DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Final 2018 Amendment to the 2002 Gore Mountain Unit Management Plan and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Final 2018 Amendment to the 2002 Gore Mountain Unit Management Plan and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Final 2018 Amendment to the 2002 Gore Mountain Unit Management Plan and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement March 2018 Lead Agency and Prepared by: The Olympic Regional Development Authority 2634 Main Street, Lake Placid, New York 12946 (518) 302-5332 Contact: Robert W. Hammond and Gore Mountain Ski Center 793 Peaceful Valley Road, North Creek, New York 12853 (518) 251- 2411 Contact: Emily Stanton In cooperation with: The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and in consultation with: The Adirondack Park Agency Ray Brook, New York 12977 Private Consultants: The LA Group, Landscape Architecture and Engineering, P.C. 40 Long Alley, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 (518) 587-8100 Contact: Kevin Franke Date of Acceptance of DGEIS: January 3, 2018 Date of Public Hearing: January 24, 2018 Date of Close of Comment Period: February 9, 2018 Date of Acceptance of FGEIS: ________________ Submitted: February 26, 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION This 2018 Unit Management Plan (UMP) Amendment has been prepared in accordance with the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan (APSLMP or SLMP), addresses changes to the 2002 UMP and the 2005 UMP Amendment thereto, and adds several new management actions. This 2018 UMP Amendment lists and reviews the status of the 1995, 2002 and 2005 management actions and identifies those management actions that have been completed, those which are pending, and those that are modified or abandoned within this 2018 UMP Amendment. Previous UMP documents are incorporated by reference into this document. Since the completion of the last UMP Amendment, Gore Mountain has received recognition from the Ski Industry and the press for, not only its quality skiing experience, but also for its environmental stewardship. In May 2016, Gore Mountain was awarded the esteemed Golden Eagle for Overall Environmental Excellence by a ski area from the National Ski Areas Association. The Golden Eagle is the industry’s most prestigious award for sustainability and Gore’s broad range of environmental stewardship across several areas of its operation was integral to its win. Gore Mountain successfully demonstrated that a growing resort1 can at the same time be sustainable. Projects that contributed to this award were Gore’s contracting of two 25-year solar power purchasing agreements, strategic trail modifications to increase uphill operational efficiency, energy-saving snowmaking, creative repurposing of buildings, the redevelopment of historic trails, various education efforts and Gore’s increased provision of locally sourced food. II. 2018 UMP AMENDMENT MANAGEMENT ACTIONS New management actions are identified and analyzed in this 2018 UMP Amendment. The potential environmental impacts and the attendant proposed mitigation measures for any new or modified management actions are also identified and discussed. The potential impacts and 1 Gore’s acreage and uphill capacity have increased 131 percent and 142 percent respectively over the past 20 years. i the identified mitigation measures for the previously approved UMP management actions remain in effect and will not be repeated here, but are incorporated by reference. The following lists the New Management Actions that are the subject of this UMP Amendment and that can be undertaken after the UMP Amendment is adopted. See Figure ES-1, 2018 Master Plan (South) and Figure ES-2, 2018 Master Plan (North). Trail Construction and Trail Widening • Construct a new trail at Burnt Ridge that connects to the Base Lodge via the lower portion of Echo • Construct a new trail adjacent to the Ski Bowl to replace the existing Half ‘N Half glade. • Widen the bottom of Echo as it turns toward the base