DOCSLIB.ORG

Mercer County Comprehensive Plan October 1995

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mercer County Comprehensive Plan October 1995 Mercer County Comprehensive Plan October 1995 I I Pw&A&&- .. Mercer County Comprehensive Plan I I I I I t 1 t I I I I 1 I I The preparation of this report was financed in part by a SPAG grant from the Department of Community Affairs under the provisions of Act 6A approved June 16, 1994, as administered by 4 the Bureau of Community Planning, Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs. /I .I Table of Contents I Acknowledgments Historic resources ....................... 49 Cultural resources ....................... 50 I 9- Prospects for Growth .................. 52 Future growth potential .................. 52 Introduction ............................ 1 Population projections ................... 53 I Why a comprehensive plan? ................ 1 Legal status of a comprehensive plan ........ 1 Two phases ............................. 2 P& %e4z4+s I Livable communities theme ................ 2 Policy Plan process ....................... 3 Regional Public Meetings ............... 55 Planning regions ......................... 4 Major issues ........................... 55 1 Livable communities .................... 55 Lakeview regional public meeting .......... 56 74& 3U44u Shenango Valley regional public meeting .... 58 I Existing Land Use .... Public Opinion Survey ................. 60 Land use analysis .... Major issues ........................... 60 Subdivision activity . Livable communities .................... 62 I Agricultural activity . Regional perspectives .................... 63 Representativeness of the survey ........... 63 Demographics ......................... 13 I Population characteristics ................ 13 Households ........... ... ... 19 I 23 Purpose of the Policy Plan ............. 65 23 How developed ......................... 65 1 Mercer County Housing Commission findings 24 Purpose and use ........................ 65 Economic Characteristics ............. 31 Vision Statement ....................... 67 Employment trends ...................... 3 1 Ingredients for livable communities ..67 Unemployment ......................... 33 Industrial growth ....................... 35 Policy Objectives . ..68 Availability Of industrial sites ............. 35 General policy objective on gro Retail trade ............................ 36 1 Income & poverty ....................... 37 Findings of the Mercer County C.E.R.P study 40 1 Community Faciliti Water facilities ... Sanitary sewer systems Agriculture ............................ 71 I Miscellaneous .......................... 71 Natural, Historic 8 Cultural Resources . 46 Planning & land use controls ..... 72 Physical Features ....................... 46 Natural resources ................. Appendix 1 1 List of Maps 1 Map Following Page I Planning Regions , . , . , , , , . , . , . , . 4 L Mercer County Generalized Land Use , , . , . , . , . , . 6 Shenango Valley Generalized Land Use , . 6 I Land Use Transition Areas. , , . 6 I Water Systems Service Areas. , . , . , . 44 Sanitary Sewer Systems Service Areas, , . , , . , . 44 I TopographicFeatures ......................................... 46 I Soils ...................................................... 46 I Agricultural Security Areas . , . , , . , . , , . 50 1 I I I I I I I I Acknowledgments I Mercer County set out early to make the Mercer County Comprehensive Plan a publicly-owned and publicly-driven project. The Policy Plan involved literally hundreds of public officials, agency 1 representatives, private business people and interested citizens. This progressive group, leaders all, gave much of their precious time and effort towards a goal of planning for livable communities c and for a better Mercer County future. Mercer County Board of Commissioners who stand committed to planning and I achieving a high quality of life for Mercer County citizens: Ohia M. Lazor, Chairperson William M. Reznor 1 Joseph F. Fragle John G.Johnson 8 Mercer County Regional Planning Commission which embodies regional planning I and cooperation and provided valuable input at various stages of the Policy Plan: Albert W. Law - New Vernon, Mary A. Ziegler - New Lebanon Chairman Edward Bowman - Sandy Lake I James L. Hogan - Jefferson, Robert W. Kaltenbaugh - Sandy Lake Vice Chairman John P. Alfred0 - Sharpsville I Burroughs Price, Jr. - Greenville, Rocco DelFratte - Sharpsville Secretary Brian Reiser - Stoneboro Richard A. Mackell - Grove City, Samuel A. Scott - Stoneboro 1 Treasurer Linda Bollinger - West Middlesex William Morocco - Farrell David G.George, Jr. - West Middlesex Jerry Miller - Farrell Mary Jane Cusick - Wheatland 1 Gary Nitch - Hermitage Ray Foster - Wheatland James A. Rollinson - Hermitage John B. Courtney - Findley James "Pat" White - Hermitage Earl E. Sealand - Findley I Leo A. Hanky - Sharon Russell L. Dawes - Hempfield Fred Hoffman - Sharon Mary Gealy - Jackson Patricia Miller - Sharon W. Jerry Vernam - Jackson I Emma Jane Cubbison - Clark Joanne Brown - Jefferson Harold R. Zook - Clark Frank Cochran - New Vernon Dorothy Hillman - Fredonia