Karow· Font Technology Peter Karow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Karow· Font Technology Peter Karow Karow· Font Technology Peter Karow FontTechnology Methods and Tools Foreword by Gerard Unger With 306 Figures Springer -V erlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest Peter Karow URW Software & Type GmbH Harksheider StraEe 102 D-22399 Hamburg Germany Authorized Rewording by Bill Horton Original German title: Schrifttechnologie CR-Klassifikation (1994): 1.7.2, J.7 ISBN-13:978-3-642-78507-8 e-ISBN-13:978-3-642-78505-4 DOl: 10.1007/978-3-642-78505-4 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Karow, Peter, 1940- [Schrifttechnologie. English 1Font Technology: methods and tools / Peter Karow. p. cm. Translation of: Schrifttechnologie. ISBN-13:978-3-642-78507-8 (U.S.: alk. paper) 1. Type and type-founding - Digital techniques 1. Title. Z250. 7.K3813 1994 686.2' 21- dc20 94-6963 CIP This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1994 The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Typesetting: URW Software & Type GmbH, Hamburg Cover design: Konzept & Design, Ilvesheim SPIN: 10085141 33/3140-543 2 10 Printed on acid-free paper. Preface Preface handful of metal type is tangible evidence of that which A has changed in the type industry over the past thirty years. The early seventies marked the onset of a revolution having had a direct and far-reaching effect on typography. Still very much in progress, this technological revolution transfor­ med typography (once a craft with tools that could be picked up and handled) into an activity using essentially abstract tech­ niques. Social, cultural and economic factors have also made their mark, altering the entire image of the typographer's craft. The bulk of these changes could not, however, have taken hold as rapidly if new technologies had not enabled designers and typographers to implement their far-reaching ideas. Prior to this revolution, 500 years saw slight change in the typographer's craft. Setting became mechanized in the nine­ teenth century, along with the printing press and allied equip­ ment. Machines delivered increasing precision as the century progressed. Yet were a typesetter from a previous age - say, from the Venetian workshop of Aldus Manutius in the final decade of the 15th century - to travel through time to the first half of the 20th century, he could still find metal letters to work with, albeit machine-produced ones. The lead-alloy lines of type produced by Linotype machines would have astounded him - all letters being set individually in the 15th century - but our Venetian would not have been at a loss to know how it would be used. Triggering the revolution was the introduction of filmset- Triggering ting machines, with letters existing solely as visible images on the revolution negative film. Digital setting machines soon followed, the first, the Digi­ set of Dr.-Ing. Rudolf Hell in 1965. No analog letters were to be found in these machines; having disintegrated into mere com­ puter codes. The transitional step from tangible to abstract characters was fraught with problems. V Preface Frequently it was the case that technology makers and users devoted far greater attention to the new machines themselves than to the quality of their resulting products. Typography suf­ fered greatly by low resolution, blurred contours of characters, copied fonts that were no longer the work of trained specia­ lists. Typographers often had little choice than to use these new tools, since traditional production methods had either evaporated or become too expensive. Many typographers visualized a gloomy future for their craft, seeing no cause for jubilation in new technology. Others, less concerned, attempted to preserve print letters for better times ahead, even restoring some of typography's lost quali­ More from new ties. Some even strove to achieve more from new technologies technologies than ever possible with the old. One typographer (for whom than ever possible the title applies honoris causa) of this caliber is Peter Karow. with the old. Since his lKARUS system was first introduced to the world of graphic arts in 1975, he has become, and remains, one of the industry's most prominent pace-setters: a locomotive for change who harnesses new technologies to our current needs. Once the initial furor over new technologies had died down, the typographic arena looked forward to more peaceful times, promising long-sought restoration of quality and further refinements. Even then, a fresh, new revolution was brewing. The soaring popularity of desktop publishing, with its Macin­ toshes, pes, PostScript