Physics and Psychoacoustics of Plucked-String Instruments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Physics and Psychoacoustics of Plucked-String Instruments PHYSICS AND PSYCHOACOUSTICS OF PLUCKED-STRING INSTRUMENTS Wiliam H. Roberts A thesis submitted to Cardiff University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 4/8/2015 Acknowledgements Firstly I must thank my parents for their tremendous support, guidance and patience throughout my education, particularly during this doctorate. Thanks to Bernard for engrossing conversations and guidance over the past seven years or so, for introducing me to the fascinating world of musical acoustics and for having faith in my abilities. Many thanks too to Ian Perry for his help with admittance and wire-break measurements, for the use of his sound-field data and for general chats on the subject of musical acoustics. Thanks to Rob Mcleod for various chats on the subject of psychoacoustics and for a few pointers on conducting listening tests. I would also like to express my gratitude to everyone who took listening tests, especially to those who sat through a number of them. This work would not have been made possible were it not for your kindly giving up your time to listen to my sounds. Thanks to Rhys for the use of his folk guitar, and Eugene, Ben and Rhodri for the use of their banjos. A special mention goes to the musicians I’ve played alongside over the past few years, who have constantly fuelled my interest in this subject; cheers Sam, Heledd, Tara, Rhys, Huw, Daf, Laura, Guto, Rhodri, Rhys, Robin, Simon, Jimmy and Winskill! Also special thanks to Tara for making the final year of my doctorate the best it possibly could have been. Yn olaf, diolch arbennig i fy holl deulu am fod yn gyfeillion a chefnogwyr mor frwd, ac yn enwedig i Nain am edrych drosta i. i ii Summary The overall goal of this work is to help classical guitar makers to have better control over the potential sound of their instruments. This is done by correlating changes in the vibrational behaviour of an instrument with perceivable changes in its radiated sound. Three strategies have been employed in this thesis in an attempt to accomplish this goal. An investigation is carried out on the vibrational properties and radiated sound of a classical guitar, steel-string folk guitar and a five-string banjo. The aim here is to demonstrate how large constructional differences in plucked-string instruments lead to their unique acoustical characteristics. Results demonstrate that effective masses of low-order body modes relative to higher-order ones, internal damping of strings and amount of coupling between strings and the body of an instrument are responsible for the main characteristics of these instruments’ acoustical signatures. The problem of over-coupling a string to the body of a classical guitar is then addressed. Over-coupling creates an uneven tone quality between notes, an effect known as wolf notes. Knowledge of the perceptual threshold of over-coupling, which is found using psychoacoustical tests, can help instrument makers build a strongly radiating instrument without wolf notes. Simple remedies are suggested to minimise the effects of wolf notes on existing guitars in the most effective manner. Finally, the smallest perceivable changes are found in the parameters of a physical model of a classical guitar. The parameters that are responsible for the most perceptually obvious changes are likely to be the most important ones for the maker to control because these are the parameters to which our ears are most sensitive. The effective mass and effective area of low-order modes are studied in detail because these parameters have been identified previously as having a strong influence over the radiated sound from the instrument. iii iv Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 1.1 Aims ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Brief history and anatomy of the guitar and banjo ......................... 2 1.2.1 Guitar ......................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Banjo ......................................................................... 5 1.3 Basic function of a plucked-string instrument ............................... 7 1.4 Previous work ..................................................................... 9 1.4.1 Modelling ..................................................................... 9 1.4.2 Psychoacoustics ............................................................ 10 1.5 Structure of thesis .............................................................. 14 Chapter 2 Background Theory ........................................................ 17 2.1 String vibration .................................................................. 17 2.1.1 Dispersion and damping ................................................... 17 2.1.2 Peak heights of string partials ........................................... 