Richard Straub - Otter Creek e Dennis C. Cascio - Greenville Paulette Young - Otter Creek Clifford McCandless - Grove City Richard Marshall - Perry I Walter Klingensmith - Jamestown Fred Brenner - Pine Darryl Pinney - Jamestown Thomas B. Miller - Pine Brian Hope - Mercer George J. Fiedler, Jr. - Pymatuning I Howard T. Lippold - Mercer George W. Lescisin - Pymatuning Janice Good - New Lebanon Scott Campbell - Shenango I Mike Sabo - Shenango Dean Alexander - Mercer County 1 James Fitzpatrick - South Pymatuning Ronald Banjak - Mercer County Michael Nashtock - South Pymatuning Freida Eakman - Mercer County Richard Dillaman - Springfield Ethel Friede - Mercer County 1 Harold M. IfR - Springfield Herbert E. King - Mercer County Jeff Hoy - Wilmington Gail G. Moon - Mercer County Carol Kaufman - Wilmington Marta Nagel - Mercer County I Jim Dickson - Wolf Creek Olivia M. Lazor - Mercer County Jim Doersch - Wolf Creek I 0 Mercer County Regional Planning Commission Staff which worked hard developing this plan, mixing its expertise with the visions and opinions of many stakeholders: I Dennis G. Puko, Executive Director Carmen L. Reichard, Grants Admin. Richard R. Darko, Assistant Director Margaret B. Heldorfer, Draftsperson I Julie M. Slater, Senior Planner Marilyn Ciprich, Admin. Secretary Daniel M. Gracenin, Planner Evelyn Wike, Secretary Steven L. Tingley, Planner 1 Visioning Committee, largely responsible for drafting the vision and policy objectives and for instilling "common sense" in this work. (A list of names and affiliations of the 52-member 1 committee is included in the Appendix.) I 0 Municipal Mapping Services, Inc., the consultant who performed computer-based land use mapping, land use trend analysis and other mapping included in this report - John G. Dulski, project manager. I 0 Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs which provided funding, direction, advice and continued support: 1 Dallas A. Dollase, Director Anthony J. Mottle, Planning Analyst Bureau of Community Planning Erie Regional Ofice 1 0 And last but no least, the regional public meeting participants, citizens who responded to the public opinion survey and the many agency/govemment/private-sector representatives, all of 1 whom provided input critical to the future vision contained in this plan. 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I Mercer County Comprehensive Plan 1 1 1 I t 1 I I I 1 11 II Introduction I I Introduction I Mercer County Regional Planning Commission undertook the development of the Mercer County Comprehensive Plan in order to help shape the kind of future that Mercer County residents desire. The plan serves as a guide for public and private decision-making that will shape hture growth, 1 development, land use and community character. This plan recognizes that most decisions regarding the use of land are private concerns of 1 individuals, This plan also recognizes that decisions affecting public facilities, public costs and the overall quality of life involve more than one individual. They must take into account the concerns of the community at-large and the interests of future citizens who will inherit the lands, resources t and problems we leave behind. 1 Why a comprehensive plan? The impetus to develop a new countywide comprehensive plan originated with the 1991 Mercer 1 County Strategic Plan. Two objectives in the Strategic Plan called for preparation of a county land use plan and coordinated, regional land use policies and controls. The overriding goal, said the 1SO+ community leaders who wrote the Strategic Plan, is "to improve the standardof riving 1 and quality of Ive for Mercer County citizens", The Mercer County Regional Planning Commission, in its MCRZ'C 2000 self-evaluation and 1 organization plan, stated that the Commission should be doing more and better planning to enhance the county's future. It noted that it is a tragedy to maintain the status quo and fail to set 1 and pursue new goals for the betterment of communities. Lastly, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Act 247 of 1968 as amended by Act 170 of 1988 and hrther amendments) requires that all counties "shall ... prepare andadopta I conipreherrsiveplan". While Mercer County does have a comprehensive plan (prepared in seven volumes and a summary from 1973 to 1975), it is outdated and was never adopted by the Mercer t County Board of Commissioners. I Legal status of a comprehensive plan Under the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, a comprehensive plan is only an advisory document. It is not itself a development ordinance or zoning
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED
    The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The upper Shenango River runs from its origin at Pymatuning State Park’s Shenango Reservoir dam, downstream and south to the Corps of Engineer’s Lake Shenango Reservoir. This is an “as the river flows” reach of some 26 miles. Historically, the river was both a commercial and recreational resource. Parts of it were components of the Erie Canal. Much structure from locks and towpaths still exist along the river. It transported trade goods, powered gristmills, and supplied clean water to various communities. Residents swam in it, dived from its bridges, and picnicked along it. More contemporaneously, it hosted canoe races, casual canoe and kayak trips, all sorts of fishers, and duck hunters. The Borough of Greenville uses it as it’s principal source of domestic water. Other pubic water suppliers who draw upon the Shenango are the Reynolds Water Company, Sharpsville Borough Water Company, and others farther down the river. At present, and in the recent past, none of these attributes are reasonably available to the public due to the severe number and extent of the blockages now obstructing the river. It is the mission of the Shenango River Watchers, Inc. (“SRW”) to re-open the channel, and then improve access to the river. We will then raise public awareness of the river’s attributes by bringing it into the Pennsylvania Water Trail system. The following comments and quotations reflect upon the inherent value of preserving the Shenango River watershed for broadly drawn environmental reasons. A Water Trail exists within, and contributes to, protecting and enhancing these virtues, whether threatened by environmental degradation or simply unknown to the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River
    Information Sheet for Beaver River Page 1 of 3 Information Sheet Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River What is being proposed? A Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL plan has been developed to improve the water quality in the Beaver River basin. Who is proposing the plan? To whom? Why? The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is proposing to submit the plan to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval as required by the federal regulations. In 1995, EPA was sued for not developing TMDLs when Pennsylvania did not do so. DEP has entered into an agreement with EPA to develop TMDLs for certain specified waters over the next several years. DEP developed this TMDL in compliance with the state/EPA agreement. What is a TMDL? A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) sets a ceiling on the pollutant loads that can enter a waterbody so that the water will meet water quality standards. The Clean Water Act requires states to list all waters that do not meet their water quality standards even after pollution controls required by law are in place. For these waters, the state must calculate how much of a substance can be put in the water without violating the standard, and then distribute that quantity among all the sources of the pollutant on that waterbody. A TMDL plan includes waste load allocations for point sources, load allocations for nonpoint sources and a margin of safety. The Clean Water Act requires states to submit their TMDLs to EPA for approval. Also, if a state does not develop the TMDL, the Clean Water Act states that EPA must do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Pymatuning Scenic River Designation Study 111318.Indd
    Pymatuning Creek State Wild and Scenic River Designation Study September 2018 Pymatuning Creek State Wild and Scenic River Designation Study A Study of the Pymatuning Creek for Inclusion into Ohio’s Scenic Rivers System Prepared By Matthew Smith Northeast Ohio Assistant Regional Scenic Rivers Manager September 2018 Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Watercraft Cover Photo Credit: Ryan Moss, ODNR Pymatuning Creek Wild and Scenic River Designation Study 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................3 Introduction ................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................7 Criteria for Wild, Scenic and Recreational River Designation ..........................................11 Scenic River Designation Process ................................................................................15 General Description of Pymatuning Creek Watershed ...................................................19 Natural Features of the Pymatuning Creek Corridor ...................................................... 27 Geology ..........................................................................................................27 Plants .............................................................................................................29 Invertebrates and Mollusks
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: the Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20)
    PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: The Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20) S.R. 0224, Section L02 State Street Bridge Replacement Project Mahoning Township, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ER #1999-6092-073 Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 11-0 45 Thomas Run Road Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 15017 Submitted by: A.D. Marble & Company 100 Gamma Drive Suite 203 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY........................................1 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 B. Project Setting................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio
