DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Colville, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Colville, Washington ◊ ◊ CITY OF COLVILLE ◊ ◊ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Periodic Update – 2011 FACT SHEET Title: City of Colville Comprehensive Plan Purpose: The Comprehensive Plan Growth Management Plan was adopted in November 1997 to comply with RCW 36.70, 36.70A, 36.70B, and 36.70C. New legislation, ESSB 6427, adopted in 2006, provided a three-year extension of the due date for comprehensive plan updates for small and slow growing counties and cities; extending the deadline for Colville to the end of 2010. In 2010, the City Council chose to provide additional forums for public participation through 2011. This document provides community goals into 2030, using population figures from the Office of Financial Management‘s April 2011 report. Proponents: City of Colville Lead Agency: City of Colville Responsible Official: Mr. Jim Lapinski, Director of Building & Planning City of Colville 170 South Oak Colville, Washington 99114 Authors/Contributors: City of Colville Staff: Building & Planning, Engineering, Park, Recreation, Street, and Municipal Services Departments. Public Workshops: Multiple workshops were held in the summer and fall of 2009 to allow for ample opportunity for public participation. Each element was presented as proposed by staff, and changes to these elements were made based on input received from the general public and affected agencies. Each revised component was again presented to the Planning Commission, published and opened for public comments at their regular meetings, during the spring and summer of 2010. Time and Place of Public Hearings: Public hearings were held before the Planning Commission in November 2010 and City Council in December 2010. In 2010, the City Council chose to provide a forum for additional public participation through a series of public hearings held from February through July 2011. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4 A. Community History ................................................................................................ 4 B. Population, Household, and Employment Trends .................................................. 5 C. The Planning Process ........................................................................................... 7 D. Relationship to State and Federal Laws ................................................................ 8 1. Growth Management Act ........................................................................... 8 2. Shoreline Management Act ........................................................................ 9 3. Regulatory Reform Act (ESHB 1724) ......................................................... 9 4. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)...................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Land Use Element ............................................................................................ 10 A. Introduction and Background ............................................................................... 10 B. Land Use Districts and Standards ....................................................................... 11 C. Physical Setting .................................................................................................. 13 D. Critical Areas ...................................................................................................... 14 E. Resource Lands .................................................................................................. 16 F. Existing Development Patterns ............................................................................ 17 G. Growth Projections and Development Assumptions ............................................ 18 H. Goals & Objectives ............................................................................................. 19 Chapter 3: Capital Facilities & Utilities Element ................................................................. 22 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 22 B. Statutory Requirements ....................................................................................... 23 C. Relationships of Various Plans ............................................................................ 24 D. General Descriptions, Financial Information, and Forecasting ............................. 25 1. Airport ...................................................................................................... 26 2. Fire Department ....................................................................................... 28 3. City Hall ................................................................................................... 30 4. Law Enforcement ..................................................................................... 31 5. Library ...................................................................................................... 33 6. Park and Recreation ................................................................................ 35 7. Water System .......................................................................................... 37 8. Wastewater Services ............................................................................... 40 9. Solid Waste Collection and Disposal ........................................................ 42 10. Stormwater Management Facilities ........................................................ 42 11. Streets ................................................................................................... 43 12. Animal Control ....................................................................................... 44 13. Schools .................................................................................................. 45 14. Energy ................................................................................................... 46 15. Telecommunications .............................................................................. 46 E. Financial Capability ............................................................................................. 46 1. Revenues ................................................................................................. 