DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE Main Justice Building Robert F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE Main Justice Building Robert F DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Main Justice Building Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530, phone (202) 514–2000 http://www.usdoj.gov ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, born in San Antonio, TX, August 4, 1955; education: Rice University, 1979; Harvard Law School, 1982; United States Air Force Acad- emy, 1977; military service: U.S. Air Force, 1973–75; professional: partner with law firm of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., 1982–94; taught law at University of Houston Law Center; President of the Houston Hispanic Bar Association, 1990–91; Texas General Counsel, 1994–97; Texas Secretary of State, 1997–99; Justice of the Texas Supreme Court, 1999–2001; Counsel to President George W. Bush, 2001–05; married: Rebecca Turner; children: Jared, Graham and Gabriel; nominated by George W. Bush to become the Attorney General of the United States on November 10, 2004, and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on February 3, 2005. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Main Justice Building, Room 5111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20530, phone (202) 514–2001 Attorney General.—Alberto R. Gonzales. Chief of Staff.—Ted W. Ullyot, room 5115, 514–3892. Deputy Chief of Staff and Counselor.—Kyle Sampson, room 5112, 514–1061. Senior Counselor to the Attorney General.—Raul Yanes, room 5110, 514–2291. Counselors to the Attorney General: Courtney Elwood, room 5123, 514–2267; Jeff Taylor, room 5116, 514–2107. Director of Scheduling and Advance.—Andrew A. Beach, room 5131, 514–4195. Deputy White House Liaison.—John Eddy, room 5224, 616–7740. Confidential Assistant to the Attorney General.—Carrie Nelson, room 5111, 514–2001. OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Main Justice Building, Room 4111, phone (202) 514–2101 Deputy Attorney General.—James Comey. Chief of Staff.—Chuck Rosenberg, room 4206, 514–2269. Associate Deputy Attorneys General: John Davis, room 4119, 514–0049; Uttam Dhillon, room 4214, 514–6753; David Margolis, room 4113, 514–4945; Catherine O’Neil, room 4212, 307–2090; Patrick Philbin, room 4222, 514–3744. Senior Counsels to the Deputy Attorney General: Chad Boudreaux, room 4116, 514–8086; Timothy J. Coleman, room 4121, 514–0020; Francesco Isgro, room 4112, 353–1957; James McAtamney, room 4311, 514–6907; Patrick O’Brien, room 4115, 305–3481; Stuart Nash, room 4131, 514–8694; Robert Tronto, room 4129, 514–8500. Counsels to the Deputy Attorney General: Dawn Burton, room 4210, 305–0091; Wendell Taylor, room 4220. Special Assistants to the Deputy Attorney General: Blair Birkeland, room 4215, 353–8878; James Rybicki, room 4216, 514–0438. Confidential Assistant to the Deputy Attorney General.—Linda Long, room 4111, 514–1904. Director, Faith Based and Community Initiatives Task Force.—Patrick Purtill, room 4409, 305–8283. Chief Science Advisor.—Vahid Majidi, room 4217, 305–7848. OFFICE OF THE ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building, Room 5706, phone (202) 514–9500 Associate Attorney General.—Robert D. McCallum, Jr., room 5706, 514–9500. Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General.—Brian D. Boyle, room 5708, 305–1434. Deputy Associate Attorneys General: Elizabeth Kessler, room 5722; Mike Wiggins, room 5724. 633 634 Congressional Directory Counsels to the Associate Attorney General: Luis Reyes, room 5732; Jeffrey Senger, room 5726. Confidential Assistant.