County City Establishment Tribe Smoke-Free Areas
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Proposed Information Collection
13316 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 65 / Thursday, April 4, 2019 / Notices 194. Pueblo of Tesuque 239. Skokomish Indian Tribe National Indian Gaming Commission. 195. Puyallup Tribe of Indians 240. Smith River Rancheria Jonodev Chaudhuri, 196. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe 241. Snoqualmie Tribe Chairman. 197. Quapaw Tribe of Indians 242. Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Kathryn Isom-Clause, 198. Quartz Valley Indian Community 243. Sokaogon Chippewa Community Vice Chair. 199. Quechan Tribe of Fort Yuma Indian 244. Southern Ute Indian Tribe E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Reservation 245. Sprite Lake Tribe 200. Quileute Tribe 246. Spokane Tribe of Indians Associate Commissioner. 201. Quinault Indian Nation 247. Squaxin Island Tribe [FR Doc. 2019–06566 Filed 4–3–19; 8:45 am] 202. Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior 248. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of BILLING CODE 7565–01–P Chippewa Indians Wisconsin 203. Red Cliff, Sokaogon Chippewa and 249. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Lac Courte Oreilles Band 250. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe INTERNATIONAL TRADE 204. Red Lake Band of Chippewa 251. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians COMMISSION Indians 252. Stockbridge-Munsee Community 205. Redding Rancheria 253. Suquamish Tribe of the Port Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Petition 206. Redwood Valley Rancheria of Madison Reservation System; Proposed Information Pomo Indians 254. Susanville Indian Rancheria Collection; Comment Request; 207. Reno-Sparks Indian Colony 255. Swinomish Indian Tribal Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Petition 208. Resighini Rancheria of Coast Indian Community Submission and Comment Forms Community 256. Sycuan Band of Diegueno Mission AGENCY: United States International 209. Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Trade Commission. Indians 257. Table Mountain Rancheria 210. -
Gaming Statutes
All Gambling is Illegal Unless Specifically Excluded from Illegality. Gambling is defined in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 13-3301(4) to require risking something of value for an opportunity to win a benefit, which is awarded by chance. As provided by A.R.S. § 13-3302, all gambling is illegal in Arizona unless a statute excludes it as legal. Charitable organizations may qualify for an exclusion from illegal gambling by being licensed under A.R.S. § 5-504(I) for Arizona Lottery pull tab games, A.R.S. § 5-512 for all products of the Arizona Lottery, or by qualifying as a non profit for the conduct of raffles under A.R.S. § 13-3302(B). The statutes limit unlicensed charitable organizations to conducting raffles. All other forms of gambling are prohibited. Arizona statutes provide no definition of raffle, and no Arizona court has defined raffle. A raffle machine is required to follow the usual and ordinary definition of a raffle with the only difference being that it is played on a machine to qualify as a raffle machine. A second chance raffle drawing conducted after the conduct of Keno on a machine does not change the character of the Keno to a raffle. Each component must be authorized by law or it is illegal gambling. Arizona Liquor Law - A.R.S. §4-244. Unlawful acts It is unlawful: 26. For a licensee or employee to knowingly permit unlawful gambling on the premises. Arizona liquor law does not allow gambling at liquor-licensed businesses when the customer is required to pay for a chance to win something of value. -
Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and -
Smokefree Casinos and Gambling Facilities
SMOKEFREE CASINOS AND GAMBLING FACILITIES SMOKEFREE MODEL POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION TOOLKIT Smokefree Casinos and Gambling Facilities OCTOBER 2013 State-Regulated Gaming Facilities There are now more than 500 smokefree casinos and gambling facilities in the U.S. It is required by law in 20 states, a growing number of cities, and in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. In addition, a growing number of sovereign American Indian tribes have made their gambling jobsites smokefree indoors (see page 9). Note: This list does not include all off-track betting (OTB) facilities. To view a map of U.S. States and territories that require state-regulated gaming facilities to be 100% smokefree, go to www.no-smoke.org/pdf/100smokefreecasinos.pdf. Arizona Crystal Casino and Hotel ..........Compton Apache Greyhound Park ..........Apache Junction Club Caribe Casino ...............Cudahy Turf Paradise Racecourse .........Phoenix Del Mar ..........................Del Mar Rillito Park Race Track ............Tucson The Aviator Casino ................Delano Tucson Greyhound Park ..........Tucson St. Charles Place ..................Downieville Tommy’s Casino and Saloon. El Centro California Oaks Card Club ...................Emeryville Golden Gate Fields ................Albany S & K Card Room .................Eureka Kelly’s Cardroom .................Antioch Folsom Lake Bowl Nineteenth Hole ..................Antioch Sports Bar and Casino ............Folsom Santa Anita Park ..................Arcadia Club One Casino ..................Fresno Deuces Wild Casino -