area • Widen some sections of Twister • Widen Sunway and other green trails served by Lift 3 Lifts • Add a new triple or quad chair (Lift 9B) from Northwoods Lodge up Lower Sunway to just past the bend in Lower Sunway Vehicular Access and Parking • Modify the 1995-approved shuttle lane separated from and independent of main traffic route and circulation route and parking Buildings • Expand the NYSEF building • Reconfigure the 1995-approved maintenance complex to locate groomer garage and fueling station adjacent to Sunway trail Snowmaking • Enlarge the snowmaking reservoir • Install a new 24 inch gravity water line from the snowmaking reservoir to the pump house Mountain Biking • Construct a single-track bike trail loop for Town trail at the top of Little Gore Hiking • Develop a hiking center based out of the Northwoods Lodge. Requests for Land Reclassifications • Request a land reclassification from Wild Forest to Intensive Use and from Intensive Use to Wilderness which could allow the historic Rabbit Pond Trail to be used as a trail, if authorized in a subsequent UMP. ii Plotted By: MARK TABER Save Date: 2/26/2018 3:58 PM File Name: G:\Proj-2015\201537_Gore_Mountain_2015\201537-04_UMP Work Gore and Ski Bowl\2015037-004CAD\06Gore Plans\G0_04_MasterPlan.dwg LEGEND ADIRONDACKINTENSIVEGORE FOREST USEMOUNTAIN AREA EXISTING TRAILS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRAILS PRESERVE REPLACE & PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRAIL EXTEND LIFT 6 WIDENING PROPOSED TRAILS APPROVED STEILHANG PROPOSED TRAIL WIDENING CLOUD UPPER TRAIL 6N-O EXISTING GLADES CHATIEMAC EXISTING APPURTENANT CLEARING THE RUMOR GORE MOUNTAIN INTENSIVE UPPER USE AREA LAND REQUESTED BARREL DOUBLE LIFT EXISTING LIFTS CLOUD DARBY LIES STEILHANG TO BE RECLASSIFIED LOWER LIFT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DOUBLE BARREL HAWKEYE WILDERNESS GLADES PIT DARKSIDE LIFT PROPOSED LIFTS GLADES MICA OPEN LAND USE BOUNDARY HULLABALOO DELL EXISTING NORDIC & HEADWATERS LOWER DARBY CROSS-COUNTRY TRAILS CLOUD DARBY WOODS WOOD LOT GLADES MINESHAFT FUTURE / PROPOSED MOUNTAIN GLADES NORTH WOOD LOT CHATIEMAC GLADES BIKING TRAIL SANTANONI LOWER CLOUD TRAVERSE SOUTH EXISTING BUILDING LITTLE CHATIEMAC WOODCHUCK CLOUD STRAIGHTBROOK HEADWATERS THE GLEN WOOD OUT CAVE GLADES TRAVERSE PINEBROOK GLADES WOOD IN PINE KNOT RUBY RUN LOWER LOWER UNCUS APPROVED BEAR THE LOOP KILL KARE GLADES MOUNTAIN LODGE FAIRVIEW UNCUS WOOD IN UPPER PETE GAY TANNERY TOPRIDGE POWDER PASS 2N-L HIGH PINES GLADES FOXLAIR 2N-L SLEEPING BEAR NORTH STAR PETE GAY TWISTER 2N-L TAHAWUS SUNWAY SHOWCASE SLEIGHRIDE UPPER PREVIOUSLY THE PEACE PIPE APPROVED TRAILS TAHAWUS GLADES HEDGES 11B-LOWER PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WILD AIR POTENTIAL TRAIL WIDENING SNOWMAKING REPLACE & EXTEND SLEIGHRIDE RESERVOIR LIFT 3 SUNWAY ENLARGEMENT LOWER PROPOSED TRAIL ECHO QUICKSILVER WIDENING TWISTER 11-O CHATTERBOX GLADES ABENAKI GLADES SAGAMORE OTTER SLIDE OTTER SLIDE GLADES 3B 1N-O SHOWCASE CUTOFF TWISTER GLADES BARKEATER GLADES HANDLE LIFT 3 JUG PROPOSED 1A TRAIL 11-O TRAVERSE WARD HILL PIPELINE LOWER WILD AIR (CONSTRUCT POT LUCK 3B JAMBOREE LITTLE DIPPER PORTION OF 11-M SUNWAY TWIN FAWNS PREVIOUSLY 2B APPROVED11-J LIFT 3 ECHO TO LINK NEW 11-I TRAIL SECTIONS) 11-J PROPOSED LIFT 9B BEAR CUB RUN SHOWOFF 11-O 11-L THE ARENA SEE PLAN TITLED BOREAS GLADES 'MASTER PLAN - BASE PIPELINE PEACEFUL AREA' CIRQUE GLADES EAGLE'S NEST BRIDGE VALLEY LOT C LOT A / B EXISTING THE GULLY SAGAMORE GLADES STARTING GATE JIBLAND LOT F SAGAMORE PARKING LOT D LOT E LOT G PEACEFUL LIFT 14 CEDAR'S EAGLES NEST CROSSOVER VALLEY RIDGE TRAIL TRAVERSE TRAIL EXISTING TRAILS ON THE OAK PREVIOUSLY BURNT RIDGE & SKI WIDENING 12O GORE MOUNTAINJOHNSBURG INTENSIVE TOWN USE LANDS AREA APPROVED PARKING BOWL APPROVED TO RECONFIGURE APPROVED LIFT 14 AVERAGE 120' WIDTH GORE ACCESS ROAD HALF & HALF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED GLADES SHUTTLE LANE 12N Prepared for: Drawing Title Date: Feb. 25, 2018 Scale: 1"=1000' 2018 Master Plan - ApprovedDesign: MJT Drawn: KMK and