DOCSLIB.ORG

Fire Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fire Management Plan Lower Klamath Project FERC No. 14803 Fire Management Plan February 2021 Fire Management Plan Prepared for: Klamath River Renewal Corporation Prepared by: Renewal Corporation Technical Representative: AECOM Technical Services 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, California 94612 Seth Gentzler Shannon Leonard River Design Group 311 SW Jefferson Avenue Corvallis, Oregon 97333 Jack Zunka Scott Wright CEA Consulting 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 950 San Francisco, California 94104 Kirk Marckwald February 2021 2 Fire Management Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 9 2. Background and Overview of Fire in the Region .............................. 11 2.1 Environmental Conditions and Fire History .................................................................................... 11 2.2 Government and Agency Fire Mitigation Planning ......................................................................... 12 2.3 Fire Risks Associated with Power Generation and Transmission ................................................. 13 3. Fire Suppression Agencies, Resources, and Considerations ......... 15 3.1 Fire Support and Services ............................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Existing Management Resources and Strategies .......................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Fire Detection .................................................................................................................. 19 3.2.2 Prevention and Preparedness ........................................................................................ 22 3.2.3 Water Sources and Access ............................................................................................. 23 4. Regulations and Requirements ......................................................... 25 4.1 Federal ............................................................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Oregon Department of Forestry Klamath-Lake District ................................................................. 26 4.3 CalFire Siskiyou Unit ........................................................................................................................ 29 5. Near-term Measures: Construction-Related Activities .................... 33 5.1 Roles and Responsibilities .............................................................................................................. 33 5.1.1 During Dam Decommissioning and Removal - Kiewit ................................................... 33 5.1.2 During Restoration and Monitoring - RES ...................................................................... 34 5.1.3 Safety Officer ................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Agency Contacts .............................................................................................................................. 38 5.3 Fire Prevention and Suppression Measures and Equipment ....................................................... 38 5.3.1 Regulations and Requirements ...................................................................................... 38 5.3.2 Standards and Best Practices ........................................................................................ 39 5.3.3 Fire Management Preparation Checklist ....................................................................... 42 6. Long-Term Fire Management Measures ........................................... 43 6.1 Term .................................................................................................................................................. 43 6.2 Objectives and Overview ................................................................................................................. 44 6.3 Conditions after Dam Removal ....................................................................................................... 44 6.4 Post-Removal Management Measures .......................................................................................... 45 February 2021 3 Fire Management Plan 6.4.1 Monitored Detection System (MDS) ............................................................................... 46 6.4.2 Chipper ............................................................................................................................. 48 6.4.3 Copco Lake Hydrant System ........................................................................................... 48 6.4.4 Dry Hydrants .................................................................................................................... 49 6.4.5 Boat Launches ................................................................................................................. 50 6.4.6 Aerial River Access Points (ARAPs) ................................................................................. 50 6.4.7 Dip Tanks ......................................................................................................................... 54 6.5 Evaluation of Post-Removal Fire Risk ............................................................................................. 55 6.5.1 Burn Probability and Risk of Ignition .............................................................................. 56 6.5.2 Firefighting Capabilities .................................................................................................. 58 7. Renewal Corporation Commitments ................................................. 63 8. Agency Consultation ........................................................................... 64 9. References ........................................................................................... 67 Appendix A – Reax Engineering, Inc., Qualitative Wildfire Risk Analysis of the Klamath River Renewal Project ....................................... 70 Appendix B – Spatial Informatics Group, Review of Reax Analysis .... 126 Appendix C – Agency Approval Letters .................................................. 128 List of Tables Table 3-1. Fire protection agencies in the ASE area, updated table from BOR & CDFG (2012). ...................... 15 Table 3-2. Fire services in the analysis area. ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 3-3. Comparison of common firefighting helicopters................................................................................. 