DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0707.2895V1 [Astro-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0707.2895V1 [Astro-Ph] Draft version February 1, 2008 A Preprint typeset using L TEX style emulateapj v. 11/12/01 MASS-RADIUS RELATIONSHIPS FOR SOLID EXOPLANETS S. Seager1,2, M. Kuchner3, C. A. Hier-Majumder1, B. Militzer4 Draft version February 1, 2008 ABSTRACT We use new interior models of cold planets to investigate the mass-radius relationships of solid exoplan- ets, considering planets made primarily of iron, silicates, water, and carbon compounds. We find that the mass-radius relationships for cold terrestrial-mass planets of all compositions we considered follow a k3 generic functional form that is not a simple power law: log10 Rs = k1 +1/3log10(Ms) − k2Ms for up to Mp ≈ 20M⊕, where Ms and Rs are scaled mass and radius values. This functional form arises because the common building blocks of solid planets all have equations of state that are well approximated by a n modified polytrope of the form ρ = ρ0 + cP . We find that highly detailed planet interior models, including temperature structure and phase changes, are not necessary to derive solid exoplanet bulk composition from mass and radius measurements. For solid exoplanets with no substantial atmosphere we have also found that: with 5% fractional uncertainty in planet mass and radius it is possible to distinguish among planets composed predominantly of iron or silicates or water ice but not more detailed compositions; with ∼ 5% uncertainty water ice planets with & 25% water by mass may be identified; the minimum plausible planet size for a given mass is that of a pure iron planet; and carbon planet mass-radius relationships overlap with those of silicate and water planets due to similar zero-pressure densities and equations of state. We propose a definition of “super Earths” based on the clear distinction in radii between planets with significant gas envelopes and those without. Subject headings: extrasolar planets 1. introduction ner edge of its host star’s habitable zone (Udry et al. The growing number and unexpected diversity of re- 2007). Microlensing surveys have discovered two low-mass ∼ ∼ cently discovered extrasolar planets has motivated us to planets, 5.5M⊕ (Beaulieu et al. 2006) and 13M⊕ (Gould et al. 2006) at ∼ 2.5 AU from their parent stars, study the mass-radius relationship of solid exoplanets. The central question we pose is what can we determine suggesting that Neptune-mass planets are common. In one about an exoplanet’s composition from its mass and ra- planetary system, the Neptune-mass planet is the most massive planet in the system (Gould et al. 2006). dius? The answer to this question requires numerical mod- Space-based missions provide us with further motiva- els of planet interiors as well as an understanding of the 5 current limitations and future prospects of the precision of tion for our study. COROT (CNES; launched 27 De- cember 2006) and Kepler6 (NASA; launch date 2008) will planet mass and radius observations. search for low-mass exoplanets that transit their host star. The growing number of exoplanets includes some with 7 interesting radii. The planet HD 149026 b has such a small GAIA (ESA; launch date 2011) will measure stellar dis- tances (and hence their radii) precisely, removing a limit- radius for its measured mass that the planet must have a ing factor in deriving a precise planetary radius. Ground- core with a mass of 60–70 M⊕, or 2/3 of the planet’s to- based radial velocity techniques are pushing to higher pre- tal mass (Sato et al. 2005). Another planet, GJ 436b, is arXiv:0707.2895v1 [astro-ph] 19 Jul 2007 cision, and will enable mass measurements of many of the a Neptune-mass planet (Butler et al. 2004) that was re- cently discovered to show transits (Gillon et al. 2007) and COROT and Kepler planets. To examine what can we determine about an exoplanet’s to have a Neptune-like radius (M = 22.6 ± 1.9M⊕ and p composition from measurements of its mass and radius, Rp =3.95 ± 0.35R⊕). The unexpected diversity of exoplanets includes four- we derive theoretical mass-radius relationships for a wide range of exoplanet masses. To explore a wide range of teen exoplanets with M sin i< 21M⊕ (Butler et al. 2004; p masses and compositions, we make a major simplification: McArthur et al. 2004; Santos et al. 2004; Rivera et al. 2005; Bonfils