—Currie Gunn, room 5706, 514–9500. OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION Director / Senior Counsel.—Linda Cinciotta, room 5734, 514–8910. OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Main Justice Building, Room 5143, phone (202) 514–2201 www.usdjoj.gov.osg Solicitor General.—Paul D. Clement (acting), 514–2206. Deputy Solicitors General: Edwin S. Kneedler, room 5137, 514–3261; Michael R. Dreeben, room 5623, 514–4285; Thornas G. Hungar, room 5137, 514–2211. Tax Assistant.—Malcolm Stewart, room 5633, 514–4218. Executive Officer.—Robert J. Faurot, room 5142, 514–5507. Executive Assistant.—Janet Potter, 514–2399. Legal Administrative Officer, Case Management Section.—Emily C. Spadoni, room 5614, 514–2218. Chief, Research and Publications Section.—G. Shirley Anderson, room 6636, 514–3914. OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building, Room 4322, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20530 phone (202) 514–3435 1425 New York Avenue, NW., 20530 Inspector General.—Glenn A. Fine. Deputy Inspector General.—Paul K. Martin. Counselor to the Inspector General.—Paul K. Martin. Special Counsel.—Scott S. Dahl. General Counsel.—Howard L. Sribnick (NYAV), Suite 6000, 616–0646. Assistant Inspectors General: Audit.—Guy K. Zimmerman (NYAV), Suite 5000, 616–4633. Evaluation and Inspections.—Paul A. Price (NYAV), Suite 6100, 616–4620. Investigations.—Thomas F. McLaughlin (NYAV), Suite 7100, 616–4760. Management and Planning.—Gregory T. Peters (NYAV), Suite 7000, 616–4550. Oversight and Review.—Carol F. Ochoa (RFK), Room 4722, 616–0645. OFFICE OF OVERSIGHT AND REVIEW Director.—Carol F. Ochoa, room 4726, 616–0645. REGIONAL AUDIT OFFICES Washington: Troy M. Meyer, 1300 N. 17th Street, Suite 3400, Arlington, VA 22209 (202) 616–4686. Computer Security and Information Technology Audit Office: Norman Hammonds, room 5000 (202) 616–3801. Financial Statement Audit Office: Marilyn A. Kessinger, 1110 Vermont Avenue, NW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20530 (202) 616–4660. Atlanta: Ferris B. Polk, Suite 1130, 75 Spring Street, Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 331–5928. Chicago: Carol S. Taraszka, Suite 3510, Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 353–1203. Dallas: Robert J. Kaufman, Room 575, Box 4, 207 South Houston Street, Dallas, TX 75202– 4724 (214) 655–5000. Denver: David M. Sheeren, Suite 1603, Chancery Building, 1120 Lincoln Street, Denver, CO 80203 (303) 864–2000. Philadelphia: Richard A. McGeary, Suite 201, 701 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 (215) 580–2111. San Francisco: David J. Gaschke, Suite 201, 1200 Bayhill Drive, San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 876–9220. Department of Justice 635 REGIONAL INVESTIGATIONS OFFICES Atlanta: Eddie D. Davis, 60 Forsyth Street, SW., Room 8M45, Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 562–1980. Boston: Thomas M. Hopkins, P.O. Box 2134, Boston, MA 02106 (617) 748–3218. Chicago: Edward M. Dyner, P.O. Box 1802, Chicago, IL 60690 (312) 886–7050. Colorado Springs: Craig Trautner, Suite 312, 111 S. Tejon Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 635–2366. Dallas: James H. Mahon, Suite 551, Box 5, 207 S. Houston Street, Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 655–5076. Detroit: Nicholas V. Candela, Suite 2001, 211 West Fort Street, Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226–4005. El Paso: Stephen P. Beauchamp, Suite 200, 4050 Rio Bravo, El Paso, TX 79902 (915) 577–0102. Houston: Fred C. Ball, Jr., P.O. Box 610071, Houston, TX 77208 (713) 718–4888. Los Angeles: Steve F. Turchek, Suite 655, 330 N. Brand Street, Glendale, CA 91203 (818) 543–1172. McAllen: Wayne D. Beaman, Suite 510, Bentsen Tower, 1701 W. Business Highway 83, McAllen, TX 78501 (956) 618–8145. Miami: Alan J. Hazen, Suite 312, 3800 Inverrary Boulevard, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33319 (954) 535–2859. New York: Ralph F. Paige, JFK Airport, P.O. Box 300999, Jamaica, NY 11430 (718) 553–7520. Philadelphia: Kenneth R. Connaughton, Jr., P.O. Box 43508, Philadelphia, PA 19106 (215) 861–8755. San Francisco: Norman K. Lau, Suite 220, 1200 Bayhill Drive, San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 876–9058. Seattle: Wayne Hawney, Suite 104, 620 Kirkland Way, Kirkland, WA 98033 (425) 828–3998. Tucson: William L. King, Jr., P.O. Box 471, Tucson, AZ 85702 (520) 670–5243. Washington: Charles T. Huggins, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 7100, Washington, DC 20530 (202) 616–4766. Fraud Detection Office.—David R. Glendinning, room 7100 (202) 616–4766. OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL Main Justice Building, Room 5218, phone (202) 514–2051 Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General.—Steven G. Bradbury, 514–2046. Deputy Assistant Attorney General—.Howard C. Nielson, Jr., room 5238, 514–2069. Special Counsels: Paul P. Colborn, room 5240, 514–2048; Daniel L. Koffsky, room 5268, 514–2030. Senior Counsel.—Rosemary A. Hart, room 5242, 514–2027. Chief of Staff.—Frits H. Geurtsen, room 5245, 305–9250. OFFICE OF LEGAL POLICY Main Justice Building, Room 4234, phone (202) 514–4601 Assistant Attorney General.—Daniel J. Bryant (acting). Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General.—Rachel Brand, room 4238, 616–0038. Deputy Assistant Attorneys General: Richard Hertling, room 4226, 514–9114; Kevin Jones, room 4250, 514–4604; Kristi Remington, room 4237, 514–8356; Frank Campbell, room 4245, 514–2283. Staff Director / Senior Counsel.—Erin Nealy Cox, room 4228, 305–0180. OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS Main Justice Building, Room 1220, phone (202) 514–2007 Director.—Tasia Scolinos. Deputy Directors: Kevin Madden, Gina M. Talamona. Senior Counsel.—John A. Nowacki. 636 Congressional Directory OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PRIVACY Flag Building, Suite 570, phone (202) 514–3642 Co-Directors: Richard L. Huff and Daniel J. Metcalfe. Deputy Director.—Melanie Ann Pustay. Associate Director.—Kirsten J. Moncada. Senior Counsel.—Janice G. McLeod. Chief, Initial Request Staff.—Carmen L. Mallon. Counsel, Initial Request Staff.—Tricia S. Wellman. OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE POLICY AND REVIEW Robert F. Kennedy Building, Room 6150, phone (202) 514–5600 Counsel.—James A. Baker. Deputy Counsels: Margaret A. Skelly-Nolen, Mark A. Bradley. Chief of Staff.—Sheryl Walter. OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., room 3266, phone (202) 514–3365 Counsel.—H. Marshall Jarrett. Deputy Counsel.—Judith B. Wish. Associate Counsels: William J. Birney, Paul L. Colby, James G. Duncan, Mary Anne Hoopes. Senior Assistant Counsels: Neil C. Hurley, Alexander S. White. Assistant Counsels: Kathleen Brandon, Mark G. Fraase, Lisa Griffin, Lyn A. Hardy, Tamara J. Kessler, Frederick C. Leiner, James Meade, Margaret S. McCarty, Simone E. Ross, Robert Thomson, Marlene M. Wahowiak, Barbara L. Ward, Karen A. Wehner. PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY ADVISORY OFFICE 1325 Pennsylvania Avenue, National Theater Building, Suite 500, phone (202) 514–0458 Director.—Claudia J. Flynn. Senior Advisor.—Barbara Kammerman. OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS Main Justice Building, Room 1145, phone (202) 514–2141 Assistant Attorney General.—William E.