24 Table 4-1. 2019 ODF fire season minimum requirements (ODF, 2019). ........................................................... 26 Table 4-2. Fire precautionary measures required by California Public Resources Code (PRC) and applicable during any times of the year when burning permits are required unless otherwise stated. ............................................................................................................................. 29 Table 5-1. Kiewit primary leads for fire protection and control. .......................................................................... 34 Table 5-2. RES leads for fire protection and control. ........................................................................................... 35 Table 5-3. Fire management preparation checklist for the Contractors............................................................. 42 Table 6-1. Miles of transmission and distribution lines removed by the Proposed Action (Renewal Corporation Technical Representatives, 2018)............................................................................. 45 Table 6-2. Post-removal ground access points as shown in Figure 9. ................................................................ 50 Table 6-3. Change in modeled burn probability within ASE area from pre-restoration to post- restoration fuels. ............................................................................................................................. 56 Table 6-4. Percentage of ASE area (568.9 mi2) covered from Reax viewshed analysis .................................... 59 Table 6-5. Results for mean burn probability from Reax’s wildfire spread modeling ........................................ 60 Table 8-1. Agency personnel consulted during development of the Fire Management Plan. ........................... 64 February 2021 4 Fire Management Plan List of Figures Figure 1. Aerial Suppression Extent (ASE) in the Klamath Basin. ....................................................................... 10 Figure 2. Map of fire hazard in the Klamath River basin generated using MODIS by the USFS. Figure from BOR & CDFG (2012). .............................................................................................................. 12 Figure 3. Fire threat map of the Klamath Basin showing California Public Utilities Commission fire threat tier data. ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 4. Land ownership around the analysis area. Figure from BOR & CDFG (2012).................................... 16 Figure 5. Map of hospitals, fire stations, and major fire routes near the Klamath Dams. From BOR & CDFG (2012). Note, Klamath Falls Interagency Fire Center is now an air
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gao-13-684, Wildland Fire Management
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters August 2013 WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT Improvements Needed in Information, Collaboration, and Planning to Enhance Federal Fire Aviation Program Success GAO-13-684 August 2013 WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT Improvements Needed in Information, Collaboration, and Planning to Enhance Federal Fire Aviation Program Success Highlights of GAO-13-684, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Forest Service and Interior The Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service and the Department of the contract for aircraft to perform various Interior have undertaken nine major efforts since 1995 to identify the number and firefighting functions, including type of firefighting aircraft they need, but those efforts—consisting of major airtankers that drop retardant. The studies and strategy documents—have been hampered by limited information Forest Service contracts for large and collaboration. Specifically, the studies and strategy documents did not airtankers and certain other aircraft, incorporate information on the performance and effectiveness of firefighting while Interior contracts for smaller aircraft, primarily because neither agency collected such data. While government airtankers and water scoopers. reports have long called for the Forest Service and Interior to collect aircraft However, a decrease in the number of performance information, neither agency did so until 2012 when the Forest large airtankers, from 44 in 2002 to 8 in Service began a data collection effort. However, the Forest Service has collected early 2013—due to aging planes and several fatal crashes—has led to limited data on large airtankers and no other aircraft, and Interior has not initiated concerns about the agencies’ ability to a data collection effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Cub Creek 2 Fire Evening Update July 17, 2021 Evening Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest
    Cub Creek 2 Fire Evening Update July 17, 2021 Evening Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Fire Information Line – (541)-670-0812 (8:00 am to 8:00 pm) Winthrop, WA — Cub Creek 2 – Extended attack of the Cub Creek 2 Fire continued today with retardant drops from large air tankers, water scooping/dropping planes, helicopters with buckets and various ground forces of hand crews and engines. The fire burned vigorously throughout the day on Washington Department of Natural Resource and Okanogan County Fire District 6 protected lands and also the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. The majority of the left flank of the fire is lined with dozer line from the heel of the fire to First Creek Road which ties into Forest Road 140 leading to Buck Lake. The north flank remains unchecked at this time. The northeast flank is backing down toward West Chewuch Road where it had crossed north of the junction of the East and West Chewuch Road to Heaton Homestead. The fire is also located east of Boulder Creek Road and is burning towards the north being pushed by diurnal winds. Northwest Incident Management Team 8 assumed management of the fire this evening at 6 p.m. Tonight, a night shift of firefighters include a 20-person handcrew, five engines, and multiple overhead. The Washington State structure strike team has been reassigned to protect properties in the Cub Creek 2 Fire. 8 Mile Ranch is the designated staging area. Evacuation Information: The Okanogan County Emergency Management (OCEM) evacuations for the Chewuch River drainage effected by the Cub Creek 2 Fire remain.