46 2. Expenditures ............................................................................................ 48 3. Long-Term Debt ....................................................................................... 50 F. Setting Priorities .................................................................................................. 51 G. Ranking Capital Improvements ........................................................................... 53 H. Implementation ................................................................................................... 54 I. Goals & Objectives .............................................................................................. 54 Chapter 4: Housing Element ............................................................................................. 57 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 57 B. Existing Need and Future Demand...................................................................... 57 C. Goals & Objectives ............................................................................................. 60 D. Implementation and Financing ............................................................................ 61 Chapter 5: Transportation Element ................................................................................... 64 A. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 64 B. Vision .................................................................................................................. 64 C. Transportation System Inventory ........................................................................ 65 1. Roadway Facilities ................................................................................... 65 2. Non-Motorized Transportation .................................................................. 68 3. Public Transportation ............................................................................... 72 4. Rail Transportation ................................................................................... 72 5. Water Transportation ............................................................................... 73 6. Air Transportation .................................................................................... 73 7. Electric and Hybrid Vehicles ..................................................................... 73 D. Level of Service (LOS) Standards ....................................................................... 74 E. Current Levels of Service .................................................................................... 76 1. Peak Hour Traffic Patterns ....................................................................... 77 2. Truck Traffic ............................................................................................. 78 3. Accident Analysis ..................................................................................... 79 F. Future Transportation Conditions ........................................................................ 80 G. Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kettle Falls, a Reader 1 S Commentary on a Site On
    • WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, p 0 Box 84, UNIVERSITY STATION, SEATTLE 98/05 NEWSLETTER Volume XIV, Number 1 APRIL, 1970 • CONTENTS: KETTLE FALLS, A READER 1 S COMMENTARY ON A SITE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER••o•o••o•o••••••••••o••••••••Don Miles THE SALVAGE OF EXPOSED CULTURAL MATERIAL AND A BISON MOLAR FROM CHINA BEND.o •• as related by Pauline Crane THE CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE •• ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL -1- This issue of the ARCHAEOLOGIST concentrates on the northeast part of the State of Washington, particularly on the region around K,ettle Fa.lls and the Colville River Valley. KETTLE FALLS, A READER'S COMMENTARY ON A SITE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER by Don Miles is a plea for consequent action during the next low-water period of the Columbia . }>ehind Grand Coulee Dam. This will probably take place in 1973. May -was a lost .. opportunity for archaeology since only the relic hunters and collectors came in numbers. Archaeologists visiting the site seem to have produced little; certainly no excavatiou of even a salvage nature was done. Being under the jurisdiction of -the Federal Government through the National Parks Division, Lake Roosevelt is out­ of•bounds for any but authorized persons to excavate. The status of surface collectors is unclear, but -usually in t he absence· of authority collectors tend to do as they please. The responsibility of investigating and reclaiming any archae­ ological material rests with the govenment or ·its agent. In the absence of any action the crisis between the professional and the amateur persists. The emergency nature of the 1973 exposure of old sites demands planning, action, and the coopera­ tion of professional and amateur in reclaiming as much as possible from important sites along the Upper Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Water Systems: an Historical Retrospect of Control, Domination and Change
    OKANAGAN WATER SYSTEMS: AN HISTORICAL RETROSPECT OF CONTROL, DOMINATION AND CHANGE by MARLOWE SAM B.A., The University of British Columbia - Okanagan, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Interdisciplinary Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Okanagan) September 2008 © Marlowe Sam, 2008 Abstract In this study, I examine the history of colonial control, domination, and change that began in the Interior Plateau region of British Columbia in 1811 when interaction between the Syilx (Okanagan) and European explorers first occurred. I focus on water use practices in particular, employing an indigenous Syilx approach (En’owkinwixw) in order to display the negative impacts of colonial policies on the Syilx and their environment. The En’owkinwixw methodology, which calls for the incorporation of multiple perspectives, is thousands of years old, but has been modified here from its original consensus-based decision-making process. The manner in which the U.S. government developed resource and water management policies in America’s arid Far West