18 2.1.3 Characterising string decays ............................................. 19 2.2 Instrument body ................................................................. 21 2.2.1 Dynamics of the body and the oscillator model ....................... 22 2.2.2 Mode shapes ................................................................ 23 2.3 String-body interaction ......................................................... 24 2.3.1 Local coupling strength ................................................... 25 2.3.2 Global coupling level ...................................................... 26 2.4 Sound radiation .................................................................. 26 2.4.1 Monopole radiation ........................................................ 27 2.4.2 Dipole radiation ............................................................ 29 Chapter 3 Experimental Methods .................................................... 31 3.1 Extracting parameters of exponentially decaying sinusoids .............. 31 3.2 Error in amplitude measurement of decaying sinusoidal signals ......... 33 v 3.2.1 Parseval’s theorem ........................................................ 35 3.2.2 Leakage error .............................................................. 35 3.2.3 Comparison of methods ................................................... 37 3.3 Characteristic impedance of a string ........................................ 38 3.4 Mechanical response ............................................................ 40 3.4.1 Measuring input admittance ............................................. 41 3.4.2 Simple peak picking ....................................................... 41 3.5 Studying mode shapes .......................................................... 42 3.6 Sound-field measurement ..................................................... 43 Chapter 4 Physical Measurements ................................................... 47 4.1 Radiated sound .................................................................. 47 4.1.1 Waterfall plots ............................................................. 48 4.1.2 String parameters ......................................................... 52 4.2 Characteristic impedance results ............................................. 58 4.3 Input admittance ................................................................ 60 4.3.1 Comparing the response at different positions along the bridge of a classical guitar ............................................................................. 60 4.3.2 Adding mass to the anti-nodal region of a mode ...................... 64 4.3.3 Input admittance of a banjo ............................................. 66 4.3.4 Comparing input admittances of different instruments.............. 68 4.3.5 Modal parameters of plucked-string instruments ..................... 71 4.4 Global coupling level ........................................................... 73 4.5 Mode shapes ..................................................................... 74 4.5.1 Classical guitars ............................................................ 75 4.5.2 Steel-string guitars ........................................................ 77 4.5.3 Banjo ........................................................................ 80 4.5.4 Discussion ................................................................... 81 Chapter 5 Psychoacoustics ............................................................ 83 5.1 Signal detection theory ........................................................ 83 5.2 Adaptive listening tests ........................................................ 85 5.2.1 Test procedure ............................................................. 85 5.2.2 Relating test result to psychometric function ......................... 87 5.2.3 Choice between two-down and three-down tests .................... 88 5.3 Masking and critical bands ..................................................... 89 vi 5.4 Basic JND tests .................................................................. 90 5.4.1 JNDs in parameters of the fundamental of note A2 ................... 91 5.4.2 Extending investigation ................................................... 92 5.4.3 Results and discussion ..................................................... 93 Chapter 6 Wolf notes on the classical guitar ....................................... 95 6.1 Modelling coupled string-body modes ........................................ 95 6.1.1 Previous model ............................................................. 95 6.1.2 Developing the model ..................................................... 96 6.1.3 Validating the
Recommended publications
  • African Music Vol 6 No 2(Seb).Cdr