    [Show full text]
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Fire Crisis Mitigation
    FIRE-IN FIre and REscue Innovation Network Thematic Working Group Vegetation Fires EC 20171127 1 | F IRE-IN has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement N°740 575 Main Activities Objective main lines: (i) Identification and harmonisation of operational Improve the National capability gaps and European Fire & (ii) Scouting of Rescue Capability promising Development solutions Process (iii) Definition of a Fire & Rescue Strategic Research and Standardisation Agenda | 2 Conceptual Pillars | 3 5 Thematic Working Groups + involvement of Associated Experts A. Search and Rescue B. Structural fires C. Vegetation fires D. Natural disasters E. CBRNE (SAR) and emergency CNVVF GFMC THW CAFO Medical Response ENSOSP, CAFO, SGSP, CFS, PCF, MSB, KEMEA MSB, CNVVF, CFS, KEMEA ENSOSP, SGSP, CFS, MSB KEMEA, CNVVF SAFE, ENSOSP, CNVVF, FIRE-IN CAFO Associated Experts (AE) community (international community including key thematic practitioner experts from public, private, NGOs bodies, and representative of thematic working groups from existing networks) 1000 experts expected | 4 Thematic Group C – Vegetation / Landscape Fires Partners - Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) (lead) - Catalonian Fire Service - Pau Costa Foundation - Int. Ass. Fire & Rescue Services (CTIF) - KEMEA - European Associated Experts and thematic networks and other stakeholders (community of practitioners) | Thematic Group C – Vegetation / Landscape Fires Emphasis - Science-Policy-Interface - Underlying causes of landscape
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Caldor Fire Incident Update
    CALDOR FIRE z INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 9/9/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. Information Line: (530) 303-2455 @CALFIREAEU @CALFIRE_AEU @EldoradoNF Media Line: (530) 806-3212 Incident Websites: www.fire.ca.gov/current_incidents @CALFIREAEU https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/7801/ @EldoradoNF Email Updates (sign-up): https://tinyurl.com/CaldorEmailList El Dorado County Evacuation Map: https://tinyurl.com/EDSOEvacMap INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: August 14, 2021 Incident Start Time: 6:54 P.M. Incident Type: Wildland Fire Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: 2 miles east of Omo Ranch, 4 miles south of the community of Grizzly Flats CAL FIRE Unit: Amador – El Dorado AEU Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE AEU, USDA Forest Service – Eldorado National Forest Size: 217,946 Containment: 53% Expected Full Containment: September 27, 2021 First Responder Fatalities: 0 First Responder Injuries: 9 Civilian Fatalities: 0 Civilian Injuries: 2 Structures Threatened: 24,647 Structures Damaged: 80 Single Residences Commercial Properties Other Minor Structures 778 18 202 Destroyed: Destroyed: Destroyed: ASSIGNED RESOURCES Engines: 320 Water Tenders: 82 Helicopters: 43 Hand Crews: 59 Dozers: 52 Other: 34 Total Personnel: 4,532 Air Tankers: Numerous firefighting air tankers from throughout the state are flying fire suppression missions as conditions allow. CURRENT SITUATION WEST ZONE The fire continued to be active throughout the night. Minimal growth occurred in the Situation Summary: northeast and southern areas of the fire perimeter. Firefighters worked diligently last night picking up minor spot fires and mitigating threats to structures. Today crews will continue Incident Information: working along the southern edge to secure more control line and keep the fire north of Highway 88.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Committee Safety Gram 2018