directly influenced the models that were later adopted by British Columbia and Canada. U.S. Supreme Court decisions along with a number of international treaties and trade agreements between the United States and Canada have also compromised the ability of the Syilx to maintain a sustainable and harmonious relationship with their environment. Depression era policies in the United States led to the implementation of large-scale projects such as the damming of the Columbia River that had further negative consequences on the environment of the Interior Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Desautel (Sinixt)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: R. v. Desautel, 2017 BCSC 2389 Date: 20171228 Docket: 23646 Registry: Nelson Between: Regina Appellant And Richard Lee Desautel Respondent And Okanagan Nation Alliance Intervenor On appeal from: Provincial Court of British Columbia, March 27, 2017 R. v. DeSautel, 2017 BCPC 84, Nelson Registry No. 23646 Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Sewell Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: G. Thompson H. Cochran Counsel for the Respondent: M. Underhill K. Phipps Counsel for the Intervenor: R. Kyle Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Nelson, B.C. September 6-8, 2017 Place and Date of Judgment: Nelson, B.C. December 28, 2017 R. v. Desautel Page 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 Position of the Parties ............................................................................................. 4 Background .............................................................................................................. 4 Grounds of Appeal ................................................................................................... 6 Are the Sinixt an aboriginal people of Canada ...................................................... 7 What is the Relevant Aboriginal Collective? ....................................................... 10 The Intervenor’s Submissions .............................................................................. 12 Discussion of Crown’s Submissions ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pinkney Lugenbeel
    PINKNEY LUGENBEEL THIS PLACE IS ROMANTIC AND WILD An Historic Overview of the Cascades Area, Fort Cascades, and the Cascade Townsite, Washington Territory. THIS PLACE IS ROMANTIC AND WILD: AN HISTORICAL OWVERVIEW OF THE CASCADES AREA, FORT CASCADES, AND THE CASCADES TOWNSITE, WASHINGTON TERRITORY By Stephen Dow Beckham Report to Portland District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers under Contract No. DACW57-c-0083 Heritage Research Assococites 2393 Emerald Street Eugene, Oregon 97403 April 10, 1984 Heritage Research Associates Report No. 27 Pinkney Lugenbeel — Page 2 Pinkney Lugenbeel —Page 3 The Upper Blockhouse (Fort Lugenbeel) occupied a prominent position over the small civilian community at the Upper Landing. (courtesy Oregon Historical Society) UPPER BLOCKHOUSE (FORT LUGENBEEL) The Upper Blockhouse, also known as Fort Lugenbeel, stood at the Upper Landing in Section 37, T.2N., R7E. The structure was located atop a hill overlooking the small islands at the head of the portage along the north bank of the Columbia River. The site was first used for military purposes when in 1847, during the Cayuse Indian War, volunteer soldiers established Fort Gilliam at the Upper Landing. Also known as The Cabins, these crude buildings sheltered troops and supplies destined for service in the conflicts farther to the east. (Victor 1894:157-158). During the outbreak of the Indians in March, 1856, the military had no garrison at this site. Civilians forted up in the Bradford store while the Indians burned many of the pioneer buildings scattered about the area. By June 17, 1856, however, the Army had moved in with determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Allan T. Scholz Papers Regional History 1965 Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America Dietrich Treide Leipzig University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/scholz Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Treide, Dietrich, "Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America" (1965). Allan T. Scholz Papers. 1. https://dc.ewu.edu/scholz/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Regional History at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Allan T. Scholz Papers by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Publication of the Leipzig Museum of Ethnography: Issue 14 Die Organisierung des indianischen Lachsfangs im westlichen Nordamerika [Organization of Indian Salmon Fishing in Western North America] By: Dietrich Treide Akademie-Verlag Berlin 1965 [Copyright owned by: State Ethnographic Collections Saxony (SES)/State Art Collections Dresden (SKD). Permission was granted by the copyright owner for placement of this German to English translation of Treide’s dissertation on the Eastern Washington University, JFK Library, Digital Commons Website] Translation by: Jaimie Kenney Department of Entomology University of California, Riverside Riverside, California 92521 Foreword by: Allan T. Scholz, Ph.D. Eastern Washington University Department of Biology 258 Science Building Cheney, WA
    [Show full text]
  • Steptoe Battlefield State Park Washington State Parks Things to Remember Heritage Site S