et al. 2005; Vogt et al. 2005; Lovis et al. we make the approximation that the planet is at a uniform low temperature. This approximation of uniform low tem- 2006; Udry et al. 2006; Bonfils et al. 2007; Melo et al. perature serves as a practical simplification because the 2007), including one with M = 7.5M⊕ (Rivera et al. p equations of state (EOSs) are relatively well described at 2005) and another with Mp = 5M⊕ orbiting at the in- 1 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20015 2 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 54-1626, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA, 01742 3 Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics Laboratory, Code 667, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 4 Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20015 5 http://smsc.cnes.fr/COROT/ 6 http://kepler.nasa.gov/ 7 http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=26 1 2 zero-temperature or at 300 K for a wide variety of materi- and the equation of state (EOS) als below 200 GPa. The full temperature-dependent EOSs P (r)= f(ρ(r),T (r)), (3) for the materials of interest are either unknown or highly uncertain at the temperatures massive solid planets can where f is a unique function for a given material. Dif- reach in their interiors and in the pressure range beyond ferent approximations to the EOS have been derived and the reach of static compression experiments (. 200 GPa) we describe our choice in detail in §3. For the majority and the analytical high pressure laws of plasma physics of the calculations for solid materials presented here, we (& 104 GPa). neglect the temperature dependence of the EOS and use We adopt our approach from the foundational work experimental data obtained at room temperature. The of Zapolsky & Salpeter (1969) who computed mass-radius importance of thermal contributions to the pressure are relationships for homogeneous zero-temperature spheres of discussed in §4.2.2. single elements. We improve upon Zapolsky & Salpeter We numerically integrate equations (1) and (2) starting (1969) by using a more accurate EOS at pressures P . at the planet’s center (r = 0) using the inner boundary 1000 GPa. We further expand upon Zapolsky & Salpeter condition M(0) = 0 and P (0) = Pcentral, where Pcentral is (1969) by: considering more realistic planetary materials; a chosen central pressure. For the outer boundary condi- considering differentiated planets; by exploring the effects tion we use P (Rp) = 0. The choice of Pcentral at the inner of temperature on the planet mass and radius; and by in- boundary and the outer boundary condition P (Rp)= 0de- vestigating potential observational uncertainties on planet fines the planetary radius Rp and total mass Mp = m(Rp). mass and radius. Integrating equations (1) and (2) over and over for a range This work complements the highly focused physical of Pcentral provides the mass-radius relationship for a given models of low-mass exoplanets offered by other authors. EOS. A detailed study by L´eger et al. (2004) focused on water For differentiated planets containing more than one kind planets, and provided a detailed model of the interior and of material, we specify the desired fractional mass of the atmosphere of a 6 M⊕ planet with an interior composi- core and of each shell. We then integrate equations (1) and tion of: 3 M⊕ of water, 2 M⊕ of a silicate mantle and (2) as specified above, given a Pcentral and outer bound- 1 M⊕ iron and nickel core (see also Kuchner (2003) for ary condition. We switch from one material to the next a description of a water planet.) Valencia et al. (2006) where the desired fractional mass is reached, using a guess calculated the mass-radius relationship for “super Earths” of the total planet mass. Since we do not know the total and “super Mercuries” (defined in their paper to be 1–10 mass that a given integration will yield ahead of time, we M⊕ and similar composition to Earth and 1–10 Mercury generally need to iterate a few times in order to produce masses and similar composition to Mercury, respectively). a model with the desired distribution of material. Valencia et al. (2006) explore different mineral composi- We tested our code by trying to duplicate the mass- tions of the mantle and core, and investigate whether the radius curves in Zapolsky & Salpeter (1969), using their planets have solid or liquid cores and apply