    SAFETY GRAM 2018 Fatalities, Entrapments and Accident Summary for 2018 (http://www.nwcg.gov/committees/risk-management-committee/resources) The following data indicates the fatalities, entrapments, burnovers and fire shelter deployments during calendar year 2018. The information was collected by the Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center and verified by the NWCG Risk Management Committee. Fatalities Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 1/26 Puerto Rico Pack Test Work Capacity Test Local Government Medical 1 1 Cardiac Arrest Fatality Arduous San Juan Puerto Rico 2/28 Water Tender Accident Initial Attack Local Government Vehicle 3 1 2 injured, 1 fatality Fatality VFD New London TX 3/10 Grass Fire Fatality UNK Local Government UNK 1 1 Incident date: 3/10 Ellinger VFD (Suspected Medical) Deceased: 3/23 TX 3/12 Hazard Tree Mitigation Chainsaw Federal Medical 1 1 Fell unconscious, Fatality Operations USFS transported to Olympic NF hospital. Deceased WA 3/15 Grass Fire Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Fell ill and collapsed UNK Heart Attack on 3/16. OH Deceased: 3/16 1 Incident Name Agency/Entity Number # Date Type of Jurisdiction Activity of Personnel of Shelters Fatalities Injuries/Treatment Accident Location Involved People Deployed 4/12 Shaw Fire Initial Attack Local Government Entrapment 2 1 1 fatality; 1 FF with Cheyenne 2nd degree burns. OK 4/18 Rocky Mount Fatality Initial Attack Local Government Medical 1 1 Neck and back pain VA VFD on 4/18. Deceased: 4/19 4/21 Training Hike Fatality Fitness Training State Medical 1 1 Collapsed, treated on CA Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Accident Investigation
    Serious Accident Investigation: Factual Report and Analysis Fatality of NPS Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew Captain Brian Hughes The Ferguson Fire on the Sierra National Forest, CA, July 29, 2018 Page Intentionally Blank 1 In Memory of Brian Hughes August 1, 1984 – July 29, 2018 Captain Hughes is in the back row, left. The surviving members of the Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) have expressed sincere admiration for their fallen friend and leader. “Fortitude Vincimus” By Endurance We Conquer Arrowhead IHC motto 2 Serious Accident Investigation: Factual Report Accident: Tree Strike of National Park Service (NPS) Arrowhead Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) Captain Brian Hughes Location: Ferguson Fire, Division-G, Sierra National Forest, near Yosemite West Date: July 29, 2018 Investigation Team Team Leader: Jim Loach Title: Associate Regional Director, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Signature/ Date Deputy Team Leader: Randy Draeger Title: Regional Director of Safety, USFS, Ogden, UT Signature/ Date Chief Investigator: Don Boucher Title: Regional Structural Fire Manager, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Chief Investigator [Shadow]: Jeremy Murphy Title: Regional Chief Ranger, NPS, National Capital Region, Washington, D.C. Investigator: Lindel Gregory Title: Chief Ranger, NPS, Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Van Buren, MO 3 Investigator: Nick Armitage Title: Ranger, NPS, Grand Teton National Park, Moose, WY Investigator: Patrick Pearson Title: Chief of Fire and Aviation, NPS, Midwest Region, Omaha, NE Subject Matter Expert – Hotshot:
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire May 2020 CAL FIRE/Riverside Unit Strategic Fire Plan Page 1 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE .........................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................4 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................6 UNIT PREPAREDNESSAND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............................... 12 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM .................................................................................................................... 14 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES AT RISK ............................................................ 17 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ................................................................................. 22 SECTION IV: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ........................................................................................ 24 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY................................................... 27 INFORMATIONANDEDUCATION ................................................................... 28 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 29 SECTION V: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT TACTICS DIVISION / BATTALION / PROGRAM PLANS .................................................. 41 APPENDIX A: HIGH PRIORITY PRE‐FIRE PROJECTS .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]