A Solid Performance Strong Performance from Core Businesses Drive 2019 Results in Rapidly Evolving Industry
Financial highlights A solid performance Strong performance from core businesses drive 2019 results in rapidly evolving industry Revenue Adjusted EBITDA Regulated revenue €1,508m €383m 88% 2019 1,508 2019 383 2019 88 2018 1,225 2018 345 2018 80 2017 807 2017 322 2017 54 Operating cash flow Total shareholder returns €317m €120m 2019 317 2019 120 2018 385 2018 116 2017 307 2017 113 2 Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019 Operational highlights Significant Strategic Report Strategic operational progress Playtech had another busy year with new product launches, innovations, new customer wins and extended relationships with existing customers Governance Major new strategic Fortuna migrates Sportsbook onto Swiss Casinos partners with agreement with Wplay Playtech’s omni-channel platform Playtech to lead new online In November 2019 Playtech signed a major Playtech announced that Fortuna market in Switzerland deal with one of Colombia’s leading brands. Entertainment Group, the largest betting Swiss Casinos, which operates one of Under the agreement Playtech will become and gaming operator in Central and Eastern Switzerland’s largest casinos, Casino Zurich, Wplay’s strategic technology partner Europe, completed the migration of its became the latest major European operator Financial Statements delivering its omni-channel products together Sportsbook in Slovakia onto Playtech’s IMS to partner with Playtech in September 2019 with operational and marketing services platform. Fortuna customers can now in order to access its award-winning Casino across Wplay’s retail and online operations. seamlessly access Sportsbook funds and Live Casino offering. across retail and online, while Fortuna is Playtech has a track record of developing now able to harness Playtech’s Engagement Playtech’s Casino offering allows players to newly regulated online markets through the Centre and safer gambling tools across its access content anywhere, at any time and successful structured agreement with omni-channel offering. -
Redding Rancheria Motion for Summary J
Case3:11-cv-01493-SC Document17 Filed09/30/11 Page1 of 48 1 LESTER J. MARSTON, California State Bar No. 081030 DAVID J. RAPPORT, California State Bar No. 054384 2 RAPPORT AND MARSTON 405 West Perkins Street, P.O. Box 488 3 Ukiah, CA 95482 Telephone: 707-462-6846 4 Facsimile: 707-462-4235 e-mail: [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 TRACY EDWARDS, California State Bar No. 195402 NEAL MALMSTEN, California State Bar No. 237487 7 OFFICE OF THE TRIBAL ATTORNEY REDDING RANCHERIA 8 2000 Redding Rancheria Road Redding, CA 96001 9 Telephone: 530-225-8979 Facsimile: 530-241-1879 10 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] 11 12 SARA DUTSCHKE SETSHWAELO, California State Bar No. 244848 SNR DENTON US LLP th 13 525 Market Street, 26 Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2708 14 Telephone: 415-882-5000 Facsimile: 415-882-0300 15 e-mail: [email protected] 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 REDDING RANCHERIA, ) Case No. CV 11-01493 SC 20 ) Plaintiff, ) 21 ) v. ) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR 22 ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official ) OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN 23 capacity as the Secretary of the United ) SUPPORT THEREOF States Department of the Interior, and ) 24 LARRY ECHO HAWK, in his official ) capacity as the Assistant Secretary for ) Date: December 2, 2011 25 Indian Affairs for the United States ) Time: 1:00 p.m. Department of the Interior, ) Ctrm.: 1, Hon. Samuel Conti 26 ) Defendants. ) 27 __________________________________) 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMO. -
Doi) Reorganization
1 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2 3 TRIBAL CONSULTATION 4 5 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (DOI) REORGANIZATION 6 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 8 TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 9 10 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 11 12 Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort 13 12222 New York Ranch Road 14 Jackson, California 95642 15 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 REPORTED BY: Annette Romero, Office of the Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs and 25 Elizabeth K. Appel, Acting Chief of Staff, AS-IA 26 DATE OF PROCEEDINGS: June 19, 2018 2 1 ATTENDEES 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY – INDIAN