    In cooperation with the City of Youngstown, Ohio Water Quality in the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio Water-Resources Investigations Report 02 4122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Mill Creek at Lake Glacier outlet, Youngstown, Ohio. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Quality of the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio By Donald M. Stoeckel and S. Alex Covert Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4122 In cooperation with the City of Youngstown, Ohio U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Columbus, Ohio 2002 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View the Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan
    The Pennsylvania Rivers Conservation Program Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan July 2005 Prepared for: Shenango River Watershed Community Prepared by: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Watershed Assistance Center 246 South Walnut Street Blairsville, PA 15717 This project was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program under the administration of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan ii Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Title Page……………………………………………………………………. i Letter from Nick Pinizzotto, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy ii Preface………………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures ix Acknowledgements xi Acronyms xii Watershed Definition xiv Executive Summary………………………………………………………… ES-1 Project Background ES -1 Purpose ES-1 Planning Process ES-2 Implementation ES-2 Chapter Summaries ES-4 Project Area Characteristics ES-4 Land Resources ES-4 Water Resources ES-5 Biological Resources ES-6 Cultural Resources ES-7 Issues and Concerns ES-8 Management Recommendations ES-8 Project Area Characteristics………………………………………………. 1-1 Project Area 1-1 Location 1-1 Size 1-1 Climate 1-9 Topography 1-9 Major Tributaries 1-11 Air Quality 1-11 Atmospheric Deposition 1-12 Critical Pollutants 1-12 Mercury 1-13 Impacts of Air Pollution 1-14 Socio-economic Profile 1-14 Land-Use Planning and Regulation 1-14 Demographics and Population Patterns 1-18 Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Left Logstown, Near the Present Site of An> Bridge, Pennsylvania, On
    FROM LOGSTOWN TO VENANGO WITH GEORGE WASHINGTON1 W. WALTER BRAHAM Washington left Logstown, near the present site of An> Georgebridge, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, November 30, 1753, and arrived at Venango, now Franklin, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, Decem- ber 4. His route between these two points has been the subject of much speculation. Washington's biographers, from John Marshall, who blandly assumes that he went up the Allegheny River, to the late Doug- las Southall Freeman, who traced his route through Branchton inButler County, all adopt without comment the theory of a journey by a direct route from Logstown to Venango by way of Murderingtown. Dr. Free- man's recent and excellent volumes on "Young Washington'' give present point to the inquiry. The first-hand evidence on the trip of Washington to Fort Le Boeuf is of course in the diaries of Washington and of his companion, Christopher Gist, and the map of western Pennsylvania and Virginia believed to have been prepared by Washington himself and now lodged in the British Museum. 2 The diary entries are brief and may be quoted in full. Washington's diary entries concerning this part of his trip are: [Nov.] 30th. We set out about 9 o-Clock with the Half-King, Jeska- kake, White Thunder, and the Hunter; and travelled on the Road to Venango, where we arrived the 4th of December, without any Thing remarkable happening but a continued Series of bad Weather. [Dec] 4£7i. This is an old Indian Town, situated at the Mouth of French Creek on Ohio; and lies near N.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Inventory
    Y T N U O C A STATE GAME LAND 213 L 214 PYMATUNING STATE PARK STATE GAME LAND 214 U B A Greenville T Natural Heritage WILLIAMSON RD H S S a n A k e y s R u n Inventory Map C R A W F O R D C O U N T Y E G ?i E L 6 ?é L T IÄ O H C Aâ A L V Sandy Creek Headwaters BDA County Significant French Creek LCA Exceptional E E Mercer County Comprehensive Plan I !"c H Crooked Creek BDA High T 8 I¥ French Creek BDA Exceptional N AV Shenango River BDA Exceptional T GLEN H A V Shenango River LCA Exceptional E 270 C O Cranberry Swamp BDA High L GREENVILLE U M B I A Mercer County, Pennsylvania A V E Deer Creek BDA County Significant 270 S au STATE GAME LAND 270 l R un Salem BDA Notable Sandy Creek LCA Exceptional Greenville East 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 AÛ Miles J Lake Wilhelm BDA High O H N S MAURICE K. GODDARD STATE PARK O N Mercer Av R M D u 294 n n e Shenango River BDA Exceptional l AÛ l A` Urey Swamp BDA High R u n Kashner Corners BDA Notable Legend O A K L A N D R Aâ D Landscape Conservation Areas Shenango River LCA Except ional Oakland A U T Y U D M R N T T UNKNOWN C D J Biological Diversity Areas R N V O N T S RD U S H AS UNKNOWN I¥ E R BG U U SCR E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 in Review, Issue 26