    94 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF AFRICAN MUSIC THE GORA AND THE GRAND’ GOM-GOM: by ERICA MUGGLESTONE 1 INTRODUCTION For three centuries the interest of travellers and scholars alike has been aroused by the gora, an unbraced mouth-resonated musical bow peculiar to South Africa, because it is organologically unusual in that it is a blown chordophone.2 A split quill is attached to the bowstring at one end of the instrument. The string is passed through a hole in one end of the quill and secured; the other end of the quill is then bound or pegged to the stave. The string is lashed to the other end of the stave so that it may be tightened or loosened at will. The player holds the quill lightly bet­ ween his parted lips, and, by inhaling and exhaling forcefully, causes the quill (and with it the string) to vibrate. Of all the early descriptions of the gora, that of Peter Kolb,3 a German astronom­ er who resided at the Cape of Good Hope from 1705 to 1713, has been the most contentious. Not only did his character and his publication in general come under attack, but also his account of Khoikhoi4 musical bows in particular. Kolb’s text indicates that two types of musical bow were observed, to both of which he applied the name gom-gom. The use of the same name for both types of bow and the order in which these are described in the text, seems to imply that the second type is a variant of the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 12. Vibrating Strings
    Lab 12. Vibrating Strings Goals • To experimentally determine the relationships between the fundamental resonant frequency of a vibrating string and its length, its mass per unit length, and the tension in the string. • To introduce a useful graphical method for testing whether the quantities x and y are related by a “simple power function” of the form y = axn. If so, the constants a and n can be determined from the graph. • To experimentally determine the relationship between resonant frequencies and higher order “mode” numbers. • To develop one general relationship/equation that relates the resonant frequency of a string to the four parameters: length, mass per unit length, tension, and mode number. Introduction Vibrating strings are part of our common experience. Which as you may have learned by now means that you have built up explanations in your subconscious about how they work, and that those explanations are sometimes self-contradictory, and rarely entirely correct. Musical instruments from all around the world employ vibrating strings to make musical sounds. Anyone who plays such an instrument knows that changing the tension in the string changes the pitch, which in physics terms means changing the resonant frequency of vibration. Similarly, changing the thickness (and thus the mass) of the string also affects its sound (frequency). String length must also have some effect, since a bass violin is much bigger than a normal violin and sounds much different. The interplay between these factors is explored in this laboratory experi- ment. You do not need to know physics to understand how instruments work. In fact, in the course of this lab alone you will engage with material which entire PhDs in music theory have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of String Instruments
    The Science of String Instruments Thomas D. Rossing Editor The Science of String Instruments Editor Thomas D. Rossing Stanford University Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) Stanford, CA 94302-8180, USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-7109-8 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-7110-4 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7110-4 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer ScienceþBusiness Media (www.springer.com) Contents 1 Introduction............................................................... 1 Thomas D. Rossing 2 Plucked Strings ........................................................... 11 Thomas D. Rossing 3 Guitars and Lutes ........................................................ 19 Thomas D. Rossing and Graham Caldersmith 4 Portuguese Guitar ........................................................ 47 Octavio Inacio 5 Banjo ...................................................................... 59 James Rae 6 Mandolin Family Instruments........................................... 77 David J. Cohen and Thomas D. Rossing 7 Psalteries and Zithers .................................................... 99 Andres Peekna and Thomas D.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Youth Philharmonic Orchestra – Seating Auditions 2018
