FIR No. 82/2020 PS Kishangarh State Vs Ramakant Jha U/S 392/411/34 IPC
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FIR No. 82/2020 PS Kishangarh State Vs Ramakant Jha U/s 392/411/34 IPC 30.05.2020 This is an application moved under Section 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant/accused Ramakant Jha seeking grant of bail. Present :- Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. None for applicant/accused. Learned counsel for applicant/accused has been contacted on phone and he states that he does not wish to make oral submissions. Reply filed by IO opposing the instant application. In the application, it is stated that the applicant/accused is in JC since 19.03.2020 and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession or at his instance and charge-sheet has already been filed. It is prayed that the bail be granted to the applicant/accused. Heard. Perused. As per reply, the alleged snatch mobile phone has been recovered from the accused persons and the alleged offence was committed during day hours and the allegations against the applicant/accused are serious in nature. For these reasons, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant/accused, at this stage. The application is accordingly disposed of. Proceedings be sent to the Court concerned through proper channel. Copy be also sent to concerned Jail Superintendent for intimation and necessary record and also be provided dasti to Ld. Counsel for accused. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR No. 285/2020 PS Kishangarh State Vs Bablu @ Amit U/s 354/354A/323/506/509 IPC 30.05.2020 This is an application moved under Section 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant/accused Bablu @ Amit seeking grant of bail. Present :- Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused through VC. Reply has been filed by IO opposing the instant application. Before deciding the instant application, this Court deems it appropriate to hear the victim of the present case and hence let the victim of the present case be notified through IO for NDOH. She be also apprised about the option of her appearance through video-conferencing and phone number of Reader / Ahlmad of the Court concerned be also intimated to her by IO for assistance. Application be relisted on 02.06.2020. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR No. 129/2020 PS Sagar Pur State Vs Rohan @ Chottu U/s 356/379/411 IPC 30.05.2020 This is an application moved under Section 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant/accused Rohan @ Chottu seeking grant of interim bail for 45 days. Present :- Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. Sh. A K Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. It is stated in the application that the applicant/accused has been falsely framed in the present case and is in JC since 16.03.2020 and charge- sheet has already been filed. Reply has been filed by IO opposing the instant application and it is stated that the applicant/accused is previously involved in the similar offences and he can jump bail, if granted. Heard. File perused. As per reply of the IO, there is no conviction of the applicant/accused in the similar offence and the offences alleged are covered under the category of offences mentioned in the Minutes of Meetings dated 14.05.2020 through Video-conferencing under the Chairpersonship of Hon'ble Justice Ms. Hima Kohli, Judge, High Court of Delhi and Executive Chairperson, Delhi State Legal Service Authority and in view of directions / guidelines given by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the judgment titled as Shobha Gupta Vs. Union of India in WP (C) NO. 2945/2020 dated 23.03.2020 owing to the emergency situation to the pandemic Covid-19, let applicant/accused Rohan @ Chottu be released on interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of this order subject to furnishing of personal bond in a sum of Rs.15,000/- to the satisfaction of Ld. Jail Magistrate concerned. The application is accordingly disposed of. Applicant/accused Rohan @ Chottu is directed to surrender before concerned Jail Superintendent accordingly. Proceedings be sent to the Court concerned through proper channel. Copy be also sent to concerned Jail Superintendent for intimation and necessary record and also be provided dasti to Ld. Counsel for accused. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR No. 16/2020 PS Parliament Street State Vs Vikas Kumar U/s 420/468/471/120B IPC 30.05.2020 This is an application moved under Section 437 Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant/accused Vikas Kumar seeking grant of bail. Present :- Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ld. LAC for applicant/accused. It is stated in the application that the applicant/accused is on interim bail till 03.06.2020 and investigation of the present case is already completed and judicial custody of the present case is no more required. Reply has been filed by IO opposing the instant application and it is stated that other accused persons are absconding and the fact of certain documents were made and printed is yet to be verified and if regular bail is granted, there is a possibility of tampering with the evidence. Heard. File perused. The allegations are serious in nature, investigation of the present case is still underway and could not be completed due to pandemic of Covid-19 and other accused persons i.e. Shrikant Suman, Chandan Kumar and Sanjay Kumar are evading arrest and hence the possibility of tampering with the evidence cannot be denied at this stage. In view of the reasons, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the applicant/accused. The application is accordingly disposed of. Proceedings be sent to the Court concerned through proper channel. Copy be also sent to concerned Jail Superintendent for intimation and necessary record and also be provided dasti to Ld. Counsel for accused. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR NO 08/2013 STATE VS HEMANT PS SPECIAL CELL U/S 25 ARMS ACT 30.05.2020 Present : Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. None for applicant/accused Hemant. Ld. counsel for applicant/accused has been contacted through telephone and he states that he is unable to make appearance through video- conference as he is hospitalized. Further, reply has not been filed by IO. In these circumstances, IO is directed to file reply positively on 04.06.2020. Matter be relisted on 04.06.2020. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR NO 130/2020 STATE VS VISHESH JANGIR PS SPECIAL CELL U/S 419/420 IPC & 66C/66D IT ACT 30.05.2020 This is an application under Section 437 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of applicant/accused Vishesh Jangir seeking grant of bail. Present : Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. Sh. Gaurav Singh, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Vishesh Jangir through VC. Ld. counsel for applicant/accused submits that the applicant/accused is in JC since 25.05.2020 and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant/accused. He prays for grant of bail to the applicant/accused. Reply filed by the IO mentioning that the investigation of the present case is at initial stage and a large of victims who have been duped are likely to turn up to join investigation and are yet to be examined. On the other hand, Ld. APP for the State has opposed the instant bail application by stating that the allegations against the applicant/accused are serious in nature. Heard. Perused. Since, the investigation of the present case is at nascent stage and a large number of victims are yet to be examined, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the applicant/accused, at this stage. Proceedings be sent to the Court concerned through proper channel. Copy be also sent to concerned Jail Superintendent for intimation and necessary record and also be provided dasti to Ld. Counsel for accused. (PREETI PAREWA) DMM/PHC/ND/30.05.2020 FIR NO 28/2020 STATE VS JAHID ALI PS SOUTH CAMPUS U/S 392/411/34 IPC 30.05.2020 This is an application under Section 437 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of applicant/accused Jahid Ali seeking grant of bail. Present : Sh. Lalan Kumar, Ld. APP for the State through VC. Sh. A K Sheoran, Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Jahid Ali through VC. Ld. counsel for applicant/accused submits that the applicant/accused is in JC since 13.03.2020 and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing recovery has been recovered from the possession of the applicant/accused and investigation qua him is completed. He prays for grant of bail to the applicant/accused. Reply filed by the IO mentioning that the robbed mobile has not yet been recovered and the charge-sheet of the present case has already been filed before the concerned Court. On the other hand, Ld. APP for the State has opposed the instant bail application by stating that the allegations against the applicant/accused are serious in nature. Heard. Perused. Applicant/accused has been in custody in the present case since 13.03.2020, charge-sheet of the present case has already been filed and the alleged stolen mobile phone has not been recovered as yet.