DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological and Water Quality Study Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological and Water Quality Study Of Biological and Water Quality Study of the Lower Mahoning River Watershed, 2011 and 2013 Ashtabula, Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull Counties, Ohio and Lawrence County, Pennsylvania Mahoning River RM 12.42, Lowellville, dst. First St. Bridge Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2013-LMAHO-2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section December 2018 TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2013-LMAHO-2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Lower Mahoning River Watershed December 2018 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Lower Mahoning River Watershed, 2011 and 2013 Ashtabula, Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull counties, Ohio Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, Ohio December 2018 Ohio EPA Report AMS/2013-LMAHO-2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Division of Surface Water Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road Twinsburg, Ohio 44087 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 John R. Kasich, Governor State of Ohio Craig W. Butler, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency AMS/2013-LMAHO-2 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Lower Mahoning River Watershed December 2018 Table of Contents Report Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Lower Mahoning River Mainstem ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Lower Mahoning River Tributaries ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Improvements to Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Study Area Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26 NPDES-Regulated Facilities .................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Historical Point Source Loadings ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 NPDES Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Water Chemistry ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Water Quality Grab Results ............................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Water Quality Sonde Results.......................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Trophic Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Recreation Use ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 64 Sediment Chemistry ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 71 Mahoning River .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 76 Mahoning River Tributaries ........................................................................................................................................................................... 80 Stream Physical Habitat ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 Trends Assessment .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 91 Fish Community ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 93 Macroinvertebrate Community ........................................................................................................................................................................ 105 Lower Mahoning River Mainstem ............................................................................................................................................................. 105 Lower Mahoning River Tributaries: Upstream City of Niles.......................................................................................................... 115 Mosquito Creek Watershed .......................................................................................................................................................................... 116 Meander Creek Watershed ........................................................................................................................................................................... 117 Mill Creek Watershed ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 118 Lower Mahoning River Tributaries ................................................................................................................................................................ 120 Downstream City of Niles .............................................................................................................................................................................. 120 Fish Tissue Contamination ................................................................................................................................................................................. 122 Fish Advisories ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 123 Fish Tissue/Human Health Use Attainment ......................................................................................................................................... 124 Fish Contaminant Trends .............................................................................................................................................................................. 124 Inland Lakes Monitoring...................................................................................................................................................................................... 126 Water Quality Standards for the Protection of Aquatic Life in Lakes ........................................................................................ 127 Mosquito Creek Lake ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 127 Lake Watershed ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 127 Lake Monitoring................................................................................................................................................................................................. 130 Lake
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED
    The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The upper Shenango River runs from its origin at Pymatuning State Park’s Shenango Reservoir dam, downstream and south to the Corps of Engineer’s Lake Shenango Reservoir. This is an “as the river flows” reach of some 26 miles. Historically, the river was both a commercial and recreational resource. Parts of it were components of the Erie Canal. Much structure from locks and towpaths still exist along the river. It transported trade goods, powered gristmills, and supplied clean water to various communities. Residents swam in it, dived from its bridges, and picnicked along it. More contemporaneously, it hosted canoe races, casual canoe and kayak trips, all sorts of fishers, and duck hunters. The Borough of Greenville uses it as it’s principal source of domestic water. Other pubic water suppliers who draw upon the Shenango are the Reynolds Water Company, Sharpsville Borough Water Company, and others farther down the river. At present, and in the recent past, none of these attributes are reasonably available to the public due to the severe number and extent of the blockages now obstructing the river. It is the mission of the Shenango River Watchers, Inc. (“SRW”) to re-open the channel, and then improve access to the river. We will then raise public awareness of the river’s attributes by bringing it into the Pennsylvania Water Trail system. The following comments and quotations reflect upon the inherent value of preserving the Shenango River watershed for broadly drawn environmental reasons. A Water Trail exists within, and contributes to, protecting and enhancing these virtues, whether threatened by environmental degradation or simply unknown to the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River
    Information Sheet for Beaver River Page 1 of 3 Information Sheet Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River What is being proposed? A Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL plan has been developed to improve the water quality in the Beaver River basin. Who is proposing the plan? To whom? Why? The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is proposing to submit the plan to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval as required by the federal regulations. In 1995, EPA was sued for not developing TMDLs when Pennsylvania did not do so. DEP has entered into an agreement with EPA to develop TMDLs for certain specified waters over the next several years. DEP developed this TMDL in compliance with the state/EPA agreement. What is a TMDL? A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) sets a ceiling on the pollutant loads that can enter a waterbody so that the water will meet water quality standards. The Clean Water Act requires states to list all waters that do not meet their water quality standards even after pollution controls required by law are in place. For these waters, the state must calculate how much of a substance can be put in the water without violating the standard, and then distribute that quantity among all the sources of the pollutant on that waterbody. A TMDL plan includes waste load allocations for point sources, load allocations for nonpoint sources and a margin of safety. The Clean Water Act requires states to submit their TMDLs to EPA for approval. Also, if a state does not develop the TMDL, the Clean Water Act states that EPA must do so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
    The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • 3745-1-25 Mahoning River Drainage Basin
    3745-1-25 Mahoning river drainage basin. (A) The water bodies listed in table 25-1 of this rule are ordered from downstream to upstream. Tributaries of a water body are indented. The aquatic life habitat, water supply and recreation use designations are defined in rule 3745-1-07 of the Administrative Code. The state resource water use designation is defined in rule 3745-1-05 of the Administrative Code. The most stringent criteria associated with any one of the use designations assigned to a water body will apply to that water body. (B) Figure 1 of the appendix to this rule is a generalized map of the Mahoning river drainage basin. A generalized map of Ohio outlining the twenty-three major drainage basins and listing associated rule numbers in this chapter is in figure 1 of the appendix to rule 3745-1-08 of the Administrative Code. (C) RM, as used in this rule, stands for river mile and refers to the method used by the Ohio environmental protection agency to identify locations along a water body. Mileage is defined as the lineal distance from the downstream terminus (i.e., mouth) and moving in an upstream direction. (D) The following symbols are used throughout this rule: * Designated use based on the 1978 water quality standards. + Designated use based on the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency. o Designated use based on justification other than the results of a biological field assessment performed by the Ohio environmental protection agency. 3745-1-25 2 Table 25-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pymatuning Scenic River Designation Study 111318.Indd
    Pymatuning Creek State Wild and Scenic River Designation Study September 2018 Pymatuning Creek State Wild and Scenic River Designation Study A Study of the Pymatuning Creek for Inclusion into Ohio’s Scenic Rivers System Prepared By Matthew Smith Northeast Ohio Assistant Regional Scenic Rivers Manager September 2018 Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Watercraft Cover Photo Credit: Ryan Moss, ODNR Pymatuning Creek Wild and Scenic River Designation Study 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................3 Introduction ................................................................................................................5 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................7 Criteria for Wild, Scenic and Recreational River Designation ..........................................11 Scenic River Designation Process ................................................................................15 General Description of Pymatuning Creek Watershed ...................................................19 Natural Features of the Pymatuning Creek Corridor ...................................................... 27 Geology ..........................................................................................................27 Plants .............................................................................................................29 Invertebrates and Mollusks
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: the Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20)
    PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: The Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20) S.R. 0224, Section L02 State Street Bridge Replacement Project Mahoning Township, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ER #1999-6092-073 Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 11-0 45 Thomas Run Road Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 15017 Submitted by: A.D. Marble & Company 100 Gamma Drive Suite 203 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY........................................1 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 B. Project Setting................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio
    In cooperation with the City of Youngstown, Ohio Water Quality in the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio Water-Resources Investigations Report 02 4122 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Mill Creek at Lake Glacier outlet, Youngstown, Ohio. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water Quality of the Mahoning River and Selected Tributaries in Youngstown, Ohio By Donald M. Stoeckel and S. Alex Covert Water-Resources Investigations Report 02–4122 In cooperation with the City of Youngstown, Ohio U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Columbus, Ohio 2002 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Areawide Wastewater Treatment Management Plan
    Chapter 2 Water Quality Conditions in Mahoning and Trumbull Counties Water can indicate the health of a watershed’s ecosystem by studying and identifying the organisms found within it and it can summarize the land use activities within a watershed when analyzed for contaminants and their sources. This chapter highlights current water quality conditions of the water courses in the watersheds of Mahoning and Trumbull Counties. Information presented in this chapter was drawn from official water quality reports, community plans, and watershed action plans. 2.1 Clean Water Act Applications and Reporting The Clean Water Act (CWA) contains a comprehensive reporting program protecting the Nation’s valuable water resources. Sections 305 (b) and 303 (d) of the CWA, required states to create summaries of surface water conditions (305(b) reports) and develop a list of water bodies not meeting state water quality standards (303(d) list). The 305(b) report was to be a routine check on improvements states were making towards the CWA’s goals. To address impaired waters listed in the 303(d) document, the state creates measures to improve conditions via the development of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), water quality specific permitting, and nonpoint source pollution control measures. Under Federal guidance, the Ohio EPA developed a watershed based method of reporting, “Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report” (Integrated Report). This new reporting method, combines the 305 (b) water quality reports with the 303 (d) list of impaired waters, satisfying CWA reporting requirements for both Section 303 (b) and Section 303 (d). Beginning in 2002, the Integrated Report summarizes the water quality conditions using a watershed’s 12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC).
    [Show full text]
  • View the Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan
    The Pennsylvania Rivers Conservation Program Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan July 2005 Prepared for: Shenango River Watershed Community Prepared by: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Watershed Assistance Center 246 South Walnut Street Blairsville, PA 15717 This project was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnership Program under the administration of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan ii Shenango River Watershed Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Title Page……………………………………………………………………. i Letter from Nick Pinizzotto, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy ii Preface………………………………………………………………………. iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures ix Acknowledgements xi Acronyms xii Watershed Definition xiv Executive Summary………………………………………………………… ES-1 Project Background ES -1 Purpose ES-1 Planning Process ES-2 Implementation ES-2 Chapter Summaries ES-4 Project Area Characteristics ES-4 Land Resources ES-4 Water Resources ES-5 Biological Resources ES-6 Cultural Resources ES-7 Issues and Concerns ES-8 Management Recommendations ES-8 Project Area Characteristics………………………………………………. 1-1 Project Area 1-1 Location 1-1 Size 1-1 Climate 1-9 Topography 1-9 Major Tributaries 1-11 Air Quality 1-11 Atmospheric Deposition 1-12 Critical Pollutants 1-12 Mercury 1-13 Impacts of Air Pollution 1-14 Socio-economic Profile 1-14 Land-Use Planning and Regulation 1-14 Demographics and Population Patterns 1-18 Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Left Logstown, Near the Present Site of An> Bridge, Pennsylvania, On
    FROM LOGSTOWN TO VENANGO WITH GEORGE WASHINGTON1 W. WALTER BRAHAM Washington left Logstown, near the present site of An> Georgebridge, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, November 30, 1753, and arrived at Venango, now Franklin, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, Decem- ber 4. His route between these two points has been the subject of much speculation. Washington's biographers, from John Marshall, who blandly assumes that he went up the Allegheny River, to the late Doug- las Southall Freeman, who traced his route through Branchton inButler County, all adopt without comment the theory of a journey by a direct route from Logstown to Venango by way of Murderingtown. Dr. Free- man's recent and excellent volumes on "Young Washington'' give present point to the inquiry. The first-hand evidence on the trip of Washington to Fort Le Boeuf is of course in the diaries of Washington and of his companion, Christopher Gist, and the map of western Pennsylvania and Virginia believed to have been prepared by Washington himself and now lodged in the British Museum. 2 The diary entries are brief and may be quoted in full. Washington's diary entries concerning this part of his trip are: [Nov.] 30th. We set out about 9 o-Clock with the Half-King, Jeska- kake, White Thunder, and the Hunter; and travelled on the Road to Venango, where we arrived the 4th of December, without any Thing remarkable happening but a continued Series of bad Weather. [Dec] 4£7i. This is an old Indian Town, situated at the Mouth of French Creek on Ohio; and lies near N.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]