their model EOS (Salpeter & Zapolsky 1967). Our mass-radius curves to Gl 876d in Valencia et al. (2007b) and to degeneracies agreed with those in Zapolsky & Salpeter (1969) to within of planet interior composition in Valencia et al. (2007a). a few percent. Ehrenreich et al. (2006) model small cold exoplanets to study the microlensing planet OGLE 2005-BLG-390Lb 3. equations of state (Beaulieu et al. 2006). In the past Stevenson (1982) and An equation of state (EOS) describes the relationship more recently Fortney et al. (2007) and Sotin et al. (2007) between density, pressure, and temperature for a given have also investigated mass-radius relationships of rocky material in thermodynamic equilibrium. Because we com- and icy exoplanets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Classification System of Terrestrial Planets
    7RZDUGVD&ODVVL¿FDWLRQ6\VWHPRI7HUUHVWULDO3ODQHWV Charles H. Lineweaver and Jose A. Robles Planetary Science Institute, Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200 Australia. Abstract: The focus of extrasolar planet searches has become the detection of habitable terrestrial planets. Planetary mass and orbit have large and obvious effects on habitability. Since the chemical compositions of terrestrial planets also play an important role in habitability, we propose the creation RIDFODVVL¿FDWLRQV\VWHPIRU(DUWKOLNHSODQHWVEDVHGRQWKHDEXQGDQFHVRIHOHPHQWVPRVWLPSRUWDQW IRUKDELWDELOLW\:HGHVFULEHWKHPHWKRGRORJ\IRUWKHFUHDWLRQRIVXFKDFODVVL¿FDWLRQV\VWHPEDVHG on the observed chemical abundances of stars. Keywords: Terrestrial planet formation, Solar system, chemical composition Introduction %DFNJURXQGIRUWKH&UHDWLRQRID3ODQHW&ODVVL¿FDWLRQ6\VWHP 6FLHQWL¿FXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIDJURXSRIQHZREMHFWVEHJLQVZLWKDXVHIXOFODVVL¿FDWLRQVFKHPH)RU a century astronomers have relied on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram to classify stars according to their colour and magnitude. In the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram the Sun is seen to be part of the PDLQVHTXHQFHRIK\GURJHQEXUQLQJVWDUV$QDQDORJRXVFODVVL¿FDWLRQV\VWHPIRUSODQHWVKDV\HWWR emerge. In our Solar System we have: small rocky planets close to the Sun (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, asteroids), the gas giants (Jupiter and Saturn), then the ice giants (Uranus and Neptune) and ¿QDOO\DVZDUPRIVPDOOGLUW\VQRZEDOOV 3OXWRDQGFRPSDQ\ 7KLVUXGLPHQWDU\RUELWDOUDGLXV
    [Show full text]
  • JUICE Red Book
    ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Another Earth – Part II
    GENERAL ARTICLE The Search for Another Earth – Part II Sujan Sengupta In the first part, we discussed the various methods for the detection of planets outside the solar system known as the exoplanets. In this part, we will describe various kinds of exoplanets. The habitable planets discovered so far and the present status of our search for a habitable planet similar to the Earth will also be discussed. Sujan Sengupta is an 1. Introduction astrophysicist at Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bengaluru. He works on the The first confirmed exoplanet around a solar type of star, 51 Pe- detection, characterisation 1 gasi b was discovered in 1995 using the radial velocity method. and habitability of extra-solar Subsequently, a large number of exoplanets were discovered by planets and extra-solar this method, and a few were discovered using transit and gravi- moons. tational lensing methods. Ground-based telescopes were used for these discoveries and the search region was confined to about 300 light-years from the Earth. On December 27, 2006, the European Space Agency launched 1The movement of the star a space telescope called CoRoT (Convection, Rotation and plan- towards the observer due to etary Transits) and on March 6, 2009, NASA launched another the gravitational effect of the space telescope called Kepler2 to hunt for exoplanets. Conse- planet. See Sujan Sengupta, The Search for Another Earth, quently, the search extended to about 3000 light-years. Both Resonance, Vol.21, No.7, these telescopes used the transit method in order to detect exo- pp.641–652, 2016. planets. Although Kepler’s field of view was only 105 square de- grees along the Cygnus arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, it detected a whooping 2326 exoplanets out of a total 3493 discovered till 2Kepler Telescope has a pri- date.