and other far-reaching innovations, is such an oft-told chapter in the history of typography that no further explanation is required here. Still, as it began short time ago, we remain currently in the midst of it. Even the most seeming unshakeable structures of the type craft, in its older forms, have been jolted by recent develop­ ments. Some companies, previously supplying metal type, remained in business by converting to photographic and/or digital setting machines, sharing the market with the newly­ founded enterprises. Others, less flexible in their thinking, ceased to exist. Yet, typographers still ventured out of their homes or offices for typesetting. Today, many stay at home, purchasing software fonts from manufacturers unknown in the old industry. Typogra­ phers can process fonts which either they or others have pro­ duced. Old hierarchies and marketing structures have been shaken to the core, some vanishing altogether. Type products VI from globally diverse sources can be used on a range of ma- Preface chines. (Being home-based, can present a problem in itself, though such implications have yet to dawn on many typogra­ phers. The machines themselves bind their operators more clo­ sely to their desks making typography an even more sedentary job. As this book was not prepared to instruct physical exercise or work-outs, perhaps a suggestion of getting out and about, for instance riding a racing bike, might provide a solution.) Today's developments have engendered still other pro­ blems for typographers. Technological innovations augment rather than supplant one another, with typographic possibili­ ties continually expanding. Innovations occur so quickly, many people haven't a ghost of a chance of keeping informed. Typefaces can be modified ad infinitum and weights adjusted in such minute increments that some differences are no longer visible to the naked eye. The whole typographic palette - pre­ viously white and black - becomes infinitely varied, to be mol­ ded, swapped about, modified in color, combined with images and so on. Typography has become a veritable «land of milk and honey». Yet to know the craft like the back of one's hand, a typo- A typographer grapher must be a keen specialist, a task requiring abundant must be a keen information, specialist information. In fact, valuable informa- specialist. tion is spread very thin on the ground. For example, it's amaz- ing how dreadful some technical manuals are, even those for the most frequently used programs. Structure is often illogical, descriptions unclear, specialized technical terms are incorrect- ly applied, to name only a few shortcomings. It appears that our problem is not so much one of mastering those functions and features at our disposal, but of understanding the whys and wherefores of doing so: how do our machines and pro- grams actually work? How often have you wished that some- one might finally explain, clearly and concisely, what is going on? Most of us simply react to what is displayed on the screen, without the slightest idea of underlying hardware or software principles. It is only human, of course, to blindly trust techno- logy without understanding how things work - say to happily cruise along in our cars without a clue of what is happening under the hood! It is reasonable that typographers may not fully compre­ hend the ins and outs of all the hardware they use. A well­ implemented service contract from the manufacturer should solve hardware-related problems. So much for the motor and VII Preface the hood. (Certain colleagues, incredibly enough, still main­ tain as a direct solution to any problem: pull the plug). Soft­ ware, replete with its effects on typographic design, is a far dif­ ferent matter. It is essential that typographers grasp basic prin­ .... , but some ciples. I do not advocate programmer training, but some minimal insight minimal insight into the basic elements of programs is impera­ into the basic tive. Again arises the question of where to find the necessary elements of programs information in an easy-to-understand form. This is the book! is imperative. Its author is an experienced software specialist, someone already striving to improve digital typographic quality while it was still in its cradle days. All fields produce specialists - while others have «specia­ lized specialists» as well; absolute experts in their specific fields, but blinded to what is happening beyond their own back­ yards. Program developers and typographers are no different in this respect. Therefore it is a welcome change to meet a per­ son devoting his efforts and attention to computers and typo­ graphy alike.