    NEC Youth Philharmonic Orchestra – Seating Auditions 2018 NEC Youth Philharmonic Orchestra seating audition requirements: YPO students should prepare one solo work or movement of their choice. Additionally, students should prepare the required excerpts for their instrument which can be found below. YPO Seating audition – Wind, brass, and harp excerpts All excerpts from Shostakovich Symphony No.5, unless otherwise noted. Flute and piccolo excerpts Piccolo – Please prepare both of the following excerpts. Required of all flutists. 1. Figure 45 to 4 bars after Figure 45 2. Figure 53 to Figure 54 2018-19 YPO Seating auditions – Wind/Brass/Harp excerpts Flute – please prepare both of the following excerpts 1. 1st Flute: Figure 79 to Figure 81 2018-19 YPO Seating auditions – Wind/Brass/Harp excerpts Flute excerpts cont. 2. 1st Flute: 4 bars before Figure 98 (with pickup) to Figure 101 2018-19 YPO Seating auditions – Wind/Brass/Harp excerpts Oboe and English horn Oboe - please prepare both of the following excerpts 1. 1st oboe: Figure 42 to Figure 43 2. 1st oboe: Figure 53 to Figure 54 2018-19 YPO Seating auditions – Wind/Brass/Harp excerpts Oboe and English horn excerpts cont. English horn - please prepare the following excerpt. (Optional but encouraged) Berlioz-Roman Carnival Overture, andante sostenuto to 2 bars before Figure 3 Clarinets - please prepare both of the following excerpts 1. 1st Clarinet: 2 bars after Figure 41 to Figure 43 2018-19 YPO Seating auditions – Wind/Brass/Harp excerpts Clarinet excerpts cont. 2. 1st Clarinet: 4 bars before Figure 98 (with pickup) to Figure 101) E-flat Clarinet - please prepare the following excerpt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Musical Kinetic Shape: a Variable Tension String Instrument
    The Musical Kinetic Shape: AVariableTensionStringInstrument Ismet Handˇzi´c, Kyle B. Reed University of South Florida, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tampa, Florida Abstract In this article we present a novel variable tension string instrument which relies on a kinetic shape to actively alter the tension of a fixed length taut string. We derived a mathematical model that relates the two-dimensional kinetic shape equation to the string’s physical and dynamic parameters. With this model we designed and constructed an automated instrument that is able to play frequencies within predicted and recognizable frequencies. This prototype instrument is also able to play programmed melodies. Keywords: musical instrument, variable tension, kinetic shape, string vibration 1. Introduction It is possible to vary the fundamental natural oscillation frequency of a taut and uniform string by either changing the string’s length, linear density, or tension. Most string musical instruments produce di↵erent tones by either altering string length (fretting) or playing preset and di↵erent string gages and string tensions. Although tension can be used to adjust the frequency of a string, it is typically only used in this way for fine tuning the preset tension needed to generate a specific note frequency. In this article, we present a novel string instrument concept that is able to continuously change the fundamental oscillation frequency of a plucked (or bowed) string by altering string tension in a controlled and predicted Email addresses: [email protected] (Ismet Handˇzi´c), [email protected] (Kyle B. Reed) URL: http://reedlab.eng.usf.edu/ () Preprint submitted to Applied Acoustics April 19, 2014 Figure 1: The musical kinetic shape variable tension string instrument prototype.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Viola Strings with Harmonic Frequency Analysis
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music Music, School of 5-2011 A Comparison of Viola Strings with Harmonic Frequency Analysis Jonathan Paul Crosmer University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/musicstudent Part of the Music Commons Crosmer, Jonathan Paul, "A Comparison of Viola Strings with Harmonic Frequency Analysis" (2011). Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music. 33. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/musicstudent/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Music, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A COMPARISON OF VIOLA STRINGS WITH HARMONIC FREQUENCY ANALYSIS by Jonathan P. Crosmer A DOCTORAL DOCUMENT Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Musical Arts Major: Music Under the Supervision of Professor Clark E. Potter Lincoln, Nebraska May, 2011 A COMPARISON OF VIOLA STRINGS WITH HARMONIC FREQUENCY ANALYSIS Jonathan P. Crosmer, D.M.A. University of Nebraska, 2011 Adviser: Clark E. Potter Many brands of viola strings are available today. Different materials used result in varying timbres. This study compares 12 popular brands of strings. Each set of strings was tested and recorded on four violas. We allowed two weeks after installation for each string set to settle, and we were careful to control as many factors as possible in the recording process.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Thirtythursdays