    [Show full text]
  • WATER – Overview
    WATER – Overview Contents Introduction ............................1 Module Matrix ........................2 FOSS Conceptual Framework...4 Background for the Conceptual Framework in Water ................6 FOSS Components ................ 16 FOSS Instructional Design ..... 18 FOSSweb and Technology ...... 26 Universal Design for Learning ................................ 30 Working in Collaborative INTRODUCTION Groups .................................. 32 Safety in the Classroom Water is the most important substance on Earth. Water dominates and Outdoors ........................ 34 the surface of our planet, changes the face of the land, and defi nes life. These powerful pervasive ideas are introduced here. The Scheduling the Module .......... 35 Water Module provides students with experiences to explore the FOSS K–8 Scope properties of water, changes in water, interactions between water and Sequence ....................... 36 and other earth materials, and how humans use water as a natural resource. In this module, students will • Conduct surface-tension experiments. • Observe and explain the interaction between masses of water at diff erent temperatures and masses of water in liquid and solid states. • Construct a thermometer to observe that water expands as it warms and contracts as it cools. • Investigate the eff ect of surface area and air temperature on evaporation, and the eff ect of temperature on condensation. • Investigate what happens when water is poured through two earth materials—soil and gravel. • Design and construct a waterwheel and use it to lift or pull objects. • Use fi eld techniques to compare how well several soils drain. © Copyright The Regents of the University California. Not for resale, redistribution, or use other than classroom without further permission. www.fossweb.com Full Option Science System 1 WATER – Overview Module Summary Focus Questions Students investigate properties of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminsterresearch the Astrobiology Primer V2.0 Domagal-Goldman, S.D., Wright, K.E., Adamala, K., De La Rubia Leigh, A., Bond
    WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 Domagal-Goldman, S.D., Wright, K.E., Adamala, K., de la Rubia Leigh, A., Bond, J., Dartnell, L., Goldman, A.D., Lynch, K., Naud, M.-E., Paulino-Lima, I.G., Kelsi, S., Walter-Antonio, M., Abrevaya, X.C., Anderson, R., Arney, G., Atri, D., Azúa-Bustos, A., Bowman, J.S., Brazelton, W.J., Brennecka, G.A., Carns, R., Chopra, A., Colangelo-Lillis, J., Crockett, C.J., DeMarines, J., Frank, E.A., Frantz, C., de la Fuente, E., Galante, D., Glass, J., Gleeson, D., Glein, C.R., Goldblatt, C., Horak, R., Horodyskyj, L., Kaçar, B., Kereszturi, A., Knowles, E., Mayeur, P., McGlynn, S., Miguel, Y., Montgomery, M., Neish, C., Noack, L., Rugheimer, S., Stüeken, E.E., Tamez-Hidalgo, P., Walker, S.I. and Wong, T. This is a copy of the final version of an article published in Astrobiology. August 2016, 16(8): 561-653. doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460. It is available from the publisher at: https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1460 © Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman and Katherine E. Wright, et al., 2016; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuchner, M. & Seager, S., Extrasolar Carbon Planets, Arxiv:Astro-Ph
    Extrasolar Carbon Planets Marc J. Kuchner1 Princeton University Department of Astrophysical Sciences Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 S. Seager Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington DC 20015 [email protected] ABSTRACT We suggest that some extrasolar planets . 60 ML will form substantially from silicon carbide and other carbon compounds. Pulsar planets and low-mass white dwarf planets are especially good candidate members of this new class of planets, but these objects could also conceivably form around stars like the Sun. This planet-formation pathway requires only a factor of two local enhancement of the protoplanetary disk’s C/O ratio above solar, a condition that pileups of carbonaceous grains may create in ordinary protoplanetary disks. Hot, Neptune- mass carbon planets should show a significant paucity of water vapor in their spectra compared to hot planets with solar abundances. Cooler, less massive carbon planets may show hydrocarbon-rich spectra and tar-covered surfaces. The high sublimation temperatures of diamond, SiC, and other carbon compounds could protect these planets from carbon depletion at high temperatures. arXiv:astro-ph/0504214v2 2 May 2005 Subject headings: astrobiology — planets and satellites, individual (Mercury, Jupiter) — planetary systems: formation — pulsars, individual (PSR 1257+12) — white dwarfs 1. INTRODUCTION The recent discoveries of Neptune-mass extrasolar planets by the radial velocity method (Santos et al. 2004; McArthur et al. 2004; Butler et al. 2004) and the rapid development 1Hubble Fellow –2– of new technologies to study the compositions of low-mass extrasolar planets (see, e.g., the review by Kuchner & Spergel 2003) have compelled several authors to consider planets with chemistries unlike those found in the solar system (Stevenson 2004) such as water planets (Kuchner 2003; Leger et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory
    Exp Astron (2012) 34:311–353 DOI 10.1007/s10686-012-9303-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE EChO Exoplanet characterisation observatory G. Tinetti · J. P. Beaulieu · T. Henning · M. Meyer · G. Micela · I. Ribas · D. Stam · M. Swain · O. Krause · M. Ollivier · E. Pace · B. Swinyard · A. Aylward · R. van Boekel · A. Coradini · T. Encrenaz · I. Snellen · M. R. Zapatero-Osorio · J. Bouwman · J. Y-K. Cho · V. Coudé du Foresto · T. Guillot · M. Lopez-Morales · I. Mueller-Wodarg · E. Palle · F. Selsis · A. Sozzetti · P. A. R. Ade · N. Achilleos · A. Adriani · C. B. Agnor · C. Afonso · C. Allende Prieto · G. Bakos · R. J. Barber · M. Barlow · V. Batista · P. Bernath · B. Bézard · P. Bordé · L. R. Brown · A. Cassan · C. Cavarroc · A. Ciaravella · C. Cockell · A. Coustenis · C. Danielski · L. Decin · R. De Kok · O. Demangeon · P. Deroo · P. Doel · P. Drossart · L. N. Fletcher · M. Focardi · F. Forget · S. Fossey · P. Fouqué · J. Frith · M. Galand · P. Gaulme · J. I. González Hernández · O. Grasset · D. Grassi · J. L. Grenfell · M. J. Griffin · C. A. Griffith · U. Grözinger · M. Guedel · P. Guio · O. Hainaut · R. Hargreaves · P. H. Hauschildt · K. Heng · D. Heyrovsky · R. Hueso · P. Irwin · L. Kaltenegger · P. Kervella · D. Kipping · T. T. Koskinen · G. Kovács · A. La Barbera · H. Lammer · E. Lellouch · G. Leto · M. A. Lopez Valverde · M. Lopez-Puertas · C. Lovis · A. Maggio · J. P. Maillard · J. Maldonado Prado · J. B. Marquette · F. J. Martin-Torres · P. Maxted · S. Miller · S. Molinari · D. Montes · A. Moro-Martin · J. I. Moses · O. Mousis · N. Nguyen Tuong · R.
    [Show full text]
  • In-System'' Fission-Events: an Insight Into Puzzles of Exoplanets and Stars?
    universe Review “In-System” Fission-Events: An Insight into Puzzles of Exoplanets and Stars? Elizabeth P. Tito 1,* and Vadim I. Pavlov 2,* 1 Scientific Advisory Group, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2 Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, Université de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.P.T.); [email protected] (V.I.P.) Abstract: In expansion of our recent proposal that the solar system’s evolution occurred in two stages—during the first stage, the gaseous giants formed (via disk instability), and, during the second stage (caused by an encounter with a particular stellar-object leading to “in-system” fission- driven nucleogenesis), the terrestrial planets formed (via accretion)—we emphasize here that the mechanism of formation of such stellar-objects is generally universal and therefore encounters of such objects with stellar-systems may have occurred elsewhere across galaxies. If so, their aftereffects may perhaps be observed as puzzling features in the spectra of individual stars (such as idiosyncratic chemical enrichments) and/or in the structures of exoplanetary systems (such as unusually high planet densities or short orbital periods). This paper reviews and reinterprets astronomical data within the “fission-events framework”. Classification of stellar systems as “pristine” or “impacted” is offered. Keywords: exoplanets; stellar chemical compositions; nuclear fission; origin and evolution Citation: Tito, E.P.; Pavlov, V.I. “In-System” Fission-Events: An 1. Introduction Insight into Puzzles of Exoplanets As facilities and techniques for astronomical observations and analyses continue to and Stars?. Universe 2021, 7, 118. expand and gain in resolution power, their results provide increasingly detailed information https://doi.org/10.3390/universe about stellar systems, in particular, about the chemical compositions of stellar atmospheres 7050118 and structures of exoplanets.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets
    This article was originally published in Treatise on Geophysics, Second Edition, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Duffy T., Madhusudhan N. and Lee K.K.M Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets. In: Gerald Schubert (editor-in-chief) Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edition, Vol 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 149-178. Author's personal copy 2.07 Mineralogy of Super-Earth Planets T Duffy, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA N Madhusudhan, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK KKM Lee, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA ã 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2.07.1 Introduction 149 2.07.2 Overview of Super-Earths 150 2.07.2.1 What Is a Super-Earth? 150 2.07.2.2 Observations of Super-Earths 151 2.07.2.3 Interior Structure and Mass–Radius Relationships 151 2.07.2.4 Selected Super-Earths 154 2.07.2.5 Super-Earth Atmospheres 155 2.07.3 Theoretical
    [Show full text]
  • Our Earth Is the Carbon Planet, Life Planet. Carbon Enables Life