Proposed Actions Ch'k'd: KJF (South) Project No.: 2015037 Olympic Regional Project Title: Drawing No: 0 200 500 1000 Unauthorized alteration or addition to thisDevelopment AuthorityGore Mountain: 2018 Unit Management Plan Amendment & document is a violation of Section 7209 of the Figure ES-1 New York State Education Law. 2634 Main Street Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement SCALE: 1" = 1000 AT 11x17 © the LA Group 2017 Lake Placid, New York 12946 Plotted By: MARK TABER Save Date: 2/26/2018 3:58 PM File Name: G:\Proj-2015\201537_Gore_Mountain_2015\201537-04_UMP Work Gore and Ski Bowl\2015037-004CAD\06Gore Plans\G0_04_MasterPlan.dwg LEGEND EXISTING TRAILS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRAILS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRAIL WIDENING PROPOSED TRAILS PROPOSED TRAIL WIDENING EXISTING GLADES 2N-L EXISTING APPURTENANT CLEARING LIFT EXISTING LIFTS LIFT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED NORTH STAR PETE GAY LIFT PROPOSED LIFTS LAND USE BOUNDARY EXISTING NORDIC & CROSS-COUNTRY TRAILS FUTURE / PROPOSED MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAIL EXISTING TRAILS ON BURNT EXISTING BUILDING THE RIDGE & SKI BOWL APPROVED PEACE PIPE TAHAWUS GLADES TO AVERAGE 120' WIDTH 11B-LOWER POTENTIAL SNOWMAKING RESERVOIR ENLARGEMENT ABENAKI GLADES VANDERWHACKER MOUNTAIN WILD FOREST LAND REQUESTED TO BE RECLASSIFIED INTENSIVE USE AREA BARKEATER GLADES RABBIT POND TRAVERSE PIPELINE 11-M GORE MOUNTAIN INTENSIVE USE AREA 12I-A 11-L 12I-A 12-J BOREAS GLADES PIPELINE 12-M PROPOSED TRAILS PEACEFUL EAGLE'S NEST BRIDGE VALLEY PREVIOUSLY 12-L 12-J 12-I APPROVED TRAILS PEACEFUL 12-I EAGLES NEST CROSSOVER VALLEY 12-G RIDGE TRAIL 12-H EXISTING TRAILS ON THE OAK LIFT 12 BURNT RIDGE & SKI 12O GORE MOUNTAINJOHNSBURG INTENSIVE TOWN USE LANDS AREA BOWL APPROVED TO HUDSON SKI BOWL AVERAGE 120' WIDTH GLADES HALF & HALF GLADES 12-E 46' ER 12N CONVERT EXISTING HALF & MOXHAM HALF GLADE TO TRAIL 12O EXTEND LIFT 13, ADD REPLACE LIFT 12 WITH A HIGH SPEED TRAIL, BUILD ZIP COASTER LIFT 14 (SEE NOTE) VILLAGE SLOPES QUAD & RELOCATE APPROVED LIFT 14 NYS ROUTE 28 NOTE: PROPOSED ACTIONS ON TOWN-OWNED LANDS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS UMP FOR REFERENCE ONLY. Prepared for: Drawing Title Date: Feb. 25, 2018 Scale: 1"=1000' 2018 Master Plan - ApprovedDesign: MJT Drawn: KMK and Proposed Actions Ch'k'd: KJF (North) Project No.: 2015037 Olympic Regional Project Title: Drawing No: 0 200 500 1000 Unauthorized alteration or addition to thisDevelopment AuthorityGore Mountain: 2018 Unit Management Plan Amendment & document is a violation of Section 7209 of the Figure ES-2 New York State Education Law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Gore Mountain UMP Amendment
    Appendix 1 SEQRA Full Environmental Assessment Form Parts 1, 2 and 3 A-1 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. A. Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Gore Mountain Intensive Use Area 2017 Unit Management Plan (UMP) Amendment Project Location (describe, and attach a general
    [Show full text]
  • Relevance of a Major Scarp and Two Associated Landslides in The
    GEOLOGICA BELGICA (2018) 21/3-4: 101-110 Seismotectonic activity in East Belgium: relevance of a major scarp and two associated landslides in the region of Malmedy Anne-Sophie MREYEN1*, Alain DEMOULIN² & Hans-Balder HAVENITH1 1 University of Liege, Department of Geology, Allée du six Août 14, B18, 4000 Liege, Belgium. ² University of Liege, Department of Physical Geography, Clos Mercator 3, B11, 4000 Liege, Belgium. *corresponding author: [email protected]. ABSTRACT. Geomorphological markers such as scarps, river diversions and slope failures can be used as proxy indicators for the seismotectonic activity of a region. This study concentrates on the Malmedy-Bévercé area, E-Belgium, where formerly unknown geomorphological features have been recently discovered in the frame of a new regional geological mapping campaign. The area is characterised by gentle to locally very steep slopes along