AFFAIRS: 4 John Tahsuda, III, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs 5 6 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY – INDIAN AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF REGULATORY 7 AFFAIRS AND COLLABORATIVE ACTION: 8 Elizabeth K. Appel, Director 9 Annette Romero 10 AUDIENCE MEMBERS 11 12 BEAR RIVER BAND OF THE ROHNERVILLE RANCHERIA: 13 David Montoya 14 15 CAHTO RANCHERIA TRIBE: 16 Aimie Lucas, Chairwoman 17 CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA: 18 Maria Elliott 19 Vickey Macias, Tribal Treasurer 20 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ: 21 Delores Pigsley, Chariwoman 22 IOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: 23 Michael Garcia 24 MECHOOPALA: 25 Cassy Wilson 26 NORTH FORK MONO RANCHERIA: 27 Leora Beihn 28 Elaine Fink, Vice-Chairwoman 29 REDDING RANCHERIA: 30 Jonathan Clifton 31 Jeremy Hayward 32 Michelle Hayward 33 Mike Hollowell, Attorney 34 Hope Wilkes 3 1 ATTENDEES (CONTINUED) 2 SCOTTS VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS: 3 Shawn Davis 4 SUSANVILLE INDIAN RANCHERIA 5 Deana M. Boveé, Tribal Chairwoman 6 Rietta M. -
Gambling Among the Chinese: a Comprehensive Review
Clinical Psychology Review 28 (2008) 1152–1166 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Psychology Review Gambling among the Chinese: A comprehensive review Jasmine M.Y. Loo a,⁎, Namrata Raylu a,b, Tian Po S. Oei a a School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia b Drug, Alcohol, and Gambling Service, Hornsby Hospital, Hornsby, NSW 2077, Australia article info abstract Article history: Despite being a significant issue, there has been a lack of systematic reviews on gambling and problem Received 23 November 2007 gambling (PG) among the Chinese. Thus, this paper attempts to fill this theoretical gap. A literature Received in revised form 26 March 2008 search of social sciences databases (from 1840 to now) yielded 25 articles with a total sample of 12,848 Accepted 2 April 2008 Chinese community participants and 3397 clinical participants. The major findings were: (1) Social gambling is widespread among Chinese communitiesasitisapreferredformofentertainment.(2) Keywords: Prevalence estimates for PG have increased over the years and currently ranged from 2.5% to 4.0%. (3) Gambling Chinese problem gamblers consistently have difficulty admitting their issue and seeking professional Chinese help for fear of losing respect. (4) Theories, assessments, and interventions developed in the West are Ethnicity Problem gambling currently used to explain and treat PG among the Chinese. There is an urgent need for theory-based Culture interventions specifically tailored for Chinese problem gamblers. (5) Cultural differences exist in Addiction patterns of gambling when compared with Western samples; however, evidence is inconsistent. Pathological gambling Methodological considerations in this area of research are highlighted and suggestions for further Review investigation are also included. -
Native American Heritage Commission Response to HCD 2018 CDBG-DR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION November 18, 2020 Joseph Helo, Program Manager CA Department of Housing and Community Development CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Via Email to: [email protected] Luiseño Cc to: [email protected] VICE CHAIRPERSO N Re: Native American Contact List for the Owner Occupied Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Reginald Pagali ng Program - 2018 Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery Project, Lake and Chumash Ventura Counties SECRETARY Dear Mr. Helo: Merri Lopez-Keifer Luiseño Attached are lists of tribes that have cultural and traditional affiliation to the area of potential effect (APE) for the project referenced above. I suggest you contact all of the tribes listed, and PARLIAMENTARI AN if they cannot supply information regarding the presence of cultural resources, they may Russell Attebe ry recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate Karuk areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will better able to respond to claims of failure to consult, as consultation may be COMMISSIONER required under specific state Statutes. If a response from the tribe has not been received within Marshall McKay two weeks of notification, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requests that you Wintun follow up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. COMMISSIONER William Mungary The NAHC also recommends that the project proponents conduct a record search of the Paiute/White Mountain NAHC’s Sacred Lands File (SLF) and also of the appropriate regional archaeological Apache Information Center of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) to determine if any tribal cultural resources are located within the APE of the project. -
Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 107/Wednesday, June 3, 2020