    Our Earth is The Carbon Planet, Life Planet. Carbon Enables Life Letter to the Editor & To all Honourable Members of Parliament Carbon is the universe’s fourth most abundant element after hydrogen, helium, oxygen. It’s one of the least abundant elements in Earth's crust. Carbon has three main forms: - Diamond - among hardest materials - Graphite - soft - Amorphous - non-crystalline, powdery. Carbon forms more compounds than any other element - almost ten million organic compounds, a tiny fraction of its possible compounds. Carbon is the chemical basis of all known life and present in all known life forms. Trees, animals, bacteria… Life on Earth was possible because of carbon, evolved with carbon and depends on carbon. In human bodies, after oxygen, carbon is the second most abundant element - 18.5%. Life cycles: carbon is the key component in biology, many vital processes such as photosynthesis and bodily processes (breathing, digestion) Carbon occurs naturally throughout the atmosphere, crust, oceans and life forms. Humans depend on carbon for food, energy, shelter, transport. The IPCC and governments falsely frame carbon as black pollution using: - language - ‘emissions’, ‘carbon pollution’, ‘fugitive emissions’; - costly, useless bureaucratic measurement ingraining carbon as pollution; - tax; - glossy advertisements misrepresenting carbon using sinister black animations and footage of third world industry; - schools indoctrinating children. Carbon is natural, essential and ‘green’. Carbon dioxide is invisible. We’re carbon. We need carbon. Carbon is not humanity’s enemy. It’s ‘a girl’s best friend’. Carbon is not pollution. It’s essential to life. The issue is not CO2. The issue is the IPCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Planets
    Terrestrial Planets First ever ‘whole Earth’ picture from deep space, taken by Bill Anders on Apollo 8 Apollo 8 crew, Bill Anders centre: The Earth is just a planet courtesy Nasa 1- 4 from the Sun Image courtesy: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Terrestrial_planet_size_comparisons_edit.jpg Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are four astonishingly different planets Mercury and Venus have only been seen in any detail within the last 30 years Mercury in sight Courtesy NASA (Mariner 10) Mercury is visible only soon after the setting sun or shortly before dawn the Mariner 10 probe (1974/75) is the source of most information about Mercury – Messenger, launched 2004, first flypast in 2008 and orbit Mercury in 2011. ESA’s BepiColombo, to be launched in 2013 Mercury Mercury is like the Earth inside and the Moon outside Mercury has had a cooling and bombardment history similar to the moon It appears as cratered lava with scarps Its rocks are Earth-like Mariner 10 image Messenger images ↑ Double-ringed crater – a Mercury feature courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/S trom02.jpg ← Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gal lery/sciencePhotos/pics/EN010 8828161M.jpg Messenger image Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/Prockter06.jpg Mercury Close-up Mercury’s topography was formed under stronger gravity than on the Moon The Caloris basin is an impact crater ~1400 km across, beneath which is thought to be a dense mass 2 Mercury’s rotation period is exactly /3 of its orbital period
    [Show full text]
  • The Interior Structure of Super-Earths
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE The interior structure of super-Earths Kaustubh HAKIM Supervisor: Prof. Tim Van Hoolst Thesis presented in Affiliation (KU Leuven) fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Astronomy and Astrophysics Academic year 2013-2014 Scientific Summary Since many centuries, philosophers have wondered about the existence of life away from our home planet. Once it got established that the Sun is just a star similar to the ones that light up our night sky, astronomers started looking for hidden Earth-like worlds with their telescopes. Until the 1990s, there was no sign of any other planetary system. But today, with the discovery of about 800 extra-solar planets early in the year 2014 itself, the total exoplanet count is 1794. These discoveries also led us to a new class of rocky exoplanets called super-Earths. With the possibility of atmospheres and water, they have the potential to sustain life. To explore their surface and internal dynamics, it is necessary to know what they are made up of. The advent of inter-planetary space missions gave scientists the opportunity to ex- plore the interiors of terrestrial planets and satellites other than the Earth. In this thesis, we extend the methods of interior structure modeling developed for terrestrial planets to the super-Earths. As super-Earths are massive with high internal pressures (>1 TPa), extrapolation of these methods needs extreme care. Recently published ab initio data for the behavior of iron at such pressures is compared with the equations of state (EOS) from the literature to arrive at a suitable EOS for the core of super-Earths.
    [Show full text]