Recommended publications
  • Mary Beth Buchanan United States Attorney
    United States Attorney’s Office Western District of Pennsylvania Mary Beth Buchanan United States Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan is the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania. She was appointed by President George W. Bush on September 5, 2001, and confirmed by the United States Senate on September 14, 2001. Ms. Buchanan is the first woman in Pennsylvania's history to be Presidentially appointed to this position. As United States Attorney, Ms. Buchanan oversees the prosecution of all federal crimes, and the litigation of civil matters in which the federal government has an interest, throughout the twenty-five counties in Western Pennsylvania. At the request of the Attorney General, Ms. Buchanan also served from June 2004 until June 2005 as the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys. This Washington D.C.-based office provides administrative support to the 94 United States Attorneys' Offices nationwide. Between April 2003 and May 2004, Ms. Buchanan served as chair of Attorney General John Ashcroft's Advisory Committee of United States Attorneys. This Committee counsels the Attorney General on law enforcement issues and plays an integral role in setting Department of Justice policy. She also serves on several subcommittees of Attorney General Ashcroft's Advisory Committee, including the Terrorism/National Security Subcommittee; the Violent Crime/Organized Crime Subcommittee; the White Collar Crime Subcommittee; the Civil Rights Subcommittee; and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Working Group. From February 2002 to 2004, she served on an Advisory Committee to the United States Sentencing Commission, which was established to study the effectiveness of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General
    U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation of Allegations of Politicized Hiring by Monica Goodling and Other Staff in the Office of the Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility Office of the Inspector General July 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................ i CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION................................................................. 1 I. Scope of the Investigation.................................................................. 1 II. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 III. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 5 I. Monica Goodling ............................................................................... 5 II. Kyle Sampson ................................................................................... 6 III. Susan Richmond and Jan Williams................................................... 7 IV. Department Components and Personnel ........................................... 7 V. Hiring Standards ............................................................................ 11 A. Department Career and Political Attorney Positions ............... 11 B. Legal Standards..................................................................... 12 CHAPTER THREE GOODLING’S ROLE
    [Show full text]
  • Battle Making the Calls T O the Usas. Let Us Know
    Scolinos. Tasia From: Scolinos, Tasia Sent: Friday, November 17,2006 2:00 PM To : '[email protected]' Subject: RE: USA replacement plan Thanks for flagging - we are not looped in - first I have heard of it. Let me call up there and figure out what is happening here and get back to you. Also, neither Brian nor I can be on the 3:30 call by the way - conflicting meetings - let me know if that is a problem. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:29 PM To: Scolinos, Tasia Subject: Fw: USA replacement plan Importance: High Are you looped in on this? What is your comms plan? -----Original Message----- From: Kelley, William K. To: Fiddelke, Debbie S.; Jennings, Jeffery S.; Martin, Catherine Sent: Fri Nov 17 12:32:06 2006 Subject: FW: USA replacement plan <<USA replacement plan.doc>> The email below, and the attached document, reflect a plan by DOJ to replace several US Attorneys. By statute, US Attorneys serve for four year terms, which are commonly (but not always) extended by inaction -- in practice, they serve until replaced. They serve at the pleasure of the President, but often have very strong home-state political juice, including with their Senators. Before executing this plan, we wanted to give your offices a heads up and seek input on changes that might reduce the profile or political fallout. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:02 AM To: Miers, Harriet; Kelley, William K.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys
    Rethinking the Identity and Role of United States Attorneys Sara Sun Beale* The reputation and credibility of the Department of Justice were badly tarnished during the Bush administration. This article focuses on concerns regarding the role of partisan politics.1 Critics charge that during the Bush administration improper partisan political considerations pervasively influenced a wide range of decisions including the selection of immigration judges, summer interns and line attorneys; the assignment of career attorneys to particular details; the evaluation of the performance of United States Attorneys; and the decision whether and when to file charges in cases with political ramifications. The Inspector General’s lengthy and highly critical reports have substantiated some of these charges.2 The first two Inspector General (IG) Reports found that the Department improperly used political criteria in hiring and assigning some immigration judges, interns, and career prosecutors.3 The third report * Charles L.B. Lowndes Professor, Duke Law School, Durham, N.C. I would like to acknowledge the outstanding research assistance provided by Michael Devlin, Meghan Ferguson, Amy Taylor, and Molly Brownfield, and the helpful comments of Norman Abrams, Albert Alschuler, Rachel Barkow, Anthony Barkow, Candace Carroll, Colm Connolly, Ronald Goldstock, Bruce Green, Lisa Kern Griffin, James Jacobs, Susan Klein, Daniel Richman, and Adam Safwat. Of course any errors are my own. 1 Other serious concerns about the Department have been raised, particularly in connection with its role in the war on terror. For example, the Department has been the subject of intense criticism for legal analysis that led to the authorization of brutal interrogation techniques for detainees.
    [Show full text]
  • Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
    LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon.