the Warche valley crossing the Stavelot Massif and the Malmedy Graben. Coupled with a LiDAR-DEM and UAV imagery analysis, field mapping has revealed a steep scarp extending near two landslides on the southern hillslopes of the Warche valley at Bévercé. These slope failures developed in the Permian conglomerates of the Malmedy Formation (also known as the Poudingue de Malmedy), which represent the infill of the Malmedy Graben. Roughly perpendicular to the graben axis, the scarp has a N330°E orientation similar to that of the seismotectonically active Hockai Fault Zone that crosses the Malmedy region in this area. In this paper, we present the geological and geomorphological context of the Bévercé scarp and of the largest landslide. Furthermore, we demonstrate the results of a geophysical reconnaissance survey of the structures (seismic refraction and electrical resistivity profiling).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Design of Rockfall Protection Galleries
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis On the design of rockfall protection galleries Author(s): Schellenberg, Kristian Publication Date: 2008 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005711071 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO. 17924 ON THE DESIGN OF ROCKFALL PROTECTION GALLERIES A dissertation submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by KRISTIAN SCHELLENBERG Dipl. Bauingenieur ETH born 18.07.1978 citizen of Winkel ZH accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Thomas Vogel, examiner Prof. Dr. Norimitsu Kishi, co-examiner 2008 Dedicated to my father Jorge Hugo Schellenberg “El hombre es lo que su alma trae, su voluntad modifica, o su dejadez acentúa.”. Table of contents Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................... 4 Resumen ................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Existing structures ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downscaling of Climate Change Scenarios for a High Resolution, Site
    https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-9 Preprint. Discussion started: 31 March 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Downscaling of climate change scenarios for a high resolution, site– specific assessment of drought stress risk for two viticultural regions with heterogeneous landscapes Marco Hofmann 1, Claudia Volosciuk 2, Martin Dubrovský 3,4 , Douglas Maraun 5 and Hans R. Schultz 1 5 1Department of General and Organic Viticulture, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, 65366, Germany 2Science and Innovation Department, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland 3Institute of Atmospheric Physics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, 141 00, Czech Republic 4Global Change Research Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic 5Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, University of Graz, Graz, 8010, Austria 10 Correspondence to : Marco Hofmann ([email protected]) Abstract. Extended periods without precipitation observed for example in Central Europe including Germany during the seasons from 2018 to 2020, can lead to water deficit and yield and quality losses for grape and wine production. However, irrigation infrastructure is largely non–existent. Regional climate models project changes of precipitation amounts and patterns, indicating an increase in frequency of occurrence of comparable situations in the future. In order to assess possible impacts of 15 climate change on the water budget of grapevines, a water balance model was developed, which accounts for the large heterogeneity of vineyards with respect to their soil water storage capacity, evapotranspiration as a function of slope and aspect, and viticultural management practices. The model was fed with data from soil maps (soil type and plant available water capacity), a digital elevation model, the European Union (EU) vineyard–register, observed weather data and future weather data provided by regional climate models and a stochastic weather generator.
