN No. 1 903219 62 0 Centre for Policy Studies, October 2003 Printed by The Chameleon Press, 5 – 25 Burr Road, London SW18 CONTENTS Prologue 1. The Decline of Democracy 1 2. The Decline of Parliament 3 3. The Politicisation of the Civil Service 9 4. The Manipulation of Government Information 12 5.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Convention Against Corruption
    United Nations Convention against Corruption Self-assessment Name: UK Second Cycle Review-20180108-134632 Country: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Date of creation: 24/11/2017 Assessor: Renny Mendoza Assessor Position: International Policy Advisor: Joint Anti-Corruption Unit Release: 3.0.0.15 Comments: Completed self-assessment checklists should be sent to: Corruption and Economic Crime Section Division for Treaty Affairs United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna International Centre PO Box 500 1400 Vienna, Austria Attn: KAMBERSKA Natasha Telephone: + (43) (1) 26060-4293 Telefax: + (43) (1) 26060-74293 E-mail: [email protected] A. General information A. General information 1. General information 1519 1 Focal point: Renny Mendoza 2 Institutions consulted: Home Office, Crown Prosecution Service, Serious Fraud Office, National Crime Agency, Her Majesty’s Treasury, Ministry of Justice, Financial Conduct Authority, HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Department for International Development. 3 Please provide information on the ratification/acceptance/approval/accession process of the United Nations Convention against Corruption in your country (date of ratification/acceptance/approval of/accession to the Convention, date of entry into force of the Convention in your country, procedure to be followed for ratification/acceptance/approval of/accession to international conventions etc.). UNCAC Ratification Signature date: 9 December 2003 Ratification date: 9 February 2006 Entry into force date: 11 March 2006 Procedure to be followed for ratification of international conventions: The United Kingdom (UK) is a ‘dualist’ state. The UK constitution accords no special status to treaties: rights and obligations created by treaties have no effect in UK law unless legislation is in force to give effect to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)
    Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) Lord Justice Rix, Justice Forbes First Instance application for judicial review 14 December 2004 JUDGMENT Lord Justice Rix: 1 This is the judgment of the court to which both members have contributed. Introduction 2 The claimants in these proceedings are all relatives of deceased Iraqi civilians ("the deceased"), who have been killed by or in the course of action taken by British soldiers in the period following completion of major combat operations in Iraq and prior to the assumption of authority by the Iraqi Interim Government (i.e. the period 1 May 2003 to 28 June 2004). The defendant is the Secretary of State for Defence ("the Secretary of State"). 3 This judgment is concerned with the determination of two preliminary issues (as to which, see paragraphs 5 and 6 below) arising out of the claimants' application for judicial review of the Secretary of State's alleged failure and/or refusal: (i) to conduct independent inquiries into the deaths of the deceased, (ii) to accept liability for those deaths and (iii) to pay just satisfaction. 4 Stated in general terms, the claimants' application for judicial review concerns the legal responsibilities of the Secretary of State under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") in relation to the civilian deaths in question. It is the claimants' case (as originally pleaded) that the Secretary of State acted in breach of section 6 of the HRA, in particular by his violation of the procedural obligations under article 2 (the right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention"), in failing and/or refusing to conduct independent inquiries into the deaths of the various deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 26 June 2020 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government led by Boris Johnson and key ministerial appointments for our sector after the December 2019 General Election and February 2020 Cabinet reshuffle. Following the Conservative Party’s compelling victory, the Government now holds a majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. The life sciences sector is high on the Government’s agenda and Boris Johnson has pledged to make the UK “the leading global hub for life sciences after Brexit”. With its strong majority, the Government has the power to enact the policies supportive of the sector in the Conservatives 2019 Manifesto. All in all, this indicates a positive outlook for life sciences during this Government’s tenure. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministers and policy maker profiles................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities relevant to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced. Department Position Holder Relevant responsibility Holder in
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • UNA Mag July-Sep 2007.Qxp
    NEWWORLD News and comment on the United Nations and UNA–UK On track or derailed? Progress towards the UN Millennium Development Goals PLUS: Justice not Vengeance It’s time to ditch the death penalty 2007 Review of UN Peace Operations Page 14 War and Democratic Accountability Page 20 UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE UK 3 Whitehall Court, London SW1A 2EL The UN Human Rights Council Page 22 www.una.org.uk Cartooning for Peace Page 35 £3.00 July–September 2007 Global Warming and the WI Page 38 UNA-UK CONTENTS Letter from the Executive Director 3 UNAUK Directory 4 UN: Miscellany 5 070707: the MDG Halfway Point 6 2007 Review of UN Peace Operations 14 UNAUK in Parliament 17 Annual Conference 2007 18 Waging War and Democratic Accountability 20 The UN Human Rights Council 22 It’s Time to Ditch the Death Penalty 26 The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations 29 Cartooning for Peace 35 UNA Westminster Pays Tribute to Peacekeepers 36 The Women’s Institute Tackles Waste 38 The Membership at Work 39 What’s On? 40 Books on the UN 41 Web Resources and Letters 42 Young Professionals Network 43 Newer World 46 MDGs Progress Chart 48 New World Subscription: is published by UNA-UK, 3 Whitehall Court, London SW1A 2EL Copies of New World are included in the membership fee for UNA-UK. www.una.org.uk Design: Advertisements: John Schwartz, [email protected] To advertise please call Veronica Lie on 020 7766 3451. The United Nations Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ISSN: a company limited by guarantee (registered no.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Resolutions: Sri Lanka QSD on 5 February 2019
    UN Resolutions: Sri Lanka QSD on 5 February 2019 This briefing identifies relevant reports and useful documents, including recent parliamentary materials and press articles, which may be of assistance to Members in preparing for the following debate: Lord Naseby to ask Her Majesty’s Government following the resignation of the government of the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Council where they co-sponsored with the United Kingdom the Resolution 30/1 in 2015 and Resolution 34/1 in 2017, and given the progress made towards many aspects highlighted in the resolutions, what assessment they have made of whether to annul or withdraw those resolutions. Copies of the materials are available for collection from the Library. Key Information • United Nations Human Rights Council, Resolution 30/1: Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka, 14 October 2015; and Resolution 34/1: Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka, 3 April 2017 Resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council which outlines a process for the promotion of reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka, with a further resolution which reaffirms 30/1 and outlines developments made since. • Foreign and Commonwealth Office, ‘Boris Johnson: US Human Rights Council Withdrawal Regrettable’, 19 June 2018; House of Commons, ‘Written Question: Sri Lanka: Human Rights’, 23 October 2018, 179260; and House of Commons, ‘Written Question: Sri Lanka: Human Rights’, 14 January 2019, 205365 Comments by former Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, on the US’ withdrawal from the Human Rights Council. Additionally, questions focusing on what actions the Government is taking to assist the implementation of resolutions 30/1 and 34/1 are included, with responses from Mark Field, Minister of State for Asia and the Pacific at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]