    [Show full text]
  • Disciplining Criminal Justice: the Peril Amid the Promise of Numbers
    YALE LAW & POLICY REVIEW Disciplining Criminal Justice: The Peril amid the Promise of Numbers Mary De Ming Fan* Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 Governing Governance and the Manufacture of "Objective" Visibility ............ 1O A. The Law of Making Performance Visible ................................................ 14 B. Difficulties Defining Criminal Justice in the Idiom of Targets .............. 16 C. Bending the Bounds of the Officially Sanctioned .................................. 24 II. Expressive, Expiatory "Deliverables". ............................................................. 27 A. At the Point of Policy Failure ................................................................... 30 B. Numbers that Do Not Attain Aims ......................................................... 36 C. What Expiation by Numerical Proxy Effaces ......................................... 42 1. Aim ing Beyond the Baseline ............................................................ 42 2. Effacing H igher Aim s ........................................................................ 49 III. Toward a Policy Embrace of Values and Numbers in Qualitative Context ... 57 A. Q ualitative Perspective ............................................................................ 57 B. How Law and Policy Can Be Conducive to Qualitative Evaluation ........... 59 C on clusion ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unofficial Transcript
    1 RPTS JOHNSON DCMN BURRELL COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WASHINGTON, D.C. UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT INTERVIEW OF: KARL C. ROVE Tuesday, July 7, 2009 Washington, D.C. The interview in the above matter was held at 2138 Conference Room, Rayburn House Office Building, commencing at 9:00 a.m. 2 Appearances: For COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: ADAM B. SCHIFF, MAJORITY MEMBER J. RANDY FORBES, MINORITY MEMBER ELLIOT MINCBERG, MAJORITY CHIEF COUNSEL - INVESTIGATIONS AND OVERSIGHT ERIC TAMARKIN, MAJORITY COUNSEL SAM BRODERICK-SOKOL, MAJORITY OVERSIGHT COUNSEL PHIL TAHTAKRAN, LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR FOR CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF DANIEL M. FLORES, CHIEF MINORITY COUNSEL, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW RICHARD ALAN HERTLING, REPUBLICAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF/POLICY DIRECTOR CRYSTAL ROBERTS JEZIERSKI, REPUBLICAN CHIEF OVERSIGHT COUNSEL ZACHARY N. SOMERS, MINORITY COUNSEL WILL HUPMAN, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT FOR CONGRESSMAN FORBES 3 For MR. ROVE: ROBERT D. LUSKIN, ESQ. KATIE BIBER, ESQ. Patton Boggs LLP Attorneys at Law 2550 M Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037-1350 For FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY: EMMET T. FLOOD, ESQ. Attorney at Law Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 For WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL'S OFFICE: JASON GREEN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL CHRIS WEIDEMAN, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL BLAKE ROBERTS, WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL For JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: 4 JOHN R. TYLER, CIVIL DIVISION 5 Mr. Schiff. We are here this morning for a transcribed interview of former White House official Karl Rove, pursuant to the March 4th, 2009 Agreement of Accommodation between the House Judiciary Committee and the former Bush administration. Mr. Rove, please state your full name and address for the record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2008 The oM st Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Bennett L. Gershman, The osM t Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor, 29 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2008), http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/ lawfaculty/558/. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PACE LAW REVIEW Volume 29 Fall 2008 Number 1 The James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture Pace Law School, October 25, 2008 The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman* 1. Introduction A. Judge James D. Hopkins This is the James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture in honor of Judge Hopkins, who was the Dean of Pace Law School from 1982 to 1983 and earlier served with great distinction on the New York Appellate Division's Second Judicial Department. Judge Hopkins served on that court when I worked in the spe­ cial prosecutor's office, and as head of the appeals bureau, I ar­ gued several cases in Judge Hopkins' court. One case stands out, the case ofSalvatore Nigrone v. Murtagh.! It was an exten­ sive undercover investigation. My office used informants, wire­ taps, and a sham arrest to expose corrupt attempts to influence criminal cases." As a result, a grand jury indicted three judges and two lawyers for perjury before the grandjury.3 On a motion * Professor of Law and James D.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE—Monday, May 14, 2007