    Shenango River Watchers, Inc. 2 0 1 0 i n r e v i e w N E W S L E T T E R I S S U E 26 WELCOME BOARD OF DIRECTORS: President To Our New Home Don Clowes Late this past summer the SRW office was relocated to one Vice President of the truly great places in the Shenango Valley, the F.H. Buhl Carol Budanka Park. Thanks to the Board of Trustees of the Park we were offered an opportunity to lease the vacated Gate House along Treasurer Forker Boulevard. The Gate house is a modest, but beautiful Tom Amundsen building and a perfect space and location to conduct the busi- Secretary ness of SRW and we are honored to have our home base at this Gwendolyn Maxfield area landmark. Our own mission is to “restore and protect the environmental, scenic, and recreational attributes of the Shenango River Wa- Del Williams, Jennifer Barborak and Emma tershed”. The F.H Buhl Park is a respected example of the very Barborak - September 1, 2010 - after receiving Jennifer Barborak things we are all about and we could not be happier having it the keys to our new home Rick Barborak outside our door. Hugh Clark Our mailing address and phone number are the same, but we Joyce Cuff * Please see the SRW Open House now get to call one of the great places in the watershed, the John Eaton information listed on page 7 Daniel Godinich F.H. Buhl Park, our home. Anna Mary Hoovler Joel Ristvey Mark Russell In Memorium Del Williams, one of Shenango River Watchers’ founding members, passed away on September 5, 2010, after a brave battle with cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shenango Formation (Mississippian) in Northwestern Pennsylvania
    The Shenango Formation (Mississippian) in Northwestern Pennsylvania By GRANT E. KIMMEL and GEORGE R. SCHINER CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1294-C Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1970 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.G. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract. ______________ ___________________________________________ Cl Introduction._____________________________________________________ 1 Previous investigations-____________________________________________ 3 Shenango Formation.______________________________________________ 4 Lower member.___-____--_-__--_-_-___-__-______-__-_---_--_-_ 8 Upper member._______________________________________________ 8 M easured sections._ _______________________________________________ 9 References_ _____________________________________________________ 13 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map of northwestern Pennsjrlvania, showing principal geo­ graphic features, names of counties and quadrangles men­ tioned in report, and location of area shown in figure 2____- C2 2. Generalized geologic map of parts of the Shenango and Stone- boro quadrangles, Mercer County, Pa., showing location of sections and wells, and township names mentioned in report- _ 4 3. Chart showing stratigraphic names applied to some of the Mis- sissippian rocks in northwestern Pennsylvania-____________ 5 4. Geologic sections and gamma-ray logs showing the lithologic variation of the lower member of the Shenango Formation, and the relation of the upper member to the lower member and the Pottsville Group in the Shenango and Stoneboro quadrangles, Pennsylvania-___-______----_------_------- 6 CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY THE SHENANGO FORMATION (MISSISSIPPIAN) IN NORTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA By GRANT E.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharon Bicentennial Park Master Plan Narrative and Master Site Plan
    SHARON BICENTENNIAL PARK MASTER PLAN NARRATIVE AND MASTER SITE PLAN HHSDR ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS 40 SHENANGO AVENUE SHARON, PENNSYLVANIA 16146-1502 SHARON ~ PITTSBURGH FINAL REPORT © JANUARY 31, 2009 #3520 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................2 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................3 Site Information and Analysis .....................................................................................................5 Table 1 – Attributes of Bicentennial Park .........................................................................5 SP 1 – Site Plan of Bicentennial Park...................................................................... foldout Background Information and Data, and Needs Assessment........................................................6 Table 2 – The City Parks and Recreation System .............................................................7 Figure 1 – John Nolen’s Comprehensive Park and Parkway Plan the City.......................9 Existing Community Plans ..............................................................................................10 Table 3 – Public and Small Group Meetings...................................................................12 Activities and Facilities Analysis ..............................................................................................14 Table 4 – Priority of Needs and
    [Show full text]