Recommended publications
  • Digital Typography and Artificial Intelligence
    Peter Karow, Hamburg Digital Typography and Artificial Intelligence When did typefaces become digital? The target in 1972 : Automation of Photo Typesetting Our desktop in 1974 Our “PC” in 1980 50 M B m ass storage 2 .5 M B disks 2 m e t e r s h i g h First Ikarus brochure, Warsaw 1975 Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Grayscaling 8. Element separation Subjects of digitizing Results Bitmap (left) Run length (middle) Vector (right) PostScript (left) Elements (middle) Metafont (right) Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Grayscaling 8. Element separation Range of Variations 1. Continuous Enlarging 2. Contouring 3. Italizing (not Slanting) 4. Expanding/Condensing 5. Rounding 6. Shadowing 7. Antiquing In 1973, the first variations of typefaces were calculated as such: contouring and shadowing It was the birth of digital typefaces. Contouring The font “Ice Age” with variations Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Grayscaling 8. Element separation Interpolation of hybrids Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Grayscaling 8. Element separation Typical accidents from rasterizing (left) Various resolutions Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Grayscaling 8. Element separation Basic hints in 1985 17 hints after the first refinements in 1987 Digital Typefaces 1. Formats 2. Variations 3. Interpolation 4. Rasterizing 5. Hinting 6. Autotracing 7. Gray scaling 8. Element separation Autotracing has to recognize at least the following elements: Digital Typefaces 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts
    DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MARATHWADA UNIVERSITY, AURANGABAD Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts Advanced Diploma in Printing Technology & Graphic Arts 1.5 years-3 semesters course New Credit based syllabus 2011 Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts SCHEME FOR CHOICE BASED CREDIT SYSTEM (CBCS) AND AWARDING GRADES TO THE STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS w.e.f. June, 2011 (Academic Year, 2011-2012) The CBCS System University Departments have adopted a credit-based system under the Academic Flexibility Programme of the University from the academic year 2011-2012. This provides the flexibility to make the system more responsive to the changing needs of our students, the professionals and society. It gives greater freedom to students to determine their own pace of study. The credit-based system also facilitates the transfer of credits. I. Admission / Promotion Admission to the course in the concern department will be done on the performance of CET score and / or their performance in the qualifying graduate level examination. The student will apply on the application form of the University provided with the prospectus. Once the student is admitted to the concern department/ course, he/ she will be promoted to next semester with full carryon; subject to the registration of student in every consecutive semester. Dropout student will be allowed to register for respective semester as and when the concerned courses are offered by the department, subject to the condition that his/her tenure should not exceed more than twice the duration of course from the date of first registration at parent department. The admission of concern student will be automatically get cancelled if he/she fails to complete the course in maximum period (Four years/ Eight semesters).
    [Show full text]
  • TEX: a Branch in Desktop Publishing Evolution, Part 2
    HISTORY OF DESKTOP PUBLISHING: BUILDING THE INDUSTRY THEME ARTICLE: HISTORY OF DESKTOP PUBLISHING: BUILDING THE INDUSTRY TEX: A Branch in Desktop Publishing Evolution, Part 2 Donald Knuth began the development of TEX in 1977 and had an initial version running in 1978, with the Barbara Beeton American Mathematical Society aim of typesetting mathematical documents with the Karl Berry highest quality, and with archival reproducibility far TEX Users Group into the future. Its usage spread, and today the TEX David Walden system remains in use by a vibrant user community. However, the world of TEX has always been somewhat out of sync with the commercial desktop publishing systems that began to come out in the mid-1980s and are now ubiquitous in the worlds of publishing and printing. Part 1 of this history (Annals vol. 40, no. 3) was about the creation of TEX at Stanford and how it began to spread. This part is about (a) the expansion of TEX-based and TEX-related technology, and development of a worldwide community of TEX users and developers following the lead of Knuth’s original collaboration model, and (b) the impact TEX has had on the broader world. In Part 1 we were primarily talking about TEX as developed by Knuth. In Part 2 we sometimes speak of (LA)TEX, meaning TEX or LATEX but mostly LATEX. We also often say TEX when we mean TEX and everything that has been built on top of and around TEX; we hope the distinction between the TEX program itself and these extended meanings is clear from the context.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers' Bios