34228 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices Oklahoma and the Wichita and of these human remains and associated the request to the University of the Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco funerary objects should submit a written Pacific, Dugoni School of Dentistry at & Tawakonie), Oklahoma (hereafter request with information in support of the address in this notice by July 6, referred to as ‘‘The Tribes’’). the request to Dr. Marc Levine, 2020. Associate Curator of Archaeology, Sam History and Description of the Remains ADDRESSES: Dorothy Dechant, Center for Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Dental History and Craniofacial Study, In 1957, human remains representing, History, University of Oklahoma, 2401 University of the Pacific, Dugoni School at minimum, four individuals were Chautauqua Avenue, Norman, OK of Dentistry, 155 Fifth Street, San excavated by the University of 73072–7029, telephone (405) 325–1994, Francisco, CA 94103–2919, telephone Oklahoma at site 34Ms20 in Muskogee email [email protected], by July 6, 2020. (415) 929–6627, email ddechant@ County, OK. At an unknown date, the After that date, if no additional pacific.edu. associated cultural materials were requestors have come forward, transfer SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: transferred to the Museum. The human of control of the human remains and Notice is here given in accordance with the remains include the partial skeleton of associated funerary objects to The Native American Graves Protection and an adult male 20–35 years old that were Tribes may proceed. Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. commingled with remains of a child 7– The Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of 3003, of the completion of an inventory 9 years old, a young adult 18–22 years Natural History is responsible for of human remains under the control of old of indeterminate sex, and a young notifying The Tribes that this notice has the University of the Pacific, Dugoni adult 20–30 years old of indeterminate been published. -
The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias
Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 2 60 Years after the Enactment of the Indian Country Statute - What Was, What Is, and What Should Be Winter 2008 The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias William Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William Wood, The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villages, Pueblos, Missions, Ranchos, Reservations, Colonies, and Rancherias, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 317 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss2/1 This Native American Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wood: The Trajectory of Indian Country in California: Rancherias, Villa THE TRAJECTORY OF INDIAN COUNTRY IN CALIFORNIA: RANCHERIAS, VILLAGES, PUEBLOS, MISSIONS, RANCHOS, RESERVATIONS, COLONIES, AND RANCHERIAS William Wood* 1. INTRODUCTION This article examines the path, or trajectory,1 of Indian country in California. More precisely, it explores the origin and historical development over the last three centuries of a legal principle and practice under which a particular, protected status has been extended to land areas belonging to and occupied by indigenous peoples in what is now California. The examination shows that ever since the Spanish first established a continuing presence in California in 1769, the governing colonial regime has accorded Indian lands such status. -
![[Nps-Waso-Nagpra- Nps0026943; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/2913/nps-waso-nagpra-nps0026943-ppwocradn0-pcu00rp14-r50000-1032913.webp)
[Nps-Waso-Nagpra- Nps0026943; Ppwocradn0-Pcu00rp14.R50000]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/06/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-26445, and on govinfo.gov 4312-52 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS-WASO-NAGPRA- NPS0026943; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000] Notice of Inventory Completion: University of California, Davis, Davis, CA AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The University of California, Davis (UC Davis), has completed an inventory of human remains housed in the UC Davis Department of Anthropology Museum, in consultation with the appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations, and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and present-day Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request to UC Davis. If no additional requestors come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to the lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, or Native Hawaiian organizations stated in this notice may proceed. DATES: Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to UC Davis at the address in this notice by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Megon Noble, NAGPRA Project Manager, University of California, Davis, 433 1 Mrak Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, telephone (530) 752-8501, email [email protected].