    12280 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 153, Pt. 9 May 14, 2007 SENATE—Monday, May 14, 2007 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was morning business until 3 p.m. today, Arlington Cemetery is a place that called to order by the Honorable MARK with the time equally divided between every Member of Congress should go L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of the two leaders. once in a while. It is amazing to see all Arkansas. At 3 p.m., the Senate will begin con- those graves. I went, as I have on a sideration of H.R. 1495, the Water Re- number of occasions, to President Ken- PRAYER sources Development Act. Senators nedy’s grave site. We saw the eternal The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- BOXER and INHOFE are managing the flame. He is there with his two babies fered the following prayer: bill, and they will be here at 3 o’clock and his wonderful wife. Let us pray: ready to conduct business. There will We watched the changing of the Almighty God, smile on us and lift us be no rollcall votes today. guard at the Tomb of the Unknown with Your mighty strength. Develop in If there are no amendments on Tues- Soldier. We visited the Iwo Jima me- us an optimism that will withstand all day, the water resources bill would be morial—it is called the Marine Corps challenges, bear all burdens, and cata- ready for a vote. If there are no votes Memorial. Iwo Jima is mentioned pult all obstacles.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarnpson, Kyle
    Page 1 of I Sarnpson, Kyle From: Scott-Finan, Nancy Sent: Thursday, February 08,20071 :25 PM To: Sarnpson, Kyle; Goodling, Monica; Elston, Michael (ODAG); Moschella, William; Hertling, Richard; Seidel, Rebecca; Scolinos, Tasia Cc: Cabral, Catalina; Long, Linda E; Green, Saralene E Subject: FW:Letter to Gonzales 2.8.07 Attachments: Docurnent.pdf Senator Schurner's press secretary just ernailed me this SchurnerlReidlDurbinlMurrayletter with regard to CurnrninslGriffin. WASHINGTON, DC 20510 February 8,2007 The Honorable Alberto R. Gem-ales Attorney General of the United States U .S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Dear Attorney Gend Gonzales: As you know, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing this week to examine the growing politicization of the hiring and firing of United States Attorneys, our nation's top federal prosecutors. Unfortunately, the hearing only served to intensify, rather than assuage, our concerns, particdarly given the circumstances surrounding the ouster of Bud Curnnins, who was the U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of Arkansas until lasf December. When you testified before the Committee on January 18,2007, .you slated uncquivacally that you'5wauld never, ever make a change in a U.5. ASorney position far political reasons." In a stuukqg admission, however, Deputy Agarney Gene- McNulty, in his own testimony on February 6', acknowledgedbt Mr. Cutnmins was pushed out for no mason other thqta install - without Senate conairmation - Tim (irifin, a former aide to Karl Rove;) At the time, Mr. Griffin had minimal fe?deral porntian experience, but was highly skilled in opposition research and paraisan attacks for the Republican National Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor
    Pace Law Review Volume 29 Issue 1 Fall 2008 Article 1 September 2008 The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman Pace University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Bennett L. Gershman, The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor, 29 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2008) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol29/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\P\PLR\29-1\PLR101.txt unknown Seq: 1 27-FEB-09 14:04 PACE LAW REVIEW Volume 29 Fall 2008 Number 1 The James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture Pace Law School, October 25, 2008 The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman* I. Introduction A. Judge James D. Hopkins This is the James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture in honor of Judge Hopkins, who was the Dean of Pace Law School from 1982 to 1983 and earlier served with great distinction on the New York Appellate Division’s Second Judicial Department. Judge Hopkins served on that court when I worked in the spe- cial prosecutor’s office, and as head of the appeals bureau, I ar- gued several cases in Judge Hopkins’ court. One case stands out, the case of Salvatore Nigrone v. Murtagh.1 It was an exten- sive undercover investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mcnulty Memorandum, the KPMG Decision and Corporate Cooperation: Individual Rights and Legal Ethics
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2008 The McNulty Memorandum, the KPMG Decision and Corporate Cooperation: Individual Rights and Legal Ethics Sarah Helene Duggin The Catholic University of American, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Sarah Helene Duggin, The McNulty Memorandum, the KPMG Decision and Corporate Cooperation: Individual Rights and Legal Ethics, 21 GEO. J. LEGAL ETHICS 341 (2008). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2007 SYMPOSIUM The McNulty Memorandum, the KPMG Decision and Corporate Cooperation: Individual Rights and Legal Ethics SARAH HELENE DUGGIN* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CURRENT STATUS OF FEDERAL CORPORATE COOPERATION POLICIES AND ONGOING EFFORTS TO EFFECT ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGISLATIVE, AND DOCTRINAL CHANGE .................... 349 A. THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL CORPORATE COOPERATION POLICIES ............................. 349 B. THE McNULTY MEMORANDUM ..................... 356 1. PRINCIPAL PROVISIONS ............................ 357 a. W aiver Requests .............................. 357 b.
    [Show full text]