    7ThirtyThursdays Harp Ensemble Cathy Clayton, director Utah Composers Collective Thursday, June 10, 2021 Virtual Venue - https://music.utah.edu/libby-live/index.php 7:30 p.m. Program Harp Ensemble Sign of the Times Harry Styles (b. 1994) arr. Megan Sowby When I’m Sixty-Four John Lennon (1940-1980) Paul McCartney (b. 1942) arr. Misty Williams While My Guitar Gently Weeps John Lennon George Harrison (1943-2001) arr. Chloe Barry Harpists Chloe Barry Annabelle Buchanan Maryruth Culver Katie Damon Lillian Dukes Saylee Johnson Addison Line Marienna Smith Megan Sowby Filming and editing by Maryruth Culver and Chloe Barry Utah Composers Collective Corrections Christopher Newman Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Saylee Johnson, harp Eric Hopkins, percussion Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Croquis de France, Movement VII Jacob Whitchurch Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Saylee Johnson, harp Eric Hopkins, percussion Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Soundlence Dallas Herndon Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Alexah Coon, harp Eric Hopkins, percussion Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Procrastination Natalie Van Horn Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Alexah Coon, harp Eric Hopkins, percussion Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Lakeshore Zheng Zhou Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Alexah Coon, harp Eric Hopkins, percussion Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Cinema Suite Garret Jay Christian Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Kaytie Kerr, harp Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Dreams Like Snow Young Jo Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon Kaytie Kerr, harp Young Jo, piano Yu-Feng Huang, conductor Adagio and Allegro for Woodwind Trio Joshua Goodell Christina Castellanos, flute Katie Porter, clarinet Dylan Neff, bassoon This event is supported in part by Fine Arts Fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiment 12
    Experiment 12 Velocity and Propagation of Waves 12.1 Objective To use the phenomenon of resonance to determine the velocity of the propagation of waves in taut strings and wires. 12.2 Discussion Any medium under tension or stress has the following property: disturbances, motions of the matter of which the medium consists, are propagated through the medium. When the disturbances are periodic, they are called waves, and when the disturbances are simple harmonic, the waves are sinusoidal and are characterized by a common wavelength and frequency. The velocity of propagation of a disturbance, whether or not it is periodic, depends generally upon the tension or stress in the medium and on the density of the medium. The greater the stress: the greater the velocity; and the greater the density: the smaller the velocity. In the case of a taut string or wire, the velocity v depends upon the tension T in the string or wire and the mass per unit length µ of the string or wire. Theory predicts that the relation should be T v2 = (12.1) µ Most disturbances travel so rapidly that a direct determination of their velocity is not possible. However, when the disturbance is simple harmonic, the sinusoidal character of the waves provides a simple method by which the velocity of the waves can be indirectly determined. This determination involves the frequency f and wavelength λ of the wave. Here f is the frequency of the simple harmonic motion of the medium and λ is from any point of the wave to the next point of the same phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Simulation of Piano String Vibration
    The simulation of piano string vibration: From physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides Julien Bensa, Stefan Bilbao, Richard Kronland-Martinet, Julius Smith Iii To cite this version: Julien Bensa, Stefan Bilbao, Richard Kronland-Martinet, Julius Smith Iii. The simulation of piano string vibration: From physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Acoustical Society of America, 2003, 114 (2), pp.1095-1107. 10.1121/1.1587146. hal-00088329 HAL Id: hal-00088329 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00088329 Submitted on 1 Aug 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License The simulation of piano string vibration: From physical models to finite difference schemes and digital waveguides Julien Bensa, Stefan Bilbao, Richard Kronland-Martinet, and Julius O. Smith III Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), Department of Music, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-8180 A model of transverse piano string vibration, second order in time, which models frequency-dependent loss and dispersion effects is presented here. This model has many desirable properties, in particular that it can be written as a well-posed initial-boundary value problem ͑permitting stable finite difference schemes͒ and that it may be directly related to a digital waveguide model, a digital filter-based algorithm which can be used for musical sound synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • String Instruments 1