    Press Past Review Home Hotel Program Contact Us Room Events Committee Speaker Biographies Keynote Speaker: Vinton G. Cerf Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist, Google Vinton G. Cerf is the Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist at Google. Cerf has served as vice president and chief Internet evangelist for Google since October 2005. In this role, he is responsible for identifying new enabling technologies to support the development of advanced, Internet-based products and services from Google. He is also an active public face for Google in the Internet world. Cerf is widely known as one of the "Fathers of the Internet," Cerf is the co-designer of the TCP/IP protocols and the architecture of the Internet. In December 1997, President Clinton presented the U.S. National Medal of Technology to Cerf and his colleague, Robert E. Kahn, for founding and developing the Internet. Kahn and Cerf were named the recipients of the ACM Alan M. Turing award in 2004 for their work on the Internet protocols. The Turing award is sometimes called the "Nobel Prize of Computer Science." In November 2005, President George Bush awarded Cerf and Kahn the Presidential Medal of Freedom for their work. The medal is the highest civilian award given by the United States to its citizens. In April 2008, Cerf and Kahn received the prestigious Japan Prize. For a more detailed bio please click here. Speakers: Mr. Adil Allawi Director, Diwan Software Adil Allawi has been working on Arabic computing and multilingual software since 1982 and as such takes personal responsibility for all the problems that bi-di algorithms have caused to the Arabic language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multiple Master Based Method for Scaling Glyphs Without Changing the Stroke Characteristics
    A Multiple Master based method for scaling glyphs without changing the stroke characteristics Tim Ahrens This essay was originally written as part of the MA Typeface Design programme at the University of Reading in 2006. It was later published in the academic journals Document Numérique and Digital Creativity. The method described here has been implemented as Font Remix Tools, a set of plugins for FontLab and Glyphs. Abstract This article presents methods for handling Multiple Masters (several type styles such as regular and bold joined in one font file) beyond the conventional applications such as generating semibold fonts. The “bold- ness” information in an MM font can be used to change the size of glyphs without changing the stroke weight. The method helps to create small caps, Cyrillic lowercase and – since the horizontal and vertical scale fac- tors can be chosen independently – even true condensed fonts. Comparisons to existing typefaces with designed small caps and con- densed versions show that the output generated by the model is rather close to that of the true glyphs. In contrast to “intelligent” data formats that generate glyphs, the model suggested here is a technology-independent formula for the processing of pre-existing shapes. The output has the same format as the input and can be subsequently modified, making the method a tool for the auto- mation of a specific design step rather than a stand-alone technology. A Multiple Master based method for scaling glyphs without changing the stroke characteristics Tim Ahrens 1. OBJECTIVES 2. ThE mEThOd A first simple approach More specific control over the stroke weight Anisotropic scaling Taking into account italic angles Optical sizes Scaling the bold master and enlarging Spacing and Kerning Notes on the actual scale factor Implementation Equalising the input 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Unicode Support in Fontlab Studio 5
    Improved Unicode support in FontLab Studio 5 Adam Twardoch Improved Unicode support in FontLab Studio 5 Frankfurt (Oder), April 2005. Version 1.0 he new generation of FontLab’s professional font editors (FontLab Studio 5 and AsiaFont Studio 5) includes numerous improvements relevant for Unicode T font developers. We present some of the feature highlights: better support for Unicode 4.1, support for advanced layout technologies (improved OpenType Layout support and new AAT support), greatly improved class-based kerning and metrics. We discuss the key improvements in FontLab Studio 5 that are helpful in the process of designing and developing fonts for Unicode environments. We focus on the issues of glyph naming and encoding as the crucial prerequisite for creating a functioning Uni- code-compatible font. We present guidelines for glyph naming and encoding and discuss two specific case studies that demonstrate their practical application. Fontlab Ltd. [1] is an international software vendor that has stayed at the forefront of digital font management by remaining devoted to developing font editors and typography products. Their full line of products is dedicated to solving the most com- plex typography issues. These products include: FontLab, AsiaFont Studio, ScanFont, TypeTool, SigMaker, TransType, CompoCompiler, BitFonter and FONmaker. The Font- lab Ltd. team works in offices in Canada, Germany, Panama, Russia and USA. With FontLab Studio 5 and AsiaFont Studio 5, software developers and type designers are able to create professional-quality Unicode-savvy OpenType fonts: either from new artwork or by converting their existing font libraries from legacy formats. Adam Twardoch [2] is Scripting Products and Marketing Manager at Fontlab Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Punch Cutting