    Steptoe Battlefield State Park Washington State Parks Things to remember Heritage Site S. Summit Loop • Park hours – 6:30 a.m. to dusk. Rosalia, WA 99170 • Winter schedule – 8 a.m. to dusk. Although (509) 337-6457 most parks are open year round, some parks or Steptoe portions of parks are closed State Parks information: during the winter. For (360) 902-8844 a winter schedule Reservations: Online at Battlefield and information about seasonal www.parks.state.wa.us or call closures, visit (888) CAMPOUT or (888) 226-7688 www.parks.state.wa.us Other state parks located in State Park Heritage Site or call the information the general area: center at Riverside, Steptoe Butte and (360) 902-8844. Mount Spokane • Wildlife, plants and all park buildings, signs, tables and other structures are protected; removal or damage of any kind is prohibited. Hunting, feeding of wildlife Connect with us on social media and gathering firewood on state park property is prohibited. www.twitter.com/WAStatePks • Pets must be on leash and under physical control at all times. This includes trail areas and campsites. Pet owners www.facebook.com/WashingtonStateParks must clean up after pets on all state park lands. www.youtube.com/WashingtonStateParks Share your stories and photos: Adventure Awaits.com S Sample If you would like to support Washington State The Discover Pass is required for day visits to state parksS Sample Parks even more, please consider making a and access to other state-managed recreation lands. The 2018 donation when renewing your license plate tabs. You also may place a check in a donation box pass provides access to millions of acres of parks, wildlife 2017 when youSample visit state parks.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATIVE of BENJAMIN Macdonald* in the Early 90'S I
    NARRATIVE OF BENJAMIN MAcDONALD* In the early 90's I received a letter from Donald MacDonald, a son of the cousin of Benjamin MacDonald, Angus MacDonald, in which letter he stated that my half brother Ranald MacDonald left a box containing documents, papers and manuscripts with a man1 living about twelve miles from Spokane, Washington, but some time ago I lost this letter and cannot now recollect the name of the man with whom the box of papers, etc., was left by Ranald MacDonald. Possibly by making inquiry of Donald MacDonald, whose address now is Dixon, a station on the Northern Pacific Railroad in Western Montana, you may be able to ascertain the name and location of the party who has the box in question and which was supposed to contain manuscripts of Ranald MacDonald's life, experiences, etc. Mr. Donald MacDonald wrote me that he had made an effort to get possession of this box but was unable to do so, the man claiming that he had to show proper authority therefor before he would let him have the property in question, and thereupon Donald MacDonald wrote the aforesaid letter to me in regard thereto. I was at that time living in Denver, Colorado. My father, Archibald MacDonald, was born in Glencoe, 2 Argyllshire, Scotland, on the 12th day of September, 1790 , and died at St. Andrews, Province Quebec, in the Dominion of Canada, on the 15th day of January, 1853. On the 12th day of September, 1823, Archibald MacDonald was married to Princess Sunday, a daughter of Chief Cumcumly, at Astoria, Oregon, and as the fruits of this marriage there was born but one child, my half brother, Ranald MacDonald.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac I. Stevens, George B. Mcclellan and the Cascade Mountains Route Columbia Magazine, Winter 1989-90: Vol
    The Young Napoleons: Isaac I. Stevens, George B. McClellan and the Cascade Mountains Route Columbia Magazine, Winter 1989-90: Vol. 3, No. 4 By Kent D. Richards The United States in the middle third of the nineteenth century was an ideal time to be alive for a young man of intelligence, energy and ambition. These were characteristics shared by a goodly number of Americans, but few could claim a greater portion of talents than Isaac I. Stevens and George B. McClellan. Each was undoubtedly ambitious, intelligent and energetic. It is equally certain that each had an ego that could negate their more positive characteristics. This combination of great talent and flawed character led contemporaries to label each as a "Young Napoleon." McClellan and Stevens were the products of well-to-do families. The former was born in Pennsylvania in 1826, the son of a prominent surgeon and teacher. Stevens, born eight years earlier in North Andover, Massachusetts, descended from a long line of prosperous farmers and mill owners. Both distinguished themselves at the United States Military Academy which, in the 1830s and 1840s, was beginning to make its mark as a training ground for military engineers. Stevens graduated first in a class of 31 in 1839 and McClellan second of 59 in 1846. Both were tested in the crucible of the Mexican War where they served with the command of General Winfield Scott on his march from Vera Cruz to Mexico City. The young lieutenants' peers included Robert E. Lee and P. G. T. Beauregard in a distinguished cadre that won numerous brevets (honorary advances in rank) and the praise of the commanding general.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrows of Time: Narrating the Past and Present," Wish to Thank Everyone Who Submitted Proposals in Response to the Call for Papers
    Introduction The organizers of this, the 39th edition of the American Indian Workshop, titled "Arrows of Time: Narrating the Past and Present," wish to thank everyone who submitted proposals in response to the call for papers. This conference has been nearly two years in the planning, and the level of interest shown by regular attendees of the AIW, as well as new participants, was encouraging. We particularly wished to highlight the historical connections –political, cultural, and academic – between the Low Countries, modern day Belgium and the Netherlands, and the Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Interest in Early Modern Indigenous interactions with the Dutch in New Amsterdam is growing, but some lesser-known intersections have recently begun to draw wider attention. For example, in 2016, Ghent played host to a popular exhibition on Father Pieter-Jan de Smet and his mission to the Americas. At the same time, the city’s football team came under fire for its use of an ‘Indian’ logo and mascots, giving rise to debate regarding its origins and appropriateness. Other connections, however, such as Margaret of Austria’s collection of artefacts from the New World kept at her court in Mechelen, or Frans Olbrecht’s fieldwork among the Eastern Cherokee, have garnered comparatively little scholarly attention. Secondly, we invited contributions that problematize the uses and notions of ‘history,’ especially with reference to present day conflicts. This a very timely subject as the contested past is increasingly coming to the fore in the contested present. For example, the Idle No More and NoDAPL movements of the last five years rely heavily on the relatively recent past in their discourses about the present, and projected/envisioned/anticipated futures.