    String Instruments 1 STRINGS 318-1 Harp Technique and Pedagogy I (0.5 Unit) Pedagogical STRING INSTRUMENTS instruction and demonstration of teaching techniques for all levels and ages. music.northwestern.edu/academics/areas-of-study/strings STRINGS 318-2 Harp Technique and Pedagogy II (0.5 Unit) Pedagogical Majors in string instruments prepare for professional performance and instruction and demonstration of teaching techniques for all levels and teaching as well as for advanced study. The curriculum is built around ages. individual study and ensemble participation, including chamber music STRINGS 318-3 Harp Technique and Pedagogy III (0.5 Unit) Pedagogical and orchestra, with orchestral repertoire studies and string pedagogy instruction and demonstration of teaching techniques for all levels and available to qualified juniors and seniors. A junior recital and a senior ages. recital are required. Students in this program may major in violin, viola, STRINGS 319-1 Orchestral Repertoire I (Violin,Viola,Cello,Dbl Bass,Harp) cello, double bass, harp, or classical guitar. (0.5 Unit) Program of Study STRINGS 319-2 Orchestral Repertoire II (Violin,Viola,Cello,Dbl Bass,Harp) (0.5 Unit) • String Instruments Major (https://catalogs.northwestern.edu/ undergraduate/music/string-instruments/string-instruments-major/) STRINGS 319-3 Orchestral Repertoire III (Violin,Viola,Cello,Dbl Bass,Harp) (0.5 Unit) STRINGS 141-0 Applied Violin for Music Majors (1 Unit) STRINGS 335-0 Selected Topics (0.5-1 Unit) Topics vary; announced STRINGS 142-0 Applied Viola for
    [Show full text]
  • LCC for Guitar - Introduction
    LCC for Guitar - Introduction In order for guitarists to understand the significance of the Lydian Chromatic Concept of Tonal Organization and the concept of Tonal Gravity, one must first look at the nature of string vibration and what happens when a string vibrates. The Lydian Chromatic concept is based in the science of natural acoustics, so it is important to understand exactly what happens acoustically to a note and the harmonic overtones that nature creates. A guitar string (or any string from any stringed instrument) vibrates when plucked or struck, producing a tone. The vibrating string creates a natural resonant series of vibration patterns which are called Harmonics. When you strike the string by itself, it vibrates back and forth and moves air molecules, producing sound. This is called a FUNDAMENTAL. (See fig 1.01a) Fig 1.01a – FUNADAMENTAL/OPEN STRING = A 440hz/440cps The fundamental vibration pattern on a single string. This is the FUNDAMENTAL vibration or tone and can be equated to a fixed amount of vibrations or cycles per second (cps) For example, consider this to be the open ‘A’ string producing the note A which in turn a universally considered to vibrate at 440cps or the equivalent of 440hz. If you loosen a guitar string you can visually see the result of the vibrations; the string makes a wide arc near the center and it narrows towards each end. When you touch the string exactly in the center (exactly between both ends or on the guitar the physical location is at the 12 th fret) it divides the vibration exactly in half and produces a note or tone exactly one octave higher in pitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Streharne P398EMI Final Report
    Stephen Treharne Physics 398 project, Fall 2000 Abstract: The sustain of a guitar, that is, the amount of time a note will resonate before fading away due to natural dampening effects, has been the subject of much conjecture and endless speculation for as long as acoustic and electric guitars have been played. Due to the importance of sustain in determining the overall sound quality and playability of a guitar, however, such speculation and debate surrounding the issue of guitar sustain is justifiable. Unfortunately, much of this speculation derives from the inexact qualitative methods characteristically used to describe sustain, usually based on the human ear and a perceived sense of how strong a note sounds for a given span of time. Indeed, many claims have been made concerning the effect that adding weight to the headstock of a guitar, playing with new strings, playing in certain kinds of weather, etc., has on increasing the sustain of a guitar. Although such reports give a basis for some interesting speculation, many of them suffer for lack of quantifiable evidence. This experiment seeks to establish at least the beginnings of using objective and quantifiable measurements taken in a laboratory setting to begin the scientific investigation of confirming or refuting many of these claims. Although the setup of the equipment used to make these measurements, and, more importantly, the writing of the code used in the computer program developed to take the essential data, was the most time consuming step in the process of doing the experiment, the underlying principle used to measure the sustain of a guitar was quite simple.
    [Show full text]