    [Show full text]
  • D.T1.1.3 New Assessment Methods for Protection Forests in the AS 1.53 Mb
    D.T1.1.3 Report on ‘New assessment methods for protection forests in the AS’ WP 1 Responsibility for Deliverable Michaela Teich (BFW) Contributors Matthias Plörer (BFW) Innsbruck, September 2020 D.T1.1.3 – Report on ‘New assessment methods for protection forests in the AS’ 1 GreenRisk4ALPs Partnership BFW - Austrian Research Centre for Forests (AT) DISAFA - Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin (ITA) EURAC - European Academy of Bozen-Bolzano – EURAC Research (ITA) INRAE – French national research institute for agriculture, food and the environment, Grenoble regional centre (FRA) LWF - Bavarian State Institute of Forestry (GER) MFM - Forestry company Franz-Mayr-Melnhof-Saurau (AT) SFM - Safe Mountain Foundation (ITA) UL - University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Resources (SLO) UGOE - University of Göttingen, Department of Forest and Nature Conservation Policy (GER) WSL - Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH) WLV - Austrian Service for Torrent and Avalanche Control (AT) SFS - Slovenia Forest Service (SLO) D.T1.1.3 – Report on ‘New assessment methods for protection forests in the AS’ 2 Table of Contents Table of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 4 Table of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 5 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Amendment to the 2002 Gore Mountain Unit Management Plan and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement
    Proposed Final 2018 Amendment to the 2002 Gore Mountain Unit Management Plan and Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement MayMarch 2018 Lead Agency and Prepared by: The Olympic Regional Development Authority 2634 Main Street, Lake Placid, New York 12946 (518) 302-5332 Contact: Robert W. Hammond and Gore Mountain Ski Center 793 Peaceful Valley Road, North Creek, New York 12853 (518) 251- 2411 Contact: Emily Stanton In cooperation with: The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and in consultation with: The Adirondack Park Agency Ray Brook, New York 12977 Private Consultants: The LA Group, Landscape Architecture and Engineering, P.C. 40 Long Alley, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866 (518) 587-8100 Contact: Kevin Franke Date of Acceptance of DGEIS: January 3, 2018 Date of Public Hearing: January 24, 2018 Date of Close of Comment Period: February 9, 2018 Date of Acceptance of FGEIS: April 25, 2018________________ Submitted: May 2,February 26, 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION This 2018 Unit Management Plan (UMP) Amendment has been prepared in accordance with the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan (APSLMP or SLMP), addresses changes to the 2002 UMP and the 2005 UMP Amendment thereto, and adds several new management actions. This 2018 UMP Amendment lists and reviews the statusthe status of the 1995, 2002 and 2005 management actions and identifies those management actions that have been completed, those which are pending, and those that are modified or abandoned within this 2018 UMP Amendment. Previous UMP documents are incorporated by reference into this document. Since the completion of the last UMP Amendment, Gore Mountain has received recognition from the Ski Industry and the press for, not only its quality skiing experience, but also for its environmental stewardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Climate Change and Adaptation
    EEA Report No 8/2009 Regional climate change and adaptation The Alps facing the challenge of changing water resources ISSN 1725-9177 EEA Report No 8/2009 Regional climate change and adaptation The Alps facing the challenge of changing water resources Cover design: EEA Cover photo © Marc Zebisch Left photo © stockxpert Right photo © Torsten Grothmann Layout: EEA/Pia Schmidt Legal notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Commission or other institutions of the European Communities. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Copyright notice © EEA, Copenhagen, 2009 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. Information about the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9213-006-0 ISSN 1725-9177 DOI 10.2800/12552 © EEA, Copenhagen, 2009 Environmental production This publication is printed according to high environmental standards. Printed by Schultz Grafisk — Environmental Management Certificate: ISO 14001 — IQNet – The International Certification Network DS/EN ISO 14001:2004 — Quality Certificate: ISO 9001: 2000 — EMAS Registration. Licence no. DK – 000235 — Ecolabelling with the Nordic Swan, licence no. 541 176 Paper RePrint — 90 gsm. CyclusOffset — 250 gsm. Both paper qualities are recycled paper and have obtained the ecolabel Nordic Swan. Printed in Denmark REG.NO. DK-000244 European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 1050 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel.: +45 33 36 71 00 Fax: +45 33 36 71 99 Web: eea.europa.eu Enquiries: eea.europa.eu/enquiries Contents Contents List of figures and tables ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Water Retention