    h ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING, VOL . 4(3), 151±170 (SEPTEMBER 1991) Digital punch cutting PETER KAROW URW Harksheider Straûe 102 2000 Hamburg 65 GERMANY SUMMARY Digital punch cutting is today's font technology. There are three different methods available for getting alphabets into digital form : hand-digitizing, auto-tracing and direct design on a workstation screen. The advent of intelligent font scaling requires us to ensure the `optical' quality of a font and also the `numerical' quality of its data; this, in turn, means that new procedures have to be added to the font production process. Furthermore, a given typeface has to be rendered on a wide variety of output devices ranging from computer displays, printers (dot-matrix, laser, inkjet or thermal-transfer) and typesetters (CRT or laser) to the more exotic devices such as plotters, vinyl-cutters and routers. To deal with this it is necessary to set up a database of font data, in a machine-independent format such as IKARUS. This enables us to cope with the long life cycles of typefaces and also to serve present and future applications by converting the IKARUS data into various machine-speci®c formats. KEY WORDS Digital typefaces Hand-digitizing IKARUS format Auto-tracing Font technology Intelligent font scaling 1 INTRODUCTION It is becoming ever more apparent that we at URW are treading a new path in the handling of typefaces with the IKARUS system. In particular, the method of hand- digitizing plays an important role in this ®eld; but this is a technique which seems dif®cult for typographic `insiders' to justify and for `outsiders' to understand (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts
    DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MARATHWADA UNIVERSITY, AURANGABAD Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts Bachelor of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts 3 years-6 semesters course New Credit based syllabus 2011 Department of Printing Technology & Graphic Arts SCHEME FOR CHOICE BASED CREDIT SYSTEM (CBCS) AND AWARDING GRADES TO THE STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS w.e.f. June, 2011 (Academic Year, 2011-2012) The CBCS System University Departments have adopted a credit-based system under the Academic Flexibility Programme of the University from the academic year 2011-2012. This provides the flexibility to make the system more responsive to the changing needs of our students, the professionals and society. It gives greater freedom to students to determine their own pace of study. The credit-based system also facilitates the transfer of credits. I. Admission / Promotion Admission to the course in the concern department will be done on the performance of CET score and / or their performance in the qualifying graduate level examination. The student will apply on the application form of the University provided with the prospectus. Once the student is admitted to the concern department/ course, he/ she will be promoted to next semester with full carryon; subject to the registration of student in every consecutive semester. Dropout student will be allowed to register for respective semester as and when the concerned courses are offered by the department, subject to the condition that his/her tenure should not exceed more than twice the duration of course from the date of first registration at parent department. The admission of concern student will be automatically get cancelled if he/she fails to complete the course in maximum period (Four years/ Eight semesters).
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Issue 13:4 As One Pdf (12Mb)
    The Communications of the Users Group Volume 13, Number 4, December 1992 Users Group Board of Directors Memberships and Subscriptions Donald Knuth, Grand Wizard of m-arcanat TUGboat (ISSN 0896-3207) is published four times Malcolm Clark, President* a year plus one supplement by the rn Users Ken Dreyhaupt*, Vice President Group. As of December 1, 1992, the TUG office is Bill Woolf * , Treasurer moving from 653 North Main Street, P. 0.Box 9506, Peter Flynn*, Secretary Providence, RI 02940, U.S. A., to Balboa Building, Peter Abbott, Vice-president for UKWUG Room 307, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA Bernard Gaulle, Vice-president for GUTenberg 93101, U.S.A. Roswitha Graham, Vice-President for the Nordic countries 1993 dues for individual members are as follows: Kees van der Laan, Vice-president for NTG Ordinary members: $60 Joachim Lammarsch, Vice-President for DANTE rn Students: $30 Barbara Beeton Membership in the TfjX Users Group is for the cal- Luzia Dietsche endar year, and includes all issues of TUGboat and Michael Ferguson and TUG News for the year in which member- Raymond Goucher, Founding Executive Director' ship begins or is renewed. Individual membership Yannis Haralambous is open only to named individuals, and carries with Doug Henderson it such rights and responsibilities as voting in the Alan Hoenig annual election. A membership form is provided on Anita Hoover page 000. Mimi Jett TUGboat subscriptions are available to organi- David Kellerman zations and others wishing to receive TUGboat in a Nico Poppelier name other than that of an individual. Subscription Jon Radel rates: North America $60 a year; all other countries, Christina Thiele delivery by surface mail $60, by air mail $80.