    [Show full text]
  • COLVILE, Andrew PARISH: ENTERED SERVICE:1814 DATES:B
    NAME:COLVILE, Andrew PARISH: ENTERED SERVICE:1814 DATES:b. 1779 d. 1856 Appointments & Service Outfit Year*: Position: Post: District: HBCA Reference: *An Outfit year ran from 1 June to 31 May Andrew Colvile, (father of Eden Colvile) was born on the 6th November 1779, and in 1814 assumed by Royal License the name of Colvile in lieu of Wedderburn, his patronymic, because of the fact that his mother, Isabella, daughter of Andrew Blackburn, was great grand-niece and heir of the last Lord Colville of Ochiltree. Andrew Colvile's father, James Wedderburn of Inveresk, had previously assumed the name of Wedderburn Colvile in 1807. James Wedderburn was the third son of Sir John Wedderburn, 5th Baronet, who embraced the cause of the exiled House of Stuart and fought at Culloden as a volunteer in Lord Ogilvy's regiment. He was subsequently taken prisoner, attained and executed on Kennington Common in November 1746, when the Baronetcy of Wedderburn was forfeited. His father, Sir John Wedderburn, 4th Bart., had previously been deprived of his position as "Clerk of Dundee" because of the part he had taken in the Jacobite Rebellion of 1715. The name of Wedderburn was originally assumed from the lands and Barony of Wedderburn, CO. Berwick. To revert to Andrew Wedderburn, it must be noted in passing that his sister, Miss Jean Wedderburn-Colvile, married in November, 1807, Thomas Douglas, Fifth Earl of Selkirk, founder of the Red River Settlement - the forerunner of the existing Province of Manitoba. Wedderburn became a Proprietor of the Hudson's Bay Company in June, 1809, and at a General Court on the 17th January, 1810, was duly elected a Member of the Committee in Succession to Thomas Neave, who had disqualified.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Concerning the Estabishment of Fort Colvile Author(S): William S
    University of Washington Information concerning the Estabishment of Fort Colvile Author(s): William S. Lewis Source: The Washington Historical Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Apr., 1925), pp. 102-107 Published by: University of Washington Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40474904 Accessed: 09-12-2019 02:29 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of Washington is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Washington Historical Quarterly This content downloaded from 128.120.234.142 on Mon, 09 Dec 2019 02:29:31 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ESTABISHMENT OF FORT COLVILE* The Hudson's Bay Company's Trading Post at Kettle Falls, Washington, was named Fort Colvile presumably in honour of Mr. Andrew Colvile, who was a member of the Committee of the Hudson's Bay Company at the time the Post was established. Its beginning are indicated in the letter from Governor George Simpson dated at Columbia Forks Spokane River encampment, 10th April, 1835, and addressed to Mr. John McLoughlin, Chief Factor, who was then in charge of the Columbia District. The instructions of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Okanagan Indian Band
    Okanagan Indian Band Socio-economic Baseline FOR THE PROPOSED BC HYDRO REVELSTOKE UNIT 6 PROJECT DRAFT INTERIM REPORT FOR BC HYDRO NOVEMBER 30, 2016 Okanagan Indian Band Socio-economic Baseline for the Proposed BC Hydro Revelstoke Unit 6 Project DRAFT INTERIM REPORT FOR BC HYDRO, November 30, 2016 Prepared by The Firelight Group for and with Okanagan Indian Band Co-authored by: Karen Fediuk, Sarah Reid, and The Firelight Group with Okanagan Indian Band Peer review by Alistair MacDonald Submitted to: Fabian Alexis and Colleen Marchand, Okanagan Indian Band Territorial Stewardship Department Acknowledgements: Thank you to the Okanagan Indian Band elders, knowledge holders, staff, and leadership who contributed, and to all of the members who participated in this study. This report could not have been completed without their support and expert knowledge. Thanks also to the community project team, community leaders, technical staff, and document reviewers who helped make this project possible. In particular, we would like to acknowledge Fabian Alexis, Julie Richard, Colleen Marchand, Ruby Alexis, Joanne Alexis, Lindsay Louis, Justin Joe, and Sharnelle Paul. Firelight would like to thank the staff who contributed to this report, particularly Katie Dimmer and Jason Day, who provided research support and data management. Copyedit and graphic design: Nadene Rehnby, Hands on Publications Cover photos: Ruby Alexis Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is based on research by The Firelight Group, as well as published works and archival research, all of which was limited by available time and resources. It reflects the understanding of the authors, and is not intended to be a complete depiction of the dynamic and living systems of resource use, traditional economy, and local knowledge regarding community conditions maintained by Okanagan Indian Band members.
    [Show full text]