    safety explosive 1155 safe, clear, easy of access, of easy access ● frei von Klippen und Untiefen, frei von Hindernissen S safe against base failure ● grundbruchsicher safe against buckling ● knicksicher safe cover ● Deckung f [beim Sprengen] safe slope, stable slope ● standfeste Bo¨schung f, SA, selective availability ● Aktivieren n der Option, sichere Bo¨schung Optionsaktivieren safe slope of cut, stable slope of cut ● standfeste Saale glaciation, Saale (glacial stage) [The terms Einschnittbo¨schung f, sichere Einschnittbo¨schung applied in northern Europe to the third classical safety bank > protective bank glacial stage of the Pleistocene Epoch after the safety against buckling ● Knicksicherheit f [z. B. von Elster glacial stage and before the Weichsel, Pfa¨hlen] equivalent to the Riss and Illinoian glacial stages] ● safety against ground failure, safety against slope Saaleeiszeit f failure, safety against shear failure ● Gela¨ndebruchsi- saber growth (US), bent growth, sabre growth (Brit.) cherheit f [of trees] ● Sa¨belwuchs m [von Ba¨umen; er ist oft ein safety against shear failure > safety against Hinweis auf Kriechverformungen des Hangs] ground failure sabkha [Arabic] > vloer safety against sliding, horizontal resistance ● saccharoidal, sucrosic, sugary ● zuckerko¨rnig Gleitsicherheit f [Sie ist ha¨ufig der entscheidende sacrificial anode ● Opferanode f gru¨ndungstechnische Nachweis bei Bauten im offenen sacrificial cone [of a dynamic penetrometer] ● Wasser] verlorene Spitze f [einer Rammsonde] safety against slope failure, safety
    [Show full text]
  • Machinery-Induced Damage to Soil and Remaining Forest Stands—Case Study from Slovakia
    Article Machinery-Induced Damage to Soil and Remaining Forest Stands—Case Study from Slovakia Zuzana Dudáková (Allmanová) 1,*, Michal Allman 1,Ján Merganiˇc 1 and Katarína Merganiˇcová 2,3 1 Department of Forest Harvesting, Logistics and Ameliorations, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (J.M.) 2 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 6-Suchdol, 16500 Praha, Czech Republic; merganicova@fld.czu.cz 3 Department of Biodiversity of Ecosystems and Landscape, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štefánikova 3, P.O. Box 25, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 29 November 2020; Published: 30 November 2020 Abstract: The paper deals with the damage of the remaining stand and soil caused by harvesting using three ground-based forest operations methods (harvester-forwarder/cable skidder/animal-tractor). It compares the impact of the most common harvesting technologies applied in Slovakia and in Central Europe and thus contributes with valuable information to the knowledge on the suitability of their application in forests stands dominated by broadleaved tree species. Harvesting was performed in five forest stands located at the University Forest Enterprise of Technical University in Zvolen in central Slovakia from August to October 2019. Damage to remaining trees was assessed from the point of its size, type, and position of damage along stem. We expected lower damage of remaining trees in stands where harvesters were used because of the applied cut-to-length short wood system and fully mechanized harvesting system.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Climate Change and Adaptation
    EEA Report No 8/2009 Regional climate change and adaptation The Alps facing the challenge of changing water resources ISSN 1725-9177 EEA Report No 8/2009 Regional climate change and adaptation The Alps facing the challenge of changing water resources Cover design: EEA Cover photo © Marc Zebisch Left photo © stockxpert Right photo © Torsten Grothmann Layout: EEA/Pia Schmidt Legal notice The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the European Commission or other institutions of the European Communities. Neither the European Environment Agency nor any person or company acting on behalf of the Agency is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Copyright notice © EEA, Copenhagen, 2009 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. Information about the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9213-006-0 ISSN 1725-9177 DOI 10.2800/12552 © EEA, Copenhagen, 2009 Environmental production This publication is printed according to high environmental standards. Printed by Schultz Grafisk — Environmental Management Certificate: ISO 14001 — IQNet – The International Certification