    [Show full text]
  • Tex Font Sampler
    1 1 TEX FONT SAMPLER 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 Introduction Thanks to the work of different groups within the TEX world we may occasionally welcome new fonts. In the year of TEX’s 25th anniversary we introduce the Latin Modern typefaces as a successor to the familiar Computer Modern typefaces. The development of the Latin Modern was funded by DANTE, GUTENBERG and the NTG. This booklet ships with the new TEX Collection 2003: TEX Live 9/2003 and CTAN. It gives an overview of the free out- line fonts available in this collection and provides some back- ground information concerning those fonts, their designers and the foundries involved. We dedicate this booklet to Sebas- tian Rahtz. Without him and his team, most TEX documents would still look like they did 25 years ago. We also use this opportunity to present the new Fourier math font by Michel Bovani. This font is based upon Utopia and can be found in the TEX collection. Hans Hagen Willi Egger TEX FONT SAMPLER 3 3 4 4 TEX FONT SAMPLER 4 4 5 5 Showcase of fonts We start this booklet with a showcase of character represen- tations. Recognizing a font is not trivial. We hope that this showcase will provide you some insight in the subtle differ- ences between fonts. TEX FONT SAMPLER 5 5 6 6 TEX FONT SAMPLER 6 6 7 7 a a a Latin Modern Serif Bookman Antykwa Toruńska a a a Schoolbook Palatino Times a a a Charter Utopia Antykwa Półtawskiego TEX FONT SAMPLER 7 7 8 8 TEX FONT SAMPLER b b b Latin Modern Serif Bookman Antykwa Toruńska b b b Schoolbook Palatino Times b b b Charter Utopia Antykwa Półtawskiego 8
    [Show full text]
  • The TEX Font Panel
    The TEX Font Panel Nelson H. F. Beebe (chair) Center for Scientific Computing University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 322 INSCC 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe Telephone: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 585 1640, +1 801 581 4148 Introduction them, changing the character set has huge ramifica- tions for the computing industry and for worldwide The TUG’2001 Font Panel convened on Thursday, business data processing, data exchange, and record August 16, 2001, with members William Adams, keeping. Nelson H. F. Beebe (chair), Barbara Beeton, Hans Fortunately, a particular encoding scheme called Hagen, Alan Hoenig, and Ross Moore, with active UTF-8 makes it possible for files encoded in pure participation by several attendees in the audience. ASCII to also be Unicode in UTF-8 encoding, easing The list of topics that was projected on the screen the transition to the new character set. makes up the sectional headings in what follows, and Up to version 2.0 in 1996, the Unicode character the topics are largely independent. repertoire could be fit into a table of 216 = 65 536 en- Any errors or omissions in this article are solely tries. Version 3.0 in 2000 increased the count to over the fault of the panel chair. a million, although just under 50 000 are assigned Unicode and tabulated in the book. Version 3.2 in 2002 has just over 95 000 assigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Dtl [Fontmaster] Track Brighton, Thursday 13 September 2007
    atypi typetech forum dtl [FontMaster] Track brighton, thursday 13 september 2007 09.50 hrs OpenType: Font Naming & the Name Table Thomas Phinney is as Program Manager at Thomas Phinney, Adobe Systems Inc., usa Adobe Systems involved in the technical, design, historical and business aspects of type, How to obtain appropriate OpenType font naming and how to as well as working closely with other font handle this for instance in FontLab Studio and dtl FontMaster. developers and customers. His typeface Hypatia Sans is an upcoming Adobe Originals release. 10.35 hrs Re-inventing technology Thomas has worked with Adobes’ type Peter Rosenfeld, urw++, Germany group for nine years, currently as program manager for fonts and sing technologies, Much of the actual font technology finds its origin in the based in Seattle. He has a Master’s degree in ikarus system, invented by Dr. Peter Karow in the early 1970’s typography and design from rit, and a mba and developed till this day by urw++ under supervision of from uc Berkeley. Dr. Jürgen Willrodt. An historical overview and explanation of more than thirty Peter Rosenfeld started, after finishing his years of Spitzentechnologie. business studies in 1980, his first position in the font production department at Dr. Hell in Kiel, a once well-known company in the area of 11.15 hrs •Break crt/laser composing and scanning systems. It was there where he first got in touch with digital type, (still in bitmap form at that time). 11.30 hrs ms volt: Questions and Answers Peter joined urw in Hamburg in 1982 Peter Constable, Microsoft Corp., usa and a little later he became the manager of the urw font studio.
    [Show full text]