Network DS/EN ISO 14001:2004 — Quality Certificate: ISO 9001: 2000 — EMAS Registration. Licence no. DK – 000235 — Ecolabelling with the Nordic Swan, licence no. 541 176 Paper RePrint — 90 gsm. CyclusOffset — 250 gsm. Both paper qualities are recycled paper and have obtained the ecolabel Nordic Swan. Printed in Denmark REG.NO. DK-000244 European Environment Agency Kongens Nytorv 6 1050 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel.: +45 33 36 71 00 Fax: +45 33 36 71 99 Web: eea.europa.eu Enquiries: eea.europa.eu/enquiries Contents Contents List of figures and tables ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Differentiating Between Forest Community Types with Topographic Variables in the Canton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden
    MASTER’S THESIS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, ETH ZÜRICH Possibilities of differentiating between forest community types with topographic variables in the canton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden Author: Supervisors: Kevin Simmler Dr. Peter Bebi, ETH 14-915-326 Dr. Alexander Bast, SLF Dr. Frank Graf, SLF Tuesday 5th May, 2020 iii Abstract Forests often play an important role in mitigating the effects of natural haz- ards on humans and infrastructure, in particular in mountainous and densely populated countries like Switzerland. The protective function of forests de- pends on the forest community and its condition. Consequently, knowledge about forest communities is crucial to ensure site-adapted silvicultural mea- sures. The low fraction of mapped forest communities and their expense of mapping call for ways of classifying forest communities remotely. The use of Digital Terrain Models (DTM) to do so arises because of their widespread availability, and the correlation between variables driving the distribution of forest communities and variables derived from DTMs. This thesis examined how well elevation and derivatives of DTMs can be used to distinguish be- tween forest communities. Topographic Wetness Indices (TWI) were calculated for three different spa- tial resolutions using two different Multiple Flow Direction (MFD) and one Single Flow Direction (SFD) flow routing algorithm. Additionally, the TWI was weighted with mean yearly precipitation. The data were extracted using a proportional stratified regular sampling. The analysis was conducted by looking at the differences between the forest communities descriptively and by calculating different Random Forest models. Forest communities were found to occur at rather distinct elevation and slope values, while the variation of the aspect values was much higher.
    [Show full text]
  • From Text to Landscape: Extraction of Landscape Concepts Through the Resolution of Ambiguity and Vagueness Present in Descriptions of Natural Landscapes
    From Text to Landscape: Extraction of Landscape Concepts through the Resolution of Ambiguity and Vagueness present in Descriptions of Natural Landscapes. Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Curdin Derungs von Brigels GR Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Ross Purves (Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Robert Weibel Dr. Bettina Waldvogel Martin Hägeli Zürich 2014 Zusammenfassung Wie beschreiben Menschen ihre unmittelbare Umgebung? Diese Frage ist zentral für viele Aufgaben von sozialer Relevanz. Beispiele sind die Raumplanung, das Ressourcenmanagement oder Krisenintervention. Für diese Aufgaben gilt, dass räumliche Information wichtig ist, die widerspiegelt wie der Menschen den Raum versteht. Falls die Information nicht dem menschlichen Verständnis des Raumes entspricht, ist sie nicht nützlich und kann zu falschen Entscheidungen führen. Landschaftsbeschreibungen enthalten viele Unsicherheiten und sind darum eine Herausforderung für die Geographie. Die meisten Unsicherheiten gründen auf der menschlichen Wahrnehmung. Menschen haben unterschiedliche Konzepte von der gleichen Landschaft und nutzen darum unterschiedliche Worte um sie zu beschreiben. Das ist insbesondere wahr wenn Menschen aus unterschiedlichen Kultur- und Sprachgruppen verglichen werden. Eine andere Ursache von Unsicherheit hängt mit den Objekten zusammen die genutzt werden, um Landschaften zu beschreiben. Beispiele von solchen Objekten sind Berg, Tal, Hügel, Fluss oder Wald. Ein Berg ist beispielsweise weder rein natürlich, noch ist er eindeutig Mensch-gemacht. Die stoffliche Basis von geographischen Objekten ist meist natürlich, so zum Beispiel der Stein, der dem Berg seine Form gibt. Einen Ausschnitt des kontinuierlichen Verlaufes der Erdoberfläche aber als individuelle Objekte wahrzunehmen ist menschlich. Dieser Umstand gestaltet sowohl die semantische, als auch die räumliche Definition von Landschaftsobjekten als äusserst schwierig.
    [Show full text]